{"id":15399,"date":"2026-09-17T12:50:11","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15399"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:50:11","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:50:11","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part9-q161-180","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part9-q161-180\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part9 Q161-180"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full<\/b> Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 161.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company plans to introduce a new integration that will be used by several business units. What should the solution architect define before development starts?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> The integration contract, ownership, security, and support responsibilities<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> The preferred font for error messages<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The office location of each developer<\/span>
    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> A separate custom pattern for every business unit<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. The integration contract, ownership, security, and support responsibilities<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Before development begins, the integration should have a clearly defined contract that explains what data is exchanged, how messages are structured, which system owns each data element, and how failures are handled. Security requirements, authentication, monitoring, and support ownership should also be agreed. This prevents teams from making conflicting assumptions and reduces rework later. A shared integration used by several business units needs especially strong governance because changes can affect multiple consumers. Clear contracts and responsibilities improve maintainability, testing, and operational support throughout the solution lifecycle.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 162.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A customer wants to reduce the risk of data migration errors. Which action should the project team perform before final cutover?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Disable all validation rules<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Execute multiple migration rehearsals and reconcile results<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Delete the legacy system before testing<\/span>
      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Load data without transformation rules<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Execute multiple migration rehearsals and reconcile results<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Migration rehearsals help validate the complete process before production cutover. The team can test extraction, transformation, sequencing, loading, error handling, and expected duration using realistic data volumes. Reconciliation should verify record counts, balances, key relationships, and business-specific control totals. Repeated rehearsals also help refine timing and identify hidden dependencies. Disabling validation or deleting source systems too early introduces unnecessary risk. A repeatable and proven migration process gives stakeholders greater confidence that production data will be transferred accurately and within the planned cutover window.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 163.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A company needs a custom feature that processes large transaction volumes. What should the solution architect require before approving the design?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Only a functional prototype<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> A user-interface mockup<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Performance and scalability validation<\/span>
        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Manual testing with one transaction<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Performance and scalability validation<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        A feature that processes large volumes must be evaluated for more than functional correctness. The architect should confirm that the design can handle expected and peak workloads within acceptable processing times. Performance testing should use representative data, concurrency, and batch patterns. The review should also consider integration impact, database activity, error handling, and operational monitoring. A design that works with a few records may fail under production load. Validating scalability before approval helps prevent bottlenecks and reduces the risk of expensive redesign after the solution has already been deployed.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 164.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A business process needs an immediate response from an external system before a user can continue. Which integration approach is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Monthly batch processing<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Manual file exchange<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Delayed asynchronous processing only<\/span>
          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> A synchronous request-response pattern**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. A synchronous request-response pattern<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          A synchronous pattern is appropriate when the business process cannot continue without an immediate response. The architect should still consider timeout behavior, external service availability, authentication, performance, and what happens if the response cannot be obtained. Synchronous dependencies can affect user experience and resilience, so they should be used only when the business truly requires real-time confirmation. If a delay is acceptable, asynchronous processing may be more robust. In this scenario, the user’s workflow explicitly depends on an immediate result, making synchronous request-response the most suitable architectural pattern.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 165.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A project has several teams creating Dynamics 365 extensions. What should the solution architect establish to improve consistency?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Common development standards and review checkpoints<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Independent coding rules for every developer<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Direct changes to standard Microsoft code<\/span>
            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> No documentation requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Common development standards and review checkpoints<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Common standards help teams create extensions that follow consistent patterns for naming, security, performance, error handling, and maintainability. Review checkpoints allow the architect to detect unsupported approaches or duplicate functionality before development progresses too far. Standards should also address integration, logging, testing, and deployment practices. Without shared guidance, teams may produce incompatible designs that are difficult to support. Governance should be practical and focused on high-impact areas. Consistent development practices improve long-term maintainability and reduce technical debt across the Dynamics 365 solution.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 166.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A company wants users to see only data associated with the legal entities they support. What should the architect configure?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Full global access<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Appropriate organization-based security restrictions<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Shared administrator accounts<\/span>
              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Anonymous access to financial records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. Appropriate organization-based security restrictions<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Organization-based security can help restrict users to the legal entities or organizational units relevant to their responsibilities. The architect should combine these restrictions with role-based permissions so users can perform required tasks without receiving unnecessary access elsewhere. This supports least privilege and reduces the risk of accidental or unauthorized exposure of data. Security testing should validate both positive access and denied access for representative user personas. Shared or unrestricted accounts undermine accountability and make organizational restrictions difficult to enforce. Security should reflect both functional duties and organizational scope.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 167.<\/b><\/p>\n

              A company wants to prevent one person from creating a vendor and approving payments to that same vendor. What should the architect apply?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Shared credentials<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Full administrator access<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Segregation of duties<\/span>
