{"id":20051,"date":"2026-09-23T10:39:27","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:39:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20051"},"modified":"2026-09-23T10:39:27","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:39:27","slug":"isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part4-q61-80","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part4-q61-80\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CRISC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part4 Q61-80"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 61<\/b><\/h3>\n

Which factor is MOST important when determining the business impact of a risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Number of security tools deployed<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Potential effect on business objectives<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Number of IT employees<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Age of the information system<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    The potential effect on business objectives is the most important factor when determining business impact. Risk exists because an event or condition can affect the organization’s ability to achieve its objectives. Business impact may involve financial losses, operational disruption, regulatory consequences, customer effects, or reputational damage. The number of security tools, IT employees, or age of a system may provide supporting context but does not directly establish the significance of a risk. Assessing business impact allows management to understand the consequences of risk and prioritize treatment appropriately. This approach also helps ensure that risk decisions remain aligned with organizational priorities, risk appetite, and overall business strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 62<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Which activity should be performed FIRST when identifying risks for a critical business process?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Identify the process objectives and dependencies<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Purchase additional security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Conduct an external audit<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Develop incident response procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Identifying the objectives and dependencies of a critical business process should occur first because risk identification requires an understanding of what the process is intended to accomplish and what resources it depends upon. These dependencies may include applications, information, personnel, suppliers, infrastructure, and other processes. Once the process context is understood, threats, vulnerabilities, and potential impacts can be identified more accurately. Purchasing controls or developing response procedures before understanding the process may result in inappropriate decisions. An external audit can provide useful assurance, but it is not normally the first step in identifying risks. Establishing business context creates a foundation for a meaningful risk assessment.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 63<\/b><\/h3>\n

      What is the PRIMARY purpose of a risk assessment methodology?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. To standardize how risks are identified and evaluated<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. To eliminate all organizational risks<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. To reduce the number of business processes<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. To replace executive decision-making<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        A risk assessment methodology provides a consistent approach for identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks. Standardization allows different business units and risk owners to assess risks using common criteria, making results easier to compare and prioritize. A methodology does not eliminate risk because some level of exposure is unavoidable in business operations. It also does not reduce business processes or replace management decisions. Instead, it provides structured information that supports informed decision-making. A well-defined methodology typically establishes assessment criteria, likelihood and impact scales, risk calculation methods, documentation requirements, and escalation thresholds. Consistency improves the reliability and usefulness of risk information throughout the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 64<\/b><\/h3>\n

        Which action is MOST appropriate when a risk is within the organization’s approved risk appetite?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Automatically eliminate the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Immediately transfer the risk to a third party<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Monitor and manage the risk according to established criteria<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Escalate every instance to the board<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          When a risk falls within the organization’s approved risk appetite, it may be managed and monitored according to established risk criteria. This does not necessarily mean that no controls or oversight are required. Management should continue monitoring the risk to ensure that changing conditions do not cause exposure to exceed established tolerance levels. Automatically eliminating or transferring every acceptable risk would often consume unnecessary resources. Likewise, escalating every acceptable risk to the board would not be efficient. Risk appetite provides guidance for determining which risks require additional treatment and which can be managed within existing controls. Appropriate monitoring ensures that accepted exposure remains aligned with organizational expectations.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 65<\/b><\/h3>\n

          Which source provides the BEST information about risks introduced by a third-party service provider?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. The provider’s marketing brochure<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. A formal third-party risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. An employee satisfaction survey<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. The organization’s annual financial statement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            A formal third-party risk assessment provides the most relevant information about risks introduced by a service provider. It can evaluate the provider’s security controls, contractual obligations, data handling practices, business continuity capabilities, compliance requirements, and potential impact on the organization. Marketing material may describe services positively but usually does not provide sufficient evidence of control effectiveness. Employee surveys and financial statements address different areas and are not designed to evaluate third-party security or operational risk. Third-party assessments should be performed using defined criteria and may include questionnaires, documentation reviews, independent assurance reports, and other evidence. This helps management make informed decisions about supplier-related exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 66<\/b><\/h3>\n

