{"id":20069,"date":"2026-09-23T10:42:02","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:42:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20069"},"modified":"2026-09-23T10:42:02","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:42:02","slug":"isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part13-q241-260","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part13-q241-260\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CRISC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part13 Q241-260"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 241<\/b><\/h3>\n

Which activity is MOST important when establishing a risk management framework?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Defining roles, responsibilities, and accountability<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Purchasing security software<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Increasing the number of technical controls<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Eliminating all residual risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    A risk management framework requires clearly defined roles, responsibilities, and accountability so that risk-related decisions are consistently managed. Individuals and committees should understand who identifies risks, who assesses them, who owns them, who approves treatment decisions, and who monitors ongoing exposure. Without clear accountability, risk activities can become fragmented and important decisions may be delayed. Security software and technical controls may support risk treatment, but they do not establish governance. Similarly, eliminating all residual risk is generally impractical and is not the purpose of a framework. A strong framework connects governance, risk processes, business objectives, responsibilities, and monitoring requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 242<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Which factor should MOST influence the frequency of risk assessments?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Number of employees in the organization<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Changes in the risk environment and business conditions<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Age of the organization’s security tools<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Number of meetings held by management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Risk assessments should be performed at a frequency appropriate to the organization\u2019s changing risk environment. Significant changes in business processes, technology, regulations, threats, vulnerabilities, suppliers, or organizational strategy may require an assessment sooner than a routine schedule. The number of employees or management meetings does not directly determine risk assessment frequency. Similarly, the age of security tools is only one possible factor and does not provide a complete view of changing exposure. A risk-based approach ensures assessments occur when meaningful changes could affect risk. CRISC professionals should therefore establish criteria and triggers that determine when reassessment is required.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 243<\/b><\/h3>\n

      An organization identifies a critical risk that could significantly disrupt a key business service. What should be done FIRST?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Archive the risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Purchase additional security products<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Confirm the risk, impact, ownership, and current exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Transfer the risk immediately<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        Before selecting a risk response, management needs a clear understanding of the risk and its potential effect on the business. Confirming the risk description, business impact, ownership, likelihood, current controls, and residual exposure provides the foundation for an informed response. Purchasing products or transferring the risk immediately may result in unnecessary or inappropriate actions if the exposure has not been adequately understood. Archiving the assessment would provide no useful response. CRISC professionals should ensure that critical risks are accurately characterized and communicated to the appropriate decision makers before treatment decisions are made. This supports proportional, business-aligned risk management.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 244<\/b><\/h3>\n

        What is the PRIMARY purpose of risk criteria?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. To define how risks will be evaluated and prioritized<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. To identify every employee responsible for security<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. To replace business objectives<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. To eliminate the need for risk monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          Risk criteria establish the basis used to evaluate and prioritize risks consistently. They can include factors such as likelihood, impact, risk appetite, risk tolerance, regulatory considerations, financial consequences, and effects on critical business objectives. Clearly defined criteria help different teams assess risks using a common approach and make risk decisions more consistent. Risk criteria do not replace business objectives or eliminate the need for monitoring. They also do not simply identify every employee involved in security. CRISC professionals should help ensure that risk criteria are approved, understood, documented, and periodically reviewed so they remain appropriate for the organization\u2019s current environment and objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 245<\/b><\/h3>\n

          Which approach BEST supports identification of emerging risks?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Reviewing only historical incidents<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Monitoring changes in threats, technology, regulations, and business strategy<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Waiting for internal audit findings<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. Reviewing risks only after a major incident<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            Emerging risks may develop before they appear in historical incident records. Monitoring changes in threats, technology, regulations, market conditions, suppliers, and business strategy can help identify new risk conditions earlier. Historical incidents remain useful but provide only a backward-looking perspective. Waiting for audits or major incidents can delay recognition and response. Effective risk management combines internal and external information sources and establishes processes for identifying significant changes. CRISC professionals should encourage organizations to monitor relevant environmental factors and evaluate whether changes could create new risks or alter existing ones. Early identification allows management more time to assess options and prepare appropriate responses.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 246<\/b><\/h3>\n