                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Anonymous approval access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Segregation of duties<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Segregation of duties reduces the risk that a single user can perform conflicting responsibilities that could enable fraud or unauthorized transactions. Vendor creation and payment approval are a common example of activities that organizations may want separated. The architect should work with business and compliance stakeholders to identify critical conflicts and design security roles accordingly. Exceptions, if required, should be formally approved and monitored. Segregation of duties works alongside least privilege to strengthen internal controls. It should be validated before go-live using realistic user-role combinations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 168.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A company has a nightly interface that occasionally processes the same message twice. What should the architect add to the design?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> More administrator accounts<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Manual review of every transaction<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Removal of retries<\/span>
                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Idempotency and duplicate-detection logic**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Idempotency and duplicate-detection logic<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Retrying messages is common in resilient integrations, but repeated delivery should not create duplicate business transactions. Idempotent processing ensures that the same logical message can be handled more than once without unintended duplication. Unique identifiers, duplicate checks, or transaction keys can be used to recognize previously processed requests. The design should also retain appropriate logging and monitoring so support teams can investigate unusual behavior. Removing retries would reduce reliability, while manually checking every transaction does not scale. Duplicate protection should be a fundamental part of integration design.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 169.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A company wants to retire an old ERP system after moving to Dynamics 365. What should happen before decommissioning?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Confirm that all dependencies, retention needs, and archival requirements are addressed<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Delete the old system immediately after go-live<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Remove all historical records<\/span>
                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Assume downstream systems no longer use it<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Confirm that all dependencies, retention needs, and archival requirements are addressed<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A legacy system should not be retired until the organization confirms that no required business processes, integrations, reports, or users still depend on it. Historical information may also need to remain accessible for audit, compliance, tax, or customer-service purposes. The decommissioning plan should therefore include dependency analysis, archival strategy, data retention, security, and business sign-off. Testing should confirm that replacement interfaces are functioning correctly. Premature shutdown can cause unexpected production failures or loss of access to important records. Decommissioning should be treated as a controlled architectural activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 170.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A company wants to ensure that critical business processes are not slowed by complex analytics. What should the solution architect consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Running every analytical query directly against transactions<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Separating analytical workloads from operational processing where appropriate<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Giving analysts administrator access<\/span>
                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Disabling reporting entirely<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Separating analytical workloads from operational processing where appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Heavy analytical workloads can consume resources that are needed for transactional processing. The architect should evaluate whether reporting and analytics should use a separate data layer, replicated data, or another supported analytical platform. The appropriate approach depends on data freshness requirements, query complexity, history, user volume, and security. Operational reports may still need current transactional data, but strategic analytics often benefit from separation. This design can improve performance and scalability while giving analysts greater flexibility. Reporting architecture should balance responsiveness, freshness, governance, and system efficiency.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 171.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A project team wants to verify that a major change does not break existing functionality. Which testing type is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Regression testing<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Visual testing only<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Testing only after deployment<\/span>
                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> No testing for configuration changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Regression testing<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Regression testing confirms that existing functionality still works after changes are introduced. This is important because a new customization, configuration change, integration update, or platform release can unintentionally affect processes that previously worked correctly. The scope should be based on impact analysis and should focus on critical and frequently used scenarios. Automated regression tests can improve repeatability and speed for stable processes. Regression testing complements other testing types such as functional, integration, performance, and user acceptance testing. Performing it before production reduces the risk of unexpected business disruption.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 172.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A company wants to prevent unauthorized changes to production configuration. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Give all users configuration access<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Restrict privileged permissions and use formal change control<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Share administrator credentials<\/span>
                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Disable audit capabilities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2. Restrict privileged permissions and use formal change control<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Production configuration should be protected by least-privilege access and a controlled change process. Only authorized personnel should be able to make high-impact changes, and those changes should be documented, tested, approved, and deployed through established procedures. Shared credentials make accountability difficult and should be avoided. Audit capabilities can provide additional traceability. Where practical, configuration should be promoted from non-production environments rather than entered directly in production. Strong privileged-access controls help prevent accidental or unauthorized changes and improve the overall stability of the Dynamics 365 solution.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 173.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A customer wants to standardize business processes globally but must support some local statutory differences. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> A separate unrelated solution for every country<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Ignoring local statutory requirements<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> A global template with governed local variations<\/span>
                            \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Unlimited local customization without review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 3. A global template with governed local variations<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A global template provides a consistent foundation for common processes, data, integrations, security, and reporting. Local variations should be introduced only when justified by regulatory, statutory, tax, or legitimate business requirements. These differences should be documented and governed so the overall architecture remains manageable. Fully independent country implementations can increase cost and maintenance complexity, while forcing identical processes everywhere may create compliance problems. A balanced approach allows the organization to benefit from standardization while still supporting necessary local requirements within a controlled framework.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 174.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A company wants to improve recovery from failed integrations. Which capability should the architect include?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> No error logs<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Deleting failed messages automatically<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Manual database changes only<\/span>
