Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-100 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 106

Your organization wants to enforce a Zero Trust framework for all externally accessed applications. You need to ensure that access is allowed only when user identity risk, device health, and sign-in context meet your security requirements. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access plays a central role in securing access to modern enterprise applications by combining identity signals, device health information, user behavior, and risk levels to determine whether access should be granted, blocked, or restricted. It is designed to support Zero Trust principles where trust is not granted automatically based on network location; instead, identity and context must satisfy defined criteria. This makes it especially effective when organizations need fine-grained control over how and when users can connect to cloud resources. The solution can enforce requirements such as multifactor authentication, compliant device status, approved applications, and session control through integration with other services like Defender for Cloud Apps. This dynamic enforcement mechanism ensures that only legitimate, low-risk interactions are allowed.

Microsoft Sentinel serves a different purpose by offering advanced threat detection, correlation, and incident response capabilities. Although it helps in monitoring risky activities, it does not act as an enforcement point. Instead, it aggregates logs and alerts from various systems and uses analytics to detect anomalies. While valuable for security operations teams, it cannot directly restrict access to applications based on user context, making it less aligned with goals that involve real-time access control.

Microsoft Purview focuses on protecting data across the organization through governance, classification, and compliance capabilities. It helps identify sensitive information, enforce labeling, and ensure regulatory alignment, but it is not designed to process real-time identity signals or enforce access conditions. That makes it unsuitable for scenarios requiring instant decisions based on user state or device posture.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud strengthens cloud security posture, monitors workloads, and evaluates misconfigurations. It helps ensure that resources are deployed securely and remain compliant with security benchmarks. Although it provides valuable insights and recommendations, it does not function as an identity-driven access enforcement tool that evaluates session and user risk in real time.

The most effective Zero Trust strategies rely heavily on controlling who can access applications and under what conditions. Azure AD Conditional Access excels here, offering an adaptive framework that continuously evaluates identity-based risk, device compliance, geolocation, and IP reputation. It can integrate identity protection signals to detect unusual sign-in patterns and block high-risk users automatically. Additionally, it supports session controls that allow organizations to monitor and limit activities within an application, rather than making only binary access decisions. This approach safeguards sensitive applications by ensuring they are accessed only when the full context meets predefined security standards. Given the scope of Zero Trust requirements, Azure AD Conditional Access aligns perfectly with the organization’s objective of enforcing a contextual, risk-aware access model.

Question 107

You need to design a solution to detect insider threats by analyzing user behavior patterns, anomalies, and historical activity across Microsoft 365 services. Which service should you choose?

A) Microsoft Sentinel
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) Microsoft Sentinel

Explanation:

Microsoft Sentinel provides the threat detection, analytics, and behavioral insights needed to identify insider threats effectively. Insider threats are often difficult to detect because they originate from legitimate users who already possess authorized access to resources. To identify such scenarios, organizations require deep visibility across logs, activities, and patterns over time. Sentinel excels in this area by ingesting signals from many Microsoft 365 services including SharePoint, Exchange, Teams, Azure AD, and Defender products. By applying machine learning and advanced analytics, Sentinel identifies anomalous actions such as unusual file downloads, login attempts from atypical locations, or shifts in access patterns that differ from a user’s baseline behavior.

Azure AD Conditional Access focuses on enforcing access decisions at the point of sign-in. It evaluates contextual signals and enforces requirements such as MFA or device compliance. While useful for limiting risky access attempts, it does not analyze long-term behavioral patterns or historical activity. Its primary function is access enforcement, not insider threat detection, making it unsuitable for identifying slow-developing or stealthy malicious activity over extended periods.

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management provides tools for managing retention and deletion of organizational content. It ensures that data follows its required lifecycle and complies with regulatory or business-driven retention policies. Although Purview has valuable governance capabilities, it does not provide analytics that detect suspicious behaviors or anomalies across user interactions within Microsoft 365 applications.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint focuses on protecting devices against malware, exploits, and suspicious activities occurring directly on endpoints. While it monitors behavior on devices and can detect malicious actions initiated through compromised endpoints, it does not cover the broader range of insider threat signals across cloud services, identity systems, or collaboration applications.

