{"id":15409,"date":"2026-09-17T12:48:34","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:48:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15409"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:48:34","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:48:34","slug":"microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part18-q341-360","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-mb-700-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part18-q341-360\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft MB-700 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part18 Q341-360"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full<\/b> Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps <\/b><\/a>and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 341.<\/b><\/p>\n

A company wants to ensure that a Dynamics 365 integration does not overwhelm an external service during peak processing periods. What should the solution architect include?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Throttling, batching, and controlled concurrency<\/span>
    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Unlimited parallel requests<\/span>
    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> No retry limits<\/span>
    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Manual transaction entry only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. Throttling, batching, and controlled concurrency<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    External services often impose limits on request volume or concurrency. The architect should design the integration so it respects those constraints while still meeting business throughput requirements. Throttling can regulate request rates, batching can reduce overhead, and controlled concurrency can prevent sudden spikes from overwhelming the receiving system. Retry behavior should also be designed carefully so failures do not create additional pressure. Performance testing should validate the approach under realistic workloads. Ignoring service limits can result in rejected requests, cascading failures, or degraded performance across the broader business process.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 342.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A company wants to ensure that production changes are linked to approved business requirements. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Untracked manual deployments<\/span>
      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Traceability between work items, changes, tests, and releases<\/span>
      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Shared administrator accounts<\/span>
      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Direct editing in production<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Traceability between work items, changes, tests, and releases<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Traceability helps the organization understand why a change was made, how it was implemented, what testing was completed, and when it reached production. The ALM process should connect business requirements or work items to source changes, builds, test results, approvals, and deployment records. This improves governance and troubleshooting. If a production issue occurs, teams can quickly identify the associated change. Direct production editing weakens traceability and can create environment drift. A structured lifecycle process provides better accountability and supports controlled, repeatable releases.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 343.<\/b><\/p>\n

      A company is planning a global rollout and wants all regions to use a common chart of accounts wherever possible. What should the solution architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> A completely different financial structure in every region<\/span>
        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> No governance over local finance configuration<\/span>
        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> A global financial design with controlled local exceptions<\/span>
        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Custom code for every legal entity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. A global financial design with controlled local exceptions<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        A common financial design can improve consistency across regions and simplify reporting, integration, and support. However, legitimate local statutory or regulatory requirements may require controlled differences. The architect should establish a global template and govern any local exceptions so they are documented and justified. This approach reduces unnecessary variation while still supporting compliance. Completely separate designs can increase complexity and make consolidation more difficult. Standardization should therefore be balanced with the need to support valid local legal and operational requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 344.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A critical integration can tolerate a short delay but must never lose transactions. Which design is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Synchronous processing without retries<\/span>
          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Manual data re-entry<\/span>
          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Direct database writes<\/span>
          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Durable asynchronous messaging with retry and recovery**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Durable asynchronous messaging with retry and recovery<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Durable asynchronous messaging is well suited to scenarios where immediate processing is not required but transaction loss is unacceptable. Messages can remain queued while a dependent system is unavailable and be processed later. Retry logic, monitoring, duplicate protection, and recovery procedures should be included to ensure reliable delivery. Synchronous processing can create unnecessary dependency when a short delay is acceptable. Manual re-entry is not scalable and increases error risk. Durable messaging provides resilience and helps protect business data during temporary outages or connectivity problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 345.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A company wants to reduce the number of custom reports in its Dynamics 365 solution. What should the architect do first?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Review whether standard reporting capabilities meet the requirements<\/span>
            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Build additional custom reports<\/span>
            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Remove all reporting functionality<\/span>
            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Require manual spreadsheet reporting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Review whether standard reporting capabilities meet the requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Before creating or maintaining custom reports, the architect should determine whether existing Dynamics 365 or supported Microsoft reporting capabilities already satisfy the business need. Standard solutions generally reduce development effort, maintenance, testing, and upgrade risk. If gaps remain, the team can then evaluate extensions or additional analytics solutions. Some custom reporting will still be justified, especially for unique business or regulatory requirements. The goal is to avoid unnecessary duplication and keep the reporting architecture as simple and maintainable as possible.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 346.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A company wants to ensure that users cannot see sensitive data outside the legal entities they support. What should the security model include?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Full global access<\/span>
              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Organization-based restrictions combined with role-based security<\/span>
              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Shared administrator accounts<\/span>
              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Anonymous reporting access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. Organization-based restrictions combined with role-based security<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Security should control both what users can do and where they can do it. Organization-based restrictions can limit users to the legal entities relevant to their responsibilities, while role-based permissions control the functions they can perform. This supports least privilege and helps protect sensitive information from unnecessary exposure. The architect should also consider reporting access and segregation-of-duties conflicts. Representative user testing should verify that legal-entity boundaries are enforced correctly before go-live. Shared or unrestricted accounts would weaken these controls and reduce accountability.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 347.<\/b><\/p>\n

              A company is migrating data from several legacy systems with different customer identifiers. What should the architect address before migration?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Office device standards<\/span>
                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Report color preferences<\/span>
