{"id":14779,"date":"2026-09-17T07:20:12","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T07:20:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=14779"},"modified":"2026-09-17T07:20:12","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T07:20:12","slug":"cisco-ccnp-300-415-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-300-415-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP 300-415 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part11 Q201-220"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><\/h1>\n<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/300-415-exam-dumps\"><b>Cisco CCNP 300-415 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 201<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP packet type is used to acknowledge receipt of reliable EIGRP packets?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hello<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Query<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Acknowledgment<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reply<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EIGRP uses acknowledgment information to provide reliable delivery for certain EIGRP packets. An acknowledgment is essentially an EIGRP Hello packet that contains no routing information and is used to confirm receipt of a reliable packet. Reliable EIGRP communication is important for packets such as Updates, Queries, and Replies. EIGRP uses sequence numbers to associate acknowledgments with transmitted information. If an expected acknowledgment is not received, the sender can retransmit the packet. This reliable transport mechanism allows EIGRP to exchange routing information efficiently without periodically sending complete routing tables. Understanding acknowledgments is useful when troubleshooting packet retransmissions and EIGRP neighbor communication.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 202<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP attribute is normally preferred when comparing two routes if one has a higher value?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MED<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local Preference<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Origin<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS Path<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local Preference is normally preferred when it has a higher value. It is an internal BGP attribute designed to influence which external path routers within the same autonomous system should use for outbound traffic. Because Local Preference is carried through iBGP, an organization can establish a consistent exit policy across multiple routers. For example, a network may assign a higher Local Preference to routes received from its preferred Internet provider and a lower value to routes received from a secondary provider. Cisco&#8217;s Weight attribute is evaluated before Local Preference, so Weight can override this choice on an individual router. Local Preference is therefore an important tool for autonomous-system-wide outbound traffic engineering.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 203<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which OSPF LSA type is used to advertise routes between different OSPF areas?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 3<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 5<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 1<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 2<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 3 OSPF LSAs, known as Summary LSAs, are generated by Area Border Routers to advertise networks from one OSPF area into another. They allow routers in different areas to learn about inter-area destinations while keeping the detailed topology information of each area separate. Type 1 Router LSAs describe routers within an area, while Type 2 Network LSAs describe multiaccess networks. Type 5 LSAs carry external routes redistributed into OSPF. Type 3 LSAs are therefore central to multi-area OSPF operation because they provide the information needed for inter-area route calculation and communication.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 204<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP command displays the IP addresses of EIGRP neighbors and their adjacency information?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip eigrp topology<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip eigrp interfaces<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip eigrp neighbors<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip route eigrp<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The show ip eigrp neighbors command displays information about EIGRP neighbor relationships. The output commonly includes the neighbor&#8217;s address, hold time, uptime, interface, and sequence information. It is one of the first commands administrators use when troubleshooting EIGRP adjacency problems. If an expected neighbor does not appear, possible causes include mismatched autonomous-system numbers, incompatible K-values, passive interfaces, ACL filtering, or network connectivity issues. The topology command focuses on learned routes and path information, while the interfaces command provides information about EIGRP-enabled interfaces. Checking the neighbor table confirms whether the router has successfully established an EIGRP relationship with another router.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 205<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP attribute is used to influence inbound traffic by advertising different MED values to an external autonomous system?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weight<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local Preference<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MED<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Origin<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MED, or Multi-Exit Discriminator, can be used to influence how an external autonomous system chooses between multiple links toward the same originating autonomous system. A lower MED value is generally preferred when the relevant BGP comparison is performed. An organization with multiple connections to another autonomous system can advertise different MED values to suggest which entry point should be preferred. MED is not a guaranteed command for controlling inbound traffic because the receiving autonomous system can apply its own policies. It is therefore a signaling mechanism for path preference rather than an absolute routing instruction. Understanding this distinction is important when designing BGP traffic-engineering policies.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 206<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which OSPF neighbor state follows the Init state after bidirectional communication has been established?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Full<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2-Way<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Loading<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Exchange<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The OSPF 2-Way state indicates that bidirectional communication has been established between two neighbors. A router reaches this state after it sees its own Router ID in the neighbor&#8217;s Hello packet. On broadcast and other multiaccess networks, 2-Way is an important normal state between routers that are not the DR or BDR. Those routers generally form full adjacencies with the DR and BDR rather than with every other router. On point-to-point links, neighbors normally continue toward Full. If a router remains in Init, the neighbor&#8217;s Hello packets are being received but bidirectional communication has not yet been confirmed.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 207<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP route is selected as the primary path to a destination?