{"id":17527,"date":"2026-09-21T10:05:20","date_gmt":"2026-09-21T10:05:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=17527"},"modified":"2026-09-21T10:05:20","modified_gmt":"2026-09-21T10:05:20","slug":"crowdstrike-ccfr-201-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part5-q81-100","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/crowdstrike-ccfr-201-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part5-q81-100\/","title":{"rendered":"CrowdStrike CCFR-201 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part5 Q81-100"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>CrowdStrike CCFR-201 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 81.<\/b><\/p>\n

An analyst is investigating a suspicious executable and wants to identify the process that launched it. Which relationship should be reviewed first?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Parent process<\/span>
    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Child process<\/span>
    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Host group<\/span>
    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> User role<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. Parent process<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    The parent process identifies the process responsible for launching another process. Reviewing this relationship helps analysts determine how suspicious execution began and can reveal abnormal activity such as a document application starting a scripting engine or command shell. Child processes show what the suspicious executable launched afterward, but they do not explain its origin. Host groups and user roles provide administrative context rather than execution details. Examining the parent process is therefore the most direct way to understand how a suspicious executable was initiated during an investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 82.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A responder wants to determine whether a suspicious hash has appeared on other endpoints in the environment. Which search should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> User Search<\/span>
      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Hash Search<\/span>
      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> IP Search<\/span>
      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Domain Search<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Hash Search<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      Hash Search is the appropriate capability when an investigation begins with a file hash. It can help responders determine whether the same file has appeared elsewhere in the environment and identify potentially affected systems. This is useful for scoping incidents involving malware or suspicious executables. User Search focuses on accounts, IP Search focuses on network addresses, and Domain Search focuses on domain indicators. Matching the investigation tool to the indicator type helps improve efficiency and allows responders to quickly pivot from a known hash to related hosts or events.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 83.<\/b><\/p>\n

      An analyst wants a host-wide chronological view of activity surrounding a detection. Which capability is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Host Timeline<\/span>
        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Process Tree<\/span>
        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> User Search<\/span>
        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Hash management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1. Host Timeline<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Host Timeline provides chronological activity across an endpoint and is useful for reconstructing what happened before and after suspicious behavior. It gives a broader view than a process-specific investigation and can help identify related events that may otherwise be missed. Process Tree focuses on execution relationships rather than a complete timeline. User Search is centered on account activity, while hash management controls file handling. When the goal is to examine activity across a host over time, Host Timeline provides the most complete and relevant context.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 84.<\/b><\/p>\n

        A responder needs to remotely run approved commands on a compromised endpoint. Which capability should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Detection filters<\/span>
          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Bulk Domain Search<\/span>
          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Real Time Response<\/span>
          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> User Search<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 3. Real Time Response<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Real Time Response allows authorized responders to interact directly with supported endpoints during an investigation. Through RTR, analysts can execute approved commands, inspect files, collect evidence, and perform remediation actions remotely. Detection filters organize alerts, Bulk Domain Search investigates domain indicators, and User Search focuses on identity activity. None of those capabilities provide direct endpoint interaction. Because RTR can make meaningful changes to systems, access should be restricted to authorized personnel and response activity should be properly reviewed through audit records.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 85.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A file is seen on only two endpoints in a large enterprise. Which factor does this describe?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Internal prevalence<\/span>
            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Detection severity<\/span>
            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> User privilege<\/span>
            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Sensor policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Internal prevalence<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Internal prevalence describes how common or rare an artifact is within the organization’s own environment. A file seen on only two endpoints has low internal prevalence and may warrant further investigation, particularly if other suspicious indicators are present. However, low prevalence alone is not proof of maliciousness. Analysts should combine prevalence with process behavior, threat intelligence, network indicators, and other evidence. Detection severity, user privilege, and sensor policy provide different types of context and do not directly measure how frequently a file appears across enterprise systems.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 86.<\/b><\/p>\n

            A confirmed malicious hash should be prevented from executing. Which hash-management action is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Allow<\/span>
              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> No action<\/span>
              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Detect Only<\/span>
              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Block<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 4. Block<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Block is the appropriate action when a file hash has been confirmed as malicious and the organization wants to prevent the associated file from executing. Detect Only continues monitoring without applying the same prevention behavior, while Allow is intended for verified trusted files. No action does not provide protection against the malicious file. Before blocking a hash, responders should verify it carefully to avoid unintentionally disrupting legitimate software. The selected hash action should always align with the desired balance between prevention, detection visibility, and operational impact.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 87.<\/b><\/p>\n

