Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-140 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 46:
A company is implementing Azure Virtual Desktop for a marketing team. The users require access to graphic-intensive applications such as Adobe Photoshop and AutoCAD. The administrator wants to provide the best performance for these applications while controlling costs. Which virtual machine configuration should the administrator deploy?
A) NVv4-series GPU-enabled virtual machines in a pooled host pool
B) B-series burstable virtual machines in a personal host pool
C) D-series general-purpose virtual machines in a pooled host pool
D) RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent profiles
Answer:
A) NVv4-series GPU-enabled virtual machines in a pooled host pool
Explanation:
Providing high-performance virtual desktops for graphics-intensive workloads requires careful selection of session host virtual machines. B-series burstable virtual machines (B) are suitable for lightweight workloads but do not provide the sustained GPU resources needed for applications like Adobe Photoshop or AutoCAD. D-series general-purpose virtual machines (C) offer balanced CPU and memory resources but lack specialized GPU acceleration required for graphics-intensive tasks. RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent profiles (D) delivers only selected applications without full GPU support and does not address the need for a high-performance graphics environment.
NVv4-series GPU-enabled virtual machines in a pooled host pool (A) provide dedicated GPU resources for each session, enabling smooth rendering of complex graphics and fast processing of 3D models. Using a pooled host pool allows multiple users to share session hosts, optimizing cost efficiency while maintaining performance for users who require GPU capabilities.
Administrators can deploy Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session or Windows 11 Enterprise multi-session images optimized for GPU workloads. FSLogix profile containers can be used to maintain user profiles and application settings across sessions, ensuring consistency and reducing logon times. Autoscaling policies can be applied to manage session host capacity based on user demand, reducing costs during off-peak hours while ensuring sufficient resources during peak periods.
Monitoring GPU utilization with Azure Monitor enables administrators to track performance, detect bottlenecks, and make adjustments to session host configurations. Network optimizations such as enabling UDP transport in the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) can further enhance the responsiveness of graphic-intensive applications.
Deploying NVv4-series virtual machines in a pooled host pool aligns with Microsoft best practices for delivering high-performance AVD environments for users with demanding graphics workloads. This configuration balances cost efficiency, user experience, and administrative manageability, ensuring that the marketing team can run complex applications effectively.
Question 47:
A company wants to provide contractors temporary access to specific applications in Azure Virtual Desktop. The contractors should not be able to save data on the session host, and all session changes should be discarded at logoff. Which configuration should the administrator implement?
A) RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent desktops in a pooled host pool
B) Personal host pool with FSLogix profile containers
C) NV-series virtual machines with full desktop access
D) Azure Key Vault integration
Answer:
A) RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent desktops in a pooled host pool
Explanation:
When providing temporary access to contractors, security and session management are key considerations. Personal host pools (B) allocate dedicated desktops with persistent profiles, which is unnecessary for temporary users and increases management overhead. NV-series virtual machines (C) provide GPU acceleration but full desktop access and persistent profiles are unnecessary for contractors who only need specific applications. Azure Key Vault (D) secures secrets and certificates but does not control access to desktops or applications.
RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent desktops in a pooled host pool (A) addresses these requirements effectively. RemoteApp streaming delivers only the selected applications to the user, preventing access to the full desktop environment. Non-persistent desktops ensure that all session changes, temporary files, and user-specific settings are discarded at logoff, maintaining a clean environment for each new session.
Pooled host pools allow multiple users to share session hosts efficiently. Administrators can deploy image-based session hosts configured with the necessary applications, enabling rapid scaling for a fluctuating contractor workforce. FSLogix profile containers are not required in this scenario since session persistence is not desired.
Conditional Access policies can be enforced to control who can access the applications, restrict connections to compliant devices, and require multi-factor authentication. Azure Monitor can be used to track session activity, detect potential misuse, and generate reports for compliance purposes.
This configuration aligns with Microsoft best practices for secure, temporary access in AVD, ensuring that contractors can access the applications they need without leaving residual data or impacting corporate resources. It minimizes administrative effort while maintaining security, scalability, and cost efficiency.
Question 48:
An organization wants to deploy Azure Virtual Desktop for its sales team. The sales team travels frequently and needs fast access to their virtual desktops with low latency. The administrator wants to deploy session hosts in the region closest to users while minimizing management overhead. Which deployment strategy should the administrator implement?
A) Multi-region pooled host pools with image-based deployment and autoscaling
B) Personal host pool in a single region with manual session host provisioning
C) RemoteApp streaming in a single region with persistent profiles
D) NV-series virtual machines deployed on-premises
Answer:
A) Multi-region pooled host pools with image-based deployment and autoscaling
Explanation:
Ensuring low-latency access for a traveling sales team requires careful planning of session host deployment. Personal host pools in a single region (B) may result in high latency for users far from the region, reducing productivity. RemoteApp streaming in a single region (C) delivers applications but may also suffer latency issues for users in distant locations. NV-series virtual machines deployed on-premises (D) require significant infrastructure management and do not address geographic distribution efficiently.
