{"id":15393,"date":"2026-09-17T12:51:16","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:51:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15393"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:51:16","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:51:16","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part3-q41-60","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part3-q41-60\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part3 Q41-60"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 41.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company is reviewing its Dynamics 365 architecture and discovers that several integrations exchange the same customer information independently. What should the solution architect recommend first?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Create additional duplicate integrations<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Identify a shared data strategy and authoritative source for customer data<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Allow every system to update every customer field<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Remove all customer validation rules<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2. Identify a shared data strategy and authoritative source for customer data<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    When several integrations exchange the same business data independently, the architect should first establish data ownership and determine which system is authoritative. A shared data strategy can reduce duplication, conflicting updates, and unnecessary integration complexity. The design should define which system creates and maintains each data element, how updates are distributed, and how synchronization conflicts are handled. Common identifiers and validation rules should also be established. Adding more point-to-point integrations usually increases maintenance effort and makes troubleshooting more difficult. A clearly governed approach to customer data creates a more scalable and consistent enterprise architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 42.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A Dynamics 365 implementation requires a custom extension that will be used by several business processes. What should the architect consider most carefully before approving the design?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> The extension’s maintainability, performance, security, and upgrade impact<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The developer’s preferred screen color<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The number of meeting rooms available<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Whether the extension name is short<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 1. The extension’s maintainability, performance, security, and upgrade impact<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      A reusable extension can affect multiple areas of the solution, so its long-term impact should be evaluated carefully. The architect should review whether the design follows supported extension patterns, scales appropriately, protects sensitive data, and can be tested during future platform updates. Dependencies on other components should also be documented. A design that works functionally but creates performance bottlenecks or upgrade difficulties can become expensive to maintain. Reusable components should have clear ownership, documentation, testing, and release procedures. Technical decisions should therefore consider the entire solution lifecycle rather than only the immediate requirement.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 43.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A company wants users to approve business transactions from outside Dynamics 365 while maintaining security and auditability. What should the solution architect evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Unauthenticated public links<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Shared administrator accounts<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Supported workflow and integration options with authenticated access<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Manual approval through personal messaging applications<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Supported workflow and integration options with authenticated access<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        External approval experiences should preserve the security, authorization, and audit requirements of the underlying business process. The architect should evaluate supported workflow and integration capabilities that allow authenticated users to receive, review, and approve transactions without bypassing Dynamics 365 controls. The solution should record who performed the approval, when it occurred, and which transaction was affected. Shared credentials or unauthenticated links weaken accountability and can create compliance risks. The design should also consider error handling, notification reliability, and user experience. Security and traceability remain important even when the approval interface is outside the core application.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 44.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A project team proposes running a large data import during normal business hours. What should the solution architect assess before approving the schedule?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> The size of the office cafeteria<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The preferred browser of each user<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Employee parking availability<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Expected system load, processing time, and impact on users**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Expected system load, processing time, and impact on users<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Large data imports can consume significant processing resources and may affect interactive users, batch jobs, integrations, and other business operations. The architect should evaluate the expected volume, duration, concurrency, and resource requirements before deciding when the import should run. Performance testing with representative data can help determine whether the process should be scheduled during a lower-activity window. The architecture should also include monitoring, error handling, and restart procedures. Scheduling a resource-intensive process without understanding its impact can create unnecessary performance problems. Operational timing should therefore be based on measured workload characteristics and business priorities.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 45.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A global organization wants to standardize its Dynamics 365 implementation while allowing legally required differences between countries. Which approach should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Define a global template with controlled local variations<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Build unrelated solutions for every country<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Prevent all local requirements from being implemented<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Allow each country to customize without governance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Define a global template with controlled local variations<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            A global template provides a common foundation for processes, configurations, security, data, and integrations while still allowing justified local differences. This approach supports consistency and reduces duplication across countries. Local variations should be limited to validated business, regulatory, tax, or localization requirements and should follow defined governance. Completely independent implementations can increase cost and make future maintenance difficult, while forcing identical processes everywhere may fail to meet legal obligations. The architect should balance standardization with necessary flexibility. A governed global template creates a scalable framework for multinational deployments and makes future rollout waves easier to manage.