{"id":21472,"date":"2026-09-25T05:27:11","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T05:27:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=21472"},"modified":"2026-09-25T05:27:11","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T05:27:11","slug":"hp-hpe6-a85-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/hp-hpe6-a85-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part7-q121-140\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HPE6-A85 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part7 Q121-140"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>HP HPE6-A85 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/p>\n


\n<\/b>Question 121. What is the PRIMARY purpose of Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) on supported AOS-CX switches?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> To create separate routing domains on each switch<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> To combine multiple physical switches into one logical switch with a unified control and management plane<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> To replace Ethernet with wireless connectivity<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> To create a separate spanning-tree instance for every port<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2. To combine multiple physical switches into one logical switch with a unified control and management plane<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

    VSF combines multiple supported physical AOS-CX switches into a single logical switching system. The switches are interconnected through standard Ethernet links designated as VSF links, while the stack operates with unified control and management. Administrators can therefore manage the stack more like one device instead of maintaining each member independently. This simplifies configuration and can increase port capacity and resiliency. HPE documents VSF support on several campus switch families, including supported 4100, 6100, 6200, and 6300 models depending on software version and platform capabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 122. Which VSF member normally acts as the Conductor during standard stack operation?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> The highest-numbered member<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> Any member selected randomly after every reboot<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> The last device added to the stack<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> The primary member, which is member ID 1<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 4. The primary member, which is member ID 1<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

      In an AOS-CX VSF stack, the primary member is member ID 1 and normally operates as the stack Conductor. The Conductor maintains the stack configuration, control plane, and software information and manages the interfaces and operations of the other members. HPE defines member 1 as the primary role and documents that it normally becomes Conductor during standard operation. This makes member numbering significant for VSF control-plane roles, even though other member IDs do not need to follow the physical cabling order.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 123. What is the PRIMARY role of the VSF Standby member?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> To maintain synchronized state and assume the Conductor role if the current Conductor fails<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> To carry only user traffic and no stack state<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> To function exclusively as an out-of-band management switch<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> To remain powered off until a failure occurs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1. To maintain synchronized state and assume the Conductor role if the current Conductor fails<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

        The VSF Standby provides control-plane redundancy for the stack. It maintains a synchronized copy of important state and configuration from the Conductor so it can take over if the active Conductor becomes unavailable because of a hardware or link failure. HPE identifies the user-configured secondary member as the device that normally assumes the Standby role. Other ordinary stack members do not maintain the same networking protocol state and are controlled by the Conductor. Configuring a Standby therefore significantly improves stack resiliency compared with operating a stack that has only a Conductor and ordinary members.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 124. What is the role of ordinary VSF members that are neither Conductor nor Standby?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> They independently run all routing protocols<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> They maintain separate configurations from the stack<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> Their interfaces are controlled by the Conductor, and they do not independently maintain the stack’s control-plane protocols<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> They automatically become standalone switches during normal operation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 3. Their interfaces are controlled by the Conductor, and they do not independently maintain the stack’s control-plane protocols<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

          Ordinary VSF members contribute physical interfaces and forwarding resources to the logical stack but do not operate independent control or management planes. HPE explains that these members do not run their own networking protocols or maintain independent protocol state. Instead, their interfaces are directly controlled and programmed by the Conductor. This architecture is one reason the collection of switches behaves as a single logical device. The Standby is different because it maintains synchronized control state and can take over the Conductor role, whereas normal members cannot normally become Conductor or Standby.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 125. Why is a ring topology generally preferred over a chain topology for a VSF stack?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> A ring provides an alternate VSF path, improving resilience if a single link or member fails<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> A chain always provides more redundant paths<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> A ring disables stack synchronization<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> A ring requires no VSF links<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. A ring provides an alternate VSF path, improving resilience if a single link or member fails<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

            In a VSF ring topology, each member normally has VSF connectivity toward two other members, creating an alternate path through the stack. HPE strongly recommends ring deployments where feasible because a single VSF-link failure or certain member failures do not necessarily isolate the remaining members. In a chain, there is only one path between some members, so a failure can divide the stack and cause greater disruption. The additional connectivity of the ring therefore provides better physical resilience and reduces the likelihood that one failed inter-member link will split the stack.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 126. What risk is greater in a VSF chain topology than in a ring topology?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> Every member becomes a Conductor simultaneously<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> All VLAN tags are removed<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> The stack automatically disables routing<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> A single VSF-link failure can split the stack because there may be no alternate path between members<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 4. A single VSF-link failure can split the stack because there may be no alternate path between members<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

