{"id":16257,"date":"2026-09-19T06:11:22","date_gmt":"2026-09-19T06:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=16257"},"modified":"2026-09-19T06:11:22","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T06:11:22","slug":"acams-cams-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-14-q261-280","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/acams-cams-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-14-q261-280\/","title":{"rendered":"ACAMS CAMS Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part 14 Q261-280"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

View Full <\/b>ACAMS CAMS Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/p>\n

Question 261. Which action best supports effective customer due diligence?<\/b><\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. <\/b> Reviewing customer information and understanding the purpose of the relationship<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> Relying only on the customer’s account balance<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> Avoiding transaction monitoring for established customers<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> Collecting information only after suspicious activity occurs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. Reviewing customer information and understanding the purpose of the relationship<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Customer due diligence is designed to help a financial institution understand who its customers are, why they are using its services, and whether their activities are consistent with the institution’s risk expectations. Reviewing identification information, understanding the nature and purpose of the relationship, assessing relevant risk factors, and maintaining appropriate ongoing monitoring are important components of an effective CDD process. An account balance by itself does not provide enough information to understand customer risk. CDD should also continue throughout the relationship rather than being performed only after suspicious activity is detected. A strong CDD framework helps institutions identify unusual behavior and apply appropriate controls based on the customer’s circumstances.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 262. What is a common indicator of potential money laundering involving rapid fund transfers?<\/b><\/h3>\n
      \n
    1. <\/b> Regular salary payments from an identified employer<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> Funds rapidly moving through several accounts without an apparent business purpose<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> A customer receiving a routine utility payment<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> A customer maintaining a stable account balance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Funds rapidly moving through several accounts without an apparent business purpose<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Rapid movement of funds through multiple accounts can be an indicator of layering, particularly when the transactions have no clear economic or legitimate business rationale. Money launderers may attempt to obscure the origin and ownership of funds by transferring money between accounts, entities, or jurisdictions. However, rapid transfers are not automatically suspicious because legitimate businesses may routinely move funds for operational reasons. The institution should consider the customer’s profile, expected activity, transaction history, counterparties, geographic exposure, and stated purpose before determining whether the activity requires escalation. The key concern is the combination of rapid movement, complexity, and lack of a reasonable explanation.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 263. Why is beneficial ownership information important in AML compliance?<\/b><\/h3>\n
        \n
      1. <\/b> It determines the customer’s preferred payment method<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> It identifies the customer’s credit score<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> It helps identify the natural persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> It replaces all transaction monitoring requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. It helps identify the natural persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Beneficial ownership information is important because legal entities can sometimes be used to conceal the identity of individuals who ultimately own or control assets or direct transactions. Identifying the natural persons behind a company helps a financial institution understand the actual parties associated with the relationship and assess the associated money laundering and terrorist financing risks. Complex ownership structures, nominee arrangements, offshore entities, and frequent changes in ownership can require additional investigation. Beneficial ownership information does not eliminate the need for transaction monitoring or other AML controls. Instead, it provides important context that allows institutions to evaluate customer risk more accurately and understand who ultimately exercises ownership or control.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 264. What should an institution consider when assessing a customer’s geographic risk?<\/b><\/h3>\n
          \n
        1. <\/b> Only the customer’s mailing address<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> The customer’s preferred currency<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> The number of employees at the institution<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> Connections to jurisdictions associated with higher AML or sanctions risks<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Connections to jurisdictions associated with higher AML or sanctions risks<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Geographic risk assessment considers the jurisdictions connected to a customer, transaction, business activity, or financial relationship. Relevant connections may include the customer’s residence, place of incorporation, operating locations, transaction destinations, counterparties, and countries through which funds are routed. Some jurisdictions may present increased risks because of deficiencies in AML controls, corruption concerns, sanctions exposure, organized crime, terrorist financing risks, or other factors identified through reliable risk assessments. Geographic exposure should not automatically make a customer suspicious. Instead, it is one factor within a broader risk-based assessment. Institutions should consider the nature, frequency, and purpose of geographic connections when determining whether additional controls are appropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 265. Which situation may justify enhanced due diligence?<\/b><\/h3>\n
            \n
          1. <\/b> A customer presents a higher level of AML risk based on relevant risk factors<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> A customer makes one ordinary purchase<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> A customer provides a valid telephone number<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> A customer receives a routine monthly payment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. A customer presents a higher level of AML risk based on relevant risk factors<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Enhanced due diligence is generally applied when a customer or relationship presents higher money laundering, terrorist financing, sanctions, or other financial crime risks. Risk factors can include complex ownership structures, high-risk geographic connections, politically exposed person status, unusual business models, large or complex transactions, adverse information, or activity inconsistent with the customer’s stated purpose. EDD may involve obtaining additional information, establishing source of funds or wealth, increasing monitoring, obtaining appropriate approvals, or conducting more detailed reviews. The precise measures depend on the institution’s risk assessment and applicable requirements. A routine transaction or ordinary customer information does not by itself justify enhanced due diligence.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 266. What is the primary purpose of transaction monitoring?<\/b><\/h3>\n
