{"id":15392,"date":"2026-09-17T13:00:07","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T13:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15392"},"modified":"2026-09-17T13:00:07","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T13:00:07","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part2-q21-40","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part2-q21-40\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part2 Q21-40"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>\u00a0and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 21.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company plans to integrate Dynamics 365 Finance with several external systems. What should the solution architect document before selecting integration technologies?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> User desktop wallpaper standards<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Business events, data flows, volumes, frequency, and latency requirements<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Office seating arrangements<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Employee vacation preferences<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2. Business events, data flows, volumes, frequency, and latency requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Integration technology should be selected only after the architect understands what data must move, which systems participate, how frequently exchanges occur, expected transaction volumes, and acceptable latency. These details help determine whether synchronous APIs, asynchronous messaging, batch processing, business events, or other supported patterns are appropriate. Security, retry behavior, monitoring, and error handling should also be documented. Choosing technology before understanding the business and workload characteristics can lead to performance problems or unnecessary complexity. A clear integration inventory allows the architect to select patterns that are scalable, reliable, supportable, and aligned with the organization’s operational requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 22.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A customer wants to minimize customization in a Dynamics 365 implementation. Which activity should the solution architect emphasize during design workshops?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Recreating every legacy screen exactly<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Developing custom code before reviewing requirements<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Identifying standard capabilities that satisfy business outcomes<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Disabling standard functionality<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 3. Identifying standard capabilities that satisfy business outcomes<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Design workshops should focus on the business outcome and determine how standard Dynamics 365 capabilities can support it. This approach helps teams avoid reproducing legacy processes simply because users are familiar with them. Standard features generally reduce implementation effort, technical debt, regression testing, and future maintenance. When gaps remain, the architect can evaluate configuration, process changes, extensions, or supported third-party solutions. Customization should be driven by validated business requirements rather than preference alone. By emphasizing fit-to-standard discussions, the architect helps create a solution that is easier to maintain and more adaptable to future Dynamics 365 platform updates.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 23.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A multinational company wants each legal entity to use different fiscal calendars and financial configurations. What should the architect do?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Evaluate standard legal-entity configuration capabilities<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Create a different Dynamics 365 product for each country<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Store all configurations in spreadsheets<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Require identical fiscal settings across all companies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1. Evaluate standard legal-entity configuration capabilities<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Dynamics 365 Finance supports legal-entity-specific configurations for many financial and organizational requirements. The architect should determine whether standard capabilities can accommodate differences such as fiscal calendars, currencies, taxation, accounting settings, and reporting requirements. Using standard configurations provides greater consistency and supportability than creating separate custom solutions for each company. Shared processes can still be standardized where practical while legal entities retain necessary local differences. If specific jurisdictional or business requirements are not supported, the remaining gaps can then be evaluated for localization, extension, or ISV solutions. Architecture should balance global standardization with legitimate legal-entity requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 24.<\/b><\/p>\n

        An external application submits thousands of transactions to Dynamics 365 during a short processing window. Which design consideration is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> The user’s browser theme<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Whether users prefer printed reports<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The color of transaction forms<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Throughput, throttling, batching, and system performance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Throughput, throttling, batching, and system performance<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          High-volume integrations require careful consideration of throughput and platform limitations. The architect should evaluate transaction size, submission rate, available processing windows, API behavior, throttling, retry strategies, batching opportunities, and expected impact on other Dynamics 365 workloads. Sending thousands of individual synchronous requests may create unnecessary load when a supported batch or asynchronous pattern could process the workload more efficiently. Performance testing should use realistic volumes to validate the design before production deployment. Monitoring should also be included so operational teams can detect delays or failures. User-interface preferences do not determine the scalability of a high-volume integration.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 25.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A company wants developers to work on Dynamics 365 extensions without overwriting each other’s changes. What capability should be part of the development strategy?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Shared production credentials<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Source control and defined branching practices<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual copying of files between computers<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Development directly in production<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2. Source control and defined branching practices<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Source control provides a managed repository for code and allows development teams to track revisions, collaborate, review changes, and restore earlier versions when needed. A defined branching strategy helps coordinate parallel development and supports controlled integration of features and fixes. Source control should be incorporated into the broader application lifecycle management process along with builds, testing, release management, and deployment controls. Manual file copying makes it difficult to track changes and increases the risk of conflicts or lost work. Production environments should not be used as development workspaces. Structured development practices improve quality, traceability, and maintainability throughout the implementation lifecycle.