{"id":20067,"date":"2026-09-23T10:41:45","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:41:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20067"},"modified":"2026-09-23T10:41:45","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:41:45","slug":"isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-240","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part12-q221-240\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CRISC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part12 Q221-240"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 221<\/b><\/h3>\n

An organization wants to determine whether its risk management activities are aligned with business objectives. Which activity is MOST appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Reviewing business objectives against identified risks<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Increasing the number of risk assessments<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Replacing all existing security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Conducting employee satisfaction surveys<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Risk management should directly support organizational objectives. Reviewing business objectives against identified risks helps determine whether important threats and opportunities are being addressed in a way that supports business priorities. This approach also helps identify risks that may have been overlooked because they were considered only from a technical or operational perspective. Increasing assessments does not necessarily improve alignment, while replacing controls without understanding business requirements can create unnecessary costs. Employee satisfaction surveys may provide useful organizational information but do not directly establish whether risk management supports business objectives. CRISC professionals should therefore ensure that risk identification, analysis, response, and monitoring remain connected to organizational goals.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 222<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Which factor should be considered FIRST when determining the appropriate risk response?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Availability of security technologies<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Risk appetite and tolerance<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Number of employees affected<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Current cybersecurity spending<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Risk appetite and tolerance establish how much risk an organization is willing and able to accept. These parameters provide an important foundation for selecting an appropriate risk response. Once the level of acceptable risk is understood, management can determine whether a risk should be avoided, mitigated, transferred, or accepted. Technology availability may influence how mitigation is implemented but should not independently determine the response. The number of employees affected and current cybersecurity spending can be relevant considerations, but neither establishes the organization\u2019s willingness to accept risk. A CRISC professional should ensure that risk response decisions remain consistent with formally defined organizational risk parameters.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 223<\/b><\/h3>\n

      A risk owner discovers that a control is no longer effective because of a major change in a business process. What should occur NEXT?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Immediately terminate the business process<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Accept the risk without further analysis<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Reassess the risk and determine an appropriate response<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Remove the control from the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        A significant business process change can alter both the likelihood and impact of existing risks. Therefore, the risk should be reassessed to determine whether the current control environment remains adequate. The reassessment may identify the need to modify existing controls, introduce additional controls, transfer the risk, or formally accept the residual exposure. Terminating the business process may be unnecessary, while accepting the risk without analysis does not provide sufficient management oversight. Removing the control from the risk register would also reduce visibility without addressing the underlying exposure. CRISC professionals should ensure that risk assessments remain current when significant organizational or process changes occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 224<\/b><\/h3>\n

        Which metric BEST indicates whether risk treatment activities are reducing exposure over time?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Number of security policies<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Number of risk meetings<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Number of employees trained<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Reduction in residual risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          Residual risk represents the amount of risk remaining after controls and other treatment measures have been applied. A reduction in residual risk provides direct evidence that risk treatment activities are having the intended effect. Metrics such as the number of policies, meetings, or trained employees may demonstrate activity or implementation progress, but they do not necessarily show whether actual risk exposure has decreased. Effective risk monitoring should therefore focus on meaningful measures that connect control performance to business risk. By tracking residual risk over time, management can determine whether existing treatment strategies remain effective or require adjustment because of changing threats, vulnerabilities, business processes, or organizational priorities.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 225<\/b><\/h3>\n

          What is the PRIMARY purpose of a risk register?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. To provide a centralized record of identified and assessed risks<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. To replace internal audit procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. To document every organizational asset<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. To serve as a technical configuration database<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            A risk register provides a centralized mechanism for documenting and monitoring identified organizational risks. Depending on the organization, it may contain information such as risk descriptions, owners, likelihood, impact, risk ratings, treatment plans, response status, and review dates. This information supports consistent communication and helps management monitor whether risks are being addressed appropriately. A risk register does not replace internal audit activities, although auditors may use it as an input. It is also not intended to document every asset or maintain technical configuration information. Its primary purpose is to provide visibility into risks and their management throughout their lifecycle.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 226<\/b><\/h3>\n

