{"id":15804,"date":"2026-09-18T09:44:16","date_gmt":"2026-09-18T09:44:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=15804"},"modified":"2026-09-18T09:44:16","modified_gmt":"2026-09-18T09:44:16","slug":"microsoft-sc-200-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-sc-200-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft SC-200 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part7 Q121-140"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><\/h1>\n<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/sc-200-exam-dumps\"><b>Microsoft SC-200 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 121<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender XDR capability can automatically disrupt certain attacks by taking predefined response actions against compromised entities?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat analytics<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automatic attack disruption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure Score<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automatic attack disruption is a Microsoft Defender XDR capability designed to help contain certain active attacks by taking supported automated response actions. Depending on the detected attack and available signals, actions can include disrupting compromised accounts or devices to limit attacker activity. The capability uses signals across Microsoft security products to identify high-confidence attack activity. Security teams should understand which scenarios and actions are supported in their environment. Analysts should still investigate the incident afterward to determine the attack path, affected resources, and required remediation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 122<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An analyst needs to investigate a suspicious PowerShell process and determine what other activities occurred around the same time on the endpoint. Which capability is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device timeline<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure Score<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content hub<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat analytics<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device timeline provides chronological information about activity occurring on a device. An analyst investigating a suspicious PowerShell process can use the timeline to examine related processes, files, network connections, and other events before and after the PowerShell execution. This can help establish the sequence of activity and identify additional indicators of compromise. Reviewing surrounding events is important because a single suspicious process may be part of a larger attack chain. Analysts should correlate timeline evidence with alerts and other available security telemetry.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 123<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender for Endpoint capability allows analysts to search security telemetry proactively using KQL?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device isolation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automated investigation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Exposure management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting enables analysts to proactively search security telemetry using KQL. It can be used to investigate suspicious processes, network activity, files, users, devices, and other supported security data. Analysts can create queries based on indicators or hypotheses and search for activity that may not have generated an existing alert. Advanced hunting is especially useful for threat hunting and detection development. Analysts should understand the available tables and fields before writing queries and should use appropriate time ranges to avoid unnecessary processing and improve investigation efficiency.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 124<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender for Office 365 capability helps protect users from malicious URLs by checking links when users access them?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Safe Attachments<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Safe Links<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attack simulation training<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Safe Links helps protect users from malicious or suspicious URLs delivered through supported Microsoft 365 communication channels. Depending on the organization&#8217;s policy configuration, links can be checked when users interact with them, helping prevent access to known malicious destinations. Safe Links is focused on URL protection, whereas Safe Attachments addresses potentially harmful files. Analysts investigating a suspicious email can use Defender for Office 365 investigation capabilities to determine how a URL was delivered and whether other users received the same message. Policy configuration determines the exact protection behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 125<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Sentinel capability can trigger an automated workflow when an incident meets specified conditions?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Workbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Watchlist<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automation rule<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data connector<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automation rules in Microsoft Sentinel can evaluate conditions associated with incidents and perform configured actions when those conditions are met. An automation rule can help standardize incident management by assigning incidents, changing their status, adding tags, or invoking other supported actions. Automation rules can also work with playbooks to create broader response workflows. Security teams should carefully define conditions to prevent actions from being applied to unrelated incidents. Regular testing and monitoring help ensure that automated incident handling continues to behave as intended.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 126<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Sentinel feature can be used to compare security events against a regularly maintained list of organizational values?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Watchlist<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Workbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Playbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Incident<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Microsoft Sentinel watchlist stores reference data that can be used in queries and investigations. Organizations can maintain values such as approved accounts, known IP addresses, critical assets, or other information and compare event data against the list. This makes watchlists useful for security monitoring and organization-specific detection scenarios. Analysts can reference watchlist data in KQL queries without repeatedly embedding the same values directly into query logic. Watchlists should be maintained regularly because outdated reference data can reduce detection accuracy or generate unnecessary investigation results.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 127<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the primary purpose of Microsoft Defender for Identity sensors?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To create Sentinel workbooks<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To collect identity-related signals from supported Active Directory environments<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To scan email attachments<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To isolate endpoint devices<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Defender for Identity sensors collect identity-related signals from supported Active Directory environments and provide this information to the Defender for Identity service for analysis. These signals can help detect suspicious authentication behavior, reconnaissance, credential-related activity, and other identity threats. The resulting detections can provide analysts with useful information about potentially compromised accounts and attack techniques. Defender for Identity is focused on identity security rather than endpoint malware scanning or email protection. Analysts can correlate identity detections with other Microsoft Defender XDR signals during investigations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 128<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender for Cloud capability helps organizations identify security posture issues across cloud resources?