{"id":15394,"date":"2026-09-17T12:50:57","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:50:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15394"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:50:57","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:50:57","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part4-q61-80","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part4-q61-80\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part4 Q61-80"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 61.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company is defining the future-state architecture for its Dynamics 365 implementation. What should the solution architect identify first?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> The required business capabilities and solution components<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The final production support roster<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The complete list of user passwords<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> The detailed regression test scripts<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. The required business capabilities and solution components<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    The future-state architecture should begin with a clear understanding of the business capabilities the solution must support. These capabilities can then be mapped to Dynamics 365 applications, integrations, data services, reporting components, and other required technologies. Starting with detailed testing or operational tasks before understanding the target business architecture can lead to gaps or unnecessary complexity. The architect should also identify major dependencies, constraints, and nonfunctional requirements such as security, performance, availability, and scalability. Once the future-state capability model is understood, the implementation team can create a more accurate and maintainable solution design.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 62.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A company has several requirements that appear to overlap across departments. What should the solution architect do?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Build separate customizations for each department immediately<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Consolidate and analyze the related requirements<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Remove the requirements from scope<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Let each department select its own unrelated platform<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Consolidate and analyze the related requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Related requirements should be consolidated and analyzed to determine whether they represent the same underlying business capability. Different departments often describe similar needs using different terminology. Identifying overlap can reduce duplicated functionality, simplify integrations, and create a more consistent user experience. The architect should work with stakeholders to clarify the intended outcomes and determine whether a shared standard capability can satisfy multiple requirements. If meaningful differences remain, they can then be documented and addressed appropriately. Creating separate solutions before understanding the relationship between requirements can increase technical debt, implementation cost, and long-term support complexity.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 63.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A customer wants to use a third-party solution with Dynamics 365 Finance. What should the architect evaluate before recommending it?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Only the vendor’s marketing materials<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Only the purchase price<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Functional fit, integration, security, supportability, and lifecycle impact<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> The vendor’s office location<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Functional fit, integration, security, supportability, and lifecycle impact<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        A third-party solution should be assessed across both business and technical dimensions. The architect should determine whether it satisfies the functional requirement, integrates appropriately with Dynamics 365, protects data, and follows supported deployment and extension patterns. Vendor support, release compatibility, licensing, performance, operational monitoring, and future upgrade implications should also be considered. Selecting a product solely on cost or marketing claims may introduce risks that become expensive later. A structured evaluation helps ensure that an ISV solution fits the wider architecture and can be maintained reliably throughout the lifecycle of the Dynamics 365 implementation.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 64.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A business-critical integration must continue processing even when one downstream system is temporarily offline. Which architecture should the solution architect favor?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> A tightly coupled synchronous dependency only<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Manual re-entry for every failed transaction<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Direct database writes between systems<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> An asynchronous pattern with durable messaging and retry handling**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. An asynchronous pattern with durable messaging and retry handling<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          An asynchronous integration can decouple systems so that temporary downtime in one application does not immediately stop processing in another. Durable messaging allows transactions to wait safely until the receiving system becomes available. The design should include retry policies, monitoring, duplicate protection, dead-letter handling where appropriate, and reconciliation procedures. Synchronous patterns may still be appropriate when an immediate response is required, but they create stronger runtime dependencies. For a process that can tolerate delayed delivery, asynchronous messaging generally provides better resilience. The architect should still validate latency, ordering, throughput, and business recovery requirements before finalizing the pattern.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 65.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A company needs to control which users can create vendors and which users can approve vendor payments. Which security concept is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Segregation of duties<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Anonymous access<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Shared user accounts<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Full administrative access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Segregation of duties<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Segregation of duties helps reduce the risk that one person can complete conflicting activities that could enable fraud or unauthorized transactions. In this example, separating vendor creation from payment approval provides an important internal control. The solution architect should work with security and business stakeholders to identify critical conflicts and design roles that support operational needs without combining incompatible responsibilities. Least privilege should also be applied so users receive only the permissions needed for their jobs. Security design should be reviewed and tested before production to ensure that conflicting duties are appropriately controlled and exceptions are formally governed.