              A VSF chain has only one logical path between certain stack members. If a critical VSF link fails, devices on opposite sides of that break can lose communication with one another, creating a stack-split condition. HPE contrasts this with ring topology, where another path usually remains available after one link failure. Because a split can create serious control and forwarding consequences, HPE provides split-detection mechanisms and recommends ring topology whenever practical. The topology decision therefore has a direct effect on the stack’s tolerance of physical interconnect failures.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 127. Why must every VSF member have a unique member ID?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> The member ID determines the switch’s IP subnet<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> Duplicate IDs create an identity conflict that prevents the new member from joining the stack correctly<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Member IDs are used only for PoE priority<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> The member ID determines its spanning-tree root cost<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 2. Duplicate IDs create an identity conflict that prevents the new member from joining the stack correctly<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                VSF relies on member IDs to uniquely identify physical switches within the logical stack. HPE states that every member must have a unique valid member number. If a new switch is configured with an ID already used by an existing stack member, the conflict prevents the joining device from becoming a normal part of the stack. Auto-stacking can assign an available member ID automatically, while manually expanding a stack requires the administrator to verify that the selected ID is unused. The member ID is therefore a stack identity value, not an IP addressing or spanning-tree metric parameter.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 128. Why is it recommended to configure a secondary member in a VSF stack?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> To provide a second independent routing table<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> To increase the number of VLAN IDs<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> To provide a Standby that can assume control if the Conductor fails<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> To eliminate the requirement for VSF links<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3. To provide a Standby that can assume control if the Conductor fails<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                  A VSF stack can forward traffic through multiple physical members, but control-plane availability also matters. Configuring a secondary member provides a designated Standby, which synchronizes state with the Conductor. If the Conductor fails, the Standby can transition to the Conductor role and continue controlling the logical stack. HPE specifically recommends configuring a secondary member because a stack with a Standby offers better resiliency and high availability. Without a Standby, recovery from a Conductor failure can be more disruptive even if other physical stack members remain powered and connected.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 129. What is the PRIMARY purpose of Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP)?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> To combine switches into a VSF stack<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> To provide DHCP services to multiple VLANs<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> To create routed ECMP paths<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> To prevent Layer 2 loops while allowing groups of VLANs to use separate spanning-tree instances<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 4. To prevent Layer 2 loops while allowing groups of VLANs to use separate spanning-tree instances<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                    MSTP prevents Layer 2 loops while improving scalability compared with running a completely separate spanning-tree topology for every VLAN. VLANs can be mapped into Multiple Spanning Tree Instances, and each instance can have its own loop-free forwarding topology. This also allows different VLAN groups to use different redundant links, providing useful load sharing. HPE identifies MSTP as the default spanning-tree mode on AOS-CX when spanning tree is enabled and recommends it particularly in networks containing larger numbers of VLANs.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 130. Why might MSTP be preferred over RPVST in a network with a large number of VLANs?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> MSTP can map multiple VLANs to one spanning-tree instance, reducing control-plane overhead<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> RPVST does not prevent loops<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> MSTP eliminates all BPDUs<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> RPVST cannot operate on AOS-CX switches<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1. MSTP can map multiple VLANs to one spanning-tree instance, reducing control-plane overhead<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                      RPVST creates a separate rapid spanning-tree instance for each VLAN. That provides granular control, but the control-plane workload grows as the number of VLANs increases. MSTP improves scalability by allowing several VLANs to share one spanning-tree instance. HPE’s AOS-CX guidance specifically recommends MSTP for networks with many VLANs because RPVST can create greater CPU load at larger scale. MSTP still permits multiple forwarding topologies because different VLAN groups can be mapped to different MSTIs, preserving some load-balancing flexibility while reducing the total number of independent spanning-tree calculations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 131. In RPVST mode, how is spanning tree applied to VLANs?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> All VLANs always share one common spanning tree<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> Spanning tree is disabled for VLAN traffic<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> A separate rapid spanning-tree instance can operate for each VLAN<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> Only the native VLAN participates in spanning tree<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 3. A separate rapid spanning-tree instance can operate for each VLAN<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Rapid Per-VLAN Spanning Tree provides an independent spanning-tree instance for each participating VLAN. This lets administrators choose different root bridges and forwarding paths on a per-VLAN basis, which can provide granular Layer 2 traffic engineering. HPE AOS-CX supports both MSTP and RPVST modes. RPVST is often attractive in networks with relatively few VLANs, while MSTP becomes more scalable as the number of VLANs grows. The flexibility of per-VLAN spanning tree therefore comes with greater control-plane overhead compared with grouping several VLANs into an MST instance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 132. How does a switch become preferred as the spanning-tree root bridge?