{"id":19756,"date":"2026-09-23T07:29:11","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T07:29:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=19756"},"modified":"2026-09-23T07:29:11","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T07:29:11","slug":"cyberark-epm-def-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part1-q1-20","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cyberark-epm-def-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part1-q1-20\/","title":{"rendered":"CyberArk EPM-DEF Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part1 Q1-20"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>CyberArk EPM-DEF Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 1.<\/b><\/p>\n

An organization deploys CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to reduce the number of users who have permanent local administrator rights. Which security principle is the organization MOST directly implementing?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Least privilege<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> Data replication<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> High availability<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> Network segmentation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. Least privilege<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    Least privilege means users and applications receive only the permissions required to perform legitimate tasks. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can help organizations remove permanent local administrator rights while still allowing approved applications or tasks to run with elevated privileges when necessary. This reduces the attack surface because users do not retain broad administrative access for routine work. If malware executes under a standard user account, it also has fewer opportunities to make privileged system changes. Least privilege should be supported by well-designed policies, application controls, monitoring, and periodic review. High availability and replication address service resilience, while network segmentation restricts network communication and does not directly replace excessive endpoint privileges.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 2.<\/b><\/p>\n

    A user needs to install an approved application, but the user does not have local administrator rights. Which CyberArk EPM capability is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Permanently add the user to the local Administrators group<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> Elevate the approved application according to policy<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> Disable endpoint protection<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> Give the user the administrator password<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2. Elevate the approved application according to policy<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      CyberArk EPM is designed to support controlled privilege elevation without requiring users to maintain permanent administrator rights. A policy can identify an approved installer or application and allow it to run with elevated privileges while the user remains a standard user. This approach supports least privilege because elevation is limited to the specific application or task that requires it. Permanently adding the user to the Administrators group gives much broader rights than necessary and increases security risk. Sharing administrator passwords weakens accountability and credential security. Disabling endpoint protection would further increase risk. Policy-based application elevation provides a more controlled and auditable way to support business requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 3.<\/b><\/p>\n

      Which CyberArk EPM function is MOST useful for preventing an unapproved executable from running on managed endpoints?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Database backup<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> Network routing<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> Application control<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> Password synchronization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Application control<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        Application control allows administrators to define which applications are trusted, blocked, restricted, or otherwise managed on endpoints. This is useful for preventing unauthorized or potentially dangerous software from executing. Policies can be based on application characteristics and organizational requirements, allowing approved business applications while restricting unknown or prohibited software. Effective application control can reduce malware risk, shadow IT, and misuse of administrative tools. It should be implemented carefully because overly broad blocking policies can disrupt legitimate work. Administrators should monitor events, test changes, and create exceptions when justified. Database backup, routing, and password synchronization address different operational needs and do not directly determine whether an executable is permitted to run.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 4.<\/b><\/p>\n

        An administrator wants to understand which applications users are attempting to run with elevated privileges before enforcing strict policies. Which approach is BEST?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Immediately block every application<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> Remove the EPM agent<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> Disable event collection<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> Monitor application activity and review collected events before enforcing restrictive policies**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Monitor application activity and review collected events before enforcing restrictive policies<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          A monitoring or discovery-oriented approach helps administrators understand real endpoint behavior before introducing restrictive privilege or application-control policies. Collected events can reveal which applications request elevation, which users run them, how frequently they are used, and whether the activity is legitimate. This information supports better policy design and reduces the risk of disrupting essential business applications. Moving directly to broad blocking without understanding the environment can create support incidents and reduce user productivity. Disabling event collection removes valuable evidence, while removing the agent eliminates the control entirely. A phased deployment that observes, analyzes, tests, and then enforces policies generally provides better security and operational outcomes.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 5.<\/b><\/p>\n

          A company wants approved software to run with elevated privileges while unknown software remains restricted. What should the EPM administrator create?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Application-based privilege policies<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> A shared local administrator account<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> A policy granting all users administrative rights<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> An unrestricted endpoint configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. Application-based privilege policies<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            Application-based privilege policies allow administrators to associate elevation behavior with specific trusted software rather than granting broad administrative access to users. Approved applications can receive the privileges they require, while unknown or unauthorized applications remain subject to standard-user restrictions or other configured controls. This approach reduces privilege exposure and improves accountability because the administrator can define exactly which applications are allowed to elevate. Policies should use reliable application-identification criteria and should be tested before broad deployment. Shared administrative accounts and unrestricted endpoint configurations weaken security because they expand access beyond the specific task requirement. Application-focused privilege management is a central method for implementing least privilege without unnecessarily blocking legitimate business activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 6.<\/b><\/p>\n

