{"id":13644,"date":"2026-09-16T10:19:04","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T10:19:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=13644"},"modified":"2026-09-16T10:19:04","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T10:19:04","slug":"cisco-ccde-400-007-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part4-q61-80","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccde-400-007-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part4-q61-80\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCDE 400-007 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part4 Q61-80"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>Cisco CCDE 400-007 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 61:<\/b><\/h3>\n

A large enterprise is designing a new WAN and needs to prioritize business-critical applications while allowing less-important traffic to use remaining bandwidth. Which design approach is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Treat all traffic identically<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Reserve all bandwidth for bulk applications<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Use application classification and appropriate QoS policies<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Disable congestion management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Application classification allows the network to identify different traffic types and apply treatment according to business requirements. Business-critical applications can receive appropriate priority or bandwidth guarantees, while less-sensitive traffic can use remaining capacity. The exact QoS mechanisms depend on link characteristics and application behavior, but classification, marking, queuing, and scheduling are common design components. Treating every application identically may allow large transfers to negatively affect latency-sensitive services. Reserving all bandwidth for bulk applications would create the opposite problem, and disabling congestion management removes useful controls during periods of contention. QoS should therefore be designed from measurable application requirements and expected traffic patterns.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 62:<\/b><\/h3>\n

    An enterprise wants to prevent a failure in one data center from causing unnecessary routing instability in another data center. Which design principle should be applied?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Extend all Layer 2 domains between data centers<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Use routing boundaries and controlled route propagation<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Create unrestricted routing adjacencies<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Advertise every internal prefix globally<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Routing boundaries can limit the propagation of topology information and reduce the effect of local failures on remote portions of the network. Controlled route propagation, filtering, and summarization can help ensure that only necessary information crosses architectural boundaries. Extending Layer 2 between data centers can create larger failure domains and additional dependencies. Unrestricted routing adjacencies and global advertisement of every internal prefix increase the amount of information exposed to remote domains. A hierarchical architecture therefore provides better fault containment and operational control. The design should also define how routes are withdrawn or changed during failures so that convergence remains predictable.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 63:<\/b><\/h3>\n

      A company needs separate routing domains for production and development environments while allowing both environments to share physical switching infrastructure. Which technology is suitable?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. VRF<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. NAT only<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. DNS delegation<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. STP tuning only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        VRFs provide separate logical routing tables on shared network infrastructure. Production and development traffic can therefore maintain independent routing domains while using common physical devices. Appropriate route leaking or controlled inter-VRF connectivity can be introduced when specific communication is required. NAT alone does not provide complete routing-domain separation, while DNS delegation only affects name resolution. STP controls Layer 2 topology but does not create independent Layer 3 routing tables. The architecture should combine VRFs with security policies and appropriate route import\/export controls to ensure that the intended separation is maintained throughout the network.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 64:<\/b><\/h3>\n

        A company wants to improve availability between two sites. Both WAN circuits currently use the same physical provider path. What should the architect investigate?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Increasing DNS TTL<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Changing router hostnames<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Adding more VLANs over the same circuit<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Obtaining physically diverse connectivity where practical<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Two logical circuits do not necessarily provide true redundancy if they share a common physical failure point. A fiber cut, conduit failure, provider device failure, or shared facility issue could affect both connections simultaneously. Physical diversity attempts to ensure that independent paths remain available during a single infrastructure failure. Additional VLANs do not create physical redundancy, and DNS settings do not address circuit availability. Router hostname changes are unrelated to resiliency. The architect should map the complete physical and logical paths, identify common failure points, and work with providers to establish meaningful diversity where the availability requirements justify the additional cost.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 65:<\/b><\/h3>\n

          A network has frequent congestion on an Internet-facing link. The architect needs to determine whether the link should be upgraded. What should be analyzed first?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Interface utilization, traffic patterns, growth, and application requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Router chassis color<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Number of configured hostnames<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. Switch rack position<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Capacity planning should be based on actual measurements and expected demand. Interface utilization trends, traffic composition, peak periods, application requirements, and projected growth help determine whether additional bandwidth is necessary. The architect should also investigate whether congestion is caused by a particular traffic class or inefficient routing rather than simply assuming that a larger circuit is required. Hardware appearance, naming conventions, and rack position do not provide useful capacity information. Historical telemetry combined with growth forecasts allows the organization to make a more defensible capacity decision and avoid both premature upgrades and insufficient capacity.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 66:<\/b><\/h3>\n

