{"id":15397,"date":"2026-09-17T12:50:30","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15397"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:50:30","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:50:30","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part7 Q121-140"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full<\/b> Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 121.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company is designing an integration between Dynamics 365 Finance and a warehouse system. The warehouse system can process messages only in the order they are received. What should the solution architect consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Message ordering requirements in the integration design<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The display resolution of warehouse terminals<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The branding used on reports<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> The number of user training sessions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. Message ordering requirements in the integration design<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    If the receiving system depends on transactions arriving in a specific sequence, message ordering becomes an important architectural requirement. The solution architect should evaluate whether the selected integration pattern can preserve ordering and how retries or failures might affect sequence. The design should also address duplicate detection, monitoring, and recovery if one message fails while later messages are waiting. Ignoring ordering requirements can result in invalid business states, such as a shipment update arriving before the related order. Integration design must therefore reflect not only data content and volume but also the sequencing behavior required by the downstream process.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 122.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A customer wants to reduce the number of custom integrations in its Dynamics 365 landscape. What should the solution architect do first?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Replace every integration with manual data entry<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Review existing integrations for duplication and opportunities to consolidate<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Disable all interfaces<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Build additional point-to-point integrations<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Review existing integrations for duplication and opportunities to consolidate<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      The architect should first understand the current integration landscape and identify duplicate data flows, overlapping interfaces, and systems that exchange the same information independently. Consolidating common integration patterns can reduce complexity, maintenance effort, and support costs. The review should also establish data ownership and determine whether shared services or common messaging patterns could replace multiple point-to-point connections. Manual processing is not a scalable substitute, and adding more integrations would increase complexity. A rationalized integration architecture is easier to monitor, secure, test, and evolve as the Dynamics 365 environment grows.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 123.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A company needs to ensure that custom development follows supported Dynamics 365 patterns. Which governance activity should the architect emphasize?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Allow every developer to choose any technique<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Avoid documenting technical standards<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Architecture and code-design reviews<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Direct modification of standard application code<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Architecture and code-design reviews<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Architecture and design reviews help confirm that custom development follows supported platform patterns and aligns with broader solution standards. The architect should review extensions for maintainability, performance, security, integration impact, and upgrade compatibility before they become deeply embedded in the solution. Technical standards can also guide developers toward consistent approaches. Without governance, teams may create unsupported modifications or duplicate functionality that becomes expensive to maintain. Reviews should be practical and focused on high-impact changes. The goal is to detect architectural issues early, when they are easier and less costly to correct.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 124.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A customer wants a business process to continue even when a reporting platform is unavailable. What architectural principle should be applied?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Make transactional processing depend directly on reporting availability<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Stop all Dynamics 365 activity when reports are unavailable<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Require manual reports before every transaction<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Decouple operational processing from noncritical reporting dependencies**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Decouple operational processing from noncritical reporting dependencies<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Operational business processes should not depend unnecessarily on noncritical analytical systems. If the reporting platform is temporarily unavailable, transactional processing in Dynamics 365 should generally continue unless the report is genuinely required to complete the business process. Decoupling reduces failure propagation and improves resilience. Data can often be transferred to analytical platforms asynchronously, allowing reporting to recover independently. The architect should identify critical versus noncritical dependencies and design system boundaries accordingly. This helps prevent an outage in one supporting component from causing a wider business disruption across otherwise healthy operational services.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 125.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A company wants to determine whether users can access sensitive information outside their responsibilities. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Security testing based on representative roles and personas<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Giving all users administrator access for testing<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Disabling security temporarily<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Using one shared test account for every department<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Security testing based on representative roles and personas<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Representative user personas allow the project team to validate security from the perspective of actual job responsibilities. Tests should confirm both positive access, where users can complete required tasks, and negative access, where they are prevented from viewing or changing unauthorized data. The review should cover roles, legal-entity scope, sensitive information, and segregation-of-duties conflicts. Broad administrator access cannot validate the intended security model. Testing before go-live helps identify excessive permissions and missing access early, reducing the likelihood of security or operational issues once real users begin working in production.