{"id":16253,"date":"2026-09-19T06:12:23","date_gmt":"2026-09-19T06:12:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=16253"},"modified":"2026-09-19T06:12:23","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T06:12:23","slug":"acams-cams-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-10-q181-200","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/acams-cams-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-10-q181-200\/","title":{"rendered":"ACAMS CAMS Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part 10 Q181-200"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>ACAMS CAMS Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 181. What is the primary purpose of ongoing customer due diligence?<\/b><\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. <\/b> To eliminate the need for customer identification<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> To continuously assess whether customer information and activity remain consistent with the relationship<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> To guarantee that customers never conduct unusual transactions<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> To replace transaction monitoring systems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2. To continuously assess whether customer information and activity remain consistent with the relationship<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Ongoing customer due diligence helps an institution maintain an up-to-date understanding of its customers throughout the relationship. Customer circumstances can change after onboarding, including ownership, occupation, business activities, geographic exposure, source of funds, and transaction behavior. Regular reviews and event-driven updates allow the institution to identify material changes that could affect the customer’s AML risk. Ongoing due diligence also supports transaction monitoring because investigators need accurate customer information to determine whether activity is consistent with expected behavior. The process should be risk-based, appropriately documented, and performed according to applicable regulatory and institutional requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 182. Which event should prompt a review of a customer’s AML risk rating?<\/b><\/h3>\n
      \n
    1. <\/b> A significant unexplained change in transaction behavior<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> A routine monthly utility payment<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> A normal salary deposit<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> An unchanged mailing preference<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 1. A significant unexplained change in transaction behavior<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      A significant unexplained change in transaction behavior can indicate that the customer’s circumstances or risk profile have changed. For example, an account that historically received regular domestic payments may suddenly begin receiving large international transfers from unrelated counterparties. Such a change should be investigated to determine whether there is a legitimate explanation and whether the customer’s existing risk rating remains appropriate. Other events that may trigger review include changes in beneficial ownership, new high-risk geographic exposure, adverse information, or changes in business activities. Risk ratings should reflect current information rather than remain fixed indefinitely.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 183. Which characteristic is commonly associated with a shell company?<\/b><\/h3>\n
        \n
      1. <\/b> Extensive publicly documented operating activities<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> Large numbers of ordinary employees<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> Minimal or no apparent legitimate business operations<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> Transparent ownership in all circumstances<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Minimal or no apparent legitimate business operations<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        A shell company is generally an entity with limited or no substantial operating activity, although shell entities can have legitimate purposes in certain circumstances. From an AML perspective, concern may arise when an entity appears to exist primarily to hold assets, move funds, obscure ownership, or create layers between financial activity and the individuals controlling it. Investigators should examine the company’s stated purpose, ownership structure, business operations, transaction activity, jurisdictions, and supporting documentation. The mere existence of a shell company does not prove illicit activity. Risk should be evaluated based on the complete circumstances and available evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 184. Why can nominee directors or shareholders create AML concerns?<\/b><\/h3>\n
          \n
        1. <\/b> They always indicate criminal activity<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> They may make the true ownership or control structure less transparent<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> They prevent a company from opening an account<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> They eliminate beneficial ownership requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 2. They may make the true ownership or control structure less transparent<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Nominee directors or shareholders can create AML concerns because they may make it more difficult to determine who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity. Nominee arrangements can have legitimate commercial or legal purposes, but they require careful assessment when they obscure the relationship between the formal registered parties and the actual beneficial owners. Financial institutions should obtain sufficient information to understand the ownership and control structure and identify the individuals who ultimately exercise control. Where transparency cannot be adequately established, additional due diligence and escalation may be appropriate under the institution’s risk-based framework.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 185. What is a key AML risk associated with private banking?<\/b><\/h3>\n
            \n
          1. <\/b> Customers generally cannot make large transactions<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> Private banking has no cross-border activity<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> Wealthy customers never require enhanced due diligence<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> Complex structures and high-value transactions can increase financial crime exposure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 4. Complex structures and high-value transactions can increase financial crime exposure<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Private banking can present elevated AML risks because relationships may involve high-value assets, complex ownership structures, trusts, investment vehicles, international transactions, and customers with significant political or business influence. The concentration of substantial wealth can make private banking attractive for concealing or moving illicit proceeds. Institutions should therefore understand the customer’s source of wealth, source of funds, business activities, beneficial ownership, geographic exposure, and expected transaction patterns. Where risk factors are present, enhanced due diligence and closer ongoing monitoring may be appropriate. The existence of substantial wealth alone does not establish suspicious activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 186. Which document may help verify the source of wealth of a customer?<\/b><\/h3>\n
