{"id":20053,"date":"2026-09-23T10:39:44","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:39:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20053"},"modified":"2026-09-23T10:39:44","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:39:44","slug":"isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part5-q81-100","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part5-q81-100\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CRISC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part5 Q81-100"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 81<\/b><\/h3>\n

Which activity is MOST important when establishing risk context?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Purchasing security software<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Increasing audit frequency<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Identifying business objectives and relevant stakeholders<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Replacing existing controls<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Establishing risk context requires understanding the organization’s business objectives, processes, stakeholders, and operating environment. This information provides the foundation for identifying and evaluating risks in a meaningful way. Without a clear understanding of what the organization is trying to achieve, risk assessments may focus on technical issues that do not have significant business consequences. Security software, audits, and controls can support risk management but do not establish the initial context. A well-defined context also considers legal, regulatory, contractual, and organizational requirements. By understanding these factors first, risk owners can evaluate threats and vulnerabilities according to their potential effect on business objectives and make relevant treatment decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 82<\/b><\/h3>\n

    What is the PRIMARY purpose of identifying risk criteria before conducting an assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. To establish a consistent basis for evaluating risks<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. To guarantee that all risks will be accepted<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. To reduce the number of business processes<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. To eliminate the need for risk owners<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Risk criteria establish a consistent basis for evaluating and comparing risks. They can define how likelihood, impact, risk appetite, tolerance, and other relevant factors should be interpreted. Without established criteria, different assessors may evaluate similar risks differently, resulting in inconsistent prioritization and management decisions. Risk criteria do not eliminate the need for risk ownership or guarantee that risks will be accepted. They also have no purpose in reducing business processes. Establishing criteria before an assessment helps ensure that risk results are objective, repeatable, and aligned with organizational expectations. Management can then use the results to prioritize treatment and determine whether particular exposures require escalation or additional controls.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 83<\/b><\/h3>\n

      Which source is MOST useful for identifying risks associated with a new technology implementation?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. An outdated employee directory<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Historical payroll records<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Office maintenance schedules<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. A current risk assessment and technology-specific threat information<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        A current risk assessment combined with relevant threat information provides useful insight into risks associated with a new technology implementation. New technology may introduce vulnerabilities, dependencies, configuration issues, privacy concerns, integration risks, and new attack paths. Current threat intelligence can help identify realistic threats affecting the technology, while a structured assessment evaluates their potential business impact. Historical administrative records do not normally provide sufficient information about technology-related risk. Risk identification should also consider architecture, data flows, third-party dependencies, security requirements, and control capabilities. Evaluating these factors before implementation helps management identify potential exposures early and determine appropriate safeguards.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 84<\/b><\/h3>\n

        Which factor should be considered when determining whether a risk can be accepted?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. The number of security policies available<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Whether the residual risk is within approved tolerance<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. The age of the risk owner<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. The number of meetings held by management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          Risk acceptance should be based on whether the residual risk falls within the organization’s approved tolerance and other applicable requirements. Management should understand the remaining exposure after controls and treatment have been considered and determine whether it is consistent with risk appetite. Regulatory, contractual, financial, and operational requirements may also affect the decision. The number of policies, meetings, or unrelated personal characteristics does not determine whether a risk is acceptable. Formal acceptance should be documented and authorized by the appropriate individual or authority. This ensures that management understands the exposure being retained and that the decision is consistent with established governance requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 85<\/b><\/h3>\n

          What is the BEST reason to involve business process owners in risk assessments?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. They replace the internal audit function<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. They approve every security configuration<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. They understand the process objectives and potential business impacts<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. They can eliminate all technical vulnerabilities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            Business process owners should participate in risk assessments because they understand the objectives, dependencies, critical activities, and potential business impacts associated with their processes. Their knowledge helps risk professionals distinguish between technically possible threats and risks that could materially affect business operations. Process owners may also identify important dependencies that technical teams could overlook. Their involvement does not mean they replace internal audit or become responsible for every technical configuration. Effective risk assessment combines business and technical perspectives to create a complete view of exposure. Collaboration between process owners, risk professionals, security teams, and other stakeholders improves the accuracy and relevance of risk decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 86<\/b><\/h3>\n