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 126.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A project team needs to move configuration and code changes through several environments. What should guide the promotion process?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Informal decisions by individual developers<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A defined ALM process with testing and approvals<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Direct production editing<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Manual copying without version control<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. A defined ALM process with testing and approvals<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              A structured application lifecycle management process ensures that changes move predictably from development through testing and into production. Each stage should have clear entry and exit criteria, appropriate testing, ownership, and approval requirements. Source control and automated build or deployment processes can improve traceability and reduce manual errors. Direct production editing creates inconsistencies between environments and makes troubleshooting difficult. A consistent promotion process also helps ensure that only validated changes reach production. ALM should therefore be designed as part of the overall solution architecture rather than treated as an administrative activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 127.<\/b><\/p>\n

              A customer needs historical data for audit purposes but does not want it to affect operational performance. What should the architect consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Keeping all historical records in active transaction tables forever<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Deleting historical records immediately<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> An archival strategy that preserves authorized access<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Exporting data to personal user spreadsheets<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. An archival strategy that preserves authorized access<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Archiving can help separate rarely accessed historical information from active transactional workloads while still preserving records needed for audit, legal, or reporting purposes. The architect should consider retention periods, retrieval expectations, security, data integrity, reporting access, and deletion requirements. Archived data should remain governed and accessible to authorized users when needed. Simply deleting old records can violate retention obligations, while uncontrolled spreadsheets create security and reliability concerns. A well-designed archival approach can improve manageability and potentially reduce operational data volume without sacrificing compliance or historical traceability.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 128.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A company is concerned that a custom integration may create duplicate sales orders when requests are retried. What should the architect require?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Additional administrator accounts<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Removal of retry logic<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual review of every successful request<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Idempotency and duplicate-detection controls**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Idempotency and duplicate-detection controls<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Retry mechanisms are important for resilient integrations, but they can create duplicate business transactions if repeated requests are not handled safely. Idempotency ensures that processing the same logical request more than once does not create unintended duplicates. The design may use unique transaction identifiers, duplicate checks, or other supported controls. The architect should also include monitoring, error logging, and reconciliation procedures. Removing retries would reduce resilience, while manual review would not scale for high-volume processing. Duplicate prevention should be built into the integration architecture from the beginning.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 129.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A company wants to introduce a major configuration change during a busy operational period. What should the solution architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Assess business impact, testing needs, and deployment timing before release<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Deploy immediately because the change is configuration only<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Skip regression testing<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Allow users to make the change directly in production<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Assess business impact, testing needs, and deployment timing before release<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Configuration changes can have significant effects on business processes and should be governed similarly to code changes. The architect should assess which processes are affected, what testing is required, whether the change can be rolled back, and whether the planned deployment window creates unnecessary operational risk. Busy periods may justify postponing noncritical changes or using additional safeguards. Treating configuration as harmless can lead to production disruptions. A controlled release decision should consider both technical readiness and business timing so that the change is introduced when the organization can support it safely.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 130.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A customer wants to ensure that reporting workloads do not degrade transaction performance. What should the architect evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Whether every report can be printed<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Separating analytical workloads from transactional processing where appropriate<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Giving report users administrator rights<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Running all complex queries directly against operational transactions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Separating analytical workloads from transactional processing where appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Complex analytics can consume substantial resources and may affect operational users if heavy reporting is executed against transactional workloads. The architect should evaluate whether analytical data should be moved or replicated to an appropriate reporting platform. The decision depends on data freshness, query complexity, history requirements, user volume, and security. Operational reports may still need current Dynamics 365 data, but strategic analytics often benefit from a dedicated data layer. Separating workloads can improve scalability and performance while giving analysts greater flexibility. Reporting architecture should balance freshness with system efficiency and governance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 131.