{"id":20081,"date":"2026-09-23T10:43:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:43:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20081"},"modified":"2026-09-23T10:43:41","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T10:43:41","slug":"isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-crisc-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CRISC Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part19 Q361-380"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 361<\/b><\/h3>\n

Which activity BEST helps ensure that risk treatment remains effective after implementation?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Removing the risk from the register<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Monitoring control performance and residual risk<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Stopping all risk assessments<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Reviewing only the original risk statement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Risk treatment should be monitored after implementation to determine whether controls continue to operate effectively and whether residual risk remains within approved limits. Changes in business processes, threats, technology, regulations, or control performance can alter exposure over time. Removing the risk from the register would reduce visibility, while stopping assessments prevents the organization from identifying changing conditions. Reviewing only the original risk statement is insufficient because the environment may have changed. CRISC professionals should establish monitoring activities, indicators, thresholds, and review procedures that provide timely information about treatment effectiveness and allow management to take corrective action when exposure becomes unacceptable.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 362<\/b><\/h3>\n

    What is the PRIMARY purpose of defining risk criteria before conducting an assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. To ensure risks are evaluated consistently<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. To guarantee that all risks receive the same treatment<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. To eliminate management involvement<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. To reduce the number of identified risks<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Risk criteria provide a consistent basis for evaluating and comparing risks. They may define likelihood scales, impact categories, risk levels, tolerance thresholds, and other factors used during assessment. Establishing these criteria before assessment helps reduce subjectivity and ensures that different risks are evaluated using a common methodology. It does not mean every risk receives the same treatment because responses should reflect individual circumstances and organizational priorities. Risk criteria also do not eliminate management involvement. CRISC professionals should ensure that criteria are aligned with organizational objectives, risk appetite, regulatory requirements, and governance expectations so that assessment results can support meaningful decision-making.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 363<\/b><\/h3>\n

      Which situation BEST demonstrates effective risk ownership?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. A risk owner regularly reviews exposure and ensures treatment actions are completed<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. A risk is listed without an assigned owner<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Multiple employees assume someone else is responsible<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. The risk owner never receives monitoring information<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        Effective risk ownership involves accountability for understanding the risk, monitoring its status, coordinating treatment, and escalating issues when necessary. A risk owner should have sufficient authority, resources, and access to relevant information to perform these responsibilities. An unassigned risk lacks clear accountability, while situations where multiple employees assume someone else is responsible can result in inaction. A risk owner who does not receive monitoring information cannot effectively manage changing exposure. CRISC professionals should help organizations establish clear ownership structures and ensure that owners understand their responsibilities. Ownership should remain visible throughout the risk lifecycle and should be reassessed when organizational responsibilities change.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 364<\/b><\/h3>\n

        Which factor is MOST important when evaluating the effectiveness of a risk response?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Whether the response reduced risk to an acceptable level<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Whether the response produced extensive documentation<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Whether the response used new technology<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Whether the response required multiple meetings<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          The effectiveness of a risk response should primarily be evaluated by determining whether it achieved the intended risk outcome. If the response reduced residual risk to a level within approved tolerance, it is contributing to the organization’s risk objectives. Documentation, technology, and meetings may support implementation but do not independently demonstrate effectiveness. CRISC professionals should establish measurable objectives for risk responses and compare actual results against those objectives. If exposure remains above tolerance, management should investigate the reasons and consider modifying the response. This outcome-focused approach helps ensure that resources are directed toward treatments that meaningfully manage organizational risk.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 365<\/b><\/h3>\n

          Which action is MOST appropriate when a risk assessment contains outdated information?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Use the outdated assessment until the next annual review<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Update the assessment using current and reliable information<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Delete the assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. Lower all risk ratings<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            Outdated risk information can result in inappropriate decisions because the assessment may no longer reflect current threats, vulnerabilities, controls, business conditions, or impacts. The assessment should therefore be updated using current and reliable information. Waiting for an annual review may leave significant exposure unmanaged if the information has already become materially outdated. Deleting the assessment removes historical context without addressing the underlying risk, while lowering ratings without evidence compromises risk reporting. CRISC professionals should establish processes for identifying outdated information and triggering reassessment when significant changes occur. Accurate and timely risk information is essential for effective governance and risk-based decision-making.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 366<\/b><\/h3>\n

