{"id":15402,"date":"2026-09-17T12:49:34","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:49:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15402"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:49:34","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:49:34","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-240","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-240\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part12 Q221-240"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full<\/b> Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 221.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company is planning a new integration between Dynamics 365 Finance and a logistics platform. What should the solution architect identify first?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> The business process, data exchanged, ownership, and timing requirements<\/span>
    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The colors used in the logistics application<\/span>
    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The personal preferences of developers<\/span>
    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The number of training rooms<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. The business process, data exchanged, ownership, and timing requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Integration design should begin with a clear understanding of the business process and the information that must move between systems. The architect should identify the source and destination, data ownership, transaction volume, frequency, latency, and error-handling expectations. These details determine whether synchronous, asynchronous, batch, or event-driven patterns are appropriate. Security and support responsibilities should also be defined. Choosing technology before understanding the business flow can lead to unnecessary complexity or poor performance. Clear requirements provide the foundation for a scalable, reliable, and supportable integration.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 222.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A company wants to reduce the risk of unauthorized access to production administration functions. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Shared administrator credentials<\/span>
      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Controlled privileged access with least-privilege permissions<\/span>
      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Administrator rights for all project members<\/span>
      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Anonymous administrative access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Controlled privileged access with least-privilege permissions<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Privileged access should be limited to users who genuinely require administrative capabilities. The architect should apply least privilege, clear ownership, and strong accountability to production administration. Shared credentials should be avoided because they weaken traceability. Access should also be reviewed periodically and removed when responsibilities change. Where possible, administrative activities should follow approved change-management procedures. Restricting privileged access reduces the risk of accidental configuration changes, unauthorized actions, and exposure of sensitive information. Security governance should be part of the production operating model from the beginning.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 223.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A customer needs to process very large data files overnight. Which architecture is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Manual data entry by users<\/span>
        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> A synchronous request for each individual record<\/span>
        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> A batch-oriented processing approach<\/span>
        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Direct editing of production database tables<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. A batch-oriented processing approach<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Large data volumes that can be processed during a defined overnight window are generally well suited to batch-oriented processing. The architect should consider file size, transaction volume, processing duration, batching strategy, error handling, and restart capability. The design should also include monitoring and reconciliation so support teams can confirm successful completion. Individual synchronous requests may create unnecessary overhead for high-volume workloads. Performance testing with representative data should validate that the batch process can complete within the available window. The solution should be designed for efficiency, reliability, and recoverability.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 224.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A critical external service is sometimes unavailable for several minutes. Which integration design provides the best resilience when delayed processing is acceptable?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> A mandatory synchronous dependency<\/span>
          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Manual processing only<\/span>
          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> No retry capability<\/span>
          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Asynchronous queue-based processing with retries**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Asynchronous queue-based processing with retries<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          When temporary delays are acceptable, asynchronous queue-based processing can improve resilience by separating the availability of the source and destination systems. Transactions can remain safely queued while the external service is unavailable and resume automatically when it recovers. The architect should include controlled retries, monitoring, logging, and duplicate protection. This approach reduces the likelihood that a short outage will disrupt the entire business process. Synchronous communication is better suited to scenarios requiring an immediate response, but it creates a stronger runtime dependency on the external system.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 225.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A company has many legacy customizations that were built several years ago. What should the architect recommend during a modernization review?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Compare them with current standard Dynamics 365 capabilities<\/span>
            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Preserve every customization automatically<\/span>
            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Add additional custom code around them<\/span>
            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable standard features that overlap<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Compare them with current standard Dynamics 365 capabilities<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Dynamics 365 evolves over time, so standard capabilities may now replace functions that previously required custom development. The architect should review each legacy customization and compare it with current product functionality. Removing unnecessary customizations can reduce technical debt, regression testing, maintenance effort, and upgrade risk. The review should still consider dependencies, business value, data impact, and user processes before any component is retired. Custom functionality that remains necessary can be retained using supported extension patterns. Modernization should focus on simplifying the solution while preserving required business outcomes.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 226.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A company wants all releases to be traceable from business requirement to production deployment. What should the ALM strategy include?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Untracked manual deployments<\/span>
              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Linked requirements, source changes, builds, tests, and releases<\/span>
              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Shared developer accounts<\/span>
              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Direct production changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. Linked requirements, source changes, builds, tests, and releases<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              End-to-end traceability helps teams understand why a change was introduced, how it was implemented, what testing was completed, and when it reached production. The ALM process should connect work items or business requirements to source control, builds, test results, approvals, and deployment records. This improves governance and makes troubleshooting easier when production issues occur. Direct manual changes break traceability and can create configuration drift between environments. A disciplined lifecycle process provides accountability and supports repeatable, controlled releases across the Dynamics 365 environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 227.<\/b><\/p>\n

              A company wants to prevent users from combining conflicting responsibilities in the finance process. What should the architect review?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Office attendance records<\/span>
                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> User display settings<\/span>
                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Segregation-of-duties conflicts<\/span>