            Which statement BEST describes risk appetite?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. The maximum number of risks an organization can record<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. The total cost of all security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. The amount and type of risk an organization is willing to pursue or retain<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. The number of risks transferred to third parties<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Risk appetite represents the amount and type of risk an organization is willing to pursue, retain, or accept in order to achieve its objectives. It provides important direction for strategic and operational decision-making. Risk appetite is broader than a simple count of risks or security spending. It also differs from risk tolerance, which generally establishes more specific acceptable variations or thresholds around particular objectives or risk categories. Understanding risk appetite helps management determine whether identified exposures are consistent with organizational expectations. CRISC professionals should ensure that risk appetite is communicated effectively and incorporated into risk assessment, response, monitoring, and reporting activities.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 247<\/b><\/h3>\n

              A risk owner wants to transfer a risk to a third party. Which consideration is MOST important?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Whether the transfer actually changes the organization’s risk exposure and responsibilities<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. Whether the vendor has the largest market share<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Whether the contract is the longest available<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. Whether the vendor uses newer software<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Risk transfer does not necessarily eliminate an organization\u2019s responsibility or exposure. Before transferring risk, management should determine what portion of the risk is actually transferred, what remains with the organization, and whether the third party has appropriate capabilities and contractual obligations. Insurance, outsourcing, and contractual arrangements may shift financial or operational consequences, but accountability and regulatory responsibilities may still remain with the organization. Vendor size, contract length, or software age does not independently demonstrate effective risk transfer. CRISC professionals should evaluate contractual terms, service capabilities, residual risk, monitoring requirements, and legal or regulatory obligations before concluding that a risk has been appropriately transferred.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 248<\/b><\/h3>\n

