Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 166:
A company is designing an application that will process high volumes of messages from multiple producers and requires reliable message delivery and decoupling between components. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) Amazon SQS
B) Amazon SNS
C) AWS Lambda
D) Amazon Kinesis
Answer:
Amazon SQS
Explanation:
The company’s scenario involves processing a high volume of messages from multiple producers while requiring reliable delivery and decoupling of application components. Decoupling ensures that one part of the system can fail or scale independently without impacting other components, enhancing overall application resilience and flexibility.
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables decoupling of components in distributed applications. SQS supports two types of queues: Standard and FIFO (First-In-First-Out). Standard queues provide high throughput, at-least-once delivery, and best-effort ordering, making them suitable for most general message processing workloads. FIFO queues guarantee exactly-once processing and preserve message order, which is critical for applications where the sequence of events matters. By leveraging SQS, the company can buffer and store messages temporarily, allowing consumers to process messages asynchronously and independently of the producers. This decoupling reduces application dependencies, increases fault tolerance, and allows scalable processing pipelines. SQS automatically scales to handle high volumes of messages and integrates with other AWS services like AWS Lambda, Amazon EC2, and Amazon ECS, providing flexibility in building event-driven architectures.
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) is a fully managed publish-subscribe messaging service designed to send notifications to multiple subscribers. SNS supports fan-out architectures where messages are pushed to multiple endpoints, including SQS queues, Lambda functions, or HTTP endpoints. While SNS can distribute messages broadly, it does not provide queuing and decoupling with guaranteed asynchronous processing on its own. SNS is better suited for broadcast scenarios rather than buffering and reliable, decoupled processing.
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that runs code in response to events. Lambda can process messages delivered through SQS or triggered via SNS, but it is not a messaging service itself. It requires an event source for message delivery and is intended for short-duration code execution. Using Lambda directly without a queuing layer does not provide guaranteed message persistence or decoupling.
Amazon Kinesis is a platform for real-time streaming of data at scale. Kinesis Streams enables high-throughput ingestion and processing of streaming data and is designed for near real-time analytics rather than standard message queuing. Kinesis ensures data ordering and allows multiple consumers to process data simultaneously, but it is more complex to manage and costs are typically higher for scenarios where simple reliable message queuing suffices.
By selecting Amazon SQS, the company gains a reliable, scalable, and fully managed queuing service that buffers messages and decouples producers from consumers. SQS ensures that messages are retained until successfully processed, provides configurable retention periods, and supports dead-letter queues for handling failed message processing. SQS reduces operational overhead because AWS manages the infrastructure, scaling, and fault tolerance. Integration with other AWS services allows seamless building of scalable microservices and distributed applications. Monitoring through CloudWatch provides visibility into queue metrics such as message count, processing latency, and throughput, enabling optimization and capacity planning. SQS allows the company to handle traffic spikes gracefully, manage message retries, and maintain system resilience while decoupling components, making it the optimal choice for reliable message delivery in high-volume workloads.
Question 167:
A company wants to monitor and track API calls made to their AWS resources to support auditing, compliance, and troubleshooting requirements. Which AWS service provides this functionality?
A) AWS CloudTrail
B) Amazon CloudWatch
C) AWS Config
D) AWS Trusted Advisor
Answer:
AWS CloudTrail
Explanation:
The company’s goal is to monitor and track API calls to their AWS resources for auditing, compliance, and troubleshooting purposes. Auditing ensures accountability, compliance ensures adherence to regulatory and organizational policies, and troubleshooting enables quick resolution of operational issues. Choosing the right AWS service involves understanding the types of data and monitoring required.
AWS CloudTrail is a fully managed service that records all API activity across AWS accounts. CloudTrail captures details such as the identity of the caller, the time of the API call, the source IP address, parameters used in the request, and the response from AWS. This information is recorded in logs stored in Amazon S3, where it can be retained for long-term auditing purposes. CloudTrail allows organizations to monitor account activity, detect unauthorized access, and investigate operational or security incidents. It also integrates with AWS CloudWatch for real-time monitoring and alerting based on specific API activity patterns. CloudTrail can log management events, which cover operations on resources such as creating or modifying an EC2 instance, and data events, which capture object-level operations such as S3 object access or Lambda function invocation. The service provides critical visibility into changes and access, supporting regulatory compliance, forensic analysis, and internal security policies.
Amazon CloudWatch is primarily a monitoring and observability service. It collects metrics, logs, and events to provide insights into application performance, resource utilization, and operational health. While CloudWatch can provide metrics and alarms based on resource utilization or system logs, it does not automatically capture API-level actions across AWS services. CloudWatch is complementary to CloudTrail by enabling metric-based monitoring, alerting, and dashboards for system and application performance.
AWS Config is a configuration management service that tracks changes to resource configurations, evaluates compliance against rules, and provides a historical view of configuration changes. Config is ideal for understanding how resources have changed over time, enforcing compliance with desired states, and performing risk assessment. However, Config focuses on the state and relationships of resources rather than detailed API call tracking. While it can alert when configurations change, it does not provide complete API-level visibility.
AWS Trusted Advisor provides recommendations for optimizing AWS environments in areas such as cost, security, fault tolerance, and performance. Trusted Advisor is advisory in nature and does not record or log API calls for auditing or troubleshooting purposes.