Insider threats often manifest subtly through gradual shifts in user behavior—unexpected increases in file access volumes, access from unusual locations, repeated attempts to view restricted content, or anomalous collaboration patterns. Sentinel’s machine learning models and ability to correlate signals across multiple platforms make it uniquely capable of identifying such patterns. It can automatically generate alerts, trigger automated responses through playbooks, or provide contextual evidence for security operations teams. This holistic approach across services is essential for reliable detection. Therefore, Microsoft Sentinel is the most appropriate and comprehensive solution for uncovering insider threats across Microsoft 365 environments.

Question 108

Your organization wants to automatically classify and protect sensitive information stored in SharePoint Online documents. Which solution should you deploy?

A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
B) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Azure AD Conditional Access

Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection enables organizations to classify, label, and protect sensitive data across Microsoft 365 services, including SharePoint Online. It provides automated classification that identifies sensitive information like financial records, personal data, intellectual property, and regulatory content using pre-built or custom sensitivity rules. Purview can automatically apply labels that enforce encryption, content marking, and restrictions on sharing. These protections persist with the document regardless of location, ensuring end-to-end data security. This makes it an ideal solution when organizations seek automatic and consistent protection of sensitive documents.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud focuses on cloud security posture management, threat detection, and compliance for Azure workloads. It evaluates infrastructure for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, but it does not classify documents or apply labels in SharePoint Online. Its purpose is infrastructure-level security rather than document-level data protection.

Microsoft Sentinel provides SIEM capabilities for aggregating logs, detecting threats, and identifying anomalies. While Sentinel helps correlate large-scale security events, it does not perform real-time document classification or labeling. It lacks the functionality required to apply data protection policies directly to SharePoint documents.

Azure AD Conditional Access is used for access control decisions based on identity and device context. Although it can restrict who can access SharePoint Online, it does not operate inside documents nor classify or protect the data stored there. Its focus is on controlling access rather than enforcing content-level protections.

Protection of sensitive data stored in cloud collaboration environments requires automated mechanisms to prevent accidental or unauthorized exposure. Purview Information Protection operates directly within Microsoft 365 applications. It supports auto-labeling policies that scan content continuously and apply labels even after documents are modified. It also integrates with Data Loss Prevention policies to ensure sensitive content is not improperly shared. This comprehensive capability ensures consistent and automatic enforcement of data protection rules. Therefore, Microsoft Purview Information Protection is the correct solution for classifying and protecting sensitive information within SharePoint Online.

Question 109

You need to ensure privileged accounts in Azure AD follow just-in-time (JIT) principles and have elevated access only when required. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
B) Microsoft Purview
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management

Explanation:

Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides just-in-time access management for privileged roles in Azure AD, Microsoft 365, and Azure resources. It ensures that accounts are not permanently assigned elevated permissions, reducing the attack surface and enforcing accountability. PIM requires users to activate roles when needed, often with approval workflows or MFA. It also logs all privileged activity for auditing and compliance purposes.

Microsoft Purview focuses on data protection and compliance rather than identity-driven privilege control. It cannot manage role activations or enforce JIT permissions for Azure AD or Azure resources.

Microsoft Sentinel provides monitoring and detection but does not manage privileged access lifecycles. It may alert on suspicious privileged activities but cannot enforce access controls.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint monitors endpoint security and device threats. It does not manage roles, permissions, or JIT access.

Privileged accounts pose significant risk if misused or compromised. PIM addresses this by minimizing standing privileges, providing detailed insights, and requiring activation workflows. Its features directly support just-in-time access models, making it the correct choice.

Question 110

You want to monitor and secure your multi-cloud environment, including Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud workloads. Which Microsoft solution should you choose?