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 66.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A Dynamics 365 project includes many extensions developed by different teams. What should the architect use to reduce inconsistent technical designs?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Individual developer preferences<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Architecture principles, standards, and design reviews<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Direct production changes<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Separate undocumented patterns for each team<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. Architecture principles, standards, and design reviews<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Shared architecture principles and standards help multiple teams build components that work together consistently. The architect should define preferred integration patterns, extension approaches, security practices, naming conventions, error-handling requirements, and operational expectations. Formal design reviews can identify duplicate functionality, unsupported approaches, or unnecessary complexity before development progresses too far. This governance should be practical and proportionate rather than creating excessive bureaucracy. Without common standards, different teams may create incompatible designs that are difficult to support. Consistency improves maintainability, testing, security, performance, and the overall quality of the Dynamics 365 solution.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 67.<\/b><\/p>\n

              A customer wants to retain ten years of historical transaction data but only the most recent two years are used frequently. What should the architect evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Data retention and archival options based on access requirements<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Deleting all records older than two years<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Keeping all data in user spreadsheets<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Preventing access to historical data permanently<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1. Data retention and archival options based on access requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Long-term data should be managed according to business, legal, reporting, and operational requirements. If recent transactions are frequently accessed while older records are needed mainly for audits or occasional reporting, the architect should evaluate archival strategies rather than assuming all historical data must remain in the primary transactional workload. The design should consider retrieval expectations, retention periods, security, storage costs, reporting needs, and regulatory obligations. Archived data must remain accessible when required and should be protected appropriately. A deliberate retention strategy can reduce unnecessary operational data volume while still preserving information the organization is required to keep.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 68.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A company experiences slow performance because a custom integration sends many individual requests during peak hours. What should the solution architect investigate first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> User monitor sizes<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Office network printer settings<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Batching, request frequency, throughput, and integration design<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> The name of the integration service account<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3. Batching, request frequency, throughput, and integration design<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A high number of small requests can create unnecessary overhead and contribute to throttling or performance degradation. The architect should review whether transactions can be batched, scheduled differently, processed asynchronously, or otherwise optimized. Request frequency, payload size, concurrency, retry behavior, and the impact on Dynamics 365 workloads should be measured. Performance testing can help confirm whether proposed changes improve throughput without affecting other processes. The account name itself does not determine performance. Integration design should balance business latency requirements with efficient use of platform resources, especially during periods of high user and transaction activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 69.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A project is preparing a solution design document. What should the document provide to technical and business stakeholders?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Only screenshots of Dynamics 365 forms<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A clear description of components, data flows, integrations, security, and key design decisions<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Only a list of project team members<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Personal preferences of the development team<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 2. A clear description of components, data flows, integrations, security, and key design decisions<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A solution design document should communicate how the proposed solution will satisfy the agreed business and technical requirements. It should describe major components, system boundaries, data ownership, integrations, security, deployment considerations, and important architectural decisions. Diagrams can help illustrate relationships and data flows, while assumptions and dependencies should be made explicit. The document creates a shared understanding among stakeholders and provides a basis for development, testing, operations, and future maintenance. It should be detailed enough to guide implementation while remaining understandable to the audiences who need to review and approve the architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 70.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A company is deciding whether to customize a process or adopt the standard Dynamics 365 process. Which factor should drive the decision most strongly?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Whether users are familiar with the legacy screen<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Whether a developer prefers custom code<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Whether the old system used the same terminology<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> The business outcome, value, risk, and lifecycle impact**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 4. The business outcome, value, risk, and lifecycle impact<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Architecture decisions should focus on achieving the required business outcome while considering the total lifecycle impact of each option. Reproducing a legacy process exactly may add customization without delivering additional business value. The architect should compare standard functionality, process change, configuration, extension, and other supported options. Cost, risk, maintainability, upgradeability, user impact, compliance, and operational value should all be considered. Familiarity alone is not sufficient justification for customization. A structured decision helps ensure that custom development is used when it provides meaningful benefit rather than simply preserving historical behavior that could be handled effectively by standard Dynamics 365 capabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 71.