            Which action BEST supports effective communication of risk to executive management?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Providing detailed technical logs<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Linking risk exposure to business objectives and potential impact<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Listing every security alert<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. Reporting only completed control activities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Executive management generally requires risk information that supports business decisions rather than extensive technical detail. Linking risk exposure to business objectives, financial consequences, operational disruption, regulatory requirements, or strategic priorities makes risk information more meaningful to decision makers. Detailed logs and security alerts may be useful for operational teams but can obscure the most important business implications when presented to executives without context. Reporting only completed control activities also does not demonstrate whether those activities are reducing exposure. CRISC professionals should communicate risk in business-oriented terms, emphasizing significance, potential consequences, current exposure, and management actions needed to keep risk within acceptable limits.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 227<\/b><\/h3>\n

              A risk treatment plan identifies several controls that require implementation. What should be established to monitor progress?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. A list of unrelated security incidents<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. A new organizational mission statement<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Responsible owners and measurable milestones<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. A replacement for the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Effective risk treatment requires accountability and measurable progress. Assigning responsible owners ensures that specific individuals or teams are accountable for implementing treatment activities. Measurable milestones provide a way to determine whether implementation is progressing according to schedule and whether expected outcomes are being achieved. Without ownership and measurable milestones, treatment plans can remain theoretical and may not receive appropriate attention. Security incidents may provide useful operational information but do not establish treatment accountability. A new mission statement is unrelated to implementation tracking, and replacing the risk register would remove an important source of risk visibility. Monitoring should therefore connect treatment actions, owners, deadlines, and expected outcomes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 228<\/b><\/h3>\n

