Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 91
A company wants to block access to corporate applications from devices that are not compliant with Intune policies. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
Explanation:
Conditional Access with device compliance policies enables organizations to enforce access restrictions based on device management and health status. By integrating with Intune, devices that are enrolled and compliant with corporate security standards, including encryption, up-to-date operating systems, antivirus, and configuration policies, are granted access to applications. Non-compliant or unmanaged devices are blocked or prompted for remediation, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data leakage. This approach balances security and productivity by allowing secure devices seamless access while enforcing protective measures for non-compliant devices.
Security Defaults provide baseline security measures such as mandatory MFA for all users but do not evaluate device compliance. This makes them inadequate for scenarios requiring adaptive, device-based access enforcement.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts, providing just-in-time access workflows. It does not enforce device compliance for standard users or SaaS applications.
Access Reviews periodically evaluate user access to applications and groups but do not enforce real-time access restrictions based on device compliance or management state.
Conditional Access with device compliance policies is correct because it ensures only trusted, compliant devices can access sensitive corporate applications. It integrates with other conditions such as location, application sensitivity, and user risk, creating an adaptive, comprehensive security model. Administrators can monitor compliance, remediate non-compliant devices, and generate detailed reports for auditing and regulatory compliance. This solution minimizes the attack surface, protects organizational data, and ensures a secure, managed environment for end-user access.
Question 92
A company wants to periodically evaluate access to critical applications and automatically remove users who no longer require it. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Access Reviews
B) Conditional Access
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Access Reviews
Explanation:
Access Reviews provide a structured process to periodically evaluate user access to applications, groups, and roles. By scheduling recurring reviews, organizations ensure that users retain access only when necessary, reducing the risk of over-provisioned permissions and enforcing least-privilege principles. Automated removal of unnecessary access supports compliance with internal policies and external regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO standards. Access Reviews allow administrators and application owners to validate access, send reminders, and track completion. Reporting and audit trails document decisions and actions taken, providing transparency and governance.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies in real time, such as MFA, device compliance, or location-based controls. While effective for securing sign-ins, it does not evaluate existing access or revoke unnecessary permissions automatically.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged users, providing just-in-time access and approval workflows. It does not conduct recurring evaluation of standard user access to applications or groups.
Dynamic Groups automate membership assignments based on attributes such as department or role but do not perform recurring access evaluations or remove access that is no longer needed.
Access Reviews are correct because they combine automation, governance, and auditing to maintain secure, appropriate access. Integration with Dynamic Groups and Access Packages streamlines onboarding and offboarding, while audit logs provide visibility into access review results, who performed the review, and actions taken. This process ensures that access to critical applications remains aligned with business needs, mitigates security risks, and maintains operational efficiency.
Question 93
A company wants to provide external partners temporary access to applications with approval and automatic expiration. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Dynamic Groups
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
Explanation:
Azure AD B2B collaboration allows secure access for external contractors, vendors, or partners. Access Packages in Entitlement Management bundle multiple resources such as applications, groups, and SharePoint sites into a single package request. Approval workflows ensure access is granted only after validation, and expiration policies automatically revoke access when it is no longer required. This reduces the risk of lingering permissions and unauthorized access, supporting secure collaboration and compliance with organizational policies.
Privileged Identity Management focuses on temporary elevated roles for internal users and just-in-time access. It does not provision or manage external access with approvals or expiration.
Dynamic Groups automatically assign memberships based on user attributes but do not include approval workflows or time-limited external access.
Conditional Access enforces authentication controls like MFA or device compliance but does not provision resources, manage approvals, or enforce temporary access for external users.
Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages is correct because it provides a secure, automated, and auditable method to grant temporary external access. Integration with Conditional Access ensures additional security controls, and audit logs track requests, approvals, and expirations. This allows external partners to collaborate effectively while maintaining organizational security and compliance.
Question 94
A company wants to require MFA only for users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should they implement?