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Feasible successor<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Successor<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reported distance<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Query<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The EIGRP successor is the primary route selected by EIGRP for reaching a destination. Its metric is the feasible distance, which represents the best known metric from the local router to that destination. EIGRP may also maintain one or more feasible successors as alternate loop-free paths when they satisfy the feasibility condition. If the successor fails, a feasible successor can be promoted without requiring a full recomputation through the network. This contributes to EIGRP&#8217;s rapid convergence. The distinction between successor and feasible successor is important when analyzing the EIGRP topology table and understanding how the protocol responds to a routing failure.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 208<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP command provides a concise summary of BGP neighbors and their current session state?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip bgp summary<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip bgp neighbors<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip route bgp<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip protocols<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The show ip bgp summary command provides a concise overview of BGP neighbor relationships. Its output commonly includes the BGP router ID, local autonomous system, neighbor addresses, remote AS numbers, message counters, uptime, current state, and the number of prefixes received. It is one of the most useful first commands when checking whether BGP sessions are operational. The show ip bgp neighbors command provides much more detailed information about individual peers, including capabilities and policy-related details. If the summary shows a neighbor in Established state with received prefixes, the BGP session is generally functioning and exchanging routing information.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 209<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which OSPF LSA type is used by an ASBR to advertise an external route into the OSPF domain?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 2<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 4<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 5<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 3<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Type 5 AS External LSA is used to advertise external routes into an OSPF autonomous system. These routes are normally introduced by an Autonomous System Boundary Router through redistribution from another routing source, such as static routing, BGP, or another IGP. Type 5 LSAs are flooded throughout areas that permit external LSAs. Standard stub areas block Type 5 LSAs, while NSSA areas use Type 7 LSAs for their locally introduced external routes. Type 4 LSAs provide information about reaching an ASBR located in another area. Understanding Type 5 behavior is especially important when troubleshooting route redistribution and external route visibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 210<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP feature can reduce the scope of queries in a hub-and-spoke topology?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EIGRP stub routing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Variance<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Split horizon<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Feasible distance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EIGRP stub routing can significantly reduce the scope of EIGRP queries in hub-and-spoke networks. A stub router identifies itself as a limited routing participant and can advertise only selected route types to its neighbors. This prevents other routers from unnecessarily treating the stub router as a transit path for destinations it does not provide. By limiting the possible sources of routing information, EIGRP can reduce query propagation and improve convergence behavior. This feature is especially useful for branch routers connected to a central hub. EIGRP stub routing should be configured carefully because the router&#8217;s advertised route types determine what information the hub can learn from the stub.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 211<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP message is exchanged immediately after the TCP connection is established to negotiate BGP session parameters?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Update<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Keepalive<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Open<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The BGP Open message is exchanged after the TCP session is established. It is used by BGP peers to negotiate important session parameters, including the BGP version, autonomous system number, Hold Time, and BGP Identifier. After successful Open message processing, the peers exchange Keepalive messages to confirm the session and maintain it. Once the session reaches Established state, Update messages can be exchanged to advertise and withdraw routing information. If a serious protocol error occurs, a Notification message may be sent. Understanding this sequence is helpful when diagnosing BGP sessions that fail during the initial negotiation process.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 212<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which OSPF LSA type is used in an NSSA to represent an external route?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 7<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 5<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 3<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 4<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Type 7 LSAs are used in an OSPF Not-So-Stubby Area to represent external routes introduced by an ASBR inside the NSSA. Standard Type 5 external LSAs are not allowed to enter an NSSA from outside. Instead, an ASBR within the NSSA can advertise redistributed routes using Type 7 LSAs. An appropriate ABR can translate Type 7 information into Type 5 when the external route needs to be advertised into other OSPF areas. This design allows an NSSA to retain stub-area characteristics while still permitting controlled external route redistribution. Type 7 behavior is therefore an important distinction between NSSA and standard stub areas.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 213<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP metric component is cumulative across all links in a route?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bandwidth<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Delay<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Load<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reliability<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EIGRP accumulates interface delay values across the complete path to a destination. The total delay is therefore the sum of the configured delays on the interfaces along the route. Bandwidth is different because EIGRP uses the minimum bandwidth found along the path rather than adding bandwidth values together. By default, EIGRP&#8217;s composite metric uses bandwidth and delay as its primary active components. Load and reliability are not normally included unless the K-values are changed. Understanding cumulative delay is important when comparing two EIGRP paths because a route containing several interfaces with higher delay may receive a worse metric even when its minimum bandwidth is acceptable.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 214<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP attribute helps prevent routing loops by recording the autonomous systems a route has traversed?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MED<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local Preference<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS Path<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weight<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The AS Path attribute provides BGP with information about the autonomous systems through which a route has passed. When an eBGP router advertises a route, its autonomous system number is normally added to the AS Path. If a router receives a route containing its own AS number, it can identify the advertisement as a potential routing loop and reject it. AS Path also participates in BGP best-path selection, where a shorter path is generally preferred after higher-priority attributes have been considered. This makes AS Path both a loop-prevention mechanism and an important path-selection attribute. AS-path prepending can also be used to influence external path selection.