A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Microsoft Purview
C) Azure AD Conditional Access
D) Microsoft Sentinel

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides cloud security posture management and workload protection for Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud environments. It evaluates configurations, identifies vulnerabilities, and provides recommendations to improve security posture across all connected cloud platforms. Defender for Cloud also offers workload protection for virtual machines, containers, databases, and applications. Its ability to secure multi-cloud resources makes it the ideal choice when organizations operate across multiple cloud platforms.

Microsoft Purview focuses on governance and data compliance. It does not evaluate cloud configurations or provide workload protection.

Azure AD Conditional Access provides identity-based access policies but does not secure multi-cloud workloads.

Microsoft Sentinel offers SIEM capabilities but does not provide posture management or workload protection. It can ingest cloud security logs but does not actively secure workloads.

Defender for Cloud’s multi-cloud capabilities enable unified security posture management, making it the correct solution for securing workloads across Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Question 111

Your organization wants to detect and respond to anomalous activities within Azure virtual machines using behavioral analytics. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides behavioral analytics and threat detection for Azure virtual machines. It identifies suspicious activities such as unusual process execution, unexpected network connections, brute-force attempts, and privilege escalation. It integrates threat intelligence and machine learning to detect risks early and provides actionable alerts and recommendations for remediation.

Azure AD Conditional Access focuses on controlling access based on identity signals, not VM activity analysis.

Microsoft Purview handles data governance and compliance, not VM behavior.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint monitors endpoint devices, but Azure VM-level security is best handled through Defender for Cloud’s server protection capabilities.

Therefore, Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the correct solution for behavioral and threat analytics on Azure VMs.

Question 112

You need to automatically block access to corporate resources when users exhibit risky sign-in behavior. Which service should you use?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Answer: A) Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection is an advanced service designed to identify, detect, and respond to potential identity-based risks in an organization. Its core functionality revolves around continuously monitoring user sign-in activity, tracking unusual patterns, and identifying behaviors that could indicate compromised credentials or risky activities. By leveraging sophisticated machine learning algorithms and heuristics, it assigns a risk score to each user and each sign-in event, enabling administrators to prioritize remediation efforts effectively. The service provides actionable insights and recommendations, including prompting for password changes, enforcing multi-factor authentication, or restricting access for users exhibiting suspicious behavior. Organizations can define automated policies that respond to risk events in real-time, reducing reliance on manual intervention and ensuring that security measures scale with organizational needs. Continuous monitoring by Identity Protection ensures that security gaps are minimized, user accounts remain safeguarded, and potential threats are addressed proactively.

Microsoft Sentinel functions as a cloud-native security information and event management (SIEM) solution. It collects logs and telemetry from a wide range of sources across an organization, enabling detection, investigation, and response to security incidents at a macro level. Sentinel provides advanced analytics, correlation rules, and threat intelligence to identify suspicious activity and emerging threats. However, its primary focus is infrastructure and security events across the enterprise rather than directly monitoring and remediating identity-based risks. Sentinel can alert administrators to anomalous user behavior indirectly, but it lacks the built-in automated identity remediation workflows present in Azure AD Identity Protection. Sentinel is essential for broader threat detection, centralized monitoring, and security orchestration, but when the goal is direct identity risk management, its capabilities are complementary rather than core.

Microsoft Purview is a comprehensive data governance, compliance, and risk management platform. It offers tools for discovering, classifying, labeling, and protecting sensitive data across Microsoft 365, Azure, and other enterprise data sources. Purview supports regulatory compliance reporting, data loss prevention, and auditing of sensitive content usage. While it strengthens organizational compliance and improves visibility into data assets, Purview does not focus on monitoring identity-related risks or automating remediation for compromised user accounts. Its primary function is data-centric governance, ensuring sensitive information is protected and regulatory requirements are met rather than proactively detecting and mitigating identity threats.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides cloud security posture management (CSPM) and workload protection for Azure and hybrid environments. It continuously evaluates security configurations, identifies vulnerabilities, and offers recommendations to strengthen defenses across cloud resources. Defender for Cloud can protect virtual machines, storage accounts, applications, and network configurations from misconfigurations or threats. However, it does not directly monitor user sign-ins, evaluate identity risks, or implement automated identity-based remediations. Its strength lies in securing resources rather than user accounts, making it critical for protecting the cloud environment but not suitable as a standalone identity protection solution.

