{"id":21728,"date":"2026-09-25T07:05:23","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T07:05:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=21728"},"modified":"2026-09-25T07:05:23","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T07:05:23","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-720-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-14-q261-280","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-720-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-14-q261-280\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-720 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part 14 Q261-280"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-720 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 261. An administrator wants the Cisco Secure Email Gateway to reject messages for recipients that do not exist in the organization’s directory before accepting the message body. Which feature should be integrated with recipient validation?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> LDAP<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> AMP<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> Outbreak Filters<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> SenderBase Reputation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 1. LDAP<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

    LDAP integration can allow the Secure Email Gateway to query an organization’s directory to determine whether a recipient exists. When configured for recipient validation, this can prevent messages for invalid recipients from being accepted and processed further. This approach reduces unnecessary mail processing and helps limit directory-harvesting attempts. AMP is primarily associated with malware and file analysis, while Outbreak Filters address emerging email threats. SenderBase Reputation evaluates the reputation of sending sources. LDAP-based recipient validation is therefore appropriate when the gateway needs to verify recipients against an enterprise directory during SMTP processing.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 262. A company wants to restrict inbound SMTP connections based on the reputation and IP address of the connecting mail server. Which Secure Email Gateway feature should the administrator configure?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Recipient Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> Data Loss Prevention<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> Host Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> Message Tracking<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 3. Host Access Table<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

      The Host Access Table (HAT) is used to classify and control incoming SMTP connections based on characteristics of the connecting host, particularly its IP address and associated sender-group configuration. HAT sender groups can be configured to apply different mail-flow policies to trusted, untrusted, or restricted sources. The Recipient Access Table focuses primarily on recipient-domain and recipient acceptance controls. DLP is concerned with sensitive information, while Message Tracking is used to investigate individual messages. HAT is therefore the appropriate feature when the requirement is controlling inbound SMTP connections according to source characteristics.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 263. An administrator wants messages from a specific trusted partner to bypass aggressive connection throttling while still being subject to normal content security inspection. What should be configured?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> A dedicated HAT sender group with an appropriate mail-flow policy<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> A new DKIM selector<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> A DLP dictionary<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> A new reporting schedule<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1. A dedicated HAT sender group with an appropriate mail-flow policy<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

        A dedicated HAT sender group allows administrators to classify traffic from a trusted partner according to its source characteristics. The associated mail-flow policy can then define connection limits, rate controls, TLS requirements, and other SMTP handling behavior while normal message-level security scanning can continue. Creating a DKIM selector does not control connection throttling, and DLP dictionaries are designed for sensitive-information detection. Reporting schedules provide visibility rather than enforcement. Using HAT classification together with an appropriate mail-flow policy provides granular control over how trusted SMTP sources are handled without necessarily bypassing subsequent security inspection.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 264. Which statement correctly describes the relationship between the HAT and Mail Flow Policies on a Cisco Secure Email Gateway?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> HAT validates DKIM signatures, while Mail Flow Policies validate SPF<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> HAT determines sender-group classification, while the associated Mail Flow Policy defines how that traffic is handled<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> HAT manages message quarantine, while Mail Flow Policies generate reports<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> HAT controls outbound DNS, while Mail Flow Policies manage LDAP<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 2. HAT determines sender-group classification, while the associated Mail Flow Policy defines how that traffic is handled<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

          The Host Access Table classifies incoming SMTP connections into sender groups using configured criteria such as IP addresses and network ranges. Each sender group can then be associated with a Mail Flow Policy that defines how the connection and associated mail traffic should be handled. Mail Flow Policies can control settings such as connection behavior, rate limits, TLS requirements, and other SMTP controls. HAT does not validate DKIM or manage DNS, while Mail Flow Policies are not responsible for LDAP management. Understanding this relationship is important when troubleshooting unexpected SMTP connection behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 265. An organization requires all outbound email to a particular business partner to use encrypted SMTP connections. What configuration should be considered?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> Disable TLS on the outbound listener<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> Configure mandatory TLS for the applicable destination<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> Add the partner’s domain only to the HAT<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> Enable SPF checking on the recipient domain<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2. Configure mandatory TLS for the applicable destination<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

