Visit here for our full ServiceNow CIS-CSM exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 181:
An administrator needs to configure proactive customer outreach when service incidents affect multiple customers. Which CSM feature should be used?
A) Mass Notification
B) Proactive Customer Service Operations
C) Broadcast Messaging
D) Customer Communication Manager
Answer: B
Explanation:
Proactive Customer Service Operations (proactive CSO) is the CSM feature that should be used to configure proactive customer outreach when service incidents affect multiple customers. This capability enables organizations to identify incidents or problems that impact multiple customers and automatically reach out to affected customers before they contact support, providing transparency about known issues, expected resolution times, and workarounds. Proactive communication significantly improves customer satisfaction by demonstrating awareness and accountability while reducing inbound case volume for known issues.
Proactive CSO works by monitoring incident and problem records for patterns indicating widespread impact. When qualifying incidents are identified (such as service outages, system failures, or defects affecting multiple users), the system can automatically identify which customer accounts are impacted based on their product usage, service subscriptions, or geographic location. Administrators configure communication templates with appropriate messaging about the situation, impact details, and resolution status. The system then distributes these communications through multiple channels including email, SMS, portal notifications, or in-app messages to keep customers informed throughout the incident lifecycle.
The feature includes workflow automation that sends initial notifications when incidents are confirmed, provides periodic updates as resolution progresses, and sends final closure notifications when service is restored. Proactive CSO also creates associated case records for each affected customer, pre-populating case details with incident information and linking cases to the underlying problem record. This enables agents to efficiently handle follow-up inquiries with complete context. The system tracks which customers received notifications and can suppress duplicate case creation for issues customers have been notified about, reducing redundant work.
Mass Notification is generic terminology. Broadcast Messaging is not a specific ServiceNow feature. Customer Communication Manager does not exist as a standard feature. Proactive Customer Service Operations is the specific CSM capability for automated, incident-based customer outreach and communication.
Question 182:
Which role is required to configure and manage knowledge bases in ServiceNow CSM?
A) knowledge_admin
B) csm_admin
C) knowledge_manager
D) admin
Answer: C
Explanation:
The knowledge_manager role is required to configure and manage knowledge bases in ServiceNow CSM. This specialized role provides the permissions necessary to create and organize knowledge bases, configure article workflows and approval processes, manage knowledge categories and taxonomies, set up article lifecycle policies, and control access to knowledge content across different user groups. The knowledge_manager role is distinct from general administrative roles, focusing specifically on the governance and operational management of organizational knowledge assets.
Knowledge managers using this role can perform critical functions including creating new knowledge bases for different purposes or departments, defining publication workflows that route articles through subject matter experts and approvers before publishing, configuring retirement schedules that flag outdated articles for review, setting up feedback mechanisms to capture article usefulness ratings, and establishing content ownership assignments. Knowledge managers also configure which knowledge bases are visible to different audiences such as internal agents versus external customers, ensuring appropriate content access controls.
The role enables knowledge managers to monitor knowledge base health through metrics and reports showing article usage, search effectiveness, content gaps where searches yield no results, and author contribution levels. Knowledge managers can retire obsolete articles, resolve duplicate content, and ensure knowledge quality through periodic content audits. The role also permits configuring knowledge block creation, which defines reusable content components that maintain consistency across multiple articles when product specifications or procedures change.
The knowledge_admin role exists but has broader administrative capabilities beyond typical management needs. The csm_admin role manages CSM configuration but does not specifically grant knowledge management capabilities. The admin role has system-wide permissions but knowledge_manager is the appropriate scoped role for knowledge base management. Using appropriately scoped roles follows security best practices by granting minimum necessary permissions.
