{"id":12957,"date":"2026-09-16T05:36:33","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T05:36:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=12957"},"modified":"2026-09-16T05:36:33","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T05:36:33","slug":"amazon-aws-certified-solutions-architect-associate-saa-c03-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/amazon-aws-certified-solutions-architect-associate-saa-c03-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect &#8211; Associate SAA-C03 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part11 Q201-220"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full\u00a0<\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/aws-certified-solutions-architect-associate-saa-c03-exam-dumps\"><b>Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect \u2013 Associate SAA-C03 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b>\u00a0and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 201<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service provides a managed, highly available file system that can be mounted concurrently by multiple Linux EC2 instances?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EFS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EBS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon S3<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon DynamoDB<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a managed file system that multiple EC2 instances can access concurrently. It is designed for workloads that require shared file storage and can automatically scale storage capacity as files are added or removed. EFS is commonly used for shared application content, home directories, and workloads requiring a standard file system interface. EBS volumes are generally attached to individual instances, S3 provides object storage, and DynamoDB is a NoSQL database. EFS is therefore the appropriate choice for shared Linux file storage.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 202<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to ensure that objects stored in an S3 bucket cannot be deleted or modified for a defined retention period. Which feature should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Versioning<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Object Lock<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Lifecycle<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Transfer Acceleration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Object Lock helps prevent objects from being deleted or overwritten for a defined retention period. It supports compliance and governance requirements where data must remain immutable for a specified amount of time. Object Lock can use retention periods or legal holds to protect objects from modification or deletion. Versioning keeps multiple object versions, Lifecycle automates storage transitions and expiration, and Transfer Acceleration improves transfer performance. S3 Object Lock is therefore the correct choice when the primary requirement is protecting objects from deletion or modification.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 203<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service is designed to provide centralized management of multiple AWS accounts within an organization?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS IAM<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Organizations<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Cognito<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Config<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Organizations allows companies to centrally manage multiple AWS accounts. It provides capabilities such as organizational units, consolidated billing, account grouping, and Service Control Policies (SCPs). Organizations can use these capabilities to establish governance and security controls across accounts while allowing individual accounts to operate independently. IAM manages identities and permissions within AWS environments, Cognito handles application user identities, and Config evaluates resource configurations. AWS Organizations is therefore the appropriate service for centralized multi-account management and governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 204<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An application receives a large number of messages, but its processing component can handle only a limited number at a time. Which SQS feature helps prevent a message from being processed by another consumer while it is being handled?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message retention period<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Long polling<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Visibility timeout<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dead-letter queue<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon SQS visibility timeout temporarily hides a message from other consumers after one consumer receives it. This gives the processing application time to complete its work without another consumer receiving the same message during that period. If processing succeeds, the application deletes the message from the queue. If the timeout expires before deletion, the message can become visible again. Message retention controls how long messages remain available, long polling reduces empty responses, and dead-letter queues handle repeatedly failed messages.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 205<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can distribute HTTP requests to targets based on URL paths, hostnames, or HTTP headers?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network Load Balancer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application Load Balancer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Gateway Load Balancer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Route 53<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An Application Load Balancer (ALB) operates at the application layer and supports advanced request routing based on information such as URL paths, hostnames, HTTP headers, and query parameters. This makes ALB useful for modern web applications and microservices where different requests need to reach different target groups. Network Load Balancer is optimized for high-performance Layer 4 traffic, while Gateway Load Balancer is designed for deploying network virtual appliances. Route 53 provides DNS-based routing. ALB is therefore the appropriate choice for content-based HTTP request routing.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 206<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to reduce the cost of running an EC2 workload that can tolerate interruptions and can restart when capacity becomes unavailable. Which purchasing option should be selected?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On-Demand Instances<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reserved Instances<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Spot Instances<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dedicated Hosts<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EC2 Spot Instances use spare AWS capacity and can provide substantial discounts compared with On-Demand pricing. However, AWS can interrupt Spot Instances when the capacity is needed. They are therefore best suited for fault-tolerant and flexible workloads such as batch processing, distributed workloads, and stateless applications that can tolerate interruptions. On-Demand Instances provide flexible pricing without a long-term commitment, Reserved Instances can reduce costs for predictable usage, and Dedicated Hosts provide dedicated physical server control. Spot Instances are the best choice for interruptible workloads.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 207<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Route 53 routing policy directs users to the AWS Region that provides the lowest network latency?