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cloud Security Posture Management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Safe Links<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Live response<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cloud Security Posture Management, or CSPM, helps organizations identify and manage security posture issues across cloud environments. It can provide visibility into misconfigurations, recommendations, compliance-related concerns, and other weaknesses that may increase exposure. Security teams can use these findings to prioritize remediation and improve the security configuration of cloud resources. CSPM focuses on reducing exposure and improving posture rather than directly investigating a specific endpoint incident. Analysts should review recommendations in the context of business requirements and determine which issues require immediate or planned remediation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 129<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which KQL operator can be used to create a new column based on an expression involving existing columns?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">join<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">summarize<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">extend<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">where<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The KQL <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">extend<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> operator creates calculated columns from existing fields or expressions. Analysts can use it to derive additional information during investigations, such as creating a normalized value, calculating a duration, or generating a field based on existing event properties. The new column can then be used by later operators in the query. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">extend<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> is different from <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">project<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which primarily controls which columns are returned. Analysts should ensure that expressions are compatible with the data types involved and produce meaningful results for the investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 130<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security analyst wants to identify the number of alerts generated for each device during a specific time period. Which KQL technique is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">summarize<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> with <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">count()<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> grouped by device<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">project<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to remove the device column<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">extend<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> without aggregation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">where<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> without a filtering condition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The KQL <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">summarize<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> operator with <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">count()<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> can aggregate records and calculate the number of events associated with each device. By grouping the results by a device field, the analyst can identify which devices generated the highest number of relevant events during the selected period. This approach is useful for spotting unusually noisy systems or devices associated with repeated security activity. Analysts should first apply appropriate filtering and time constraints so that the aggregation represents the intended event population. Additional investigation is required before concluding that a high count indicates malicious behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 131<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Sentinel feature is useful for deploying prebuilt analytics rules and other security content for a supported solution?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Incident queue<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content hub<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Watchlist<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Live response<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Microsoft Sentinel content hub provides packaged solution content that can include analytics rules and other security components for supported products and scenarios. Deploying content through the hub can reduce the amount of manual configuration required to establish common monitoring capabilities. Depending on the solution, packages may include data connectors, hunting queries, workbooks, parsers, and automation components. Administrators should review package requirements before deployment because some content depends on specific data sources or permissions. Installed content should also be maintained to benefit from relevant updates.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 132<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender XDR capability provides a unified view of related alerts from multiple Microsoft security products?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat analytics<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device discovery<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Defender XDR incidents provide a unified view of related alerts and security signals from supported Microsoft security products. An attack can affect multiple areas, such as endpoints, identities, email, and cloud applications, so combining related alerts helps analysts understand the broader attack sequence. Within an incident, analysts can review affected entities, alerts, evidence, and other investigation information. The unified view reduces the need to investigate every alert independently. Analysts should still validate relationships and timelines to determine which activities are actually connected to the incident.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 133<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender for Endpoint response action is designed to prevent a potentially compromised endpoint from communicating normally with the network?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device isolation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device discovery<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat analytics<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device isolation is a Microsoft Defender for Endpoint response action used to restrict network communication from a potentially compromised endpoint. This can help contain an active threat and prevent an attacker from communicating with the device or using it to continue activity within the environment. The action is intended to preserve required Defender connectivity while restricting other communications according to the supported isolation behavior. Analysts should consider the operational role of the device before isolation and document the reason for the response action. Further investigation should continue after containment.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 134<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Sentinel capability can send an alert or incident to an external ticketing or messaging system through an automated workflow?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Watchlist<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Workbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Playbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content hub<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Microsoft Sentinel playbook can automate interactions with external systems through Azure Logic Apps and supported connectors. For example, a playbook can create a ticket in a service-management platform or send a notification to an approved communication system when an incident meets specific conditions. This can improve response consistency and reduce repetitive manual tasks. Administrators should ensure that the workflow has the necessary permissions and that sensitive incident information is handled appropriately. Testing should be performed before production deployment to confirm that notifications and ticket creation work correctly.