{"id":18993,"date":"2026-09-22T11:09:24","date_gmt":"2026-09-22T11:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=18993"},"modified":"2026-09-22T11:09:24","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T11:09:24","slug":"servicenow-cis-sm-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part9-q161-180","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/servicenow-cis-sm-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part9-q161-180\/","title":{"rendered":"ServiceNow CIS-SM Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part9 Q161-180"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/cis-sm-exam-dumps\"><b>ServiceNow CIS-SM Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 161.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A Service Mapping administrator sees that a mapped application server has no dependency on the database, even though the application configuration contains a valid connection string. What should be reviewed first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The pattern logic that reads and interprets the connection string<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident priority rules<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Catalog categories<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge article ownership<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. The pattern logic that reads and interprets the connection string<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the application configuration clearly contains the database connection details, the discovery pattern should be able to use that information to identify the dependency. The administrator should review whether the pattern reads the correct file, parses the connection string properly, resolves the target, and creates the expected relationship. This is more relevant than unrelated incident, catalog, or knowledge settings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 162.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A MID Server can resolve a hostname but cannot reach the target on the required port. What is the most likely area to investigate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge permissions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Network routing, firewall rules, and port access<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Application ownership<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog fulfillment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Network routing, firewall rules, and port access<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Successful hostname resolution only confirms that DNS is working. Service Mapping still requires the MID Server to establish communication with the target using the appropriate protocol and port. Firewalls, routing restrictions, or disabled services can prevent this connection. Administrators should verify network reachability before troubleshooting credentials or application-specific discovery logic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 163.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A pattern discovers the correct server but creates the wrong application CI. Which part of the discovery process most likely needs adjustment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident routing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Catalog workflow<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Application identification logic<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge feedback<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Application identification logic<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the server itself is discovered correctly but the wrong application CI is created, the issue is usually related to how the pattern identifies the application technology. The administrator should review process names, command-line arguments, ports, configuration files, and other attributes used in the identification logic. Correct application identification is necessary for accurate CI classification and dependency mapping.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 164.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A service map contains too many unrelated network connections, making the topology difficult to interpret. What should be done?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Add even more network connections<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the application service<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable the CMDB<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Refine the discovery logic to follow only service-relevant dependencies**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Refine the discovery logic to follow only service-relevant dependencies<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Service Mapping should present meaningful dependencies that support the application service, not every connection visible on a server. Overly broad discovery can create noise and reduce the usefulness of the map. Refining the pattern or connection logic helps ensure that the topology reflects only the components that participate in service delivery.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 165.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why is it important to keep CI lifecycle data accurate in a Service Mapping environment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It helps distinguish current service components from retired or obsolete infrastructure<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically fixes all pattern errors<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It removes the need for credentials<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It prevents every outage<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. It helps distinguish current service components from retired or obsolete infrastructure<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Service maps should reflect the infrastructure currently supporting the service. If lifecycle information is inaccurate, retired components may remain visible and create misleading impact paths. Accurate lifecycle data, combined with recurring discovery, helps ensure that active topology remains current while historical information can still be preserved appropriately for governance and audit purposes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 166.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A scheduled mapping job fails after a security team closes a port that discovery uses. What should the administrator verify?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge article categories<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether the required discovery protocol and port are still permitted<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident closure codes<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Catalog prices<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Whether the required discovery protocol and port are still permitted<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Discovery patterns depend on specific protocols and ports to communicate with target systems. If a security change blocks one of those paths, the MID Server may no longer be able to authenticate or retrieve information. The administrator should verify current firewall rules and coordinate with the network or security team to restore appropriate access while maintaining required security controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 167.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the main benefit of testing a modified discovery pattern on a small set of representative systems first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It guarantees no future changes will occur<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates CMDB governance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It helps detect incorrect CI or relationship creation before broad deployment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It removes the need for discovery logs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. It helps detect incorrect CI or relationship creation before broad deployment<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A pattern modification can affect many targets, so controlled testing reduces the risk of widespread CMDB problems. Representative testing helps verify identification, attribute collection, and relationship behavior across realistic environments. If errors are found, they can be corrected before the pattern is used at scale. This protects both Service Mapping accuracy and CMDB data quality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 168.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An application service spans two cloud regions and one on-premises data center. What should Service Mapping planning include?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only the primary cloud region<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only the data center<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Manual entry of all cloud resources<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Discovery coverage and connectivity for all relevant environments**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Discovery coverage and connectivity for all relevant environments<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A complete service map must represent all relevant supporting components, regardless of where they are hosted. Planning should account for MID Server placement, APIs, network routes, security boundaries, credentials, and supported discovery methods across each region and the on-premises environment. Missing coverage in any location can result in an incomplete topology.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 169.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A shared web proxy supports several application services. Why should it be mapped to each service that depends on it?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To show potential multi-service impact if the proxy fails<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To guarantee the proxy never fails<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To replace network monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To create more incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. To show potential multi-service impact if the proxy fails<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Shared infrastructure can affect several services at once. Mapping the web proxy to each dependent application service gives operations teams visibility into the broader impact of an outage, degradation, or planned change. This is useful for incident response and change planning. Service Mapping provides dependency awareness, not availability guarantees.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 170.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A discovered server is repeatedly created as a duplicate CI even though the original CI already exists. What should be reviewed?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Catalog fulfillment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Identification attributes and reconciliation behavior<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge article permissions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident response templates<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Identification attributes and reconciliation behavior<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Repeated duplication means the discovered data is not matching the existing CI according to the identification criteria. Administrators should inspect the attributes being used for identification, their consistency, and reconciliation behavior. Resolving this issue at the source prevents further duplicate creation and improves the accuracy of service maps and impact analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 171.