A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals enable adaptive security based on real-time evaluation of user accounts. Identity Protection identifies suspicious activity, including compromised credentials, impossible travel, or atypical sign-ins. Users flagged as high-risk can then be required to complete MFA or be blocked until remediation occurs, ensuring sensitive resources are protected while minimizing impact on low-risk users. This risk-based enforcement enhances security without degrading user experience.
Security Defaults enforce MFA for all users uniformly, which can inconvenience low-risk users and does not target high-risk accounts specifically.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts and does not enforce adaptive MFA based on risk signals for standard users.
Dynamic Groups manage memberships based on attributes such as department or role but do not enforce authentication policies or respond to risk events.
Conditional Access using Identity Protection risk signals is correct because it enables organizations to apply MFA selectively based on account risk. High-risk users face additional authentication challenges or are blocked until remediation, while normal users retain seamless access. Reporting and audit capabilities provide visibility into risky sign-ins, policy enforcement, and mitigation actions, supporting compliance and governance. This approach creates an intelligent, adaptive identity security framework that balances usability, security, and compliance requirements.
Question 95
A company wants new employees to be automatically assigned to application access groups based on their department and role. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Dynamic Groups
B) Access Reviews
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Dynamic Groups
Explanation:
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department, role, or location. This capability in Azure Active Directory enables organizations to automate user provisioning and streamline identity management processes. By leveraging attributes stored in the directory, administrators can define rules that evaluate users’ properties and automatically assign memberships when new employees join, or when their attributes change over time. For instance, a new employee in the “Engineering” department can automatically be placed into the Engineering group, which might provide access to project management tools, source control repositories, and collaboration platforms specific to that team. Likewise, a new hire in Marketing or Sales could be automatically added to groups granting access to analytics tools, CRM systems, and department-specific resources. This automation ensures access is aligned with the employee’s role and responsibilities, enforcing the principle of least privilege, which minimizes security risks and ensures compliance with organizational policies.
When new employees are onboarded, dynamic membership rules evaluate their attributes and provision them into the appropriate groups automatically. This eliminates the need for manual intervention from IT administrators, reducing the time and effort required to provide access to new hires. Employees gain immediate access to the applications and resources they need to perform their roles effectively, enhancing productivity from day one. Dynamic Groups also handle changes in user attributes automatically. For example, if an employee transfers from Finance to Human Resources, their memberships can automatically update to reflect the new department, removing access to Finance resources while granting access to HR applications. This ensures access remains current, accurate, and aligned with organizational policies without requiring manual oversight.
Access Reviews complement Dynamic Groups by providing governance and compliance oversight. Access Reviews allow administrators or designated managers to evaluate whether users still require the access they have been granted. They identify over-provisioned accounts, dormant users, and unnecessary permissions that may exist due to role changes or departures. While critical for maintaining security and ensuring regulatory compliance, Access Reviews do not automatically assign new employees to groups. They are retrospective rather than proactive, designed to remove or adjust access rather than provision it. By combining Dynamic Groups with Access Reviews, organizations achieve a comprehensive identity lifecycle management approach: Dynamic Groups manage automated provisioning and onboarding, while Access Reviews ensure ongoing compliance, security, and policy adherence.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) focuses on elevated roles for internal users. PIM allows just-in-time access to privileged accounts, enforces approval workflows, tracks activation history, and ensures that privileged users undergo multi-factor authentication when activating elevated roles. While PIM is critical for securing administrative accounts and controlling elevated permissions, it does not handle the automated assignment of standard users to groups based on attributes. Its focus is governance of sensitive accounts rather than provisioning everyday access. Dynamic Groups complement PIM by providing automated access for standard users, ensuring that all employees are correctly assigned to groups and applications based on their job functions.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies and device compliance requirements, such as multi-factor authentication, location-based restrictions, and device compliance checks. Conditional Access ensures that only users who meet security requirements can access corporate resources, adding a layer of adaptive security. However, it does not automatically provision group memberships for new employees. While Conditional Access and Dynamic Groups address different aspects of identity management, they are complementary. Dynamic Groups handle automated assignment of resources, whereas Conditional Access ensures that only authenticated and compliant users gain access to those resources, creating a secure, efficient, and adaptive environment.