Multi-region pooled host pools with image-based deployment and autoscaling (A) provide the optimal solution. Deploying session hosts in multiple Azure regions ensures that users connect to the nearest available host, reducing network latency and improving responsiveness. Pooled host pools allow multiple users to share session hosts, optimizing resource usage and reducing operational overhead.
Image-based deployment ensures consistency across regions by creating session hosts from a standardized image that includes the operating system, applications, and configurations. This minimizes configuration errors and simplifies maintenance. Autoscaling policies automatically adjust the number of session hosts based on active user demand, ensuring sufficient capacity during peak usage and reducing costs during off-peak periods.
FSLogix profile containers can be used to maintain consistent user profiles across regions, allowing users to access their settings and applications seamlessly regardless of which regional host they connect to. Conditional Access policies and Azure Monitor can be integrated to enforce security requirements, track session performance, and monitor resource utilization across all regions.
This deployment strategy aligns with Microsoft best practices for enterprise AVD deployments, providing high performance, low-latency access, simplified management, and scalability. It ensures that the sales team can remain productive while traveling without compromising security or operational efficiency.
Question 49:
A company is planning to deploy Azure Virtual Desktop for its legal department. The department requires strict compliance with data retention and access policies. Administrators want to ensure that all user sessions are auditable and that sensitive data cannot be copied to unmanaged devices. Which solution should the administrator implement?
A) Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access policies, FSLogix profile containers, and Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention
B) Personal host pools with local profiles and direct RDP access
C) RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent desktops without monitoring
D) NV-series virtual machines for GPU-intensive applications
Answer:
A) Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access policies, FSLogix profile containers, and Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention
Explanation:
The legal department requires a high level of compliance and auditability due to the sensitive nature of legal data. Using personal host pools with local profiles (B) provides dedicated desktops but lacks centralized control over session monitoring, data loss prevention, and audit logging. Direct RDP access increases security risk because users may connect from unmanaged or non-compliant devices, exposing sensitive legal documents. RemoteApp streaming with non-persistent desktops without monitoring (C) delivers applications but does not provide sufficient auditing, control over data export, or persistent storage needed for compliance requirements. NV-series virtual machines (D) are optimized for GPU workloads and do not address compliance or data loss prevention requirements.
Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access policies, FSLogix profile containers, and Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (A) provides a comprehensive solution to meet these strict compliance requirements. Conditional Access policies enforce that only users from compliant and managed devices can access AVD resources, and they can require multi-factor authentication for all sessions. This ensures that unauthorized or unmanaged devices cannot access sensitive legal information. Administrators can configure location-based policies to prevent connections from high-risk regions, further securing access.
FSLogix profile containers centralize user profile management and provide persistent storage in Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files. This ensures that user data is stored securely in the cloud, enabling consistent access to documents, applications, and settings while preventing local caching that could lead to data leakage. Profile containers also allow administrators to apply backup, monitoring, and retention policies, which are critical for compliance in the legal environment.
Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) integrates with AVD to monitor and control data movement during user sessions. DLP policies can block copy-paste, download, or file transfer operations from AVD sessions to unmanaged devices. Alerts and audit logs provide visibility into attempted data exfiltration, which is essential for meeting regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, or industry-specific legal standards. Combined with FSLogix containers and Conditional Access, DLP policies ensure that sensitive legal data remains secure while providing the legal team with a seamless virtual desktop experience.
Administrators can leverage Azure Monitor and Azure Log Analytics to track user activity, monitor session performance, and generate detailed audit reports for compliance audits. Logging every user login, application launch, file access, and attempted policy violation enables comprehensive auditing. Integration with Azure Security Center and Microsoft Sentinel can provide advanced threat detection, anomaly detection, and automated alerts for potential breaches or non-compliant activity.
The AVD solution provides scalability, cost efficiency, and secure access. Multi-session Windows 10 or Windows 11 Enterprise images can be deployed to optimize resource utilization, allowing multiple legal users to share session hosts while maintaining isolation and performance. Autoscaling ensures that session hosts are provisioned dynamically based on user demand, reducing operational costs while maintaining availability during peak work periods.
By implementing Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access, FSLogix profile containers, and Endpoint DLP, organizations can enforce strict compliance policies, secure sensitive legal data, provide persistent user experiences, and ensure auditability across the department. This configuration aligns with Microsoft best practices for AVD deployments in regulated environments, balancing security, user productivity, and operational efficiency.
Question 50:
A company wants to provide its human resources team with access to Azure Virtual Desktop. The HR team frequently travels and works from multiple locations. The administrator wants users to have seamless access to their personal desktop, with all settings, applications, and data available regardless of the connection location. Which deployment should the administrator implement?
