{"id":20447,"date":"2026-09-24T05:08:26","date_gmt":"2026-09-24T05:08:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=20447"},"modified":"2026-09-24T05:08:26","modified_gmt":"2026-09-24T05:08:26","slug":"pecb-lead-implementer-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/pecb-lead-implementer-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part19-q361-380\/","title":{"rendered":"PECB Lead Implementer Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part19 Q361-380"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>PECB Lead Implementer Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 361<\/b><\/h3>\n

What is the primary purpose of conducting an information security risk assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. To identify and evaluate risks that could affect information security objectives<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. To eliminate the need for security controls<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. To guarantee that no incidents will occur<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. To replace the organization’s business strategy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    An information security risk assessment helps an organization identify, analyze, and evaluate risks that could affect the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information and related assets. The assessment considers relevant threats, vulnerabilities, consequences, and likelihoods according to established criteria. Results provide a basis for determining whether risks are acceptable or require treatment. Risk assessments should be performed using a consistent methodology and reviewed when significant changes occur. They support informed decision-making about controls, resources, priorities, and risk acceptance. A well-managed assessment process ensures that security decisions are based on the organization’s actual risk environment rather than assumptions or isolated technical concerns.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 362<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Why should risk acceptance criteria be defined before evaluating risks?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. To prevent risks from being documented<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. To provide a consistent basis for deciding whether risks require treatment<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. To ensure every risk receives the same treatment<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. To eliminate management responsibility<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Risk acceptance criteria establish the basis for determining whether an identified risk can be accepted or requires additional treatment. Without defined criteria, different risks may be evaluated inconsistently, making decisions difficult to justify. Criteria may consider factors such as business impact, likelihood, legal obligations, financial consequences, information sensitivity, and organizational priorities. Management should establish appropriate acceptance thresholds before or as part of the risk evaluation process. Once risks are assessed, results can be compared against those criteria to determine appropriate actions. Clearly defined criteria support transparency, consistency, accountability, and informed decision-making throughout the organization’s risk management process.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 363<\/b><\/h3>\n

      What should a risk treatment plan normally identify?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Only the name of the risk<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. The organization’s annual revenue<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Treatment actions, responsibilities, resources, and relevant timelines<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Every possible future threat<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        A risk treatment plan provides a structured approach for addressing risks that require treatment. It should identify relevant treatment actions and, where appropriate, responsible parties, required resources, priorities, and target dates. Treatment may involve modifying, avoiding, sharing, or accepting a risk according to organizational criteria and circumstances. Selected controls should address the causes or consequences of the risk and should be implemented and monitored appropriately. Progress against treatment plans should be reviewed so delays or ineffective actions can be addressed. A clear treatment plan improves accountability and helps management determine whether identified risks are being reduced to acceptable levels.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 364<\/b><\/h3>\n

        What is residual risk?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Risk that remains after risk treatment has been implemented<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Risk that has never been identified<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Risk that automatically disappears after an audit<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Risk caused only by external suppliers<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          Residual risk is the level of risk that remains after selected risk treatment measures have been implemented. Security controls can reduce the likelihood or impact of risks, but they generally cannot eliminate every possible risk. Organizations should evaluate the remaining risk against established acceptance criteria. If the residual risk is acceptable, management may formally accept it according to the organization’s process. If it remains unacceptable, additional treatment may be required. Residual risk should also be reviewed when threats, vulnerabilities, business processes, technologies, or controls change. Understanding residual risk allows management to make informed decisions about the level of protection that remains after treatment.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 365<\/b><\/h3>\n

          What is the purpose of a Statement of Applicability in an ISO\/IEC 27001-based ISMS?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. To list all employees who work in IT<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. To document which applicable controls are selected or excluded and the justification<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. To replace the risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. To document only security incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            The Statement of Applicability provides a documented overview of the controls that the organization has determined to be applicable to its ISMS and the status or justification associated with them. It can also document why certain controls are excluded when justified. The Statement of Applicability connects risk treatment decisions with the organization’s selected controls and provides useful evidence for management and auditors. It should remain consistent with the organization’s risk assessment, treatment decisions, and applicable requirements. Changes to risks, business processes, technology, or requirements may require the Statement of Applicability to be reviewed and updated.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 366<\/b><\/h3>\n