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A project team discovers that two systems both claim to be the master for vendor data. What should the solution architect do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Define authoritative ownership for the vendor data<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Allow both systems to update all fields independently<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Create additional duplicate vendor databases<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Remove synchronization controls<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Define authoritative ownership for the vendor data<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Two systems independently acting as master for the same data can create conflicting updates and unclear accountability. The architect should work with business and data owners to establish the authoritative source for vendor information, potentially at the entity or attribute level. The integration design should then define how updates flow to other systems and how conflicts are handled. Shared identifiers and validation rules are also important. Clear ownership improves data quality and reduces synchronization problems. Without governance, teams may spend significant effort reconciling inconsistent vendor records across systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 132.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A company is preparing to replace a legacy application that feeds data to five downstream systems. What should the architect do before retiring it?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Shut it down immediately after Dynamics 365 goes live<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Identify and replace all remaining downstream dependencies<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Delete the interface documentation<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Assume downstream systems will adapt automatically<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2. Identify and replace all remaining downstream dependencies<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A legacy system cannot be safely retired until all systems and processes that depend on it have been identified and addressed. The architect should create an inventory of downstream interfaces, reports, batch jobs, data extracts, and manual processes. Each dependency should be redirected, replaced, or formally retired before the legacy platform is decommissioned. Testing should confirm that replacement data flows work correctly. Overlooking a hidden dependency can cause production failures after shutdown. Decommissioning should therefore be treated as an architectural and operational activity, not simply as a server-removal task.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 133.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A company wants to improve reliability for a process that depends on several sequential batch jobs. What should the solution architect include?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> No monitoring because batches run automatically<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Random scheduling of each job<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Dependency tracking, alerts, and recovery procedures<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Manual database changes after every failure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 3. Dependency tracking, alerts, and recovery procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Sequential batch processes require clear dependency management because a failure in one job can invalidate or delay later steps. The architect should define execution order, expected completion times, monitoring, and what should happen if a job fails or overruns. Alerts should notify support teams when intervention is required. Recovery procedures should specify whether processing can restart from a particular step or must be rerun. This reduces uncertainty and prevents downstream processes from operating on incomplete data. Automated processing still requires operational controls to ensure that failures are detected and resolved promptly.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 134.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A customer wants to make a design decision based on a requirement that stakeholders have not yet agreed on. What should the solution architect do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Make an assumption and begin development immediately<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Select the most expensive design<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Ignore the requirement<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Clarify and validate the requirement before finalizing the architecture**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 4. Clarify and validate the requirement before finalizing the architecture<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Architecture should be based on validated requirements rather than unresolved assumptions. If stakeholders disagree about the intended business outcome, the architect should facilitate clarification and document the final decision before committing to a technical design. Premature implementation can result in rework if the requirement later changes. The architect may identify possible design options and explain their trade-offs, but the underlying business need should be confirmed. Clear requirements improve scope control, testing, acceptance criteria, and solution quality. Assumptions that cannot immediately be resolved should be explicitly documented and tracked.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 135.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A company wants faster recovery when an integration fails. What should the architect ensure is available to support teams?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Clear logs, transaction identifiers, and reprocessing procedures<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Only source code<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Shared administrator passwords<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> No error details for security reasons<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Clear logs, transaction identifiers, and reprocessing procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Support teams need enough information to identify which transactions failed, why they failed, and how they can be safely retried or corrected. Meaningful logs and transaction identifiers improve traceability across systems. Reprocessing procedures should explain how to recover failed items without creating duplicates or corrupting data. Sensitive information should be protected, but logging should not be removed entirely. Good operational design reduces mean time to recovery and avoids excessive dependence on developers. The architect should include supportability as a core integration requirement rather than considering it only after production incidents occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 136.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A company has multiple development teams working on a single Dynamics 365 solution. What practice best supports coordinated releases?