{"id":15454,"date":"2026-09-18T05:21:54","date_gmt":"2026-09-18T05:21:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15454"},"modified":"2026-09-18T05:21:54","modified_gmt":"2026-09-18T05:21:54","slug":"amazon-aws-certified-solutions-architect-professional-sap-c02-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/amazon-aws-certified-solutions-architect-professional-sap-c02-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect &#8211; Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part11 Q201-220"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><\/h1>\n<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/aws-certified-solutions-architect-professional-sap-c02-exam-dumps\"><b>Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect &#8211; Professional SAP-C02 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 201<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs to run a containerized application without managing servers or the underlying compute infrastructure. Which AWS service is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EC2<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EKS with managed nodes<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Batch<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate allows organizations to run containers without provisioning or managing EC2 instances. Fargate handles the underlying compute infrastructure while the company defines the containers, CPU, memory, networking, and other task requirements. This model is useful when teams want the benefits of containers without managing operating systems or server capacity. EC2 requires infrastructure management, while EKS is primarily a Kubernetes service and AWS Batch targets batch computing workloads. Therefore, ECS with Fargate is the appropriate serverless container solution.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 202<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS capability allows an organization to connect its on-premises network to AWS using a dedicated private connection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Direct Connect<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NAT Gateway<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Internet Gateway<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">VPC Peering<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Direct Connect provides a dedicated network connection between an organization&#8217;s on-premises environment and AWS. It can provide more consistent network performance and avoid relying entirely on internet-based connectivity. Direct Connect can also be combined with VPN connections for additional resilience. NAT Gateway provides outbound internet access for private resources, Internet Gateway enables internet connectivity for VPC resources, and VPC Peering connects VPCs. Therefore, Direct Connect is the appropriate option when dedicated private connectivity to AWS is required.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 203<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A workload must process millions of messages asynchronously and tolerate temporary processing failures. Which service is most suitable?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon SNS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EventBridge<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon SQS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Step Functions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon SQS provides durable message queuing that allows producers and consumers to operate independently. Messages can remain in the queue until consumers successfully process them, helping applications tolerate temporary failures and traffic spikes. SQS also supports visibility timeouts and dead-letter queues for handling unsuccessful processing. SNS primarily provides publish-subscribe messaging, EventBridge routes events, and Step Functions coordinates workflows. Therefore, SQS is the most suitable service when an application needs asynchronous processing and reliable message buffering.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 204<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to encrypt sensitive data stored in Amazon S3 using keys that it controls and manages. Which option should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 SSE-S3<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Client-side encryption only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Shield<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">S3 SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon S3 SSE-KMS allows objects to be encrypted using AWS Key Management Service keys. A customer managed KMS key provides greater control over key policies, permissions, rotation settings, and usage monitoring than AWS-owned encryption mechanisms. SSE-S3 uses keys managed by Amazon S3, while Shield provides DDoS protection. Client-side encryption is another approach but requires the application to perform encryption before uploading data. Therefore, SSE-KMS with a customer managed key is appropriate when centralized control over encryption keys is required.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 205<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service is designed to run code in response to events without provisioning servers?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EC2<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Lambda<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ECS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Elastic Beanstalk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that runs code in response to events without requiring customers to provision or manage servers. Lambda can be triggered by services such as Amazon S3, EventBridge, API Gateway, and SQS. AWS manages the underlying compute infrastructure and automatically handles supported scaling requirements. EC2 requires instance management, ECS manages containers, and Elastic Beanstalk provides application deployment and environment management. Therefore, Lambda is the appropriate service for event-driven serverless application code.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 206<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company operates hundreds of AWS accounts and wants to apply centralized governance and account-level controls. Which service should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Organizations<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Cognito<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS IAM<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Resource Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Organizations provides centralized management for multiple AWS accounts. It allows companies to organize accounts into organizational units, apply service control policies, establish consolidated billing, and manage account structures centrally. IAM primarily manages identities and permissions within accounts, Cognito provides application identity management, and Resource Explorer helps locate resources. Organizations is especially useful for enterprise environments where multiple teams or business units operate separate AWS accounts. Therefore, AWS Organizations is the appropriate foundation for centralized multi-account governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 207<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An application requires a globally distributed NoSQL database with active writes in multiple AWS Regions. Which service should be selected?