            Which activity supports effective security governance?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Defining clear responsibilities and accountability for information security<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Allowing responsibilities to remain undocumented<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Giving all security decisions to one technical employee<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. Avoiding management participation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Effective security governance requires clear accountability and defined responsibilities across relevant organizational levels. Management should establish direction and ensure that appropriate resources and authority are available for information security activities. Operational responsibilities should also be assigned so personnel understand who is responsible for risk management, controls, incident response, compliance, and other ISMS processes. Clear responsibilities reduce confusion and improve decision-making when security issues occur. Governance arrangements should be reviewed when organizational structures or responsibilities change. Appropriate segregation of duties should also be considered for sensitive activities. Strong governance ensures that information security is managed as an organizational responsibility rather than being treated solely as an IT function.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 367<\/b><\/h3>\n

              Why should organizations maintain an up-to-date asset inventory?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. To increase the number of unknown assets<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. To provide visibility of assets that require appropriate protection<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. To eliminate asset ownership<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. To prevent security classification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                An accurate asset inventory helps an organization understand what information, systems, devices, applications, services, and other assets exist within the relevant ISMS environment. Without adequate visibility, important assets may be overlooked during risk assessments, vulnerability management, access reviews, incident response, or continuity planning. Asset information can also support ownership assignment and classification. Inventories should be updated when assets are acquired, changed, transferred, retired, or removed. Automated discovery tools may assist where appropriate, but organizational validation remains important. Maintaining reliable asset information enables security controls to be applied consistently and helps ensure that resources are protected according to their business importance and associated risks.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 368<\/b><\/h3>\n