Using AWS CloudTrail allows the company to achieve complete visibility over AWS account activity. By enabling multi-region logging, organizations can ensure that API activity across all regions is captured centrally. CloudTrail also supports log file integrity validation to prevent tampering and to meet compliance standards. Organizations can create trails to monitor all AWS accounts within an organization using AWS Organizations, facilitating centralized logging and security management. Integration with services like AWS Lambda and Amazon Athena allows for automated analysis and querying of CloudTrail logs to detect anomalies, generate compliance reports, and trigger automated remediation. For auditing purposes, CloudTrail provides time-stamped records that demonstrate accountability and can support regulatory audits. For troubleshooting, detailed API call records allow teams to understand the sequence of events leading to incidents, identify root causes, and implement corrective measures. Overall, CloudTrail provides comprehensive visibility into API activity, enabling organizations to meet auditing, compliance, and operational monitoring objectives efficiently.
Question 168:
A company is designing a serverless application and wants to run code without provisioning or managing servers, scaling automatically with incoming requests. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) AWS Lambda
B) Amazon EC2
C) Amazon ECS
D) AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Answer:
AWS Lambda
Explanation:
The company’s objective is to deploy a serverless application that executes code without the need for provisioning or managing servers and automatically scales based on incoming requests. Serverless architectures provide significant operational efficiency, reducing administrative overhead and improving agility. AWS provides multiple compute options, but evaluating them against serverless requirements helps identify the most appropriate service.
AWS Lambda is a fully managed serverless compute service that allows code execution in response to events without provisioning or managing servers. Lambda supports multiple programming languages, including Python, Node.js, Java, C#, and Go, enabling organizations to use familiar development tools. Lambda automatically scales to handle incoming requests, provisioning compute resources dynamically as needed. This automatic scaling ensures that applications can handle traffic spikes without manual intervention or upfront capacity planning. Lambda is event-driven and can be triggered by a wide variety of AWS services such as Amazon S3, DynamoDB, Kinesis, SNS, API Gateway, and CloudWatch events. Billing is based on actual compute time and the number of requests, providing cost efficiency for applications with variable or unpredictable workloads.
Amazon EC2 provides virtual servers in the cloud with full control over the operating system and underlying infrastructure. While EC2 supports high flexibility and control, it requires manual provisioning, configuration, patching, and scaling, which is contrary to the serverless approach. EC2 is suitable for long-running applications with predictable capacity requirements but not for purely serverless, event-driven workloads.
Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service) allows running and managing Docker containers at scale. ECS provides flexibility and integration with other AWS services, but containerized workloads still require cluster management, task definitions, and scaling strategies. While ECS supports Fargate, which is a serverless compute engine for containers, the service overall introduces more operational overhead than Lambda for simple event-driven applications.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) that automates deployment, scaling, and monitoring of applications. It supports various environments such as EC2 and containers. While Beanstalk simplifies operational management, it still provisions underlying EC2 instances, which introduces some operational responsibilities and limits immediate serverless execution capabilities.
Using AWS Lambda, the company achieves true serverless execution, where developers focus solely on code logic while AWS manages runtime, scaling, availability, and fault tolerance. Lambda supports versioning, aliases, and environment variables, which enables efficient application lifecycle management. Integration with monitoring tools like CloudWatch allows tracking of invocations, errors, and performance metrics. Lambda also supports function chaining, enabling microservices architectures, and can be combined with Step Functions for orchestrating workflows. Security is handled via IAM roles that grant fine-grained permissions to Lambda functions, and VPC integration allows secure access to private resources. By using Lambda, the company eliminates infrastructure management tasks, reduces operational complexity, and benefits from cost-effective scaling that automatically aligns with demand, making Lambda the optimal choice for a serverless application environment.
Question 169:
A company wants to host a static website on AWS and requires low-cost storage with high durability while allowing users to access the website over the internet. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) Amazon S3
B) Amazon EC2
C) Amazon RDS
D) AWS Lambda
Answer:
Amazon S3
Explanation:
The company’s objective is to host a static website using AWS with minimal cost, high durability, and internet accessibility. Understanding the differences between AWS storage and compute services is critical to selecting the correct service that aligns with these goals.
Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) is a fully managed object storage service that provides durable and scalable storage for a variety of use cases, including static website hosting. S3 offers eleven nines of durability, ensuring that objects stored remain safe over long periods. For static website hosting, S3 allows hosting HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and other static assets directly. S3 static website hosting provides a public endpoint to serve content over the internet using HTTP or HTTPS, eliminating the need for server infrastructure. Costs are based on storage used and data transfer out, making it an economical option for hosting static websites. Additionally, S3 integrates with Amazon CloudFront to provide a content delivery network, which further reduces latency for users globally and improves performance. Using bucket policies, permissions, and AWS Identity and Access Management, the company can manage access securely while exposing the website to public users. S3 also supports versioning, enabling safe updates and rollback capabilities for website content. Lifecycle policies allow automatic transitions of objects to lower-cost storage classes such as S3 Glacier for archival, further optimizing costs.
Amazon EC2 provides scalable compute resources but is primarily designed for running applications, databases, or server-based workloads. Hosting a static website on EC2 would require provisioning and managing instances, installing a web server, and maintaining uptime and scaling manually, resulting in higher operational complexity and cost. EC2 is better suited for dynamic or server-side processing rather than serving static content.
Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service designed for transactional or analytical workloads, not static content hosting. Using RDS for hosting static websites is inefficient and unrelated to the requirements because it focuses on structured data management, replication, backups, and high availability for relational databases.
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service for executing code in response to events. Lambda is ideal for dynamic, event-driven workloads rather than hosting static websites. While it can serve dynamic content when combined with API Gateway, Lambda alone does not provide a simple or low-cost solution for static content.
By selecting Amazon S3, the company leverages a solution optimized for static content hosting with minimal operational overhead. S3’s durability ensures data integrity, while its scalability allows handling traffic spikes without additional configuration. Integration with CloudFront allows caching at edge locations, reducing latency and improving user experience globally. Access can be controlled securely using bucket policies and IAM roles, and logging can be enabled for monitoring access patterns and compliance purposes. S3 also provides encryption at rest using server-side encryption and supports HTTPS for secure data transfer. The ability to manage lifecycle policies, versioning, and automatic scaling without managing servers provides a cost-effective and highly available solution for static websites. This approach minimizes operational tasks, optimizes performance, and ensures content is durable and accessible over the internet, aligning perfectly with the company’s objectives.