A) Personal host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session and FSLogix profile containers
B) Pooled host pool with non-persistent desktops
C) RemoteApp streaming for selected HR applications only
D) B-series virtual machines with temporary profiles
Answer:
A) Personal host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session and FSLogix profile containers
Explanation:
Human resources teams require persistent and personalized desktops that maintain user-specific configurations, installed applications, and data across sessions. Pooled host pools with non-persistent desktops (B) do not retain user settings or data between sessions, making them unsuitable for HR personnel who need continuity in their work environment. RemoteApp streaming (C) delivers only selected applications and does not provide a full desktop experience, limiting the user’s ability to access all HR tools and data in a unified interface. B-series virtual machines (D) with temporary profiles offer limited compute power and do not maintain persistent data, which is essential for HR workflows.
A personal host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session and FSLogix profile containers (A) ensures that each HR user has a dedicated virtual desktop that retains all personal settings, installed applications, and work data. Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session allows for efficient resource utilization by hosting multiple users on the same session host while providing each user with a persistent and isolated experience. FSLogix profile containers redirect user profiles to a centralized storage location, such as Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files, enabling fast logon times and consistent desktop experiences regardless of which session host the user connects to.
The solution allows HR staff to connect from any location or device while ensuring their desktop remains consistent. Administrators can implement Azure AD Conditional Access policies to enforce security requirements for mobile and remote connections, including device compliance, multi-factor authentication, and location restrictions. FSLogix ensures that user data is preserved even if session hosts are scaled down or replaced, which is critical for remote work scenarios where sessions may terminate unexpectedly.
Administrators can use Azure Monitor and Azure Automation to track session performance, monitor logon times, and optimize session host capacity through autoscaling. This provides a seamless user experience while reducing operational costs. Additionally, FSLogix profile containers enable granular policy control, backup, and recovery, ensuring that HR data remains secure, available, and compliant with organizational policies.
This deployment approach aligns with Microsoft best practices for delivering persistent and personalized virtual desktops. It addresses the HR team’s requirements for mobility, access to a full desktop environment, and consistent user experience while maintaining security, auditability, and operational efficiency. By combining personal host pools, Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, and FSLogix profile containers, organizations can ensure that HR staff can work productively from any location without interruptions or data loss.
Question 51:
An organization wants to optimize cost and performance for Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts that support the research team. The team uses applications that are CPU-intensive but do not require GPU acceleration. The administrator wants the session hosts to scale dynamically based on usage to minimize costs. Which strategy should the administrator implement?
A) Pooled host pools with D-series virtual machines, autoscaling, and FSLogix profile containers
B) Personal host pools with B-series virtual machines and persistent profiles
C) NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
D) RemoteApp streaming with full GPU acceleration
Answer:
A) Pooled host pools with D-series virtual machines, autoscaling, and FSLogix profile containers
Explanation:
Research teams using CPU-intensive applications require high-performance virtual machines optimized for compute tasks. Personal host pools with B-series virtual machines and persistent profiles (B) provide limited CPU resources and are more suitable for lightweight or occasional workloads. NV-series virtual machines (C) are designed for GPU workloads and do not offer cost-effective compute optimization for CPU-intensive applications. RemoteApp streaming with full GPU acceleration (D) is unnecessary when applications are CPU-intensive and would result in higher costs without added performance benefit.
Pooled host pools with D-series virtual machines, autoscaling, and FSLogix profile containers (A) provide an optimal solution. D-series virtual machines offer balanced CPU and memory resources ideal for research applications that perform intensive computations. Pooled host pools allow multiple users to share session hosts, reducing the total number of virtual machines required and optimizing resource usage. Autoscaling dynamically adjusts the number of active session hosts based on user demand, scaling down during periods of low usage to reduce costs and scaling up during peak research activity to ensure performance.
FSLogix profile containers centralize user profiles and ensure persistent user data and settings across sessions. This enables researchers to maintain application configurations, data, and custom settings without manual migration or repeated setup. Using Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files to store profile containers ensures high availability and fast access to user data, even when session hosts are scaled up or down automatically.
Administrators can implement Azure Monitor to track session host health, CPU utilization, memory consumption, and user logon performance. This allows proactive adjustments, automated scaling rules, and timely resolution of potential bottlenecks. Conditional Access policies can be used to enforce security measures such as multi-factor authentication, location-based access, and compliance requirements for remote researchers.
By deploying D-series virtual machines in pooled host pools with autoscaling and FSLogix profile containers, organizations can balance cost efficiency, performance, and user experience. This strategy ensures that research teams have the computing power they need while optimizing resource utilization, minimizing operational overhead, and maintaining consistent and persistent desktop experiences across sessions.
Question 52:
A company plans to provide its customer support team with Azure Virtual Desktop access. The team works on shared documents and uses applications that require persistent settings, but not GPU acceleration. Administrators want to optimize costs while providing a responsive user experience. Which deployment configuration should the administrator choose?