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A customer wants dashboards that display near-real-time operational information. What should the architect establish first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> The required data freshness, audience, data sources, and performance expectations<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The color of every chart<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The brand of the users’ monitors<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> A requirement that every report refresh only once per month<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. The required data freshness, audience, data sources, and performance expectations<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        The term near-real-time can mean different things to different stakeholders. The architect should define how fresh the data must actually be, who will consume it, which systems supply the information, and how many users or queries the reporting workload must support. These requirements influence the appropriate reporting and integration architecture. Refresh frequency should be balanced against performance and operational cost. The architect should also consider data security and whether analytical workloads should be isolated from transactional processing. Clear requirements prevent the team from implementing unnecessary real-time complexity when a short delay would still satisfy the business need.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 72.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A company is preparing to migrate opening balances into Dynamics 365 Finance. What is essential after the migration is completed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Reconciliation against the approved source balances<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Immediate deletion of all migration evidence<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Disabling financial controls<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Changing all balances manually without documentation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1. Reconciliation against the approved source balances<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Financial data migration must be validated to ensure that the balances loaded into Dynamics 365 match the approved source information. Reconciliation should use agreed control totals and business validation criteria, such as account balances, legal-entity totals, or other relevant financial measures. Any differences should be investigated and resolved before the migration is accepted. Migration evidence should be retained as required for audit and project governance. Accurate reconciliation is especially important for opening balances because errors can affect financial reporting from the first day of production. A repeatable validation process improves confidence in the cutover and reduces downstream correction work.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 73.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A company has strict regulatory requirements for protecting sensitive data exchanged with external systems. What should the integration architecture include?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Authentication, authorization, encryption, and secure credential management<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Shared passwords stored in plain text<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Anonymous access to integration endpoints<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Publicly accessible transaction files<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. Authentication, authorization, encryption, and secure credential management<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Sensitive data should be protected throughout the integration lifecycle. The architecture should use appropriate authentication to verify participating systems, authorization to limit access, encryption to protect data in transit, and secure methods for storing and rotating credentials. Logging and monitoring should provide traceability without exposing confidential information. The solution should also follow organizational and regulatory requirements for data handling and retention. Shared passwords or publicly accessible files introduce unnecessary risk and weaken accountability. Security should be designed into the integration architecture from the beginning rather than added after the functional interface has already been built.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 74.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A company wants to reduce deployment risk when releasing a major Dynamics 365 change. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Skip preproduction validation to save time<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Deploy the change directly to all users at once without testing<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Use a controlled release process with testing and rollback planning<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Allow developers to change production independently<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3. Use a controlled release process with testing and rollback planning<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Major changes should follow a structured release process that includes validation in appropriate non-production environments, business testing, technical testing, deployment planning, and clearly defined responsibilities. The team should also understand how to recover or mitigate the release if a critical issue occurs. Release readiness should include dependencies such as integrations, data changes, security, user communications, and support coverage. Direct uncontrolled deployments increase the likelihood of production disruption and make troubleshooting more difficult. A disciplined release process provides traceability and allows stakeholders to make an informed go-live decision based on tested results and known risks.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 75.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A critical batch job sometimes fails because of invalid source data. What should the solution architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Remove all validation to prevent failures<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Add data validation, error handling, monitoring, and correction procedures<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Ignore failed records permanently<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Give end users direct database access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 2. Add data validation, error handling, monitoring, and correction procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Invalid data should be detected and handled in a controlled way rather than allowing bad records to enter the system or stopping processing without visibility. The architect should determine where validation is most appropriate and ensure failed records are logged with enough information for support teams to investigate. Monitoring and alerts should identify significant failures, while documented correction and reprocessing procedures should allow valid transactions to continue when possible. Removing validation can create more serious downstream data-quality problems. A robust batch architecture protects data integrity while giving operations teams practical tools for resolving exceptions efficiently.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 76.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A company is planning several Dynamics 365 environments. What should guide the environment strategy?