{"id":16199,"date":"2026-09-19T05:47:38","date_gmt":"2026-09-19T05:47:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=16199"},"modified":"2026-09-19T05:47:38","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T05:47:38","slug":"microsoft-sc-401-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-q240","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-sc-401-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-q240\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft SC-401 Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part12 Q221-Q240"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>Microsoft SC-401 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 221<\/b><\/h3>\n

Which Microsoft Purview feature can help protect sensitive information used by Microsoft 365 Copilot and other supported AI services?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. DSPM for AI<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. eDiscovery hold<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    DSPM for AI helps organizations understand and manage data security risks associated with AI interactions. It provides visibility into how organizational data is used with supported AI services and can help identify potential security concerns. Organizations can combine DSPM for AI with sensitivity labels, DLP, auditing, and other Purview capabilities to establish layered protection. This is particularly useful as employees increasingly use AI services to process business information. Administrators should configure AI-related controls according to organizational data requirements and verify that the necessary roles and prerequisites are available.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 222<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Which control can prevent users from sharing sensitive information with an AI application when the activity violates a configured policy?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Retention policy<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. DLP policy<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. eDiscovery case<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Data loss prevention policies can help prevent or restrict inappropriate sharing of sensitive information with supported applications and services, including supported AI scenarios. A DLP policy evaluates configured conditions and can apply actions such as blocking an activity, warning the user, or allowing an override when appropriate. This makes DLP an important preventive control for AI-related data protection. Administrators should define sensitive information conditions carefully and test policies before enforcement to reduce false positives while ensuring that important business information receives the intended protection.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 223<\/b><\/h3>\n

      An administrator wants to determine which sensitive information types are detected in a particular item before investigating the user’s activity. Which capability is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Content Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        Content Explorer helps authorized administrators examine classified content and identify information associated with sensitivity labels or sensitive information types. This makes it useful when the investigation begins with a question about what sensitive information exists inside particular items. Activity Explorer serves a different purpose because it focuses on activities involving classified information. By using Content Explorer first, an administrator can better understand the classification of the content before reviewing related activity or policy events. Access should be limited because the feature can expose sensitive organizational information.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 224<\/b><\/h3>\n

        Which Microsoft Purview capability can help determine whether a DLP policy generated an event requiring administrator attention?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. DLP alerts<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Retention labels<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Container sensitivity labels<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. OCR<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          DLP alerts provide visibility into policy matches and activities that may require investigation. Depending on policy configuration, alerts can be generated when users perform activities involving sensitive information that meet defined DLP conditions. Administrators can review alert details to understand the affected user, activity, policy, and other available information. DLP alerts are different from audit logs because they are specifically associated with configured DLP policy events. Organizations should configure alert severity and notification settings appropriately so that important events receive timely attention without creating unnecessary alert volume.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 225<\/b><\/h3>\n

          A security team wants to review Purview-related security alerts together with other Microsoft security incidents. Which integration should it use?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Purview alerts in Microsoft Defender XDR<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Retention labels in SharePoint<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. OCR processing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            Purview alerts can be integrated with Microsoft Defender XDR so security teams can investigate relevant compliance and data-security alerts alongside broader security information. This can provide analysts with additional context when investigating suspicious or policy-related activity. Centralizing relevant alerts can also support established security operations workflows. Administrators should ensure that the required permissions and integrations are configured correctly. This capability does not replace Purview’s underlying policies; instead, it provides another investigation and monitoring experience for security teams working across Microsoft security solutions.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 226<\/b><\/h3>\n

            What is one reason an organization might use sensitivity labels together with DLP policies?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. To combine classification and protection with controls that restrict inappropriate data movement<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. To eliminate all audit records<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. To automatically remove retention requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. To replace eDiscovery<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Sensitivity labels and DLP policies address complementary information protection requirements. Sensitivity labels can classify content and apply protection settings such as encryption or access controls. DLP policies can detect sensitive information and restrict activities such as inappropriate sharing or transfer. Using them together allows organizations to protect information based on its classification while also controlling risky data movement. This layered approach can be especially useful when sensitive information is accessed through multiple services and devices. Administrators should test the interaction between the controls to ensure they produce the intended user experience.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 227<\/b><\/h3>\n

