{"id":18884,"date":"2026-09-22T10:26:50","date_gmt":"2026-09-22T10:26:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=18884"},"modified":"2026-09-22T10:26:50","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T10:26:50","slug":"servicenow-cis-rc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part15-q281-300","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/servicenow-cis-rc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part15-q281-300\/","title":{"rendered":"ServiceNow CIS-RC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part15 Q281-300"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/cis-rc-exam-dumps\"><b>ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 281.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization wants to know which controls contribute to reducing a particular enterprise risk. Which relationship is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk-to-control relationship<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy-to-browser relationship<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue-to-theme relationship<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge-to-catalog relationship<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Risk-to-control relationship<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The relationship between a risk and its mitigating controls shows which safeguards are expected to reduce the organization\u2019s exposure. This helps explain the difference between inherent and residual risk and supports impact analysis when a control fails or changes. Risk owners can use these relationships to understand which controls are most important to their treatment strategy. Browser settings, themes, and catalog relationships do not provide meaningful information about risk mitigation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 282.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control is designed correctly but is skipped during several required review periods. Which aspect is primarily deficient?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authority document mapping<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Operating effectiveness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy publication<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Entity ownership<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Operating effectiveness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Operating effectiveness evaluates whether a control is performed consistently and correctly in practice. A well-designed control may still fail if required activities are skipped or performed irregularly. Assessment evidence can reveal these execution gaps. Design effectiveness would be the concern if the control itself could not achieve its intended objective even when performed correctly. In this situation, the main weakness is inconsistent operation rather than poor design.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 283.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A compliance analyst needs to represent one specific obligation contained within a broader industry standard. Which record is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Citation or requirement record<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Offering<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Citation or requirement record<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A citation or requirement record represents a specific obligation within a broader authority document such as a regulation, law, or standard. This makes it possible to map individual requirements to internal controls and policies. The structure improves compliance traceability and supports impact analysis when standards change. Risk and issue records serve different governance purposes and do not represent the underlying external obligation itself.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 284.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A company stops a product line completely because the associated risk cannot be reduced to an acceptable level. Which response is being used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Avoidance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk avoidance eliminates the activity that creates the exposure. By ending the product line, the organization removes the source of the risk instead of continuing the activity with additional safeguards. Mitigation reduces the risk through controls, transfer shifts some consequences to another party, and acceptance means knowingly retaining the remaining exposure. Avoidance is generally used when management concludes that the activity is too risky to continue.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 285.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A failed assessment creates a deficiency that must be assigned, corrected, and tracked to closure. Which record should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge Article<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog Item<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Request<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Issue<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An issue provides a structured remediation lifecycle for deficiencies identified through assessments or audits. It can capture ownership, target dates, corrective actions, status, and supporting information. This helps ensure that compliance or control weaknesses are tracked through completion and that overdue items can be escalated. Knowledge articles and catalog records support different functions and are not designed for governance-focused remediation tracking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 286.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An auditor asks for reports and approval records proving that a control was completed during the review period. What is being requested?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk appetite<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control evidence<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Entity classification<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy scope<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Control evidence<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Control evidence provides objective support that a control activity was actually performed. Examples can include reports, logs, approvals, screenshots, reconciliations, and other records relevant to the control. Evidence helps assessors determine whether the control operated as expected and strengthens audit readiness. Risk appetite and entity data may provide context, but they do not prove that a particular control was executed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 287.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization adds stronger monitoring and approval checks to reduce the likelihood of unauthorized payments. Which treatment is being used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Mitigation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mitigation involves implementing safeguards intended to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. Stronger monitoring and approval controls can make unauthorized payments less likely or easier to detect. The business activity continues, but the organization strengthens its control environment. Avoidance would stop the activity, transfer would shift part of the consequences elsewhere, and acceptance would retain the risk without further treatment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 288.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A company purchases insurance to limit the financial impact of a possible loss. Which risk treatment is this?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Transfer<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Insurance is a common form of risk transfer because some financial consequences of a risk event are shifted to another party. The underlying event may still occur, but the organization reduces the portion of the loss it must bear directly. Mitigation reduces exposure through controls, avoidance eliminates the risky activity, and acceptance means consciously retaining the remaining risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 289.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why should risks be linked to the business entities they affect?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To show where exposure exists across the organization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To eliminate the need for risk owners<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To automatically close remediation issues<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To prevent future assessments<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. To show where exposure exists across the organization<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Business entities provide organizational context for risk. They can represent business units, applications, processes, vendors, or other scoped objects. Linking risks to these entities helps management understand where exposure exists and supports reporting, prioritization, ownership, and assessment. The relationship does not eliminate accountability or controls, but it improves enterprise-wide visibility into risk concentration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 290.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control owner must confirm periodically that a control remains active and is still being performed. Which process is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Attestation or assessment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog Request<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Change Request<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Attestation or assessment<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An attestation or assessment provides a structured mechanism for obtaining recurring confirmation that a control remains in place and continues to operate. The control owner may answer questions, certify statements, or submit supporting evidence. This helps identify control deterioration over time and supports ongoing assurance. Incident and catalog processes do not provide the same governance-focused verification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 291.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which two factors are commonly combined to evaluate risk severity?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evidence and remediation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy age and issue count<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Likelihood and impact<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control count and owner tenure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Likelihood and impact<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Likelihood represents how probable it is that a risk event will occur, while impact represents the potential consequence if it does. These factors are commonly combined in qualitative or quantitative risk-scoring methods. Organizations may define custom scales, but likelihood and impact remain common foundational dimensions. Evidence and issue counts support other governance activities but do not directly define risk severity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 292.