Question 183:
An organization wants to automatically route cases to different teams based on product category and customer location. Which two components are needed? (Choose two)
A) Assignment Rules
B) Data Lookup Rules
C) Routing Groups
D) Work Assignment
E) Service Channels
Answer: A, D
Explanation:
Both Assignment Rules and Work Assignment are needed to automatically route cases to different teams based on product category and customer location in ServiceNow CSM. These components work together to evaluate case attributes and intelligently distribute work items to the most appropriate teams and agents. While Assignment Rules provide basic routing logic, Work Assignment adds sophisticated capabilities including skill matching, capacity management, and workload balancing that ensure efficient case distribution across complex organizational structures.
Assignment Rules define the routing logic by specifying conditions that must be met for cases to be routed to particular assignment groups or individuals. Administrators create rules with criteria such as “if product category equals Hardware AND customer location equals North America, assign to NA Hardware Support Team.” Rules can be ordered by priority, with the system evaluating conditions sequentially until a match is found. Assignment Rules support complex criteria using AND/OR logic, field comparisons, and script-based conditions for sophisticated routing scenarios that consider multiple case attributes simultaneously.
Work Assignment enhances this basic routing with intelligent distribution capabilities. Once Assignment Rules determine the appropriate team or queue, Work Assignment identifies which specific agents within that team should receive cases based on their current availability, skill levels, workload capacity, and business priorities. Work Assignment can balance work across team members, ensure agents are not overloaded, match cases requiring specialized skills to qualified agents, and provide real-time routing that adjusts as agent status changes throughout the day.
Data Lookup Rules retrieve information but do not route cases. Routing Groups is not a standard ServiceNow component. Service Channels define communication methods but not routing logic. The combination of Assignment Rules for routing logic and Work Assignment for intelligent distribution provides comprehensive automated case routing capabilities in ServiceNow CSM.
Question 184:
Which table stores the communication history between agents and customers for a case?
A) customer_communication
B) interaction
C) correspondence
D) sys_email
Answer: B
Explanation:
The interaction table stores the communication history between agents and customers for cases in ServiceNow CSM. This table captures all interactions across various communication channels including emails, phone calls, chats, portal messages, and social media exchanges, creating a comprehensive communication timeline associated with each case record. The interaction table provides complete visibility into the customer conversation history, enabling agents to understand previous discussions, commitments made, and solutions attempted without requiring customers to repeat information.
Interaction records contain essential details about each communication including the interaction type (email, phone, chat), timestamp showing when the interaction occurred, direction indicating whether it was inbound from the customer or outbound from the agent, the communication content or summary, participating parties, duration for phone calls, and the related case record. Interactions are displayed chronologically within the case form through related lists or timeline views, providing agents with easy access to complete communication context when working on cases.
The interaction table’s design supports multi-channel customer service by normalizing communications from different sources into a consistent data structure. When customers send emails, they create interaction records. When agents make phone calls and log call details, those create interaction records. When chat conversations occur, transcripts are stored as interaction records. This unified approach enables powerful capabilities like searching across all communication types, reporting on channel usage and effectiveness, and providing customers with complete interaction history through the Customer Service Portal.
Customer_communication is not a standard table name. Correspondence is generic terminology. The sys_email table stores email records but does not capture other interaction types like phone calls or chats. The interaction table is the specific, comprehensive repository for multi-channel communication history in ServiceNow CSM, making it essential for maintaining complete customer conversation context.
Question 185:
An administrator needs to configure automated responses to common customer inquiries without agent involvement. Which feature should be implemented?
A) Chatbot
B) Virtual Agent
C) Automated Responses
D) Quick Replies
Answer: B
Explanation:
Virtual Agent is the feature that should be implemented to configure automated responses to common customer inquiries without agent involvement in ServiceNow CSM. Virtual Agent is an intelligent conversational AI system that engages with customers through natural language dialog, understands their questions and requests, provides relevant information or solutions, and can even perform actions like creating cases, checking order status, or resetting passwords. Virtual Agent significantly reduces agent workload by handling routine inquiries autonomously while escalating complex issues to human agents when necessary.