              \n
            1. <\/b> Evidence of accumulated business income or asset ownership<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> A restaurant menu<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> An unrelated advertisement<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> A personal preference survey<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1. Evidence of accumulated business income or asset ownership<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Source-of-wealth verification seeks to understand how a customer accumulated their overall wealth. Depending on the circumstances, useful evidence can include business financial statements, employment records, tax documentation, inheritance records, property sale agreements, investment statements, or other reliable information showing the origin and accumulation of assets. The appropriate evidence depends on the customer’s circumstances and risk level. Investigators should consider whether the information is credible, consistent, and sufficient to explain the customer’s financial position. Source of wealth differs from source of funds, which focuses on the origin of particular money involved in a transaction.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 187. What should an institution consider when assessing geographic AML risk?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                \n
              1. <\/b> Only the customer’s nationality<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> Only the physical location of the branch<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Jurisdictional risks associated with customers, transactions, and counterparties<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> Only the customer’s preferred currency<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Jurisdictional risks associated with customers, transactions, and counterparties<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Geographic AML risk assessment should consider the jurisdictions connected to the customer and financial activity. Relevant factors can include where the customer operates, where counterparties are located, where funds originate or are sent, and whether transactions involve jurisdictions associated with elevated money laundering, corruption, sanctions, terrorist financing, or regulatory risks. Geographic risk should not be determined solely by nationality or residence. Institutions should consider current and relevant risk information and apply controls proportionately. A connection to a higher-risk jurisdiction does not automatically mean activity is illicit, but it may justify additional scrutiny depending on the circumstances.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 188. What is a potential red flag in correspondent banking?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                  \n
                1. <\/b> A respondent bank with unclear ownership and weak AML controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> A fully documented respondent relationship<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> Routine settlement activity consistent with the agreement<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> Regular compliance reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 1. A respondent bank with unclear ownership and weak AML controls<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Correspondent banking relationships can create additional AML exposure because one financial institution may provide services that allow another institution’s customers to access the international financial system. If a respondent bank has unclear ownership, weak AML controls, limited transparency, or unexplained higher-risk activity, the correspondent institution may face increased risk. Appropriate due diligence can include understanding the respondent’s business, ownership, management, AML program, regulatory status, customer base, and relevant geographic exposure. Institutions should establish appropriate controls and monitoring based on the assessed risk and should maintain documentation supporting the relationship and its ongoing review.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 189. What is nested correspondent banking?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                    \n
                  1. <\/b> A situation where a correspondent relationship gives indirect access to another financial institution<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> A customer opening two personal accounts<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> A bank changing its office location<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> A company paying two invoices<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. A situation where a correspondent relationship gives indirect access to another financial institution<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Nested correspondent banking can occur when one financial institution accesses correspondent services through another respondent institution rather than maintaining a direct correspondent relationship with the correspondent bank. This can make it more difficult for the correspondent institution to understand the ultimate users of the services and associated transaction risks. Institutions should understand the nature of the relationship, the respondent’s customer base, applicable controls, and the extent of indirect access. Appropriate due diligence and monitoring help identify unusual activity and ensure that indirect relationships do not create unmanaged financial crime exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 190. What is trade-based money laundering?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Using legitimate trade transactions to move or disguise illicit funds<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> Paying employees through payroll<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> Purchasing ordinary household goods<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> Filing a normal customs declaration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1. Using legitimate trade transactions to move or disguise illicit funds<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Trade-based money laundering involves using trade transactions to move value or disguise the origins of illicit funds. Techniques can include misrepresenting the price, quantity, quality, or description of goods, using multiple invoices, over- or under-invoicing, or conducting transactions that lack a clear commercial rationale. AML professionals should consider transaction values, counterparties, shipping routes, goods involved, payment flows, and documentation when assessing trade-related risk. Legitimate international trade can naturally involve complex transactions, so a single unusual characteristic does not establish TBML. Effective analysis requires considering multiple indicators and the overall commercial context.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 191. Which activity may indicate trade-based money laundering?