            Which measure BEST indicates that risk treatment activities are progressing as planned?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Treatment milestones and risk exposure are monitored against defined targets<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. The number of emails sent by the risk team<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. The number of meetings scheduled<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. The total number of security employees<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Monitoring treatment milestones and risk exposure against defined targets provides the strongest indication of whether risk treatment is progressing as planned. Treatment plans should include clear activities, responsibilities, deadlines, expected outcomes, and measures of effectiveness. Monitoring these elements allows management to identify delays, ineffective controls, resource issues, or unexpected changes in exposure. The number of emails, meetings, or employees does not directly demonstrate treatment effectiveness or progress. Regular monitoring should determine whether actions have been completed and whether they produced the intended reduction in risk. If progress is inadequate, the risk owner can escalate the issue or modify the treatment strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 87<\/b><\/h3>\n

              Which action is MOST appropriate when a risk assessment identifies an unacceptable level of exposure?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Remove the risk from the register<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. Automatically accept the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Ignore the result until the next annual review<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. Develop and implement an appropriate risk treatment plan<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                When a risk assessment identifies unacceptable exposure, an appropriate risk treatment plan should be developed and implemented. Treatment may involve reducing the likelihood or impact, avoiding the activity, transferring some consequences, or obtaining authorized acceptance if circumstances change. Simply removing or ignoring the risk does not change the underlying exposure. Automatic acceptance is also inappropriate when the risk exceeds approved tolerance. The treatment plan should identify responsibilities, required resources, timelines, expected outcomes, and monitoring requirements. Management should then verify whether the treatment reduces the exposure to an acceptable level. This approach ensures that significant risks receive appropriate attention and remain aligned with organizational risk criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 88<\/b><\/h3>\n