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 215<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which OSPF command displays OSPF routes installed in the IP routing table?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip ospf database<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip route ospf<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip ospf neighbor<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">show ip ospf<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The show ip route ospf command displays routes in the routing table that were learned through OSPF. It can show intra-area, inter-area, and external OSPF routes, depending on the network configuration. Route codes and administrative distance values help identify the type of OSPF route being installed. This command differs from show ip ospf database, which displays LSAs rather than only the routes selected for forwarding. If an expected OSPF route is missing, administrators can compare the routing table with the LSDB and neighbor state to determine whether the problem is related to route calculation, LSA availability, or adjacency formation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 216<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP administrative distance is assigned by default to external EIGRP routes?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">90<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">110<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">170<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">120<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">External EIGRP routes have a default administrative distance of 170 on Cisco routers. These routes originate from another routing source and enter EIGRP through redistribution. Internal EIGRP routes, by comparison, have a default administrative distance of 90. Administrative distance is used when a router receives multiple routes to the same destination from different routing sources. The lower administrative distance is generally preferred. Therefore, an internal EIGRP route can normally be preferred over an external EIGRP route when both provide equivalent reachability to a destination. Knowing the different EIGRP administrative distances is important in environments using redistribution and multiple routing protocols.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 217<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP attribute is locally significant and is not advertised to BGP peers?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weight<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local Preference<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MED<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Origin<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weight is a Cisco-specific BGP attribute that has local significance to the router where it is configured. It is not advertised to BGP peers. A higher Weight value is preferred when selecting among BGP paths. This makes Weight useful when an administrator wants to influence the route selected by a particular router without affecting other routers in the autonomous system. Local Preference is different because it is carried through iBGP and can influence outbound path selection throughout an autonomous system. Because Weight is evaluated before Local Preference in Cisco&#8217;s BGP decision process, it can have a strong effect on local path selection.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 218<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which OSPF process calculates the shortest-path tree from the information in the link-state database?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DUAL<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">SPF<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">BGP decision process<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Split horizon<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OSPF uses the Shortest Path First algorithm to calculate the shortest-path tree from the information contained in the link-state database. The algorithm is based on Dijkstra&#8217;s shortest-path calculation. Each OSPF router independently maintains an LSDB for its area and uses that information to calculate the best paths toward destinations. When significant topology changes occur, OSPF may run SPF again to update its routing information. DUAL is associated with EIGRP rather than OSPF. Understanding SPF is important when analyzing OSPF convergence, route calculations, and the effect of link-state changes on the routing table.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 219<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which EIGRP mechanism allows multiple paths with different metrics to be installed for load balancing?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Split horizon<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Route summarization<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Variance<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stub routing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EIGRP variance allows the routing process to consider multiple unequal-cost paths for load balancing. Normally, EIGRP uses equal-cost paths for load sharing, but variance can expand the acceptable metric range for alternate paths. An alternate path must still satisfy the feasibility condition before it can be used as a feasible path. The variance multiplier is applied to the best-path metric to determine the maximum acceptable metric for additional paths. This feature can improve utilization when links have different bandwidths or delays. However, simply configuring a higher variance does not guarantee that every alternate route will be installed because the feasibility requirement still applies.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 220<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which BGP attribute is normally preferred when its AS Path is shorter, assuming higher-priority attributes are equal?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">MED<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Origin<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS Path<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local Preference<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<h3><b>Explanation<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The AS Path attribute is generally preferred when it contains fewer autonomous system hops, assuming the higher-priority BGP attributes are equal. A shorter AS Path is normally considered a more direct route through the autonomous-system topology. However, BGP does not simply choose the shortest AS Path in every situation because attributes such as Weight and Local Preference are evaluated earlier in Cisco&#8217;s best-path process. Organizations can also manipulate AS Path through prepending to influence how external networks view a route. Therefore, AS Path length is an important factor but should always be considered within the complete BGP decision process rather than as an isolated rule.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Cisco CCNP 300-415 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 201 Which EIGRP packet type is used to acknowledge receipt of reliable EIGRP packets? Hello Query Acknowledgment Reply Correct Answer: 3 Explanation EIGRP uses acknowledgment information to provide reliable delivery for certain EIGRP packets. An acknowledgment is essentially an EIGRP Hello packet [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14779"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14779"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14839,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14779\/revisions\/14839"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}