{"id":16192,"date":"2026-09-19T05:49:26","date_gmt":"2026-09-19T05:49:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=16192"},"modified":"2026-09-19T05:49:26","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T05:49:26","slug":"microsoft-sc-401-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part5-q81-q100","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-sc-401-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part5-q81-q100\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft SC-401 Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part5 Q81-Q100"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><\/h1>\n<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/sc-401-exam-dumps\"><b>Microsoft SC-401 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 81<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Purview capability helps administrators determine whether a sensitivity label is being applied correctly across organizational content?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data Explorer provides visibility into classified information and helps administrators examine classification results across supported content. It can be useful when validating whether sensitivity labels and other classification mechanisms are working as expected. Administrators can use this information to identify classification patterns, investigate potentially misclassified content, and refine information protection configurations. Data Explorer is therefore valuable during policy development and ongoing monitoring. It does not itself replace sensitivity label policies; instead, it provides information that administrators can use to assess and improve classification.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 82<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization has several sensitivity labels and wants the same label to be automatically applied to supported content when specific conditions are met. Which configuration should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auto-labeling policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Insider Risk case<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An auto-labeling policy automatically applies a sensitivity label when content satisfies configured conditions. This can reduce reliance on users to manually classify every document or message. Administrators can define conditions involving sensitive information and other supported classification criteria and then determine which label should be applied. Auto-labeling is especially useful when an organization wants consistent classification across large volumes of content. Because automatic labeling can affect access and protection behavior, administrators should test the policy and review its results before enabling broad enforcement.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 83<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company wants to ensure users cannot send a message containing certain sensitive information to external recipients unless they provide a business justification. Which DLP configuration supports this requirement?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention label<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP rule with block and override<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity label watermark<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A DLP rule can be configured to detect sensitive information and restrict an action such as sending the information to external recipients. When the appropriate override configuration is enabled, users may be allowed to proceed after providing a business justification. This gives administrators a way to protect sensitive data while accommodating legitimate business requirements. The DLP rule should contain appropriate conditions, actions, exceptions, and user notification settings. Administrators should also test the configuration to reduce unnecessary blocking of legitimate communications.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 84<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the primary purpose of DLP policy precedence when multiple DLP policies apply to the same activity?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To determine which retention period applies<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To assign sensitivity labels automatically<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To create an Insider Risk case<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To help determine which applicable DLP rules take priority<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP policy precedence helps determine how multiple applicable DLP policies and rules are evaluated when they affect the same activity. Organizations may have several policies covering different types of sensitive information, users, locations, or business requirements. Without appropriate precedence, overlapping rules could produce unexpected results or make policy behavior difficult to understand. Administrators should design policy order and rule conditions carefully and review how exceptions and actions interact. Proper precedence helps create predictable DLP enforcement across supported Microsoft 365 locations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 85<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which DLP capability allows an administrator to review potential policy matches before taking enforcement action?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy testing or simulation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity label encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP policy testing or simulation allows administrators to evaluate how a policy would behave before applying its strongest enforcement actions. This can reveal which users, activities, and content would match the configured conditions. Administrators can use the results to adjust conditions, exceptions, notifications, and actions before moving the policy into active enforcement. Testing is particularly important for policies involving sensitive information because broad conditions may produce many matches and disrupt normal business activities. It provides a safer way to validate policy behavior before production deployment.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 86<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security administrator wants Endpoint DLP to monitor sensitive data copied to removable USB storage. Which capability should be configured?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Endpoint DLP device activity controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity label publishing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Endpoint DLP can monitor and control supported activities involving sensitive information on managed devices, including actions involving removable storage when the relevant endpoint controls are configured. This helps organizations reduce the risk of sensitive information being copied from managed systems to unauthorized destinations. Administrators can configure appropriate actions such as auditing, blocking, or blocking with override, depending on organizational requirements. Endpoint DLP should be deployed and configured carefully so that legitimate business activities remain possible while risky transfers of sensitive information receive appropriate protection.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 87<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Endpoint DLP capability can help administrators investigate activities involving sensitive information on managed devices?