            When an organization requires encrypted SMTP communication with a specific partner, mandatory TLS can be configured for the applicable outbound delivery policy or destination. With mandatory TLS, the gateway requires the remote server to establish a TLS-protected SMTP session before delivery proceeds. If the remote destination cannot meet the TLS requirement, the message may remain undelivered rather than being sent without encryption. Disabling TLS would contradict the requirement. HAT is primarily associated with inbound connection classification, while SPF is an email authentication mechanism and does not enforce transport encryption.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 266. A security administrator needs to identify whether an inbound message passed SPF authentication and whether the authenticated domain aligns with the visible From domain for DMARC evaluation. Which technology provides this combined policy framework?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> DLP<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> DKIM<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> DMARC<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> SNMP<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 3. DMARC<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

              DMARC builds on SPF and DKIM by evaluating authentication results together with domain alignment requirements. For SPF-based DMARC authentication, the domain authenticated by SPF must align with the domain presented in the visible From address according to the configured alignment mode. DMARC can also evaluate DKIM authentication and alignment. DLP is designed for sensitive-information protection, while SNMP is used for monitoring and management. DKIM itself provides message signing and authentication but does not provide the complete policy framework that combines SPF or DKIM authentication with From-domain alignment and enforcement instructions.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 267. An administrator notices that a message is being held because a content policy identified confidential information. Which action could be configured as the result of the DLP policy match?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Quarantine the message<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> Change the appliance hostname<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Disable DNS resolution<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> Restart the SMTP service<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1. Quarantine the message<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                DLP policies can identify sensitive or regulated information in email content and apply configured enforcement actions. Depending on organizational requirements and the specific policy configuration, an administrator may choose actions such as quarantining, blocking, notifying, or otherwise handling the message. Quarantine is particularly useful when an organization wants to prevent immediate delivery while allowing authorized personnel to review the message. Changing the hostname, disabling DNS, or restarting SMTP services are not DLP enforcement actions. Administrators should carefully tune DLP rules to balance protection against false positives and unnecessary message holds.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 268. A message contains a suspicious attachment that is not yet associated with a known malware signature. Which Cisco Secure Email Gateway capability can provide additional cloud-based file analysis and retrospective protection?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> Recipient Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> Advanced Malware Protection<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> Host Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> SMTP AUTH<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 2. Advanced Malware Protection<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) provides additional protection against malicious files and can use cloud-based analysis and threat intelligence to identify suspicious content beyond traditional signature-based detection. Its capabilities can include file reputation, analysis, and retrospective detection when a file initially appears safe but is later identified as malicious. RAT and HAT provide SMTP access controls rather than file analysis. SMTP AUTH is used to authenticate SMTP clients or users. AMP is therefore appropriate when an organization needs additional protection against sophisticated or previously unknown malicious attachments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 269. Which component determines whether an inbound SMTP connection is permitted, throttled, or rejected before message-level processing occurs?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Host Access Table and its associated sender-group policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> DKIM selector<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> DLP policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> Message Tracking database<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Host Access Table and its associated sender-group policy<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                    The Host Access Table operates at the SMTP connection level and classifies connecting hosts into sender groups. The associated Mail Flow Policy can then determine how those connections should be handled, including whether connections are accepted, restricted, rate-limited, or rejected. This processing occurs before many message-level security controls are applied. DKIM selectors are used for DKIM signing or verification, DLP evaluates message content, and Message Tracking records processing information rather than controlling the initial connection. Therefore, HAT and its associated policy are the primary mechanisms for controlling inbound SMTP connection behavior.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 270. An administrator needs to determine why messages from a particular IP address are being rejected immediately during the SMTP connection phase. Which information should be examined first?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> The DKIM public key<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> The HAT sender-group classification and Mail Flow Policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> The DLP quarantine retention period<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> The DMARC aggregate report<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. The HAT sender-group classification and Mail Flow Policy<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Immediate rejection during the SMTP connection phase commonly points to connection-level policy rather than message-content inspection. The administrator should examine which HAT sender group matched the source IP address and then review the Mail Flow Policy associated with that group. The policy may specify rejection, throttling, connection limits, or other restrictions. DKIM and DMARC generally relate to message authentication, while DLP operates on message content. Examining HAT classification and the associated policy provides the most direct way to determine why the connection was rejected before normal message processing.