{"id":18865,"date":"2026-09-22T10:22:32","date_gmt":"2026-09-22T10:22:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=18865"},"modified":"2026-09-22T10:22:32","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T10:22:32","slug":"servicenow-cis-rc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part6-q101-120","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/servicenow-cis-rc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part6-q101-120\/","title":{"rendered":"ServiceNow CIS-RC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part6 Q101-120"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/cis-rc-exam-dumps\"><b>ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 101.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization wants to identify which business areas are affected by a particular risk. Which relationship is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk linked to the relevant business entity<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy linked to a browser version<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control linked to a user theme<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue linked only to an email message<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Risk linked to the relevant business entity<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Linking a risk to the relevant business entity provides context about where the exposure exists. The entity might represent a business unit, application, process, vendor, or another scoped object. This supports reporting, ownership, prioritization, and assessment. Management can also compare risk exposure across different entities. Browser versions and user themes do not provide meaningful business-risk context, while issue tracking through email alone does not create structured organizational relationships.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 102.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control is appropriately designed, but evidence shows it was performed only sporadically during the review period. What is the primary concern?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document completeness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control operating effectiveness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy ownership<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Entity classification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Control operating effectiveness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Operating effectiveness focuses on whether a control is consistently performed as intended over time. A well-designed control can still fail to reduce risk if it is executed only occasionally or inconsistently. Assessment evidence can help determine whether the control actually operated throughout the required period. A design effectiveness problem would exist if the control itself could not achieve its intended objective even when properly performed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 103.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk assessment uses probability and business consequence to determine exposure. Which two concepts are being evaluated?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy and evidence<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control and issue<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Likelihood and impact<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Owner and reviewer<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Likelihood and impact<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Likelihood measures the probability that a risk event will occur, while impact measures the potential consequence if it does. These two dimensions are commonly combined to determine a risk score or severity level. Organizations may use qualitative scales, quantitative values, or custom methodologies, but likelihood and impact remain common inputs. Policies and evidence support other parts of the risk and compliance process but are not equivalent to probability and consequence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 104.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization completely stops an activity because its risk exceeds acceptable levels. Which risk treatment is being applied?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Avoidance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk avoidance means eliminating the activity that creates the exposure. When an organization stops the activity completely, it removes the source of the risk rather than trying to reduce, transfer, or accept it. Mitigation uses controls to reduce likelihood or impact, transfer shifts some exposure to another party, and acceptance means consciously retaining the risk. Avoidance is appropriate when the exposure is considered unacceptable and cannot be managed sufficiently through other treatments.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 105.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A regulatory requirement is supported by several internal policies and controls. What is the main benefit of maintaining these relationships?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Better compliance traceability and impact analysis<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Automatic elimination of all related risks<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Removal of all future assessment requirements<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Automatic closure of issues<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Better compliance traceability and impact analysis<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Relationships among requirements, policies, and controls allow the organization to understand how an external obligation is interpreted internally and which safeguards support compliance. If the requirement changes, related policies and controls can be identified quickly. Likewise, a control failure can be traced back to affected requirements. These relationships improve governance and audit readiness but do not eliminate risks, assessments, or remediation activities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 106.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An assessor needs proof that a quarterly access review was actually completed. Which item should be requested?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk appetite statement<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control evidence<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document title<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy publication date<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Control evidence<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Control evidence provides objective support that a control was performed. For an access review, evidence might include review reports, approvals, sign-offs, system logs, or related documentation. Evidence allows the assessor to evaluate whether the control operated as intended rather than relying only on verbal confirmation. Risk appetite and policy dates are important governance information but do not prove that the specific control activity was completed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 107.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control deficiency has been identified and needs assigned ownership, a target date, and corrective actions. Which record should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge Article<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog Item<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Offering<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Issue<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An issue provides a structured way to manage a control or compliance deficiency through remediation. It can capture the problem, assign an owner, establish target dates, define corrective actions, and track progress to closure. This creates accountability and visibility. Knowledge articles and catalog items do not provide the same remediation lifecycle for identified governance, risk, or compliance weaknesses.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 108.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A company purchases insurance to limit the financial impact of a potential loss. Which risk response is this?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Transfer<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk transfer moves part of the financial or operational consequence of a risk to another party. Insurance is a common example because the insurer assumes specified losses according to the policy terms. The underlying event may still occur, so the risk is not eliminated. Mitigation reduces exposure through controls, avoidance eliminates the activity, and acceptance means the organization chooses to retain the remaining risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 109.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk has a high inherent score, but strong controls reduce the remaining exposure substantially. Which measure captures the lower remaining exposure?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Residual risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Inherent risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Gross policy risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Residual risk<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Residual risk represents the exposure remaining after controls and treatment activities are considered. Inherent risk reflects the exposure before controls. Comparing the two provides insight into how much risk reduction the control environment is providing. If residual risk remains within the organization\u2019s tolerance or appetite, additional treatment may not be necessary. If it remains too high, further mitigation or another response may be required.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 110.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control owner must periodically confirm that a required activity is still being performed. Which process is most suitable?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Change request<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Attestation or assessment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog request<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Problem investigation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Attestation or assessment<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An attestation or assessment can be used to obtain periodic confirmation that a control continues to operate. The control owner may answer structured questions, certify statements, or provide supporting evidence. This creates a repeatable assurance mechanism and helps identify controls that are no longer functioning as intended. Change requests and catalog requests support different operational processes and do not provide the same control verification function.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 111.