              \n
            1. <\/b> To increase customer account balances<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> To identify activity that may be inconsistent with expected or legitimate customer behavior<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> To eliminate all financial transactions<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> To replace customer identification procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. To identify activity that may be inconsistent with expected or legitimate customer behavior<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Transaction monitoring helps institutions identify activity that may warrant further investigation because it differs from a customer’s expected behavior or presents potential financial crime concerns. Monitoring may use rules, scenarios, thresholds, statistical methods, or other analytical techniques to identify unusual transaction patterns. Examples can include unexpected international transfers, rapid movement of funds, structuring, unusual cash activity, or transactions involving unexpected counterparties. An alert does not establish that money laundering or another offense has occurred. Instead, it creates a basis for investigation. Effective monitoring should be supported by reliable customer data, appropriate scenario calibration, investigation procedures, documentation, and escalation processes.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 267. What is structuring in the context of AML?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                \n
              1. <\/b> Combining several legitimate business departments<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> Creating a corporate organizational chart<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Dividing transactions to avoid detection or reporting requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> Consolidating all customer accounts into one account<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Dividing transactions to avoid detection or reporting requirements<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Structuring involves deliberately dividing transactions into smaller amounts or arranging transactions in a manner intended to avoid applicable reporting requirements, monitoring thresholds, or detection mechanisms. For example, an individual may conduct multiple cash transactions rather than one larger transaction in an attempt to avoid triggering a reporting requirement. Structuring can involve one person, multiple individuals, several accounts, or different locations. The presence of multiple smaller transactions does not automatically prove structuring because legitimate customers may also conduct transactions in that manner. Investigators should examine transaction timing, amounts, locations, customer behavior, relationships between parties, and other contextual information before determining whether the activity appears designed to evade controls.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 268. Why should AML customer information be updated periodically?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                  \n
                1. <\/b> Customer circumstances and risk factors can change over time<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> Account numbers automatically expire<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> Transaction monitoring becomes unnecessary after onboarding<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> Customers must change their identity every year<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 1. Customer circumstances and risk factors can change over time<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Customer risk is not necessarily static. A customer’s ownership structure, occupation, business activities, geographic exposure, source of wealth, expected transaction patterns, or other relevant circumstances may change during the relationship. Periodic reviews and event-driven updates help institutions maintain an accurate understanding of the customer and reassess whether existing controls remain appropriate. Outdated information can weaken transaction monitoring and cause investigators to misunderstand legitimate or unusual activity. Institutions should therefore establish procedures for refreshing customer information based on risk and relevant triggers. The frequency and depth of review may differ according to the customer’s risk level, relationship type, regulatory requirements, and changes identified during ongoing monitoring.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 269. Which activity may indicate potential misuse of a corporate account?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Payments clearly related to the company’s stated business<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> Regular payroll transactions matching the business profile<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> Routine supplier payments supported by business records<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> Large personal-looking transfers unrelated to the company’s stated business purpose<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 4. Large personal-looking transfers unrelated to the company’s stated business purpose<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A corporate account is generally expected to demonstrate activity that is reasonably connected to the company’s stated business purpose. Large personal-looking transfers, payments to unrelated individuals, unexplained transfers between businesses, or significant activity outside the company’s expected profile may indicate that an account is being used for purposes unrelated to its declared business. Such activity should be assessed in context rather than automatically treated as evidence of money laundering. Investigators can review invoices, contracts, counterparties, ownership information, transaction history, and explanations provided by the customer. If the activity cannot be reasonably explained, the institution may need to escalate the matter according to its AML investigation and reporting procedures.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 270. What is a key AML concern associated with shell companies?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                      \n
                    1. <\/b> They always conduct illegal activities<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> They may be used to obscure ownership, control, or the movement of funds<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> They cannot maintain bank accounts<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> They are prohibited in every jurisdiction<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. They may be used to obscure ownership, control, or the movement of funds<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Shell companies can have legitimate purposes, but they may also create AML risks when their ownership, control, business purpose, or financial activity is difficult to understand. Criminals may use layers of legal entities to obscure beneficial ownership, move funds between jurisdictions, or make transactions appear to have legitimate commercial origins. Institutions should therefore understand the company’s ownership structure, nature of business, expected activity, source of funds, and relationships with counterparties. A shell company should not automatically be considered suspicious solely because it has limited operations. Risk depends on the circumstances and the overall customer profile. Appropriate due diligence helps distinguish legitimate structures from arrangements presenting unexplained or elevated risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 271. What should an investigator do when an AML alert has a legitimate explanation?