            What is the PRIMARY benefit of establishing risk thresholds?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. They provide objective points for escalation and action<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. They eliminate the need for risk ownership<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. They guarantee that incidents will not occur<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. They replace all security monitoring activities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Risk thresholds provide objective points at which management action or escalation may be required. By establishing measurable limits, organizations can determine when risk exposure has moved beyond acceptable levels. This improves consistency because decisions are based on predefined criteria rather than subjective judgment alone. Risk thresholds do not eliminate ownership or guarantee that incidents will not occur. They also complement rather than replace security monitoring. Effective thresholds should reflect organizational risk appetite, tolerance, business objectives, and regulatory requirements where applicable. Monitoring against these thresholds allows risk owners to identify deteriorating conditions and initiate additional treatment or escalation before exposure becomes unacceptable.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 67<\/b><\/h3>\n

              Which situation represents residual risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Risk before any controls are implemented<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. Risk remaining after controls are applied<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Risk that has never been identified<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. Risk that has been completely eliminated<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Residual risk is the amount of risk that remains after controls and other risk treatment measures have been implemented. Controls are intended to reduce the likelihood or impact of risk, but they rarely eliminate uncertainty completely. Understanding residual risk is important because management must determine whether the remaining exposure falls within approved risk tolerance. Inherent risk describes exposure before controls are considered, while unidentified risk has not yet been properly assessed. A completely eliminated risk would not represent residual exposure. Risk owners should monitor residual risk and escalate it when it exceeds established thresholds. This supports informed decisions about additional controls, acceptance, transfer, or other treatment options.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 68<\/b><\/h3>\n

