Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-100 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 166
Your organization wants to implement a secure authentication mechanism that supports passwordless sign-ins across Azure AD and Microsoft 365. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Authenticator Passwordless
B) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
C) Microsoft Defender for Identity
D) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Answer: A) Microsoft Authenticator Passwordless
Explanation:
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is designed to manage just-in-time administrative access, enforcing time-bound role assignments, approvals, and audit logging. While it strengthens security for privileged accounts, it does not provide a passwordless authentication mechanism for all users or for general cloud sign-ins. Its primary function is privilege management rather than everyday authentication.
Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors Active Directory for identity threats such as lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket attacks, and abnormal authentication behavior. It does not enable passwordless sign-ins or change authentication methods for users. Its scope is monitoring and threat detection within hybrid or on-premises AD environments.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on classifying, monitoring, and protecting sensitive data across Microsoft 365 services. It cannot modify authentication flows or provide passwordless login experiences. Its function is related to data governance and compliance, not identity authentication.
Microsoft Authenticator Passwordless enables users to sign in to Azure AD and Microsoft 365 without using passwords. Instead, it leverages device-based authentication, biometrics (such as fingerprint or facial recognition), and push notifications to the Microsoft Authenticator app. This approach enhances security by removing passwords from the authentication flow, which mitigates risks like phishing, credential reuse, and brute-force attacks. Users approve sign-ins directly from their trusted device, which reduces friction and improves user experience. It integrates with Conditional Access policies, allowing administrators to enforce risk-based, passwordless authentication for users across the organization. By implementing Microsoft Authenticator Passwordless, organizations can improve overall security posture while enhancing usability, making it the optimal solution for secure, modern authentication.
Question 167
Your organization wants to monitor and protect privileged accounts across hybrid environments, including on-premises Active Directory and Azure AD. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
B) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
C) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors on-premises Active Directory for suspicious activities such as lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket attacks, Golden Ticket attacks, and domain dominance. While it detects compromised accounts and threats, it does not enforce just-in-time access or manage administrative privileges directly. Its focus is detection and alerting for identity threats rather than controlling privileged access.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management detects behavioral anomalies indicative of insider threats, such as unusual downloads or access patterns, across Microsoft 365. While it helps prevent misuse of privileges, it does not provide administrative role management or enforce time-limited access to privileged accounts. Its scope is risk analysis and behavioral monitoring.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint secures endpoints by detecting malware, exploits, and advanced threats. While endpoints may be indirectly related to administrative activity, Defender for Endpoint does not control privileged account access or manage role assignments.
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) allows administrators to enforce just-in-time access to privileged roles in Azure AD and Microsoft 365. It reduces the risk associated with standing administrative privileges by requiring approval workflows, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and time-limited role activation. PIM provides audit logs, alerts, and historical reports on role assignments, ensuring accountability and compliance. By combining time-bound access with monitoring and reporting, PIM strengthens hybrid identity security and aligns with least privilege principles. Its ability to manage privileged accounts across cloud and hybrid environments makes it the correct solution for this scenario.
Question 168
Your organization wants to continuously assess and improve the security posture of Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud resources while prioritizing high-risk misconfigurations. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Azure Policy
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Azure Security Center
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Explanation:
Azure Policy enforces compliance by evaluating and remediating resources against configuration rules within Azure. While it can prevent misconfigurations in Azure, it does not extend to AWS or Google Cloud, and it lacks continuous risk prioritization and threat detection across multiple clouds.
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM solution that collects and analyzes security events, providing detection and response capabilities. Although Sentinel is useful for log correlation and threat investigation, it does not provide continuous posture assessment or prioritized recommendations for cloud resources.
Azure Security Center has been integrated into Microsoft Defender for Cloud and primarily provides posture management and threat protection within Azure. On its own, it does not provide comprehensive multicloud monitoring or detailed prioritization of risks.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides continuous Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. It identifies misconfigurations, assesses compliance against industry frameworks (e.g., CIS, NIST), and assigns prioritized recommendations based on risk severity. It integrates with native cloud APIs for accurate assessment, while also providing Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) capabilities to detect threats on workloads. Secure Score reporting allows administrators to track improvements, prioritize remediation actions, and ensure consistent security across multicloud environments. By combining multicloud visibility, threat detection, and prioritized recommendations, Defender for Cloud is the optimal solution for organizations aiming to maintain a strong cloud security posture.
