{"id":16203,"date":"2026-09-19T05:46:16","date_gmt":"2026-09-19T05:46:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=16203"},"modified":"2026-09-19T05:46:16","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T05:46:16","slug":"microsoft-sc-401-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part16-q301-q320","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/microsoft-sc-401-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part16-q301-q320\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft SC-401 Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part16 Q301-Q320"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><\/h1>\n<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/sc-401-exam-dumps\"><b>Microsoft SC-401 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 301<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which Microsoft Purview feature helps administrators investigate user and administrator activities recorded in audit logs?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Purview Audit<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity labels<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Purview Audit provides searchable records of supported user and administrator activities across Microsoft 365 services. It is useful when administrators need to investigate actions such as accessing, modifying, or sharing information. Audit data can help establish a timeline during security, compliance, or operational investigations. Organizations should configure appropriate auditing and retention settings according to their requirements. Audit is different from Activity Explorer, which focuses more specifically on data-related activities associated with information protection and DLP. Proper permissions are required to search and review audit records.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 302<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which feature provides a detailed view of activities related to sensitive information, sensitivity labels, and DLP events?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Activity Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Communication Compliance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Activity Explorer provides a detailed view of supported activities involving sensitive information, sensitivity labels, and data loss prevention events. It helps administrators understand what happened to protected or sensitive content and can provide useful context during investigations. For example, an administrator may use it to review activities involving labeling, sharing, or DLP policy matches. Activity Explorer is different from the broader Purview Audit capability, which searches audit records across supported services. Administrators should use the appropriate investigation tool based on the type of activity they need to examine.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 303<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the main purpose of Microsoft Purview Content Explorer?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To configure retention periods<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To create eDiscovery cases<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To view sensitive information detected in supported content<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To encrypt email automatically<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content Explorer helps authorized administrators view information about sensitive content detected in supported Microsoft 365 locations. It can provide visibility into the actual content associated with sensitive information types and other classification results, depending on the configuration and permissions. This makes it useful for investigating whether sensitive information is stored where expected and for validating classification results. Because Content Explorer can expose sensitive organizational data, access should be restricted to appropriate roles. Administrators should use it carefully during data discovery, classification validation, and compliance investigations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 304<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An administrator needs to inspect classification results across a large Microsoft 365 environment without directly opening individual sensitive files. Which capability is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP override<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery hold<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data Explorer provides administrators with visibility into classified or detected content and associated classification information across supported environments. It can help administrators investigate how sensitive information is identified and where classification results occur without requiring them to manually inspect every item. This can be valuable when validating information protection configurations or identifying patterns across large datasets. Content Explorer can provide deeper visibility into actual sensitive content, while Data Explorer is useful for reviewing classification-related information. Appropriate permissions should be assigned because classification data can itself be sensitive.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 305<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which feature can protect email messages by encrypting their contents and controlling access to recipients?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Purview Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Activity Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive scopes<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Insider Risk connectors<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Purview Message Encryption helps protect email messages by encrypting message content and controlling access according to configured protection requirements. It is useful when users need to send sensitive information to internal or external recipients while maintaining stronger control over the message. Depending on the configuration, organizations can apply encryption through supported policies and workflows. Message Encryption is different from DLP: DLP identifies and controls risky data-sharing actions, while encryption protects the message content. Administrators should configure encryption policies according to organizational security and collaboration requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 306<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization needs to send encrypted messages to external recipients and wants additional control over how recipients interact with the protected message. Which capability should administrators investigate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Advanced Message Encryption provides additional capabilities for protecting encrypted email communications in supported Microsoft Purview scenarios. It can be useful when organizations need stronger control over external message sharing and recipient access. Depending on the configuration, administrators can apply supported restrictions and protection settings to encrypted messages. This provides an additional layer beyond simply identifying sensitive information. Administrators should review licensing, supported scenarios, and configuration requirements before deployment. Encryption policies should also be tested with both internal and external recipients to ensure that intended access and user experience are maintained.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 307<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which setting determines whether users can apply a particular sensitivity label in supported Microsoft 365 applications?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Label publishing policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery case<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP alert<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A sensitivity label becomes available to users through a label publishing policy. Administrators use publishing policies to determine which users or groups can access specific labels and how those labels are presented in supported applications. This separation between creating a label and publishing it allows organizations to control deployment gradually. Administrators can target labels to appropriate business groups rather than making every label available to everyone. Before broad deployment, organizations should test publishing policies with representative users and verify that the correct labels appear in supported Microsoft 365 applications.