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Aurora Global Database<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon DynamoDB global tables<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon RDS Multi-AZ<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon ElastiCache<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon DynamoDB global tables provide a fully managed, multi-Region NoSQL database architecture with automatic replication between participating Regions. Applications can access local tables and support workloads requiring globally distributed data and multi-Region write capabilities. Aurora Global Database is designed for relational workloads, RDS Multi-AZ provides high availability within a Region, and ElastiCache is primarily an in-memory caching service. Therefore, DynamoDB global tables are appropriate for globally distributed NoSQL applications requiring multi-Region data replication.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 208<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can analyze application code and dependencies to identify potential software vulnerabilities?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Macie<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Config<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon GuardDuty<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector is a vulnerability management service that can assess supported AWS workloads for software vulnerabilities and unintended network exposure. It can evaluate EC2 instances, container images, and supported Lambda functions to identify security issues. Macie focuses on sensitive data discovery, Config evaluates resource configurations, and GuardDuty provides threat detection. Inspector is therefore appropriate when an organization needs vulnerability findings related to software packages, workloads, or container images rather than detecting active threats.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 209<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs to transfer an on-premises relational database to Amazon Aurora while keeping application downtime as low as possible. Which service should be considered?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Database Migration Service<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS DataSync<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Snowball<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Transfer Family<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Database Migration Service can migrate supported databases to AWS while minimizing application downtime. DMS can perform an initial data load and then continue replicating changes from the source database, allowing the destination to remain synchronized before the final cutover. DataSync is designed primarily for file and object data transfers, Snowball provides physical data transfer appliances, and Transfer Family supports managed file-transfer protocols. Therefore, AWS DMS is the appropriate service for low-downtime database migration.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 210<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service provides a centralized dashboard for security findings from multiple AWS security services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Detective<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Security Hub<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Audit Manager<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Security Hub provides centralized security findings and security posture information across an AWS environment. It can aggregate findings from services such as GuardDuty, Inspector, and Macie, allowing security teams to review issues from a central location. Detective helps investigate security findings, Inspector focuses on vulnerability assessment, and Audit Manager helps collect evidence for audits. Therefore, Security Hub is the appropriate service when an organization wants centralized visibility into security findings from multiple AWS services.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 211<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to automatically scale EC2 instances based on CPU utilization. Which feature should be configured?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudFormation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EC2 Auto Scaling<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Systems Manager<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Config<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EC2 Auto Scaling can automatically adjust the number of EC2 instances based on demand. A target tracking scaling policy can maintain a desired metric value, such as average CPU utilization, by adding or removing instances. This allows applications to respond automatically to changing workloads while avoiding unnecessary fixed capacity. CloudFormation provisions infrastructure, Systems Manager manages operational tasks, and Config evaluates configurations. Therefore, EC2 Auto Scaling with an appropriate scaling policy is the correct solution for CPU-based automatic scaling.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 212<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service is best suited for interactive SQL queries against data stored directly in Amazon S3?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Redshift<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon OpenSearch Service<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Athena<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EMR<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows users to analyze data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. It does not require users to provision database servers or clusters for the query engine. Redshift is a data warehouse, OpenSearch is designed for search and analytics workloads, and EMR provides managed big-data frameworks such as Spark and Hadoop. Therefore, Athena is the appropriate choice when users need to run SQL queries directly against data stored in S3.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 213<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to distribute static content globally with low latency. Which AWS service should be placed in front of its origin?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon CloudFront<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Direct Connect<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Route 53 Resolver<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Transit Gateway<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon CloudFront is a global content delivery network that caches content at edge locations closer to users. It can distribute static assets such as images, videos, JavaScript, CSS, and documents while reducing latency and origin load. Direct Connect provides dedicated network connectivity, Route 53 Resolver handles DNS queries within VPC environments, and Transit Gateway connects VPCs and networks. Therefore, CloudFront is the appropriate service for globally distributing static content with lower latency.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 214<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company has an application that needs a highly durable object store for backups and archived files. Which service should be selected?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EBS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon S3<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon EFS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">EC2 Instance Store<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon S3 provides highly durable object storage and is designed for storing data such as backups, archives, documents, media, and application objects. It offers multiple storage classes so organizations can select options based on access frequency and retention requirements. EBS provides block storage for compute workloads, EFS provides managed file storage, and Instance Store provides temporary local storage tied to EC2 instances. Therefore, Amazon S3 is the appropriate service for durable object-based backup and archive storage.