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, D-series virtual machines, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
B) Personal host pool with B-series virtual machines and temporary profiles
C) NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
D) RemoteApp streaming for specific applications only
Answer:
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, D-series virtual machines, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
Explanation:
Customer support teams typically work with standard business applications, shared documents, and customer service software. These applications do not require GPU acceleration, making NV-series virtual machines (C) unnecessary and cost-inefficient. Personal host pools with B-series virtual machines and temporary profiles (B) provide limited CPU and memory resources and would not deliver a consistent user experience for multiple users performing intensive tasks during high-volume support periods. RemoteApp streaming (D) delivers only individual applications without full desktop access and would not support persistent settings or seamless access to shared resources.
Pooled host pools with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, D-series virtual machines, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling (A) provide the optimal balance of performance, cost efficiency, and persistence for customer support teams. Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session allows multiple users to share a single session host while maintaining isolated environments. This reduces infrastructure costs by maximizing utilization of each session host. D-series virtual machines offer an appropriate CPU and memory ratio to handle multiple simultaneous user sessions with applications commonly used in support workflows, such as CRM tools, productivity software, and communication platforms.
FSLogix profile containers centralize user profiles and enable persistent desktop experiences. Every user retains their desktop settings, installed applications, and custom configurations across sessions. Profile containers ensure that settings are stored securely in Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files, providing high availability, rapid access, and consistent user experience regardless of which session host a user connects to. Profile containers also support backup and recovery procedures, which is essential for maintaining business continuity in a customer support environment.
Autoscaling dynamically adjusts the number of session hosts based on active user load. During peak support hours, additional session hosts can be provisioned automatically to ensure a responsive and uninterrupted user experience. When demand decreases, session hosts are scaled down to reduce costs. Administrators can define autoscaling rules based on metrics such as CPU utilization, active session count, or time-of-day scheduling. This approach ensures that the organization only pays for the resources needed at any given time, avoiding over-provisioning while maintaining performance.
Azure Monitor and Azure Log Analytics can provide comprehensive tracking of session performance, resource utilization, logon times, and user activity. Administrators can generate reports to identify performance bottlenecks, optimize autoscaling rules, and proactively address potential issues before they affect the support team. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel allows for threat detection, audit logs, and alerting, enhancing security for customer data and sensitive information accessed through Azure Virtual Desktop.
This configuration aligns with Microsoft best practices for AVD deployments in multi-user environments where cost efficiency, persistent settings, and responsive performance are critical. By combining Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, D-series virtual machines, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling, organizations ensure a seamless, secure, and highly available virtual desktop environment for their customer support teams, optimizing both user productivity and operational efficiency.
Question 53:
An organization wants to enable secure remote access to Azure Virtual Desktop for its finance department. Employees often work from unmanaged devices, including personal laptops. The administrator wants to ensure that only compliant devices can connect, sensitive data is protected, and sessions are monitored for compliance. Which configuration should the administrator implement?
A) Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access policies, FSLogix profile containers, and Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention
B) Personal host pools with temporary profiles and open RDP access
C) RemoteApp streaming without monitoring or compliance policies
D) B-series virtual machines with local profiles
Answer:
A) Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access policies, FSLogix profile containers, and Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention
Explanation:
Finance departments handle highly sensitive information, including payroll data, financial reports, and regulatory filings. Allowing access from unmanaged devices without enforcing security policies (B and C) exposes this data to unauthorized access, potential leaks, and compliance violations. Using B-series virtual machines with local profiles (D) provides limited resources and does not address the requirements for data loss prevention, session monitoring, or conditional access for unmanaged devices.
Implementing Azure Virtual Desktop with Conditional Access policies, FSLogix profile containers, and Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (A) ensures secure, compliant access for finance users. Conditional Access policies allow administrators to define granular access rules, ensuring that only devices that meet compliance standards can connect. Policies can enforce device compliance checks, require multi-factor authentication, and restrict access based on user location or network risk. This mitigates the risk associated with remote work on unmanaged or personal devices.
FSLogix profile containers provide persistent user profiles stored in secure, centralized cloud storage. Users can access their personalized desktops and application settings consistently across sessions while administrators retain control over backup, monitoring, and retention policies. Centralized profiles simplify management for administrators and enable rapid recovery in case of session host failures. Profile containers also prevent local storage of sensitive data on unmanaged devices, reducing the risk of data exfiltration.
Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides real-time monitoring and control of sensitive data accessed through Azure Virtual Desktop. DLP policies prevent unauthorized copy-paste, downloads, or transfer of files to non-compliant devices. Alerts and audit logs track attempted violations, enabling compliance reporting and immediate remediation. Integration with Azure Security Center and Microsoft Sentinel enhances monitoring capabilities, allowing administrators to detect unusual activity, potential insider threats, or policy violations, providing a comprehensive security and compliance framework.