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Activity Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention label<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive scope<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Activity Explorer can provide visibility into relevant activities involving classified or sensitive information across supported Microsoft Purview solutions, including endpoint-related activity. Security and compliance teams can use activity information to understand how users interact with sensitive content and investigate potentially risky events. This visibility can help administrators validate DLP policies and identify patterns that may require additional controls. Activity Explorer is an investigation and monitoring capability rather than a replacement for DLP enforcement. Actual blocking or restriction is determined by the configured policies and rules.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 88<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants to control the use of sensitive information on managed endpoints while allowing users to perform certain actions when they provide a valid justification. Which approach is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention-only configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Endpoint DLP with block and override<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery case<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Endpoint DLP with a block-and-override action can prevent risky activities involving sensitive information while allowing authorized users to continue when they provide the required justification. This approach gives an organization stronger protection than simple auditing while avoiding an absolute block for every business scenario. Administrators can use it for supported endpoint activities and configure the appropriate conditions and notifications. The justification requirement also creates an additional accountability mechanism. Organizations should monitor override activity to determine whether policies need refinement or whether repeated exceptions indicate a legitimate business requirement.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 89<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is a key purpose of retention labels in Microsoft Purview?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To manage how long specific content should be retained and what happens afterward<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To encrypt every email automatically<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To create Defender XDR incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To identify risky employees<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels allow organizations to apply retention settings to individual items or categories of content. A retention label can define how long information should be retained and, depending on its configuration, what action should occur when the retention period ends. This provides more granular control than applying a broad retention requirement to an entire location. Retention labels are especially useful when different types of records have different business or regulatory requirements. They should not be confused with sensitivity labels, whose primary purpose is information classification and protection.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 90<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A records management team wants users to manually classify certain documents as official business records and apply specific retention requirements. Which capability should be considered?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit Premium<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP alerts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OCR<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels can be used to classify individual content items according to records management and retention requirements. Organizations can publish appropriate labels so that users or automated processes can apply the correct retention classification to supported content. The label can define how long the item must be retained and may include additional records management settings. This approach is useful when different documents require different retention treatment. Retention labels therefore provide item-level governance that is more specific than simply applying one retention policy to an entire workload.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 91<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which retention capability can help automatically apply retention labels when content meets predefined conditions?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auto-apply retention label policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity label publishing policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP policy tip<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An auto-apply retention label policy can automatically apply a retention label when supported content meets configured conditions. This helps organizations apply records management requirements consistently without requiring users to manually classify every item. Conditions can be designed around relevant content characteristics and classification signals. Automatic retention labeling can be useful in environments containing large volumes of records, but administrators should validate the policy carefully because applying the wrong retention label may affect how long information must be preserved or how it is managed after the retention period.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 92<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization needs different retention requirements for employees in different departments and wants the targeting to update automatically when users change departments. Which capability is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Manual retention assignments<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive scopes<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP policy tips<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive scopes can dynamically target users, groups, or sites based on attributes and configured criteria. This makes them useful when retention requirements differ between departments or organizational groups and membership changes over time. Instead of manually updating a static list whenever an employee moves between departments, the adaptive scope can evaluate the defined attributes and adjust which users are included. This can simplify administration and reduce the possibility of outdated assignments. Adaptive scopes therefore provide a flexible method for targeting supported retention policies and configurations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 93<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What should an administrator use when trying to determine why a particular item is subject to a specific retention configuration?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OCR<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy lookup<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Trainable classifier<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy lookup helps administrators investigate which retention policies, labels, or related configurations apply to a particular user, location, or item. It can be especially useful when the observed retention behavior is not immediately clear. Instead of reviewing every policy manually, the administrator can use policy lookup to identify relevant configurations and troubleshoot their application. This can help explain why content is being retained, why a particular label is present, or which policy is affecting a location. It is therefore a practical troubleshooting capability for retention management.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 94<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A compliance team needs to review content that has reached the end of its retention period and determine whether it should be permanently deleted. Which process is relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity labeling<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP simulation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disposition review<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disposition review is part of records management processes where certain retained content requires review before final disposition. Depending on the configured retention and records management settings, authorized reviewers may need to determine whether content should be deleted, retained further, or otherwise handled according to organizational requirements. This provides additional control over the final stage of the information lifecycle. Disposition review is different from DLP because it concerns what happens to content after its retention requirements are met rather than preventing inappropriate sharing or transfer.