{"id":21639,"date":"2026-09-25T06:40:08","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T06:40:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=21639"},"modified":"2026-09-25T06:40:08","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T06:40:08","slug":"fortinet-nse5_fwb_ad-8-0-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-10-q181-200","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/fortinet-nse5_fwb_ad-8-0-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-10-q181-200\/","title":{"rendered":"Fortinet NSE5_FWB_AD-8.0 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part 10 Q181-200"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Fortinet NSE5_FWB_AD-8.0 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 181. A FortiWeb administrator wants to protect a web application from requests that use unusual URL encoding to bypass security inspection. Which configuration is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Configure URL normalization and encoding validation<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> Increase the backend server connection timeout<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> Disable HTTP request inspection<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> Enable only client-side browser caching<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. Configure URL normalization and encoding validation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

    URL normalization helps FortiWeb interpret different representations of the same URL consistently before applying security controls. Attackers may use encoded characters, alternate representations, or malformed URL syntax to attempt to bypass filtering and reach protected resources. By normalizing the request and validating its encoding, FortiWeb can inspect the effective request more consistently and apply URL-related security policies. Increasing backend timeouts or enabling browser caching does not address encoding-based evasion. Disabling inspection would reduce protection rather than improve it. Administrators should therefore ensure that URL normalization and appropriate validation are enabled when protecting applications against encoding and canonicalization techniques.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 182. A company hosts several HTTPS websites on the same FortiWeb virtual server IP address. Each site uses a different domain name and certificate. Which capability is important for identifying the requested HTTPS site?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> HTTP response compression<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> Server health checks<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> Server Name Indication (SNI)<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> IP-based session persistence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 3. Server Name Indication (SNI)<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

      SNI allows a TLS client to indicate the hostname it is attempting to access during the TLS handshake. This enables FortiWeb to distinguish among multiple HTTPS websites sharing the same IP address and select the appropriate certificate and configuration. This is especially important when multiple protected domains are hosted on a common virtual server address. Health checks are used to determine backend availability, while session persistence controls how client sessions remain associated with backend servers. Response compression affects application delivery rather than TLS site identification. SNI therefore provides the mechanism needed to support multiple HTTPS domains on a shared IP infrastructure.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 183. A security administrator has created a WAF signature exception for a specific application parameter because legitimate requests are being blocked. What should the administrator verify before broadly applying the exception?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> Whether the exception scope is limited to the affected parameter or traffic<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> Whether all FortiWeb interfaces have identical IP addresses<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> Whether HTTP caching is completely disabled<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> Whether every backend server uses the same hostname<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1. Whether the exception scope is limited to the affected parameter or traffic<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

        WAF exceptions should be narrowly scoped whenever possible. If a legitimate application parameter is triggering a false positive, an administrator should first determine exactly which signature, parameter, URL, or application context is responsible. A narrowly targeted exception can reduce the risk of allowing genuinely malicious traffic elsewhere. Applying a broad exception may disable protection for unrelated requests and create an unnecessary security gap. Interface addressing, caching, and backend hostname consistency do not determine whether a WAF signature exception is safely scoped. Testing the exception against both legitimate and malicious examples is also useful before deploying it broadly.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 184. A FortiWeb administrator needs to distribute requests across three healthy backend servers while ensuring that new connections are generally spread according to the number of active connections on each server. Which load-balancing approach is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> Source-IP persistence only<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> Round-robin without health monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> Static URL rewriting<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> Least-connections load balancing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 4. Least-connections load balancing<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

          Least-connections load balancing directs new requests toward the backend server currently handling the fewest active connections. This can be useful when individual client sessions have different durations or resource requirements, because it considers the current connection distribution rather than simply cycling through servers. Round-robin distributes requests sequentially and does not account for current connection counts. Source-IP persistence is intended to maintain client affinity rather than dynamically distribute connections. URL rewriting changes request destinations or paths and is unrelated to load-balancing decisions. FortiWeb administrators should also ensure that unhealthy servers are removed from selection through appropriate health-check configuration.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 185. A protected application requires clients to remain associated with the same backend server because the application stores session state locally. Which FortiWeb feature should the administrator configure?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> HTTP response caching<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> Session persistence<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> Geographic IP filtering<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> URL normalization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2. Session persistence<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