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Geolocation routing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weighted routing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Latency-based routing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Failover routing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Route 53 latency-based routing directs DNS queries to resources in the Region that provides the lowest network latency from the user&#8217;s location. This is useful for globally distributed applications where performance can improve by directing users to a geographically appropriate AWS Region. Geolocation routing makes decisions based on the user&#8217;s geographic location, weighted routing distributes traffic according to configured weights, and failover routing uses primary and secondary endpoints. Latency-based routing is therefore the correct choice when minimizing network latency is the primary objective.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 208<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to run containers without managing EC2 servers or the underlying container infrastructure. Which option should it choose?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ECS with EC2 capacity only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EC2 Instance Store<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EKS with self-managed nodes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate allows organizations to run containers without provisioning or managing EC2 instances. Fargate provides serverless compute for containers and handles the underlying infrastructure required to run ECS tasks. This allows teams to focus on containerized applications rather than server management. ECS with EC2 requires customers to manage the underlying instances, while self-managed EKS nodes also require infrastructure administration. Therefore, ECS with Fargate is the most appropriate choice when the goal is to run containers without managing servers.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 209<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service provides a managed data warehouse optimized for large-scale analytical queries?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon DynamoDB<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Redshift<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon RDS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ElastiCache<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Redshift is a managed cloud data warehouse designed for large-scale analytical workloads. It can process complex queries across large datasets and is commonly used for business intelligence, reporting, and analytics. Redshift uses columnar storage and parallel processing capabilities to efficiently handle analytical workloads. DynamoDB is designed for NoSQL transactional workloads, RDS provides managed relational databases, and ElastiCache provides in-memory caching. Amazon Redshift is therefore the appropriate service when an organization requires a managed data warehouse for large-scale analytical queries.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 210<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service records API calls made through the AWS Management Console, SDKs, command-line tools, and AWS services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Config<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon CloudWatch<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudTrail<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Trusted Advisor<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudTrail records API activity within an AWS environment, including actions performed through the AWS Management Console, SDKs, command-line tools, and supported AWS services. CloudTrail logs can help organizations investigate security incidents, monitor account activity, and maintain an audit trail of changes. AWS Config focuses on resource configuration history and compliance, CloudWatch provides monitoring and logging, and Trusted Advisor provides recommendations. CloudTrail is therefore the appropriate service when an organization needs a record of API calls and account activity.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 211<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which VPC component controls inbound and outbound traffic at the subnet level and is stateless?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security group<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network ACL<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">IAM policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Route table<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Network Access Control List (NACL) operates at the subnet level and controls inbound and outbound traffic using ordered rules. NACLs are stateless, meaning response traffic must be explicitly allowed by the appropriate rule. Security groups operate at the instance or network-interface level and are stateful, so return traffic is automatically permitted for allowed connections. IAM policies control AWS API permissions, while route tables determine where network traffic is directed. A NACL is therefore the correct choice when subnet-level, stateless network traffic control is required.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 212<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to create a private connection from a VPC to an AWS service without using a public IP address. Which VPC feature should be considered for supported services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VPC endpoint<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Internet Gateway<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NAT Gateway<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Elastic IP address<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VPC endpoints allow resources inside a VPC to access supported AWS services privately without requiring public IP addresses or routing traffic through the public internet. Gateway endpoints support services such as S3 and DynamoDB, while interface endpoints use AWS PrivateLink to provide private connectivity to supported services. Internet Gateways provide internet connectivity, NAT Gateways allow private resources to initiate outbound internet connections, and Elastic IP addresses provide public IPv4 addresses. A VPC endpoint is therefore the appropriate feature for private access to supported AWS services.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 213<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service provides recommendations that can help identify opportunities related to cost, performance, security, and fault tolerance?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Trusted Advisor<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon GuardDuty<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudTrail<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Trusted Advisor analyzes an AWS environment and provides recommendations across areas such as cost optimization, performance, security, fault tolerance, and service limits. These recommendations can help organizations identify opportunities to improve their AWS architecture and resource usage. GuardDuty focuses on threat detection, CloudTrail records API activity, and Inspector helps identify software vulnerabilities. Trusted Advisor is therefore the appropriate service when a company wants AWS recommendations covering multiple operational and architectural areas.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 214<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service provides centralized authentication and authorization for workforce users accessing multiple AWS accounts and applications?