Virtual Agent uses natural language understanding (NLU) to interpret customer intent from conversational input rather than requiring customers to navigate rigid menu structures or use exact keywords. Customers can describe their needs in their own words, and Virtual Agent identifies the appropriate topic based on trained conversation models. Each topic represents a specific type of inquiry or request with defined conversation flows that guide the interaction. Topics include decision trees with branching logic based on customer responses, integration with knowledge articles to provide answers, and service catalog integration to fulfill requests.
The Virtual Agent can be deployed across multiple channels including the Customer Service Portal, mobile applications, Microsoft Teams, Slack, and other messaging platforms, providing consistent automated support wherever customers prefer to engage. Conversation designers configure topics through a visual interface that defines dialog flow, response messages, conditional logic, and integration points with ServiceNow functionality. Virtual Agent continuously improves through machine learning, analyzing which topics successfully resolve inquiries and where customers abandon conversations, enabling administrators to refine topics for better effectiveness.
Chatbot is generic terminology while Virtual Agent is the specific ServiceNow product. Automated Responses is too general. Quick Replies are agent efficiency tools, not customer-facing automation. Virtual Agent is the comprehensive conversational AI feature for automated, intelligent customer inquiry handling in ServiceNow CSM.
Question 186:
Which metric measures the percentage of cases resolved on first contact without escalation or follow-up?
A) First Call Resolution (FCR)
B) First Contact Resolution Rate
C) Resolution Rate
D) Case Closure Rate
Answer: B
Explanation:
First Contact Resolution Rate is the metric that measures the percentage of cases resolved on first contact without escalation or follow-up in ServiceNow CSM. This critical performance indicator reflects how effectively agents resolve customer issues during the initial interaction, whether through phone, chat, email, or other channels. High first contact resolution rates indicate efficient problem-solving, knowledgeable agents, effective support tools, and well-designed processes, all of which contribute to superior customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.
First Contact Resolution Rate is calculated by dividing the number of cases resolved during first contact by the total number of cases created, then multiplying by 100 to express as a percentage. The metric requires careful definition of what constitutes “first contact resolution” in the organization’s context. Typically, a case qualifies as first contact resolved if it moves from open to resolved or closed status without being reassigned to different groups, reopened after initial closure, or requiring subsequent customer-initiated follow-up interactions. Some organizations exclude certain case types from FCR calculations, such as requests that inherently require multi-step processing like order fulfillment.
Improving First Contact Resolution Rate delivers multiple business benefits including reduced operational costs by minimizing rework and follow-up handling, improved customer satisfaction as issues are resolved quickly without frustration, increased agent productivity by reducing time spent on recurring issues, and decreased case backlog. Organizations can analyze FCR by category, agent, or team to identify improvement opportunities. Low FCR for specific categories might indicate knowledge gaps, inadequate agent training, unclear procedures, or systemic product quality issues requiring attention.
First Call Resolution (FCR) is similar but specifically emphasizes phone interactions. Resolution Rate and Case Closure Rate measure different aspects of case management. First Contact Resolution Rate is the comprehensive metric encompassing all contact channels for measuring initial resolution effectiveness in ServiceNow CSM.
Question 187:
An organization needs to track service contracts and their associated service levels. Which two tables are used? (Choose two)
A) service_contract
B) contract
C) service_commitment
D) customer_contract
E) sla_commitment
Answer: A, C
Explanation:
The service_contract and service_commitment tables are used to track service contracts and their associated service levels in ServiceNow CSM. These tables work together to represent the contractual agreements between organizations and their customers, defining what services will be provided, at what performance levels, and under what terms. Understanding this data model is essential for properly configuring contract management, entitlements, and SLA enforcement in CSM implementations.
The service_contract table stores the master contract information including the customer account, contract start and end dates, contract value, payment terms, renewal information, contract status (active, expired, terminated), and references to contract documents. Service contracts represent the overarching agreement between the organization and customer, serving as the parent record that groups related service commitments. Each customer account can have multiple service contracts for different products, service types, or time periods. The service_contract table enables tracking of contract lifecycle from negotiation through execution, renewal, and eventual expiration.