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 271. A company wants to authenticate internal applications before allowing them to submit outbound email through the Secure Email Gateway. Which SMTP capability can provide this authentication?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> SMTP AUTH<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> SPF<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> DKIM<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> DMARC<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. SMTP AUTH<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                        SMTP AUTH allows an SMTP client to authenticate before submitting email, making it useful for controlling authenticated outbound submission by applications, users, or other mail systems. Depending on the deployment, authentication can help distinguish authorized senders from unauthorized systems attempting to relay mail. SPF and DKIM are email authentication mechanisms used primarily to establish sending-domain authenticity and message integrity, while DMARC builds policy around SPF and DKIM results. SMTP AUTH is therefore the appropriate capability when the requirement specifically involves authenticating the SMTP client before permitting mail submission.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 272. An administrator wants to prevent invalid recipients from consuming processing resources and generating unnecessary delivery attempts. Which action is most appropriate during SMTP recipient processing?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> Accept all recipients and rely exclusively on outbound retries<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> Disable recipient validation<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> Validate recipients against an appropriate recipient source before accepting the message<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> Replace the RAT with a DKIM signing profile<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3. Validate recipients against an appropriate recipient source before accepting the message<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Recipient validation can prevent the Secure Email Gateway from accepting messages addressed to recipients who do not exist. Depending on the deployment, recipient validation can use local recipient information or an external directory such as LDAP. Rejecting invalid recipients during the SMTP transaction avoids unnecessary message storage, scanning, delivery attempts, and bounce processing. Simply accepting every recipient and relying on later delivery failures wastes resources and can create backscatter or directory-harvesting concerns. DKIM is unrelated to recipient existence. Proper recipient validation should therefore be implemented as part of inbound mail acceptance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 273. An organization wants to use a different policy for messages originating from a known internal IP range than for unknown Internet senders. Which configuration provides this distinction at the SMTP connection level?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> A separate DKIM selector<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> A HAT sender group for the internal source range<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> A DLP dictionary<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> A DMARC aggregate report<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 2. A HAT sender group for the internal source range<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                            HAT sender groups allow administrators to classify SMTP connections according to source information such as IP addresses and network ranges. An internal IP range can therefore be placed into a dedicated sender group and assigned a Mail Flow Policy with controls appropriate for trusted internal systems. This provides different connection-level treatment from unknown Internet senders. DKIM selectors identify signing keys, DLP dictionaries identify sensitive content, and DMARC reports provide authentication-related reporting. HAT sender-group configuration is consequently the appropriate mechanism for distinguishing internal and external SMTP sources at connection time.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 274. A receiving administrator wants to verify that a message was signed by the sending domain and that the message content was not altered after signing. Which mechanism provides this capability?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> SMTP AUTH<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> DKIM<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> LDAP<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> SNMP<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2. DKIM<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                              DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) uses a cryptographic signature to associate an email with a signing domain and provide integrity protection for selected message components. The sender signs the message using a private key, while the receiving system retrieves the corresponding public key from DNS using the DKIM selector. The receiving system can then validate the signature and determine whether the signed content was modified after signing. SMTP AUTH authenticates SMTP clients, LDAP provides directory services, and SNMP supports monitoring. DKIM is therefore the appropriate mechanism for domain-based message signing and integrity verification.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 275. A security administrator wants to monitor emerging email attacks where attackers rapidly change message characteristics to evade traditional static filtering. Which feature is designed to identify and respond to emerging email outbreaks?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> Recipient Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> Outbreak Filters<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> SMTP AUTH<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> LDAP<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 2. Outbreak Filters<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Outbreak Filters are designed to help detect and manage emerging email threats by using threat intelligence and behavioral or reputation-based information associated with outbreaks. They can provide additional protection when attackers modify message characteristics rapidly and a traditional static signature may not yet provide sufficient coverage. RAT manages recipient acceptance, SMTP AUTH provides client authentication, and LDAP supplies directory information. Outbreak Filters therefore address the requirement for protection against emerging email campaigns and threats. Their configuration should be integrated with the organization’s broader anti-spam, malware, and message-filtering strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 276. An administrator wants to determine whether a message was placed in a quarantine and later released by an administrator. Which capability should be used to investigate the message’s processing history?