            Session persistence, sometimes called session affinity, helps ensure that requests from the same client session continue to reach the same backend server. This is important when an application maintains session information locally rather than storing it in a shared session repository. Without persistence, load balancing may send subsequent requests to different servers, potentially causing users to lose authentication state or application context. HTTP caching improves delivery efficiency but does not maintain backend affinity. Geographic filtering controls access based on location, while URL normalization addresses request representation. Administrators should select an appropriate persistence mechanism based on how the application identifies and maintains client sessions.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 186. A web application should only accept POST and GET requests. An attacker attempts to send an unexpected HTTP method to a protected URL. Which control can help prevent this request from reaching the application?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> HTTP method restriction<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> Backend certificate renewal<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> Response caching<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> Server pool reordering<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1. HTTP method restriction<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

              HTTP method restriction allows an administrator to define which HTTP methods are permitted for a protected application or URL. If an application only requires GET and POST, methods such as PUT, DELETE, TRACE, or other unexpected methods can be restricted according to the application’s legitimate requirements. Reducing the accepted method set can decrease the exposed attack surface and help prevent unsupported request types from reaching backend systems. Certificate renewal concerns TLS identity, response caching concerns content delivery, and server pool ordering concerns backend selection. The administrator should validate the application’s actual requirements before blocking methods so that legitimate functionality is not inadvertently disrupted.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 187. A FortiWeb administrator receives repeated alerts for a WAF signature, but application testing confirms that the matching requests are legitimate. Which action is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Disable all WAF protection globally<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> Remove the affected backend server<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Investigate the matched signature and create a narrowly scoped exception if justified<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> Disable logging for the entire policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3. Investigate the matched signature and create a narrowly scoped exception if justified<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                A repeated alert caused by legitimate application behavior may indicate a WAF false positive. The administrator should first review the security event, identify the exact signature and request component that triggered the match, and confirm that the traffic is genuinely legitimate. If the application behavior is expected and the signature cannot be tuned appropriately, a narrowly scoped exception can be considered. Disabling WAF protection globally would unnecessarily reduce security. Removing a backend server does not address the inspection issue, and disabling logging would make future analysis more difficult. Proper exception handling preserves protection for unrelated traffic while accommodating verified application behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 188. An administrator wants FortiWeb to reject uploaded files that contain malicious content before they are delivered to the backend web server. Which security capability addresses this requirement?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Geographic access control<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> HTTP caching<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> DNS load balancing<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> Antivirus and file-upload inspection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 4. Antivirus and file-upload inspection<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Antivirus and file-upload inspection can inspect uploaded content before it is passed to the protected backend application. This provides an additional security layer for applications that accept documents, images, archives, or other user-supplied files. Malicious files can otherwise become a delivery mechanism for malware or exploit attempts against backend systems or application users. Geographic access control determines whether clients from specified locations may connect, while caching is intended to improve content delivery. DNS load balancing is a separate traffic-distribution mechanism. Administrators should configure file inspection according to application requirements and consider appropriate limits for file size and supported content types.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 189. A company wants to ensure that users accessing an application through HTTP are redirected to HTTPS. Which configuration best supports this requirement?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> HTTP-to-HTTPS redirection<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> Backend server health checking<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> Cookie-based persistence only<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> API schema discovery<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. HTTP-to-HTTPS redirection<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                    HTTP-to-HTTPS redirection instructs clients that access the application through an insecure HTTP endpoint to retry the request using HTTPS. This helps enforce encrypted client-to-FortiWeb communication and reduces exposure of sensitive information over plaintext HTTP. The administrator should also ensure that the HTTPS virtual server has a valid certificate and that the application is correctly configured for secure access. Health checks determine backend availability, persistence maintains session affinity, and API schema discovery is related to API security. Redirecting users to HTTPS is therefore the appropriate control when the objective is to transition HTTP requests to the secure protocol.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 190. A backend application requires FortiWeb to validate that a request parameter contains only an integer within a specified range. Which security mechanism is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> HTTP response caching<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> Data validation<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> Geographic filtering<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> Server pool persistence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Data validation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Data validation allows FortiWeb to enforce expected formats and values for application input. If a parameter should contain only an integer within a defined range, validation can help reject malformed, unexpected, or potentially malicious input before it reaches the backend application. This can reduce exposure to attacks that exploit weak input handling. Caching does not validate request parameters, geographic filtering controls access according to location, and persistence determines backend affinity. Administrators should configure validation according to the application’s actual input requirements and test both valid and invalid requests to avoid blocking legitimate transactions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 191. An administrator wants to protect an API by ensuring that incoming requests conform to the expected structure and permitted fields defined for the API. Which capability is most relevant?