Administrators can also leverage Azure Monitor and Log Analytics to track session health, performance metrics, logon times, and user activity. Combining monitoring, Conditional Access, FSLogix, and DLP policies ensures that finance department desktops remain secure, data is protected, and regulatory requirements are met. This approach aligns with Microsoft recommendations for deploying AVD in high-security environments, balancing user productivity with stringent compliance needs.
By applying this configuration, organizations ensure that finance users can securely access their desktops from anywhere while maintaining persistent settings, protecting sensitive data, and enforcing strict compliance and auditing standards. This mitigates risks associated with remote access and unmanaged devices, ensuring secure and seamless user experiences without compromising data security.
Question 54:
A development team requires access to Azure Virtual Desktop to use multiple development tools and custom scripts. The team needs persistent desktops with the ability to install applications without impacting other users. Administrators also want to optimize costs by sharing session hosts while ensuring adequate performance. Which solution should the administrator deploy?
A) Personal host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and D-series virtual machines
B) Pooled host pool with non-persistent desktops and temporary profiles
C) RemoteApp streaming for selected development tools only
D) NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
Answer:
A) Personal host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and D-series virtual machines
Explanation:
Development teams often require a flexible environment where they can install custom software, use scripts, and maintain persistent desktops. Pooled host pools with non-persistent desktops and temporary profiles (B) do not provide persistence, causing any custom tools or settings to be lost at logoff. RemoteApp streaming (C) provides access to selected applications only, limiting the developers’ ability to use multiple tools, scripts, or a full development environment. NV-series virtual machines (D) are designed for GPU-intensive workloads and are cost-prohibitive for standard development scenarios that do not require GPU acceleration.
A personal host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and D-series virtual machines (A) addresses all requirements. Each developer receives a dedicated persistent desktop while multiple users can share session hosts, optimizing resource utilization. D-series virtual machines offer a balanced CPU and memory configuration suitable for development workloads, ensuring responsive performance for running multiple development tools simultaneously.
FSLogix profile containers enable persistence of user profiles, installed applications, and custom settings, ensuring that developers retain their configurations across sessions. This also supports centralized management of user data, backups, and policy enforcement. By hosting multiple users on the same session host, organizations reduce the number of required virtual machines, optimizing costs without compromising user experience.
Administrators can implement autoscaling to dynamically add or remove session hosts based on active user load, further enhancing cost efficiency. Azure Monitor and Log Analytics provide insights into session host utilization, performance metrics, and potential resource bottlenecks, allowing administrators to adjust host sizing and scaling rules as needed. Conditional Access policies can enforce secure access while ensuring that developers can connect from authorized devices only.
This deployment ensures that development teams can work productively with persistent, isolated desktops, install applications freely, and share session hosts efficiently. By combining personal host pools, Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and D-series virtual machines, organizations provide a secure, scalable, cost-effective, and high-performance environment that aligns with the Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop best practices and meets the specific needs of development teams.
Question 55:
An organization wants to provide contractors with temporary access to Azure Virtual Desktop for a six-week project. Contractors should not have persistent desktops, and their sessions should be automatically removed when they finish the project. Which deployment model should the administrator implement?
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, temporary profiles, and autoscaling
B) Personal host pool with D-series virtual machines and FSLogix profile containers
C) NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
D) RemoteApp streaming for project-specific applications only
Answer:
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, temporary profiles, and autoscaling
Explanation:
When providing temporary access to contractors, organizations need to ensure that desktops are non-persistent to avoid leftover data, reduce management overhead, and enforce automatic session cleanup after the project concludes. Personal host pools with dedicated desktops (B) or NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops (C) are not optimal because personal host pools increase cost and require dedicated resources, while NV-series VMs are designed for GPU workloads, which are not needed in typical contractor scenarios. RemoteApp streaming (D) limits access to specific applications without providing a full desktop environment, which may not meet the project’s operational requirements if contractors need complete desktop functionality.
A pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, temporary profiles, and autoscaling (A) meets all the requirements for temporary contractor access. In a pooled host pool, multiple users share the same session host, optimizing resource utilization and reducing costs, since the organization does not need to provision a separate virtual machine for each contractor. Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session allows multiple concurrent users to access a single virtual machine while maintaining isolated sessions, ensuring that each contractor’s session does not interfere with others.
Temporary profiles ensure that any user-specific configurations, files, or installed applications are discarded after logoff, meeting the requirement that sessions are automatically removed after the project ends. This reduces administrative tasks associated with manually deleting contractor accounts or cleaning up user data from the session host.
Autoscaling further optimizes cost efficiency by automatically adjusting the number of session hosts based on active users. During peak usage, additional session hosts are provisioned to maintain performance. When usage decreases, resources are scaled down to minimize costs. Administrators can define scaling rules based on CPU utilization, number of active sessions, or time-of-day schedules, which aligns perfectly with temporary workforce requirements where usage patterns can vary significantly.