                What is the MOST important consideration when determining whether to accept residual risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Whether the risk is technically interesting<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Whether the risk owner has sufficient authority to accept it<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Whether another organization has experienced the same risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Whether the control implementation was expensive<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Risk acceptance should be an informed management decision based on the organization\u2019s risk appetite, tolerance, and business circumstances. The person accepting residual risk should have appropriate authority and accountability for that decision. While control cost, industry experience, and technical characteristics may contribute to the decision, they do not independently determine whether acceptance is appropriate. An organization may reasonably accept a risk when the remaining exposure falls within approved tolerance and further treatment would not provide sufficient value. Conversely, an expensive control does not justify accepting unacceptable exposure. CRISC professionals should ensure that risk acceptance is formally authorized, documented, and consistent with organizational governance requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 229<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  Which situation BEST demonstrates risk monitoring?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Reviewing risk indicators regularly and investigating significant changes<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Performing a risk assessment only once<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. Creating policies without reviewing effectiveness<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Purchasing additional security tools every year<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Risk monitoring involves continuously or periodically observing risk indicators and determining whether changes require management attention. Regular review of key risk indicators can reveal changes in threat levels, vulnerabilities, business processes, control performance, or external conditions. When significant changes occur, the organization can reassess the affected risks and modify treatment strategies. Performing a risk assessment only once does not account for changes over time. Creating policies without evaluating effectiveness provides limited assurance, while purchasing security tools does not necessarily improve risk management. Effective monitoring therefore combines defined indicators, appropriate review frequency, responsible personnel, and escalation procedures for significant changes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 230<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    Which factor is MOST useful when prioritizing risks for treatment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Age of the risk record<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Number of controls currently deployed<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Risk exposure compared with organizational tolerance<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Number of pages in the risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Risk prioritization should focus on the organization\u2019s exposure and the degree to which that exposure exceeds established risk tolerance. Risks that could significantly affect critical business objectives and exceed acceptable levels generally require greater management attention. The age of a risk record does not necessarily indicate its importance, and the number of controls does not automatically demonstrate that the remaining exposure is low. The length of a risk assessment has no meaningful relationship to risk priority. By comparing assessed risk against defined tolerance and considering business impact, management can allocate resources toward risks requiring timely treatment while maintaining appropriate oversight of risks that remain within acceptable boundaries.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 231<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Why should risk owners periodically review accepted risks?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Accepted risks can never change<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Risk conditions and business circumstances may change<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Accepted risks automatically become transferred<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Reviews eliminate the need for controls<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Risk acceptance is not necessarily a permanent decision. Threats, vulnerabilities, business processes, regulatory requirements, technology, and organizational priorities can change over time. A risk that was previously within tolerance may later exceed acceptable levels. Periodic review allows the risk owner to determine whether the original acceptance remains appropriate or whether additional treatment is required. Accepted risks should therefore remain visible and subject to appropriate monitoring. Acceptance does not mean that the risk disappears or becomes transferred to another party. Similarly, reviewing an accepted risk does not eliminate the need for controls. Continuous oversight ensures that management decisions remain aligned with the organization\u2019s current risk environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 232<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        Which control characteristic is MOST important when evaluating whether a control is operating effectively?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. The control has a modern name<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. The control is documented in a long policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. The control is expensive to operate<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. The control consistently produces the intended risk reduction<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A control is effective when it operates as intended and contributes to reducing the associated risk to an acceptable level. Documentation, cost, and terminology can provide useful context but do not by themselves demonstrate effectiveness. A control may be extensively documented yet fail in practice, while a relatively simple control may provide substantial risk reduction when properly designed and operated. Evaluation should therefore consider whether the control addresses the relevant risk, operates consistently, and produces the expected outcome. CRISC professionals should also consider evidence from testing, monitoring, incidents, and performance measurements when assessing control effectiveness and determining whether additional treatment is necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 233<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          A new regulation introduces additional requirements for an organization. What should the risk management team do FIRST?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Identify and assess risks arising from the regulatory change<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Immediately replace all existing controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Ignore the regulation until an audit occurs<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Delete outdated risks from the register<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            A regulatory change can introduce new obligations, compliance risks, penalties, operational requirements, or changes to existing risk exposure. The organization should first understand the requirements and identify the risks associated with failing to meet them. Those risks can then be assessed and mapped to existing controls and treatment plans. Immediately replacing all controls may create unnecessary cost and disruption because some existing controls may already address the new requirements. Ignoring the regulation creates unnecessary exposure, while deleting risks does not address the underlying issue. A structured assessment allows management to identify gaps, determine appropriate responses, assign ownership, and establish monitoring activities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 234<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            Which approach BEST helps determine whether a risk response remains appropriate after a major technology change?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Compare the new technology only with competitors<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Review the changed threat, vulnerability, impact, and control environment<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Remove the technology from the risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Assume that newer technology automatically reduces risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Technology changes can affect threats, vulnerabilities, business dependencies, control effectiveness, and potential impacts. Reviewing these factors provides a comprehensive basis for determining whether the existing risk response remains appropriate. A newer technology does not automatically eliminate risk; it may introduce new vulnerabilities or dependencies while reducing others. Comparing technologies solely with competitors does not establish the organization\u2019s actual exposure. Removing the technology from the risk assessment would create a significant visibility gap. CRISC professionals should reassess the risk environment following significant technology changes and determine whether controls, risk ratings, ownership, treatment plans, and monitoring requirements need to be updated.