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Cognito<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">IAM Identity Center<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon GuardDuty<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS KMS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">IAM Identity Center provides centralized workforce access management across multiple AWS accounts and supported applications. It can integrate with an organization&#8217;s existing identity provider and allows administrators to assign users or groups appropriate permissions across accounts. This simplifies workforce authentication and reduces the need to manage separate IAM users in every AWS account. Cognito is primarily designed for application end users, GuardDuty provides threat detection, and KMS manages encryption keys. IAM Identity Center is therefore the appropriate solution for centralized workforce access.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 215<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can orchestrate multiple serverless tasks in a defined workflow with sequencing, retries, and error handling?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon SQS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EventBridge<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Step Functions<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon SNS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Step Functions provides workflow orchestration for distributed applications and serverless workloads. It allows developers to define sequences of tasks and includes capabilities such as branching, retries, error handling, waiting, and parallel execution. Step Functions can coordinate services such as Lambda, ECS, and other AWS components. SQS provides message queuing, EventBridge routes events, and SNS distributes notifications. Step Functions is therefore the best choice when an application requires coordinated multi-step workflows with explicit execution logic and failure handling.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 216<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs to store frequently accessed objects in Amazon S3 while automatically moving objects between access tiers based on changing access patterns. Which storage class is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Standard<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Glacier Deep Archive<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Intelligent-Tiering<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Standard-IA<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 Intelligent-Tiering is designed for data with changing or unpredictable access patterns. It automatically moves objects between access tiers based on observed access patterns, helping reduce storage costs without requiring the organization to manually predict when objects will become infrequently accessed. S3 Standard is intended for frequently accessed data, Standard-IA is designed for less frequently accessed data, and Glacier Deep Archive is intended for long-term archival. Intelligent-Tiering is therefore appropriate when access patterns are uncertain or change over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 217<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can automatically detect software vulnerabilities and unintended network exposure in supported workloads?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Macie<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon GuardDuty<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS WAF<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector is a vulnerability management service that can assess supported AWS workloads for software vulnerabilities and unintended network exposure. It can help organizations identify security weaknesses in resources such as EC2 instances and container images. Macie focuses on discovering and protecting sensitive data in S3, GuardDuty detects suspicious activity and threats, and WAF filters web requests. Amazon Inspector is therefore the most appropriate service when the objective is identifying vulnerabilities in supported workloads and improving their security posture.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 218<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company requires a shared file system that supports the SMB protocol and integrates with Microsoft Windows workloads. Which AWS service should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EFS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon FSx for Windows File Server<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon S3<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EBS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon FSx for Windows File Server provides a fully managed Windows file system that supports the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol. It is designed for Windows-based applications that require shared file storage and can integrate with Microsoft Active Directory. EFS is primarily designed for Linux-based workloads using NFS, S3 provides object storage, and EBS provides block storage for individual instances. FSx for Windows File Server is therefore the appropriate solution for applications requiring shared SMB-compatible storage in AWS.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 219<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can provide static, globally reachable IP addresses and improve application availability by routing traffic over the AWS global network?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Route 53<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Global Accelerator<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon CloudFront<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Transit Gateway<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Global Accelerator provides static anycast IP addresses that act as fixed entry points for applications running in AWS or supported environments. It uses the AWS global network to route user traffic toward healthy application endpoints and can improve availability and performance. Route 53 provides DNS services, CloudFront is primarily a content delivery network, and Transit Gateway connects VPCs and other networks. Global Accelerator is therefore the appropriate choice when applications require static global IP addresses and network-level traffic optimization.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 220<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs to automatically trigger a Lambda function whenever a new object is uploaded to an S3 bucket. Which architecture is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 event notification invoking Lambda<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CloudTrail invoking Lambda for every object<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Route 53 invoking Lambda<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EBS snapshot invoking Lambda<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon S3 event notifications can automatically invoke a Lambda function when specified events occur, such as object creation. This creates an event-driven architecture where processing begins immediately after a new object is uploaded. For example, a Lambda function could process an uploaded image, validate a document, or transform a data file. CloudTrail records API activity rather than serving as the primary object-event trigger, while Route 53 and EBS have unrelated purposes. S3 event notifications with Lambda are therefore the appropriate solution for this requirement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full\u00a0Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect \u2013 Associate SAA-C03 Exam Dumps\u00a0and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 201 Which AWS service provides a managed, highly available file system that can be mounted concurrently by multiple Linux EC2 instances? Amazon EFS Amazon EBS Amazon S3 Amazon DynamoDB Correct Answer: 1 Explanation Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12957"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12957"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12979,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12957\/revisions\/12979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}