Azure AD Identity Protection emerges as the appropriate choice due to its focus on identity-centric security. It integrates tightly with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, enabling administrators to establish conditional access policies, risk-based access controls, and automated responses to identity threats. Organizations benefit from continuous monitoring of accounts, real-time risk scoring, and automated interventions such as forced multi-factor authentication or account restrictions. This service is particularly effective in environments with high volumes of users and frequent access events, as it scales to monitor large datasets while maintaining proactive threat mitigation. By assessing risky sign-ins, monitoring unusual patterns, and applying remediation actions automatically, Identity Protection reduces the likelihood of compromised accounts being exploited. It provides administrators with visibility into potential vulnerabilities, detailed reporting, and the ability to track improvements in organizational security posture over time.

Unlike Microsoft Sentinel, which analyzes broader security signals, or Microsoft Purview, which governs data, Azure AD Identity Protection concentrates on identity risk management, offering precise control over user access and automated protection mechanisms. Defender for Cloud complements resource security rather than identity security, leaving a gap that Identity Protection fills comprehensively. This integration ensures that organizations can maintain secure access across applications, enforce compliance requirements for user authentication, and respond dynamically to evolving threats. By leveraging these capabilities, administrators can enforce policies that reduce the attack surface associated with compromised accounts, detect anomalies that may indicate credential theft, and apply remediation automatically to mitigate risks efficiently. It provides a proactive framework that aligns identity security with organizational access control, ensuring users are authenticated securely while mitigating the risks of unauthorized access or insider threats. Continuous learning and adaptation through risk scoring, anomaly detection, and automated remediation make Azure AD Identity Protection a critical tool for any enterprise prioritizing identity security, seamless user access, and operational efficiency in threat management.

Question 113

You want to secure sensitive data stored in Teams, including chat messages and shared files. Which solution provides classification and protection capabilities?

A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Explanation:

Purview Information Protection can classify and protect sensitive data across Teams messages and files. It uses sensitivity labels to enforce encryption, restrict sharing, and control data usage.

Defender for Endpoint protects devices, not cloud-stored data.

Sentinel monitors activity but does not classify content.

Defender for Cloud secures infrastructure, not Teams content.

Purview’s ability to classify and protect content at the data level makes it the right choice.

Question 114

You need to monitor security logs from Azure, hybrid servers, and on-premises firewalls in a single centralized system. Which solution should you use?

A) Microsoft Sentinel
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) Microsoft Sentinel

Explanation:

Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution that provides centralized security monitoring across complex IT environments. It collects and ingests logs from a variety of sources, including cloud platforms such as Azure and AWS, on-premises servers, and hybrid systems. By aggregating this data into a single platform, Sentinel allows security teams to gain visibility into all aspects of their IT infrastructure. Its advanced analytics and correlation rules are designed to detect patterns indicative of security incidents, such as suspicious logins, abnormal resource access, lateral movement, or privilege escalation attempts. Automated response capabilities, including playbooks built with Azure Logic Apps, enable organizations to remediate threats quickly without manual intervention. This proactive approach enhances threat detection and response, reducing dwell time for malicious actors and improving overall security posture.

Azure AD Conditional Access is primarily a tool for enforcing access policies based on conditions like user location, device compliance, or risk level. It is highly effective at controlling who can access applications and under what circumstances, but it does not collect or analyze logs across the organization. Conditional Access focuses on identity-based access management rather than broader security monitoring, so while it complements SIEM solutions, it cannot provide centralized visibility or automated threat correlation. Organizations relying solely on Conditional Access would miss the holistic monitoring that a SIEM like Sentinel offers.