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Invoice values that appear inconsistent with the goods being traded<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> Properly documented routine purchases<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> Regular domestic payroll<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> Standard utility payments<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Invoice values that appear inconsistent with the goods being traded<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Significant discrepancies between invoice values and the apparent market value of goods can be an indicator of trade-based money laundering. Criminals may manipulate trade prices to transfer value between parties while making the movement appear commercially legitimate. Investigators may compare invoices with available trade documentation, shipping information, product descriptions, quantities, counterparties, and reasonable market values. Other indicators can strengthen the concern, particularly when several unusual characteristics occur together. However, pricing differences can have legitimate explanations such as quality, contractual terms, discounts, or specialized goods. Investigators should therefore seek appropriate evidence before reaching a conclusion.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 192. What is the purpose of sanctions screening?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                          \n
                        1. <\/b> To calculate customer profitability<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> To identify potential matches against applicable sanctions restrictions<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> To determine employee bonuses<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> To replace customer due diligence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2. To identify potential matches against applicable sanctions restrictions<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Sanctions screening is designed to identify customers, counterparties, transactions, vessels, organizations, or other relevant parties that may match individuals or entities subject to applicable sanctions restrictions. Screening can be performed at onboarding and periodically or during transactions, depending on the institution’s risk and legal obligations. Potential matches require appropriate investigation because names can produce false positives, particularly when common names or incomplete information are involved. Institutions should use relevant identifying information to determine whether a true match exists and should follow applicable requirements for handling confirmed sanctions concerns.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 193. What should an analyst do when a sanctions alert cannot immediately be resolved?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Ignore the alert<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> Process the transaction without review<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> Investigate additional identifying information and follow escalation procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> Delete the customer’s records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 3. Investigate additional identifying information and follow escalation procedures<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            When a sanctions alert cannot immediately be resolved, the analyst should conduct an appropriate review using available identifying information and follow the institution’s established escalation procedures. Relevant information may include names, dates of birth, addresses, nationality, registration details, ownership information, and other identifiers. The analyst should document the investigation and avoid prematurely classifying the alert as either a true match or false positive. If the information indicates a potential sanctions concern, the case should be escalated according to applicable legal and internal requirements. Proper handling helps reduce both compliance risk and unnecessary disruption to legitimate customers.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 194. What is the purpose of AML quality assurance testing?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                              \n
                            1. <\/b> To verify that AML processes and investigations operate according to established requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> To eliminate all customer reviews<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> To increase transaction values<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> To replace independent testing completely<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1. To verify that AML processes and investigations operate according to established requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              AML quality assurance testing helps institutions assess whether operational processes are being performed consistently and according to established policies, procedures, and regulatory expectations. QA reviews may examine customer due diligence, transaction monitoring alerts, investigations, sanctions screening, case documentation, escalation decisions, and other compliance activities. Findings can identify documentation weaknesses, inconsistent decisions, training needs, or process gaps. Quality assurance is distinct from broader independent testing or audit activities, although the functions can complement one another. Effective QA should produce documented findings and support corrective actions that improve the reliability and consistency of the AML program.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 195. Why is employee training important in an AML program?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Employees only need training during onboarding<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> Training helps staff recognize and appropriately respond to financial crime risks<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> Training removes the need for written policies<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> Training guarantees that employees will never make mistakes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 2. Training helps staff recognize and appropriately respond to financial crime risks<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                AML training helps employees understand their responsibilities and recognize indicators of money laundering, terrorist financing, sanctions violations, fraud, and other relevant financial crime risks. Training should be appropriate to the employee’s role because front-line staff, investigators, relationship managers, and senior management may encounter different risks and responsibilities. Refresher training is also important because regulations, internal procedures, emerging typologies, products, and risk exposures can change. Effective training should be documented and supported by appropriate assessment or monitoring. Training cannot eliminate every compliance error, but it strengthens the organization’s overall ability to identify and manage financial crime risks.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 196. What is the purpose of an AML escalation process?