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 95<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which capability can help an organization recover retained content after it has been removed from a user&#8217;s normal view?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recover retained content<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content marking<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP override<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Container labeling<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Purview provides capabilities for recovering retained content in supported scenarios when information has been removed from normal user access but remains preserved according to retention requirements. This can be important for compliance investigations, business continuity, or recovery situations. Retention mechanisms are designed to preserve information according to configured policies and labels rather than simply deleting it immediately. Administrators should follow the supported recovery procedures and ensure that access to retained content is limited to appropriately authorized personnel because the information may contain sensitive or regulated material.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 96<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants to preserve relevant information for an investigation so that it is not removed according to normal lifecycle processes. Which Microsoft Purview capability is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity label<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery hold<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OCR<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP policy tip<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An eDiscovery hold can help preserve relevant information associated with an investigation so that normal data lifecycle processes do not remove the information needed for the case. This is particularly important for legal or compliance investigations where potentially relevant content must remain available for review. A sensitivity label protects or classifies content, while a DLP policy controls data movement and sharing. An eDiscovery hold serves a different purpose by supporting preservation of information that may be required as part of an investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 97<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Purview capability helps organizations monitor and investigate potentially risky use of artificial intelligence services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DSPM for AI<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Purview Data Security Posture Management for AI, commonly called DSPM for AI, provides capabilities for understanding and managing data security risks associated with AI usage. It can help organizations gain visibility into AI interactions, identify potential data security concerns, and apply appropriate information protection controls. DSPM for AI works alongside capabilities such as sensitivity labels, DLP, auditing, and other Purview controls. Organizations can use it to develop a clearer picture of how sensitive information is being used with AI services and where additional controls may be necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 98<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security team wants to understand which AI-related activities may expose sensitive organizational information and use that information to improve protection policies. Which approach is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message encryption only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DSPM for AI monitoring and related Purview controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DSPM for AI can provide visibility into AI-related data security activity and help organizations identify areas where sensitive information may be exposed through AI interactions. Administrators can use the resulting insights alongside Purview controls such as DLP and sensitivity labels to improve protection policies. This approach supports a broader AI data security strategy rather than relying on a single control. Monitoring can help organizations understand actual usage patterns and then adjust policies according to identified risks, business requirements, and the capabilities available in their Microsoft environment.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 99<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants to reduce the risk of employees entering sensitive information into unsupported or risky AI applications through a managed browser environment. Which control can be relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Browser DLP for AI apps<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive scope only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Browser DLP for AI applications can help organizations apply data protection controls to supported AI interactions through managed browser environments. This can reduce the risk of users entering or transferring sensitive information into AI applications in ways that violate organizational policies. The capability can work as part of a broader Microsoft Purview strategy that includes DLP, sensitivity labels, and AI-related security monitoring. Administrators should evaluate supported browsers, applications, licensing, and configuration requirements before deployment to ensure the intended protection scenarios are covered.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 100<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which combination provides a broad approach to protecting sensitive information used with AI services in Microsoft 365?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels and eDiscovery only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention and OCR only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting and disposition review only<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity labels, DLP, auditing, and DSPM for AI<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A broad AI data protection strategy can combine sensitivity labels, DLP, auditing, and DSPM for AI. Sensitivity labels can classify and protect information, while DLP can help prevent inappropriate sharing or transfer of sensitive data. Auditing provides visibility into supported activities, and DSPM for AI helps organizations understand and manage data security risks associated with AI usage. Using these capabilities together provides multiple layers of protection rather than depending on a single control. The exact configuration should be aligned with the organization&#8217;s AI usage, data sensitivity, and compliance requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Microsoft SC-401 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 81 Which Microsoft Purview capability helps administrators determine whether a sensitivity label is being applied correctly across organizational content? Data Explorer Audit retention Message Encryption Adaptive Protection Correct Answer: 1 Explanation Data Explorer provides visibility into classified information and helps administrators examine classification [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16192"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16219,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16192\/revisions\/16219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}