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 308<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A company has created a highly confidential sensitivity label but wants only the legal department to see it. What should the administrator configure?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A targeted sensitivity label publishing policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A retention disposition review<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An Activity Explorer filter<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An audit retention policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A targeted sensitivity label publishing policy can make a specific sensitivity label available only to selected users or groups, such as the legal department. Creating a label alone does not necessarily make it available to every user. Publishing policies provide controlled distribution and help organizations implement labels according to departmental requirements. Administrators should verify group membership and policy settings before deployment. Testing with representative legal users can confirm that the intended label is available while users outside the target group do not receive unnecessary labeling options.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 309<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What can a sensitivity label do when configured with protection settings?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apply encryption and usage rights to supported content<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Create an eDiscovery case<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Search audit records<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Trigger a disposition review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity labels can include protection settings that apply encryption and usage rights to supported content. These settings can restrict who may access protected information and what actions authorized users can perform. This allows organizations to protect information even when it moves beyond its original storage location. Label protection should be designed according to business requirements because overly restrictive settings can interfere with legitimate collaboration. Administrators should test permissions with representative users and verify that authorized users can perform required activities while unauthorized access remains restricted.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 310<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A user attempts to reduce a document from a highly sensitive label to a lower classification. The organization wants the user to explain the reason. Which feature supports this requirement?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mandatory labeling<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Justification for lowering a sensitivity label<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit Premium<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Organizations can configure sensitivity label settings to require users to provide justification when lowering a document&#8217;s sensitivity classification. This creates an additional accountability measure for potentially risky label changes. The justification can also provide useful context during later investigations or audits. This requirement does not prevent users from changing labels automatically in every scenario; instead, it introduces a documented reason for certain downgrade actions. Administrators should determine appropriate downgrade requirements and test the user experience before deployment to ensure the control supports security without unnecessarily disrupting legitimate business activities.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 311<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which feature can automatically apply a sensitivity label when supported content matches configured conditions?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auto-labeling policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery hold<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disposition review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An auto-labeling policy can automatically apply a sensitivity label when supported content meets configured conditions. This helps organizations protect large volumes of information without requiring users to manually identify every sensitive document or message. Conditions can be based on supported sensitive information detection and other classification criteria. Administrators should test auto-labeling policies carefully before enabling them broadly because automatic labeling can affect access, encryption, and user workflows. A controlled rollout allows organizations to identify false positives and adjust conditions before the policy is fully enforced.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 312<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which sensitivity label capability can add visual indicators such as headers, footers, or watermarks to supported content?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content marking<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy lookup<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content marking allows sensitivity labels to add visual indicators to supported content. Examples can include headers, footers, or watermarks that communicate the classification of information to users. These markings can help employees recognize the sensitivity of documents and encourage appropriate handling. Content marking is different from encryption because it provides a visible classification indicator rather than directly controlling access to the content. Administrators should configure markings according to organizational standards and test how they appear in supported applications before applying them broadly.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 313<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which sensitivity label feature allows organizations to classify supported Teams, Microsoft 365 Groups, or SharePoint sites?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Container labeling<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit Premium<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OCR<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Exact Data Match<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Container sensitivity labels can classify supported containers such as Microsoft Teams teams, Microsoft 365 Groups, and SharePoint sites. This allows organizations to apply classification and supported protection settings at the container level rather than only labeling individual documents or emails. Container labeling can help control collaboration environments according to the sensitivity of the information expected to be stored there. Administrators should consider the organization&#8217;s collaboration model and verify which container settings are supported. Proper publishing and permissions are also important so users receive appropriate labels for the containers they manage.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 314<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An administrator wants to make a sensitivity label available to several business groups but not to the entire organization. What should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Purview Audit<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Label publishing policy assignments<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP simulation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Forensic evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Label publishing policy assignments allow administrators to control which users or groups can access published sensitivity labels. This supports gradual deployment and departmental targeting without requiring every organization member to receive every label. For example, a label designed for confidential legal information can be published only to legal and compliance groups. Administrators should review group membership and publishing policy configuration before deployment. Controlled publishing reduces unnecessary user choices and helps ensure that sensitive classification schemes are presented to the people who need them.