{"id":19318,"date":"2026-09-23T04:52:35","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T04:52:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=19318"},"modified":"2026-09-23T04:52:35","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T04:52:35","slug":"isc-csslp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isc-csslp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160\/","title":{"rendered":"ISC CSSLP Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part8 Q141-160"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/csslp-exam-dumps\"><b>ISC CSSLP Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 141.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A software team is designing a sensitive business workflow that requires two independent approvals. Which security principle is being applied?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Separation of duties<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Open design<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data minimization<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Fail open<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Separation of duties<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Separation of duties reduces the risk that one individual can complete an entire sensitive process without oversight. Requiring independent approvals can help prevent fraud, misuse, and accidental errors. The application should also maintain individual identities and protected audit records so each approval can be attributed to a specific person. This control is especially valuable for high-value transactions, administrative changes, and security-sensitive configuration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 142.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which implementation BEST reduces the risk of insecure deserialization?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Deserialize arbitrary untrusted objects with full privileges<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid unsafe native object deserialization and accept only strictly validated expected data structures<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable input validation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store serialized objects in publicly writable locations<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Avoid unsafe native object deserialization and accept only strictly validated expected data structures<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unsafe deserialization can allow attackers to manipulate object data, invoke unexpected code paths, or exploit dangerous classes. Applications should prefer simple structured formats and validate expected types and fields explicitly rather than recreating arbitrary objects from untrusted input. Integrity protection, allowlists, and least privilege can provide additional defense. Deserialization libraries and frameworks should also remain patched and supported.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 143.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security architect wants to understand what could happen if an attacker compromises a public-facing service. Which activity is MOST useful?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> UI usability testing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Database performance tuning<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Attack-path analysis across trust boundaries and dependencies<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Marketing review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Attack-path analysis across trust boundaries and dependencies<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attack-path analysis examines how compromise of one component could allow movement toward more sensitive systems, data, or privileges. It helps identify weak boundaries, excessive permissions, shared credentials, and overly broad communication paths. This information supports segmentation, least privilege, authentication, and monitoring decisions. Understanding likely post-compromise movement is an important part of secure architecture and threat modeling.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 144.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An application encounters a failure while validating the integrity of a security-sensitive configuration file. What is the safest behavior?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Load the configuration anyway<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore the integrity failure<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace the file with user-supplied configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reject the configuration and enter a controlled secure state<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Reject the configuration and enter a controlled secure state<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the integrity of a security-sensitive configuration cannot be verified, using it could allow unauthorized or malicious settings to take effect. The application should reject the untrusted configuration and fail in a predictable secure manner. Operators should receive appropriate alerts and diagnostic information without exposing sensitive details. Security controls should not silently continue using data whose integrity is uncertain.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 145.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the PRIMARY purpose of secure defaults in software design?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ensure that initial or fallback configurations provide reasonable protection without requiring users to harden them first<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Eliminate the need for administrator configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Make all features publicly accessible<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authentication until setup is complete<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Ensure that initial or fallback configurations provide reasonable protection without requiring users to harden them first<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secure defaults reduce risk when users or administrators do not modify initial settings. Examples include disabling unnecessary services, requiring authentication, limiting permissions, and refusing insecure protocols. Administrators may later adjust settings based on legitimate requirements, but the initial state should not create avoidable exposure. Secure defaults help prevent common configuration errors and support fail-safe design.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 146.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A software application uses OAuth to obtain permission to access a user&#8217;s external resources. What is OAuth primarily designed to provide?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data encryption<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delegated authorization<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Password hashing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Malware detection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Delegated authorization<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">OAuth is primarily an authorization framework that allows a client to obtain limited access to resources without requiring the user to share primary credentials with that client. It uses tokens representing granted permissions or scopes. Authentication can be layered on through technologies such as OpenID Connect. Developers should not assume that possession of an OAuth access token alone provides all identity information required by an application.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 147.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A development team wants to ensure that sensitive functionality cannot be invoked by simply bypassing the user interface. What control is MOST important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Hiding administrative menu items<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Using complex URLs<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Enforcing authorization on the server for every protected operation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Renaming privileged endpoints<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Enforcing authorization on the server for every protected operation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Attackers can issue requests directly without using the intended interface. Hiding a button or using obscure URLs does not provide reliable access control. The trusted server must validate the user&#8217;s identity and authorization before performing every protected action. Client-side controls may improve usability, but they should never be treated as the security boundary for sensitive operations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 148.