            Which practice BEST supports accountability for risk treatment actions?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Assigning each action to a responsible individual with a defined deadline<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Allowing all employees to share responsibility equally<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Recording only the treatment objective<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. Leaving deadlines unspecified<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Clear assignment of responsibility and deadlines makes risk treatment actions measurable and accountable. Each action should have an identified owner, expected completion date, required resources, and appropriate status tracking. Assigning responsibility broadly to everyone can create ambiguity because no individual is clearly accountable. Recording only the objective provides insufficient information to monitor progress, while unspecified deadlines make it difficult to determine whether treatment is proceeding as planned. CRISC professionals should encourage structured treatment plans that identify responsibilities, milestones, dependencies, and escalation criteria. This enables management to monitor progress and intervene when actions are delayed or exposure remains above acceptable levels.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 367<\/b><\/h3>\n

              Which event should MOST likely cause an organization to revisit its risk appetite?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. A significant change in strategic direction<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. A routine password reset<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. A minor office repair<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. A standard employee meeting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Risk appetite represents the amount and type of risk an organization is willing to pursue or retain in support of its objectives. A significant change in strategic direction can change the organization’s priorities, operating model, investment strategy, or exposure to uncertainty. Therefore, management may need to review whether the existing risk appetite remains appropriate. Routine administrative activities generally do not justify such a review. CRISC professionals should help ensure that risk appetite is communicated, understood, and periodically reassessed when significant strategic or environmental changes occur. Risk appetite should provide meaningful direction for risk decisions and should remain aligned with current organizational objectives.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 368<\/b><\/h3>\n