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 315<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which DLP capability allows an administrator to test policy behavior before enforcing controls on users?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Simulation or test mode<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention label<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit Premium<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitivity label encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP simulation or test capabilities allow administrators to evaluate how a policy would behave before applying full enforcement. Testing can reveal which activities would match the configured conditions and help identify false positives or unexpected policy interactions. This is particularly valuable when a DLP policy contains multiple conditions, exceptions, or sensitive information types. Administrators can use the results to refine the policy before enabling blocking or other restrictive actions. A controlled testing phase helps reduce disruption and provides greater confidence when moving a DLP configuration into production.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 316<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A DLP policy has two rules that both match the same activity. Which concept determines how the rules are evaluated in relation to one another?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP rule precedence<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content marking<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive scope<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP rule precedence determines how applicable DLP rules are evaluated when multiple rules could match the same activity. Administrators should design rule ordering carefully so that more specific requirements are handled appropriately and broader rules do not unintentionally produce conflicting results. Understanding precedence becomes especially important in environments with multiple DLP policies, conditions, exceptions, and actions. Administrators should review policy behavior in testing or simulation before enforcement. Clear rule design and appropriate ordering can reduce unexpected outcomes and make DLP troubleshooting easier.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 317<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which DLP capability can allow a user to proceed with a potentially restricted action when organizational policy permits an override and the user provides justification?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP user override<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit search<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention label<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery hold<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A DLP user override can allow an authorized user to proceed with an action that would otherwise be restricted when the policy is configured to permit an override. Organizations can require the user to provide a business justification, creating an accountability record for the exception. This approach can balance security controls with legitimate business requirements. Administrators should use overrides carefully because excessive exceptions can weaken DLP protection. Policies should clearly define which situations permit overrides, and administrators should monitor override activity to identify repeated or suspicious patterns.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 318<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants DLP controls to respond dynamically to a user&#8217;s changing insider risk level. Which capability should be evaluated?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive Protection<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Content Explorer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">eDiscovery<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adaptive Protection can dynamically adjust supported data protection controls according to changing user risk levels. This helps organizations apply stronger controls when risk indicators increase while avoiding the need to treat every user identically. In supported scenarios, Adaptive Protection can work with DLP and other controls to respond to risk context. Administrators should carefully define risk-based policies and understand how they interact with existing DLP configurations. Because dynamic controls can affect user activity, organizations should test policies and communicate relevant changes to affected users.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 319<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which capability can help protect sensitive data when users interact with supported AI applications through Microsoft Edge for Business?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Browser DLP for AI apps<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Audit retention<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disposition review<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Browser DLP for supported AI applications can help organizations apply data protection controls when users interact with AI services through supported Microsoft Edge for Business scenarios. This is particularly relevant as organizations adopt generative AI tools and need to reduce the risk of sensitive information being submitted to external or unauthorized AI services. Administrators should identify supported applications and configure appropriate DLP controls. Testing is important because AI-related browser activity can involve different types of content and user workflows than traditional file or email sharing.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 320<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization wants to monitor how employees use supported AI services and identify risky AI-related activities as part of its information protection strategy. Which Microsoft Purview capability should it investigate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Purview Message Encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DSPM for AI<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retention labels<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Document fingerprinting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Microsoft Purview Data Security Posture Management for AI, or DSPM for AI, helps organizations understand and manage data security risks associated with supported AI services. It can provide visibility into AI-related activities and help organizations identify areas where sensitive information may be exposed through AI usage. DSPM for AI works alongside other Purview controls rather than replacing them. Organizations can combine AI-focused monitoring with sensitivity labels, DLP, auditing, and other protections. Administrators should review prerequisites, supported AI services, permissions, and available policies before deployment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Microsoft SC-401 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 301 Which Microsoft Purview feature helps administrators investigate user and administrator activities recorded in audit logs? Purview Audit Adaptive Protection Sensitivity labels Document fingerprinting Correct Answer: 1 Explanation Purview Audit provides searchable records of supported user and administrator activities across Microsoft 365 services. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16203"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16203"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16203\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16208,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16203\/revisions\/16208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}