            A company has multiple Internet connections and wants inbound traffic to reach its services through selected providers under normal conditions. Which design capability provides control over inbound route selection?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Local preference alone<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Inbound routing policy and appropriate BGP attributes<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. DHCP reservations<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. STP root placement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Inbound traffic selection is influenced by how an organization advertises its prefixes and by attributes used by external networks when selecting paths. BGP policy can influence inbound behavior through mechanisms such as AS-path manipulation and other appropriate attributes, although the organization cannot directly control another network’s complete routing decision. Local preference primarily influences outbound path selection within an autonomous system. DHCP reservations affect address assignment, while STP controls Layer 2 topology. The architect should therefore carefully design BGP advertisements, filtering, path attributes, and provider relationships while recognizing that inbound routing remains partly dependent on external networks.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 67:<\/b><\/h3>\n

              A business requires predictable recovery after a WAN failure. Which metric should be explicitly defined during architecture planning?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Recovery time objective for network connectivity<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. Number of switch ports per floor<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Maximum cable length only<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. Device serial number format<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                A recovery time objective establishes how quickly connectivity or a service must be restored after a failure. This requirement can then guide decisions about redundancy, failure detection, routing convergence, backup paths, and operational procedures. Without a measurable recovery objective, it is difficult to determine whether a proposed architecture provides sufficient resiliency. Switch-port counts, cable lengths, and serial-number formats may matter for implementation but do not define the required recovery behavior. The architect should also identify acceptable packet loss, recovery point considerations where relevant, and the specific failure scenarios that the network must survive.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 68:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                A network uses multiple routing protocols and requires routes to be exchanged between them. Which design concern is particularly important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Avoiding all route filtering<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Advertising every route in both directions<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Controlling redistribution to prevent loops and unintended reachability<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Disabling route metrics<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Redistribution between routing protocols should be carefully controlled because each protocol may have different metrics, administrative behavior, and route-selection characteristics. Uncontrolled redistribution can introduce routing loops, suboptimal paths, duplicate routes, or unintended reachability. The architect should define which prefixes are exchanged, apply filtering, set appropriate attributes or metrics, and consider how routes can return to their originating domain. Advertising every route in both directions is generally unnecessary and increases complexity. A deliberate redistribution policy provides predictable behavior and reduces the risk of control-plane problems when multiple routing domains interact.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 69:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  An organization is designing a campus network with thousands of endpoints. Which architecture generally provides better fault isolation and scalability?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. One large Layer 2 domain<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Layer 3 boundaries between hierarchical campus blocks<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. A single VLAN for all users<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Full Layer 2 extension across the campus<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Hierarchical campus architectures with Layer 3 boundaries can reduce broadcast-domain size and limit the impact of Layer 2 failures. Access, distribution, and core functions can be designed with appropriate routing boundaries, allowing the network to scale while maintaining predictable operational domains. A single large VLAN increases the size of the failure and broadcast domain and can make troubleshooting more difficult. Full Layer 2 extension across the campus creates similar scaling concerns. The exact architecture depends on application and operational requirements, but introducing deliberate Layer 3 boundaries is an important technique for large campus environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 70:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    A company is designing connectivity for a latency-sensitive application between two geographic locations. Which information should be included in the design requirements?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Expected latency, jitter, packet loss, bandwidth, and availability<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Only the number of routers<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Only the physical cable color<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Only the current IP address of the application server<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Latency-sensitive applications require measurable network performance requirements. Latency, jitter, packet loss, available bandwidth, and availability targets can influence WAN technology, path selection, QoS, redundancy, and capacity planning. Merely counting routers does not describe end-to-end application performance. Cable color has no architectural significance, and a single current IP address does not capture the application’s connectivity requirements. The architect should define performance requirements under both normal and failure conditions and determine whether the network can consistently meet them. These requirements then become criteria for evaluating potential WAN architectures and service providers.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 71:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      A company wants to minimize unnecessary traffic across an expensive WAN link. Which architectural technique can help?