                Which activity provides the BEST evidence that a control is functioning as intended?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Reviewing the control’s name<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Confirming that the control is included in a policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Checking whether the control was purchased<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Testing the control and evaluating the results<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Control testing provides direct evidence about whether a control is designed and operating as intended. Testing can reveal failures, inconsistencies, gaps, or circumstances in which the control does not adequately address the associated risk. A policy reference demonstrates documentation but not necessarily implementation. Purchasing a security solution does not prove that it is correctly configured or effective, and a control name provides no evidence of performance. CRISC professionals should consider appropriate testing methods, evidence quality, frequency, and results when evaluating controls. Findings should be communicated to relevant stakeholders and used to determine whether corrective actions or changes to risk treatment are necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 249<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  What is the MAIN purpose of risk aggregation?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. To remove low-level risks from consideration<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. To understand the combined effect of multiple risks<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. To replace individual risk ownership<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. To reduce the number of risk assessments<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Risk aggregation helps management understand how multiple individual risks may combine to create a larger or different overall exposure. Several risks that appear manageable independently can have interconnected effects that become significant when considered together. Aggregation can therefore provide a broader view of organizational exposure and support resource allocation and strategic decision-making. It does not mean that low-level risks should automatically be removed or that individual ownership should be eliminated. Nor is its primary purpose simply reducing the number of assessments. CRISC professionals should consider dependencies, common causes, shared assets, and cumulative impacts when determining whether risks should be evaluated collectively.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 250<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    Which action BEST demonstrates effective risk governance?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Making risk decisions without documented accountability<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Allowing individual employees to accept any level of risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Establishing oversight, authority, accountability, and reporting mechanisms<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Delegating all risk decisions to external vendors<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Effective risk governance establishes how risk decisions are directed, authorized, monitored, and reported. Governance should define appropriate authority levels, accountability, oversight structures, escalation mechanisms, and reporting requirements. This ensures that significant risk decisions receive appropriate management attention and remain aligned with organizational objectives. Allowing individuals to accept unlimited risk creates inconsistent and potentially unacceptable exposure. External vendors may support risk activities but should not automatically control organizational risk decisions. Undocumented decisions also reduce accountability and transparency. CRISC professionals should help establish governance mechanisms that enable management to understand risk exposure and make decisions within approved risk appetite and tolerance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 251<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Which situation is MOST likely to require a reassessment of an existing risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. A routine staff meeting is completed<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. A significant business process is outsourced<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. A standard report is generated<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. A previously scheduled training session occurs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Outsourcing a significant business process can materially change an organization\u2019s risk environment. New third-party dependencies, contractual obligations, data exposure, service availability concerns, compliance requirements, and concentration risks may arise. These changes can affect likelihood, impact, control effectiveness, and risk ownership. Therefore, the existing risk should be reassessed to determine whether the current response remains appropriate. Routine meetings, report generation, and scheduled training may be normal activities that do not necessarily change risk exposure. CRISC professionals should identify significant business and environmental changes that could alter existing risks and ensure that reassessments occur when appropriate rather than relying solely on fixed review schedules.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 252<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        Which measure would BEST help management determine whether risk awareness is improving?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Number of security products purchased<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. Number of risk documents stored<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. Percentage of relevant personnel demonstrating required risk knowledge<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. Number of risk owners assigned<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Risk awareness is concerned with whether personnel understand their responsibilities and recognize how their actions affect organizational risk. Measuring the percentage of relevant personnel who demonstrate required risk knowledge can provide meaningful evidence of awareness improvement. Simply counting security products or documents does not establish whether employees understand risk concepts. Assigning risk owners is important for accountability but does not measure overall awareness. Organizations can use assessments, training evaluations, simulations, or knowledge checks to measure understanding. CRISC professionals should ensure that awareness measures are connected to desired behaviors and risk objectives rather than relying solely on activity-based metrics such as training attendance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 253<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          Which factor should be considered when defining risk escalation thresholds?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Organizational risk appetite and tolerance<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. The number of pages in the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. The physical location of the risk team<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. The age of the organization’s website<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Risk escalation thresholds should reflect the level of exposure that requires additional management attention. Organizational risk appetite and tolerance provide an important basis for establishing these thresholds. When risk indicators exceed approved limits, the issue can be escalated to the appropriate authority for review and action. The size of the risk register, location of the risk team, or age of a website does not determine whether escalation is appropriate. Thresholds should be measurable, clearly defined, and linked to appropriate escalation responsibilities. CRISC professionals should help ensure that thresholds are reviewed periodically so they remain consistent with business objectives and changes in the organization’s risk environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 254<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            What is the PRIMARY objective of a risk assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. To purchase new security technology<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. To identify and analyze risks that could affect organizational objectives<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. To eliminate the need for business continuity<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. To document every employee’s daily activities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A risk assessment identifies and analyzes risks that could affect organizational objectives. It typically considers threats, vulnerabilities, likelihood, impact, existing controls, and resulting risk exposure. The results support management decisions regarding risk treatment and resource allocation. A risk assessment is not primarily a technology purchasing exercise, nor does it eliminate the need for business continuity