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 135<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Defender for Office 365 feature can be used to simulate phishing and other social engineering attacks for user awareness purposes?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Safe Links<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attack simulation training<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Safe Attachments<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attack simulation training allows organizations to conduct controlled simulations of phishing and other supported social engineering scenarios. The purpose is to assess user awareness and provide training based on simulated attack behavior. Security teams can use simulation results to identify areas where additional education may be useful. Attack simulation training is different from Safe Links and Safe Attachments, which provide protection against malicious URLs and attachments. Simulations should be planned carefully and conducted according to organizational policies so that users and business operations are not unnecessarily disrupted.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 136<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which KQL operator is used to filter a dataset based on a condition such as a specific IP address?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">project<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">summarize<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">extend<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">where<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The KQL <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">where<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> operator filters records according to a specified condition. For example, an analyst can use it to return only events associated with a particular IP address, username, device, or event type. Filtering is fundamental to threat hunting because security datasets can contain very large numbers of records. Analysts often use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">where<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> early in a query to narrow the dataset before performing additional operations. The condition should use the appropriate field and comparison method so that relevant records are not unintentionally excluded from the investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 137<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Sentinel component provides visualization of security metrics, trends, and other data through configurable dashboards?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Workbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Analytics rule<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automation rule<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data connector<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Sentinel workbooks provide configurable dashboards and visualizations for security data. Analysts can use charts, tables, graphs, and other visual elements to monitor trends and investigate patterns across collected information. Workbooks can help security teams communicate operational metrics and provide a high-level view of security activity. They do not primarily detect threats; detection is generally handled through analytics rules and other mechanisms. Organizations can customize workbooks to display information relevant to their environment, provided that the required data sources are available.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 138<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An analyst needs to investigate whether a suspicious hash has appeared on multiple endpoints. Which capability is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Threat analytics<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Device isolation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure Score<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced hunting is appropriate for searching endpoint telemetry for a suspicious file hash across multiple devices. An analyst can construct a KQL query against relevant file or device event tables and search for records containing the indicator. The results can reveal which devices observed the file, when it appeared, and potentially which processes or users were associated with it. Analysts should validate that the hash is relevant to the investigation and examine surrounding activity rather than assuming every occurrence represents compromise. Additional response actions can follow based on the evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 139<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Sentinel capability can automatically execute actions when a security incident is created or updated?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Workbook<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Watchlist<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automation rule<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data connector<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automation rules allow Microsoft Sentinel to perform configured actions when incidents meet specified conditions, including conditions related to incident creation or updates. Actions can include assigning incidents, changing status, adding tags, or triggering supported automated workflows. This capability helps security teams standardize repetitive incident-management tasks and reduce manual effort. Automation rules should be carefully scoped because an overly broad condition can affect many incidents unintentionally. Security teams should test rules, monitor their results, and periodically review configurations to ensure that automated actions remain aligned with current response procedures.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 140<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security analyst wants to investigate authentication activity by counting events for each user and sorting the users by the highest number of events. Which KQL approach is most suitable?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">project<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> followed by <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">extend<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">where<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> without aggregation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">join<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> without a matching field<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">summarize count()<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by user followed by <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">order by<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Using <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">summarize count()<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> grouped by user allows the analyst to calculate the number of authentication events associated with each account. Applying <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">order by<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> afterward can arrange the results so that users with the highest event counts appear first. This approach is useful for quickly identifying accounts with unusually high authentication activity. Analysts should first apply appropriate filters for the event type and time period. A high event count does not automatically indicate malicious behavior, so analysts should investigate source locations, authentication results, devices, and normal user activity before drawing conclusions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Microsoft SC-200 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 121 Which Microsoft Defender XDR capability can automatically disrupt certain attacks by taking predefined response actions against compromised entities? Threat analytics Automatic attack disruption Advanced hunting Secure Score Correct Answer: 2 Explanation Automatic attack disruption is a Microsoft Defender XDR capability designed to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15804"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15804"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15831,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15804\/revisions\/15831"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}