Dynamic Groups are the correct solution for streamlining onboarding and automating access provisioning. By automatically assigning users to groups based on directory attributes, organizations ensure that new employees are granted the correct permissions immediately. This reduces human error, minimizes administrative workload, and ensures that access is consistent across the organization. Integration with Access Packages enhances this process by bundling multiple applications, groups, and resources into a single workflow. For example, a new finance associate could be automatically added to the Finance group and receive access to accounting software, shared drives, reporting tools, and collaboration channels in a single automated workflow. This integration reduces administrative effort, improves consistency, and ensures that access aligns with job responsibilities.
Reporting and auditing capabilities in Azure AD provide administrators with visibility into group memberships, access assignments, and policy compliance. These tools allow organizations to track which users have access to which resources, identify discrepancies, and validate that access policies are enforced correctly. Reporting is especially important in regulated industries, where demonstrating adherence to internal policies and external regulatory requirements is critical. By combining automated provisioning with visibility and audit capabilities, Dynamic Groups ensure a secure, compliant, and transparent access management system.
Dynamic Groups also support scalability and operational efficiency. As organizations grow, the number of users, applications, and resources increases, making manual provisioning impractical. Dynamic Groups scale automatically, handling onboarding, attribute changes, and role transitions without additional administrative overhead. Employees receive accurate access to resources in real time, regardless of organizational size or complexity. This reduces errors, ensures consistent policy enforcement, and enhances overall operational efficiency. Additionally, Dynamic Groups maintain a secure identity management framework that supports organizational growth, role-based access control, and compliance requirements.
Dynamic Groups are essential for automated, attribute-driven access management. They ensure accurate provisioning of new employees, reduce administrative effort, enforce least-privilege principles, and maintain consistent access across the organization. When integrated with Access Packages, Conditional Access, and Access Reviews, Dynamic Groups form a comprehensive identity management ecosystem that supports secure, efficient onboarding, operational scalability, and regulatory compliance. By leveraging automated group assignment, organizations can streamline access provisioning, minimize errors, enhance productivity, and maintain a robust, scalable, and secure identity management framework capable of supporting organizational growth and complex operational requirements.
Question 96
A company wants to enforce that only devices marked compliant in Intune can access corporate email. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies with device compliance enable organizations to enforce access controls based on device health and compliance status. By integrating Intune-managed devices with Azure AD, only devices meeting specific security requirements such as encryption, OS updates, antivirus protection, and security configuration are granted access to corporate email. Non-compliant or unmanaged devices can be blocked, redirected for remediation, or prompted to meet compliance requirements, reducing the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. This adaptive approach balances user productivity with organizational security.
Security Defaults enforce baseline security measures such as mandatory MFA for all users but do not evaluate the compliance or management state of devices. This limits their ability to enforce conditional access policies tailored to device health.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts and provides just-in-time access workflows. It does not enforce access based on device compliance for standard users or email applications.
Access Reviews allow periodic evaluation of user access to applications and groups but do not enforce real-time access controls based on device compliance. They are better suited for governance and periodic auditing rather than adaptive access enforcement.
Conditional Access with device compliance policies is correct because it allows IT administrators to define rules that enforce secure access while monitoring compliance levels. Policies can include additional conditions such as location, user risk, and application sensitivity. Administrators can also generate reports to track compliance trends, detect non-compliant devices, and take corrective actions. This ensures only trusted, compliant devices access sensitive resources, mitigating security risks, and maintaining regulatory compliance, while providing a seamless experience for end-users who meet organizational standards.