The service_commitment table stores the specific service level commitments within each contract. A single service contract typically contains multiple service commitments, each defining particular service aspects like response times, resolution times, availability guarantees, or support coverage hours. Service commitment records specify measurable targets (such as 4-hour response time for priority 1 cases or 99.9 percent system uptime), the services or products covered by each commitment, and applicable conditions or exclusions. Service commitments link to SLA definitions that monitor and enforce these commitments during case processing.
The generic contract table exists in ServiceNow but service_contract is the CSM-specific table. Customer_contract and sla_commitment are not standard table names. The service_contract and service_commitment tables together provide the complete contract and service level data model for ServiceNow CSM implementations.
Question 188:
Which CSM feature provides agents with a unified interface showing all relevant case information and tools in a single screen?
A) Agent Desktop
B) Agent Workspace
C) Case Console
D) Unified Agent Interface
Answer: B
Explanation:
Agent Workspace is the CSM feature that provides agents with a unified interface showing all relevant case information and tools in a single screen. Agent Workspace represents ServiceNow’s modern, purpose-built agent experience designed to maximize productivity by consolidating everything agents need into an intuitive, configurable interface that minimizes navigation, reduces cognitive load, and enables efficient case resolution. The workspace interface has become the standard agent environment across ServiceNow customer service, IT service management, and other service delivery applications.
Agent Workspace presents case information in a structured layout with the case form as the central focus, surrounded by contextual panels providing related information and tools. The interface includes a customer/account summary showing key customer details and relationship history, a timeline displaying all case activities and communications chronologically, recommended knowledge articles in the sidebar based on case content, visual playbooks guiding resolution processes, and quick access to additional customer records like other open cases or entitlements. Agents can work on multiple cases simultaneously through tabbed navigation without losing context when switching between records.
The workspace is highly configurable, allowing administrators to define which components appear for different case types, agent roles, or business processes. Macros enable one-click execution of common multi-step actions like assigning cases and sending template responses. The interface integrates with Virtual Agent, allowing agents to monitor bot conversations and seamlessly take over when escalation is needed. Performance Analytics widgets can display personal or team metrics directly in the workspace. The modern design is responsive, providing consistent experience across desktop and mobile devices.
Agent Desktop is legacy terminology from older ServiceNow versions. Case Console is not a standard feature name. Unified Agent Interface is generic terminology. Agent Workspace is the specific, current ServiceNow feature providing the comprehensive, unified agent experience in CSM implementations.
Question 189:
An administrator needs to configure automatic case prioritization based on customer tier and issue severity. Which feature should be used?
A) Priority Rules
B) Business Rules
C) Priority Matrix
D) Automated Prioritization
Answer: B
Explanation:
Business Rules should be used to configure automatic case prioritization based on customer tier and issue severity in ServiceNow CSM. Business Rules are server-side scripts that execute when database records are inserted, updated, deleted, or queried, providing powerful automation capabilities for enforcing business logic, validating data, setting field values automatically, and triggering workflows. For case prioritization, Business Rules evaluate case attributes like customer tier and issue severity, then calculate and set the appropriate priority value according to organizational policies.
A typical case prioritization Business Rule runs before the case record is inserted or updated (using “before” timing), checks conditions like “when severity changes or customer account changes,” then executes a script that implements prioritization logic. For example, the rule might check if the customer account tier field indicates “Premium Customer” and the severity field indicates “Critical Issue,” then automatically set priority to “1 – Critical” to ensure immediate attention. The rule can implement complex matrix logic considering multiple factors including impact, urgency, customer SLA tier, product type, and business hours to determine optimal priority.