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 26.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A customer requires a record of who changed important business data and when the changes occurred. What should the architect consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Disabling authentication<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Giving all users administrator access<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Appropriate auditing and logging capabilities<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Deleting historical information nightly<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 3. Appropriate auditing and logging capabilities<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              When the organization needs traceability for important business changes, the architecture should include appropriate auditing and logging. The architect should identify which data requires tracking, the retention expectations, who can access audit information, and how the records will support compliance or operational investigations. Logging should be designed carefully because tracking excessive information can increase storage and administration requirements. Access to audit records must also be protected. Auditing does not replace preventive security controls such as least privilege and segregation of duties, but it provides accountability by helping the organization determine which users performed relevant actions and when those actions occurred.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 27.<\/b><\/p>\n

              During requirements analysis, a business stakeholder proposes a highly complex customization for a process that occurs only twice a year. What should the architect do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Evaluate the business value, frequency, cost, and alternative approaches<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Approve the customization automatically<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Implement it directly in production<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Ignore the stakeholder without discussion<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1. Evaluate the business value, frequency, cost, and alternative approaches<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Solution decisions should consider business value as well as technical feasibility. A complex customization for an infrequent process may create significant implementation and maintenance costs compared with its benefit. The architect should clarify the requirement, evaluate operational impact, identify standard alternatives, and compare options such as a controlled manual process, configuration, automation, or custom development. The final decision should be made with relevant stakeholders based on risk and value rather than frequency alone. This analysis helps prevent unnecessary technical debt while ensuring that genuine compliance or business-critical requirements are not dismissed simply because they occur infrequently.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 28.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A project team needs to verify that a Dynamics 365 solution can handle expected production volumes before go-live. What type of testing should be performed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Only spelling checks<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Only unit testing<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Performance and load testing using representative workloads<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Testing with a single transaction only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3. Performance and load testing using representative workloads<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Performance and load testing evaluate whether the solution can support expected transaction volumes, concurrency, batch processing, integrations, and response-time targets. Tests should represent realistic business scenarios and include expected peak workloads rather than only average activity. The results can reveal bottlenecks in customizations, integrations, batch jobs, reporting, or configuration before users encounter them in production. Unit testing remains important for validating individual components, but it does not demonstrate end-to-end performance under realistic load. Performance testing should be planned early enough that identified issues can be corrected and retested without delaying the production cutover.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 29.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A company needs several applications to consume the same customer data. What architectural concern should be addressed first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Data ownership and the system of record<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Individual users’ screen resolutions<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Printer configuration<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Meeting-room availability<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Data ownership and the system of record<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    When multiple applications use the same business entity, the architect should establish which system is authoritative for creating and maintaining that data. Without a clearly defined system of record, applications can produce conflicting values, duplicate records, and unclear synchronization behavior. The design should also define how updates are distributed, how conflicts are handled, what identifiers are shared, and which systems can modify specific attributes. Data governance is especially important for foundational entities such as customers, vendors, products, and financial dimensions. Establishing ownership before designing integrations creates a more consistent and manageable enterprise data architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 30.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    An organization wants business users to access reports without receiving unnecessary access to transactional functions. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Give every reporting user system administrator access<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Share a common administrator account<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Disable authorization for reports<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Design reporting access according to least-privilege security requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 4. Design reporting access according to least-privilege security requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Reporting access should follow the same security principles as transactional access. Users should be able to view the information necessary for their roles without receiving permissions to perform unrelated transactions or administrative tasks. The architect should consider security roles, data sensitivity, legal-entity access, reporting platforms, and any row-level restrictions required by the organization. Shared administrator accounts weaken accountability and significantly increase risk. A well-designed reporting security model allows employees to obtain the information they need while protecting confidential data and preventing unnecessary changes to operational systems. Security requirements should therefore be included when the reporting architecture is designed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 31.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A critical business process depends on several integrations running in sequence. What should the architect include in the solution design?