Question 170:
A company wants to implement a scalable relational database that can automatically adjust capacity based on demand while maintaining high availability and durability. Which AWS service meets these requirements?
A) Amazon Aurora Serverless
B) Amazon RDS Single-AZ
C) Amazon DynamoDB
D) Amazon Redshift
Answer:
Amazon Aurora Serverless
Explanation:
The company requires a relational database solution that is both scalable and highly available while reducing operational overhead. Analyzing AWS database services helps identify which service aligns with automatic scaling, availability, and durability.
Amazon Aurora Serverless is a relational database that automatically scales compute and storage capacity based on workload demand. Aurora is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL engines, providing relational database capabilities without the need to manage database instances directly. It supports on-demand scaling, which is ideal for applications with variable or unpredictable workloads. Aurora Serverless eliminates the need for manual provisioning, allowing the database to start automatically when connections are made and pause during periods of inactivity to reduce costs. It provides high availability through replication across multiple Availability Zones and maintains durability by storing data across multiple copies within an AWS region. Aurora includes automated backups, continuous snapshots, and point-in-time recovery to ensure data integrity and operational continuity.
Amazon RDS Single-AZ provides a managed relational database with automated backups, patching, and maintenance, but it operates in a single Availability Zone. Single-AZ deployments do not provide built-in high availability and are vulnerable to infrastructure failures, making them unsuitable for applications requiring automatic scaling with high availability.
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that supports fast and predictable performance with automatic scaling. While DynamoDB offers high availability and durability, it is a NoSQL database and does not provide the relational features such as SQL queries, joins, or foreign keys. Applications requiring relational models cannot easily migrate to DynamoDB without significant architectural changes.
Amazon Redshift is a managed data warehouse designed for analytical queries and large-scale data processing. While Redshift can scale storage and compute independently, it is intended for analytics rather than operational transactional workloads typical of relational applications.
Amazon Aurora Serverless provides an optimal solution for the company’s requirements. Its serverless architecture automatically adjusts capacity according to demand, providing cost efficiency and eliminating the need for manual capacity management. High availability is achieved through multi-AZ replication, while durability is ensured with multiple copies of data stored across separate physical locations. Aurora Serverless also integrates with monitoring and security tools, including CloudWatch for performance monitoring, IAM for access control, and VPC for network security. Applications benefit from fast failover capabilities in case of infrastructure issues, maintaining operational continuity without human intervention. The automatic scaling capability allows seamless handling of workload spikes, while the database pauses during periods of inactivity, minimizing operational costs. Backup retention policies and point-in-time recovery enable protection against accidental data loss. Aurora Serverless provides the features, performance, and reliability expected from a relational database while reducing operational management and adapting dynamically to workload demands, making it the ideal choice for scalable, highly available, and durable relational database applications.
Question 171:
A company needs a service that can provide recommendations for optimizing AWS resources in terms of cost, security, fault tolerance, and performance. Which service should the company use?
A) AWS Trusted Advisor
B) AWS Config
C) Amazon CloudWatch
D) AWS CloudTrail
Answer:
AWS Trusted Advisor
Explanation:
The company requires a service that provides actionable recommendations across multiple areas such as cost optimization, security best practices, fault tolerance, and performance improvement. AWS offers multiple tools for monitoring, auditing, and configuration analysis, but the choice depends on the type of guidance and recommendations provided.
AWS Trusted Advisor is a service that provides real-time guidance to help optimize AWS environments according to best practices. Trusted Advisor evaluates AWS accounts across five key categories: cost optimization, security, fault tolerance, performance, and service limits. For cost optimization, Trusted Advisor can identify underutilized or idle resources, recommending actions such as resizing instances, deleting unused volumes, or consolidating underused services. Security checks identify misconfigured access permissions, exposed resources, or insecure settings, enabling the company to remediate potential vulnerabilities. Fault tolerance recommendations help ensure high availability and resilience by highlighting instances lacking multi-AZ deployment, missing backup configurations, or unoptimized resource deployment. Performance checks suggest optimizations like increasing IOPS or using more appropriate instance types to improve efficiency. Trusted Advisor provides detailed guidance with links to relevant documentation and supports integration with AWS Support for automated or manual remediation. Users can also generate reports and track the status of recommendations over time.
AWS Config monitors and records resource configurations and evaluates compliance with defined rules. While Config can provide insight into resource state changes and compliance violations, it does not offer actionable recommendations across cost, performance, and fault tolerance simultaneously. It focuses primarily on configuration monitoring and compliance rather than holistic optimization guidance.
Amazon CloudWatch provides monitoring, logging, and observability for AWS resources and applications. CloudWatch collects metrics, logs, and events to support operational monitoring and performance analysis. Although CloudWatch alerts can help identify issues, it does not proactively provide optimization recommendations for cost, security, or fault tolerance.
AWS CloudTrail records API calls made in the AWS account to enable auditing and security tracking. CloudTrail is essential for investigating actions and maintaining accountability, but it does not evaluate resource usage or provide optimization guidance for cost or performance improvements.