Business Rules provide advantages over manual prioritization including consistency by applying the same logic to all cases regardless of who creates them, speed by calculating priority instantly without agent intervention, accuracy by eliminating human error in priority assignment, and flexibility through script logic that can implement sophisticated prioritization algorithms considering organizational-specific factors. Rules can also trigger notifications to escalation teams when high-priority cases are created, automatically assign cases to senior agents, or initiate expedited workflows based on calculated priority.
Priority Rules is not a standard ServiceNow feature. Priority Matrix is a conceptual tool but not an automated feature. Automated Prioritization is generic terminology. Business Rules are the specific ServiceNow platform capability used to implement automatic, rule-based case prioritization logic in CSM.
Question 190:
Which table relationship connects cases to related knowledge articles in ServiceNow CSM?
A) m2m_case_knowledge
B) kb_use
C) case_kb_link
D) m2m_kb_case
Answer: A
Explanation:
The m2m_case_knowledge table creates the many-to-many relationship connecting cases to related knowledge articles in ServiceNow CSM. This relationship table enables associating multiple knowledge articles with single cases and linking single articles to multiple cases, creating bidirectional visibility between case resolution activities and knowledge content. Understanding this relationship is important for agents leveraging knowledge during case resolution, knowledge managers analyzing article effectiveness, and administrators configuring knowledge management workflows.
The m2m_case_knowledge table stores records representing each case-to-knowledge article association, containing references to both the case record and the knowledge article record. These relationship records are created when agents attach knowledge articles to cases they are working on, when automated systems suggest and link relevant articles based on case content, or when case resolutions are promoted to create new knowledge articles and maintain the connection. The relationship enables agents to quickly access articles referenced during case resolution and allows knowledge managers to see which articles are being used to resolve which types of cases.
This relationship supports important knowledge management capabilities including measuring article effectiveness by tracking how often articles contribute to case resolutions, identifying knowledge gaps by analyzing cases resolved without knowledge article usage, promoting successful case resolutions into new knowledge articles while maintaining traceability, and providing agents with “similar resolved cases” suggestions based on common knowledge article usage patterns. Reports can show which articles resolve the most cases, which case categories lack adequate knowledge coverage, and which articles are attached but not rated as helpful.
The kb_use table tracks knowledge usage but has a different structure. Case_kb_link and m2m_kb_case are not standard table names in ServiceNow. The m2m_case_knowledge table is the correct many-to-many relationship table connecting cases to knowledge articles in CSM implementations.
Question 191:
An organization wants to provide customers with estimated resolution times when they create cases. Which configuration is needed?
A) SLA Definitions
B) Resolution Time Estimates
C) Case Templates
D) Customer Expectations
Answer: A
Explanation:
SLA Definitions are needed to provide customers with estimated resolution times when they create cases in ServiceNow CSM. Service Level Agreements define the expected timeframes for responding to and resolving cases based on priority, customer tier, case category, or other criteria. When properly configured, SLA Definitions enable the system to display estimated resolution times to customers in portal interfaces during case submission, in confirmation emails after case creation, and in case status views, setting clear expectations about when they can anticipate their issues being resolved.
SLA Definitions specify target durations for key milestones including response time (how quickly an agent will first acknowledge the case) and resolution time (how long until the issue will be fixed). These targets vary based on case attributes, with higher-priority or premium customer cases having more aggressive SLA targets than routine inquiries. The system calculates expected resolution timestamps by adding the SLA duration to the case creation time, accounting for business hours calendars if SLAs pause outside working hours. These calculated timestamps become the estimated resolution times displayed to customers.
Displaying SLA-based estimates to customers provides several benefits including setting realistic expectations that reduce customer anxiety and follow-up inquiries, building trust through transparency about service commitments, differentiating service tiers by showing premium customers their accelerated resolution times, and creating accountability for the organization to meet published commitments. The estimates update automatically if case priority changes or SLA breaches occur, keeping customers informed of current expectations. Integration with case notifications can proactively alert customers when resolution timing changes.