                Which information should be included in a risk register to support effective management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Risk description, owner, assessment, treatment, and status<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Only the name of the risk owner<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Only historical incidents<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Only technical vulnerabilities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A risk register should contain information that enables stakeholders to understand, manage, and monitor identified risks. Relevant information commonly includes the risk description, affected objectives or assets, owner, likelihood, impact, risk rating, treatment strategy, status, indicators, and important review information. The exact fields depend on organizational requirements and methodology. Recording only the owner or historical incidents does not provide sufficient information for management. Technical vulnerabilities may be important inputs but do not represent the complete business risk. CRISC professionals should help maintain risk registers that are accurate, current, appropriately protected, and useful for monitoring and decision-making.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 369<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  Which approach BEST helps determine whether a risk should be transferred?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Evaluating whether another party can appropriately assume the financial or operational consequences<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Transferring every high risk automatically<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. Selecting transfer because it has no cost<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Avoiding contractual review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Risk transfer involves shifting some consequences or responsibilities to another party through mechanisms such as insurance, contracts, outsourcing, or service agreements. Before choosing transfer, management should determine whether the other party can appropriately assume the relevant exposure and whether the arrangement actually reduces organizational risk. Transfer does not eliminate all accountability or necessarily remove the underlying risk. Automatically transferring every high risk can create additional third-party exposure. CRISC professionals should consider contractual terms, coverage limitations, service levels, provider capability, residual responsibility, regulatory obligations, and costs. The organization should evaluate whether transfer provides meaningful risk reduction compared with other treatment options.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 370<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    Which factor should be considered when determining whether risk acceptance is temporary or ongoing?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. The expected duration and conditions of the accepted exposure<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. The number of employees in the organization<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. The age of the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. The format of the acceptance document<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Risk acceptance may be temporary when management agrees to tolerate exposure for a defined period while treatment is being implemented or another condition is resolved. The expected duration and conditions should therefore be documented clearly. Permanent or ongoing acceptance should also be reviewed periodically because changes in the business or risk environment may alter the appropriateness of the decision. Employee count, register age, and document format do not determine acceptance duration. CRISC professionals should ensure that acceptance decisions include appropriate authority, rationale, scope, review dates, and conditions. This helps prevent temporary acceptance from becoming indefinite without management awareness.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 371<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Which activity BEST helps validate information used in a risk assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Comparing information against reliable evidence and authoritative sources<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Accepting every stakeholder statement without review<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Using only information from previous years<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Removing conflicting information<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Risk assessments depend on the quality of the information used to identify and evaluate exposure. Validation should involve comparing important information with reliable evidence, authoritative sources, operational records, system data, audit results, threat intelligence, or other appropriate references. Stakeholder input is valuable but may need verification. Historical information can provide context but may not represent current conditions. Removing conflicting information without investigation can hide important issues. CRISC professionals should assess the reliability, relevance, timeliness, and completeness of risk information. Validated information improves confidence in risk ratings and supports more defensible treatment and management decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 372<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        What is the PRIMARY reason to document exceptions to established risk policies?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. To provide accountability and visibility into deviations<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. To eliminate the policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. To ensure every exception becomes permanent<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. To avoid management review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Policy exceptions represent deviations from established requirements and should therefore be documented to provide accountability, transparency, and management visibility. Documentation should generally include the reason for the exception, affected scope, responsible authority, duration, compensating measures, and review requirements. Exceptions should not automatically become permanent and should remain subject to appropriate approval and monitoring. Eliminating the underlying policy is not an appropriate response to individual exceptions. CRISC professionals should help ensure that exceptions are formally evaluated and authorized by appropriate personnel. A controlled exception process prevents informal deviations from becoming unmanaged risks and helps management understand where risk exposure differs from established expectations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 373<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          Which action BEST supports effective third-party risk monitoring?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Reviewing provider performance and risk indicators against contractual requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Relying solely on the provider’s marketing material<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Monitoring only after a service failure<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Eliminating all contractual requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Third-party risk should be monitored using measurable requirements and evidence of provider performance. Contractual service levels, security requirements, compliance obligations, risk indicators, audit results, incident reports, and performance metrics can help determine whether the provider continues to meet expectations. Marketing material does not provide sufficient evidence of operational performance, and waiting until a service failure occurs is reactive. Eliminating contractual requirements removes important accountability mechanisms. CRISC professionals should help establish ongoing monitoring based on the criticality of the service and the organization’s risk exposure. Significant deviations should be communicated to the appropriate risk owner and escalated when they exceed established thresholds.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 374<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            Which characteristic is MOST important for a useful risk indicator?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. It provides timely information about changes in risk conditions<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. It is difficult for stakeholders to understand<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. It always produces the same value<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. It measures only administrative activity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A useful risk indicator should provide meaningful information about changes in risk conditions and allow stakeholders to identify emerging problems before they become significant incidents. Timeliness is particularly important because delayed information may prevent management from taking effective action. Indicators should be relevant, measurable, understandable, and linked to defined thresholds or response procedures where appropriate. An indicator that never changes may provide little insight, while one that measures only administrative activity may not reflect actual exposure. CRISC professionals should select indicators that support organizational objectives and provide actionable information for monitoring, escalation, reassessment, and treatment decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 375<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              Which situation BEST demonstrates a control deficiency affecting risk treatment?