                Which activity BEST supports the identification of control gaps?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Increasing the number of risk reports<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Comparing existing controls with defined control requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Reviewing employee attendance records<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Changing the risk owner<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Comparing existing controls with defined control requirements helps identify gaps between what should be in place and what actually exists. The comparison can consider control design, implementation, operating effectiveness, regulatory requirements, business needs, and risk treatment objectives. Identifying gaps allows management to determine whether additional controls or improvements are necessary. Increasing reports or changing risk ownership does not directly identify missing or ineffective controls. Employee attendance records may be relevant to specific risks but are not generally sufficient for a broad control-gap analysis. A structured gap assessment provides useful evidence for prioritizing remediation activities and determining whether residual risk remains above the organization’s approved tolerance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 89<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  Which characteristic makes a risk statement MOST useful?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. It focuses only on the control owner<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. It avoids describing business consequences<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. It clearly describes the cause, event, and potential impact<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. It contains only technical terminology<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    A useful risk statement clearly communicates the cause or threat, the potential risk event, and the resulting impact on the organization. This structure helps stakeholders understand how a condition could lead to an event and how that event could affect business objectives. Risk statements that contain only technical terminology may be difficult for business stakeholders to understand. Focusing solely on the control owner does not explain the exposure, and omitting business consequences makes prioritization more difficult. Clear risk statements support consistent assessment, communication, treatment planning, and monitoring. They also help management understand why a risk matters and what outcomes could occur if the risk materializes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 90<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    What is the PRIMARY purpose of risk aggregation?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. To reduce the number of security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. To replace risk assessments<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. To eliminate individual risk owners<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. To understand the combined exposure from multiple related risks<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Risk aggregation helps management understand the combined exposure created by multiple individual risks. Several risks may affect the same business objective, asset, process, or dependency, and their combined effect may be greater than when each risk is considered separately. Aggregation can therefore provide a broader view of enterprise exposure and support more informed prioritization. It does not eliminate individual risk ownership or replace detailed risk assessments. Reducing the number of controls is also not its purpose. Effective aggregation should consider relationships, dependencies, common causes, and potential cumulative impacts. This enables management to identify concentrations of risk and allocate resources more effectively across the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 91<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Which factor is MOST important when assessing the effectiveness of a risk treatment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Whether the treatment achieved the intended risk reduction<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. The number of employees involved<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. The cost of the original assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. The length of the treatment document<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        The effectiveness of a risk treatment should primarily be evaluated based on whether it achieved the intended reduction in risk exposure. A treatment may be expensive or involve many employees, but those factors do not demonstrate that it actually reduced likelihood, impact, or overall exposure. Management should define expected outcomes and measurable indicators before or during implementation so effectiveness can later be evaluated objectively. If the treatment does not achieve its intended outcome, additional controls or alternative strategies may be required. Reviewing actual results against established risk objectives provides stronger assurance than relying on activity counts, documentation length, or implementation effort alone.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 92<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        Which event should trigger a review of third-party risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. A routine internal staff meeting<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. Printing an existing vendor contract<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. A significant change in the provider’s services or security environment<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. A change in office furniture<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A significant change in a third-party provider’s services, technology, ownership, security environment, or operating conditions can materially change the organization’s risk exposure. Such changes should trigger a review to determine whether existing controls, contracts, assessments, and monitoring arrangements remain appropriate. Third-party relationships can create risks involving data protection, availability, confidentiality, compliance, and operational dependency. Routine internal meetings or administrative activities normally do not require a reassessment of supplier risk. Organizations should establish clear triggers for reassessment, including major service changes, security incidents, regulatory changes, material control weaknesses, or changes in criticality. Regular monitoring combined with trigger-based reviews helps maintain effective third-party risk oversight.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 93<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          What is the PRIMARY benefit of using quantitative risk analysis when appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. It eliminates the need for management judgment<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. It provides numerical estimates that can support financial decision-making<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. It guarantees precise predictions of future incidents<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. It removes uncertainty from risk decisions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Quantitative risk analysis can provide numerical estimates that support financial and resource-related decision-making. By assigning numerical values to factors such as probability, frequency, and potential loss, organizations may estimate expected exposure and compare treatment alternatives. Quantitative analysis does not guarantee precise predictions because risk estimates depend on assumptions and the quality of available data. It also does not eliminate management judgment or uncertainty. In some situations, qualitative analysis may be more practical when reliable numerical data is unavailable. The choice of methodology should depend on the nature of the risk, decision requirements, available information, and organizational risk framework. Both approaches can support informed risk decisions when applied appropriately.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 94<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            Which approach is MOST appropriate when reliable numerical data is unavailable?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Use a structured qualitative assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Automatically classify the risk as low<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Invent precise financial values<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Ignore the risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              When reliable numerical data is unavailable, a structured qualitative assessment can provide a practical way to evaluate risk. Qualitative methods can use defined categories such as low, moderate, high, or critical, supported by clear criteria for likelihood and impact. This approach avoids creating false precision from unsupported numerical assumptions. Organizations should document the basis for qualitative judgments and apply the criteria consistently. Inventing financial values can produce misleading results, while ignoring or automatically lowering the risk does not provide sound risk management. As better data becomes available, the organization can refine the assessment. The important objective is to produce useful and defensible information for decision-making.