{"id":18870,"date":"2026-09-22T10:24:12","date_gmt":"2026-09-22T10:24:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=18870"},"modified":"2026-09-22T10:24:12","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T10:24:12","slug":"servicenow-cis-rc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/servicenow-cis-rc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160\/","title":{"rendered":"ServiceNow CIS-RC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part8 Q141-160"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/cis-rc-exam-dumps\"><b>ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 141.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization wants to understand whether a policy requirement is actually supported by an implemented safeguard. Which relationship is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy requirement linked to the relevant control<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk linked to a browser version<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue linked to a UI theme<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document linked to a catalog item<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Policy requirement linked to the relevant control<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Linking policy or compliance requirements to the controls that support them creates traceability between what the organization expects and how those expectations are implemented. This relationship is useful for audits, impact analysis, and compliance reporting. If a control fails, reviewers can identify which requirements may be affected. Browser versions, UI themes, and catalog items do not provide meaningful evidence that an organizational requirement is being supported by an operational safeguard.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 142.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk is rated as critical before controls are considered but moderate after existing controls are applied. Which value represents the moderate level?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Inherent risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Residual risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Accepted risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transferred risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Residual risk<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Residual risk is the amount of exposure remaining after existing controls and other treatments are considered. Inherent risk represents the exposure before controls are applied. Comparing these values helps management understand how much risk reduction the control environment provides. The remaining residual exposure can then be compared with risk tolerance or appetite to determine whether more mitigation, transfer, avoidance, or formal acceptance is necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 143.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control owner submits screenshots and system-generated reports during an assessment. What are these items primarily used as?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk appetite data<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy ownership records<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control evidence<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority documents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Control evidence<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Screenshots, reports, logs, approvals, and similar records can serve as control evidence when they demonstrate that a control was actually performed. Assessors use evidence to support conclusions about design or operating effectiveness. Evidence strengthens assurance by reducing reliance on unsupported statements. Risk appetite defines the amount of exposure an organization is willing to tolerate, while authority documents represent regulations or standards rather than proof of control execution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 144.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A business process creates unacceptable exposure, so management permanently discontinues the process. Which response is being used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Avoidance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk avoidance eliminates the activity that creates the exposure. By permanently discontinuing the process, management removes the source of the risk rather than attempting to reduce, transfer, or accept it. Mitigation would introduce safeguards while continuing the activity, transfer would shift part of the consequences to another party, and acceptance would retain the exposure. Avoidance is appropriate when the activity itself is no longer considered acceptable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 145.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which record should be used to track corrective work after a failed compliance assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge Article<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Offering<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog Item<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Issue<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An issue provides a structured mechanism for managing identified deficiencies and remediation. It can include an assigned owner, target date, corrective actions, status, and supporting information. This creates accountability and allows management to monitor progress toward resolution. Knowledge articles and catalog items serve different purposes and are not designed to manage the lifecycle of compliance or control deficiencies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 146.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization wants to know whether a control is consistently performed throughout the year. Which aspect should be assessed?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk appetite<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Operating effectiveness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document scope<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy publication format<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Operating effectiveness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Operating effectiveness evaluates whether a control is consistently executed as intended during the relevant period. A control can be well designed but ineffective in practice if employees skip steps, perform it inconsistently, or fail to retain evidence. Control testing or assessments can help determine whether the activity operated reliably. Design effectiveness instead considers whether the control is capable of achieving its intended objective when properly performed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 147.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A company wants to organize risks according to the applications, processes, and business units they affect. Which concept is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy acknowledgment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control retirement<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Business entities<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge categories<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Business entities<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Business entities provide context for scoping risks, controls, and compliance activities to specific parts of the organization. An entity may represent a business unit, application, process, vendor, or another object depending on the implementation. Linking risks to entities makes entity-based reporting and assessments possible and helps management understand where exposure exists. Knowledge categories and policy acknowledgment do not provide the same organizational risk-scoping capability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 148.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A company signs a contract requiring a third party to absorb certain financial consequences of a business event. Which risk treatment does this represent?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Transfer<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk transfer shifts some portion of the financial or operational consequence of a risk to another party. Contracts, insurance, and outsourcing arrangements can sometimes be used for this purpose. The underlying risk may still exist, but the distribution of its consequences changes. Mitigation reduces exposure through safeguards, avoidance removes the activity, and acceptance means consciously retaining the risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 149.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which relationship helps an organization determine which regulatory obligations may be affected when a shared control fails?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control-to-requirement mappings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> User-to-role mappings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Asset-to-location mappings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge-to-category mappings<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Control-to-requirement mappings<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Control-to-requirement mappings show which regulatory, standards-based, or internal obligations depend on a particular control. If a shared control fails, these relationships allow compliance teams to identify all potentially affected obligations quickly. This supports impact analysis, issue prioritization, and regulatory reporting. User-role and knowledge-category mappings do not provide the necessary compliance dependency information.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 150.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control owner must formally confirm twice a year that a control remains in place and operating. Which mechanism best supports this requirement?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident assignment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Attestation or assessment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Change implementation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog fulfillment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Attestation or assessment<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An attestation or assessment can be scheduled periodically to obtain confirmation that a control remains in place and continues to operate. The owner may answer structured questions, certify statements, or provide supporting evidence. This creates a repeatable assurance process and helps identify controls that have degraded over time. Incident and catalog processes do not provide the same governance-focused verification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 151.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk assessment shows high likelihood but very low business consequence. Which second factor is represented by the low consequence?