Question 169
Your organization wants to detect and respond to insider threats based on anomalous activities such as unusual downloads, excessive access, or data exfiltration. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint detects malware, ransomware, and exploits on devices but does not analyze user behavior for insider threat patterns. While it ensures endpoint protection, it does not monitor document access, downloads, or data exfiltration indicators.
Azure AD Identity Protection evaluates risky sign-ins and compromised credentials but does not analyze post-authentication activity or user behavior indicative of insider threats. Its scope is limited to identity and authentication risk, not ongoing behavior monitoring.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection classifies and protects sensitive data, applying labels, encryption, and DLP policies. While it helps prevent accidental or intentional data leakage, it does not provide behavioral analytics or risk scoring for insider threat detection.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management monitors user activities across Microsoft 365, including SharePoint, Teams, Exchange, and OneDrive. It identifies abnormal patterns such as unusual file downloads, mass document access, or attempts at data exfiltration. It leverages machine learning to calculate risk scores, trigger alerts, and provide security teams with detailed investigative cases. Insider Risk Management also integrates with Data Loss Prevention to enhance detection capabilities. By combining behavioral analytics, risk scoring, and centralized alerting, it allows organizations to proactively mitigate insider threats while maintaining compliance and privacy.
Question 170
Your organization wants to detect and protect against threats targeting Azure SQL databases, such as SQL injection, anomalous queries, and privilege abuse. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for SQL
B) Azure Key Vault
C) Azure Policy
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for SQL
Explanation:
Azure Key Vault manages cryptographic keys, secrets, and certificates but does not monitor database activity, detect SQL injection attempts, or protect against privilege abuse. Its function is focused on secrets management rather than database threat protection.
Azure Policy enforces configuration compliance and ensures resources adhere to predefined standards. While useful for governance, it does not detect runtime attacks, anomalous queries, or privilege misuse within SQL databases.
Azure Firewall enforces network security rules to filter traffic, blocking malicious IPs and controlling network flows. However, it cannot inspect SQL queries, prevent injection attacks, or detect anomalous database activity.
Microsoft Defender for SQL provides advanced threat protection for Azure SQL databases. It monitors database activity to detect suspicious queries, SQL injection attempts, privilege abuse, and unauthorized access. It offers vulnerability assessment, security recommendations, and integrates with Microsoft Defender for Cloud for centralized monitoring. By combining runtime monitoring, alerts, and remediation guidance, Defender for SQL enables organizations to secure databases from internal and external threats while ensuring compliance and visibility across all workloads. Its comprehensive approach to database security makes it the correct solution.
Question 171
Your organization wants to implement adaptive access policies based on real-time user risk, device compliance, and location. Which solution should you prioritize?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access
Explanation:
Microsoft Purview Information Protection classifies and protects sensitive content across Microsoft 365 by applying labels, encryption, and DLP policies. While critical for data governance, it does not evaluate real-time risk signals from users or devices, and cannot enforce adaptive access policies. Its function is data protection rather than dynamic access control.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on protecting endpoints from malware, ransomware, and exploit attacks. While it can assess device posture and provide threat intelligence, it does not directly enforce access policies based on user risk or session context. Its primary focus is endpoint threat detection and response.
Azure Firewall provides network-level security by filtering inbound and outbound traffic and blocking malicious connections. While it is vital for protecting network resources, it does not evaluate identity risk, device compliance, or session-level context, making it unsuitable for adaptive access enforcement.
Azure AD Conditional Access is designed specifically for implementing Zero Trust principles by evaluating user identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals in real-time. Conditional Access policies can require Multi-Factor Authentication, restrict access to managed devices, or block sessions with high risk. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Defender for Identity and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps to leverage risk detection and session insights. By combining adaptive access enforcement with policy-driven security, Conditional Access ensures that only authorized users on compliant devices can access resources, reducing exposure to compromised credentials, risky sessions, and potential breaches. Its ability to dynamically adapt to contextual risk signals makes it the ideal solution for organizations seeking robust Zero Trust implementation.