Resolution Time Estimates is not a specific feature. Case Templates provide defaults but not dynamic time estimates. Customer Expectations is not a configuration element. SLA Definitions are the specific feature that calculates and provides estimated resolution times to customers based on contractual service commitments in ServiceNow CSM.
Question 192:
Which ServiceNow CSM capability allows capturing voice of the customer feedback at multiple touchpoints throughout the customer journey?
A) Customer Surveys
B) Feedback Management
C) Journey Analytics
D) Customer Satisfaction Monitoring
Answer: B
Explanation:
Feedback Management is the ServiceNow CSM capability that allows capturing voice of the customer feedback at multiple touchpoints throughout the customer journey. This comprehensive feedback system enables organizations to systematically collect, analyze, and act on customer input across various interaction points including post-case resolution surveys, proactive feedback requests, continuous feedback mechanisms embedded in portals, and event-triggered feedback collection. Feedback Management provides organizations with actionable insights into customer sentiment, experience quality, and improvement opportunities.
Feedback Management differs from simple surveying by providing a unified framework for managing feedback across the entire customer lifecycle rather than just isolated transactional touchpoints. Organizations can configure feedback collection at strategic moments including after case closure to measure satisfaction with specific interactions, after major milestones like product implementations or upgrades, periodically for ongoing relationship health assessment through Net Promoter Score or Customer Effort Score surveys, and through always-available feedback channels where customers can provide unsolicited input at any time. All feedback is centrally stored and associated with customer accounts and related records.
The system provides sophisticated feedback analysis capabilities including sentiment analysis to automatically classify feedback as positive, negative, or neutral, trend analysis showing how satisfaction evolves over time or differs across customer segments, alert mechanisms that notify managers when negative feedback is received requiring immediate attention, and closed-loop feedback processes that ensure customer concerns are acknowledged and addressed. Feedback data integrates with reporting and analytics, enabling correlation analysis between feedback scores and other metrics like case resolution time or agent performance.
Customer Surveys is a component but Feedback Management is the comprehensive capability. Journey Analytics focuses on journey mapping rather than feedback collection. Customer Satisfaction Monitoring is generic terminology. Feedback Management is the specific ServiceNow feature for systematic voice-of-customer capture throughout the customer journey in CSM.
Question 193:
An administrator needs to configure case deflection to reduce case creation by suggesting relevant knowledge articles during case submission. Where should this be configured?
A) Portal Configuration
B) Knowledge Base Settings
C) Case Creation Form
D) Customer Service Portal Widget
Answer: A
Explanation:
Portal Configuration is where case deflection should be configured to reduce case creation by suggesting relevant knowledge articles during case submission in ServiceNow CSM. Case deflection is a proactive self-service strategy that intercepts customers as they begin creating cases and presents potentially relevant knowledge articles that might resolve their issues without formal case submission. Effective case deflection reduces agent workload, accelerates customer issue resolution, and improves customer satisfaction by providing immediate answers rather than requiring customers to wait for agent assistance.
Portal Configuration includes settings that control how the case creation interface behaves when customers describe their issues. Administrators enable and configure search-as-you-type functionality that monitors what customers enter in case description fields and dynamically searches the knowledge base for relevant articles. As customers type, matching articles appear in a sidebar or overlay with titles and snippets. Customers can click articles to view full content, and if they find solutions, they can abandon case creation. The system tracks these deflection events, measuring how many customers viewed articles during case creation and how many ultimately submitted cases versus finding answers independently.
Configuration options control the deflection experience including how many characters customers must type before article suggestions appear, how many suggested articles to display, whether to show article relevance scores or ratings, whether article views are mandatory before case submission can proceed, and custom messaging encouraging customers to review articles before creating cases. Some organizations configure “soft deflection” where articles are suggested but customers can easily proceed with case creation, while others implement “hard deflection” requiring customers to explicitly confirm they reviewed articles and still need assistance.