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Automatically file a suspicious activity report<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> Delete all records related to the alert<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> Document the rationale and evidence supporting the alert disposition<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> Ignore the alert without review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 3. Document the rationale and evidence supporting the alert disposition<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        When an alert is reviewed and determined to have a legitimate explanation, the institution should document why the activity does not require further escalation. Effective documentation normally identifies the relevant transactions, customer context, information reviewed, explanation obtained, supporting evidence, and reasoning behind the final disposition. This creates an audit trail showing that the alert was actually investigated rather than simply closed without consideration. A legitimate explanation does not necessarily mean that every future transaction involving the customer should be ignored. Continued monitoring should remain appropriate to the customer’s risk profile. Clear documentation also supports quality assurance, independent testing, regulatory examinations, and consistent decision-making across investigators.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 272. Which factor can increase the AML risk of a cash-intensive business?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Large volumes of cash that may make the true source of funds difficult to verify<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> Having a documented business address<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> Maintaining regular payroll records<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> Using a standard business checking account<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1. Large volumes of cash that may make the true source of funds difficult to verify<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Cash-intensive businesses can present increased AML risk because substantial amounts of physical currency can make it more difficult to establish the precise origin of funds. Businesses such as restaurants, retail operations, entertainment venues, or other cash-heavy enterprises may legitimately generate large cash volumes, so cash activity alone does not indicate wrongdoing. Institutions should compare deposits with the customer’s business model, location, reported revenues, historical activity, and other available information. Significant discrepancies between expected cash generation and actual deposits may warrant investigation. A risk-based approach allows institutions to apply appropriate monitoring without treating legitimate cash-based businesses as inherently suspicious.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 273. What is a potential AML concern with third-party payments?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                            \n
                          1. <\/b> The customer receives funds from an unrelated party without a clear economic rationale<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> The customer pays an established supplier under a documented contract<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> A company pays its employees through payroll<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> A customer pays a routine utility bill<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. The customer receives funds from an unrelated party without a clear economic rationale<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Third-party payments can present AML concerns when the relationship between the sender, recipient, and underlying transaction is unclear. An unexplained payment from an unrelated person or company may indicate an attempt to conceal the true source or destination of funds, facilitate fraud, or move money on behalf of another party. However, third-party payments can also be completely legitimate, such as payments made by authorized agents, business partners, family members, or settlement providers. Institutions should examine the customer’s profile, payment purpose, relationship between the parties, supporting documentation, and transaction pattern. The absence of a reasonable explanation or commercial rationale can increase the need for further review.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 274. Why is transaction history useful during an AML investigation?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                              \n
                            1. <\/b> It guarantees that a customer is legitimate<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> It replaces beneficial ownership information<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> It provides context for identifying changes or unusual patterns in customer activity<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> It eliminates the need for customer communication<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3. It provides context for identifying changes or unusual patterns in customer activity<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Transaction history gives investigators a broader view of how an account has been used over time. Comparing recent activity with historical patterns can reveal changes in transaction volume, counterparties, geographic exposure, cash usage, payment frequency, or transaction size. This context can help investigators determine whether an alert represents ordinary customer behavior or a meaningful deviation from the established profile. Historical activity should not be interpreted in isolation because legitimate business conditions can change. Investigators should also consider updated customer information, stated business purpose, source of funds, supporting documents, and relevant risk factors. A well-maintained transaction history therefore provides valuable context for evidence-based AML investigations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 275. What is a pass-through account?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                \n
                              1. <\/b> An account used primarily to receive and quickly transfer funds onward<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> An account used only for employee salaries<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> An account that cannot receive incoming payments<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> An account that remains permanently inactive<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. An account used primarily to receive and quickly transfer funds onward<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A pass-through account is generally characterized by funds entering an account and then being transferred onward relatively quickly, often with limited retention or apparent economic activity within the account itself. Such behavior can be legitimate in certain business models, including payment processing or treasury operations. However, unexplained pass-through activity can also be associated with layering or the movement of illicit funds. Investigators should examine transaction velocity, counterparties, payment descriptions, geographic connections, customer business purpose, and expected activity. The important consideration is whether the account activity is consistent with the customer’s legitimate business and known financial profile. Unexplained rapid movement can justify additional investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 276. What is an important consideration when monitoring international transactions?