{"id":20049,"date":"2026-09-23T10:39:07","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:39:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20049"},"modified":"2026-09-23T10:39:07","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:39:07","slug":"isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part3-q41-60","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part3-q41-60\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CRISC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part3 Q41-60"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 41<\/b><\/h3>\n

Which activity is MOST important when establishing an enterprise risk management framework?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Defining risk ownership and accountability<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Purchasing additional security tools<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Increasing the frequency of vulnerability scans<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Eliminating all identified risks<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Defining risk ownership and accountability is essential when establishing an enterprise risk management framework. Each significant risk should have an accountable owner who understands the risk, monitors changes, and coordinates appropriate responses. Without clear ownership, identified risks may remain unresolved or receive inconsistent treatment. Security tools and vulnerability assessments can support risk management, but they do not establish accountability by themselves. Similarly, eliminating every identified risk is generally unrealistic because organizations operate with limited resources and unavoidable uncertainty. A well-designed framework establishes responsibilities, governance structures, risk criteria, assessment processes, monitoring mechanisms, and reporting requirements so risks can be managed consistently across the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 42<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Which factor should be considered FIRST when determining the appropriate risk response?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Availability of security technologies<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Regulatory reporting frequency<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. The organization’s risk appetite<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Number of employees affected<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      An organization’s risk appetite is a fundamental consideration when determining an appropriate risk response. Risk appetite describes the amount and type of risk the organization is willing to accept while pursuing its objectives. A risk that falls within the approved appetite may be monitored or accepted, while a risk exceeding the appetite may require mitigation, transfer, avoidance, or another treatment. Although technology availability, regulatory requirements, and affected employees can influence the final decision, they should be evaluated in the context of established risk tolerance and business objectives. Aligning risk responses with risk appetite helps ensure that management decisions remain consistent with governance expectations and strategic priorities.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 43<\/b><\/h3>\n

      What is the PRIMARY purpose of a risk register?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. To replace internal audit reports<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. To document and track identified risks<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. To record employee performance issues<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. To maintain software licensing information<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        A risk register provides a centralized record of identified risks and important information associated with them. It commonly includes the risk description, affected assets or processes, likelihood, impact, risk owner, existing controls, treatment strategy, and current status. Maintaining this information helps management monitor risks and determine whether treatment activities are progressing as expected. A risk register does not replace internal audit reports, employee performance records, or software licensing documentation. Its primary purpose is to support consistent risk tracking and communication. By keeping risk information current, organizations can identify changes in exposure and ensure that responsible stakeholders remain aware of significant risks.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 44<\/b><\/h3>\n

        Which approach BEST helps identify risks associated with a new business process?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Reviewing only previous audit findings<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Waiting for incidents to occur<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Increasing employee security awareness training<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Conducting a structured risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          A structured risk assessment is the most effective approach for identifying risks associated with a new business process. The assessment can examine process objectives, assets, dependencies, threats, vulnerabilities, existing controls, and potential business impacts. This proactive approach allows risks to be identified before the process becomes fully operational. Reviewing previous audit findings can provide useful historical information but may not address new risks. Waiting for incidents is reactive and can expose the organization to unnecessary losses. Security awareness training is valuable for reducing human-related risks but does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the entire process. A structured assessment provides a systematic foundation for risk decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 45<\/b><\/h3>\n

          What is the PRIMARY objective of risk monitoring?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. To identify changes in risk exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. To eliminate the need for risk assessments<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. To increase the organization’s IT budget<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. To replace business continuity planning<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            The primary objective of risk monitoring is to identify changes in risk exposure over time. Business environments, technologies, threats, regulations, and organizational objectives can change, causing previously acceptable risks to become more significant. Continuous monitoring helps management determine whether risk levels remain within established thresholds and whether existing controls continue to operate effectively. Risk monitoring does not eliminate the need for periodic risk assessments because detailed assessments may still be necessary when significant changes occur. It also does not directly determine IT budgets or replace business continuity planning. Effective monitoring provides timely information that enables management to reassess risks and adjust treatment strategies when necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 46<\/b><\/h3>\n