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. A required control is documented but consistently fails during operation<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. A control has an assigned owner<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. A control has a documented procedure<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. A control is included in the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                A control that consistently fails during operation represents a deficiency because its actual effectiveness is not sufficient to achieve the intended risk reduction. Documentation, ownership, and inclusion in a risk register are important governance elements but do not prove that a control works effectively. CRISC professionals should distinguish between control design and operating effectiveness when evaluating treatment. If a control fails repeatedly, management should determine the underlying cause, assess the resulting residual risk, and consider remediation or alternative controls. Control deficiencies should be tracked and escalated appropriately when they cause exposure to exceed established risk tolerance or create significant business consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 376<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Which activity BEST supports risk aggregation at the enterprise level?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Combining related risk information using consistent criteria<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Keeping every business unit’s risks completely isolated<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Reporting only the highest-rated individual risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Removing duplicate-looking risks without analysis<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Enterprise risk aggregation requires consistent information and criteria so that related risks can be viewed collectively. Risks from different business units may interact or share dependencies, creating a combined exposure that is not obvious when each risk is considered separately. Keeping risks isolated can prevent management from recognizing these relationships. Reporting only the highest-rated individual risk may overlook cumulative exposure, while removing risks that appear similar without analysis could eliminate important information. CRISC professionals should help identify common risk factors, dependencies, concentrations, and relationships and present aggregated information in a way that supports enterprise-level decision-making and prioritization.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 377<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  What should be done when risk treatment costs significantly exceed the expected benefit?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Reevaluate alternative treatment options and residual risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Continue automatically because treatment was approved<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Ignore the cost<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Remove the risk from monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Risk treatment should provide reasonable value relative to the reduction in exposure it achieves. When treatment costs significantly exceed the expected benefit, management should reassess alternatives, consider the remaining exposure, and determine whether another treatment, transfer, acceptance, or process change may be more appropriate. Continuing automatically without evaluation can result in inefficient resource use. Ignoring costs prevents informed decision-making, while removing the risk from monitoring does not reduce exposure. CRISC professionals should provide management with information about treatment costs, expected risk reduction, business impact, and residual risk so that decisions can be made within the organization’s risk appetite and financial constraints.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 378<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    Which action BEST helps prevent risk treatment plans from becoming outdated?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Establishing review points and reassessment triggers<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Approving the plan once and never revisiting it<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Removing completed milestones<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Limiting reviews to external audits<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Risk treatment plans can become outdated when business conditions, threats, technology, regulations, resources, or dependencies change. Establishing scheduled review points and event-based reassessment triggers helps ensure that plans remain aligned with current conditions. Approving a plan once does not guarantee continued relevance, and removing completed milestones reduces the ability to track progress and history. External audits can provide valuable assurance but should not be the only mechanism for reviewing treatment plans. CRISC professionals should encourage continuous monitoring and periodic reassessment so that treatment activities can be adjusted when assumptions change or when results show that the planned response is no longer sufficient.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 379<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which factor should influence the level of detail used in risk reporting?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. The needs and decision-making responsibilities of the audience<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. The personal writing style of the analyst<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. The size of the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. The number of available report templates<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Risk reporting should be tailored to the audience because different stakeholders require different levels of detail to make decisions. Senior management may need concise information about business impact, trends, exposure, treatment status, and decisions required. Operational or technical teams may need more detailed information about controls, vulnerabilities, dependencies, and corrective actions. Using excessive detail for executives can obscure important issues, while insufficient detail for operational teams can prevent effective action. CRISC professionals should ensure that reports are accurate, relevant, timely, and understandable. The reporting format should support the responsibilities and decisions of the intended audience rather than simply reproduce the entire risk register.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 380<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        Which outcome BEST indicates that risk governance is functioning effectively?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Risk decisions are made by appropriate authorities using reliable risk information<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. All risks are eliminated<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Only technical teams make risk decisions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. Risk information is kept confidential from management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Effective risk governance ensures that appropriate authorities make risk decisions using reliable, timely, and relevant information. Governance establishes accountability, decision rights, escalation mechanisms, policies, and oversight so that risk remains aligned with organizational objectives. Eliminating all risks is unrealistic because uncertainty is inherent in business activities. Restricting decisions to technical teams may exclude important business considerations, while withholding risk information from management prevents informed decision-making. CRISC professionals should help ensure that governance structures clearly define responsibilities and that management receives sufficient information to evaluate exposure, approve treatments, accept appropriate risks, and respond when risk exceeds established appetite or tolerance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Isaca CRISC Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 361 Which activity BEST helps ensure that risk treatment remains effective after implementation? Removing the risk from the register Monitoring control performance and residual risk Stopping all risk assessments Reviewing only the original risk statement Correct Answer: 2 Explanation Risk treatment should be […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20081"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20081"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20081\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20082,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20081\/revisions\/20082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}