              An analyst needs to investigate activity associated with a specific employee account. Which capability should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> User Search<\/span>
                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Hash Search<\/span>
                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> IP Search<\/span>
                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Process Timeline<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1. User Search<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                User Search is designed for investigations centered on a particular account or username. It can help analysts identify where the account has been observed and provide context that can be correlated with detections, processes, and host activity. Hash Search focuses on file indicators, while IP Search focuses on network addresses. Process Timeline provides process-centered chronological context rather than an identity-centered view. When a suspected account is the starting point of an investigation, User Search provides the most direct and useful entry point.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 88.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A suspicious external IP address appears in a detection. Which search is best for determining whether other endpoints communicated with it?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> User Search<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> IP Search<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Hash Search<\/span>
                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Process Tree<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 2. IP Search<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  IP Search is the correct capability when the investigation begins with a network address. It can help identify related endpoint activity and determine whether multiple systems communicated with the suspicious IP. This is particularly useful for command-and-control, suspicious remote infrastructure, or other network indicators. User Search is focused on accounts, Hash Search on files, and Process Tree on execution relationships. Starting with IP Search helps responders gather network-specific context and identify hosts or events that may require deeper investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 89.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  An analyst wants to reduce a large list of detections to only unresolved critical alerts. What should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> RTR scripts<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Detection filters<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Hash blocking<\/span>
                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Sensor exclusions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 2. Detection filters<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Detection filters allow responders to narrow large alert queues using criteria such as severity, status, host, or other available attributes. This makes triage more efficient by allowing the analyst to focus on the highest-priority unresolved detections. RTR scripts perform endpoint actions, while hash blocking changes file enforcement. Sensor exclusions can reduce visibility and should not be used simply to organize detection queues. Filtering is the correct approach when the goal is to prioritize and manage detections without changing endpoint security behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 90.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A responder wants to examine activity tied specifically to one suspicious process rather than all host activity. Which capability should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> User Search<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Process Timeline<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Host Search<\/span>
                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Bulk Domain Search<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Process Timeline<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Process Timeline focuses an investigation on activity associated with a specific process. It is useful when the analyst has already identified a suspicious executable and wants to understand what events occurred around it. Host-level views provide broader endpoint context, while User Search and Bulk Domain Search focus on different types of indicators. Process Timeline gives the responder a more targeted view and helps reduce unrelated noise, making it easier to understand the behavior and sequence of events associated with the suspicious process.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 91.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A responder wants to verify which analyst executed commands during an RTR session. What should be reviewed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Process Tree<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> RTR audit logs<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Hash prevalence<\/span>
                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Detection severity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 2. RTR audit logs<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        RTR audit logs provide an accountability record for actions performed during Real Time Response sessions. They can help determine which responder initiated commands and provide supporting evidence for incident documentation, governance, and troubleshooting. Process Tree focuses on endpoint execution activity, while hash prevalence indicates how common a file is. Detection severity helps prioritize alerts but does not identify administrative actions. When the goal is to determine who performed specific RTR actions, audit information is the appropriate source.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 92.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A security team receives a list of 50 suspicious domains and needs to investigate them efficiently. Which capability should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Bulk Domain Search<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Host Timeline<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> User Search<\/span>
                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Process Tree<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1. Bulk Domain Search<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Bulk Domain Search is intended for investigations involving multiple domain indicators. It allows responders to check a large collection of suspicious domains more efficiently than searching each one through separate workflows. This is useful when threat intelligence supplies domains related to phishing, malware delivery, or command-and-control infrastructure. Host Timeline and Process Tree focus on endpoint behavior, while User Search focuses on identities. For a large domain list, Bulk Domain Search provides the most efficient way to determine whether those indicators have appeared within the environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 93.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A suspicious command shell was launched by an unknown process. Which view best helps visualize the entire parent-child execution chain?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Process Tree<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>2.<\/b> IP Search<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>3.<\/b> User Search<\/span>
                            \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Hash management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. Process Tree<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Process Tree provides a hierarchical representation of parent and child process relationships. It allows the analyst to see what launched the suspicious command shell and what processes the shell may have created afterward. This is valuable for reconstructing multi-stage execution chains and identifying abnormal relationships. IP Search and User Search investigate other types of evidence, while hash management changes file handling. When the investigation requires a clear visual representation of execution ancestry and descendants, Process Tree is the most appropriate view.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 94.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            An analyst confirms that a file is legitimate enterprise software and should be permitted. Which hash action should be selected?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Block<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Detect Only<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Allow<\/span>