            Which metric is MOST useful for determining whether a risk remains within tolerance?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Number of employees in the organization<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Total number of IT assets<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Risk exposure compared with the approved threshold<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. Number of security policies published<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Comparing current risk exposure with an approved risk threshold is the most useful way to determine whether a risk remains within tolerance. Risk tolerance defines the acceptable level of variation around the organization’s risk appetite or objectives. Monitoring exposure against established thresholds allows management to identify when escalation or additional treatment is required. Employee counts, IT asset totals, and the number of published policies may provide contextual information but do not directly indicate whether a specific risk is within tolerance. Effective risk metrics should be measurable, relevant to business objectives, and capable of showing meaningful changes in risk exposure so that decision-makers can take timely corrective action.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 47<\/b><\/h3>\n

              Who should ultimately approve the acceptance of a significant residual risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. The help desk supervisor<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. The risk owner or appropriate management authority<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. The external auditor<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. The system administrator<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Significant residual risk should be accepted by the designated risk owner or an appropriate management authority with sufficient responsibility and authority. Risk acceptance represents a business decision because management is acknowledging that a particular level of exposure will remain after controls and treatment activities are considered. Technical staff may provide important information about vulnerabilities and controls, while auditors can provide independent assurance, but neither should normally accept business risk on behalf of management. Proper authorization ensures that accepted risks are visible, documented, and aligned with organizational risk appetite and governance requirements. The level of approval should also correspond to the significance and potential impact of the residual risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 48<\/b><\/h3>\n