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A risk owner concludes that the residual exposure is within tolerance and formally chooses to retain it. Which response applies?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Mitigation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoidance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Acceptance**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Acceptance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk acceptance occurs when authorized stakeholders knowingly retain the remaining exposure because it is within approved tolerance or because further treatment is not justified. The decision should generally be documented according to governance requirements. Acceptance does not eliminate the risk; it confirms that management understands the exposure and is willing to retain it under current conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 293.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>One internal control supports requirements from several compliance frameworks. What is a major benefit of this arrangement?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It can reduce duplicate testing and evidence collection<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It permanently eliminates compliance risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It prevents future assessments<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically closes related issues<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. It can reduce duplicate testing and evidence collection<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A shared control can satisfy overlapping requirements from several standards or regulations. Mapping those relationships allows the organization to reuse the same control testing and evidence across multiple obligations. This reduces duplicate work and improves traceability. If the control later fails, the organization can also identify all affected requirements more easily. Shared controls still require ongoing maintenance and assessment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 294.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Employees must confirm that they have reviewed a newly revised policy. Which process should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk transfer<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy acknowledgment or attestation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control retirement<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue closure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Policy acknowledgment or attestation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy acknowledgment or attestation creates documented evidence that designated users reviewed or accepted policy content. This supports governance, awareness, and audit readiness and can help identify individuals who have not completed the required acknowledgment. The process does not replace control testing or risk assessment, but it is appropriate for demonstrating that revised policy information was communicated to the intended population.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 295.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A control is consistently performed but still cannot sufficiently reduce the intended risk. What type of weakness exists?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evidence weakness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Operating effectiveness weakness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Design effectiveness weakness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ownership weakness<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Design effectiveness weakness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Design effectiveness evaluates whether a control is capable of achieving its intended objective. If a control is executed correctly and consistently but cannot adequately reduce the associated risk, the design itself is insufficient. The organization may need to redesign or replace the control. Operating effectiveness would instead be the concern when a properly designed control is not consistently executed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 296.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A regulation changes and the compliance team must identify which policies, controls, and risks could be affected. What is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser support information<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Password history<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> User-interface preferences<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Relationship mapping and impact analysis**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Relationship mapping and impact analysis<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Connected relationships among requirements, policies, controls, risks, and entities make regulatory change analysis much more efficient. Compliance teams can identify affected internal records without manually searching disconnected documents. This traceability helps ensure that relevant safeguards and policies are updated when obligations change. Browser and password information do not provide meaningful compliance dependency data.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 297.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A remediation issue is significantly overdue. Which information best supports accountability and escalation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assigned owner, target date, status, and corrective actions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy font style<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Browser version<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Number of knowledge articles<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Assigned owner, target date, status, and corrective actions<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Effective remediation management depends on clear ownership and deadlines. The assigned owner identifies who is responsible, the target date establishes when the work should be completed, status shows progress, and corrective actions describe what remains to be done. These details allow overdue issues to be escalated appropriately. Formatting and browser information do not contribute to remediation accountability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 298.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A shared control fails and management wants to know which external requirements could be affected. What should it review first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Application themes<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Control-to-requirement mappings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> User-login data<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge article activity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Control-to-requirement mappings<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Control-to-requirement mappings identify the regulations, standards, or internal obligations that depend on a particular safeguard. When a shared control fails, these relationships allow management to assess the broader compliance impact quickly. This supports remediation prioritization, reporting, and impact analysis. Application themes and user-login data do not provide the required compliance dependency information.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 299.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A critical control fails and the organization believes the current residual risk score may no longer be accurate. What should happen next?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore the control failure<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Record the deficiency, track remediation, and reassess the risk as appropriate<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove the related regulation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Record the deficiency, track remediation, and reassess the risk as appropriate<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A failed critical control can reduce the amount of mitigation the organization previously assumed was in place. Residual exposure may therefore be higher than the current score indicates. The organization should document the deficiency, track corrective action, and reassess the related risk where appropriate. Ignoring or deleting the records would hide the problem rather than manage it responsibly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 300.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice best supports enterprise-scale ServiceNow Risk and Compliance operations?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Track findings mainly through email<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep risks and controls in unrelated files<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid maintaining requirement mappings<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain accurate connected records for entities, risks, controls, policies, requirements, assessments, evidence, issues, and remediation**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Maintain accurate connected records for entities, risks, controls, policies, requirements, assessments, evidence, issues, and remediation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Enterprise-scale Risk and Compliance depends on reliable, structured, and connected data. Entities provide business context, risks represent exposure, controls provide mitigation, policies and requirements define obligations, assessments and evidence support assurance, and issues manage remediation. Maintaining these relationships improves reporting, accountability, audit readiness, and impact analysis. Disconnected files and informal email tracking become increasingly difficult to govern as organizational and regulatory complexity grows.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ServiceNow CIS-RC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 281. An organization wants to know which controls contribute to reducing a particular enterprise risk. Which relationship is most important? Risk-to-control relationship 2. Policy-to-browser relationship 3. Issue-to-theme relationship 4. Knowledge-to-catalog relationship Correct Answer: 1. Risk-to-control relationship Explanation: The relationship between a risk and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18884"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18884"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18884\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18885,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18884\/revisions\/18885"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}