Integrating FSLogix profile containers is unnecessary in this scenario because persistence is not required. Security can be enforced with Conditional Access policies to ensure that only authorized contractors connect from compliant devices. Additionally, monitoring session activity with Azure Monitor and Azure Log Analytics provides insight into contractor usage, performance metrics, and potential security issues, allowing administrators to respond quickly if any policy violations occur.
This configuration balances cost efficiency, resource utilization, and security, providing temporary access without persistent data, while ensuring contractors have a responsive virtual desktop environment to complete their work. By using Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, temporary profiles, and autoscaling in a pooled host pool, organizations meet all operational, security, and administrative requirements for a temporary workforce.
Question 56:
A company wants to implement Azure Virtual Desktop for its design team. Designers need GPU acceleration for 3D modeling applications, persistent desktops, and high availability. Administrators also need to manage cost while supporting multiple users. Which deployment configuration should the administrator select?
A) NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
B) D-series virtual machines with pooled host pools and temporary profiles
C) RemoteApp streaming for design applications only
D) B-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
Answer:
A) NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
Explanation:
Design teams often require GPU acceleration for 3D modeling, CAD software, rendering applications, and other graphics-intensive workloads. D-series or B-series virtual machines (B and D) do not provide GPU resources and would result in poor performance for 3D modeling, design, and rendering tasks. RemoteApp streaming (C) provides access to individual applications but does not provide full desktops, limiting designers’ ability to manage multiple files and applications simultaneously.
NV-series virtual machines are purpose-built to provide GPU acceleration using NVIDIA Tesla graphics cards, ensuring that design applications perform optimally. When combined with personal host pools, each designer receives a dedicated persistent desktop, allowing them to install applications, maintain project files, and retain settings between sessions. This is crucial for designers who need to work on long-term projects or maintain complex custom configurations.
FSLogix profile containers centralize user profiles and provide persistence across sessions, ensuring that designers’ personalized settings, tools, and configurations are maintained. Centralized profiles also support data backup, auditing, and recovery, which is critical when dealing with large design files and sensitive project data. Administrators can store profile containers in Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files for high availability and performance.
Autoscaling further helps manage cost by automatically adding or removing session hosts based on active users and workload requirements. NV-series virtual machines are more expensive than standard D-series VMs, so autoscaling ensures that resources are provisioned only when needed. Administrators can define rules based on CPU, GPU utilization, or session counts, enabling cost-effective scaling while maintaining high performance.
Network and storage considerations are also important. Designers often work with large files, requiring fast network connectivity and storage performance. Azure Premium Storage and high-throughput networking are recommended to minimize latency and support smooth access to large project files. Azure Monitor and Log Analytics can provide insights into session performance, GPU utilization, and storage access patterns, helping administrators optimize the virtual desktop environment for performance and reliability.
By deploying NV-series VMs in personal host pools with FSLogix profile containers and autoscaling, organizations deliver a high-performance, persistent, and highly available Azure Virtual Desktop solution tailored to designers’ needs while effectively managing costs and operational overhead. This approach ensures that users experience smooth 3D modeling, rendering, and graphics-intensive workflows, while administrators maintain centralized control, compliance, and resource efficiency.
Question 57:
An IT administrator is tasked with providing Azure Virtual Desktop access to the marketing department. The team uses standard business applications, requires persistent desktops, and occasionally works remotely. Administrators want to minimize costs while maintaining user experience and ensuring profile persistence. Which deployment model should be used?
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
B) Personal host pool with B-series virtual machines and temporary profiles
C) RemoteApp streaming for specific marketing applications
D) NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
Answer:
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
Explanation:
Marketing teams commonly use standard business productivity applications such as Office 365, collaboration tools, CRM systems, and marketing analytics software. These workloads do not require GPU acceleration, making NV-series virtual machines (D) unnecessary and cost-inefficient. Personal host pools with temporary profiles (B) provide dedicated desktops but do not allow persistent storage of user profiles, meaning marketing users would lose custom settings, shortcuts, and desktop configurations upon logoff. RemoteApp streaming (C) restricts users to individual applications, which may not meet the team’s need for full desktop access and seamless workflow across multiple applications.
A pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling (A) provides the optimal balance of performance, cost efficiency, and persistence. Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session allows multiple users to share a session host while maintaining isolated environments. This reduces infrastructure costs by maximizing utilization of each session host, making it ideal for departments with moderate workloads that do not require dedicated desktops for each user.
FSLogix profile containers ensure that each user’s desktop settings, files, and application configurations are stored centrally and persist across sessions. This is crucial for marketing teams that need access to customized dashboards, templates, and personal productivity settings across different sessions and devices. Centralized profiles also facilitate secure backups, easy recovery, and simplified management for IT administrators.