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Random assignment of environments<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A requirement that every user receive a separate environment<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The number of office locations only<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Development, testing, training, release, and operational lifecycle needs**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 4. Development, testing, training, release, and operational lifecycle needs<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Environment planning should support the complete application lifecycle. Development teams need appropriate spaces for building changes, while testing environments support functional, integration, regression, and performance validation. Training may require stable data and configurations that are not continuously changing. Release processes also need controlled paths for promoting validated changes toward production. The number and purpose of environments should reflect project scale, governance, parallel workstreams, data sensitivity, and operational requirements. Creating environments without a clear purpose can increase cost and complexity, while too few environments can cause conflicts between development, testing, training, and release activities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 77.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A new requirement affects finance, supply chain, reporting, and three external integrations. What should the architect do before approving the change?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Perform an impact assessment across affected components<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Approve it based only on the finance team’s request<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Implement it directly in production<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Review only the user interface change<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Perform an impact assessment across affected components<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A requirement that crosses multiple functional and technical areas can have significant downstream consequences. The architect should evaluate how the proposed change affects business processes, integrations, data models, security, reporting, performance, testing, and deployment. Dependencies between components should be identified so that the project can estimate effort and risk accurately. Stakeholders from affected areas may need to participate in the review. Approving a change based on only one team’s perspective can result in unexpected defects or architectural inconsistencies. A complete impact assessment supports better scope, design, scheduling, and go-live decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 78.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A project wants to ensure that custom integrations are easy to operate after go-live. What should the architect require?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> No logs to reduce storage usage<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Monitoring, meaningful logging, alerts, and support documentation<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Developer-only knowledge with no documentation<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Manual database inspection as the primary monitoring method<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2. Monitoring, meaningful logging, alerts, and support documentation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      An integration is not complete simply because it works during development. Production support teams need visibility into transaction status, failures, processing delays, and external dependencies. Meaningful logs should provide enough detail to diagnose issues without unnecessarily exposing sensitive data. Alerts should identify conditions that require intervention, and support documentation should explain common errors, recovery steps, ownership, and escalation paths. Operational capabilities should be designed and tested before go-live. Without them, even minor integration failures can take much longer to identify and resolve. Operability is therefore an important architectural quality alongside functional correctness.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 79.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company wants to improve confidence in frequent Dynamics 365 releases. Which testing capability should the architect encourage?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Repeatable automated regression testing for stable business scenarios<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Eliminating regression testing entirely<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Relying only on production users to find defects<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Testing only newly developed screens<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. Repeatable automated regression testing for stable business scenarios<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Automated regression testing can repeatedly validate important business scenarios as the solution changes over time. This is especially valuable for frequent releases because manual execution of the same stable tests can become slow and inconsistent. Automation should focus on high-value, repeatable processes and should complement rather than replace other testing such as exploratory, integration, performance, and user acceptance testing. Test results should be reviewed and maintained as business processes evolve. A strong regression strategy helps identify unintended effects earlier in the release cycle and supports faster, more reliable deployment decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 80.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A Dynamics 365 implementation is approaching go-live. Which action best helps ensure that business users are ready to operate the new solution?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Delay all training until after production deployment<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Provide administrator permissions to every user<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Complete role-based training, communications, and readiness validation<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Remove support documentation before launch**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3. Complete role-based training, communications, and readiness validation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Technical readiness alone does not ensure a successful go-live. Business users need training that reflects their actual roles and processes, along with clear communications about timing, changes, support channels, and responsibilities. Readiness activities should confirm that users understand how to complete critical tasks and know where to obtain help. Super users or business champions can provide additional support during transition. Training should use sufficiently stable processes and environments so that it reflects the production experience. Combining business readiness with technical validation reduces adoption problems and helps the organization transition more effectively to the new Dynamics 365 solution.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 61. A company is defining the future-state architecture for its Dynamics 365 implementation. What should the solution architect identify first? The required business capabilities and solution components 2. The final production support roster 3. The complete list of user passwords 4. The detailed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15394"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15394"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15394\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15429,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15394\/revisions\/15429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}