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> API request validation<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> HTTP caching<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> Server certificate generation<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> Geographic load balancing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. API request validation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                        API request validation helps ensure that incoming API traffic conforms to expected structures, parameters, and permitted values. This is important because APIs commonly expose structured inputs that can be abused when applications accept unexpected fields, data types, or malformed requests. Validation can help prevent inappropriate input from reaching backend services and complements other API security controls. HTTP caching focuses on delivery performance, certificate generation addresses TLS identity, and geographic load balancing distributes traffic based on location or infrastructure. Administrators should define validation rules based on the API’s documented behavior and monitor rejected requests for signs of legitimate client incompatibility or attempted abuse.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 192. A FortiWeb administrator needs to protect a web application from clients that generate an excessive number of requests within a short period. Which control should be considered?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Certificate chain configuration<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> URL rewriting<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> Rate limiting<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> HTTP response compression<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3. Rate limiting<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Rate limiting restricts how frequently clients or traffic sources can make requests to a protected application. It can help reduce the impact of abusive clients, automated request floods, and certain application-layer denial-of-service conditions. The administrator should establish thresholds that reflect normal application behavior so legitimate users are not unnecessarily blocked. Certificate configuration protects TLS identity, URL rewriting modifies request paths or destinations, and response compression reduces the amount of data transmitted. Rate limiting is therefore the relevant control for controlling excessive request frequency. Depending on the threat, it may be combined with bot management and other DoS protections for broader coverage.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 193. A FortiWeb administrator discovers that a protected virtual host is not matching the intended security policy. The client is connecting to the correct IP address, but the Host header contains an unexpected domain. What should be investigated first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> HTTP caching duration<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> Virtual host and Host-header matching<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> Backend antivirus signatures<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> Server disk utilization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2. Virtual host and Host-header matching<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                            FortiWeb can use virtual-host information and the requested hostname to determine which protected application or policy should process traffic. If the Host header does not match the expected domain, the request may be associated with a different virtual server or policy than intended. The administrator should therefore verify the configured hostnames, virtual server associations, and policy matching conditions. Caching duration does not determine which security policy handles the request. Backend antivirus signatures and server disk utilization are unrelated to the initial policy-selection problem. Reviewing the request details and FortiWeb policy matching information can help identify why the expected rule was not selected.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 194. A company uses several TLS certificates on FortiWeb and wants to verify that the private key associated with a newly imported certificate is correct. What should the administrator verify?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Whether the certificate and private key form a valid matching pair<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> Whether HTTP caching is enabled<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> Whether the backend uses round-robin balancing<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> Whether the application permits DELETE requests<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 1. Whether the certificate and private key form a valid matching pair<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A TLS certificate must correspond to its associated private key for FortiWeb to successfully use that certificate for secure connections. When importing certificates, administrators should verify that the certificate and private key match and that the certificate chain is complete and trusted as required. A mismatched key can prevent successful TLS service or cause certificate-related errors. HTTP caching, backend load-balancing methods, and permitted HTTP methods do not establish the cryptographic relationship between a certificate and private key. Proper certificate management is especially important when multiple domains, SNI, or different protected applications are configured on the same FortiWeb appliance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 195. A protected application has legitimate clients that use a trusted automation service. FortiWeb’s bot controls are challenging these clients unnecessarily. What should the administrator do?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Disable all bot protection permanently<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> Block every automated request<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> Review the bot detection result and appropriately allow or exempt the verified trusted service<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> Disable all application security policies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 3. Review the bot detection result and appropriately allow or exempt the verified trusted service<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Bot management should distinguish between malicious automation and legitimate automated clients. If a known service is repeatedly challenged, the administrator should examine the detection result and verify the service’s identity and expected behavior. Where FortiWeb provides an appropriate mechanism for trusted bots or controlled exemptions, the administrator can configure a narrowly scoped allowance rather than disabling bot protection globally. Permanently disabling protection would remove useful defenses against malicious automation, while blocking all automated traffic could disrupt legitimate integrations. Application security policies are unrelated to the specific bot-detection decision. Any exemption should be based on verified characteristics and limited to the required traffic.