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evidence<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control design<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Impact<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy scope<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Impact<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Impact represents the consequence of a risk event if it occurs, while likelihood represents how probable the event is. These two dimensions are commonly used together to evaluate overall risk exposure. Organizations may define impact in financial, operational, legal, reputational, or other terms depending on their methodology. Evidence and control design are important parts of risk and compliance processes but do not represent the consequence dimension of a risk score.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 152.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A policy has changed and management wants documented confirmation that affected employees reviewed the new version. What should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control testing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document import<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy acknowledgment or attestation**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Policy acknowledgment or attestation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy acknowledgment or attestation provides evidence that designated users have reviewed or formally acknowledged a policy. This supports governance, employee awareness, and audit readiness. It does not prove that related controls are operating effectively, so control testing may still be required. Risk acceptance and authority document management serve different purposes and do not directly confirm employee review of policy content.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 153.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control is performed perfectly but is still incapable of reducing the intended risk. What should be improved?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control design<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Operating frequency only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk owner assignment only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy acknowledgment frequency<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Control design<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If a control cannot achieve its intended objective even when performed correctly, the problem lies in design effectiveness. The organization may need to redesign the safeguard, introduce additional controls, or replace it entirely. Operating effectiveness would be the concern if a properly designed control were not being executed consistently. Improving frequency alone would not solve a control that is fundamentally incapable of reducing the intended risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 154.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk owner concludes that the remaining exposure is acceptable and formally approves retaining it. Which response applies?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Acceptance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk acceptance means authorized stakeholders knowingly retain residual exposure because it falls within approved tolerance or because further treatment is not justified. The decision should generally be documented and governed according to organizational policy. Acceptance does not remove the risk. Instead, it confirms that management understands the remaining exposure and is willing to retain it under current conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 155.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A regulation changes and the compliance team wants to identify all related policies and controls immediately. What is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> User-interface personalization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge article ratings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Accurate relationship mapping<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser compatibility records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Accurate relationship mapping<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Accurate relationships among authority requirements, policies, controls, risks, and entities allow the organization to perform rapid impact analysis when a regulation changes. Compliance teams can identify which internal safeguards and documents may need review rather than manually searching through disconnected records. This traceability is one of the major benefits of maintaining a connected risk and compliance data model.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 156.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control deficiency remains unresolved because no one is clearly accountable for correcting it. Which change would most directly improve the process?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Publish another policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove the issue due date<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reduce assessment frequency<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assign a remediation owner and target date**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Assign a remediation owner and target date<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remediation requires clear accountability. Assigning an owner identifies who is responsible for correcting the deficiency, while a target date establishes the expected timeframe. Status and remediation actions can then be tracked and overdue work escalated. Publishing more policies or reducing assessments does not address the underlying lack of responsibility. Structured ownership and deadlines are fundamental to effective issue management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 157.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization adds stronger access restrictions to reduce unauthorized system use. Which risk treatment is being applied?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Mitigation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stronger access restrictions are a form of mitigation because they are intended to reduce the likelihood or impact of unauthorized activity. The organization continues using the system but introduces additional safeguards. Transfer would shift some consequences to another party, avoidance would stop the activity entirely, and acceptance would retain the risk without further treatment. Controls are a common mechanism for implementing risk mitigation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 158.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A shared control supports multiple compliance frameworks. Why is this valuable?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It guarantees compliance permanently<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It can reduce duplicate controls, evidence collection, and testing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates the need for policies<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It prevents all assessment failures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. It can reduce duplicate controls, evidence collection, and testing<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A shared control can support several overlapping obligations, allowing organizations to reuse the same safeguard across multiple frameworks. This can reduce duplicate control definitions, evidence requests, and testing effort while improving traceability. The control still needs to remain effective and may require periodic assessment. Shared control mapping improves efficiency but does not permanently guarantee compliance or eliminate the need for policy governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 159.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A major control failure is discovered. What should happen to the related risk if the failed control was expected to provide significant mitigation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The risk should automatically be deleted<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The risk should automatically be accepted<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The risk should be reassessed as appropriate<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The risk owner should always be removed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. The risk should be reassessed as appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A significant control failure may mean the organization is receiving less mitigation than previously assumed. Residual exposure could therefore be higher than the current risk record indicates. Reassessing the risk helps determine whether its likelihood, impact, or residual score should change and whether additional treatment is required. The control deficiency should also be documented and remediated. Automatic deletion or acceptance would not reflect sound risk management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 160.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which approach best supports scalable Risk and Compliance management across many regulations and business units?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Track controls independently in spreadsheets<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use email as the primary remediation tool<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid connecting risks to business entities<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain structured relationships among entities, risks, controls, requirements, policies, assessments, evidence, issues, and remediation**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Maintain structured relationships among entities, risks, controls, requirements, policies, assessments, evidence, issues, and remediation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Scalable Risk and Compliance management depends on connected and reliable information. Business entities provide context, risks represent exposure, controls provide mitigation, requirements and policies define obligations, assessments and evidence support assurance, and issues track remediation. Maintaining these relationships improves reporting, traceability, impact analysis, and accountability across complex compliance environments. Disconnected spreadsheets and email-based tracking become difficult to govern as regulations, controls, and organizational scope expand.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 141. An organization wants to understand whether a policy requirement is actually supported by an implemented safeguard. Which relationship is most useful? Policy requirement linked to the relevant control 2. Risk linked to a browser version 3. Issue linked to a UI theme [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18870"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18871,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18870\/revisions\/18871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}