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Configure it with the highest port number<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> Configure it with a lower bridge priority than competing switches<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> Configure every interface as an edge port<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> Increase its MAC address<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 2. Configure it with a lower bridge priority than competing switches<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Spanning tree elects the device with the lowest bridge identifier as root. The bridge priority is the administratively controllable portion of that value, so network designers normally configure the intended root bridge with a lower priority than competing switches. HPE’s validated campus design recommends setting aggregation switches to a low priority so they become the spanning-tree root rather than leaving root selection to default values. Intentional root placement produces more predictable forwarding paths and prevents an unsuitable access switch from becoming the Layer 2 topology’s reference point simply because of MAC-address-based tie breaking.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 133. What is the PRIMARY purpose of Root Guard on an access-switch-facing port of an aggregation switch?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> To prevent a downstream switch from unexpectedly becoming the spanning-tree root<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> To prevent DHCP starvation<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> To detect rogue wireless APs<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> To create an LACP bundle<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. To prevent a downstream switch from unexpectedly becoming the spanning-tree root<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Root Guard helps preserve the intended spanning-tree hierarchy. An aggregation or distribution switch may be deliberately configured as the root bridge. If a downstream access switch later sends superior BPDUs, it could otherwise influence root election and change forwarding paths unexpectedly. HPE’s validated campus design recommends enabling Root Guard on access-switch-facing connections while configuring aggregation devices with low spanning-tree priority. This prevents a downstream device from taking over the root role and helps maintain predictable Layer 2 topology. Root Guard therefore protects root placement, whereas BPDU Guard protects endpoint-facing ports from unexpected BPDU participation.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 134. What is the PRIMARY purpose of Virtual Switching Extension (VSX)?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> To turn every access switch into one VSF member<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> To disable link aggregation<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> To provide only wireless redundancy<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> To coordinate two independent AOS-CX switches for high availability and multichassis link aggregation while retaining separate control planes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 4. To coordinate two independent AOS-CX switches for high availability and multichassis link aggregation while retaining separate control planes<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                              VSX is a high-availability virtualization technology used on supported AOS-CX aggregation and core switches. Unlike VSF, where multiple switches form one logical switch with a unified control plane, VSX peers remain independent devices with separate control planes. They synchronize selected state and can present multichassis LAG connectivity to downstream or upstream devices. This design provides both device redundancy and active use of redundant links. HPE distinguishes VSX pairs from VSF stacks in Central onboarding and management workflows, reflecting their fundamentally different architectures.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 135. What is the role of the Inter-Switch Link (ISL) in a VSX pair?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> It provides wireless client roaming<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> It carries synchronization and appropriate traffic between the VSX peer switches<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> It replaces all upstream routed links<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> It is used only for SNMP polling<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 2. It carries synchronization and appropriate traffic between the VSX peer switches<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                The VSX Inter-Switch Link is a fundamental connection between the two peer switches. It supports synchronization of relevant forwarding state and can carry traffic between the peers when required by the topology or failure state. Because VSX peers remain independent devices, the ISL is essential for coordinating their operation. HPE documentation separates ISL configuration from the keepalive path because they serve different functions: the ISL carries synchronization and data as required, while the keepalive provides independent heartbeat communication used particularly during ISL failures.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 136. What is the PRIMARY purpose of the VSX keepalive connection?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> To carry all normal user traffic between VSX switches<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> To replace the ISL entirely<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> To exchange heartbeat information so each peer can determine whether the other is alive, especially when the ISL fails<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> To assign IP addresses to the peers<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 3. To exchange heartbeat information so each peer can determine whether the other is alive, especially when the ISL fails<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  The VSX keepalive is a Layer 3 heartbeat connection between the two peer switches. HPE documents that keepalive packets use UDP and are particularly important when the ISL fails. If the peers can still hear each other over the keepalive path, they know the problem is the ISL rather than complete failure of the remote switch. This lets VSX take controlled protective action and reduces the risk of both devices independently forwarding as though the other peer were gone. The keepalive should therefore have independent Layer 3 reachability rather than depend on the ISL itself.