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 95<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              Which role should provide independent assurance over the effectiveness of risk management processes?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Risk owner<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. System administrator<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. Process operator<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Internal audit<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Internal audit can provide independent assurance over the effectiveness of risk management, governance, and control processes. Independence allows auditors to evaluate whether established processes are designed and operating effectively without directly owning the risks being assessed. Risk owners and process operators are responsible for managing and operating controls, while system administrators may implement technical measures. These roles are important but generally do not provide the same level of independent assurance. Internal audit should not assume responsibility for managing operational risks because doing so could compromise its independence. Its role is to assess and report on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and controls according to applicable organizational requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 96<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Which factor should be considered when deciding whether to mitigate or transfer a risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. The age of the risk report<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. The visual design of the dashboard<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Cost, effectiveness, contractual conditions, and residual exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. The number of employees in the security department<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  The decision to mitigate or transfer a risk should consider cost, effectiveness, contractual conditions, and the resulting residual exposure. Management should determine whether implementing additional controls provides sufficient risk reduction compared with alternatives such as insurance or contractual transfer. Transfer arrangements should also be reviewed carefully because contractual terms may not cover every consequence or responsibility. The objective is not simply to select the least expensive option but to choose a treatment that appropriately manages exposure while supporting business objectives. Employee counts, report age, and dashboard design are not primary factors. A documented comparison of treatment alternatives helps management make consistent and informed decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 97<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  What should be included in a risk treatment plan?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Only the name of the risk owner<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Actions, responsibilities, timelines, and expected outcomes<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Only the purchase price of security tools<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. A list of unrelated business activities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A risk treatment plan should clearly define the actions required to address the risk, responsible parties, timelines, resources, and expected outcomes. It should provide enough detail to allow management to monitor implementation and determine whether the treatment is producing the intended reduction in exposure. Merely listing the risk owner or the cost of security tools does not provide sufficient information for effective oversight. The plan should also identify dependencies, milestones, acceptance criteria, and monitoring requirements where appropriate. A well-structured treatment plan establishes accountability and provides a mechanism for tracking progress. This allows management to identify delays, ineffective measures, or changes in risk conditions requiring additional action.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 98<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    Which activity BEST supports continuous improvement of the risk management process?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Removing historical risk information<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Keeping the methodology unchanged regardless of results<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Using lessons learned from incidents, assessments, and treatment outcomes<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Performing assessments only when required by auditors<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Lessons learned from incidents, risk assessments, control testing, treatment outcomes, and management reviews can provide valuable information for improving the risk management process. Organizations can use these lessons to refine methodologies, update criteria, improve controls, adjust monitoring practices, and address recurring weaknesses. Keeping the methodology unchanged regardless of results prevents organizations from adapting to new conditions. Removing historical information eliminates valuable evidence, while relying only on auditor requirements can result in a reactive approach. Continuous improvement ensures that risk management remains relevant as business objectives, technologies, threats, regulations, and organizational conditions evolve. This supports a more mature and responsive enterprise risk management program.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 99<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which metric would BEST help determine whether overall risk exposure is improving over time?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Number of employees attending meetings<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Number of pages in risk reports<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Total number of security policies<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Trend in aggregated risk exposure against defined thresholds<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        The trend in aggregated risk exposure against defined thresholds can provide meaningful insight into whether overall risk exposure is improving over time. Tracking exposure across reporting periods helps management identify whether risk levels are increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. Comparing results with established thresholds provides additional context about whether exposure remains within acceptable boundaries. Meeting attendance, report length, and the number of security policies do not directly demonstrate changes in organizational risk. Metrics should be aligned with business objectives and risk criteria and should use reliable data. Trend analysis is particularly useful when combined with information about treatment activities, control effectiveness, and significant changes in the organization’s operating environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 100<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        What is the PRIMARY objective of enterprise risk reporting?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. To increase the number of security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. To replace risk management activities<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. To provide decision-makers with relevant information about risk exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. To document every technical event<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          The primary objective of enterprise risk reporting is to provide decision-makers with relevant, timely, and accurate information about organizational risk exposure. Effective reports help management understand significant risks, trends, treatment status, exceptions, and areas requiring decisions or resources. Reporting should be tailored to the needs of its audience and connected to business objectives and risk appetite. Recording every technical event may create unnecessary information without supporting meaningful decisions. Increasing controls is an outcome of some risk decisions, not the purpose of reporting. Risk reporting also does not replace risk management activities. Instead, it provides visibility that enables management to govern, prioritize, and respond to risks effectively.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 81 Which activity is MOST important when establishing risk context? Purchasing security software Increasing audit frequency Identifying business objectives and relevant stakeholders Replacing existing controls Correct Answer: 3 Explanation Establishing risk context requires understanding the organization’s business objectives, processes, stakeholders, and operating environment. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20053"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20054,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20053\/revisions\/20054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}