Question 97
A company wants to review user access to high-risk applications every 60 days and remove unnecessary permissions automatically. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Access Reviews
B) Conditional Access
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Access Reviews
Explanation:
Access Reviews allow organizations to periodically evaluate and validate user access to applications, groups, and roles. By conducting reviews every 60 days, administrators and application owners can ensure that only authorized users retain access to high-risk applications. Automated removal of unnecessary access reduces security risks associated with over-provisioned accounts, enforces least-privilege principles, and helps maintain compliance with internal policies and external regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO standards. Notifications, reminders, and audit trails improve review completion rates and governance transparency, providing accountability and traceability.
Conditional Access enforces authentication controls such as MFA, device compliance, or location-based policies but does not periodically review existing access or automatically remove unnecessary permissions.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users but does not evaluate standard user access to high-risk applications on a recurring basis.
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes but do not perform periodic access validation or enforce removal of unnecessary access.
Access Reviews are correct because they combine automation, governance, and auditability. Integration with Dynamic Groups and Access Packages streamlines onboarding and offboarding while maintaining appropriate access for each user. Reporting provides insight into who reviewed access, the actions taken, and the justification for removing permissions. This proactive approach ensures that access to high-risk applications is regularly validated, reduces the attack surface, and maintains a secure, compliant, and efficient identity management framework.
Question 98
A company wants to grant temporary, approved access to external contractors for multiple applications with automatic expiration. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Dynamic Groups
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
Explanation:
Azure AD B2B collaboration enables secure external access for contractors, partners, or vendors. Access Packages in Entitlement Management allow organizations to bundle multiple resources, including applications, groups, and SharePoint sites, into a single requestable package. Approval workflows ensure that access is granted only after validation, and automatic expiration policies remove access when it is no longer required, minimizing security risks from lingering permissions. This approach supports secure external collaboration while maintaining compliance and governance standards.
Privileged Identity Management focuses on managing temporary elevated roles for internal users and does not provide approval-based, temporary access provisioning for external contractors.
Dynamic Groups automate membership assignments based on user attributes such as department or role but do not handle approval workflows or enforce expiration policies for external users.
Conditional Access enforces authentication requirements such as MFA or device compliance but does not manage access provisioning, approvals, or temporary external access.
Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages is correct because it provides a secure, automated framework for granting and revoking temporary access. Integration with Conditional Access ensures additional security measures like MFA or device compliance. Audit logs track all requests, approvals, and expirations, offering visibility and compliance. This ensures external contractors can perform necessary tasks without compromising organizational security, and access is automatically revoked after the defined duration, reducing risk and administrative overhead.
Question 99
A company wants to require multi-factor authentication only for users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should they implement?
A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals allow organizations to implement adaptive, risk-based authentication. Identity Protection evaluates user accounts for suspicious activity, including compromised credentials, unusual sign-ins, and impossible travel. Users identified as high-risk are required to perform MFA or are blocked until the risk is mitigated, protecting sensitive resources while reducing friction for low-risk users. This targeted approach enhances security without impacting overall user experience.
Security Defaults enforce MFA for all users uniformly, which may inconvenience low-risk users and does not provide selective enforcement based on real-time risk levels.
Privileged Identity Management manages just-in-time access for privileged users but does not enforce adaptive MFA for standard users based on risk signals.
Dynamic Groups manage group membership based on attributes but do not implement authentication policies or respond to risk events.
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection signals are correct because they provide real-time, adaptive authentication controls. High-risk users face MFA challenges or are blocked until remediation, while normal users retain seamless access. Reports and audit logs provide visibility into risky sign-ins, enforcement actions, and mitigations, supporting compliance. This ensures a proactive, intelligent identity security strategy that balances security, usability, and regulatory requirements.