                Which factor should MOST influence the frequency of risk monitoring?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. The organization’s office size<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. The color of the risk dashboard<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. The volatility and significance of the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. The number of employees in finance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  The volatility and significance of a risk should strongly influence how frequently it is monitored. Risks that can change rapidly or have significant potential consequences generally require more frequent monitoring than stable, low-impact risks. Monitoring frequency should also consider changes in the threat environment, regulatory requirements, control effectiveness, and business conditions. Office size, dashboard appearance, and unrelated employee counts do not provide meaningful criteria for determining monitoring frequency. A risk-based monitoring approach allows organizations to focus resources where changes in exposure could have the greatest consequences. Monitoring schedules should be reviewed periodically to ensure they remain appropriate as the organization’s environment and risk profile evolve.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 69<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  Which activity BEST demonstrates that risk management is integrated into business operations?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Risk decisions are included in business planning and operational processes<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Risk management is performed only by the security department<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. Risk reports are created but never reviewed<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Risk assessments are performed only after incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Risk management is integrated into business operations when risk considerations are incorporated into planning, decision-making, projects, processes, and resource allocation. This means business owners and management consider risk when establishing objectives and making operational decisions rather than treating risk as an isolated security function. Restricting risk management to the security department can overlook business, financial, operational, and strategic risks. Producing reports without reviewing them provides little value, while conducting assessments only after incidents is reactive. Integration ensures that risk information becomes part of normal management activities and that decisions consider both opportunities and potential adverse consequences within the organization’s established risk framework.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 70<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    What is the MOST appropriate response when a risk cannot be economically mitigated to zero?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Ignore the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Determine whether the remaining exposure is acceptable<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Remove the risk from the register<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Require unlimited security spending<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Most organizational risks cannot be economically reduced to zero. When complete elimination is impractical, management should determine whether the remaining exposure is acceptable based on risk appetite, tolerance, business objectives, regulatory obligations, and available treatment options. Additional controls may be implemented if the residual exposure is too high. Ignoring the risk or removing it from the risk register does not reduce the underlying exposure. Unlimited spending is also inappropriate because risk management requires balancing protection with business value and available resources. The objective is to manage risk to an acceptable level rather than attempting to achieve absolute elimination regardless of cost or operational consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 71<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Which document BEST defines responsibilities for managing organizational risks?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Risk governance framework<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Employee vacation schedule<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Network topology diagram<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Software installation guide<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        A risk governance framework can define responsibilities, authority, accountability, decision-making structures, escalation paths, and oversight requirements for managing organizational risks. Clear governance is essential because risk management involves multiple stakeholders across business and technical functions. A network diagram or software guide may provide useful technical information but does not establish enterprise-level risk responsibilities. Similarly, an employee vacation schedule has no meaningful role in risk governance. Effective governance clarifies who owns risks, who approves risk acceptance, who monitors risk exposure, and how significant issues are escalated. This structure helps ensure that risk decisions are consistent, accountable, and aligned with organizational objectives and management expectations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 72<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        What is the PRIMARY reason to maintain historical risk information?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. To support trend analysis and future decision-making<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. To increase the number of risk entries<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. To avoid performing future assessments<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. To replace current risk monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Historical risk information supports trend analysis and future decision-making. Comparing risk conditions over time can reveal recurring issues, changes in exposure, control effectiveness, and patterns that may indicate emerging concerns. Historical records can also provide useful evidence for management reviews, audits, and lessons learned. Maintaining historical information does not eliminate the need for current assessments or monitoring because risk conditions can change significantly. Simply increasing the number of entries provides no benefit unless the information is meaningful and maintained appropriately. A well-managed history allows organizations to understand how risks have evolved and whether previous treatment decisions achieved their intended results.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 73<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          Which approach is MOST effective for ensuring risk treatment aligns with business priorities?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Selecting controls based only on technical preferences<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Prioritizing treatment according to business impact and risk appetite<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Treating every risk identically<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Allowing vendors to determine organizational priorities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Prioritizing treatment according to business impact and risk appetite helps ensure that risk management supports organizational priorities. Risks affecting critical objectives or exceeding established tolerance may require greater attention and resources than lower-impact exposures. Technical preferences can influence control selection but should not replace business considerations. Treating every risk identically can result in inefficient resource allocation because risks differ in likelihood, impact, and importance. Vendors can provide recommendations and services but should not determine the organization’s priorities independently. Aligning treatment decisions with business objectives ensures that risk management contributes to organizational value while maintaining exposure within approved boundaries.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 74<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            What should be done when a key risk indicator consistently exceeds its defined threshold?