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 46.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A customer requires sensitive financial information to be visible only to authorized roles. What should the architect prioritize?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Giving all users read access<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Role-based security and least-privilege access<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Publishing the information to a shared folder<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Removing authentication requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. Role-based security and least-privilege access<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Sensitive financial data should be protected using a structured security model that grants access only to users who need it for their responsibilities. Role-based security helps align permissions with job functions, while least privilege reduces unnecessary exposure. The architect should also consider legal-entity access, segregation of duties, reporting access, integration identities, and administrative privileges. Security should be tested to verify that users cannot access information outside their responsibilities. Broad read access or shared storage can undermine confidentiality. A properly designed security model supports compliance, accountability, and operational efficiency without giving users more permissions than necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 47.<\/b><\/p>\n

              A company is replacing a legacy ERP system with Dynamics 365. What should the architect determine before deciding how much historical data to migrate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> The color of the legacy application<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The number of developers assigned to the project<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Business, legal, reporting, and retention requirements<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> The age of user laptops<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Business, legal, reporting, and retention requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Not all historical data necessarily needs to be migrated into the new operational system. The architect should work with business, legal, finance, and compliance stakeholders to determine which historical records are required for daily operations, statutory retention, audits, reporting, or customer service. Older information may sometimes be retained in an archive rather than loaded into Dynamics 365. This can reduce migration complexity and improve data quality. The decision should also consider access needs, security, reconciliation, and future reporting. Migration scope should therefore be driven by justified business and regulatory requirements rather than automatically moving every legacy record.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 48.<\/b><\/p>\n

                An integration must ensure that retrying a failed message does not create duplicate transactions. Which design characteristic is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> High screen resolution<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Additional user accounts<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual spreadsheet tracking<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Idempotent processing**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Idempotent processing<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Idempotent processing allows the same request or message to be processed more than once without unintentionally creating duplicate business transactions. This is especially important in asynchronous integrations where network failures or timeouts may cause a sender to retry a message even though the original transaction was already received. The architect should use unique identifiers, duplicate detection, or other supported techniques to make retries safe. Reliable integrations should also include logging, monitoring, and reconciliation. Without idempotency, temporary failures can result in duplicate invoices, orders, payments, or other records, creating significant operational and financial problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 49.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A company wants to reduce the risk of production issues caused by configuration changes. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Apply changes directly in production<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Test and promote changes through controlled environments<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Allow every user to modify production configuration<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Skip documentation for small changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 2. Test and promote changes through controlled environments<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Configuration changes can affect business processes just as custom code can, so they should follow a controlled lifecycle. Changes should be developed or configured in an appropriate non-production environment, validated through testing, documented, and then promoted using an approved release process. This helps identify unintended effects before users are impacted. The architect should also establish ownership, approval criteria, and rollback or remediation procedures. Direct production changes can create inconsistencies between environments and make troubleshooting more difficult. A disciplined environment strategy improves traceability, stability, and confidence when changes are introduced into the live solution.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 50.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A Dynamics 365 implementation includes a critical nightly batch process that must complete before business opens. What should the solution architect define?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Processing window, dependencies, monitoring, and recovery procedures<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> User wallpaper standards<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Printer manufacturer requirements<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Office lighting schedules<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1. Processing window, dependencies, monitoring, and recovery procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A business-critical batch process needs a clearly defined operational design. The architect should understand how long the process normally takes, its dependencies, required completion time, expected data volume, and impact on other workloads. Monitoring and alerting should notify support teams if the job starts late, fails, or exceeds its expected duration. Recovery procedures should explain how to restart or resume processing safely. Performance testing can validate whether the available batch window is sufficient. Defining these operational requirements in advance helps ensure that the process consistently completes before users begin daily work and reduces the impact of unexpected failures.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 51.