                What is an important purpose of logging security-relevant events?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. To consume storage without operational value<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. To prevent investigations<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. To provide evidence for monitoring, investigation, and accountability<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. To eliminate access control requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Security logging provides records of relevant activities that can support monitoring, investigation, troubleshooting, and accountability. Depending on the environment, logs may capture authentication events, privileged actions, configuration changes, access attempts, system errors, or security alerts. Logs should be protected against unauthorized modification or deletion and retained according to business, security, and legal requirements. Monitoring should focus on events that provide meaningful security information rather than collecting unnecessary data without a defined purpose. Effective logging can help identify suspicious activity, establish timelines during investigations, and provide evidence about actions performed on systems. Log management should therefore be integrated into the organization’s security monitoring processes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 369<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  What should be considered when determining information security training needs?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Only an employee’s job title<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Roles, responsibilities, required competence, and relevant security risks<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. The employee’s preferred training schedule only<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. The age of the organization’s systems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Training needs should be based on the responsibilities and competence requirements associated with each role. Personnel with administrative privileges, security responsibilities, access to sensitive information, or specialized technical duties may require more specific training than other employees. Training should address relevant policies, procedures, threats, reporting expectations, and technical practices where appropriate. Changes in technology, responsibilities, threats, or regulatory requirements may create new training needs. Organizations should evaluate whether training has achieved its intended purpose and maintain suitable records. A role-based approach ensures that personnel receive useful information rather than generic training that may not address the actual security risks associated with their responsibilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 370<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    What is the purpose of vulnerability management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. To identify, evaluate, prioritize, and address security weaknesses<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. To guarantee that software contains no vulnerabilities<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. To remove all security monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. To prevent organizations from applying patches<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Vulnerability management is a structured process for identifying and addressing weaknesses that could be exploited to compromise information systems or services. Activities may include vulnerability discovery, scanning, validation, risk assessment, prioritization, remediation, and verification. Prioritization should consider factors such as severity, exploitability, exposure, asset criticality, and potential business impact. Not every vulnerability can necessarily be fixed immediately, so compensating controls or risk acceptance may sometimes be appropriate. Vulnerability management should also cover relevant applications, infrastructure, devices, and third-party components. Continuous monitoring and periodic reassessment help ensure that newly discovered weaknesses are identified and addressed according to organizational risk priorities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 371<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      Why should security requirements be considered during procurement?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. To ensure acquired products and services can meet relevant security needs<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. To prevent organizations from evaluating suppliers<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. To eliminate contractual requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. To guarantee that every supplier uses identical technology<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer:4<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Security requirements should be considered during procurement so that products, systems, and services acquired by the organization provide an appropriate level of protection. Requirements may address authentication, encryption, logging, access control, vulnerability management, data protection, incident reporting, continuity, and compliance depending on the risk. Evaluating security requirements before purchase is generally more effective than attempting to introduce them after deployment. Supplier capabilities and security evidence may also need to be assessed. Procurement teams should coordinate with information security and relevant business owners to ensure that security requirements are practical and aligned with organizational needs. This approach reduces the likelihood of acquiring solutions that create unmanaged security risks.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 372<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        What is the purpose of separating development, testing, and production environments?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. To make software deployment impossible<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. To reduce the risk that development or testing activities affect live systems<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. To eliminate testing activities<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. To provide developers unrestricted production access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Separating development, testing, and production environments helps reduce the risk that development activities, experimental code, test data, or configuration changes will negatively affect live business operations. Different environments can have different access permissions, security controls, and approval requirements. Production access should be restricted to authorized personnel and managed according to business needs. Appropriate testing before deployment can identify defects and security weaknesses without exposing production systems unnecessarily. Separation also supports change management and segregation of duties. The specific architecture will depend on organizational requirements, but the principle is to maintain sufficient isolation to protect operational systems while allowing controlled development and testing activities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 373<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          What should an organization do when legal or regulatory requirements change?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Ignore the changes until an audit identifies them<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Assess their relevance and update applicable ISMS requirements or controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Remove existing compliance records<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Stop monitoring regulatory developments<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Changes in laws, regulations, contractual obligations, or other applicable requirements can affect the organization’s information security responsibilities. The organization should monitor relevant developments, determine which requirements apply, and assess whether existing policies, procedures, controls, contracts, or training need to be updated. Responsibilities for monitoring and interpreting requirements should be clearly assigned. Where changes introduce new obligations, appropriate implementation activities should be planned and tracked. Evidence of compliance should be maintained where necessary. Regular review helps prevent the organization from relying on outdated requirements. Integrating legal and regulatory monitoring into the ISMS supports continued compliance and reduces the risk of unexpected obligations or penalties.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 374<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            What is the main objective of secure configuration management?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. To maintain systems using controlled and appropriately secured configurations<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. To allow unrestricted configuration changes<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. To remove baseline standards<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. To prevent authorized system updates<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Secure configuration management establishes and maintains configurations that reduce unnecessary security exposure while supporting required business functions. Baselines can define approved settings for operating systems, applications, network devices, databases, cloud resources, and other technologies. Configuration changes should be controlled, reviewed, and documented where appropriate. Unnecessary services, ports, accounts, and features may be disabled according to organizational requirements. Periodic verification can identify unauthorized or unintended changes. Secure configuration management should be integrated with change management and vulnerability management because new vulnerabilities or business requirements may require baseline updates. Consistent configuration practices reduce attack surfaces and help maintain predictable security controls across technology environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 375<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              What is a key purpose of threat intelligence?