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Independent production deployment by each team<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Shared release planning and dependency management<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> No common source control<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Different deployment standards for every developer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2. Shared release planning and dependency management<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  When multiple teams contribute to the same solution, changes may depend on common components, integrations, data models, or configuration. Shared release planning helps identify those dependencies and prevents incompatible changes from reaching production together. Teams should coordinate source control, testing, deployment sequencing, and rollback considerations. A common release process also improves communication and traceability. Independent production deployments without coordination can create unexpected conflicts and make troubleshooting difficult. The solution architect should encourage governance that allows parallel development while maintaining control over how changes are integrated and released.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 137.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A customer wants to reduce performance risk from a new custom feature. What should be done before production deployment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Performance testing using representative workloads<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Testing only with one transaction<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Disabling monitoring<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Waiting for users to report performance problems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Performance testing using representative workloads<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Performance testing should simulate realistic transaction volumes, concurrency, and processing patterns to determine whether the new feature behaves acceptably under expected load. Testing only a single transaction may miss issues that appear when many users or processes operate simultaneously. The architect should define performance targets and identify critical scenarios before testing begins. Results can reveal bottlenecks in code, integrations, queries, or configuration. Addressing these issues before production is less disruptive than responding after users experience poor performance. Representative workload testing is particularly important for high-volume or business-critical customizations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 138.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A company wants to change its data model after several integrations and reports have already been built. What should the architect recommend first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Make the change immediately<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Delete all existing integrations<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Perform an impact analysis across dependent components<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Ignore reporting dependencies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 3. Perform an impact analysis across dependent components<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Changes to shared data structures can affect integrations, reports, customizations, migration processes, security, and other downstream components. The architect should identify which systems and processes depend on the affected data before approving the change. This impact analysis helps estimate effort, testing scope, deployment sequencing, and risk. Some consumers may require coordinated changes to avoid production failures. Making a data-model change in isolation can create widespread issues. Architectural governance is especially important for shared entities because even small structural changes can have consequences across multiple solution components.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 139.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company is evaluating whether a low-priority feature should be included in the initial Dynamics 365 go-live. What should drive the decision?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Business value, risk, effort, and impact on critical readiness<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Whether one developer prefers the feature<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Whether the feature has the longest name<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Whether it was mentioned most recently<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. Business value, risk, effort, and impact on critical readiness<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Scope decisions should consider business value and implementation risk rather than treating every requested feature as equally important. A low-priority feature may be deferred if including it threatens testing, migration, training, or other critical go-live activities. The architect should help stakeholders understand dependencies and technical impact so they can make an informed decision. Deferral does not mean the requirement is rejected permanently; it can be planned for a later release. Prioritizing high-value, production-critical capabilities helps keep the initial deployment manageable and reduces unnecessary risk during go-live.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 140.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A Dynamics 365 project is ready for production deployment. Which condition should be confirmed before final approval?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> All project documentation has been deleted<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Every user has administrator permissions<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> All minor enhancement requests have been implemented<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Critical readiness criteria, risks, support, and cutover activities have been reviewed**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Critical readiness criteria, risks, support, and cutover activities have been reviewed<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Final production approval should be based on a comprehensive readiness review. The team should confirm that critical testing is complete, migration and cutover plans are ready, security has been validated, integrations are operational, support arrangements are established, and major risks are understood. Not every minor enhancement needs to be completed before go-live, but unresolved issues should be documented and accepted by appropriate stakeholders. Operational teams must also know how to monitor and support the solution after deployment. A formal readiness review helps ensure that the go-live decision is based on evidence rather than schedule pressure alone.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 121. A company is designing an integration between Dynamics 365 Finance and a warehouse system. The warehouse system can process messages only in the order they are received. What should the solution architect consider? Message ordering requirements in the integration design 2. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15397"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15397"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15397\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15426,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15397\/revisions\/15426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}