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Place every application in the remote data center<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Use local services or traffic optimization where business requirements permit<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Force all branch traffic through headquarters<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Disable local Internet access for all users<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Localizing appropriate services or using traffic-optimization mechanisms can reduce unnecessary WAN consumption. For example, locally available services, caching, distributed application components, or direct Internet access may reduce traffic that otherwise has to traverse expensive links, provided security and business requirements allow them. Forcing all traffic through headquarters can increase bandwidth consumption and latency. Disabling local Internet access may create operational disadvantages and does not necessarily solve application traffic inefficiency. The architect should first identify traffic patterns and application dependencies, then determine which flows truly need to cross the WAN and which can be handled closer to users.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 72:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        An organization wants to provide secure remote access while maintaining separate access policies for employees, contractors, and administrators. Which design principle is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Use one unrestricted remote-access policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. Place every remote user into the management network<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. Use identity-based segmentation and role-specific access controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. Allow remote users to bypass security inspection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Identity-based segmentation allows access policies to reflect the role and trust level of the user. Employees, contractors, and administrators may require different resources and privileges, so a single unrestricted policy can expose unnecessary services. Administrators generally require carefully controlled access to management systems rather than being placed into a broad management network without additional restrictions. Security inspection and authentication controls should remain part of the architecture. Role-specific policies can limit access to only required applications and networks, improving separation while supporting legitimate business workflows. The design should also consider authentication, authorization, logging, and session security.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 73:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          A company operates several critical services and wants to eliminate single points of failure. Which statement best describes a sound redundancy strategy?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Duplicate only the access switches<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Provide redundancy across relevant devices, links, and failure domains<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Use two logical links through one physical device<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Duplicate hardware without considering shared dependencies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Effective redundancy must consider the complete failure domain rather than simply adding duplicate devices. If two links terminate on the same device, a device failure can still interrupt both paths. Likewise, redundant devices connected through the same power source, provider circuit, or physical conduit may share common failure points. The architect should identify relevant failure scenarios and provide independent paths where justified by availability requirements. Simply duplicating hardware without examining dependencies may create the appearance of redundancy without meaningful resilience. Redundancy should therefore be designed systematically across devices, links, power, providers, and geographic locations as appropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 74:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            A network team wants to introduce a new routing architecture but is concerned about unexpected behavior during migration. Which approach reduces implementation risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Make the change everywhere simultaneously<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Avoid documenting the migration<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Use a phased migration with testing, monitoring, and rollback procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Disable all routing protocols during the migration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A phased migration allows the architecture to be introduced gradually while validating expected behavior. Pilot locations or controlled segments can be migrated first, followed by monitoring of routing, traffic, security, and application performance. Rollback procedures provide a defined recovery path if unexpected behavior occurs. A simultaneous enterprise-wide change increases the potential blast radius of an implementation problem. Lack of documentation makes recovery and coordination more difficult. Disabling routing protocols would create unnecessary disruption. Migration planning should therefore include sequencing, dependencies, validation criteria, communication, monitoring, and rollback steps.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 75:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              A service provider needs to support multicast applications across a routed network. Which design consideration is important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Multicast forwarding and control-plane requirements must be supported end-to-end<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Multicast can always be treated exactly like ordinary unicast traffic<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. DNS configuration alone provides multicast forwarding<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. STP determines Layer 3 multicast routing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Multicast requires specific control-plane and forwarding behavior throughout the path. The architecture must consider how receivers join groups, how multicast distribution trees are established, how routing information is exchanged, and how multicast traffic is forwarded across the network. The exact protocols and architecture depend on the environment and application requirements. DNS does not provide multicast forwarding, and STP is primarily a Layer 2 loop-prevention mechanism rather than a multicast routing protocol. Treating multicast exactly like unicast can overlook important control-plane and forwarding requirements. End-to-end validation is especially important for multicast applications.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 76:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                A company wants to ensure that management traffic cannot be affected by ordinary user traffic during congestion. Which design approach is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Put management and user traffic into one unrestricted queue<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Apply appropriate segmentation and QoS treatment to management traffic<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Disable management access during congestion<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Give all traffic identical treatment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Management traffic can be protected through both segmentation and appropriate QoS policies. Separating management networks or using dedicated logical security domains reduces exposure to ordinary user traffic, while QoS can provide appropriate treatment when links become congested. The precise priority depends on the organization’s requirements and security model. Putting all traffic into one unrestricted queue does not provide isolation. Disabling management access during congestion can make troubleshooting more difficult precisely when administrators need access. Treating all traffic identically also ignores the different operational importance of management and user flows. The design should protect management access without creating unnecessary priority conflicts.