Question 100
A company wants new employees to be automatically assigned to application access groups based on their department and role. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Dynamic Groups
B) Access Reviews
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Dynamic Groups
Explanation:
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department, role, or location. This feature in Azure Active Directory provides organizations with a highly efficient and scalable method for managing access to applications and resources. By leveraging directory attributes, administrators can define rules that evaluate user properties and automatically assign group memberships when new employees are onboarded or when existing users’ attributes change. For example, a new employee in the Finance department can automatically be placed in the Finance group, granting access to accounting software, financial reporting dashboards, and department-specific collaboration channels. Similarly, a Marketing employee can be assigned to groups granting access to campaign management tools, analytics platforms, and team collaboration resources. This automation ensures that access is aligned with the user’s job responsibilities, enforcing the principle of least privilege. By limiting access to only what is necessary for the role, organizations reduce security risks, protect sensitive data, and maintain compliance with industry regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO standards.
When new employees join, dynamic membership rules immediately provision them into the correct groups, granting access to the applications and resources they need to perform their job effectively. This eliminates the need for manual provisioning by IT administrators, reducing delays and minimizing errors that commonly occur in manual workflows. The immediate availability of required resources enhances employee productivity and ensures a smooth onboarding experience. Dynamic Groups also provide flexibility for organizational changes. For example, if an employee transfers from Sales to Operations, their group memberships can automatically adjust, removing access to Sales tools and granting access to Operations resources. This ensures that access is always accurate, up-to-date, and consistent with the employee’s current responsibilities without requiring manual intervention or oversight.
Access Reviews complement Dynamic Groups by providing governance and compliance oversight. Access Reviews enable administrators or managers to periodically evaluate whether users still require the access they have been granted. These reviews are particularly useful in identifying over-provisioned accounts, dormant users, or employees who have changed roles and no longer need certain resources. While Access Reviews are essential for auditing and maintaining regulatory compliance, they do not provide automated provisioning for new employees. Access Reviews function retrospectively, focusing on removing unnecessary access rather than granting it proactively. By integrating Dynamic Groups with Access Reviews, organizations can implement a comprehensive identity lifecycle management system: Dynamic Groups manage automated onboarding and provisioning, while Access Reviews ensure ongoing compliance and security governance.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) manages temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users. PIM enforces approval workflows, requires multi-factor authentication, and tracks activation history for auditing purposes. Although PIM is critical for securing administrative or elevated accounts, it does not automatically assign standard users to groups based on attributes. Its primary focus is governance and controlling access to sensitive roles rather than managing day-to-day access provisioning for general employees. Dynamic Groups complement PIM by ensuring that standard employees are automatically assigned to the appropriate groups for their roles, allowing PIM to focus on managing elevated permissions securely and efficiently.
Conditional Access enforces authentication and device compliance policies, such as multi-factor authentication, location-based restrictions, and device compliance checks. Conditional Access ensures that only compliant and authenticated users can access organizational resources, providing a layer of adaptive security. However, it does not manage group memberships or automatically provision new employees. While Conditional Access is essential for enforcing security policies and mitigating risk, it operates independently of Dynamic Groups. Together, Dynamic Groups and Conditional Access provide a complete identity and access management solution, where Dynamic Groups automate provisioning and group assignments, and Conditional Access ensures that only authorized and compliant users can access resources.
Dynamic Groups are the correct solution for streamlining onboarding and ensuring proper access provisioning. By automatically assigning users to groups based on their attributes, organizations reduce the administrative burden, minimize errors, and provide consistent access across all applications and resources. Integration with Access Packages further enhances this process by bundling multiple resources, such as applications, groups, and permissions, into a single automated workflow. For example, a new IT analyst could automatically be added to the IT group and simultaneously receive access to monitoring tools, ticketing systems, and internal documentation through a single Access Package. This approach significantly simplifies onboarding, improves operational efficiency, and ensures accurate access provisioning without manual intervention.
Reporting and auditing capabilities within Azure AD provide administrators with visibility into group memberships, access assignments, and policy compliance. These tools allow IT teams to monitor which users have access to which resources, verify adherence to organizational policies, and generate audit reports for compliance purposes. Dynamic Groups, when combined with reporting, enable organizations to maintain transparency and control over access management, ensuring security governance and alignment with compliance requirements. This visibility is particularly valuable in regulated industries, where organizations must demonstrate proper access controls and ongoing policy enforcement.