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Only the transaction amount matters<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> Geographic exposure, counterparties, purpose, and customer risk should be considered<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> International transactions are always suspicious<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> International transactions do not require monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2. Geographic exposure, counterparties, purpose, and customer risk should be considered<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  International transactions should be assessed using a combination of relevant risk factors rather than simply considering transaction value. Institutions may examine the jurisdictions involved, customer risk profile, counterparties, purpose of payment, transaction frequency, source and destination of funds, sanctions exposure, and whether the activity is consistent with the customer’s expected business. International activity is common for legitimate businesses and individuals, so cross-border transactions should not automatically be considered suspicious. The risk may increase when transactions involve higher-risk jurisdictions, opaque counterparties, unusual payment routes, or activity inconsistent with the customer’s profile. A risk-based monitoring process helps institutions identify transactions requiring closer examination.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 277. Which situation may require review of a customer’s risk rating?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> The customer changes their account password<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> The customer receives a routine statement<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> The customer makes a normal purchase within expected activity<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> The customer develops significant new geographic or business exposure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 4. The customer develops significant new geographic or business exposure<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A customer’s risk rating should be reassessed when material changes occur that could affect the financial crime risk associated with the relationship. Examples may include expansion into higher-risk jurisdictions, substantial changes in business activities, new ownership or control, significant increases in transaction volume, new products or services, adverse information, or other meaningful changes in the customer’s circumstances. Routine account activity does not normally require a risk-rating change by itself. A risk-based review allows institutions to determine whether existing CDD, EDD, transaction monitoring, and approval requirements remain appropriate. Timely reassessment is important because a customer’s risk profile can change significantly after the initial onboarding process.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 278. What is the purpose of AML employee training?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> To help employees recognize risks, follow procedures, and escalate suspicious activity appropriately<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> To teach employees how to avoid documenting transactions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> To eliminate the need for compliance policies<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> To allow employees to decide reporting requirements independently of procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1. To help employees recognize risks, follow procedures, and escalate suspicious activity appropriately<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      AML training helps employees understand the institution’s financial crime risks, internal policies, procedures, escalation requirements, and relevant responsibilities. Effective training should be appropriate to employees’ roles and should help staff recognize suspicious indicators, understand customer due diligence obligations, identify sanctions or other relevant risks, and know how to escalate concerns. Training should not replace written policies or established reporting processes. Institutions should maintain records demonstrating that required training was completed and should periodically assess whether training remains relevant. Role-based training is particularly useful because employees working in onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigations, operations, or management may encounter different AML risks and responsibilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 279. What should an AML compliance officer ensure regarding significant suspicious activity?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> That employees keep all concerns informal<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> That alerts are automatically closed<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> That appropriate escalation, investigation, and reporting procedures are followed<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> That customers are immediately informed of internal investigations<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3. That appropriate escalation, investigation, and reporting procedures are followed<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        An AML compliance officer plays an important role in overseeing the institution’s AML framework and ensuring that established processes are followed. When significant suspicious activity is identified, the institution should have procedures for escalation, investigation, documentation, and determining whether regulatory reporting is required. The compliance function should support consistent application of these processes and maintain appropriate governance and oversight. Employees should not be expected to handle significant concerns informally or make independent decisions outside established procedures. Confidentiality is also important because inappropriate disclosure of an investigation or potential report can create tipping-off concerns. Effective compliance oversight helps ensure suspicious activity is handled in a controlled and documented manner.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 280. What is a key characteristic of an effective risk-based AML program?<\/b><\/h3>\n
                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Applying identical controls to every customer regardless of risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> Eliminating customer due diligence for low-risk customers<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> Focusing only on transaction size<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> Allocating controls and resources according to identified financial crime risks<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. Allocating controls and resources according to identified financial crime risks<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          A risk-based AML program recognizes that customers, products, services, geographic areas, and delivery channels can present different levels of financial crime risk. Instead of applying exactly the same level of controls to every situation, an institution should identify and assess its risks and then allocate appropriate controls, monitoring, investigative resources, and due diligence measures accordingly. Higher-risk relationships may require enhanced due diligence and increased monitoring, while lower-risk relationships may be managed with proportionate controls consistent with applicable requirements. A risk-based approach does not mean eliminating fundamental AML obligations. It means using the institution’s resources in a way that reflects identified risks and supports effective prevention, detection, and reporting.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full ACAMS CAMS Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps Question 261. Which action best supports effective customer due diligence? Reviewing customer information and understanding the purpose of the relationship Relying only on the customer’s account balance Avoiding transaction monitoring for established customers Collecting information only after suspicious activity occurs Correct Answer: 1. Reviewing customer […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16257"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16257"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16277,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16257\/revisions\/16277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}