Using AWS Trusted Advisor, the company gains a single-pane view of their AWS environment with actionable recommendations across multiple operational dimensions. Trusted Advisor checks are updated regularly to reflect AWS best practices and evolving security or performance guidelines. Recommendations can be applied manually or, for certain checks, programmatically using automation scripts integrated with AWS services. Trusted Advisor also highlights service limit utilization, enabling proactive scaling or resource adjustments before reaching constraints. For cost-conscious organizations, Trusted Advisor’s insights help identify opportunities for savings through rightsizing, reserved instance utilization, and elimination of idle resources. For security-conscious organizations, Trusted Advisor identifies exposed security groups, IAM misconfigurations, and encryption settings, ensuring that resources adhere to security standards. Performance recommendations assist in tuning workloads for better efficiency and responsiveness, while fault tolerance checks ensure the architecture is resilient against failures. By leveraging Trusted Advisor, the company can systematically optimize AWS resource utilization, enhance operational efficiency, maintain compliance, and improve the overall performance and resilience of their cloud environment, making it an indispensable tool for organizations seeking proactive guidance and best practice recommendations in AWS.
Question 172:
A company needs to store frequently accessed data with low latency and requires a database that supports key-value and document data models with seamless scalability. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) Amazon DynamoDB
B) Amazon RDS
C) Amazon Aurora
D) Amazon Redshift
Answer:
Amazon DynamoDB
Explanation:
The company requires a database solution that provides low-latency access to frequently accessed data, supports flexible data models, and scales seamlessly without manual intervention. Evaluating AWS database offerings clarifies which service meets these requirements.
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides key-value and document data models. It is designed for low-latency, high-performance workloads where response times in milliseconds are critical. DynamoDB automatically scales throughput capacity and storage based on traffic patterns, enabling seamless handling of variable workloads without manual provisioning. Its serverless architecture eliminates operational overhead such as patching, replication management, and scaling decisions. DynamoDB supports automatic partitioning and sharding to handle large-scale applications, making it suitable for scenarios with unpredictable or rapidly growing workloads. The service also offers features such as DynamoDB Streams, which capture table activity for event-driven architectures, and global tables, which provide fully replicated multi-region capabilities for high availability and disaster recovery. With encryption at rest and fine-grained access control using AWS IAM, DynamoDB ensures data security and compliance with regulatory requirements. Performance can be further enhanced by using DAX (DynamoDB Accelerator), an in-memory caching service that reduces response times for read-heavy workloads.
Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service supporting traditional SQL-based relational models. While RDS provides high availability, automated backups, and multi-AZ deployments, it is less suitable for key-value or document workloads and does not automatically scale throughput to accommodate sudden spikes in traffic. RDS is ideal for structured, transactional data but does not meet the low-latency requirements for large-scale NoSQL applications.
Amazon Aurora is a high-performance relational database compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. Aurora provides scalability, fault tolerance, and high availability, but like RDS, it is a relational system and does not provide native support for key-value or document models. Aurora is optimal for applications that require relational features and advanced SQL capabilities, but not for serverless NoSQL workloads demanding millisecond latency at scale.
Amazon Redshift is a managed data warehouse designed for analytical workloads involving large datasets and complex queries. Redshift excels at aggregating and analyzing large volumes of structured data but is not intended for low-latency transactional or NoSQL workloads. It is better suited for business intelligence and analytics rather than high-performance operational applications.
By using Amazon DynamoDB, the company gains a fully managed, serverless, key-value, and document database that automatically adjusts to changing workload demands. DynamoDB allows developers to store structured or semi-structured data without worrying about schema design limitations. Global tables provide multi-region replication, enabling low-latency access for users around the world while ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. Fine-grained access control ensures that security and compliance standards are met, while encryption safeguards sensitive data. Advanced features like DynamoDB Streams and triggers enable real-time processing and event-driven application architectures. Using DAX or global tables further optimizes read performance for frequently accessed data. Operationally, DynamoDB minimizes administrative overhead by automatically handling provisioning, replication, scaling, and maintenance tasks. This allows development teams to focus on application logic rather than infrastructure, while also ensuring predictable performance under heavy workloads. DynamoDB’s flexible data model supports both simple key-value lookups and complex document-based structures, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of applications such as e-commerce shopping carts, gaming leaderboards, IoT telemetry ingestion, and mobile app backends. With its low-latency access, seamless scalability, and minimal operational management, DynamoDB aligns perfectly with the company’s requirements for high-performance, frequently accessed data storage with flexible data models.
Question 173:
A company wants to protect its AWS workloads from DDoS attacks and ensure high availability during traffic spikes. Which AWS service is designed specifically to provide these protections?
A) AWS Shield
B) AWS WAF
C) AWS IAM
D) Amazon CloudFront
Answer:
AWS Shield
Explanation:
The company’s goal is to safeguard AWS workloads from Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks while maintaining high availability during sudden traffic spikes. Understanding AWS security and network protection services allows selecting the appropriate solution.
AWS Shield is a managed DDoS protection service designed to defend applications running on AWS from volumetric, protocol, and application layer attacks. Shield provides two levels of protection: Standard and Advanced. Shield Standard automatically protects all AWS customers at no additional cost, providing mitigation against common network and transport layer attacks that could impact availability. Shield Advanced provides enhanced detection and mitigation capabilities for larger and more sophisticated attacks, along with cost protection for scaling events caused by DDoS attacks. Shield integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, Elastic Load Balancing, and Route 53, enabling comprehensive protection across edge and regional resources. Shield Advanced also offers detailed attack diagnostics, real-time notifications, and access to the AWS DDoS Response Team for expert guidance during incidents. By leveraging AWS Shield, the company ensures continuous availability of its workloads, minimal operational overhead for DDoS mitigation, and alignment with best practices for securing cloud environments.
AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) is designed to protect web applications from common web exploits and attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and bad bot traffic. While WAF enhances application layer security, it does not provide comprehensive protection against large-scale volumetric or network-level DDoS attacks. WAF is typically used alongside Shield or CloudFront to provide layered security for web applications.