Dynamic Groups also support scalability and operational efficiency. As organizations grow and add more users, applications, and resources, manual provisioning becomes increasingly complex and error-prone. Dynamic Groups automatically scale with organizational growth, adjusting memberships in real time based on attribute changes, onboarding events, or departmental transfers. Employees consistently receive appropriate access, reducing administrative effort and improving overall operational efficiency. This capability ensures that the identity management framework remains robust, secure, and scalable, capable of supporting both organizational expansion and evolving role structures.
Dynamic Groups are essential for automated, attribute-based access management in Azure Active Directory. They provide accurate and consistent provisioning of new employees, enforce least-privilege principles, reduce administrative effort, and ensure that access is aligned with job responsibilities. When integrated with Access Packages, Conditional Access, and Access Reviews, Dynamic Groups form a comprehensive, secure, and scalable identity management ecosystem. This approach streamlines onboarding, minimizes errors, enhances operational efficiency, and supports governance and compliance requirements. By automating group memberships based on directory attributes, organizations maintain a robust identity management framework capable of supporting growth, operational complexity, and evolving access requirements, all while ensuring security and adherence to organizational policies.
Question 101
A company wants to enforce that only compliant and managed devices can access SharePoint Online. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A) Conditional Access with device compliance policies
Explanation:
Conditional Access with device compliance policies allows organizations to enforce access based on device health and management. By integrating with Intune or another MDM solution, only devices that meet compliance requirements—such as encryption, OS updates, antivirus protection, and proper configuration—can access SharePoint Online. Devices that are non-compliant or unmanaged can be blocked, redirected for remediation, or prompted to meet compliance requirements. This approach ensures sensitive data is protected while maintaining productivity for users on compliant devices.
Security Defaults provide baseline security measures, such as enforcing MFA for all users, but do not evaluate device compliance or enforce conditional access based on device health, making them insufficient for this scenario.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for privileged accounts and provides just-in-time access workflows. It does not enforce device compliance for standard users or SharePoint Online access.
Access Reviews periodically evaluate user access but do not enforce real-time access controls based on device compliance or management state. They are primarily used for governance and auditing.
Conditional Access with device compliance policies is correct because it allows administrators to enforce adaptive access rules, combining device compliance with user, location, and application-based conditions. IT teams can monitor compliance trends, remediate non-compliant devices, and generate detailed reports for auditing. This ensures that only trusted devices access sensitive resources, reduces exposure to data breaches, and supports organizational security and compliance requirements.
Question 102
A company wants to review and remove unnecessary user access to financial applications every 30 days. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Access Reviews
B) Conditional Access
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Access Reviews
Explanation:
Access Reviews in Azure AD allow organizations to periodically evaluate user access to applications, groups, and roles. By conducting reviews every 30 days, administrators and application owners can ensure that only authorized users retain access to financial applications, reducing the risk of over-provisioned permissions and enforcing least-privilege principles. Automated removal of unnecessary access supports compliance with internal policies and external regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX. Access Reviews also provide notifications, reminders, and audit logs, ensuring accountability and transparency for compliance audits.
Conditional Access enforces authentication policies, such as MFA or device compliance, but does not periodically evaluate existing access or remove unnecessary permissions automatically.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users but does not conduct recurring reviews for standard user access to applications.
Dynamic Groups assign users to groups based on attributes like department or role, but they do not perform periodic evaluations or automatically revoke unnecessary access.
Access Reviews are correct because they provide automation, governance, and auditability. Integration with Dynamic Groups and Access Packages can streamline onboarding and offboarding processes. Reporting and audit logs track review outcomes, decisions made, and actions taken, ensuring proper access governance. This approach strengthens security, maintains compliance, and ensures operational efficiency.