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 137. Why should the VSX keepalive path be separated from the ISL path?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> To ensure an ISL failure does not simultaneously eliminate the heartbeat path needed to determine peer status<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> Because keepalive packets cannot use IP<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> Because the ISL operates only at Layer 1<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> Because the keepalive must traverse a wireless network<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 4. To ensure an ISL failure does not simultaneously eliminate the heartbeat path needed to determine peer status<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    The keepalive is most valuable when it remains available during an ISL failure. If both functions depend on the same physical path, one failure can remove synchronization and heartbeat communication at the same time, increasing the risk of a split-brain condition. HPE strongly recommends keeping the keepalive path separate from the ISL and recommends a dedicated Layer 3 link and, as a best practice, a dedicated VRF. The keepalive packet path should not be transported over the ISL. Independent failure domains make VSX split detection more reliable.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 138. What does a VSX split-brain condition mean?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> The two switches use different VLAN names<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> Both the ISL and keepalive are unavailable, preventing normal peer coordination and peer-state detection<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> The two peers run different routing protocols<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> The primary has more interfaces than the secondary<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2. Both the ISL and keepalive are unavailable, preventing normal peer coordination and peer-state detection<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      HPE defines a VSX split-brain scenario as a condition in which both the ISL and the keepalive connection are down. The peers can no longer synchronize through the ISL and also cannot reliably determine each other’s operational state through keepalive. This is dangerous because independent forwarding decisions can create duplicate-active behavior or other network instability. Proper VSX design therefore makes simultaneous loss of ISL and keepalive unlikely by using independent physical and Layer 3 paths. Split-recovery mechanisms assist when connectivity is restored, but good design should first minimize the chance of the condition occurring.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 139. If the VSX ISL fails but the keepalive confirms that both peers remain operational, what protective behavior can occur?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> The secondary can bring its VSX LAG links down while the primary continues forwarding through its links<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> Both switches must reboot immediately<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> The primary disables every routed interface<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> Both peers become VSF members automatically<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. The secondary can bring its VSX LAG links down while the primary continues forwarding through its links<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        When the ISL fails but the keepalive connection remains operational, both VSX peers know that the other switch is still alive. HPE documents that in this condition the user-configured primary keeps its multichassis VSX LAG links active, while the secondary forces its corresponding VSX LAG links down. This avoids a dangerous dual-active forwarding condition while synchronization is unavailable. After the ISL recovers, state such as MAC and ARP information can be synchronized again and normal forwarding relationships restored. The independent keepalive is what allows the peers to distinguish this scenario from total peer failure.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 140. A campus distribution design requires predictable Layer 2 root placement, scalable loop prevention across many VLANs, and redundant aggregation switches that remain independent while supporting multichassis LAGs. Which design BEST meets these requirements?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Use RPVST on every VLAN, allow access switches to become root, and deploy a single aggregation switch<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> Disable spanning tree because link aggregation automatically prevents every possible loop<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> Use MSTP with intentional root priority and Root Guard, together with a properly designed VSX pair using separate ISL and keepalive paths<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> Place every switch into one VSF stack regardless of platform or network role<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3. Use MSTP with intentional root priority and Root Guard, together with a properly designed VSX pair using separate ISL and keepalive paths<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          The requirements call for coordinated Layer 2 and high-availability design. MSTP scales efficiently across many VLANs by mapping VLAN groups to instances. Configuring aggregation switches with a low bridge priority provides predictable root placement, while Root Guard prevents downstream access switches from unexpectedly taking over the root role. VSX then provides two independent aggregation switches capable of supporting multichassis LAG connectivity. A separate ISL and keepalive design improves failure handling by preserving independent peer-status detection. Together, these mechanisms provide scalable loop prevention, predictable topology, and resilient aggregation.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full HP HPE6-A85 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. Question 121. What is the PRIMARY purpose of Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) on supported AOS-CX switches? To create separate routing domains on each switch To combine multiple physical switches into one logical switch with a unified control and management plane To replace Ethernet with wireless […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21472"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21472"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21473,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21472\/revisions\/21473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}