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Dependency management, monitoring, and failure recovery<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> No monitoring because integrations are automated<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual re-entry as the primary architecture<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Deletion of errors before investigation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Dependency management, monitoring, and failure recovery<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        When integrations depend on one another, a failure in an upstream process can prevent later transactions from completing correctly. The architecture should document dependencies and provide monitoring that makes failures visible to operations teams. Retry mechanisms, idempotency, reconciliation, and recovery procedures may be needed to safely resume processing. The architect should also consider whether tightly coupled dependencies can be reduced through asynchronous patterns. Automated processing does not eliminate the need for operational visibility. Designing for failure and recovery helps prevent missing or duplicated transactions and enables support teams to restore normal processing efficiently when dependent systems or services experience problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 32.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A Dynamics 365 implementation has several custom extensions. What should the architect recommend before Microsoft platform updates are applied to production?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Skip all testing<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Test the extensions and key business processes in a non-production environment<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Remove all security roles<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Apply the update directly to production first<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2. Test the extensions and key business processes in a non-production environment<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Custom extensions and critical business processes should be validated against platform updates before the updates reach production. Testing in an appropriate non-production environment provides an opportunity to identify compatibility issues, regression defects, integration failures, or changed behavior while there is still time to correct them. Automated regression tests can improve efficiency for frequently executed scenarios. The update-management process should also include ownership, issue triage, remediation, and release approval. Applying updates directly to production without validation increases operational risk. Designing customizations using supported extension patterns further reduces the likelihood that future platform changes will cause significant compatibility problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 33.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A business wants a custom feature that duplicates a standard Dynamics 365 capability but with slightly different terminology. What should the architect recommend first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Replace the entire module<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Review whether configuration, labels, or process adjustments can satisfy the requirement<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Develop a parallel custom module immediately<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Disable the standard capability<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2. Review whether configuration, labels, or process adjustments can satisfy the requirement<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Before creating custom functionality, the architect should determine whether the standard capability can meet the underlying business need through configuration or reasonable process adjustments. Sometimes the perceived gap is primarily terminology, workflow preference, or familiarity with a legacy system rather than a functional limitation. Reusing standard functionality avoids duplicating logic and reduces development, maintenance, testing, and upgrade costs. If the analysis confirms that important business requirements still cannot be met, an extension can then be evaluated. Architecture decisions should be based on business outcomes and lifecycle cost rather than automatically recreating familiar legacy experiences.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 34.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A company plans a production migration involving millions of records. What should be established before a cutover?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> An untested one-time migration script<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A decision to skip reconciliation<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> A rehearsed migration process with timing and validation criteria<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Immediate deletion of all source systems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3. A rehearsed migration process with timing and validation criteria<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Large migrations should be rehearsed using realistic data volumes before production cutover. Rehearsals help validate extraction, transformation, loading, sequencing, dependencies, and expected processing duration. They also allow the team to identify performance bottlenecks and refine the cutover schedule. Validation criteria should include record counts, financial balances, key relationships, and other business-specific reconciliation measures. The team should know how errors will be corrected and whether failed loads can be rerun safely. An untested migration introduces significant uncertainty, while deleting source information before validation could make recovery difficult. Repeatability and reconciliation are essential to reliable production migration.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 35.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A customer needs different approval processes based on transaction amount and business unit. What should the architect evaluate first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Whether standard workflow and approval capabilities meet the requirement<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A custom mobile application<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual email approvals with no controls<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Direct database updates<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Whether standard workflow and approval capabilities meet the requirement<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Dynamics 365 includes workflow capabilities that can support many conditional approval scenarios. The architect should determine whether standard workflow configuration can represent the required approval hierarchy, thresholds, business-unit rules, escalation paths, and audit needs. Using standard capabilities generally provides better maintainability and governance than creating custom approval engines. If genuine gaps exist, extensions or connected services can be considered after those gaps are documented. Manual approvals outside the system may weaken auditability and consistency, while direct database updates are not an appropriate business-process solution. Fit-to-standard analysis should precede custom development for approval requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 36.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                An implementation includes multiple vendors developing different solution components. Which governance practice is most important for maintaining architectural consistency?