Question 103
A company wants to grant temporary access to external vendors for multiple applications with approval and automatic expiration. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Dynamic Groups
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages
Explanation:
Azure AD B2B collaboration enables secure, temporary access for external vendors, contractors, or partners. Access Packages in Entitlement Management allow multiple resources—including applications, groups, and SharePoint sites—to be bundled into a single requestable package. Approval workflows ensure that access is granted only after validation, and automatic expiration policies remove access when it is no longer required, reducing security risks and administrative overhead. This approach supports secure external collaboration while maintaining governance and compliance.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles for internal users and just-in-time access but does not handle temporary external access or approvals.
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes but do not enforce approval workflows or manage temporary external access.
Conditional Access enforces authentication controls, such as MFA or device compliance, but does not handle access provisioning, approvals, or expiration for external users.
Azure AD B2B collaboration with Access Packages is correct because it provides a secure, automated framework for granting and revoking temporary external access. Integration with Conditional Access allows additional security measures like MFA or device compliance. Audit logs ensure visibility and compliance, documenting requests, approvals, and expirations. This ensures vendors can collaborate efficiently without compromising organizational security or data integrity.
Question 104
A company wants to require MFA only for users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should they implement?
A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
B) Security Defaults
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Dynamic Groups
Answer: A) Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection risk signals provide adaptive authentication based on user risk. Identity Protection detects suspicious activities, including compromised credentials, unusual sign-ins, and impossible travel events, and flags users as high-risk. Conditional Access policies enforce MFA or block access for high-risk accounts while allowing low-risk users to access applications seamlessly. This adaptive approach minimizes disruption while maintaining security for sensitive resources.
Security Defaults enforce MFA for all users uniformly, which may inconvenience low-risk users and does not provide selective enforcement based on risk detection.
Privileged Identity Management manages temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged accounts but does not enforce MFA based on risk signals for standard users.
Dynamic Groups manage group membership based on attributes such as department or role but do not enforce authentication policies or respond to risk events.
Conditional Access policies using Identity Protection signals are correct because they enable organizations to implement intelligent, risk-aware authentication. High-risk users must complete MFA or remediate issues, while low-risk users experience seamless access. Reporting and audit capabilities provide visibility into risky sign-ins, enforcement actions, and mitigations, ensuring compliance. This approach strengthens security, reduces exposure to compromised accounts, and maintains a proactive identity protection strategy that balances usability, security, and regulatory requirements.
Question 105
A company wants new employees to be automatically assigned to application access groups based on their department and role. Which Azure AD feature should they implement?
A) Dynamic Groups
B) Access Reviews
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Conditional Access
Answer: A) Dynamic Groups
Explanation:
Dynamic Groups automatically assign users to groups based on attributes such as department, role, or location. This capability in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) provides organizations with a powerful tool for automating identity and access management. By leveraging user attributes, administrators can define rules that evaluate employee properties and automatically assign group memberships when new employees are onboarded or when existing users’ attributes change. For example, when a new employee joins the Finance department, dynamic membership rules can automatically assign them to the Finance group, granting access to accounting systems, departmental file shares, and collaboration platforms. Similarly, employees in Sales or Marketing can be provisioned into the appropriate groups, providing immediate access to CRM tools, analytics platforms, and team communication channels. This attribute-based automation ensures that access is consistently aligned with the employee’s responsibilities, enforcing the principle of least privilege and reducing the risk of over-permissioned accounts.
When new employees are onboarded, dynamic membership rules evaluate their attributes and provision them into the appropriate groups automatically. This eliminates the need for IT administrators to manually assign group memberships, reducing administrative overhead and minimizing potential errors. Immediate provisioning allows new employees to access necessary resources on their first day, improving productivity and accelerating onboarding. Dynamic Groups also automatically adapt to changes in user attributes. For instance, if an employee moves from Human Resources to Operations, their group memberships can update automatically, removing access to HR-specific resources and granting access to Operations applications. This dynamic behavior ensures that access remains accurate and consistent throughout the employee lifecycle without requiring manual intervention, providing both efficiency and security.