              A company wants users to classify documents manually but also wants certain high-risk content to be labeled automatically. Which approach should be considered?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Manual labeling combined with auto-labeling policies<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. Audit search only<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. eDiscovery holds only<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. Retention disposition only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Manual sensitivity labeling allows users to classify content based on their knowledge of the information, while auto-labeling policies can automatically classify supported content when defined conditions are met. Combining both approaches can provide flexibility while improving consistency for content that can be detected automatically. Administrators should establish clear labeling policies and test automatic classification before widespread deployment. They should also consider how automatically applied labels interact with existing user-selected labels and organizational rules. This approach can reduce classification gaps without requiring every decision to be made manually.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 228<\/b><\/h3>\n

                Which feature can help an administrator determine why a user or location is receiving a particular retention policy?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Policy lookup<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Content marking<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. OCR<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Policy lookup is designed to help administrators investigate which supported retention policies or configurations apply to a specific user, location, or item. It is particularly useful when retention behavior appears unexpected or when an administrator needs to verify that a policy is affecting the intended scope. Instead of reviewing every policy manually, the administrator can investigate the specific subject involved. This can simplify troubleshooting in environments with numerous retention policies, adaptive scopes, and labels. Policy lookup therefore supports more efficient analysis of retention configuration and policy application.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 229<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  An organization wants to classify a Microsoft Teams team based on its sensitivity and control who can access the team. Which capability should be considered?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Container sensitivity labels<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Audit Premium<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. DLP simulation<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Trainable classifiers<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Container sensitivity labels allow organizations to apply sensitivity classifications to supported collaboration containers such as Microsoft Teams teams and Microsoft 365 groups. Depending on the configuration, these labels can help control settings related to privacy, membership, or access. This allows the organization to apply governance at the collaboration-container level instead of relying only on individual files. Administrators should publish appropriate labels to the correct users and configure container settings carefully. Container labeling complements file and email sensitivity labeling by extending classification into collaboration environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 230<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    Which feature can require users to select a sensitivity label before completing certain supported labeling workflows?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Mandatory labeling<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Adaptive scopes<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. DLP alerts<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Mandatory labeling can require users to apply a sensitivity label to supported content or select an appropriate classification before proceeding with certain actions. This helps organizations reduce the amount of unclassified information and establish consistent classification practices. Administrators should provide clear labels and appropriate user guidance before enabling mandatory labeling broadly. If the configuration is too restrictive or labels are poorly designed, users may experience unnecessary interruptions. Testing the labeling experience and ensuring that users understand the available classifications can make deployment more effective.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 231<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      A user attempts to lower a document from a highly sensitive label to a less restrictive label. The organization wants the user to explain the reason. Which setting supports this?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Downgrade justification<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Retention label<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Audit Premium<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Adaptive scope<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Downgrade justification can require users to provide a reason when reducing the sensitivity classification of supported content. This adds accountability to potentially important classification changes and gives administrators additional context during investigations. The requirement is particularly useful when an organization considers a lower sensitivity classification to represent an increased risk of inappropriate access or sharing. The justification setting is part of sensitivity label configuration and should be enabled according to organizational requirements. Administrators can then review relevant activity through supported auditing and information protection investigation capabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 232<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        Which feature can add a watermark to a document when a sensitivity label is applied?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Content marking<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. Policy lookup<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Content marking can apply visible indicators such as watermarks to supported documents when a sensitivity label is applied. Organizations can use watermarks to make the classification of information obvious to users and recipients. Other supported content markings can include headers and footers. These visual indicators help communicate handling requirements but do not independently encrypt the document or control retention. Protection settings within sensitivity labels can provide additional access restrictions. Administrators should select appropriate markings based on business requirements and test how they appear across supported applications.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 233<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          What is the primary purpose of the Microsoft Purview Information Protection scanner?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. To discover and classify sensitive information in supported on-premises repositories<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. To create eDiscovery cases<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. To manage Insider Risk alerts<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. To generate audit retention policies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            The Microsoft Purview Information Protection scanner helps organizations discover and classify sensitive information in supported on-premises repositories. It can scan content, identify relevant sensitive information, and apply supported classification or protection configurations according to the organization’s information protection strategy. This extends Purview capabilities beyond cloud-only content in supported scenarios. Administrators should plan the scanner deployment carefully, including supported repositories, service accounts, permissions, and configuration requirements. Proper testing is important before applying automatic classification or protection to large on-premises data repositories.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 234<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            An organization wants to protect sensitive email sent to external recipients. Which Microsoft Purview capability is designed for this purpose?