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. To collect information without analyzing it<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. To provide relevant information about threats that can support security decisions<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. To replace all risk assessments<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. To guarantee that attacks cannot occur<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer:3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Threat intelligence provides analyzed information about threats, threat actors, attack techniques, vulnerabilities, indicators, and other relevant developments that may affect an organization. When appropriately evaluated, this information can support risk assessments, vulnerability prioritization, monitoring, incident response, and security planning. Threat intelligence should be relevant to the organization’s environment rather than simply collecting large quantities of information. Sources may include trusted industry organizations, vendors, government advisories, internal incident information, and other appropriate sources. Intelligence should be assessed for reliability and relevance before being used for decisions. Effective use of threat intelligence helps organizations adapt security measures to changing threat conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 376<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Why should security incident records be retained appropriately?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. To support analysis, accountability, lessons learned, and evidence requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. To ensure incidents are never investigated<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. To make all incident information publicly available<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. To replace incident response procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer:1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Incident records provide valuable information about what occurred, how the organization responded, and what improvements may be required. Records can support investigation, accountability, trend analysis, management reporting, lessons learned, and evidence requirements. Retention should consider legal, regulatory, contractual, operational, and security requirements. Incident information may contain sensitive details, so access should be restricted appropriately. Records should be protected against unauthorized alteration or deletion. Analysis of historical incidents can help identify recurring weaknesses and inform risk assessments and control improvements. Maintaining appropriate records therefore supports both effective incident management and continual improvement of the organization’s information security capabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 377<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  What is an important reason to conduct periodic internal audits of the ISMS?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. To identify whether the ISMS conforms to requirements and is effectively implemented<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. To guarantee that auditors will find no issues<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. To replace management review<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. To eliminate corrective actions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer:4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Internal audits provide an independent and systematic method for evaluating whether the ISMS conforms to defined requirements and is effectively implemented and maintained. Audits can examine policies, processes, controls, records, responsibilities, and operational practices against established criteria. Findings may identify conformity, nonconformity, weaknesses, or opportunities for improvement. Audit programs should consider organizational importance, previous results, changes, and relevant risks when determining audit scope and frequency. Auditors should have appropriate competence and objectivity. Results should be communicated to relevant management and followed by appropriate actions. Internal auditing provides useful assurance and supports continual improvement of the ISMS.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 378<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    What should happen when corrective action has been completed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. The organization should verify its effectiveness where appropriate<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. The issue should automatically be considered permanently resolved<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. The original evidence should be deleted<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. The corrective action should never be reviewed again<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer:4<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Completion of a corrective action does not necessarily demonstrate that the underlying problem has been effectively resolved. Where appropriate, the organization should verify whether the action addressed the identified cause and prevented or reduced recurrence. Verification may involve reviewing records, testing controls, conducting follow-up assessments, monitoring performance, or examining subsequent events. If the action is ineffective, additional measures may be necessary. Documentation should provide evidence of what was done and the results of the effectiveness review. This approach ensures that corrective actions produce meaningful improvements rather than simply closing issues administratively. Effective verification strengthens the continual improvement process.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 379<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      What is the purpose of defining information security responsibilities for employees?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. To ensure personnel understand their security obligations and expected actions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. To transfer all security accountability to employees<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. To eliminate management responsibility<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. To prevent employees from reporting incidents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer:3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Clearly defined responsibilities help personnel understand what is expected of them when protecting organizational information and systems. Responsibilities may cover acceptable use, access protection, incident reporting, handling of sensitive information, compliance with policies, and participation in security activities. Employees should receive appropriate awareness or training so that they understand these requirements. Responsibilities should be proportionate to roles and authority, and management remains accountable for establishing appropriate governance and controls. Clear expectations improve consistency and reduce uncertainty when security-related situations arise. They also support accountability by establishing who is responsible for specific activities and decisions within the organization’s information security management framework.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 380<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        What is the purpose of reviewing the effectiveness of implemented security controls?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. To determine whether controls continue to address relevant risks and requirements<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. To ensure controls can never be changed<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. To remove evidence of ineffective controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. To eliminate the need for risk management<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer:2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Security controls should be reviewed to determine whether they continue to operate effectively and address the risks and requirements for which they were implemented. Changes in threats, technology, business processes, organizational structure, or legal requirements may reduce the effectiveness or relevance of existing controls. Review activities can include monitoring, testing, internal audits, performance measurements, incident analysis, and management review. If weaknesses are identified, the organization may need to modify, replace, strengthen, or supplement controls. Regular effectiveness review helps ensure that resources remain focused on meaningful risk reduction. It also supports continual improvement and keeps the ISMS aligned with the organization’s changing security environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full PECB Lead Implementer Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 361 What is the primary purpose of conducting an information security risk assessment? To identify and evaluate risks that could affect information security objectives To eliminate the need for security controls To guarantee that no incidents will occur To replace the organization’s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20447"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20448,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20447\/revisions\/20448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}