Access Reviews complement Dynamic Groups by providing ongoing governance and compliance monitoring. Access Reviews allow administrators to periodically evaluate whether users still require the access they have been granted. They are particularly useful for identifying dormant accounts, over-provisioned users, and those who have changed roles and no longer need access to certain applications or resources. While Access Reviews are essential for auditing and regulatory compliance, they do not provide automated provisioning for new employees. Access Reviews are primarily retrospective, focusing on removing unnecessary access rather than proactively assigning it. When combined with Dynamic Groups, organizations can maintain a comprehensive identity lifecycle management framework: Dynamic Groups handle automatic onboarding and access provisioning, while Access Reviews ensure ongoing compliance and policy enforcement.
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) manages temporary elevated roles and just-in-time access for privileged users. PIM provides mechanisms such as approval workflows, time-limited role activation, and multi-factor authentication to secure privileged accounts. While PIM is critical for governing high-privilege access and reducing risks associated with standing administrative privileges, it does not automate standard user group assignments. Its focus is on managing elevated access securely rather than provisioning everyday access for general employees. Dynamic Groups complement PIM by ensuring that standard users are automatically assigned to the correct groups for their roles, allowing administrators to focus on governance and security of privileged accounts while maintaining operational efficiency for regular user access.
Conditional Access enforces authentication and device compliance policies, including multi-factor authentication, location-based restrictions, and compliance checks for managed devices. Conditional Access ensures that only users who meet the required security conditions can access corporate resources, enhancing adaptive security. However, Conditional Access does not handle automated group assignments for new employees. While it secures access, it operates independently from the provisioning capabilities of Dynamic Groups. Together, Dynamic Groups and Conditional Access provide a comprehensive identity management solution: Dynamic Groups automate access assignment, while Conditional Access ensures that only authenticated and compliant users can reach those resources.
Dynamic Groups are the correct solution for streamlining onboarding and ensuring accurate access provisioning. By automatically assigning employees to groups based on their attributes, organizations can reduce administrative workload, minimize errors, and ensure consistency in access policies. Integration with Access Packages enhances this functionality by allowing multiple resources—such as applications, groups, and permissions—to be bundled into a single automated workflow. For instance, a new marketing employee could be automatically added to the Marketing group and simultaneously provisioned with access to email distribution lists, project management tools, CRM platforms, and shared documentation through a single Access Package. This integrated approach reduces manual effort, improves operational efficiency, and ensures that access provisioning aligns precisely with job responsibilities.
Reporting and auditing capabilities within Azure AD provide administrators with visibility into group memberships, access assignments, and policy compliance. These features allow organizations to track who has access to which resources, validate that access aligns with organizational policies, and generate audit reports for internal governance or regulatory requirements. Visibility into access assignments ensures accountability and allows IT teams to quickly detect and remediate any misconfigurations or discrepancies. When combined with automated provisioning through Dynamic Groups, this provides a secure, transparent, and compliant identity management framework.
Dynamic Groups also support scalability and organizational growth. As companies expand, the number of users, applications, and resources increases, making manual provisioning both complex and error-prone. Dynamic Groups automatically scale to meet growing demands, adjusting memberships in real time based on attribute changes, onboarding events, or departmental transfers. This capability ensures that employees consistently receive appropriate access regardless of organization size, improving operational efficiency and minimizing security risks. By automating group assignments, organizations maintain a robust identity management framework capable of supporting evolving business structures, departmental changes, and workforce expansion.
Dynamic Groups are essential for automated, attribute-driven access management in Azure Active Directory. They provide immediate, accurate provisioning for new employees, enforce least-privilege principles, reduce administrative effort, and maintain consistent access policies across the organization. When integrated with Access Packages, Conditional Access, and Access Reviews, Dynamic Groups form a comprehensive, secure, and scalable identity management ecosystem. This approach streamlines onboarding, minimizes errors, improves operational efficiency, and ensures compliance with governance policies. By automating group assignments based on user attributes, organizations maintain a secure, scalable, and efficient identity management framework capable of supporting growth, role-based access control, and complex operational requirements.