Microsoft Purview is a data governance and compliance platform. It helps organizations manage sensitive information, enforce compliance policies, classify data, and maintain auditing capabilities. Purview excels in ensuring regulatory adherence and tracking data usage but does not perform centralized log aggregation or threat detection. It cannot analyze behavioral patterns across systems or trigger automated security responses based on security events. Its role is complementary to SIEM systems in terms of compliance reporting but does not fulfill the operational security monitoring requirements needed to detect and respond to threats across an enterprise environment.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust endpoint protection platform that monitors devices for malware, vulnerabilities, suspicious activity, and exploits. It provides advanced detection, automated investigation, and remediation capabilities at the device level. Defender for Endpoint enhances endpoint security but does not function as a centralized SIEM. It cannot aggregate logs from multiple environments into a unified view or perform correlation and analysis across network and cloud services. While critical for endpoint threat detection, its scope is narrower than what a company requires for comprehensive security monitoring.

Microsoft Sentinel emerges as the appropriate solution because it consolidates logs and security data from all parts of an organization’s IT environment into a single platform. By combining log collection, correlation, anomaly detection, and automated responses, Sentinel enables organizations to proactively detect threats and respond in real time. Its ability to integrate with cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments ensures that security teams have complete visibility, allowing them to identify potential incidents that could otherwise go unnoticed. Sentinel’s analytics engine uses built-in and customizable detection rules to correlate disparate events into actionable alerts. This capability is critical for identifying complex attacks that span multiple systems or services. Automated response playbooks streamline the remediation process, reduce manual workload, and minimize response times.

Furthermore, Sentinel provides dashboards and reporting tools that give security teams a comprehensive understanding of security posture and incident trends. Integration with threat intelligence feeds enhances its ability to identify emerging threats, while its scalability ensures that organizations of any size can monitor vast amounts of telemetry without sacrificing performance. Sentinel’s capacity to unify disparate data sources, detect threats proactively, and trigger automated responses positions it as the central tool for enterprise-level security monitoring. Unlike Conditional Access, which controls access, Purview, which governs data, or Defender for Endpoint, which protects devices individually, Sentinel delivers a holistic view of the entire IT environment. It empowers security teams to manage threats efficiently, improve situational awareness, and implement automated measures to address incidents as they arise. By leveraging Sentinel, organizations can reduce operational risks, improve compliance with security policies, and enhance overall resilience against cyber threats while ensuring that logs, alerts, and incidents are tracked comprehensively across every part of the organization.

Question 115

You need to prevent users from downloading sensitive files onto unmanaged devices. Which solution provides this control?

A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Conditional Access
D) Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that provides deep visibility, control, and threat protection for cloud applications. One of its key capabilities is session monitoring, which allows organizations to enforce real-time policies during active sessions. This includes blocking or restricting actions such as downloading sensitive files to unmanaged devices, copying data to unauthorized locations, or accessing services from high-risk networks. By integrating with Azure AD Conditional Access, Defender for Cloud Apps extends policy enforcement to include app-based controls. For example, Conditional Access can determine whether a device is compliant or whether a user’s session meets specific risk criteria, and then Defender for Cloud Apps can enforce download restrictions or other session-specific actions. This ensures that sensitive data remains protected even when accessed from external or unmanaged environments, mitigating the risk of data exfiltration or leakage.

Microsoft Sentinel functions as a security information and event management (SIEM) solution. It aggregates logs and telemetry from multiple sources to detect, investigate, and respond to potential security threats. Sentinel’s analytics and automated response capabilities are designed to identify anomalous activity or compromise across the enterprise infrastructure. However, it does not provide session-level enforcement or the ability to restrict user actions within cloud applications. Sentinel excels at detecting threats and correlating events, but it cannot actively prevent downloads, copying, or session-based risks. Organizations relying solely on Sentinel would lack the capability to control data movement within live application sessions, making it unsuitable for this specific requirement.