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization adds additional monitoring and approval steps to reduce fraudulent transactions. Which risk treatment is being used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Mitigation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mitigation involves implementing safeguards intended to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. Additional monitoring and approval steps make fraudulent transactions harder to complete and can improve detection. The organization continues the underlying business activity but strengthens its controls. Avoidance would stop the activity, transfer would shift some exposure to another party, and acceptance would retain the risk without additional treatment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 112.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control supports requirements from four different regulatory frameworks. What is the main advantage of mapping all four requirements to the same control?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The control will never need testing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> All related risks are automatically accepted<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policies become unnecessary<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Duplicate compliance work can be reduced**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Duplicate compliance work can be reduced<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mapping multiple requirements to one control helps organizations reuse the same safeguard, evidence, and testing activities across overlapping frameworks. This can reduce redundant controls and repeated compliance work. It also improves traceability and makes impact analysis easier if the control fails. The mapping does not remove the need for testing or policies and does not automatically change the treatment of related risks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 113.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A policy is revised and management wants employees to formally confirm that they have read it. Which process best supports this?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy acknowledgment or attestation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control retirement<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document replacement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Policy acknowledgment or attestation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy acknowledgment or attestation provides evidence that designated employees have reviewed or accepted updated policy content. This can support governance, awareness, and audit requirements. It does not prove that related controls are operating effectively, so control testing may still be required. Risk acceptance and authority document management address different parts of the governance and compliance lifecycle.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 114.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control is performed consistently, but even perfect execution cannot adequately address the intended risk. What is the issue?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Operating effectiveness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Design effectiveness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk ownership<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evidence retention<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Design effectiveness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Design effectiveness asks whether the control is capable of achieving its intended objective. If the control cannot sufficiently reduce the risk even when employees perform it exactly as designed, then the problem lies in the control design. The organization may need to redesign or replace the safeguard. Operating effectiveness refers to whether a properly designed control is consistently performed in practice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 115.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk owner decides that the residual exposure is within approved tolerance and formally chooses to retain it. Which response applies?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Acceptance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk acceptance occurs when authorized stakeholders consciously decide to retain the remaining exposure because it is within tolerance or because further treatment is not justified. The decision should generally be documented and approved according to governance requirements. Acceptance does not make the risk disappear. Instead, it confirms that the organization understands and is willing to retain the residual exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 116.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A compliance requirement changes. Which information is most useful for determining what internal records may need review?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> User-interface settings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Password reset history<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser compatibility data<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Relationships among the requirement, policies, controls, and risks**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Relationships among the requirement, policies, controls, and risks<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Connected relationships make impact analysis much easier when an obligation changes. The organization can identify which policies interpret the requirement, which controls address it, and which risks or entities may be affected. Without these mappings, teams may need to manually search across many disconnected documents. Maintaining accurate relationships is therefore a key part of scalable compliance management and regulatory change analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 117.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why should identified remediation work have a clear owner and due date?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To establish accountability and make overdue work visible<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To eliminate the need for control assessments<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To automatically reduce inherent risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To replace policy governance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. To establish accountability and make overdue work visible<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Clear ownership identifies who is responsible for completing remediation, while a due date establishes the expected timeframe. Together with status tracking and corrective actions, these fields help management identify overdue work and escalate unresolved deficiencies. They do not automatically reduce risk or eliminate the need for assessments. Accountability is essential for ensuring that identified control and compliance weaknesses are actually corrected.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 118.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A manager wants to know why a control failure could affect several compliance frameworks at once. Which concept explains this?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Shared control mapping<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Entity retirement<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy acknowledgment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Shared control mapping<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A shared control may be mapped to requirements from several frameworks. If that control fails, every requirement that depends on it may be affected. Maintaining these mappings allows the organization to quickly identify the broader compliance impact of a deficiency. This is one reason shared controls can improve efficiency while also making relationship management important. Policy acknowledgment and risk acceptance do not explain cross-framework dependency.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 119.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control test fails and management believes the related risk exposure has increased. What should happen next?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the control<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Close the risk automatically<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Record the deficiency and reassess the risk as appropriate<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove the related regulation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Record the deficiency and reassess the risk as appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A failed control may reduce the expected level of mitigation and therefore increase residual risk. The deficiency should be documented and remediation initiated. The related risk should also be reviewed to determine whether its current score still reflects actual exposure. Automatically deleting the control or closing the risk would hide the problem rather than manage it. The regulatory requirement remains relevant even when a control fails.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 120.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice best supports consistent and scalable Risk and Compliance operations?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep risks, controls, and policies in unrelated spreadsheets<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Track remediation only through email<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid linking requirements to controls<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain accurate connected data for entities, risks, controls, policies, requirements, assessments, evidence, issues, and remediation**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Maintain accurate connected data for entities, risks, controls, policies, requirements, assessments, evidence, issues, and remediation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Scalable Risk and Compliance operations depend on structured, connected, and current data. Entities provide context, risks represent exposure, controls provide mitigation, policies and requirements define obligations, assessments and evidence support assurance, and issues manage remediation. Relationships among these records improve reporting, impact analysis, accountability, and audit readiness. Disconnected spreadsheets and email-only tracking become difficult to manage as the number of risks, controls, and regulatory obligations increases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 101. An organization wants to identify which business areas are affected by a particular risk. Which relationship is most useful? Risk linked to the relevant business entity 2. Policy linked to a browser version 3. Control linked to a user theme 4. Issue [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18865"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18865"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18865\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18866,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18865\/revisions\/18866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}