            Which endpoint condition creates the GREATEST risk that CyberArk EPM privilege-management policies are intended to reduce?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Users have different desktop wallpapers<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> Users operate permanently with local administrator privileges<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> Users have different monitor sizes<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> Users connect to different printers<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2. Users operate permanently with local administrator privileges<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              Permanent local administrator rights significantly increase endpoint risk because users and any code running in their context can make system-level changes. Malware may install services, modify security settings, alter protected files, or establish persistence more easily when administrative privileges are available. CyberArk EPM helps reduce this exposure by allowing organizations to remove standing administrative rights and elevate only approved applications or tasks when required. Users can continue working without receiving unrestricted control over the endpoint. Effective privilege management also improves auditability because elevation decisions can be tied to policies and events. Differences in wallpaper, display hardware, or printers are normal endpoint variations and do not create the same privilege-related attack surface.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 7.<\/b><\/p>\n

              An administrator is troubleshooting why an approved application is not receiving the expected elevation on a managed endpoint. What should be checked FIRST?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> The user’s browser history<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> The endpoint wallpaper settings<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Whether the application matches the intended EPM policy and whether the policy is applied to the endpoint<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> The office printer queue<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Whether the application matches the intended EPM policy and whether the policy is applied to the endpoint<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                Privilege elevation depends on the application matching the configured policy and the relevant policy being assigned and available on the endpoint. The administrator should first confirm that the application-identification criteria are correct, that the endpoint belongs to the expected policy scope, and that the endpoint has received the current policy. Event information can then help determine whether another policy, mismatch, or configuration issue affected the result. Troubleshooting should begin with the most directly related policy and application conditions before investigating unrelated endpoint settings. Browser history, wallpaper configuration, and printer queues do not normally affect whether CyberArk EPM recognizes and elevates an application.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 8.<\/b><\/p>\n

                A user attempts to run an unauthorized administrative utility that is explicitly prohibited by organizational policy. Which EPM response is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Automatically grant administrator rights to the user<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> Ignore the event<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> Disable endpoint logging<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> Block the application according to policy and record the event**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Block the application according to policy and record the event<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  When an application is explicitly prohibited, an EPM policy can prevent it from executing and record the event for administrative review. Logging the event is important because it provides visibility into attempted use, supports investigation, and helps identify repeated or widespread policy violations. The administrator can determine whether the attempt was malicious, accidental, or caused by a legitimate business need that requires review. Automatically granting broader privileges would contradict the policy and weaken least privilege. Ignoring the event would reduce visibility, while disabling logging would make troubleshooting and security monitoring more difficult. Enforcement combined with auditing provides both preventive and detective protection.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 9.<\/b><\/p>\n

                  What is a PRIMARY benefit of using CyberArk EPM instead of giving users the credentials of a privileged local account?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Elevation can be controlled by policy without revealing privileged credentials to users<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> Every application automatically becomes trusted<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> Users can disable security policies<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> Endpoint monitoring is no longer necessary<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Elevation can be controlled by policy without revealing privileged credentials to users<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Policy-based elevation allows users to complete approved privileged tasks without learning or handling local administrator credentials. This reduces credential exposure and prevents users from reusing privileged passwords for unrelated actions. It also improves accountability because elevation is controlled through defined policy rather than informal password sharing. The organization can decide which applications or operations should receive additional privileges and can monitor related events. EPM does not automatically trust every application, and security monitoring remains important even when elevation is controlled. Users should not be able to disable policies simply because they need occasional privileged functionality. Separating privilege from credential disclosure provides stronger security and more precise control.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 10.<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A company is introducing EPM to thousands of endpoints. Which deployment practice BEST reduces the chance of business disruption?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> Apply the most restrictive policy to every endpoint immediately<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> Pilot policies with a representative group, review events, and expand deployment gradually<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> Disable all applications during deployment<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> Remove all existing endpoint management tools without testing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Pilot policies with a representative group, review events, and expand deployment gradually<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A staged deployment reduces risk by allowing administrators to observe how EPM policies affect real users and applications before broad enforcement. A representative pilot group can expose unexpected application dependencies, elevation requirements, policy conflicts, and support issues. Administrators can then refine policy logic and create justified exceptions before expanding to additional endpoints. Monitoring event data during the pilot also provides evidence about which applications actually require elevation. Deploying highly restrictive policies to every device immediately can disrupt business-critical software and create a large volume of support incidents. A gradual rollout with testing, monitoring, and documented success criteria supports both security and operational stability.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 11.<\/b><\/p>\n