Azure AD Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce access policies based on conditions such as user, device compliance, location, and risk level. It can restrict access to applications if conditions are not met, for example, blocking a login from an unmanaged device. While Conditional Access is highly effective in controlling whether a user can access a resource, it cannot enforce granular actions inside a session, such as preventing downloads of sensitive files. Without integration with Defender for Cloud Apps, Conditional Access alone does not provide real-time session controls or app-specific restrictions. Its focus is at the access level rather than within-session behavior.

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle focuses on managing the retention, classification, and governance of organizational data. It provides tools for defining retention policies, managing lifecycle stages of content, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Purview can help determine how long sensitive data should be stored, when it should be archived, or when it should be deleted. However, it does not provide mechanisms to monitor user sessions or block data from being downloaded in real-time. While Purview is critical for compliance and governance, it does not offer the actionable session-level enforcement required to prevent sensitive file downloads onto unmanaged devices.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps becomes the correct solution because it combines cloud visibility with actionable, real-time session controls. By using Defender for Cloud Apps, organizations can detect when users attempt to access sensitive information from unmanaged devices, risky locations, or non-compliant sessions, and enforce policies that block downloads or restrict copying of data. Its integration with Conditional Access ensures that policies can be dynamically applied based on identity, device state, and risk assessment. This provides a comprehensive solution for protecting sensitive data during active cloud sessions. Administrators can define granular policies based on file sensitivity, user role, device compliance, or network location. These policies operate in real-time, providing immediate enforcement to prevent risky actions, which is critical in environments where sensitive data is frequently accessed from a mix of managed and unmanaged endpoints.

Defender for Cloud Apps also offers monitoring and reporting capabilities, giving security teams visibility into attempted policy violations, session anomalies, and risky behavior trends. It supports automated alerts and remediation actions, enabling organizations to respond to potential data exfiltration threats efficiently. By leveraging Defender for Cloud Apps alongside Conditional Access, organizations create a layered security approach that not only restricts access to sensitive resources but also controls what actions can be taken within those resources. This session-level monitoring and enforcement reduces the risk of data loss, ensures compliance with internal policies and external regulations, and provides a safeguard against accidental or malicious misuse of sensitive information. The service is especially valuable in scenarios where users need flexible access to cloud applications but security requirements demand that sensitive data remains protected in real-time, even during ongoing user sessions. This combination of visibility, control, and automation distinguishes Defender for Cloud Apps as the solution capable of addressing both access and in-session data security requirements in modern cloud environments.

Question 116

Your organization wants to enable continuous monitoring and automated remediation of misconfigurations in Azure workloads. Which solution should you deploy?

A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Azure AD Conditional Access

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud security posture management (CSPM) and cloud workload protection platform that provides continuous monitoring and assessment of cloud resources. Its primary purpose is to ensure that workloads deployed in Azure, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments remain compliant with organizational security policies and industry best practices. Defender for Cloud continuously evaluates the security configuration of virtual machines, databases, storage accounts, networking configurations, and other resources. It identifies misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and deviations from recommended security baselines. Once a misconfiguration is detected, Defender for Cloud can trigger alerts and, in many cases, use automated remediation workflows to correct the issues. This proactive approach reduces the attack surface, strengthens security, and ensures that cloud workloads adhere to compliance standards without requiring constant manual intervention from administrators.

Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution. It excels at collecting, correlating, and analyzing security telemetry across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. Sentinel provides threat detection, investigation, and automated response capabilities for security incidents. While Sentinel can detect suspicious activity and generate alerts, it does not focus on remediating misconfigurations in cloud resources or enforcing security baselines. Its primary role is threat monitoring and incident response, not proactive infrastructure hardening. Organizations using Sentinel would need to rely on other tools for automatic remediation of misconfigured resources, making it insufficient as a standalone solution for continuous security posture management.