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Investigate the cause and determine whether escalation or treatment is required<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Delete the indicator<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Increase the threshold without analysis<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Ignore the results until year-end<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A consistently exceeded risk indicator threshold should trigger investigation and evaluation of whether escalation or additional treatment is required. The organization should determine why the indicator has exceeded its threshold, validate the data, assess the resulting risk exposure, and determine whether management action is necessary. Simply increasing the threshold without analysis could conceal an important change in risk conditions. Deleting the indicator removes useful visibility, while waiting until year-end may delay necessary action. Risk indicators are intended to provide early warning of changing conditions. When thresholds are repeatedly exceeded, the risk owner should evaluate whether the underlying assumptions, controls, processes, or risk treatment strategies need to be changed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 75<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              Which activity is MOST useful for validating assumptions made during a risk assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Reviewing relevant evidence and testing assumptions<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Increasing the number of risk owners<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. Removing low-level risks<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Changing the risk scoring system without analysis<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Reviewing relevant evidence and testing assumptions is the most useful way to validate conclusions made during a risk assessment. Risk assessments often depend on assumptions regarding likelihood, impact, control effectiveness, asset value, threat activity, or business dependencies. Evidence such as historical incidents, system data, control test results, threat intelligence, and business records can help confirm whether those assumptions remain reasonable. Adding risk owners or changing scoring methods does not validate the underlying assumptions. Removing low-level risks can also distort the assessment. Periodically validating assumptions improves the accuracy and reliability of risk information and helps management make decisions based on current and credible evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 76<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Which risk response involves shifting the financial consequences of a risk to another party?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Avoidance<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Acceptance<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Transfer<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Mitigation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Risk transfer involves shifting some or all of the financial or other consequences of a risk to another party. Examples can include insurance, contractual arrangements, warranties, or outsourcing agreements where appropriate. Transfer does not necessarily eliminate the underlying risk because the organization may retain residual responsibilities or consequences. Avoidance involves changing activities to discontinue exposure, acceptance involves knowingly retaining the risk, and mitigation involves reducing likelihood or impact through controls or other actions. The suitability of transfer depends on contractual terms, cost, regulatory requirements, and the organization’s risk appetite. Management should evaluate whether the transferred arrangement actually provides the intended level of risk reduction.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 77<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  What is the PRIMARY purpose of risk escalation?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. To ensure risks exceeding authority or tolerance receive appropriate management attention<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. To transfer all risks to senior executives<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. To eliminate the need for risk owners<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. To increase the number of risk reports<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Risk escalation ensures that risks exceeding defined thresholds, authority levels, or management capabilities receive appropriate attention from individuals with sufficient decision-making authority. Escalation may be necessary when residual risk exceeds tolerance, when treatment requires significant resources, or when a risk has strategic or regulatory implications. Escalation does not mean transferring ownership of every risk to senior executives. Risk owners generally remain accountable for managing their assigned risks while management provides direction or approval where necessary. The objective is timely and appropriate decision-making rather than simply producing more reports. Clearly defined escalation criteria help ensure that significant risks are addressed before they create unacceptable business consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 78<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    Which characteristic is MOST important for a risk assessment result to be useful to management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. It is consistent, relevant, and supported by reliable information<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. It contains the maximum number of pages<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. It uses highly technical terminology<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. It includes only risks identified by IT personnel<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Risk assessment results should be consistent, relevant, and supported by reliable information so management can use them for decision-making. Consistency allows risks to be compared using common criteria, while relevance ensures that the assessment addresses business objectives and significant exposures. Reliable evidence improves confidence in the assessment conclusions. A lengthy report is not necessarily more useful, and excessive technical terminology may make business implications difficult to understand. Restricting risk identification to IT personnel can also overlook operational, financial, legal, strategic, and third-party risks. Effective assessments communicate meaningful information in a form that allows decision-makers to understand exposure, priorities, and required actions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 79<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which event should MOST likely trigger an immediate review of related risks?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. A significant change in the threat environment<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. A routine staff meeting<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Reprinting an existing procedure<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Changing office furniture<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A significant change in the threat environment can immediately alter the organization’s risk exposure and should therefore trigger a review of related risks. New attack techniques, major vulnerabilities, changes in threat actors, or significant changes in threat activity can affect the likelihood and potential impact of existing risks. Routine administrative activities such as staff meetings, reprinting procedures, or changing office furniture normally do not have a meaningful effect on risk exposure. Trigger-based reviews help organizations respond quickly to material changes rather than waiting for scheduled assessments. This approach is especially important for critical assets and processes where changes in the external environment can rapidly increase risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 80<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        Which outcome BEST demonstrates effective enterprise risk management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Every identified risk has been eliminated<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. All security controls have been implemented<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Risk exposure is understood and managed within approved boundaries<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. The organization has increased its security budget<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Effective enterprise risk management means that significant risk exposure is understood, communicated, monitored, and managed within approved boundaries. Organizations cannot realistically eliminate every risk, and implementing every possible security control is neither practical nor necessarily aligned with business priorities. Similarly, increasing the security budget does not by itself demonstrate effective risk management. The focus should be on achieving an appropriate balance between business objectives, risk exposure, controls, resources, and management expectations. When risks are consistently identified, assessed, treated, monitored, and escalated according to established governance and risk appetite, management can make informed decisions while maintaining exposure within acceptable limits.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 61 Which factor is MOST important when determining the business impact of a risk? Number of security tools deployed Potential effect on business objectives Number of IT employees Age of the information system Correct Answer: 2 Explanation The potential effect on business objectives […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20051"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20051"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20051\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20052,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20051\/revisions\/20052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}