                What should be performed BEFORE selecting risk treatment options?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Determine the organization’s office locations<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Purchase monitoring software<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Identify and assess the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Conduct employee performance reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Risk identification and assessment should occur before selecting risk treatment options. Management needs to understand the nature of the risk, its likelihood, potential impact, existing controls, and resulting exposure before deciding how it should be treated. Possible treatments may include mitigation, avoidance, transfer, or acceptance. Selecting a treatment without understanding the risk can result in inappropriate resource allocation or inadequate controls. Purchasing monitoring software or conducting unrelated administrative activities does not establish the information needed for treatment decisions. A structured assessment provides the evidence required to compare treatment options and determine which response is appropriate based on business objectives, risk appetite, regulatory requirements, and available resources.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 49<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  Which condition MOST strongly indicates that a risk treatment has been effective?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. The number of policies has increased<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. The security department has hired additional staff<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. The risk exposure has been reduced to an acceptable level<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. The organization has purchased new software<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A risk treatment is effective when it reduces the organization’s risk exposure to an acceptable level consistent with approved risk criteria. The objective of treatment is not simply to introduce additional controls, purchase technology, or increase staffing. Those activities may support risk reduction, but their value must ultimately be evaluated based on their effect on risk. After treatment is implemented, management should verify whether the likelihood, impact, or overall exposure has been reduced as expected. If the remaining exposure is still above the organization’s tolerance, additional treatment or escalation may be necessary. Effectiveness should therefore be measured against defined risk objectives and thresholds rather than simply counting implemented controls.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 50<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    Which information is MOST important when communicating a high business risk to senior management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Detailed technical configuration settings<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Business impact and recommended response<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Names of all system administrators<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Number of security alerts generated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Senior management generally needs information that supports business decisions, particularly the potential business impact and recommended response associated with a significant risk. Effective communication should explain how the risk could affect business objectives, financial performance, regulatory obligations, operations, customers, or reputation. Excessive technical details may obscure the key decision points unless they are directly relevant. Names of administrators and raw security alert counts are usually supporting information rather than the primary message. Risk communication should be concise, accurate, and aligned with the audience’s responsibilities. Presenting the business consequences, risk exposure, treatment alternatives, and required management decision helps senior leaders make informed risk decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 51<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Which activity BEST supports ongoing identification of emerging risks?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Continuous monitoring of internal and external changes<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Reviewing the risk register once every five years<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Removing closed risks from all records<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Limiting risk assessments to financial systems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Continuous monitoring of internal and external changes provides strong support for identifying emerging risks. Organizations should monitor changes in technology, business strategy, regulations, threat environments, suppliers, market conditions, and operational processes. These changes can introduce new threats or alter existing risk exposure. Reviewing a risk register only occasionally may cause emerging issues to remain unnoticed for extended periods. Limiting assessments to financial systems ignores risks affecting other important business processes and assets. Closed risks may be archived according to organizational requirements, but removing historical information does not help identify emerging threats. Effective monitoring creates an ongoing feedback mechanism that allows risk management activities to adapt as conditions change.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 52<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        What is the PRIMARY reason for assigning a risk owner?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. To ensure accountability for managing the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. To transfer all risk to the IT department<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. To eliminate the need for management approval<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. To guarantee that the risk will never occur<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A risk owner is assigned to establish accountability for managing a specific risk. The owner is responsible for understanding the risk, monitoring its status, coordinating treatment activities, and ensuring that appropriate decisions are escalated when necessary. Assigning ownership does not mean that the risk is transferred entirely to the IT department, nor does it eliminate the need for management approval when decisions exceed the owner’s authority. No risk owner can guarantee that a risk will never occur because risk management focuses on reducing exposure to acceptable levels rather than achieving absolute certainty. Clear ownership strengthens governance by ensuring that significant risks have an accountable individual or organizational function responsible for oversight.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 53<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          Which factor is MOST important when prioritizing risks for treatment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Age of the risk entry<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Potential impact and likelihood<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Number of pages in the risk report<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Size of the security team<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Potential impact and likelihood are fundamental factors when prioritizing risks for treatment. A risk with a high probability of occurrence and significant business consequences generally requires greater attention than a risk with minimal exposure. Organizations may also consider factors such as regulatory obligations, risk appetite, control effectiveness, and resource availability. The age of a risk entry or the size of the security team does not directly determine its significance. Likewise, the length of a risk report provides no meaningful indication of risk priority. A consistent prioritization methodology helps management allocate resources toward risks that could have the greatest effect on business objectives while maintaining alignment with established risk criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 54<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            What should a risk owner do when residual risk exceeds the approved tolerance?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Ignore the difference until the next annual review<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Delete the risk from the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Escalate and initiate appropriate additional treatment<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Transfer responsibility to internal audit<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              When residual risk exceeds approved tolerance, the risk owner should escalate the situation and initiate appropriate additional treatment. Residual risk represents the exposure remaining after existing controls and treatments have been considered. If that exposure exceeds the organization’s approved threshold, management should determine whether additional controls, risk transfer, avoidance, or other actions are necessary. Ignoring the issue could leave the organization exposed to unacceptable consequences. Deleting the risk does not reduce exposure, and transferring responsibility to internal audit is inappropriate because audit functions generally provide independent assurance rather than owning operational risks. Timely escalation ensures that management can make an informed decision consistent with risk appetite and governance requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 55<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              Which activity provides the BEST evidence that a security control is operating as intended?