Microsoft Purview is a comprehensive data governance and compliance platform that helps organizations classify, protect, and manage sensitive data. It provides tools for managing retention policies, data lifecycle, compliance reporting, and regulatory adherence. Purview focuses on data governance rather than infrastructure security. While it ensures that sensitive information is handled correctly and meets compliance requirements, it does not monitor cloud resource configurations or remediate misconfigurations. Its role is essential for compliance but does not address the proactive management of cloud workloads and security posture.

Azure AD Conditional Access provides identity-based access controls that determine whether users can access applications and resources based on conditions such as device compliance, location, or risk level. Conditional Access ensures secure access to applications and protects against unauthorized sign-ins. However, it does not provide visibility into resource configuration, evaluate workload security posture, or remediate misconfigurations in cloud infrastructure. Its scope is limited to controlling access rather than managing the security and compliance of resources themselves.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the correct solution because it combines continuous assessment, proactive detection, and automated remediation to maintain cloud security posture. It provides security recommendations based on built-in policies, compliance frameworks, and industry standards. These recommendations cover configuration hardening, vulnerability management, network security, identity and access management, and workload protection. The automated workflows reduce the administrative burden and ensure consistent enforcement of security controls across all workloads. Defender for Cloud also supports integration with other Microsoft security services, enabling alerting, logging, and orchestration for a comprehensive security ecosystem. Security teams can track compliance scores, monitor trends, and identify high-priority issues that require attention, creating a continuous cycle of assessment and improvement.

By using Defender for Cloud, organizations gain the ability to manage security posture effectively, enforce consistent policies, and automatically remediate risks before they are exploited. Unlike Sentinel, which focuses on threat detection, or Purview, which governs data, Defender for Cloud addresses infrastructure security at the resource level. Conditional Access complements identity security but does not monitor workloads. Defender for Cloud’s combination of assessment, automation, and remediation ensures that resources are always aligned with security standards, reduces exposure to misconfigurations, and strengthens overall cloud security. It is essential for organizations seeking proactive management of security posture and operational resilience across cloud environments.

Question 117

You need to protect sensitive financial data stored across multiple cloud applications, including Salesforce and Box. Which solution allows classification across third-party apps?

A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
D) Azure AD Conditional Access

Answer: A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection is a comprehensive solution for classifying, labeling, and protecting sensitive data across Microsoft and non-Microsoft applications. One of its standout capabilities is the ability to extend labeling and classification policies to third-party cloud applications. Using integration connectors, Purview can enforce consistent protection rules in platforms like Box, Dropbox, Salesforce, Google Workspace, and other cloud services. Labels applied in Purview remain persistent with the data, ensuring that sensitive information retains its protection even when it is moved, shared, or stored outside the Microsoft ecosystem. This cross-cloud consistency is crucial for organizations that rely on multiple SaaS platforms, as it ensures that compliance and data protection policies are applied universally and not limited to internal systems. Purview’s labeling capabilities allow organizations to categorize data based on sensitivity levels, automatically apply protective actions, and provide visibility into how sensitive content is used across multiple environments.

Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platform that aggregates and analyzes security logs from a variety of sources. It is designed to detect threats, perform correlation analysis, and orchestrate responses to potential security incidents. While Sentinel can monitor activity within cloud applications and provide alerts for suspicious behavior, it does not provide data classification or labeling capabilities. Sentinel is focused on identifying security threats and analyzing telemetry rather than enforcing persistent data protection policies across third-party cloud apps. Organizations relying solely on Sentinel would have strong monitoring and detection but would lack control over the classification and protection of sensitive data stored outside Microsoft services.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud focuses on cloud workload protection and security posture management. It evaluates cloud resources for misconfigurations, vulnerability risks, and compliance with security standards. While Defender for Cloud is essential for securing infrastructure and workloads, it is not designed for data classification or applying labels to content within SaaS applications. Its scope is primarily at the infrastructure and resource level, rather than at the level of individual data objects or files. Consequently, Defender for Cloud cannot ensure that sensitive information in third-party applications is appropriately labeled and protected according to organizational policies.