Question 172
Your security team wants to detect anomalous user behavior in Microsoft 365, including unusual downloads, email forwarding, or document sharing patterns. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection analyzes authentication events and identifies risky sign-ins or compromised accounts. While important for identity security, it does not monitor post-authentication user behavior, such as document downloads or sharing activity, making it insufficient for detecting insider threats.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on detecting and responding to malware, ransomware, and exploits on devices. It does not provide behavioral analytics for cloud-based user activities or Microsoft 365 workloads, limiting its ability to detect insider threats.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention identifies sensitive data and enforces policies to prevent accidental or intentional data leaks. While it protects content, it does not provide risk scoring or alerts based on behavioral anomalies indicative of insider threats. Its primary function is data governance, not user behavior analysis.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management continuously monitors user activity across Microsoft 365 workloads, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It applies machine learning to detect anomalous behaviors such as excessive downloads, unauthorized document sharing, and suspicious email forwarding. The solution calculates risk scores, generates alerts, and provides case management for security teams to investigate and remediate potential insider threats. Integration with DLP enhances the ability to correlate risky behaviors with sensitive data, providing comprehensive insight and proactive mitigation. This makes Insider Risk Management the correct solution for monitoring and responding to internal threats while maintaining organizational compliance and data security.
Question 173
Your company wants to enforce least-privilege administrative access with just-in-time activation and audit logging for Azure AD roles. Which solution should you use?
A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
B) Microsoft Defender for Identity
C) Microsoft Intune
D) Azure AD Conditional Access
Answer: A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Identity detects suspicious activities in Active Directory environments, such as lateral movement and Pass-the-Ticket attacks. While it provides critical monitoring and alerting capabilities, it does not manage administrative roles or enforce time-limited privileges. Its scope is threat detection rather than privilege management.
Microsoft Intune enforces device compliance and security policies but does not manage administrative privileges in Azure AD. While it can integrate with Conditional Access, it cannot provide just-in-time role activation or audit logging for privileged accounts.
Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies based on user, device, and risk context. While useful for controlling resource access, it does not manage administrative privileges or enable temporary role elevation.
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enables organizations to enforce least-privilege principles by providing time-bound role activation for privileged accounts. It requires approval workflows, Multi-Factor Authentication, and provides comprehensive audit logs for all activations. PIM reduces the risks associated with standing privileges and ensures accountability by documenting who activates roles, when, and for how long. Integration with Azure AD and Microsoft 365 ensures consistent enforcement across the hybrid environment. Its ability to combine temporary access, auditing, and approval workflows makes it the ideal solution for managing privileged access securely.
Question 174
Your organization wants to monitor endpoint devices for threats, vulnerabilities, and compliance posture, and automate responses to detected security incidents. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Azure Firewall
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Azure Firewall provides network traffic filtering and security at the perimeter but does not monitor endpoint devices, detect malware, or automate incident response. Its primary function is network protection, not endpoint security.
Azure AD Identity Protection evaluates identity and sign-in risks but does not detect malware or vulnerabilities on endpoint devices. While it mitigates identity compromise, it cannot respond to endpoint threats.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention protects sensitive data from accidental or malicious exposure but does not monitor device posture, detect malware, or perform automated responses to incidents. Its focus is content governance rather than endpoint security.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint delivers comprehensive endpoint protection, including real-time threat detection, behavior-based analytics, exploit prevention, and vulnerability assessment. It automates incident investigation and response through playbooks, isolating compromised devices, remediating threats, and notifying security teams. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel allows centralized alerting and correlation across the environment. By combining threat protection, compliance monitoring, and automated remediation, Defender for Endpoint ensures endpoints remain secure and reduces the operational burden on security teams. Its proactive detection and response capabilities make it the correct solution for comprehensive endpoint security.
Question 175
Your company wants to continuously monitor cloud resources across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud for misconfigurations, security violations, and compliance issues. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive solution that provides continuous Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) capabilities across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud environments. Its primary focus is ensuring that cloud resources are configured securely, aligned with compliance standards, and resilient against misconfigurations that could expose the organization to threats. Defender for Cloud continuously evaluates workloads, including virtual machines, databases, storage accounts, containers, and network configurations, to identify deviations from recommended security practices and compliance frameworks such as NIST, CIS, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. By integrating with native cloud provider APIs, it collects telemetry and configuration data in real time, enabling security teams to gain full visibility into the current state of cloud resources. The platform provides risk-prioritized recommendations, highlighting the most critical misconfigurations that need remediation to reduce the attack surface. These recommendations often include step-by-step guidance or automated workflows that help administrators implement fixes efficiently, ensuring that resources adhere to security best practices consistently.
Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to monitor and mitigate identity-related risks. It focuses on detecting risky sign-ins, compromised accounts, and unusual user behavior to enforce adaptive policies, such as requiring Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or blocking access from high-risk devices. While it is essential for identity and access security, Identity Protection does not provide visibility into cloud infrastructure, evaluate resource configurations, or enforce compliance across multi-cloud environments. Its monitoring is primarily identity-centric and does not address security or misconfiguration issues at the infrastructure or workload level. Organizations relying solely on Identity Protection would not gain actionable insights into resource security or compliance status across their cloud workloads.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection specializes in data classification, labeling, and protection. It helps organizations discover, classify, and apply sensitivity labels to data across Microsoft 365 and third-party environments, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations and internal governance policies. Although Purview strengthens data governance and protects sensitive information, it does not provide visibility into the security configuration of cloud infrastructure. It cannot detect misconfigured virtual machines, databases, or network resources, nor can it assess compliance with cloud security frameworks. Purview is data-focused, concentrating on the protection of sensitive content rather than the configuration and security posture of the cloud environment itself.
Azure Firewall is a network security service that controls inbound and outbound traffic, enforces application-level rules, and protects the network perimeter from unauthorized or malicious access. While critical for network-level protection, Azure Firewall does not evaluate resource configurations, monitor cloud workloads for misconfigurations, or provide compliance assessments across multiple cloud platforms. Its enforcement occurs at the network boundary, and it lacks the continuous assessment and remediation capabilities that CSPM solutions like Defender for Cloud provide. Organizations relying solely on Azure Firewall would have strong network defense but would remain vulnerable to configuration errors, insecure deployments, or compliance violations in their cloud workloads.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the correct solution because it combines proactive assessment, continuous monitoring, and actionable recommendations for multi-cloud environments. It helps organizations implement preventative security measures by highlighting misconfigurations before they are exploited and enables detective capabilities through real-time alerts when deviations occur. Its CSPM functionality ensures that resources remain compliant with regulatory and industry standards, while its CWPP features provide protection for workloads by detecting vulnerabilities, insecure configurations, and suspicious activities. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel enhances incident management by correlating alerts from Defender for Cloud with broader security signals across the enterprise, allowing security teams to respond effectively to potential threats.
The platform’s risk-prioritized approach ensures that security teams focus on the most critical issues first, optimizing resource allocation and reducing exposure. Defender for Cloud also includes automated remediation options, which help administrators quickly apply recommended fixes or policies to maintain a secure posture. Its visibility into multi-cloud environments provides detailed reporting, dashboards, and compliance scores that track progress over time, demonstrating alignment with security frameworks and regulatory requirements. The service enables organizations to maintain control over complex cloud environments, reduce risk from misconfigurations, and improve overall security and compliance maturity.
By continuously monitoring multi-cloud workloads, integrating with native APIs, and providing actionable guidance, Microsoft Defender for Cloud ensures that organizations can implement both preventative and detective security measures. Its combination of CSPM and CWPP features addresses the need for comprehensive cloud security, enabling IT and security teams to maintain a strong and compliant security posture across all deployed cloud resources. Unlike Identity Protection, which focuses on user identity, or Purview, which focuses on data governance, or Azure Firewall, which focuses on network traffic, Defender for Cloud addresses the complete security and compliance lifecycle for multi-cloud infrastructure. Its capabilities provide organizations with the tools and visibility required to protect their cloud environment effectively while maintaining regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
Question 176
Your organization wants to enforce policies that automatically protect sensitive documents containing personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data across Microsoft 365. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Azure AD Conditional Access
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on detecting malware, ransomware, and exploits on endpoints. While it enhances device security, it does not classify, label, or protect sensitive content within Microsoft 365 workloads. Its primary focus is threat detection and endpoint remediation rather than data governance.
Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies based on user, device, and risk context. While it can restrict access to sensitive data based on compliance, it does not analyze document content or apply protection automatically. Its function is access control, not content protection.
Azure Firewall provides network-level security by filtering inbound and outbound traffic. Although it is crucial for perimeter protection, it cannot classify or automatically protect sensitive data in documents or emails within Microsoft 365. Its enforcement occurs at the network layer rather than at the content level.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection automatically classifies and labels sensitive data across Microsoft 365 services, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It identifies PII, financial data, and other regulatory content using predefined or custom sensitive information types. Labels can enforce encryption, restrict sharing, and apply audit controls, ensuring that sensitive content is protected wherever it is stored or shared. The solution provides automated enforcement, reducing reliance on manual processes and minimizing human error. Integration with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention enhances monitoring and policy enforcement, while reporting capabilities provide visibility and compliance tracking. By combining automatic classification, labeling, and protection, Purview Information Protection ensures sensitive data remains secure and compliant across the organization.