AWS IAM (Identity and Access Management) provides fine-grained access control to AWS resources. IAM enables organizations to define permissions and enforce least-privilege access, but it does not address DDoS attacks or high traffic availability concerns. IAM’s role in security is complementary to network protection services rather than a direct mitigation tool.
Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that caches content at edge locations to reduce latency for end users and improve performance. While CloudFront can help absorb traffic surges and distribute requests globally, it is not specifically a DDoS protection service. CloudFront is often used in combination with AWS Shield to increase resilience and provide a multi-layered defense against attacks.
Using AWS Shield, the company gains specialized protection against attacks that aim to disrupt service availability. Shield Standard automatically detects and mitigates common network and transport layer attacks in real time, allowing workloads to remain available without manual intervention. Shield Advanced enhances protection by providing detailed attack visibility, proactive mitigation strategies, and access to security experts. Integration with CloudFront, ELB, and Route 53 ensures that edge and regional resources benefit from distributed attack mitigation, preventing traffic spikes from overwhelming origin servers. Organizations can monitor attack metrics, generate compliance reports, and analyze historical attack patterns to improve security posture. Shield also provides proactive threat intelligence and integrates with AWS Firewall Manager to simplify centralized security management across multiple accounts. By implementing AWS Shield, the company ensures high availability during traffic spikes, minimizes downtime, maintains service continuity, and aligns with security best practices, making it the most appropriate service for protecting AWS workloads from DDoS attacks.
Question 174:
A company wants to analyze large amounts of streaming data in real-time, such as log files and clickstreams, and needs a fully managed service that can ingest and process these data streams. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) Amazon Kinesis
B) Amazon S3
C) Amazon RDS
D) AWS Lambda
Answer:
Amazon Kinesis
Explanation:
The company’s scenario involves analyzing streaming data in real-time, including log files and clickstreams, with a requirement for a fully managed service that handles ingestion, processing, and scalability. Streaming data analysis allows organizations to derive insights promptly, detect anomalies, and make operational decisions based on current information.
Amazon Kinesis is a suite of fully managed services designed to collect, process, and analyze real-time streaming data. The Kinesis platform includes Kinesis Data Streams, Kinesis Data Firehose, Kinesis Data Analytics, and Kinesis Video Streams. Kinesis Data Streams allows real-time ingestion of high-throughput data streams from multiple sources and provides reliable storage for processing by multiple consumer applications. The service automatically scales to match the data volume and throughput, ensuring no data loss and consistent performance. Kinesis Data Firehose simplifies streaming data delivery to destinations such as Amazon S3, Redshift, Elasticsearch Service, or Splunk without requiring custom applications. Kinesis Data Analytics enables SQL-based processing and real-time analytics directly on streaming data, providing insights within seconds. Kinesis supports multi-shard architectures, enabling horizontal scaling to accommodate massive data volumes, and integrates with AWS Lambda for serverless processing pipelines.
Amazon S3 is an object storage service designed for durable storage and retrieval of large datasets. While S3 can store historical log files or batch data for later analysis, it does not support real-time ingestion and processing of streaming data. S3 is suitable for static or batch-oriented workloads rather than real-time streaming analytics.
Amazon RDS provides managed relational databases that are ideal for structured transactional workloads but are not designed for high-throughput streaming data ingestion or real-time analytics. RDS supports queries and transactions on structured data but cannot scale elastically to accommodate massive continuous data streams.
AWS Lambda allows serverless processing in response to events but does not provide native functionality for ingesting and analyzing large-scale streaming data continuously. Lambda can be triggered by Kinesis streams or S3 events but relies on an external service to manage the actual stream ingestion and delivery.
Amazon Kinesis provides a comprehensive, fully managed solution for ingesting and processing streaming data in real-time. Its ability to scale automatically, handle high-throughput workloads, and integrate with analytics, storage, and serverless processing services makes it ideal for scenarios involving log aggregation, clickstream analysis, IoT telemetry, and financial transactions. Kinesis ensures reliable delivery of messages, allows multiple consumer applications to process the same data independently, and supports fault-tolerant storage with replication across multiple Availability Zones. Real-time analytics can detect trends, generate metrics, trigger alerts, or feed machine learning models for predictive insights. The service simplifies operational overhead by managing infrastructure, scaling, and fault tolerance automatically, allowing developers and analysts to focus on building applications and extracting value from streaming data. Kinesis also integrates with monitoring tools such as CloudWatch for metrics and alarms, providing visibility into stream health, throughput, and latency. By leveraging Kinesis, the company can efficiently analyze streaming data in real time, improve decision-making, and maintain scalable, reliable, and fully managed data processing pipelines.
Question 175:
A company wants to deploy an application across multiple AWS regions to ensure high availability and fault tolerance. Which service allows the company to route user requests to the nearest healthy endpoint automatically?
A) Amazon Route 53
B) AWS CloudTrail
C) Amazon CloudWatch
D) AWS IAM
Answer:
Amazon Route 53
Explanation:
The company aims to deploy applications across multiple AWS regions to achieve high availability and fault tolerance. When deploying applications in multiple regions, it is essential to ensure that user requests are directed to the optimal endpoint, minimizing latency and ensuring continuous availability even in the case of regional failures. Amazon Route 53 is AWS’s scalable and highly available Domain Name System (DNS) web service designed precisely for this purpose. Route 53 enables routing of end-user requests to the nearest, healthy endpoint using multiple routing policies, including latency-based routing, geolocation routing, failover routing, and weighted routing. By implementing latency-based routing, Route 53 evaluates the latency between users and various endpoints, directing traffic to the region with the lowest latency. This improves application performance and ensures users receive the fastest response times.