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Reviewing the control’s documented design only<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Testing the control’s operation and reviewing results<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. Asking employees whether the control exists<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Increasing the number of security policies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Testing the control’s operation and reviewing the results provides stronger evidence that a security control is functioning as intended. Documentation can demonstrate how a control is supposed to work, but it does not necessarily prove that the control operates effectively in practice. Interviews and employee responses may provide useful supporting information but can be incomplete or inaccurate. Adding more policies also does not demonstrate operational effectiveness. Control testing can involve inspection, observation, reperformance, automated evidence, sampling, or other appropriate techniques. The testing approach should be based on the nature and importance of the control. Results can then be compared with defined control objectives and risk requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 56<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Why should risk assessments be aligned with business objectives?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. To ensure risk decisions support organizational priorities<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. To eliminate the need for security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. To reduce the number of business processes<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. To ensure every risk is accepted<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Risk assessments should be aligned with business objectives so that risk decisions support the organization’s strategic and operational priorities. Risks matter because they can affect the achievement of business objectives. Understanding those objectives helps determine which assets, processes, services, and outcomes are most important and therefore require greater protection. Alignment also helps management allocate limited resources according to business priorities rather than focusing solely on technical concerns. It does not eliminate the need for security controls or require that every risk be accepted. Instead, it provides the context needed to evaluate risk significance and select appropriate treatment strategies while maintaining consistency with organizational goals and risk appetite.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 57<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  Which situation MOST likely requires a reassessment of an existing risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. A major change to the underlying business process<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. An unchanged organizational chart<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. A routine employee meeting<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Printing additional copies of an existing policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A major change to an underlying business process can significantly alter threats, vulnerabilities, assets, dependencies, controls, and potential impacts. Therefore, such a change is a strong reason to reassess the associated risk. Risk assessments should not be treated as static documents because organizational environments evolve over time. Routine meetings or printing additional policy copies generally do not create significant changes in risk exposure. Similarly, an unchanged organizational chart provides little reason for reassessment by itself. Trigger-based reassessment helps organizations respond to meaningful changes such as new technologies, acquisitions, regulatory requirements, major process changes, security incidents, or changes in business strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 58<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    What is the PRIMARY purpose of risk indicators?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. To provide information about changes in risk conditions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. To replace all security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. To eliminate management oversight<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. To guarantee compliance with every regulation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Risk indicators provide information that helps organizations identify changes in risk conditions. They can be designed to show increasing exposure, emerging threats, control weaknesses, or other conditions that may require management attention. Useful indicators should be measurable, relevant, and connected to meaningful risk thresholds. Indicators do not replace security controls or eliminate management oversight. They also cannot guarantee compliance with every regulation because regulatory compliance requires broader governance, control, monitoring, and assurance activities. By monitoring appropriate indicators over time, organizations can identify trends and potential warning signs earlier, enabling risk owners and management to investigate changes and take corrective action before exposure becomes more significant.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 59<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which approach BEST ensures that risk treatment decisions are consistently applied across an organization?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Allowing every employee to choose a different methodology<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Using documented risk criteria and treatment procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Treating only risks reported by external auditors<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Selecting controls based solely on cost<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Documented risk criteria and treatment procedures help ensure that risk decisions are applied consistently across an organization. Standardized criteria provide a common basis for evaluating likelihood, impact, tolerance, and treatment requirements. Procedures also clarify responsibilities, approval requirements, escalation paths, and monitoring expectations. Allowing every employee to use a different methodology can produce inconsistent and potentially conflicting decisions. Restricting attention to externally reported risks overlooks internally identified exposures, while selecting controls solely according to cost ignores effectiveness, business impact, compliance obligations, and risk appetite. A consistent framework improves comparability between risks and supports transparent, repeatable decision-making across different departments and business units.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 60<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        What is the MOST important characteristic of a useful risk report for senior management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. It contains maximum technical detail<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. It includes every historical security event<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. It clearly communicates significant risks and required decisions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. It focuses exclusively on cybersecurity terminology<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          A useful risk report for senior management should clearly communicate significant risks, their potential business effects, current exposure, and decisions or actions required from management. Senior leaders need information that supports governance and resource decisions rather than excessive technical detail. A report containing every historical security event may obscure important information, while highly technical terminology can make business implications difficult to understand. Effective reporting should be concise, accurate, timely, and aligned with organizational objectives and risk appetite. It should highlight material changes, risk trends, treatment status, exceptions, and areas requiring management attention. Clear communication enables senior management to understand the organization’s risk position and make informed decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 41 Which activity is MOST important when establishing an enterprise risk management framework? Defining risk ownership and accountability Purchasing additional security tools Increasing the frequency of vulnerability scans Eliminating all identified risks Correct Answer: 1 Explanation Defining risk ownership and accountability is essential […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20049"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20049"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20050,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20049\/revisions\/20050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}