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A business process requires data from an external service, but occasional delays are acceptable. Which integration approach should the architect generally consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Asynchronous processing where appropriate<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A mandatory synchronous call for every transaction<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Direct database access to the external system<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Manual data entry only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Asynchronous processing where appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        When immediate responses are not required, asynchronous processing can improve resilience and reduce tight coupling between systems. Messages can be queued and processed independently, allowing one system to continue operating even if the other is temporarily unavailable. The architect should still define acceptable latency, retry behavior, monitoring, ordering requirements, and duplicate handling. Synchronous integration may be appropriate when a user or process truly requires an immediate response, but it can create stronger dependencies between systems. Selecting an asynchronous pattern when business timing allows it can improve scalability, reliability, and operational flexibility across the integration architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 52.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A customer has identified a requirement that cannot be met through standard Dynamics 365 configuration. What should the architect do next?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Reject the requirement automatically<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Modify the Microsoft application database directly<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Evaluate supported extension or ISV solution options<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Give users system administrator access instead<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3. Evaluate supported extension or ISV solution options<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          When a validated requirement cannot be met through standard configuration, the architect should evaluate supported approaches for closing the gap. Options may include an extension, an ISV solution, an integration, or a controlled process change. Each option should be assessed for business value, cost, maintainability, security, performance, supportability, and future upgrade impact. Direct database modification or unsupported changes should be avoided because they can create significant operational and lifecycle risks. The goal is not to eliminate all customization, but to ensure that any customization is justified and implemented using patterns that fit the broader solution architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 53.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A company wants to establish a reliable support model after Dynamics 365 goes live. Which element is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Waiting until incidents occur before assigning responsibilities<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Defined ownership, escalation paths, service expectations, and support procedures<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Removing all technical documentation<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Using a shared administrator password<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2. Defined ownership, escalation paths, service expectations, and support procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A production solution needs a clear operating model so incidents can be detected, assigned, investigated, and resolved efficiently. The organization should define ownership for functional areas, integrations, environments, customizations, and external dependencies. Escalation paths and service expectations should identify how critical incidents are handled and when additional teams or vendors should be involved. Support personnel need appropriate documentation, access, monitoring tools, and knowledge-transfer materials. Waiting until failures occur to decide who is responsible can extend downtime and create confusion. Operational support should therefore be designed as part of the implementation rather than added after go-live.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 54.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A project team is selecting an architecture for a new interface. Which factor should have the greatest influence on whether the interface is synchronous or asynchronous?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> The preferred font in Dynamics 365<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The number of conference rooms<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Business latency and transaction-response requirements<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Employee dress code<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3. Business latency and transaction-response requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              The need for an immediate response is a primary factor when choosing between synchronous and asynchronous integration. If a user cannot continue without receiving a result, a synchronous approach may be appropriate. If a delay is acceptable, asynchronous processing can often improve resilience and scalability by reducing direct dependencies between systems. Volume, error handling, ordering, availability, and throughput should also be considered. The architect should avoid choosing an integration style based on developer preference alone. The selected pattern should reflect business timing requirements while balancing performance, reliability, maintainability, and the operational behavior of all participating systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 55.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A multinational organization wants to restrict users so they can work only with specific legal entities. What should the solution architect include in the security design?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Appropriate organization-based access and security-role assignments<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> One unrestricted account for all employees<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Anonymous access to financial records<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Removal of role-based security<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Appropriate organization-based access and security-role assignments<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Users in a multinational organization may require different permissions across legal entities, so the security architecture should reflect both job responsibilities and organizational scope. The architect should design roles and organization-based access so users can perform approved tasks only in the companies or entities relevant to their responsibilities. This approach supports least privilege and helps reduce accidental or unauthorized access to financial and operational information. The design should also consider segregation of duties and reporting requirements. Shared unrestricted accounts undermine accountability and make it difficult to enforce company-specific access. Security should be tested with representative user personas before production deployment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 56.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A company plans to retire its legacy ERP after moving to Dynamics 365. What should be confirmed before the old system is decommissioned?