Azure AD Conditional Access provides identity-based access control, determining whether users can access applications or resources based on compliance policies, device state, location, or risk assessment. Conditional Access is highly effective at securing access to cloud services and protecting against unauthorized sign-ins, but it does not offer mechanisms to classify data or enforce persistent labels. It focuses on controlling who can access information rather than controlling how the information itself is categorized or protected. Without a solution like Purview, Conditional Access cannot ensure consistent data protection across multiple cloud platforms.

Microsoft Purview Information Protection is the correct choice for organizations that require cross-cloud data classification and persistent labeling. Its ability to integrate with third-party applications enables organizations to enforce uniform protection policies across multiple SaaS environments. Administrators can define sensitivity labels that automatically apply encryption, watermarking, or access restrictions based on the data’s classification. These labels remain with the content regardless of where it is stored or shared, providing continuous protection. Purview also includes monitoring and reporting capabilities that give insight into how sensitive information is accessed and shared across third-party applications. This visibility allows security and compliance teams to identify potential policy violations, monitor usage trends, and ensure that regulatory requirements are met.

The service supports automation in labeling, which reduces human error and ensures that sensitive data is classified consistently. It can scan documents, emails, and other files in real-time, applying the appropriate labels based on content analysis or preconfigured rules. By extending classification and protection to third-party cloud services, Purview ensures that organizations maintain a consistent security posture even when employees use non-Microsoft applications for collaboration. Unlike Sentinel, which monitors security events, or Defender for Cloud, which protects workloads, Purview addresses the content-level protection needed to safeguard sensitive data. Conditional Access complements Purview by controlling access to the data, but it cannot enforce labeling or persistent classification independently.

Through its connectors and integration capabilities, Purview creates a comprehensive and unified approach to data protection that spans both Microsoft and third-party ecosystems. Organizations benefit from automated enforcement of security and compliance policies, ensuring that sensitive content is classified, labeled, and protected regardless of where it resides. This persistent, cross-cloud protection is essential for meeting compliance standards, reducing the risk of data breaches, and maintaining visibility over sensitive information in a modern, hybrid work environment. By applying consistent classification and labeling across all cloud platforms, Purview Information Protection empowers organizations to maintain control over their data, safeguard confidential information, and enforce governance policies effectively across a diverse and distributed technology landscape.

Question 118

You want to detect compromised devices and prevent them from accessing corporate resources until remediated. Which solution combines detection and access restriction capabilities?

A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Conditional Access

Explanation:

Defender for Endpoint detects compromised devices. Conditional Access can block or restrict access based on device risk levels. Together they enforce Zero Trust device compliance.

Sentinel only detects anomalies; it does not enforce access.

Purview protects data, not device access.

Defender for Cloud monitors workloads, not endpoints.

The combined solution provides both detection and enforcement.

Question 119

Your organization wants to implement an end-to-end strategy for discovering, classifying, protecting, and monitoring sensitive data across the entire data estate. Which Microsoft product suite provides this capability?

A) Microsoft Purview
B) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
C) Microsoft Sentinel
D) Azure AD Conditional Access

Answer: A) Microsoft Purview

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview provides comprehensive data governance, classification, lineage tracking, protection, and compliance monitoring across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Defender for Cloud secures workloads, not data estates.

Sentinel monitors security logs, not data governance.

Conditional Access manages access decisions, not data classification.

Purview is the unified data governance platform, making it correct.

Question 120

You need visibility into shadow IT usage and want to block unsanctioned cloud applications. Which service provides this capability?

A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Purview
D) Azure AD Conditional Access

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps

Explanation:

Defender for Cloud Apps identifies shadow IT usage, evaluates risk levels of applications, and allows blocking or sanctioning cloud apps.

Sentinel monitors but does not block cloud apps.

Purview governs data but not app usage.

Conditional Access controls access but cannot detect shadow IT.

Cloud Apps is the correct solution for shadow IT discovery and control.