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 77:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  A network architect is designing an enterprise Internet edge. Which component should be considered when defining the security architecture?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Only internal DNS servers<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Only switch port speed<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Traffic filtering, routing policy, threat controls, and failure behavior<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Only endpoint screen resolution<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    The Internet edge is a critical security and routing boundary. The architecture should define how traffic is filtered, how routes are exchanged, how unwanted prefixes or traffic are controlled, and how security devices behave during failures. Depending on requirements, this may include firewalls, DDoS protection, intrusion prevention, route filtering, BGP policy, and redundant connectivity. Focusing only on DNS or switch speed does not address the full security and resiliency model. Failure behavior is also important because a security control can become a single point of failure if redundancy and recovery are not properly designed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 78:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    An enterprise has applications distributed across multiple cloud providers and its own data centers. Which architectural concern becomes especially important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Consistent routing, security, identity, and operational policies across environments<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Using unrelated addressing plans in every environment<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Removing centralized monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Creating independent policies with no interoperability requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Multi-cloud and hybrid architectures increase the importance of consistent connectivity and operational controls. Routing, addressing, security policies, identity integration, monitoring, and application dependencies must be understood across cloud and on-premises environments. Completely unrelated addressing and security models can increase operational complexity and make troubleshooting difficult. Removing centralized monitoring reduces visibility into end-to-end service behavior. Independent policies may be necessary in some environments, but they should still be designed to interoperate where applications require cross-environment communication. The architect should define clear boundaries while maintaining consistent principles for connectivity, security, visibility, and lifecycle management.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 79:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      A company wants to reduce operational errors when deploying network changes. Which design practice can help?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Rely entirely on undocumented manual procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Standardize designs and use automated validation where practical<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Allow every engineer to use a different configuration model<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Disable pre-change testing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Standardized designs and automated validation can reduce configuration inconsistencies and catch errors before changes affect production. Templates, documented standards, configuration checks, and staged deployments provide repeatable processes. Automation should be combined with appropriate testing and approval mechanisms rather than simply applying changes without validation. Undocumented manual procedures depend heavily on individual knowledge and increase variation. Allowing every engineer to use a different configuration model makes operations and troubleshooting more difficult. Disabling testing removes an important opportunity to detect problems before deployment. The overall objective is to make network changes predictable, repeatable, observable, and reversible.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 80:<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        A business is evaluating two network architectures that both meet current requirements, but one is easier to expand as traffic and site counts increase. Which information should be included in the architecture decision?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Only current purchase cost<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. Only the number of physical interfaces<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Only current bandwidth utilization<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. Current requirements plus projected growth, scalability, operational impact, and lifecycle cost<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Architecture decisions should account for both current needs and expected future conditions. A design that satisfies today’s requirements may become expensive or difficult to operate as the number of sites, users, applications, or traffic volumes increase. The architect should therefore consider scalability, addressing, routing-table growth, capacity, automation, operational complexity, migration requirements, and lifecycle costs. Current purchase price is only one component of the overall decision. Physical interface count and current utilization also provide useful information but do not capture future requirements. Evaluating projected growth helps ensure that the selected architecture remains viable without requiring unnecessary redesign or disruptive expansion.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                          <\/h1>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Cisco CCDE 400-007 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 61: A large enterprise is designing a new WAN and needs to prioritize business-critical applications while allowing less-important traffic to use remaining bandwidth. Which design approach is most appropriate? Treat all traffic identically Reserve all bandwidth for bulk applications Use application classification […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13644"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13644"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13644\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13696,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13644\/revisions\/13696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13644"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13644"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13644"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}