                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Personal productivity preferences<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Segregation-of-duties conflicts<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Segregation of duties is designed to prevent one person from holding combinations of permissions that create financial or compliance risk. The architect should identify critical conflicts, such as creating vendors and approving payments, and ensure security roles are structured appropriately. Business and compliance stakeholders should participate in defining which combinations are unacceptable. Exceptions should be documented, approved, and monitored. This approach complements least privilege and strengthens internal control. Reviewing role combinations before go-live reduces the risk of inappropriate access and makes security governance more effective.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 228.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A company is planning to archive older transactions. Which requirement should the architect evaluate most carefully?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> The preferred archive folder color<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Employee training schedules<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> The age of user devices<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Legal retention, reporting, retrieval, and security requirements**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Legal retention, reporting, retrieval, and security requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Archival decisions should be based on business and regulatory needs rather than convenience alone. The architect should determine how long data must be retained, who needs access, how quickly it must be retrieved, and whether archived records are required for reporting or audit. Security controls should continue to protect sensitive information after it leaves active transaction processing. The design should also define eventual disposal when retention periods expire. A well-planned archival strategy can reduce operational data volume while ensuring that historical information remains accessible and governed for as long as required.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 229.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A customer wants to improve supportability for custom integrations. What should the architect require?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Monitoring, logging, runbooks, and clear support ownership<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Developer knowledge only<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> No operational documentation<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Manual database access as the primary support method<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Monitoring, logging, runbooks, and clear support ownership<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A production integration should be designed so support teams can identify, diagnose, and recover from common failures without depending entirely on developers. Monitoring should detect failed or delayed transactions, logs should provide useful diagnostic details, and runbooks should document common recovery procedures. Ownership and escalation paths should be clearly assigned. These capabilities reduce incident resolution time and improve operational reliability. Supportability should be included in the design from the beginning rather than added after go-live. Well-documented integrations are easier to maintain and troubleshoot throughout their lifecycle.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 230.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A company wants to protect transactional performance from complex business intelligence queries. What should the architect consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Giving all analysts system administrator access<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Separating analytics workloads from operational processing<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Running every complex query on active transaction tables<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Removing reporting capabilities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Separating analytics workloads from operational processing<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Complex analytical queries can compete with transaction processing for resources. The architect should evaluate whether analytical data should be replicated or moved to an appropriate reporting or data platform. The correct design depends on data freshness, reporting volume, history, security, and transformation requirements. Operational reporting may still use current transactional data, but heavy strategic analytics often benefit from separation. This can improve both user experience and scalability. The objective is to provide reliable reporting without unnecessarily degrading the performance of business-critical Dynamics 365 transactions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 231.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A project team identifies a requirement that affects multiple integrations, reports, and custom extensions. What should the solution architect do first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Perform a cross-component impact assessment<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Implement the change immediately<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Review only the user interface<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Ignore dependent systems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Perform a cross-component impact assessment<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A requirement that spans several technical areas can have broad downstream consequences. The architect should identify affected integrations, data structures, reports, security roles, extensions, and operational processes before approving the design. Impact analysis helps estimate effort, define testing scope, identify dependencies, and plan deployment sequencing. Without it, a seemingly small change can cause failures in unrelated areas. This analysis also allows stakeholders to understand the full cost and risk of the requirement. Cross-component governance is especially important in complex enterprise Dynamics 365 environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 232.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A customer needs an immediate credit decision from an external service before confirming an order. Which integration pattern is most suitable?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Monthly batch integration<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Deferred queue processing only<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Manual review of every order<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Synchronous request-response integration**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 4. Synchronous request-response integration<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          If an order cannot be confirmed until a credit decision is returned, the business process requires an immediate response. A synchronous request-response pattern is therefore appropriate. The architect should still design for timeouts, authentication, availability, and user experience if the external service is unavailable. Because synchronous patterns create direct runtime dependencies, they should be used only when the process truly requires immediate confirmation. Where possible, fallback or exception procedures should be defined. The architecture should balance business responsiveness with resilience and operational risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 233.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A company wants to ensure that master data remains consistent across applications. What should the architect establish?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Common identifiers, ownership, and synchronization rules<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Separate definitions in every system<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Duplicate master records by default<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> No validation standards<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. Common identifiers, ownership, and synchronization rules<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Consistent master data depends on clear ownership, shared identifiers, and well-defined synchronization behavior. The architect should establish which system is authoritative for each entity or attribute and how updates are distributed. Validation rules and duplicate-detection policies should also be considered. Without governance, systems may create conflicting versions of customers, products, or vendors, leading to reporting and operational issues. Common definitions and synchronization standards improve data quality and make integration behavior more predictable. Master data governance should be treated as an enterprise architecture concern, not only a technical integration issue.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 234.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A company wants to reduce deployment errors caused by manual steps. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> More manual copying between environments<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Controlled deployment automation where appropriate<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Direct developer access to production<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Removing source control<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2. Controlled deployment automation where appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Deployment automation can reduce repetitive manual steps and improve consistency across environments. The architect should integrate automation with source control, testing, approvals, and release governance so only validated changes are promoted. Automated processes can also provide better traceability by recording which version was deployed and when. Manual deployment remains necessary in some scenarios, but it should be minimized where repeatable automation is practical. Direct production editing increases risk and can create environment drift. A controlled automated pipeline supports more reliable and predictable releases.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 235.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A company wants to validate that users can perform only the functions required by their jobs. What should be tested?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Representative security roles and user personas<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Only system administrator access<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> One shared account for all departments<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Security disabled temporarily<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Representative security roles and user personas<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Security testing should verify that real user personas have the correct level of access. Users must be able to complete required tasks while being prevented from performing unauthorized actions or viewing restricted data. The test should consider functional permissions, legal-entity scope, sensitive information, and segregation-of-duties conflicts. Testing only with administrator accounts cannot validate least privilege. Representative role testing before go-live reduces both security risk and operational issues caused by missing permissions. It also provides evidence that the intended security model works as designed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 236.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A company wants to reduce the risk of a shared API change affecting existing consumers. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Change the contract without notice<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Test only the newest consumer<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Use impact analysis, compatibility planning, and regression testing<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable monitoring during release<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 3. Use impact analysis, compatibility planning, and regression testing<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Shared APIs can have many dependent applications, so contract changes must be managed carefully. The architect should identify all consumers, evaluate whether the change is backward compatible, and determine whether versioning is required. Regression testing should validate critical scenarios for existing consumers. Communication and coordinated release planning may also be needed. Changing a shared interface without understanding dependencies can cause widespread failures. Strong API governance helps preserve stability while still allowing the service to evolve. Compatibility planning is especially important when consumers cannot all update at the same time.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 237.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A company wants to improve confidence in frequent releases. Which practice should the architect promote?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Automated regression testing for stable critical processes<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Testing only after production deployment<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Eliminating regression testing<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Relying entirely on user-reported defects<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Automated regression testing for stable critical processes<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Automated regression testing provides repeatable validation of important business processes each time a release is prepared. Stable, high-value scenarios are strong candidates because they are executed frequently and can be tested consistently. Automation does not replace all manual testing, but it can reduce effort and help identify unintended changes earlier. The test suite should be maintained as business processes evolve. A strong regression capability supports faster releases while reducing the risk that new changes will break existing functionality. This is especially valuable in continuously evolving Dynamics 365 environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 238.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A company wants to reduce the impact of temporary external service outages. Which design principle should the architect apply where business timing allows?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Increase synchronous dependencies<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Use asynchronous decoupling and resilient processing<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove monitoring<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Require manual transactions only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2. Use asynchronous decoupling and resilient processing<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Asynchronous decoupling can prevent temporary outages in one system from immediately stopping another. Transactions can be queued and processed when the dependent service becomes available. The design should include retries, monitoring, duplicate protection, and recovery procedures. This approach is appropriate when the business can tolerate some delay. If an immediate response is required, synchronous integration may still be necessary. The architect should select the pattern based on latency requirements rather than applying one model universally. Resilient processing reduces failure propagation and improves overall system availability.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 239.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company is preparing to decommission a legacy system. What should the architect verify before shutdown?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> All dependencies, historical-data needs, and replacement interfaces are addressed<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> The system is visually outdated<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> All historical data has been deleted<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Users have stopped discussing the old system<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. All dependencies, historical-data needs, and replacement interfaces are addressed<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Legacy-system retirement requires more than switching off the application. The architect should identify every downstream integration, report, batch process, and user dependency. Historical data must be migrated, archived, or retained according to business and regulatory requirements. Replacement interfaces should be tested before shutdown, and appropriate stakeholders should approve the decommissioning plan. Hidden dependencies can cause serious production problems if the system is retired prematurely. A structured retirement process reduces operational risk and ensures that required data remains available after the old platform is removed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 240.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A Dynamics 365 project has completed development and testing. What should happen before final go-live approval?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Delete all open risks<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Give all users administrator permissions<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Skip readiness review because testing passed<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Conduct a formal readiness review covering business and technical criteria**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Conduct a formal readiness review covering business and technical criteria<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          A formal readiness review confirms that the organization is prepared to operate the solution in production. The review should cover testing results, migration readiness, security, integrations, cutover activities, user training, support arrangements, monitoring, and unresolved risks. Remaining issues should be owned, understood, and either resolved or formally accepted. Technical testing alone does not prove that business operations and support teams are ready. A structured go-live review provides a final opportunity to identify missing dependencies and ensures that production approval is based on complete evidence rather than schedule pressure.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 221. A company is planning a new integration between Dynamics 365 Finance and a logistics platform. What should the solution architect identify first? The business process, data exchanged, ownership, and timing requirements 2. The colors used in the logistics application 3. The personal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15402"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15402"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15421,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15402\/revisions\/15421"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}