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 215<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can centrally manage software patches across a fleet of supported EC2 instances?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Systems Manager<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudTrail<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon CloudWatch<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager can automate patching operations across supported managed instances. Administrators can define patch baselines, schedules, and maintenance windows to apply updates consistently across fleets. This helps organizations maintain operating-system security and compliance without manually connecting to each server. Inspector identifies vulnerabilities, CloudTrail records API activity, and CloudWatch provides monitoring and metrics. Therefore, Systems Manager is the appropriate service for centralized patch management across EC2 instances.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 216<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company needs a highly available application architecture across multiple Availability Zones. Which design is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One EC2 instance in a single Availability Zone<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Multiple EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones behind a load balancer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One large EC2 instance with scheduled backups<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Multiple instances in one Availability Zone only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Deploying multiple EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones behind a load balancer improves application availability and fault tolerance. If an instance or an entire Availability Zone becomes unavailable, the load balancer can continue sending traffic to healthy instances in other Availability Zones. A single instance or single-AZ deployment creates a larger failure domain. Scheduled backups help with recovery but do not provide continuous application availability. Therefore, a multi-AZ architecture with multiple instances and load balancing is the appropriate design.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 217<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can provide temporary access to AWS resources for users authenticated through an external identity provider?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Cognito<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS IAM Identity Center<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS STS<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon GuardDuty<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Security Token Service provides temporary security credentials that can be used to access AWS resources. STS supports scenarios involving federation and role assumption, allowing users or applications to receive temporary permissions instead of long-term access keys. IAM Identity Center can provide centralized workforce access, while Cognito is primarily designed for application users. GuardDuty is a threat detection service. Therefore, AWS STS is the underlying service used when temporary credentials are required for federated or assumed-role access.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 218<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to detect sensitive information such as personally identifiable information stored in Amazon S3. Which service should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Macie<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Inspector<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS WAF<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Detective<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon Macie is designed to discover and protect sensitive data stored in Amazon S3. It can use machine learning and pattern matching to identify sensitive information, including certain types of personally identifiable information. This helps organizations understand where sensitive data exists and identify potentially risky storage configurations. Inspector focuses on workload vulnerabilities, WAF protects web applications, and Detective assists with security investigations. Therefore, Amazon Macie is the appropriate service for discovering sensitive information in S3.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 219<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which AWS service can provide centralized logging of API calls made to AWS services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon CloudWatch<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudTrail<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS Config<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Amazon OpenSearch Service<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AWS CloudTrail records API activity within AWS environments and provides information about actions performed by users, roles, and AWS services. CloudTrail events can be used for auditing, security investigations, governance, and operational troubleshooting. CloudWatch focuses on metrics, logs, and monitoring, Config records resource configurations, and OpenSearch can analyze logs but does not itself provide the primary AWS API activity recording capability. Therefore, CloudTrail is the appropriate service for centralized auditing of AWS API calls.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 220<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to deploy a new application version gradually while minimizing the impact of a potential deployment failure. Which deployment strategy is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">All-at-once deployment<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In-place deployment without testing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Canary deployment<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Manual deployment on every server<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A canary deployment releases a new application version to a small portion of users or infrastructure before expanding the deployment to the remaining environment. This allows the organization to monitor performance, errors, and user impact before committing to a full rollout. If problems are detected, the deployment can be stopped or rolled back with a smaller affected population. An all-at-once deployment exposes all users immediately, while manual deployment lacks controlled rollout mechanisms. Therefore, a canary strategy is suitable for minimizing deployment risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect &#8211; Professional SAP-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 201 A company needs to run a containerized application without managing servers or the underlying compute infrastructure. Which AWS service is most appropriate? Amazon EC2 Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate Amazon EKS with managed nodes AWS Batch [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15454"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15454"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15477,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15454\/revisions\/15477"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}