Failover routing policies in Route 53 provide enhanced resilience by automatically routing traffic to a standby resource when a primary endpoint becomes unhealthy. Route 53 health checks continuously monitor the health of application endpoints. If an endpoint fails, Route 53 redirects traffic to healthy endpoints in other regions without requiring manual intervention. Additionally, geolocation routing enables the company to serve users from endpoints closest to their geographic location, allowing for compliance with data residency requirements and optimization of user experience. Weighted routing can split traffic between multiple endpoints based on specified ratios, which is useful for testing new application versions or distributing workloads efficiently. Route 53 integrates with other AWS services such as Elastic Load Balancing and CloudFront to improve redundancy, enhance global performance, and provide end-to-end application availability.
AWS CloudTrail is primarily a logging and auditing service that records API calls made in an AWS account for security and compliance purposes. While CloudTrail provides visibility into account activity and changes in AWS resources, it does not manage routing of user requests or provide failover capabilities. CloudTrail’s focus is auditing, monitoring, and compliance rather than high-availability routing for applications.
Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring and observability service that collects metrics, logs, and events from AWS resources. CloudWatch provides visibility into operational health, application performance, and infrastructure utilization. It can trigger alarms and automated responses when predefined thresholds are exceeded. Although CloudWatch is critical for monitoring the health of endpoints and can integrate with Route 53 for health checks, it does not route user requests or handle traffic redirection by itself.
AWS IAM (Identity and Access Management) enables secure control of access to AWS services and resources. IAM allows organizations to define fine-grained permissions and enforce the principle of least privilege. While IAM is essential for securing resources, it does not provide routing, traffic management, or high availability functionalities for applications.
Using Amazon Route 53, the company can ensure that user requests are efficiently and intelligently directed to the nearest healthy endpoints, improving both performance and fault tolerance. For example, if the company has endpoints in US East, US West, and Europe, Route 53 can direct a user in Germany to the European endpoint, a user in California to the US West endpoint, and a user in New York to the US East endpoint. If one endpoint fails, Route 53 automatically reroutes traffic to the next best healthy region, maintaining continuous availability. Integration with CloudWatch health checks allows dynamic response to changing endpoint conditions, detecting failures and initiating failover procedures instantly. This design eliminates the risk of service disruption due to regional outages, network congestion, or server failures. Additionally, Route 53 can manage domain names and DNS configurations, providing a seamless experience for both administrators and users. Organizations can also use Route 53 in combination with CloudFront to further optimize content delivery globally, providing caching and acceleration at edge locations to reduce latency and improve application responsiveness. Route 53’s ability to provide automated failover, intelligent traffic distribution, and tight integration with other AWS services makes it an indispensable tool for maintaining high availability, fault tolerance, and global performance for multi-region applications.
Question 176:
A company is planning to store archival data that is rarely accessed but must be retained for several years to meet compliance requirements. Which AWS storage class is most cost-effective for this use case?
A) Amazon S3 Glacier
B) Amazon S3 Standard
C) Amazon EBS
D) Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering
Answer:
Amazon S3 Glacier
Explanation:
The company requires a storage solution for archival data that is infrequently accessed but must be preserved for several years to satisfy regulatory or compliance requirements. Understanding the AWS storage offerings and their cost and access characteristics is essential to selecting the correct solution. Amazon S3 Glacier is a low-cost storage class within Amazon S3 designed specifically for archival storage. Glacier provides secure, durable, and highly scalable storage for long-term retention of data with retrieval times ranging from minutes to hours, depending on the chosen retrieval option. The service is optimized for infrequently accessed data where immediate availability is not critical, making it cost-effective for compliance-driven storage use cases.
S3 Glacier offers different retrieval options, including expedited, standard, and bulk retrievals. Expedited retrieval allows access to data within minutes, standard retrieval typically takes 3–5 hours, and bulk retrieval is suitable for large amounts of data with a retrieval window of 5–12 hours. This flexibility enables organizations to balance cost and retrieval latency based on operational requirements. Glacier ensures high durability, providing 11 nines of durability by replicating data across multiple Availability Zones, which guarantees that data remains intact over long periods. S3 Glacier integrates with lifecycle policies that allow automatic transition of data from more expensive storage classes, such as S3 Standard, to Glacier as data ages, optimizing storage costs without requiring manual intervention.
Amazon S3 Standard is designed for frequently accessed data and provides low-latency, high-throughput access suitable for operational workloads. While it ensures durability and availability, its cost model is higher than Glacier, making it less suitable for long-term archival data that is rarely accessed.
Amazon EBS provides block-level storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances. EBS is designed for active workloads requiring low-latency access and does not provide the same cost efficiency for long-term archival storage. Additionally, managing EBS snapshots over years increases operational overhead and costs compared to Glacier.
Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves objects between access tiers based on usage patterns. While it is cost-efficient for data with changing access patterns, it is not optimized for long-term, rarely accessed archival data where the retrieval cost and latency are less significant. Glacier provides the best cost structure for archival data while maintaining the durability and security required for compliance purposes.
By selecting Amazon S3 Glacier, the company can store data securely for years while minimizing storage costs. Lifecycle policies can automate the transition of data from active storage to Glacier as data ages. Glacier’s durability ensures that even rare access events or regulatory audits do not compromise data integrity. Encryption at rest and in transit ensures compliance with data protection regulations. Audit logging and access control integration allow administrators to monitor and govern data access according to organizational policies. Additionally, Glacier’s retrieval options provide flexibility for operational or compliance-driven access requests, whether urgent or bulk retrieval, without sacrificing cost efficiency. The service’s integration with Amazon S3 management tools simplifies administration, enabling the organization to maintain consistent governance, reporting, and compliance tracking. Overall, S3 Glacier balances long-term durability, compliance, and cost-effectiveness, making it the ideal storage solution for archival workloads that are infrequently accessed.