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 196. A FortiWeb HA pair experiences a failover, and the administrator wants to verify whether configuration changes are synchronized between the members. Which area should be reviewed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> HA configuration and synchronization status<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> Browser cache settings<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> Client DNS search suffixes<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> HTTP response compression<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1. HA configuration and synchronization status<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  In a FortiWeb high-availability deployment, administrators should verify that the cluster members are correctly configured and that relevant configuration data is synchronized. After a failover, unexpected behavior may result if the secondary member does not have the same required policies, certificates, security settings, or other synchronized configuration. Reviewing HA status and synchronization information can help identify whether the cluster is operating as expected. Browser caching and HTTP compression affect application delivery rather than HA synchronization, while client DNS search suffixes are generally unrelated to FortiWeb configuration replication. Regularly monitoring HA health and synchronization helps reduce configuration inconsistencies during failover events.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 197. An administrator is troubleshooting an application security incident and needs to determine which FortiWeb rule actually matched a suspicious request. Which information is most useful?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> The monitor’s display resolution<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> Security event details showing the matched policy or rule<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> The backend server’s screen resolution<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> The browser’s bookmark configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 2. Security event details showing the matched policy or rule<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Security event details can provide important information about how FortiWeb processed a suspicious request, including the relevant policy, security profile, signature, action, and request characteristics. Reviewing the matched rule helps administrators understand why the traffic was allowed, monitored, blocked, or otherwise handled by the appliance. This information is valuable when investigating false positives, missed detections, or unexpected policy behavior. Display settings, browser bookmarks, and backend screen resolution have no meaningful relationship to FortiWeb rule matching. A systematic investigation should correlate security events with policy configuration and request details rather than relying only on the final action observed by the user.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 198. A web application has a custom health-check endpoint that returns HTTP 200 only when the application is functioning correctly. How should FortiWeb use this information?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Configure a health check to test the appropriate URI and expected response<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> Disable all server health monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> Use URL rewriting to change the application’s response code<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> Configure the endpoint as a client-side cookie<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1. Configure a health check to test the appropriate URI and expected response<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      A custom application health-check endpoint can provide a more meaningful indication of application availability than simply checking whether a TCP port is open. FortiWeb can use an appropriate health-check configuration to request the specified URI and evaluate the expected response. If the endpoint does not return the expected result, FortiWeb can treat the backend as unhealthy and avoid directing normal traffic to it, depending on the configured behavior. Disabling health monitoring removes this protection, while URL rewriting and cookies do not perform backend availability checks. Administrators should choose a health-check endpoint that accurately reflects application functionality.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 199. A security team wants to review newly discovered vulnerabilities in a web application before deciding which remediation actions are required. Which FortiWeb capability can assist with identifying web application vulnerabilities?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> Session persistence<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> Web vulnerability scanning<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> HTTP compression<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> Backend load balancing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2. Web vulnerability scanning<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Web vulnerability scanning is designed to identify weaknesses in web applications by testing accessible application functionality and looking for known vulnerability conditions. It can provide administrators and security teams with information that supports remediation and security hardening. Scanning results should be reviewed carefully because automated testing may require validation before a finding is treated as a confirmed vulnerability. Session persistence affects backend affinity, HTTP compression affects delivery efficiency, and load balancing distributes requests among servers. Vulnerability scanning therefore provides the most relevant capability for discovering potential application weaknesses that should be investigated and addressed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 200. A FortiWeb administrator wants to reduce security risk while troubleshooting a suspected policy-matching problem in production. Which approach is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Disable every security profile immediately<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> Delete the affected application policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> Review traffic and security logs, verify policy matching, and make the smallest controlled configuration change<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> Remove all backend servers from the server pool<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3. Review traffic and security logs, verify policy matching, and make the smallest controlled configuration change<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Production troubleshooting should be systematic and controlled. The administrator should first review traffic and security logs to determine how FortiWeb is processing the affected requests, then verify virtual-server, Host-header, policy-order, security-profile, and backend conditions as appropriate. Once the cause is understood, the administrator should make the smallest configuration change necessary and monitor the result. Disabling all security profiles or deleting policies can create unnecessary exposure, while removing backend servers can cause service disruption without addressing the matching problem. Controlled troubleshooting preserves existing protections and makes it easier to identify which configuration change resolved the issue.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Fortinet NSE5_FWB_AD-8.0 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 181. A FortiWeb administrator wants to protect a web application from requests that use unusual URL encoding to bypass security inspection. Which configuration is most relevant? Configure URL normalization and encoding validation Increase the backend server connection timeout Disable HTTP request inspection Enable […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21639"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21639"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21640,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21639\/revisions\/21640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}