Question 177
Your company wants to monitor hybrid identity environments to detect Pass-the-Ticket, Golden Ticket, and lateral movement attacks. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
B) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
C) Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
Explanation:
Azure AD Privileged Identity Management focuses on managing just-in-time access to privileged accounts, enforcing MFA, and providing audit logs for administrative role activations. While it strengthens privileged account security, it does not detect lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket attacks, or Golden Ticket attacks within on-premises or hybrid Active Directory environments. Its scope is privilege management rather than threat detection.
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management analyzes user behavior within Microsoft 365 to detect insider threats, including unusual downloads, email forwarding, or document sharing. While effective for internal risk monitoring, it does not detect attacks targeting Active Directory authentication or monitor lateral movement between systems. Its focus is behavioral analytics rather than identity attack detection.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides endpoint protection, monitoring devices for malware, exploits, and threats. Although endpoints may be part of attack paths, Defender for Endpoint does not analyze authentication logs, detect Golden Ticket attacks, or track lateral movement in Active Directory.
Microsoft Defender for Identity continuously monitors on-premises Active Directory and hybrid environments to detect identity-based threats such as lateral movement, Pass-the-Ticket, and Golden Ticket attacks. It analyzes authentication traffic, network sessions, and system logs using machine learning and behavioral analytics to detect suspicious patterns. Alerts are generated for security teams to investigate and respond proactively. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel enables centralized monitoring and response orchestration. By focusing specifically on identity threats in hybrid environments, Defender for Identity provides comprehensive protection against advanced attacks targeting privileged and standard accounts, making it the optimal solution.
Question 178
Your organization wants to detect risky cloud applications and shadow IT usage while enforcing access policies for approved SaaS apps. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Intune
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that provides organizations with deep visibility, monitoring, and control over cloud application usage. One of its primary functions is cloud discovery, which allows IT teams to detect unsanctioned or risky applications being used by employees outside the visibility of IT management, commonly known as shadow IT. By analyzing network traffic logs, user activity, and SaaS environment usage, Defender for Cloud Apps identifies applications in use, calculates their risk score, and provides actionable insights for administrators. The risk assessment considers factors such as compliance with regulatory standards, encryption, authentication methods, and potential security vulnerabilities. This helps organizations differentiate between sanctioned, safe applications and those that may pose data security risks. Real-time monitoring of application activity enables continuous evaluation of usage patterns, including potentially unauthorized access, risky downloads, or data sharing outside approved channels.
Azure AD Conditional Access enforces policies for access to cloud applications based on signals such as user identity, device compliance, location, and risk. While Conditional Access is critical for managing who can access SaaS resources and under what conditions, its capabilities are limited to access enforcement. It does not provide the visibility needed to discover unsanctioned applications or evaluate the risk associated with cloud apps. Conditional Access works effectively in tandem with a CASB like Defender for Cloud Apps by enforcing policies for applications identified as approved or high risk, but on its own, it cannot detect shadow IT or evaluate cloud application risks comprehensively. Its scope focuses on identity-driven access rather than application discovery or continuous monitoring of app usage.
Microsoft Intune is a device management solution that allows organizations to manage endpoint compliance, deploy applications, and enforce device-level security configurations. Intune ensures that devices meet security standards and provides reporting on compliance, which can feed into Conditional Access policies. While Intune contributes to a secure environment by ensuring that devices accessing cloud applications are compliant, it does not provide cloud app discovery or real-time monitoring of application activity. Its functionality is limited to endpoint management, making it insufficient for detecting unsanctioned applications, evaluating cloud risk, or implementing session-level controls within SaaS platforms. Intune’s focus is device-centric, rather than application- or data-centric.