                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Identifier mapping, deduplication, and data ownership<\/span>
                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> User training room assignments<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Identifier mapping, deduplication, and data ownership<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Different legacy systems may represent the same customer with different identifiers, which can create duplicates during migration. The architect should define matching rules, authoritative sources, identifier mappings, and deduplication procedures before loading data into Dynamics 365. Business owners should help validate which records represent the same entity. Trial migrations can then test whether the rules produce accurate results. Without this preparation, duplicate customers may affect transactions, reporting, integrations, and master-data quality. Data governance is therefore essential to a successful consolidation migration.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 348.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A company wants to prevent duplicate payments when an integration message is retried. What should the architect implement?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Manual review of every payment<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Removal of retries<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Shared user credentials<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Idempotent processing with unique transaction identifiers**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Idempotent processing with unique transaction identifiers<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Payment integrations must protect against duplicate processing because retrying the same message can have significant financial consequences. Idempotent processing allows the system to recognize when a transaction has already been handled. Unique transaction identifiers or similar controls can be used to detect repeated requests and prevent duplicate payments. Retry capability should remain available for resilience, but it must be safe. Monitoring and reconciliation should also be included. This design protects financial integrity while still allowing temporary failures to be recovered automatically.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 349.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A company wants to improve deployment consistency across several environments. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Standardized deployment processes and automation where appropriate<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Manual copying by individual developers<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Different deployment methods for every team<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Direct changes in production<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Standardized deployment processes and automation where appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Standardized deployment processes reduce variation and make releases more repeatable. Automation can help eliminate manual errors, improve traceability, and ensure that the same deployment logic is used across environments. The process should still include testing, approvals, and release governance. Direct production editing or team-specific deployment methods can create configuration drift and make troubleshooting difficult. A consistent ALM approach supports safer releases and helps teams understand exactly how changes progress from development through validation and into production.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 350.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A company wants to make sure that complex analytical workloads do not interfere with critical transactional processing. What should the architect consider?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Running all analytics in the production transaction workload<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Moving analytical workloads to an appropriate separate data platform<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disabling all reporting<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Giving analysts administrator rights<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Moving analytical workloads to an appropriate separate data platform<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Heavy analytics can consume resources needed for operational transactions. The architect should evaluate whether data should be replicated or moved to a dedicated reporting or analytics platform. The design should consider freshness, historical analysis, security, transformation, and query complexity. Some operational reporting may still use current transactional data, but strategic analytics often benefit from workload separation. This approach can improve scalability and user experience while protecting business-critical processing. Reporting architecture should balance performance with data freshness and governance needs.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 351.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A company wants to ensure that a third-party solution can be supported throughout the Dynamics 365 lifecycle. What should the architect evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Vendor support, update compatibility, security, and integration approach<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Only the product’s visual design<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Only the initial purchase cost<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Only the vendor’s office location<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Vendor support, update compatibility, security, and integration approach<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A third-party solution should be evaluated for long-term suitability as well as immediate functionality. The architect should understand the vendor’s support model, update strategy, Dynamics 365 compatibility, security practices, and integration approach. Licensing, performance, monitoring, and release cadence should also be considered. A product that cannot keep pace with platform updates may create significant maintenance risk. Lifecycle evaluation helps the organization choose a solution that fits the broader architecture and can be operated reliably over time.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 352.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A company wants to verify that finance users do not have conflicting permissions. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Full administrative access<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Shared finance accounts<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Segregation-of-duties analysis and role review<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Anonymous transaction approval<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3. Segregation-of-duties analysis and role review<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Segregation-of-duties analysis identifies permission combinations that could create fraud or control risks. The architect should review finance roles to ensure that users cannot perform incompatible tasks, such as creating a vendor and approving payments to that vendor. Business and compliance stakeholders should define the important conflicts. Any exceptions should be formally approved and monitored. This analysis should be combined with least privilege and representative security testing. Reviewing role combinations before production helps strengthen internal controls and reduce unnecessary access.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 353.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A company wants to retire a legacy system but still needs access to seven years of historical transactions. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Delete all historical records<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Keep the legacy system running forever without review<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Export data to personal spreadsheets<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Implement an appropriate archival and retrieval solution**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 4. Implement an appropriate archival and retrieval solution<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            If historical transactions remain necessary for audit, reporting, compliance, or customer service, they must remain accessible after the legacy system is retired. The architect should design an archival solution that preserves required data, security, retention, and retrieval capabilities. The archive should be tested before the old system is shut down. Keeping the legacy system indefinitely may create unnecessary cost and security risk, while spreadsheets are not suitable for controlled enterprise retention. A governed archival approach allows decommissioning while preserving access to required history.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 354.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A company wants to reduce the risk of configuration drift between environments. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Controlled promotion of approved configuration changes<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Manual production changes without documentation<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Different configuration processes in every environment<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Shared administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1. Controlled promotion of approved configuration changes<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Configuration drift occurs when environments no longer reflect the same approved state. The architect should establish a controlled process for promoting validated configuration changes through the environment lifecycle. Changes should be documented, tested, approved, and applied consistently. Direct production editing should be minimized because it can create differences that are difficult to reproduce elsewhere. Strong configuration management improves troubleshooting, release confidence, and test accuracy. Treating configuration as part of ALM helps maintain consistency across the Dynamics 365 landscape.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 355.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A company wants support teams to understand exactly where an integration failed. What should the architect include?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Correlation identifiers, diagnostic logs, and monitoring<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> No logs<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Shared administrator passwords<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Manual database searches only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Correlation identifiers, diagnostic logs, and monitoring<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Correlation identifiers can help trace a transaction across multiple systems and processing steps. Combined with meaningful diagnostic logs and monitoring, they allow support teams to determine where a failure occurred and which records were affected. This reduces troubleshooting time and improves recovery. Logs should contain enough information to support diagnosis without exposing unnecessary sensitive data. Manual database searching alone is inefficient and may not provide end-to-end visibility. Observability should be designed into integrations so operations teams can support them effectively after go-live.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 356.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A company is deciding whether to delay a complex feature until a later release. What should the solution architect evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> The length of the feature name<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Business value, dependencies, risk, and effect on go-live readiness<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Developer preference<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> The order in which it was requested<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2. Business value, dependencies, risk, and effect on go-live readiness<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Feature prioritization should consider whether the business value justifies the implementation effort and risk. The architect should evaluate dependencies, testing scope, integration impact, security, performance, and the feature’s effect on overall readiness. Deferring a low-priority complex feature can reduce go-live risk and allow the team to focus on critical capabilities. However, a complex feature may need to remain if it is required for compliance or essential operations. Structured prioritization supports informed scope decisions and protects the stability of the initial release.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 357.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A company wants to test whether a critical integration can recover after a network outage. What should the test plan include?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Simulated failures, retries, recovery, and duplicate prevention<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Successful transactions only<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> User-interface testing only<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> No testing because retries are automated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Simulated failures, retries, recovery, and duplicate prevention<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Resilience testing should simulate real-world failure conditions such as network outages, timeouts, and unavailable endpoints. The team should verify that retries occur correctly, transactions are not lost, duplicate records are prevented, and processing resumes after service restoration. Monitoring and alerts should also be tested. Successful-path testing alone cannot demonstrate that the integration will recover safely from failures. Validating recovery procedures before production helps reduce operational risk and provides confidence that support teams can respond effectively when outages occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 358.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A company wants to use production-like data in testing while protecting personal information. What should the architect recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Use unrestricted production copies<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Apply masking or anonymization with appropriate access controls<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable security in test environments<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Store data on personal devices<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2. Apply masking or anonymization with appropriate access controls<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Production-like data can improve test realism, but sensitive personal or commercial information should remain protected. The architect should assess whether masking or anonymization is required and restrict access to users with legitimate needs. Data retention and disposal should also follow organizational policy. Test environments should not become an uncontrolled source of sensitive information. Appropriate protection allows teams to validate realistic scenarios while reducing privacy and security risk. Data governance applies throughout the application lifecycle, not only in production.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 359.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A company plans to change a shared message schema used by several integrations. What should the architect do first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Change the schema immediately<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Ignore existing consumers<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Perform impact analysis and compatibility assessment<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Remove regression testing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3. Perform impact analysis and compatibility assessment<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A shared message schema may be consumed by multiple systems, so changes can have widespread impact. The architect should identify all consumers and determine whether the proposed change is backward compatible. Regression testing, versioning, and coordinated deployment may be required. Changing the schema without understanding dependencies can cause integration failures across multiple business processes. Strong governance around shared contracts helps services evolve while protecting existing consumers. Impact analysis should therefore occur before implementation begins.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 360.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A Dynamics 365 project is ready for final go-live approval. What should be confirmed before production deployment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Every optional enhancement is delivered<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> All users have administrator permissions<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> All old issues are deleted from tracking<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Critical testing, migration, security, support, cutover, and risk criteria have been reviewed**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Critical testing, migration, security, support, cutover, and risk criteria have been reviewed<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Final go-live approval should reflect both technical and business readiness. Critical testing should be complete, migration and reconciliation plans should be validated, security should be confirmed, integrations should be operational, and support teams should be prepared. The cutover plan should include owners, timing, decision points, and contingency actions. Remaining risks and defects should be documented and formally accepted where appropriate. A structured readiness review helps ensure that production deployment proceeds based on evidence and preparedness rather than schedule pressure alone.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft MB-700 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 341. A company wants to ensure that a Dynamics 365 integration does not overwhelm an external service during peak processing periods. What should the solution architect include? Throttling, batching, and controlled concurrency 2. Unlimited parallel requests 3. No retry limits 4. Manual transaction […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15409"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15409"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15415,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15409\/revisions\/15415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}