Autoscaling dynamically adjusts the number of session hosts based on user demand. During peak work hours, additional hosts are provisioned to ensure performance remains consistent. When demand decreases, session hosts are scaled down to reduce operational costs. Administrators can configure autoscaling rules based on CPU usage, active session count, or scheduled work hours, aligning with typical marketing department workflows that may have predictable peaks and troughs.
Security and compliance can be enforced through Conditional Access policies, ensuring that only authorized users can access the virtual desktop environment from compliant devices. Integration with Microsoft Endpoint DLP and monitoring tools such as Azure Monitor and Log Analytics ensures that sensitive marketing data is protected and that administrators have insight into session activity, resource utilization, and potential performance bottlenecks.
This deployment model ensures that marketing users have persistent desktops, can work remotely efficiently, and maintain a seamless workflow while administrators benefit from centralized management, cost efficiency, and the ability to scale resources dynamically based on demand. Combining Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling meets the operational, security, and financial requirements of a marketing department using Azure Virtual Desktop.
Question 58:
A company wants to deploy Azure Virtual Desktop for its customer support team. The team needs access to standard applications, web browsers, and internal CRM tools. Users work from various locations, including home and branch offices. The administrator wants to minimize costs while maintaining performance and ensuring profile persistence. Which deployment model should the administrator implement?
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
B) Personal host pool with D-series virtual machines and temporary profiles
C) RemoteApp streaming for CRM applications only
D) NV-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
Answer:
A) Pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
Explanation:
For customer support teams that primarily use standard productivity applications, web browsers, and internal CRM tools, selecting the right Azure Virtual Desktop configuration is critical to balance cost, performance, and user experience. Personal host pools (B) provide dedicated desktops but are inefficient for multiple users with similar workloads, as each virtual machine is reserved for a single user, increasing cost unnecessarily. NV-series virtual machines (D) are designed for GPU-intensive workloads such as 3D modeling and rendering, which are unnecessary for customer support tasks. RemoteApp streaming (C) restricts users to individual applications rather than providing full desktops, which limits workflow flexibility if the team requires multiple applications concurrently.
A pooled host pool with Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling (A) is the ideal deployment model. A pooled host pool allows multiple users to share session hosts efficiently. This is cost-effective because fewer virtual machines are required to serve the same number of users, and each VM can host multiple sessions simultaneously without performance degradation when configured correctly. Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session ensures that users have isolated environments on shared VMs, maintaining data privacy and providing a consistent experience.
FSLogix profile containers provide persistent profiles, ensuring that user settings, application configurations, and personal data persist across sessions and devices. This is particularly important for a distributed workforce that accesses desktops from multiple locations, such as home and branch offices. FSLogix stores profiles centrally in Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files, providing high availability, fast access, and simplified backup and recovery processes.
Autoscaling enhances cost optimization by adjusting the number of session hosts dynamically based on user demand. During peak hours, additional VMs can be provisioned to maintain performance, while off-peak periods trigger deallocation of unused VMs to minimize cost. Administrators can configure autoscaling rules based on CPU usage, active session counts, or schedules, providing fine-grained control over resources.
Network optimization is another critical consideration. Since customer support teams work remotely, configuring Azure Virtual Desktop with proper networking and bandwidth optimization ensures smooth connectivity and minimal latency. VPNs, Azure ExpressRoute, or optimized routing via Azure Virtual WAN can improve user experience. Additionally, Conditional Access policies enforce security requirements, ensuring that only authorized devices and users can access desktops, protecting sensitive customer data.
Monitoring and analytics also play a vital role in this deployment. Azure Monitor and Log Analytics provide insights into session performance, VM health, application usage, and profile container access patterns. Administrators can proactively identify potential bottlenecks or user experience issues and take corrective action, such as adjusting session host capacity, applying updates, or optimizing application deployment.
Implementing a pooled host pool with multi-session Windows 10 Enterprise, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling provides a scalable, cost-effective, and user-friendly solution for the customer support team. It ensures persistent profiles, optimal performance, and centralized management while enabling secure and flexible remote access. This deployment aligns with Azure Virtual Desktop best practices for shared, knowledge-worker workloads.
Question 59:
A company’s finance team requires Azure Virtual Desktop for accessing financial applications, reports, and spreadsheets. Users must have persistent desktops with high performance. The administrator wants to provide GPU acceleration for financial modeling and visualizations while ensuring cost efficiency. Which deployment configuration is appropriate?
A) NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
B) D-series virtual machines with pooled host pools and temporary profiles
C) RemoteApp streaming for financial applications only
D) B-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
Answer:
A) NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
Explanation:
Finance teams often rely on advanced Excel models, Power BI dashboards, and data visualization tools, some of which can benefit from GPU acceleration for rendering complex graphs or performing large-scale computations. Selecting the correct Azure Virtual Desktop configuration ensures high performance while maintaining persistent desktops and cost control. D-series or B-series virtual machines (B and D) do not provide GPU resources, making them unsuitable for financial modeling or graphically intensive tasks. RemoteApp streaming (C) is insufficient because the finance team needs a full desktop to manage multiple applications and large datasets concurrently.
NV-series virtual machines are designed for GPU-intensive workloads and are the optimal choice for financial teams requiring enhanced visualization capabilities. By using personal host pools, each finance team member receives a dedicated persistent desktop, allowing them to maintain installed applications, custom settings, and personal files between sessions. This persistence is critical for workflows where users rely on consistent configurations, macros, and templates for daily operations.
FSLogix profile containers centralize user profiles, ensuring persistent settings and data across sessions, while providing simplified management for administrators. Profiles are stored in Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files with high availability, allowing users to access their desktops and profiles from different locations without losing any configurations. This centralization also facilitates backup, disaster recovery, and auditing, which is especially important in regulated financial environments.
Autoscaling is implemented to optimize resource usage and manage costs effectively. During peak work hours, additional NV-series session hosts can be provisioned to maintain performance. When workload demand decreases, session hosts are scaled down to reduce operational expenses. Administrators can define autoscaling rules based on GPU and CPU utilization or scheduled working hours, ensuring that the finance team experiences optimal performance without unnecessary costs.
Security is a paramount consideration for financial data. Azure Conditional Access policies and Multi-Factor Authentication enforce secure access, while integration with Microsoft Endpoint Manager ensures device compliance. Monitoring through Azure Monitor and Log Analytics provides insight into VM performance, session activity, and GPU utilization, enabling proactive management and troubleshooting.
Using NV-series VMs with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling provides a high-performance, persistent, and secure Azure Virtual Desktop deployment for finance teams. Users benefit from GPU acceleration, consistent desktops, and centralized profile management while administrators maintain cost efficiency, operational control, and compliance. This configuration meets the demanding requirements of finance teams, balancing performance, persistence, security, and cost-effectiveness.
Question 60:
A software development team requires Azure Virtual Desktop to run development tools, code editors, and testing environments. Developers need persistent desktops, access to GPU resources for compiling and testing, and scalable resources for peak development cycles. Which configuration should the administrator choose?
A) NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
B) D-series virtual machines with pooled host pools and temporary profiles
C) RemoteApp streaming for development tools only
D) B-series virtual machines with non-persistent desktops
Answer:
A) NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling
Explanation:
Software development workloads frequently involve running integrated development environments (IDEs), code compilation, testing frameworks, and debugging tools. Certain tasks, such as compiling large projects, running simulations, or performing GPU-accelerated tests, benefit significantly from GPU resources, making NV-series virtual machines the best choice for this team. D-series or B-series VMs (B and D) do not provide GPU capabilities, making them unsuitable for development workloads that require graphics or computation acceleration. RemoteApp streaming (C) restricts developers to individual applications and does not provide the flexibility of a full desktop, which developers need for multitasking across IDEs, version control, and build tools.
Using personal host pools ensures that each developer has a dedicated persistent desktop. This is critical for maintaining development environment configurations, installed SDKs, project files, version control settings, and debugging configurations between sessions. Without persistent desktops, developers would spend significant time reconfiguring their environment with each logon, reducing productivity and increasing operational frustration.
FSLogix profile containers centralize user profiles, ensuring that developers’ configurations, custom extensions, and personalized settings are preserved across sessions. This also simplifies backup, recovery, and migration processes while enabling seamless access from different devices. Profiles can be stored in high-performance Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files to provide low-latency access and high availability.
Autoscaling allows administrators to optimize costs by scaling the number of session hosts dynamically based on active user load or scheduled peak development cycles. During periods of intensive development or testing, additional NV-series VMs can be provisioned to ensure performance. When workloads decrease, unused session hosts are deallocated, reducing operational cost. Administrators can define autoscaling rules based on CPU and GPU utilization thresholds, number of active sessions, or scheduled development cycles.
Security and compliance measures are essential for protecting intellectual property and sensitive code repositories. Conditional Access, Multi-Factor Authentication, and integration with Microsoft Endpoint Manager ensure that only authorized developers access the environment from secure devices. Monitoring through Azure Monitor and Log Analytics allows administrators to track session activity, GPU utilization, storage performance, and VM health, enabling proactive troubleshooting and optimization.
Deploying NV-series virtual machines with personal host pools, FSLogix profile containers, and autoscaling ensures developers have persistent, high-performance desktops capable of supporting GPU-intensive workloads, maintaining development configurations, and scaling dynamically according to workload demand. This configuration provides the balance between developer productivity, resource efficiency, and cost management, aligning with Azure Virtual Desktop best practices for graphics-intensive and persistent workloads.