                              \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Block and Hide Detection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3. Allow<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Allow is appropriate when a file has been verified as trusted and should be permitted according to organizational policy. The responder should confirm the hash and legitimacy of the software before applying this action because allowing an incorrect file could reduce protection. Block prevents execution, while Detect Only maintains monitoring without applying the same blocking behavior. Block and Hide Detection is intended for a different prevention and visibility outcome. For confirmed legitimate software that should execute normally, Allow is the correct hash-management choice.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 95.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              An analyst wants to investigate detailed enterprise event telemetry related to a detection. Which capability is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Event Advanced Search<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>2.<\/b> User role configuration<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Sensor uninstall<\/span>
                                \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Host grouping<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Event Advanced Search<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Event Advanced Search allows responders to examine detailed endpoint telemetry beyond the initial detection information. It helps analysts search related events, refine results, and pivot through evidence to determine the scope and sequence of suspicious activity. User role configuration, sensor uninstall, and host grouping are administrative functions and do not provide detailed event analysis. When a responder needs to expand a detection investigation and examine enterprise telemetry in greater depth, Event Advanced Search is the appropriate capability.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 96.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A repeated false positive is caused by legitimate software. What is the best practice before creating an exclusion?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Exclude the entire disk<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Disable prevention globally<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Validate the behavior and minimize the exclusion scope<\/span>
                                  \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Ignore all future alerts from the endpoint<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 3. Validate the behavior and minimize the exclusion scope<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Exclusions should be created only after confirming that the activity is genuinely legitimate and understanding how the selected exclusion type will affect security visibility or prevention. The scope should be as narrow as possible to reduce the risk of introducing a blind spot. Excluding an entire disk or disabling prevention globally would create unnecessary security exposure. Ignoring future alerts is also risky because later activity may be unrelated and malicious. Careful validation and narrow scoping provide the best balance between reducing false positives and maintaining security coverage.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 97.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  In MITRE ATT&CK, which term describes the high-level objective an adversary is attempting to achieve?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Technique<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Tactic<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Detection<\/span>
                                    \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Indicator<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 2. Tactic<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A tactic represents a high-level adversary objective in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Examples include Initial Access, Persistence, Credential Access, Discovery, and Exfiltration. Techniques describe the methods attackers use to achieve those objectives. Understanding this distinction helps responders interpret ATT&CK mappings and understand where suspicious activity fits within a broader attack chain. Detection and indicator are general security terms but do not represent the specific ATT&CK concept of an adversary’s overarching objective.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 98.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A security team wants to standardize a recurring sequence of RTR remediation commands. What should be created?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> A custom RTR script<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>2.<\/b> A host group<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>3.<\/b> A sensor exclusion<\/span>
                                      \n<\/span>4.<\/b> A detection filter<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1. A custom RTR script<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A custom RTR script allows authorized responders to package repeatable command sequences into a reusable remediation workflow. This improves consistency, reduces manual typing errors, and can make response operations more efficient. Scripts should be tested and appropriately controlled because they can perform powerful actions on endpoints. Host groups organize systems, sensor exclusions affect visibility or detection behavior, and detection filters organize alerts. None of those options execute a recurring response procedure. A custom RTR script is therefore the best way to standardize repeated remediation tasks.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 99.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      An analyst needs to determine whether a detection is isolated or part of a broader compromise. Which approach is best?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Review only the original alert<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Correlate host, user, process, hash, and network evidence<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Close the detection immediately<\/span>
                                        \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Disable endpoint telemetry<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2. Correlate host, user, process, hash, and network evidence<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Incident scoping requires combining multiple evidence sources rather than relying on a single alert. The analyst should review related hosts, user accounts, process relationships, hashes, network indicators, timelines, and event data to determine whether the same activity exists elsewhere. Reviewing only the original alert may miss related compromise, while closing it prematurely could leave an incident unresolved. Disabling endpoint telemetry would make the investigation more difficult. Correlating multiple evidence types provides a more complete view of the incident and helps determine its true scope.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 100.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        An analyst identifies a suspicious executable that launches several additional processes. What is the most appropriate next step?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Review child processes and related event activity<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>2.<\/b> Delete the detection immediately<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>3.<\/b> Disable logging on the host<\/span>
                                          \n<\/span>4.<\/b> Remove the endpoint from all host groups<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 1. Review child processes and related event activity<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Reviewing child processes and related events helps the analyst understand what actions occurred after the suspicious executable started. The downstream processes may reveal discovery commands, credential theft, persistence, lateral movement, or other malicious behavior. This information is essential for reconstructing the attack chain and determining the necessary response. Deleting the detection would remove useful context, while disabling logging would reduce visibility. Host group membership does not explain process behavior. Examining child processes and associated events is therefore the most appropriate next investigative step.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full CrowdStrike CCFR-201 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 81. An analyst is investigating a suspicious executable and wants to identify the process that launched it. Which relationship should be reviewed first? Parent process 2. Child process 3. Host group 4. User role Correct Answer: 1. Parent process Explanation: The parent process […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17527"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17527"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17527\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17528,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17527\/revisions\/17528"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}