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A software company wants to ensure that security patches distributed to customers have not been modified. Which control is BEST?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Compress the patch files<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rename the patch before release<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Publish a larger installation package<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Digitally sign the patch and protect the signing key<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Digitally sign the patch and protect the signing key<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Digital signatures allow customers and update systems to verify both the origin and integrity of a software patch. The private signing key therefore becomes a highly sensitive asset and must be strongly protected. Access to signing operations should be tightly controlled and audited, with revocation procedures available if the key is compromised. Signing does not replace security testing of the patch itself.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 149.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice BEST reduces the impact of a compromised application service account?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assign only the minimum privileges required by that service<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Give the account administrator rights to simplify support<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reuse the same account across all applications<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable account monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Assign only the minimum privileges required by that service<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Least privilege reduces the damage an attacker can cause with a compromised service credential. Each application should use a distinct identity and receive only the permissions required for its legitimate operations. Separate identities also improve accountability and make credentials easier to rotate or revoke independently. Broad shared accounts create a much larger blast radius and should be avoided when practical.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 150.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A team wants to prevent replay of signed API requests. Which control is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use a longer URL<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Include a nonce, timestamp, or equivalent freshness mechanism in the authenticated request<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable signatures<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Accept identical requests indefinitely<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Include a nonce, timestamp, or equivalent freshness mechanism in the authenticated request<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A valid signature proves that a request was created by someone possessing the appropriate key, but without a freshness mechanism an attacker may capture and resend the same signed request. Nonces, timestamps, sequence values, or one-time identifiers can help the server detect replayed messages. These values must themselves be covered by the integrity or signature mechanism so attackers cannot alter them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 151.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security review finds that a mobile application stores access tokens in an unprotected local file. What is the MAIN concern?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Token files may use too much disk space<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The application may start more slowly<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Malware or another user may obtain the tokens and impersonate the account<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Token lengths may increase<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Malware or another user may obtain the tokens and impersonate the account<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Access tokens often function as bearer credentials, meaning possession may be sufficient to access protected resources. They should therefore be stored using platform-provided protected storage mechanisms when available, with scopes and lifetimes limited appropriately. Sensitive tokens should not be placed in broadly readable files, logs, or backups. Compromise of a token may allow attackers to impersonate the user until it expires or is revoked.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 152.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A new software release depends on a critical third-party cloud API. What should the release team verify before production deployment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only that the API works during one test<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only that the provider has a public website<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only that the development team likes the API<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Authentication, failure behavior, security requirements, monitoring, and dependency risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Authentication, failure behavior, security requirements, monitoring, and dependency risk<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Third-party APIs introduce both trust and availability dependencies. The application should authenticate the provider appropriately, validate responses, protect data in transit, enforce timeouts, and define safe behavior during failures. Monitoring should detect degraded service or unexpected responses. Business continuity and provider security should also be considered because external services may fail independently of the application.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 153.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice BEST helps prevent accidental disclosure of secrets through source-control history?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep secrets outside repositories and use automated secret scanning<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rename passwords before committing them<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store secrets in code comments<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Depend on repository privacy alone<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Keep secrets outside repositories and use automated secret scanning<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Once a secret is committed, deleting it from the latest version may not remove it from repository history. Applications should obtain credentials from approved external secret-management mechanisms. Automated scanners can detect likely secrets before or after commits. If a credential is exposed, it should be rotated or revoked promptly rather than assumed safe because the file was later deleted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 154.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A development team wants to protect users from malicious content uploaded as images. Which approach is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Trust the file extension<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Validate and safely process the content using restricted privileges and appropriate file-handling controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Execute every upload as part of validation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store uploads in the application executable directory<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Validate and safely process the content using restricted privileges and appropriate file-handling controls<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Files that appear to be images can contain malformed data, embedded content, or unexpected formats designed to exploit processing libraries. Applications should validate actual content, restrict acceptable formats and size, use safe storage, and process uploads with minimal privileges. Re-encoding or scanning may provide additional protection depending on the risk. File extensions alone cannot establish that uploaded content is safe.