planning. Documenting employee activities is also outside its primary purpose. CRISC professionals should ensure that assessments are performed using consistent criteria and that their results are communicated to appropriate decision makers. Assessments should provide useful information for prioritizing risks and selecting responses that support business objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 255<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              Which action should occur when a risk treatment activity is completed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Delete the original risk automatically<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Stop monitoring the risk permanently<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. Reassess the resulting residual risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Remove the risk owner<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Completing a risk treatment activity does not automatically mean that the risk has been eliminated. The organization should reassess the resulting residual risk to determine whether the treatment achieved its intended effect and whether the remaining exposure falls within approved tolerance. Depending on the outcome, additional treatment or formal acceptance may be required. Automatically deleting the risk would remove visibility without confirming its status. Monitoring may still be necessary because risk conditions can change over time, and removing the risk owner would weaken accountability. CRISC professionals should ensure that treatment completion is followed by appropriate validation, reassessment, documentation, and ongoing monitoring.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 256<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Which approach BEST supports objective risk reporting?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Using consistent criteria, metrics, and evidence<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Reporting only favorable results<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Excluding risks that lack technical controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Changing risk ratings without documented justification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Objective risk reporting depends on consistent assessment criteria, reliable metrics, and supporting evidence. Standardized methods help ensure that risks are evaluated and communicated consistently across business units. Evidence provides support for reported risk levels and control performance. Reporting only favorable results can create an incomplete picture, while excluding risks simply because technical controls are unavailable ignores important business exposure. Changing risk ratings without justification undermines transparency and comparability. CRISC professionals should promote reporting practices that clearly distinguish facts, assumptions, trends, and management decisions. Consistent reporting enables executives and other stakeholders to understand current exposure and make informed risk management decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 257<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  A risk indicator reaches its predefined warning threshold. What should the risk owner generally do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Ignore it until an incident occurs<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Investigate the change and determine whether escalation is required<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Delete the indicator<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Automatically accept the associated risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    A warning threshold is intended to prompt attention before risk exposure becomes unacceptable or results in an incident. When a key risk indicator reaches such a threshold, the risk owner should investigate the underlying cause, determine whether exposure has changed, and evaluate whether escalation or additional treatment is necessary. Ignoring the indicator defeats its purpose. Deleting the indicator removes an important monitoring mechanism, while automatically accepting the risk may be inappropriate if exposure is approaching or exceeding tolerance. CRISC professionals should establish clear procedures for responding to thresholds, including investigation, documentation, communication, and escalation requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 258<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    Which statement BEST describes residual risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Risk that exists only before controls are implemented<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Risk transferred entirely to another organization<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Risk remaining after risk responses and controls are applied<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Risk that has never been identified<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Residual risk is the exposure that remains after controls and other risk treatment measures have been applied. No control environment can usually eliminate every possible risk, so management must determine whether the remaining exposure is acceptable. Residual risk differs from inherent risk, which represents exposure before considering controls or treatments. Transferring a risk may reduce or redistribute certain consequences but does not necessarily eliminate residual exposure. Risk that has never been identified is an unknown or unidentified risk rather than residual risk. CRISC professionals should ensure that residual risk is measured or evaluated appropriately and compared with organizational risk appetite and tolerance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 259<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Why should risk management processes include documented escalation procedures?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. To ensure significant risks reach the appropriate decision makers<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. To eliminate all management involvement<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. To prevent risk owners from monitoring risks<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. To replace risk assessment criteria<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Documented escalation procedures help ensure that significant risks are communicated to the appropriate decision makers in a timely and consistent manner. They should define conditions that trigger escalation, responsible parties, reporting channels, and expected response times. Without defined procedures, important risks may remain at an operational level even when they require executive attention. Escalation does not eliminate management involvement or prevent risk owners from monitoring risks. It also does not replace risk assessment criteria. Instead, escalation procedures work together with risk criteria, thresholds, governance structures, and reporting processes to ensure that risk exposure receives the level of attention appropriate to its significance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 260<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        Which practice BEST helps ensure that risk treatment remains cost-effective?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Implementing every available control<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. Selecting controls based only on vendor recommendations<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Comparing treatment costs with expected risk reduction and business value<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. Choosing the most expensive control available<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Cost-effective risk treatment considers whether the resources required for a treatment are justified by the expected reduction in risk and the value provided to the organization. Management should consider implementation and operating costs, potential losses avoided, regulatory requirements, business objectives, and residual exposure. Implementing every possible control can create unnecessary expense and operational complexity. Vendor recommendations may be useful but should not replace an organization-specific risk analysis. The most expensive control is not necessarily the most effective. CRISC professionals should help management evaluate treatment alternatives using risk-based and business-focused criteria so resources are directed toward measures that provide appropriate risk reduction and support organizational objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 241 Which activity is MOST important when establishing a risk management framework? Defining roles, responsibilities, and accountability Purchasing security software Increasing the number of technical controls Eliminating all residual risk Correct Answer: 1 Explanation A risk management framework requires clearly defined roles, responsibilities, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20069"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20069"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20070,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20069\/revisions\/20070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}