Azure Firewall is a network-level security solution designed to filter network traffic, block malicious IP addresses, enforce application rules, and protect organizational network perimeters. It provides visibility into network connections and can block traffic from risky sources or to unsafe destinations. However, Azure Firewall does not analyze SaaS application usage, detect shadow IT, or assess the risk of cloud applications. It cannot enforce policies within cloud application sessions or prevent risky behavior such as unauthorized data downloads or sharing. Its role is limited to network security rather than providing detailed application discovery or governance for cloud workloads.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is the appropriate solution for organizations that need comprehensive visibility into cloud application usage and effective risk management. By continuously monitoring user activity across SaaS platforms, it enables organizations to discover unsanctioned applications, assign risk scores, and enforce policies that prevent data exfiltration or other risky actions. Defender for Cloud Apps integrates seamlessly with Conditional Access to enforce adaptive access policies, ensuring that only users meeting security and compliance requirements can access high-risk applications. Administrators can configure session-level controls to block specific actions, such as downloading sensitive data to unmanaged devices or copying confidential files to personal storage. This combination of cloud app discovery, risk evaluation, and policy enforcement supports a Zero Trust security model, where access and actions are continuously monitored, and only secure, compliant behavior is permitted.
Defender for Cloud Apps provides detailed reporting and dashboards that give IT and security teams insight into cloud app usage trends, user behavior, and potential policy violations. By analyzing network logs, API calls, and SaaS telemetry, the service helps organizations identify employees using unsanctioned applications, understand the nature of their activities, and determine the risk associated with each app. Administrators can then sanction safe applications while restricting or blocking risky ones. This not only reduces the potential for data leakage but also strengthens governance over SaaS environments. Unlike Conditional Access, which controls access but lacks discovery, or Intune, which manages endpoints without monitoring applications, Defender for Cloud Apps offers a holistic approach to SaaS security. Azure Firewall complements network protection but cannot provide detailed cloud app insight.
Through its risk scoring and policy enforcement features, Defender for Cloud Apps ensures that sensitive data is protected regardless of where it resides in the cloud ecosystem. Organizations can apply labels, enforce encryption, restrict sharing, or block downloads based on the risk associated with the application or session. The CASB also supports integration with other Microsoft security solutions, creating a unified security environment that addresses threats across identity, device, application, and data layers. By providing real-time monitoring, discovery of shadow IT, actionable insights, and enforcement capabilities, Defender for Cloud Apps empowers organizations to reduce risks associated with unauthorized SaaS usage while maintaining operational efficiency. It enables IT teams to implement proactive security strategies, manage sanctioned applications, and ensure regulatory compliance across diverse cloud environments.
Defender for Cloud Apps’ combination of cloud app discovery, usage visibility, risk evaluation, and policy enforcement makes it uniquely positioned to address the challenges of modern SaaS usage. Organizations benefit from automated monitoring, detailed reporting, and adaptive access enforcement, ensuring that sensitive data remains secure while enabling productive use of cloud services. By integrating seamlessly with Conditional Access and other Microsoft security tools, it delivers a comprehensive, layered defense against the risks associated with shadow IT and unsanctioned application usage. Its capabilities support Zero Trust principles by continuously assessing risk, enforcing policy, and protecting data in real time, making it essential for organizations seeking to maintain control over their cloud environments while mitigating threats effectively.
Question 179
Your company wants to continuously monitor the security posture of Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud resources, identify misconfigurations, and provide prioritized recommendations for remediation. Which solution should you use?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Azure Policy
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Azure Security Center
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Explanation:
Azure Policy enforces configuration compliance within Azure subscriptions. While effective for ensuring resources adhere to organizational standards, it does not extend to AWS or Google Cloud environments, and it lacks continuous risk prioritization or actionable remediation guidance for multicloud resources.
Microsoft Sentinel aggregates logs and security events from multiple sources for threat detection and incident response. While powerful for monitoring and alerting, Sentinel does not provide automated misconfiguration assessment, compliance evaluation, or multicloud resource recommendations.
Azure Security Center focuses on posture management and threat detection within Azure. Although valuable for Azure resources, it does not provide comprehensive visibility or security recommendations for other cloud providers, limiting its multicloud capabilities.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud. It continuously identifies misconfigurations, evaluates compliance against industry frameworks, and prioritizes recommendations based on risk severity. Integration with native cloud APIs allows accurate, real-time monitoring of workloads, while its Secure Score feature helps organizations track improvements and maintain consistent security across all cloud environments. Defender for Cloud also includes Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) capabilities, enabling threat detection for workloads and containers. By combining CSPM and CWPP, it provides actionable insights to improve security posture and maintain compliance across multicloud deployments, making it the correct solution.