                      A security team wants EPM policies to apply only to a particular set of managed endpoints rather than the entire organization. Which concept is MOST important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> Policy targeting and scope<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> Database normalization<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> Network address translation<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> File compression<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. Policy targeting and scope<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Policy targeting determines which endpoints, users, groups, or other managed objects receive a specific EPM configuration. Proper scope is important because different departments, device types, application sets, or risk levels may require different privilege-management behavior. For example, developers may need controlled access to tools that ordinary office users never require. Administrators should ensure that policies are applied to the intended population and should understand how overlapping assignments or policy precedence are handled. Poor targeting can either weaken security by leaving endpoints uncontrolled or disrupt business by applying inappropriate restrictions. Normalization, NAT, and compression are unrelated to assigning endpoint privilege-management policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 12.<\/b><\/p>\n

                        An EPM administrator wants to know whether users are repeatedly requesting elevation for the same unrecognized application. Which data source is MOST useful?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Printer logs<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> DHCP lease history only<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> Endpoint application and privilege events collected by EPM<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> Office access-card records<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3. Endpoint application and privilege events collected by EPM<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          EPM event data provides visibility into application execution and privilege-related activity on managed endpoints. Administrators can use these events to identify applications that frequently trigger elevation requests, determine which users or computers are involved, and decide whether the software should be approved, blocked, or investigated. Repeated events may indicate a legitimate business application that needs a formal policy or potentially unauthorized software being used across multiple systems. Event analysis is therefore important for both policy tuning and security investigation. Printer logs, building-access records, and unrelated network information may provide context in other investigations but do not directly show EPM application elevation behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 13.<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A trusted application is upgraded to a new version and no longer matches an existing EPM rule. What is the BEST administrative response?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> Review the updated application’s identifying attributes and safely update the policy if the new version is approved<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> Grant permanent administrator rights to every affected user<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> Disable EPM globally<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> Trust every application from the same download folder<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. Review the updated application’s identifying attributes and safely update the policy if the new version is approved<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Application updates can change file hashes, versions, signatures, paths, or other identifying properties used by endpoint policies. If an approved application stops matching a policy after an upgrade, the administrator should verify that the new version is legitimate and then update the application definition or policy criteria using a secure identification method. Broadly trusting an entire folder could allow malicious or unauthorized files placed in that location to inherit elevated privileges. Granting permanent administrator rights would undermine the least-privilege objective, while disabling EPM would remove protection from all endpoints. Controlled policy maintenance ensures approved software continues to work without expanding trust unnecessarily.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 14.<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Why is a digital publisher or signature useful when identifying trusted applications in an EPM policy?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> It guarantees the application is vulnerability-free<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> It can provide a stronger identity attribute than relying only on a filename<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> It removes the need for all policy testing<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> It gives the user permanent administrator rights<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2. It can provide a stronger identity attribute than relying only on a filename<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A filename alone is a weak trust indicator because an attacker may create a malicious executable using the same name as a legitimate application. Publisher or digital-signature information can provide stronger evidence about who signed the software and can be combined with other application properties such as product name, path, version, or hash. No single attribute should automatically be considered perfect for every situation, and administrators should select matching criteria that balance security and manageability. A valid signature does not prove that software is free from vulnerabilities or appropriate for the organization. It also does not eliminate the need for testing or grant users standing administrator privileges.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 15.<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A security administrator creates a policy that elevates every executable launched from a writable user download directory. What is the MAIN security concern?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Users or malware could place untrusted executables in the directory and receive unintended elevation<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> The endpoint will no longer have an operating system<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> All network traffic will be encrypted twice<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> Backups will stop functioning<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1. Users or malware could place untrusted executables in the directory and receive unintended elevation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Trusting every executable based only on its presence in a user-writable directory creates a dangerous elevation path. A malicious user or malware could place an arbitrary program into the trusted location and receive elevated privileges when it runs. Application policies should therefore use sufficiently strong identification criteria and avoid broad trust rules based on locations that ordinary users can modify freely. Digital signatures, controlled publishers, hashes, product attributes, or combinations of criteria may provide stronger identification depending on the use case. Policy design should assume that attackers will attempt to exploit overly broad matching rules. The issue is unintended privilege escalation, not operating-system removal, backup failure, or duplicate encryption.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 16.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                An employee needs temporary elevation for a one-time troubleshooting task that is not covered by an existing standard policy. Which approach BEST preserves least privilege?