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> To prevent employees from reporting concerns<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> To ensure potentially significant issues are reviewed by the appropriate personnel<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> To automatically close all alerts<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> To eliminate management involvement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2. To ensure potentially significant issues are reviewed by the appropriate personnel<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  An AML escalation process provides a structured method for moving significant or unresolved concerns to personnel with the appropriate authority and expertise. Escalation may be necessary when investigators identify potentially suspicious activity, sanctions concerns, material customer risk changes, inadequate documentation, or other issues requiring higher-level review. A clear process helps ensure that important matters are not overlooked or handled inconsistently. Institutions should define escalation criteria, responsibilities, timelines, documentation requirements, and decision-making authority. Effective escalation supports accountability and helps ensure that significant risks receive appropriate attention without automatically treating every unusual event as suspicious.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 197. What is an important consideration when closing an AML alert as non-suspicious?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> The analyst should document the evidence and rationale for closure<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> The analyst should delete the alert immediately<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> The analyst should avoid reviewing customer information<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> The analyst should always escalate the alert<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. The analyst should document the evidence and rationale for closure<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    When an AML alert is closed as non-suspicious, the decision should be supported by sufficient documentation explaining what information was reviewed and why the activity was considered reasonable or adequately explained. The record may include transaction details, customer profile information, supporting documents, research findings, and relevant communications. Clear documentation allows supervisors and independent reviewers to understand the decision and determine whether the investigation was conducted appropriately. Closure does not mean the customer is permanently considered risk-free. Future activity should continue to be monitored, and new information may justify reopening or reassessing the relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 198. What can an AML risk assessment help an institution determine?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> The appropriate allocation of AML resources and controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> The personal preferences of customers<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> The profitability of every transaction<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> The exact future behavior of every customer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1. The appropriate allocation of AML resources and controls<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      An AML risk assessment helps an institution understand where its money laundering and terrorist financing risks are concentrated and determine how controls and resources should be allocated. The assessment may consider customers, products and services, delivery channels, geographic exposure, transaction types, and other relevant factors. The results can influence customer due diligence, enhanced due diligence, transaction monitoring, sanctions controls, training, testing, and management oversight. A risk assessment is not a prediction of individual criminal behavior. Instead, it provides a structured basis for applying proportionate controls and identifying areas where additional safeguards may be necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 199. Which practice supports effective AML governance?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Clearly defined responsibilities and management oversight<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> Allowing each employee to create separate AML rules<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> Avoiding documentation of compliance decisions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> Removing independent review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. Clearly defined responsibilities and management oversight<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Effective AML governance requires clear responsibilities, appropriate management oversight, accountability, and communication throughout the organization. Senior management and the board, where applicable, should understand the institution’s financial crime risk exposure and provide appropriate oversight of the AML framework. Roles should be clearly defined so employees understand who is responsible for customer due diligence, monitoring, investigations, sanctions screening, escalation, testing, and remediation. Governance should also include appropriate reporting and documentation. Strong governance does not mean management performs every operational task; rather, it ensures that responsibilities, authority, controls, and oversight are properly established.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 200. What is the overall objective of a risk-based AML program?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> To apply exactly the same controls to every customer<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> To eliminate all financial crime<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> To focus resources and controls according to identified financial crime risks<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> To avoid monitoring higher-risk relationships<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3. To focus resources and controls according to identified financial crime risks<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          The risk-based approach allows an institution to allocate AML resources and controls in proportion to the risks it identifies. Customers, products, services, delivery channels, transactions, and geographic relationships may present different levels and types of financial crime exposure. A risk-based program therefore applies stronger measures where risks are greater while maintaining appropriate controls across the broader customer base. The objective is not to eliminate every possible instance of financial crime, which cannot be guaranteed. Instead, institutions should identify, assess, mitigate, monitor, and periodically reassess their risks while maintaining effective governance, documentation, and regulatory compliance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full ACAMS CAMS Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 181. What is the primary purpose of ongoing customer due diligence? To eliminate the need for customer identification To continuously assess whether customer information and activity remain consistent with the relationship To guarantee that customers never conduct unusual transactions To replace transaction monitoring […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16253"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16253"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16253\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16281,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16253\/revisions\/16281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}