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 155.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A software team wants to reduce the chance that cryptographic algorithms become obsolete during a product&#8217;s long support life. Which design principle is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Permanently hard-code one algorithm everywhere<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Create a proprietary encryption algorithm<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Design for cryptographic agility using approved abstractions and manageable key lifecycles<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid encryption entirely<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Design for cryptographic agility using approved abstractions and manageable key lifecycles<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cryptographic agility allows software to transition to different approved algorithms, key sizes, or protocols when existing choices become obsolete or unsuitable. This is particularly important for long-lived products and archived data. The architecture should avoid unnecessary assumptions that make algorithms difficult to replace. Cryptographic changes still require careful testing, interoperability planning, and secure key migration.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 156.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A secure application permits users to upload compressed archives. What security concern should be addressed MOST carefully?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The archive filename may be too short<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Compressed files always contain malware<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Archive processing should use administrator privileges<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Resource exhaustion and path manipulation during extraction<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Resource exhaustion and path manipulation during extraction<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Compressed archives can expand to extremely large sizes or contain crafted paths that overwrite files outside the intended extraction directory. Applications should impose resource limits, validate extracted paths, restrict supported formats, and process archives in isolated environments with minimal permissions. These controls help reduce risks such as decompression bombs and archive-based path traversal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 157.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the MAIN purpose of performing security regression tests after fixing a vulnerability?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Verify that the vulnerability remains fixed after future software changes<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace all functional tests<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove the vulnerability from documentation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Eliminate the need for code review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Verify that the vulnerability remains fixed after future software changes<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A vulnerability fix should often be accompanied by a test that reproduces the original condition and confirms the corrected behavior. Adding that test to the regression suite helps detect if future changes accidentally reintroduce the same weakness. Regression testing is particularly useful for recurring authorization, validation, session, and logic flaws. It complements other testing and review techniques.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 158.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A software organization wants developers to receive security feedback as early as possible. Which approach is BEST?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Wait for annual penetration testing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Integrate appropriate security checks into developer workflows and CI\/CD pipelines<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Perform testing only after production deployment<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid automated security testing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Integrate appropriate security checks into developer workflows and CI\/CD pipelines<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Early feedback allows security defects to be corrected while developers still understand the relevant code and before vulnerabilities reach later lifecycle stages. Static analysis, dependency checks, secret scanning, unit tests, and selected security tests can be integrated into development workflows. Automated checks do not replace threat modeling, manual review, or penetration testing, but they help make security continuous and repeatable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 159.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A vulnerability exists only in an old product version that is still officially supported. What should the organization do?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore it because a newer version exists<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove the old version from documentation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assess and remediate or mitigate the supported version according to vulnerability-management policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Wait until customers report exploitation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Assess and remediate or mitigate the supported version according to vulnerability-management policy<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If a version remains supported, the organization generally retains responsibility for addressing security issues according to its support and vulnerability-management commitments. The vulnerability should be assessed for severity and exposure, and an appropriate patch, mitigation, upgrade path, or risk decision should be provided. Support policies should clearly define customer expectations and end-of-support timelines.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 160.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which practice BEST represents mature CSSLP-focused software security management?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Treat security testing as a one-time release activity<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rely entirely on individual developer judgment<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Stop reviewing software after deployment<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Continuously manage security requirements, design, implementation, verification, deployment, maintenance, and retirement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Continuously manage security requirements, design, implementation, verification, deployment, maintenance, and retirement<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mature software security spans the full development and operational lifecycle. Requirements define protection goals, secure architecture addresses systemic risk, coding practices reduce implementation weaknesses, testing provides assurance, and controlled deployment protects release integrity. Maintenance continues to address vulnerabilities and dependencies until the product is formally retired. Governance, training, metrics, and continuous improvement support these activities across the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ISC CSSLP Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 141. A software team is designing a sensitive business workflow that requires two independent approvals. Which security principle is being applied? Separation of duties Open design Data minimization Fail open Correct Answer: 1. Separation of duties Explanation: Separation of duties reduces the risk [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19318"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19318"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19319,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19318\/revisions\/19319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}