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Permanently add the employee to the local Administrators group<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> Share another administrator’s password<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> Disable all endpoint controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> Use an approved, controlled temporary elevation process and remove the elevated capability when the task is complete**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 4. Use an approved, controlled temporary elevation process and remove the elevated capability when the task is complete<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  One-time troubleshooting should not require permanent administrative access. A controlled temporary elevation process allows the organization to grant the necessary privilege for a limited purpose and duration while maintaining accountability. The request can be approved, monitored, and revoked when the task ends. This limits the period in which elevated capability is available and reduces standing privilege. Permanently adding the user to the Administrators group creates continuing risk long after the task is complete. Sharing credentials weakens accountability and exposes privileged secrets. Disabling endpoint controls removes protection from unrelated activities. Time-bounded, approved elevation is more consistent with least privilege and good privileged-access governance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 17.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Which action should an EPM administrator take when a newly enforced policy unexpectedly blocks a critical business application for many users?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Review the relevant EPM events, confirm the policy match, and implement a controlled correction or exception<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> Ignore the issue until the next maintenance cycle<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> Delete all EPM event records<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> Give all affected users unrestricted administrative rights<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Review the relevant EPM events, confirm the policy match, and implement a controlled correction or exception<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    When a policy causes unexpected disruption, administrators should use event information to understand exactly why the application was blocked or failed to elevate. The application may match a broader rule than intended, the trusted application definition may be incomplete, or the policy may be assigned to the wrong scope. After verifying the legitimate business requirement, the administrator can refine the rule, adjust targeting, or create a narrowly defined exception. This restores functionality without abandoning the security objective. Deleting events removes valuable troubleshooting evidence, while granting unrestricted administrator rights introduces unnecessary risk. Effective EPM operations depend on monitoring, testing, controlled policy changes, and carefully scoped exceptions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 18.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    What is the BEST reason to review EPM policy events after deploying a new least-privilege policy?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> To determine whether endpoint screens are bright enough<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> To validate policy behavior and identify legitimate applications that may require adjustment<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> To replace endpoint backups<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> To change network IP addresses<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2. To validate policy behavior and identify legitimate applications that may require adjustment<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Post-deployment event review verifies that a new policy behaves as intended under real user workloads. Administrators can identify approved applications that were unexpectedly blocked, applications that continue requesting elevation, suspicious software, or endpoints that did not receive the expected configuration. This feedback allows policy tuning while preserving the least-privilege goal. Monitoring is particularly important during phased rollouts because business applications may behave differently across departments or endpoint configurations. Reviewing events also creates evidence that the policy is functioning and provides data for future security decisions. Screen brightness, IP addressing, and backups are unrelated to validating privilege-management behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 19.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      An EPM-managed endpoint has not received a recently updated policy. Which troubleshooting area should the administrator investigate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Whether the endpoint agent is communicating properly and receiving current policy updates<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> The user’s email signature<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> The workstation’s wallpaper image<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> The building’s lighting system<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. Whether the endpoint agent is communicating properly and receiving current policy updates<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        The EPM agent on the endpoint must communicate with the management service and obtain the applicable policy configuration. If an endpoint continues using an older policy, the administrator should verify agent health, connectivity, policy assignment, synchronization status, service operation, and any relevant communication or agent logs. The endpoint may be offline, unable to reach the required service, assigned to an unexpected policy scope, or experiencing an agent-related issue. Troubleshooting should begin with the components directly involved in policy delivery before expanding into broader system investigation. Email signatures, wallpaper settings, and building controls do not affect whether the endpoint receives current CyberArk EPM policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 20.<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Which statement BEST describes the purpose of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in an enterprise security program?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> It replaces all endpoint, identity, and network security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> It gives every user unrestricted administrator access while recording activity<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> It is used only for software inventory and has no privilege-management function<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> It helps enforce least privilege, control application execution and elevation, reduce endpoint attack surface, and provide visibility into privilege-related activity**<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 4. It helps enforce least privilege, control application execution and elevation, reduce endpoint attack surface, and provide visibility into privilege-related activity<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager helps organizations reduce risk created by excessive endpoint privileges and uncontrolled application execution. It can support removal of permanent local administrator rights, controlled elevation of approved applications, application control, policy-based privilege decisions, and visibility into endpoint events. These capabilities can reduce opportunities for malware, unauthorized software, and users to make unrestricted privileged changes. EPM should be integrated with broader security practices such as identity management, vulnerability management, endpoint detection, patching, network controls, monitoring, and incident response. It does not eliminate the need for these other layers. Effective deployment also requires carefully scoped policies, testing, event review, exception management, and continuous refinement as applications and business requirements change.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full CyberArk EPM-DEF Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 1. An organization deploys CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager to reduce the number of users who have permanent local administrator rights. Which security principle is the organization MOST directly implementing? Least privilege Data replication High availability Network segmentation Correct Answer: 1. Least privilege Explanation: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19756"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19756"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19756\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19757,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19756\/revisions\/19757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19756"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19756"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19756"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}