Question 177:
A company wants to deploy a serverless application that executes code in response to events, without provisioning or managing servers. Which AWS service allows this functionality?
A) AWS Lambda
B) Amazon EC2
C) Amazon ECS
D) AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Answer:
AWS Lambda
Explanation:
The company’s requirement is to deploy a serverless application where code executes in response to events, and the organization does not want to provision or manage servers. Serverless computing allows developers to focus entirely on application logic without concern for infrastructure management, scaling, or patching.
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that automatically runs code in response to triggers or events. Lambda can be invoked by a variety of AWS services, including Amazon S3 for object uploads, Amazon DynamoDB for table updates, Amazon Kinesis or SQS for streaming data, API Gateway for HTTP requests, and CloudWatch Events for scheduled tasks. When an event occurs, Lambda executes the associated code in a fully managed execution environment, scaling automatically according to the volume of incoming requests. Developers are charged based on the number of requests and the compute time used, which provides a cost-efficient model for workloads with variable or unpredictable traffic patterns. Lambda supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Node.js, Java, and Go, and can integrate with VPC resources securely. Monitoring and logging are handled automatically via Amazon CloudWatch, which provides metrics on invocations, execution duration, errors, and throttles.
Amazon EC2 provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud but requires manual provisioning, configuration, patching, and scaling. EC2 is ideal for traditional server-based applications but does not meet the requirement for a fully serverless, event-driven architecture. The operational overhead of managing EC2 instances is substantial compared to Lambda.
Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service) manages containerized workloads and requires deployment and management of clusters, task definitions, and container orchestration. While ECS can integrate with Fargate for serverless container execution, it is fundamentally designed for container management and not purely event-driven serverless compute.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that abstracts application deployment, including underlying servers, load balancers, and networking. Beanstalk simplifies deployment of web applications and services but still involves server management and scaling considerations, making it less ideal for pure event-driven, serverless execution.
Using AWS Lambda, the company can create a highly scalable, fully managed, event-driven application. The serverless model eliminates the need to manage infrastructure, allows automatic scaling in response to events, and provides cost-efficiency through pay-per-use billing. Integration with multiple AWS services allows complex workflows to be built without provisioning servers. For example, a Lambda function can process uploaded files in S3, update records in DynamoDB, notify users via SNS, or trigger downstream processing in Step Functions. Security is integrated through IAM roles that provide fine-grained access control to resources, and monitoring via CloudWatch ensures visibility into execution performance and errors. Lambda’s stateless nature and ephemeral execution model enable rapid response to bursts of traffic, making it highly resilient and suitable for microservices architectures, event-driven pipelines, and real-time data processing applications. By leveraging Lambda, the company achieves its goal of a serverless environment where operational overhead is minimized, scalability is automatic, and development teams can focus exclusively on business logic and application innovation.
Question 178:
A company wants to run a relational database in the cloud without managing the underlying database software, patching, or backups. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) Amazon RDS
B) Amazon EC2
C) Amazon DynamoDB
D) AWS Lambda
Answer:
Amazon RDS
Explanation:
The company requires a managed relational database service that eliminates the need to handle administrative tasks such as software installation, patching, backups, and scaling. Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) is an AWS service specifically designed to provide these capabilities. RDS supports multiple database engines including Amazon Aurora, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server, offering flexibility based on application requirements. By using RDS, companies can focus on their application logic rather than the operational complexities associated with database management.
RDS automates several critical administrative tasks. First, software patching is handled automatically, ensuring that databases remain up-to-date with the latest security updates and software enhancements without manual intervention. Second, RDS provides automated backups, allowing point-in-time recovery and protecting against accidental data loss. Users can also configure backup retention periods according to organizational policies and compliance needs. Additionally, RDS offers multi-AZ deployments, creating synchronous standby replicas in separate Availability Zones to improve high availability and fault tolerance. In the event of an infrastructure failure, RDS automatically fails over to the standby instance, minimizing downtime.
RDS also provides read replicas, which enable horizontal scaling for read-heavy workloads by creating replicas of the primary database. These replicas can distribute read requests, improving application performance without impacting the primary database. Furthermore, RDS integrates seamlessly with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for access control, enabling administrators to define fine-grained permissions and enforce security best practices. Monitoring and alerting are available via Amazon CloudWatch, which tracks metrics such as CPU utilization, storage usage, and database connections. Notifications and automated responses can be configured to address anomalies or potential performance issues.
Amazon EC2 provides compute infrastructure that can host a database, but the company would still be responsible for installing, configuring, maintaining, patching, backing up, and scaling the database software. This requires more operational overhead compared to RDS and is less suitable for organizations seeking fully managed database solutions.
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database designed for key-value and document data models. While DynamoDB offers scalability, low latency, and automatic replication, it is not a relational database service and therefore does not support SQL queries, complex joins, or traditional relational database schemas. It is suitable for high-speed, high-scale applications that do not require relational constructs.
AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service for running code in response to events. It does not provide persistent storage or relational database capabilities and cannot replace RDS for this use case.
By choosing Amazon RDS, the company benefits from a fully managed relational database that automates administrative tasks, improves availability through multi-AZ deployments, allows performance optimization with read replicas, and provides a secure, monitored environment. Organizations can focus on designing applications, writing queries, and analyzing data rather than worrying about infrastructure management. RDS also integrates with other AWS services such as AWS Backup for centralized backup management, Amazon CloudWatch for performance monitoring, and AWS CloudTrail for auditing and compliance tracking. With RDS, the company can scale the database instance vertically by upgrading instance types or horizontally by adding read replicas, offering flexibility as the workload evolves. Overall, RDS provides the operational simplicity, durability, high availability, and security required for modern cloud-based relational database workloads.