                              \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Reprocessing procedures with monitoring and transaction traceability**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 4. Reprocessing procedures with monitoring and transaction traceability<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Integration failures should be recoverable without requiring uncontrolled manual intervention. The architecture should provide clear transaction identifiers, meaningful logs, monitoring, and documented reprocessing procedures. These capabilities help support teams determine what failed, correct the underlying issue, and safely retry the transaction. Duplicate protection is also important when messages are reprocessed. Automatically deleting failed transactions can cause data loss, while direct database changes introduce supportability and integrity risks. Recovery should be designed and tested before production so operations teams can respond quickly when failures occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 175.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A company wants to ensure that a new customization remains compatible with future Dynamics 365 updates. What should the architect emphasize?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Supported extension patterns<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Direct modification of Microsoft source code<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Disabling future updates<\/span>
                                \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Unsupported database changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Supported extension patterns<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Supported extension patterns are designed to minimize interference with standard application components and reduce the risk of future update conflicts. The architect should ensure that custom functionality follows documented platform practices and avoids direct modification of Microsoft code or unsupported database structures. Automated regression testing can further help identify compatibility issues when updates are introduced. Designing for upgradeability from the beginning reduces long-term maintenance effort and makes it easier for the organization to adopt new platform capabilities. Supportability should be considered an important architectural quality alongside functional requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 176.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A customer wants to decide whether a proposed feature should be included in the first release. What should drive the decision?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> The developer’s preference<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Business value, risk, dependencies, and implementation effort<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> The length of the feature name<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Whether the feature was requested most recently<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2. Business value, risk, dependencies, and implementation effort<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Release scope should be prioritized based on business value and delivery risk. The architect should help stakeholders understand how a feature affects dependencies, testing, migration, integrations, security, and overall readiness. A feature with limited value but significant complexity may be better deferred to a later release, especially if it threatens critical go-live activities. Conversely, some complex features may be essential for compliance or core operations. A structured prioritization process helps the organization focus resources on the capabilities that matter most while keeping the initial deployment manageable.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 177.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A company wants to reduce confusion when supporting a complex solution after go-live. What should the architect ensure is documented?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Support ownership, system dependencies, escalation paths, and recovery procedures<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Only the names of the development team<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Personal preferences of support staff<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Only user-interface screenshots<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Support ownership, system dependencies, escalation paths, and recovery procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Support teams need clear operational documentation to understand how the solution works and who is responsible for each component. This includes system dependencies, integration flows, monitoring points, common failure scenarios, recovery procedures, and escalation paths. Ownership should be explicit so incidents can be assigned quickly. Documentation should also identify third-party or external-system dependencies where relevant. Good operational documentation reduces reliance on individual developers and shortens incident resolution time. Supportability should be planned during implementation rather than left until after the solution has entered production.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 178.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A company is concerned about sensitive production data being copied into test environments. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Remove all test environments<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Use appropriate masking, anonymization, and access controls<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Give unrestricted access to all developers<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Store copies on personal devices<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2. Use appropriate masking, anonymization, and access controls<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Production data may contain financial, personal, or commercially sensitive information that requires protection even when used for testing. The architect should evaluate whether data masking or anonymization is required before copying information into non-production environments. Access should be limited to users with legitimate needs, and organizational privacy and retention requirements should still be followed. Test environments should not become uncontrolled repositories of sensitive information. A secure environment strategy protects data throughout the application lifecycle while still providing teams with realistic information for development and testing when necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 179.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company is changing a shared API used by several applications. What should the solution architect do before approving the release?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Test only the application requesting the change<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Ignore downstream consumers<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Assess all dependent consumers and perform regression testing<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Disable monitoring during deployment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3. Assess all dependent consumers and perform regression testing<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Changes to a shared API can affect every application that depends on its contract, behavior, authentication, schema, or timing. The architect should identify all consumers and determine whether the proposed change is backward compatible. Regression testing should validate critical dependent scenarios. Versioning may be appropriate when consumers cannot all move to the new contract simultaneously. Testing only the requesting application can leave hidden failures elsewhere. Shared services require strong change governance because a seemingly small modification can have widespread impact across the enterprise solution landscape.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 180.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A Dynamics 365 project is preparing for go-live. Which action should occur immediately before final production approval?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Delete unresolved issues from the tracking system<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 2.<\/b> Give all users administrator access<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 3.<\/b> Skip business validation if technical testing passed<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span> 4.<\/b> Conduct a formal readiness review of critical business and technical criteria**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Conduct a formal readiness review of critical business and technical criteria<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          A formal readiness review brings together evidence from testing, migration rehearsals, security validation, integration readiness, training, support preparation, and cutover planning. Remaining risks and defects should be clearly documented, owned, and either resolved or formally accepted by appropriate stakeholders. The review should also confirm that monitoring, support, and recovery procedures are ready for production. Technical testing alone does not prove that the organization is prepared to operate the solution. A structured readiness review helps ensure that the final go-live decision is based on complete and transparent information.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 161. A company plans to introduce a new integration that will be used by several business units. What should the solution architect define before development starts? The integration contract, ownership, security, and support responsibilities 2. The preferred font for error messages 3. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15399"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15424,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15399\/revisions\/15424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}