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Message Tracking<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> DNS MX lookup<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> HAT sender-group configuration<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> SNMP community configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1. Message Tracking<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Message Tracking provides detailed information about the processing lifecycle of individual messages. It can help administrators determine whether a message was received, filtered, quarantined, released, delivered, deferred, or otherwise handled by the appliance. Quarantine interfaces can be used to manage held messages, but Message Tracking is particularly useful when reconstructing the sequence of events associated with a specific message. DNS MX records identify mail destinations, HAT controls connection classification, and SNMP supports monitoring. Therefore, Message Tracking is the appropriate investigation tool when the administrator needs to follow an individual message through its processing history.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 277. An organization wants to publish its SPF policy so that receiving systems can determine which hosts are authorized to send email for its domain. Where is the SPF policy normally published?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> As an MX record<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> As a DNS TXT record<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> As a DKIM private key<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> As an SMTP response code<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 2. As a DNS TXT record<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    SPF policies are normally published in DNS using TXT records associated with the sending domain. The record identifies authorized sending hosts or mechanisms, allowing receiving systems to compare the connecting sender against the published policy. MX records identify mail-exchange hosts but do not themselves represent an SPF policy. DKIM private keys remain secret and are not published in DNS, while SMTP response codes are generated during mail transactions. Administrators should ensure that SPF records accurately reflect legitimate sending infrastructure and avoid unnecessarily complex or invalid records that can cause authentication problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 278. A company uses multiple external services to send mail on behalf of its domain. What should the administrator consider when creating the domain’s SPF policy?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Include the authorized sending mechanisms for all legitimate services<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> Publish the organization’s DKIM private key<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> Add every Internet IP address to the SPF record<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> Disable DMARC alignment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1. Include the authorized sending mechanisms for all legitimate services<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      An SPF record should identify the legitimate systems and services authorized to send email for the domain. When an organization uses multiple third-party platforms, those services must be represented using appropriate SPF mechanisms, such as <\/span>include<\/span>, IP addresses, or other supported mechanisms. Adding arbitrary Internet addresses would weaken the purpose of SPF and create unnecessary authorization. DKIM private keys must never be published, and DMARC alignment is a separate authentication concept. Administrators should also consider SPF DNS lookup limits and ensure that the resulting record remains valid and maintainable as sending services change.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 279. A message passes DKIM cryptographic verification, but the DKIM signing domain does not align with the visible From domain under the configured DMARC alignment rules. What is the potential result?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> DMARC can still fail despite a valid DKIM signature<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> The message automatically passes DMARC<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> SPF is disabled for the message<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> The DKIM private key is automatically replaced<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1. DMARC can still fail despite a valid DKIM signature<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        A valid DKIM signature does not automatically guarantee a DMARC pass. DMARC evaluates both DKIM authentication and alignment between the authenticated DKIM signing domain and the domain in the visible From address. If the signature is cryptographically valid but the domains do not satisfy the configured alignment requirements, the DKIM result may not provide a passing DMARC authentication result. DMARC can also consider aligned SPF authentication. Therefore, administrators troubleshooting DMARC failures should examine both authentication results and domain alignment rather than checking only whether a DKIM signature is technically valid.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 280. An administrator needs to identify whether a remote mail server temporarily deferred delivery or permanently rejected a message. Which information should be reviewed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> The appliance’s local hostname<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> The SMTP response code and associated delivery log information<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> The DKIM selector name only<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> The LDAP server’s display name<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 2. The SMTP response code and associated delivery log information<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          SMTP response codes provide important information about the result of a delivery attempt. Responses in the 4xx range generally indicate temporary conditions, allowing the Secure Email Gateway to retry delivery according to its configured behavior. Responses in the 5xx range generally indicate permanent failures that require correction before successful delivery can occur. Reviewing the response code together with delivery logs provides additional context about the remote server’s reason for deferral or rejection. DKIM, LDAP, and appliance hostname information do not directly establish whether a particular outbound SMTP delivery attempt succeeded or failed.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-720 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 261. An administrator wants the Cisco Secure Email Gateway to reject messages for recipients that do not exist in the organization’s directory before accepting the message body. Which feature should be integrated with recipient validation? LDAP AMP Outbreak Filters SenderBase Reputation […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21728"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21729,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21728\/revisions\/21729"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21728"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21728"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}