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 235<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              What is the PRIMARY benefit of using key risk indicators (KRIs)?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. They replace all security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. They guarantee that incidents will not occur<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. They provide signals about changes in risk exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. They eliminate the need for management decisions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Key risk indicators provide measurable signals that can help an organization identify changes in risk exposure before or as they become significant. KRIs may track conditions such as the number of critical vulnerabilities, failed control activities, third-party issues, or other factors relevant to organizational risk. They do not guarantee that incidents will not occur, replace security controls, or eliminate management decisions. Instead, they support informed decision-making by providing information about trends and changes in risk conditions. Effective KRIs should be relevant to organizational objectives, measurable, monitored at an appropriate frequency, and associated with thresholds that trigger investigation or escalation when necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 236<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                When a risk exceeds the organization\u2019s established tolerance, what should generally occur?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. The risk should be escalated for appropriate management action<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. The risk should automatically be deleted<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. The risk should always be accepted<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. The risk should be hidden from executive reports<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  When risk exposure exceeds approved tolerance, management attention is generally required. Escalation allows the appropriate authority to evaluate the situation and determine whether additional controls, risk transfer, avoidance, process changes, or other treatment actions are necessary. The exact response depends on organizational governance and the characteristics of the risk. Automatically deleting or accepting the risk would not address the excessive exposure. Hiding the risk from executive reporting would reduce transparency and could prevent timely decision-making. CRISC professionals should ensure that escalation procedures are clearly defined so that risks exceeding thresholds reach the appropriate decision makers promptly and are tracked until an appropriate response is established.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 237<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  Which activity BEST supports continuous improvement of the risk management process?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Avoiding all changes to existing procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Reviewing lessons learned and updating risk practices<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Reducing risk documentation<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Performing assessments only after incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Continuous improvement requires organizations to learn from experience and use that information to strengthen risk management practices. Lessons learned from incidents, assessments, control failures, audits, business changes, and risk events can identify weaknesses in existing processes. Updating procedures, methodologies, metrics, responsibilities, and treatment approaches based on these lessons can improve future risk decisions. Avoiding changes prevents the organization from adapting to evolving conditions. Reducing documentation may remove important evidence and accountability, while waiting until incidents occur creates a reactive rather than proactive approach. CRISC professionals should encourage structured feedback mechanisms so that risk management processes evolve as organizational needs and external conditions change.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 238<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    What should a risk owner do when a mitigation control reduces risk but does not bring it within tolerance?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Close the risk because a control exists<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Document the control and ignore the remaining exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Reassess the residual risk and determine additional treatment<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Remove the risk owner from the process<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A mitigation control can reduce risk without completely eliminating it. If the remaining residual risk is still above the organization\u2019s approved tolerance, the risk owner should reassess the exposure and determine whether additional treatment is necessary. Possible actions may include strengthening controls, implementing additional safeguards, transferring part of the risk, changing the process, or seeking an appropriately authorized risk acceptance decision. Simply closing the risk because a control exists does not demonstrate that the exposure is acceptable. Ignoring residual exposure can leave the organization outside its approved tolerance. CRISC professionals should ensure that treatment decisions are based on actual residual risk rather than the mere existence of controls.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 239<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which information is MOST useful for determining whether risk treatment has achieved its intended objective?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Evidence that the treatment reduced the targeted risk exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Number of meetings held by the risk team<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Number of pages in the treatment plan<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Number of employees who viewed the policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        The effectiveness of risk treatment should ultimately be evaluated by determining whether the targeted risk exposure has been reduced to an acceptable level or otherwise managed according to the approved response. Evidence may include changes in risk indicators, control test results, incident frequency, vulnerability levels, or residual risk measurements. Administrative activity such as meetings, document length, or policy views may demonstrate engagement but does not necessarily prove risk reduction. CRISC professionals should therefore establish measurable objectives for treatment activities and monitor whether those objectives are achieved. This approach helps management determine whether treatment should continue, be modified, or be replaced with another response.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 240<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        Which practice BEST ensures that risk management remains aligned with changing business priorities?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Keeping risk assessments unchanged for several years<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. Reviewing risk priorities when business objectives or conditions change<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Focusing exclusively on technical vulnerabilities<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. Allowing only the IT department to determine risk priorities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Business priorities can change because of new strategies, acquisitions, market conditions, regulations, technologies, products, or operational requirements. Risk management should adapt accordingly by reviewing risk priorities whenever significant business objectives or conditions change. This ensures that resources remain focused on risks that could affect current organizational goals. Keeping assessments unchanged can cause important risks to be overlooked, while focusing exclusively on technical vulnerabilities may ignore strategic, operational, financial, and compliance risks. Risk priorities should also involve appropriate business stakeholders rather than being determined solely by IT. CRISC professionals help maintain this alignment by connecting risk assessments, treatment decisions, and monitoring activities with current business objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 221 An organization wants to determine whether its risk management activities are aligned with business objectives. Which activity is MOST appropriate? Reviewing business objectives against identified risks Increasing the number of risk assessments Replacing all existing security controls Conducting employee satisfaction surveys Correct […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20067"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20067"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20067\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20068,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20067\/revisions\/20068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}