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Allowing each vendor to independently choose incompatible patterns<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Avoiding design documentation<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Giving every vendor unrestricted production access<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Establishing architecture standards and formal design reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 4. Establishing architecture standards and formal design reviews<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Multiple development teams can easily introduce inconsistent integration patterns, security models, naming conventions, and extension approaches if common standards are not established. The solution architect should define architectural principles and review significant designs before implementation. Documentation should cover supported technologies, integration patterns, coding practices, data ownership, security expectations, and operational requirements. Design reviews provide a forum for identifying duplication or conflicts early. Governance should enable teams to work efficiently rather than create unnecessary bureaucracy. Consistent architecture improves interoperability, supportability, security, and long-term maintenance across the complete Dynamics 365 solution landscape.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 37.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A company wants its Dynamics 365 implementation to continue operating reliably when an external service is temporarily unavailable. Which architectural characteristic is required?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Resilience<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Manual formatting<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Unlimited user privileges<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Removal of all queues<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Resilience<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Resilience is the ability of a solution to tolerate temporary failures and recover without causing unnecessary data loss or extended business disruption. For integrations, this may involve asynchronous processing, queues, retry policies, timeout handling, idempotency, monitoring, and reconciliation. The appropriate techniques depend on the business process and how long operations can tolerate delayed processing. The architect should identify dependencies and determine how the solution should behave when each dependency becomes unavailable. Resilience does not necessarily mean every service remains fully functional during a failure, but the architecture should fail predictably, protect data integrity, and support controlled recovery when service is restored.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 38.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A company discovers that different teams use inconsistent definitions for customer and product data. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> More duplicate databases<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Allow every integration to invent its own definitions<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Data governance and common business definitions<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Removal of validation rules<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 3. Data governance and common business definitions<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Consistent enterprise data requires agreed definitions, ownership, quality rules, and governance. If departments define customers or products differently without coordination, integrations and reports may produce conflicting results. The architect should work with business stakeholders and data owners to establish common definitions and identify authoritative systems for important entities. Governance should also define data-quality expectations, identifiers, validation rules, and processes for resolving issues. Technical integration alone cannot solve inconsistent business semantics. Establishing shared definitions makes data exchanges clearer and improves reporting, analytics, operational processes, and future system changes across the Dynamics 365 ecosystem.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 39.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company is preparing for Dynamics 365 go-live. Which activity best supports operational readiness?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Removing support documentation<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Defining monitoring, support ownership, escalation paths, and incident procedures<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Waiting until the first production failure to assign responsibilities<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Giving every user direct database access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2. Defining monitoring, support ownership, escalation paths, and incident procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Operational readiness ensures that the organization can support the solution once it becomes a production system. Before go-live, teams should know who owns different components, how problems will be detected, where incidents are reported, how severity is determined, and when issues should be escalated. Monitoring and alerting should be configured for critical integrations and processes. Support personnel also need appropriate documentation, access, and training. Waiting until a production failure occurs to determine responsibilities can extend downtime and create confusion. A clear operating model is therefore an important part of solution architecture and deployment planning.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 40.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A company wants to verify that the implemented Dynamics 365 solution satisfies the agreed business requirements before production deployment. What should be completed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Only developer unit tests<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Immediate production deployment<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Removal of acceptance criteria<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Business validation and user acceptance testing against defined requirements**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Business validation and user acceptance testing against defined requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          User acceptance testing confirms that the configured solution supports the business scenarios and requirements agreed during the project. Business representatives should execute realistic processes and validate expected results using predefined acceptance criteria. Defects and unresolved gaps should be documented, prioritized, corrected where appropriate, and retested before production approval. Technical tests such as unit, integration, regression, and performance testing are also important, but they do not replace business validation. A formal acceptance process gives stakeholders confidence that the solution is operationally suitable and provides documented evidence that key requirements have been evaluated before the organization proceeds with go-live.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps \u00a0and Practice Test Dumps   Question 21. A company plans to integrate Dynamics 365 Finance with several external systems. What should the solution architect document before selecting integration technologies? User desktop wallpaper standards 2. Business events, data flows, volumes, frequency, and latency requirements 3. Office seating arrangements 4. Employee […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15392"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15392"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15392\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15431,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15392\/revisions\/15431"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}