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A dependency exists between two CIs, but the relationship direction is reversed. Why should this be corrected?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It changes user permissions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It affects Service Catalog visibility<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incorrect direction can distort dependency and impact analysis<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It prevents all discovery jobs from running<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Incorrect direction can distort dependency and impact analysis<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Relationship direction communicates how one CI depends on or supports another. If direction is incorrect, teams may misunderstand which component is upstream or downstream and how an outage or change may propagate. The discovery logic responsible for creating the relationship should be corrected so future discovery produces the right topology automatically.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 172.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why is recurring discovery important for containerized or cloud-native environments?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> These environments never change<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Containers cannot be represented as CIs<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Recurring discovery is only for legacy infrastructure<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Components can appear, disappear, or move frequently**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Components can appear, disappear, or move frequently<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cloud-native and containerized environments can be highly dynamic. Resources may scale automatically, be replaced frequently, or move between hosts and regions. Recurring discovery helps Service Mapping keep pace with these changes so topology remains useful. A static map can become outdated quickly in environments with rapid infrastructure turnover.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 173.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why should application owners participate in validating discovered topology?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They can compare the map with known application architecture and identify missing or incorrect dependencies<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They replace the MID Server<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They eliminate the need for patterns<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They automatically fix duplicate CIs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. They can compare the map with known application architecture and identify missing or incorrect dependencies<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application owners and technical experts understand how the service is expected to function. Their knowledge can help validate whether Service Mapping discovered the right components and relationships. Differences between the expected and discovered architecture may reveal missing credentials, unsupported technologies, stale documentation, or incorrect pattern logic. This review improves confidence in the final map.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 174.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A pattern command works on one operating-system release but not another. What is the most appropriate response?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove the newer operating system from scope<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Update the pattern to account for supported platform differences<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the service map<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable credential use<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Update the pattern to account for supported platform differences<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Different operating-system releases may use different commands, file paths, output formats, or system utilities. Pattern logic may need conditional handling or alternative steps to support these variations. The administrator should test changes carefully against representative systems. Removing valid infrastructure from scope would hide the problem rather than solve it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 175.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice best helps prevent stale service maps after frequent server migrations?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable all discovery schedules<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep old relationships indefinitely<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use recurring discovery and monitor CI and relationship freshness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Manually recreate every map after each change<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Use recurring discovery and monitor CI and relationship freshness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Frequent migrations can quickly make service topology outdated. Recurring discovery helps identify new components and changed dependencies, while freshness monitoring helps reveal stale records that are no longer relevant. This is more scalable and reliable than maintaining maps entirely by hand. Accurate topology supports stronger incident and change impact analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 176.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which condition most clearly indicates a connectivity problem rather than an authentication problem?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The password is rejected by the target<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The account can connect but cannot run a required command<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The account has insufficient privileges<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The MID Server cannot establish a session to the target port**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. The MID Server cannot establish a session to the target port<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the MID Server cannot establish a session at all, the problem is most likely related to routing, firewalls, port availability, or the target service itself. Authentication and permission issues usually occur after a network connection has already been established. Distinguishing connectivity from credential failures helps reduce troubleshooting time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 177.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why should duplicate CI trends be monitored in a large Service Mapping implementation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Duplicate CIs can create misleading topology and impact paths<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Duplicate CIs improve mapping accuracy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Duplicate CIs eliminate the need for reconciliation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Duplicate CIs improve credential security<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Duplicate CIs can create misleading topology and impact paths<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When the same real-world component appears as multiple CIs, relationships may be divided or duplicated across those records. This can make service maps confusing and weaken impact analysis. Monitoring duplicate trends helps identify systemic identification or source-data problems before they affect a large portion of the CMDB.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 178.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A discovery job succeeds when launched manually but fails when run on schedule. Which comparison is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Knowledge article versions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> MID Server selection, credentials, timing, and execution context<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Catalog item approvals<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Incident categorization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. MID Server selection, credentials, timing, and execution context<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Manual and scheduled executions may use different MID Servers, credentials, network conditions, or timing. Comparing these details and reviewing the associated logs can help identify why scheduled discovery behaves differently. The pattern itself may be correct, while environmental or selection differences cause the scheduled run to fail.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 179.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why is a topology map more useful than a simple list of servers for application support?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically fixes failed servers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It removes the need for monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It shows the dependency relationships among components supporting the service<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It prevents configuration changes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. It shows the dependency relationships among components supporting the service<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A list identifies which components exist, but topology explains how they work together. Service Mapping shows relationships among web, application, middleware, database, and other infrastructure layers. This provides valuable context for troubleshooting, change planning, and impact analysis because teams can see how a problem in one component may affect the rest of the service.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 180.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice best supports sustainable Service Mapping quality in a large enterprise?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rely on one-time discovery only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain all relationships manually<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore discovery warnings until an outage occurs<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Continuously monitor discovery health, CMDB quality, credentials, pattern behavior, and topology freshness**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Continuously monitor discovery health, CMDB quality, credentials, pattern behavior, and topology freshness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Service Mapping quality can degrade as infrastructure changes, credentials expire, network rules change, and patterns encounter new configurations. Continuous monitoring helps administrators identify these issues before maps become unreliable. Healthy CMDB data, secure access, tested patterns, recurring discovery, and regular validation are all necessary for maintaining trustworthy application service topology at enterprise scale.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ServiceNow CIS-SM Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 161. A Service Mapping administrator sees that a mapped application server has no dependency on the database, even though the application configuration contains a valid connection string. What should be reviewed first? The pattern logic that reads and interprets the connection string 2. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18993"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18993"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18994,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18993\/revisions\/18994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}