Question 180
Your organization wants to enforce conditional access for cloud applications, requiring devices to meet compliance requirements before granting access. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Intune
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: B) Azure AD Conditional Access
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access is a critical component of Microsoft’s Zero Trust security framework, enabling organizations to evaluate and control access to cloud applications in real-time. Conditional Access policies leverage contextual signals such as device compliance, user location, risk assessment, and authentication strength to determine whether access should be granted, denied, or require additional verification steps. By integrating with Microsoft Intune, Conditional Access can assess device compliance by checking whether devices meet organizational security standards, such as having encryption enabled, up-to-date antivirus protection, a compliant operating system version, or configured security settings. If a device is found to be non-compliant, Conditional Access can block access to cloud applications or require step-up authentication, such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), before allowing access. This ensures that only trusted, secure devices can connect to corporate resources, reducing the likelihood of unauthorized access and enhancing the organization’s overall security posture.
Microsoft Intune is an endpoint management solution that allows administrators to configure device compliance policies, manage security settings, and enforce configuration standards across mobile devices, desktops, and laptops. Intune can evaluate device health and compliance status and report this data to other services such as Conditional Access. While Intune is essential for maintaining a secure and compliant device environment, it does not independently enforce access policies to cloud applications. It provides the compliance information required for access decisions but relies on Conditional Access to take real-time enforcement actions. Without Conditional Access, Intune’s evaluation of compliance alone cannot prevent non-compliant devices from accessing sensitive cloud resources, leaving potential security gaps.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is an advanced endpoint protection platform designed to detect, prevent, and respond to threats such as malware, ransomware, and sophisticated attacks on devices. It provides security insights, threat detection, and automated remediation for endpoint threats. While Defender for Endpoint can assess device health and integrate with Conditional Access to provide additional security signals, it does not independently enforce access policies to cloud applications. Its primary function is protecting the device and monitoring for threats rather than evaluating access conditions for cloud resources. Using Defender for Endpoint alone will strengthen endpoint security, but it cannot enforce adaptive access policies or ensure that only compliant devices gain access to cloud applications.
Azure Firewall is a network security service that filters inbound and outbound traffic, enforcing perimeter-level protection, network segmentation, and application-level rules. While it is important for network security, Azure Firewall does not evaluate device compliance or enforce access policies for cloud applications. Its enforcement occurs at the network level, controlling which network traffic is allowed or denied, rather than at the identity or session level. Therefore, it cannot provide the granular, contextual access control needed to implement a Zero Trust approach based on device compliance, risk scores, or authentication strength. Organizations relying solely on Azure Firewall would lack adaptive access control for cloud resources.
Azure AD Conditional Access becomes the correct solution because it directly evaluates access requests against defined security policies and contextual signals. By combining Conditional Access with device compliance data from Intune, organizations can ensure that only authorized and secure devices access critical applications. Conditional Access policies can require MFA, restrict access from high-risk locations, block non-compliant devices, or enforce session-specific controls. This integration provides a dynamic, real-time enforcement mechanism that aligns with modern Zero Trust security principles. The policies are adaptive, continuously monitoring for changes in user behavior, device compliance, and risk assessment. This approach reduces the attack surface, protects sensitive data, and ensures that access decisions are based on both user identity and device health.
Furthermore, Conditional Access supports granular policy application. Administrators can target specific users, groups, applications, or cloud resources, defining policies tailored to varying levels of sensitivity and risk tolerance. By enforcing these policies dynamically, Conditional Access mitigates threats from compromised credentials, unauthorized devices, or risky sign-ins, while minimizing friction for compliant and trusted users. The integration with Microsoft Intune and security solutions like Defender for Endpoint enhances its effectiveness by providing additional compliance signals and threat intelligence. This unified approach allows organizations to maintain productivity without compromising security, as access policies automatically adapt to real-time conditions, maintaining strict controls over who, what, and from where access occurs.
By leveraging Azure AD Conditional Access, organizations gain a robust mechanism to enforce adaptive, risk-based access policies across all cloud applications, ensuring that only compliant, secure devices can connect. It provides visibility into access patterns, threat signals, and compliance status, enabling continuous improvement of security posture. Unlike Intune, which manages devices but does not enforce access; Defender for Endpoint, which focuses on device security without access control; or Azure Firewall, which protects networks without evaluating device compliance, Conditional Access integrates identity, device, and contextual signals into a coherent enforcement framework. This makes it essential for organizations seeking to implement a Zero Trust strategy, protecting resources while maintaining operational efficiency and minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.