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> That users dislike the legacy interface<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> That all old hardware has been repainted<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> That migration, reconciliation, retention, and archival requirements are satisfied<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> That every legacy table has been deleted immediately<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 3. That migration, reconciliation, retention, and archival requirements are satisfied<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A legacy system should not be decommissioned until the organization confirms that required data has been migrated, reconciled, or preserved according to business and legal requirements. Some historical records may need to remain accessible for audits, reporting, tax, customer service, or regulatory retention periods. The team should also verify that integrations and dependent processes have been redirected successfully. Archival access should be tested before the old environment is removed. Immediate deletion could cause irreversible data loss. A structured decommissioning plan should therefore include business sign-off, retention decisions, security, archival methods, and confirmation that no active dependency remains.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 57.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A company wants to verify that a new integration remains reliable when the external endpoint is temporarily unavailable. What should the testing strategy include?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Failure, retry, timeout, and recovery scenarios<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Only successful transactions<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Only user-interface testing<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> No testing because the interface is automated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Failure, retry, timeout, and recovery scenarios<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Integration testing should validate both successful processing and expected failure conditions. Temporary endpoint outages, network timeouts, authentication failures, duplicate messages, and retry behavior are common real-world scenarios that should be tested before production. The team should confirm that failed transactions are logged, recoverable, and do not create duplicates when they are retried. Monitoring and alerts should also be validated so operational teams can detect problems quickly. Testing only the happy path can leave serious reliability issues undiscovered. Resilience testing provides evidence that the integration behaves predictably and protects data integrity when external dependencies experience problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 58.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A solution architect identifies several customizations that are no longer required because standard Dynamics 365 features now provide the same functionality. What should be recommended?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Add more custom code around them<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Keep all customizations permanently without review<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Evaluate retiring the customizations in favor of standard functionality<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Modify the standard product to match the old customization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 3. Evaluate retiring the customizations in favor of standard functionality<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      When standard functionality can replace older customizations, the architect should evaluate whether those custom components can be retired safely. Reducing unnecessary customization can lower maintenance costs, simplify testing, improve upgrade compatibility, and reduce technical debt. The analysis should verify that the standard capability truly satisfies current business requirements and that dependent integrations, reports, data, and processes are considered. A controlled migration and regression test may be required before removing the customization. Custom code should not be retained simply because it already exists. Architecture should evolve as the platform adds capabilities that can simplify the overall solution.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 59.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company wants to ensure that business-critical reports show consistent results across departments. What should the architect emphasize?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Independent calculations created by each team<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Governed data definitions, shared metrics, and consistent data sources<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual recalculation of every report<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Removal of data validation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2. Governed data definitions, shared metrics, and consistent data sources<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Consistent reporting depends on more than selecting a reporting tool. The organization needs agreed definitions for key measures, authoritative data sources, transformation logic, and ownership. If departments calculate revenue, inventory, customers, or other metrics differently, reports can conflict even when they use the same underlying platform. The architect should support governance that establishes shared definitions and controls how data is prepared for analytics. Security and refresh timing should also be documented. A governed reporting architecture improves trust in information and reduces time spent reconciling different versions of the same business metric across departments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 60.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Before approving production go-live, what should the solution architect confirm regarding critical unresolved issues?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> They can all be ignored if the schedule is fixed<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> They should be hidden from business stakeholders<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> They should automatically be moved to the next project<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Their risks, ownership, mitigation, and business acceptance are clearly documented**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Their risks, ownership, mitigation, and business acceptance are clearly documented<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Not every issue must necessarily be resolved before go-live, but critical open items must be understood and governed. The architect and project leadership should ensure that remaining risks are documented, assigned to owners, evaluated for business and technical impact, and supported by realistic mitigation or contingency plans. Appropriate stakeholders should explicitly understand and accept the residual risk before production deployment. Issues that could threaten data integrity, compliance, security, or essential operations may require resolution before go-live. Transparent risk management allows decision-makers to make informed deployment choices instead of relying solely on schedule pressure or incomplete information.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 41. A company is reviewing its Dynamics 365 architecture and discovers that several integrations exchange the same customer information independently. What should the solution architect recommend first? Create additional duplicate integrations 2. Identify a shared data strategy and authoritative source for customer data […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15393"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15393"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15430,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15393\/revisions\/15430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}