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Activity Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Adaptive scope<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Microsoft Purview Message Encryption can protect supported email messages by encrypting their contents and controlling access for recipients. This is useful when sensitive information must be sent to external users without exposing the message contents to unauthorized parties. Depending on the configuration, recipients can authenticate and access protected messages through supported methods. Message Encryption focuses on confidentiality and access protection, while DLP can provide additional controls that prevent or restrict inappropriate sharing. Organizations should test external recipient experiences before deploying encryption policies broadly.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 235<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              Which Microsoft Purview capability can help apply a sensitivity label automatically based on detected sensitive information?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Auto-labeling policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. eDiscovery hold<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Auto-labeling policies can automatically apply sensitivity labels to supported content when configured conditions are satisfied. These conditions can use sensitive information types, classifiers, or other supported detection mechanisms. Automatic labeling can improve consistency and reduce reliance on users to classify every item manually. Before deployment, administrators should test the policy to determine whether it produces the expected results and whether false positives occur. Auto-labeling should also be designed carefully when multiple sensitivity labels exist, because incorrect configuration could apply an inappropriate level of protection to business content.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 236<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                A compliance administrator wants to see whether a newly configured sensitivity label is being applied correctly before making the policy broadly available. What is the most appropriate approach?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Test the configuration with a controlled group<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Immediately publish it to every employee<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Delete existing labels<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Disable auditing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Testing a new sensitivity label with a controlled group allows administrators to validate the configuration before broad deployment. The test can verify label visibility, protection settings, content markings, encryption behavior, and the overall user experience. Controlled testing can also reveal conflicts with existing publishing policies or unexpected effects on business workflows. After reviewing the results, administrators can refine the configuration and gradually expand the deployment. This staged approach reduces the likelihood of organization-wide disruption and provides an opportunity to correct configuration problems before production rollout.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 237<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  Which DLP action can prevent a user from performing a supported activity involving sensitive information?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Block<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Retain<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Label<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Archive<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A DLP block action can prevent a supported activity when the configured policy conditions are met. For example, a policy might restrict users from transferring sensitive information to an unauthorized destination. Depending on the policy configuration, administrators may allow an override or require justification for certain legitimate business scenarios. Blocking is a preventive control and should therefore be tested carefully before enforcement. Administrators should review policy matches and user workflows to ensure that the policy protects sensitive information without unnecessarily interrupting legitimate organizational activities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 238<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    Which capability can provide stronger DLP restrictions for users identified as having elevated insider risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. OCR<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. eDiscovery<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Adaptive Protection can dynamically adjust supported DLP controls according to a user’s insider risk level. This enables organizations to apply stronger restrictions when risk increases rather than applying the same controls to every user. For example, supported DLP policies can become more restrictive for users whose risk level meets configured criteria. This approach can help organizations balance usability and security. Administrators should define risk thresholds carefully and test the resulting policy behavior to ensure that legitimate users are not unnecessarily restricted while elevated-risk situations receive appropriate protection.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 239<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which capability helps organizations identify and investigate potentially risky AI-related activities by users?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Insider Risk Management<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Retention labels<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Content marking<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Insider Risk Management can support investigation of risky user activities involving organizational information, including supported scenarios related to AI usage. Organizations can configure relevant indicators and policies to identify activities that may represent increased insider risk. This can provide an additional perspective beyond DLP, which primarily focuses on policy-defined data movement or protection conditions. AI-related insider risk monitoring should be implemented with appropriate privacy and access controls because investigations may involve sensitive user activity. Administrators should verify which AI-related indicators and scenarios are supported in their current environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 240<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        A company wants to understand which AI services are being used with organizational data and identify related data-security risks. Which Purview capability should it investigate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. DSPM for AI<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. Retention disposition<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. Audit retention only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          DSPM for AI provides capabilities designed to help organizations understand data security risks associated with AI services and interactions. It can provide visibility into AI-related data usage and help identify areas where sensitive organizational information may require additional protection. Organizations can use these insights alongside DLP, sensitivity labels, auditing, and other Purview controls. Before implementing DSPM for AI, administrators should verify the relevant prerequisites, licensing, permissions, and supported scenarios. This helps ensure that AI-related monitoring and protection are aligned with the organization’s broader information security strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Microsoft SC-401 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 221 Which Microsoft Purview feature can help protect sensitive information used by Microsoft 365 Copilot and other supported AI services? DSPM for AI Retention disposition eDiscovery hold Document fingerprinting Correct Answer: 1 Explanation DSPM for AI helps organizations understand and manage data security […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16199"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16199"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16199\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16212,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16199\/revisions\/16212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}