Knowledge Base Settings control article content but not deflection behavior. Case Creation Form is the interface but Portal Configuration controls its deflection functionality. Customer Service Portal Widget is too specific. Portal Configuration is where comprehensive case deflection capabilities are enabled and configured in ServiceNow CSM.
Question 194:
Which feature in ServiceNow CSM enables agents to see a consolidated view of a customer’s assets and their associated entitlements?
A) Asset Management
B) Product Catalog
C) Customer Asset Portal
D) Customer 360
Answer: D
Explanation:
Customer 360 enables agents to see a consolidated view of a customer’s assets and their associated entitlements in ServiceNow CSM. Customer 360 provides the comprehensive customer profile that aggregates all relevant information from across the ServiceNow platform including contact details, account information, case history, communication timeline, owned products and assets, active service contracts, available entitlements, and open orders or requests. This unified view eliminates the need for agents to navigate between multiple screens or applications to understand the complete customer relationship.
The Customer 360 view specifically includes an assets section displaying all products, equipment, or licenses the customer owns or subscribes to, with details like purchase dates, warranty status, and maintenance coverage. Adjacent to asset information, Customer 360 shows associated entitlements indicating what support services, incident allocations, or service levels the customer has for each asset. This side-by-side visibility enables agents to quickly verify coverage before committing to service delivery, identify upsell opportunities for assets without premium support, and understand customer investment levels when determining appropriate service approaches.
Customer 360 is contextually available throughout the agent experience, appearing in Agent Workspace alongside case forms, accessible through quick customer lookups, and integrated into interaction screens. The interface updates in real-time as changes occur, ensuring agents always see current information. Organizations can customize Customer 360 to highlight specific information relevant to their business models, add custom fields capturing unique customer attributes, and configure which related records and metrics appear most prominently. The consolidated view significantly improves agent efficiency and enables more personalized customer interactions.
Asset Management is a separate module. Product Catalog displays available products but not customer-specific ownership. Customer Asset Portal is not a standard feature. Customer 360 is the specific comprehensive view consolidating customer assets, entitlements, and all relationship information for agent use in ServiceNow CSM.
Question 195:
An organization needs to track average speed to answer for incoming customer calls. Which metric should be monitored?
A) Average Handle Time
B) Average Response Time
C) Average Speed to Answer (ASA)
D) First Response Time
Answer: C
Explanation:
Average Speed to Answer (ASA) is the metric that should be monitored to track how quickly incoming customer calls are answered in ServiceNow CSM. ASA measures the average time customers wait in queue before an agent answers their call, calculated from when calls enter the queue until an agent connects. This metric is critical for understanding customer experience during the initial contact phase, as excessive wait times lead to customer frustration, call abandonment, and negative satisfaction scores regardless of how well issues are ultimately resolved.
ASA is calculated by summing the total wait time for all answered calls during a measurement period and dividing by the number of calls answered. For example, if 100 calls were answered with a combined wait time of 1,000 seconds, the ASA would be 10 seconds. Organizations typically set ASA targets based on industry standards and customer expectations, with many aiming for ASA below 30 seconds for standard service and below 10 seconds for premium support tiers. Monitoring ASA helps organizations make staffing decisions, adjust shift schedules to match call volume patterns, and identify periods requiring additional agent coverage.
ServiceNow CSM can integrate with telephony systems and contact center platforms to capture call queue data and calculate ASA metrics. These metrics appear in dashboards and reports showing ASA trends over time, comparisons across different agent groups or service lines, and correlation with other metrics like call volume and agent utilization. When ASA consistently exceeds targets, organizations can take corrective actions including hiring additional agents, implementing callback options to reduce queue wait, improving self-service deflection to reduce call volume, or adjusting routing rules to distribute calls more efficiently across available agents.
Average Handle Time measures total interaction duration not queue wait time. Average Response Time is generic. First Response Time typically refers to case acknowledgment not call answering. Average Speed to Answer (ASA) is the specific telephony metric for measuring customer wait time before calls are answered in ServiceNow CSM implementations.