Question 179:
A company is evaluating its AWS costs and wants to track spending per department. Which service allows the company to allocate costs and create detailed reports for internal chargeback purposes?
A) AWS Cost Explorer
B) Amazon CloudWatch
C) AWS IAM
D) AWS Config
Answer:
AWS Cost Explorer
Explanation:
The company aims to track its AWS spending by department and generate detailed reports to facilitate internal chargebacks. Proper cost management in AWS involves understanding where resources are being consumed, who is consuming them, and how costs can be optimized. AWS Cost Explorer is the primary service that enables organizations to visualize, understand, and manage AWS costs and usage over time. It provides interactive reporting, allowing the company to create custom reports by filtering data by services, accounts, regions, or usage types. Cost Explorer also allows tagging of AWS resources with department or project identifiers, which can be used to allocate costs accurately and generate chargeback reports for internal accounting purposes.
Cost allocation tags are crucial for breaking down costs across different organizational units. By applying consistent tags such as Department, Project, or Cost Center to AWS resources, the company can generate granular reports that attribute costs to specific departments, teams, or projects. Cost Explorer can then display usage patterns and trends, enabling organizations to monitor departmental spending, identify cost drivers, and make informed financial decisions. Historical data analysis and forecasting in Cost Explorer allows the company to predict future costs based on past trends, supporting budget planning and optimization strategies. Cost Explorer also integrates with AWS Budgets to allow threshold-based alerts. Departments can receive notifications if spending exceeds predefined limits, helping prevent unexpected cost overruns.
Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring and observability service that collects metrics, logs, and events from AWS resources. While CloudWatch helps monitor resource utilization and performance, it does not provide detailed cost reporting or support internal chargeback accounting.
AWS IAM (Identity and Access Management) provides control over who can access AWS resources and what actions they can perform. IAM is essential for securing AWS resources and defining permissions but does not track costs or usage for chargeback purposes.
AWS Config enables continuous monitoring and assessment of AWS resource configurations, ensuring compliance with governance policies. Config tracks changes in resource configurations and evaluates compliance, but it does not provide financial reporting or department-level cost allocation.
By using AWS Cost Explorer, the company can assign costs to departments using tags, generate detailed reports for internal accounting, forecast future spending, and optimize resource usage. Cost Explorer provides both a high-level overview of total AWS spend and the ability to drill down into detailed usage patterns, helping identify inefficiencies or underutilized resources. Departments can better understand their spending, enabling cost accountability and encouraging more responsible resource consumption. The combination of tagging, reporting, and forecasting ensures that finance and operations teams have the tools necessary to manage cloud spending effectively. Cost Explorer also supports exporting reports in CSV format, facilitating integration with external financial systems or internal reporting tools. Visualization options like graphs and charts make cost analysis intuitive, providing insights into cost trends, spikes, and anomalies. Ultimately, AWS Cost Explorer empowers the company to manage budgets efficiently, allocate costs accurately, and enforce financial accountability across departments while supporting ongoing cloud adoption and operational growth.
Question 180:
A company is designing an application that requires temporary, short-term credentials for users to access AWS resources securely. Which AWS service should the company use?
A) AWS Security Token Service (STS)
B) AWS IAM
C) AWS KMS
D) Amazon Cognito
Answer:
AWS Security Token Service (STS)
Explanation:
The company’s application requires temporary, short-term credentials for secure access to AWS resources. Temporary credentials are useful for scenarios where access must be limited in time, reducing exposure to security risks associated with long-term credentials. AWS Security Token Service (STS) is the service designed to provide temporary security credentials that can be used to access AWS services securely. STS generates short-lived tokens with defined permissions and expiration periods, allowing users, applications, or federated identities to access resources for a limited duration. This approach minimizes the risk of long-term credential compromise and supports fine-grained access control.
STS supports a variety of use cases. One common scenario is granting temporary credentials to mobile or web applications where embedding long-term AWS credentials is insecure. STS can also be used for cross-account access, allowing users from one AWS account to assume a role in another account without sharing permanent credentials. Additionally, STS integrates with identity federation services, such as Active Directory or social identity providers, enabling single sign-on experiences while maintaining secure access to AWS resources. Temporary credentials include an access key, secret access key, and session token, and can be automatically rotated or expired based on the duration specified during creation.
AWS IAM provides the mechanism to define users, groups, and roles along with their permissions. While IAM roles are essential in controlling access to AWS resources, IAM by itself does not provide temporary credentials; instead, IAM works in conjunction with STS to issue them. IAM users have long-term credentials, which are less secure in scenarios requiring short-term access.
AWS KMS (Key Management Service) provides centralized control over cryptographic keys used for data encryption and decryption. While KMS is crucial for securing sensitive data, it does not provide temporary access credentials to AWS resources.
Amazon Cognito provides authentication and authorization for web and mobile applications, enabling user sign-up, sign-in, and access control. Cognito can integrate with STS to obtain temporary credentials, but STS is the core service responsible for issuing the credentials themselves.
By using AWS STS, the company ensures that users and applications can access AWS resources securely without relying on long-term credentials. Temporary credentials reduce the attack surface, limit the duration of exposure in case of compromise, and support scalable, secure architectures for modern applications. STS also allows granular control over permissions by specifying IAM roles associated with the temporary credentials, ensuring that users only have access to the resources they need. Applications can request temporary credentials dynamically, enabling secure workflows for federated users, cross-account operations, and serverless applications. The combination of STS with IAM roles and policies ensures a robust security posture, allowing organizations to enforce least privilege, monitor access patterns, and respond quickly to potential threats. Integrating STS into the application design also simplifies compliance with security best practices by avoiding permanent credential distribution and supporting centralized auditability and logging of all access events.