{"id":21730,"date":"2026-09-25T07:05:38","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T07:05:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=21730"},"modified":"2026-09-25T07:05:38","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T07:05:38","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-720-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-15-q281-300","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-720-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part-15-q281-300\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-720 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part 15 Q281-300"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-720 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 281. An administrator wants to ensure that an inbound message cannot be accepted unless the recipient domain is configured as a valid destination on the Cisco Secure Email Gateway. Which feature provides this control?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/b> Advanced Malware Protection<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. <\/b> Recipient Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. <\/b> Outbreak Filters<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. <\/b> SenderBase Reputation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2. Recipient Access Table<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

    The Recipient Access Table (RAT) controls how the Secure Email Gateway handles recipient domains during inbound SMTP processing. It allows administrators to define which recipient domains are accepted and what action should occur when a message is addressed to a domain that is not configured for acceptance. This helps prevent unauthorized relay and invalid recipient traffic. AMP focuses on malware protection, Outbreak Filters address emerging email threats, and SenderBase Reputation provides sender reputation information. The RAT is therefore the appropriate component when the requirement involves controlling which recipient domains the appliance will accept mail for.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 282. A company wants to apply different connection limits to two groups of senders: trusted partners and unknown Internet hosts. Which configuration should be used?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. <\/b> Separate HAT sender groups with appropriate Mail Flow Policies<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. <\/b> Separate DKIM selectors<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. <\/b> Different DLP dictionaries<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. <\/b> Multiple DMARC aggregate reports<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 1. Separate HAT sender groups with appropriate Mail Flow Policies<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

      HAT sender groups classify incoming SMTP connections based on sender characteristics, including source IP addresses and network ranges. Each sender group can be associated with a Mail Flow Policy that defines connection limits, throttling, TLS behavior, and other SMTP controls. This allows trusted partners and unknown Internet sources to receive different treatment without requiring separate appliances. DKIM selectors are used for message signing, DLP dictionaries identify sensitive information, and DMARC reports provide authentication reporting. Using HAT sender groups with appropriate Mail Flow Policies provides the required connection-level differentiation.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 283. An administrator notices that the Secure Email Gateway accepts an SMTP connection but later rejects the message after examining its content. Which type of control is most likely responsible?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. <\/b> HAT connection classification<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. <\/b> DNS MX resolution<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. <\/b> Message-level security or content policy<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. <\/b> Network interface configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3. Message-level security or content policy<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

        If an SMTP connection is accepted but the message is rejected later during processing, the decision is likely being made by a message-level security or content policy rather than the initial HAT connection controls. Message processing can involve anti-spam, malware scanning, DLP, message filters, URL filtering, and other security policies. HAT primarily determines how an SMTP connection is classified and handled at the connection level. DNS MX resolution and interface configuration do not normally provide content-based rejection decisions. Message Tracking can help identify which processing stage and policy caused the final disposition.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 284. A security team wants the Secure Email Gateway to scan URLs contained in messages and apply a configured action when a destination is classified as malicious. Which capability should be enabled?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. <\/b> LDAP recipient validation<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. <\/b> URL Filtering<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. <\/b> SMTP AUTH<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. <\/b> SNMP monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 2. URL Filtering<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

          URL Filtering provides security controls for URLs contained in email messages. Depending on the configured integration and policy, URLs can be evaluated against reputation and security intelligence, allowing the appliance to identify potentially malicious destinations and apply actions such as rewriting, blocking, or other configured handling. LDAP is used for directory-related functions, SMTP AUTH provides client authentication, and SNMP supports monitoring. URL Filtering is therefore the appropriate capability when the requirement is to inspect links contained within messages and apply security policy based on the reputation or classification of those URLs.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 285. An administrator wants to verify whether a message was accepted by the Secure Email Gateway before any content filtering occurred. Which SMTP stage provides the most relevant information?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. <\/b> MAIL FROM processing<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. <\/b> DNS DKIM lookup<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. <\/b> Quarantine retention<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. <\/b> Reporting aggregation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 1. MAIL FROM processing<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

            The SMTP transaction includes stages such as connection establishment, EHLO\/HELO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, and DATA. MAIL FROM processing identifies the envelope sender and occurs before the message body is transmitted during the DATA stage. Depending on the configured mail-flow policy, the gateway can make connection and sender-related decisions during these earlier SMTP stages. Content inspection generally requires the message data to be received. DNS DKIM lookups, quarantine retention, and reporting aggregation do not represent an SMTP transaction stage. Understanding SMTP sequencing helps administrators determine where a message was accepted or rejected.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 286. A remote mail server advertises STARTTLS, but the Secure Email Gateway cannot establish a trusted encrypted session because the certificate presented by the remote server is not trusted. Which area should be investigated?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. <\/b> DLP dictionaries<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. <\/b> Recipient Access Table<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. <\/b> TLS certificate trust configuration<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. <\/b> Message Tracking retention<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 3. TLS certificate trust configuration<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

              When TLS negotiation reaches certificate validation and the remote certificate cannot be trusted, the administrator should investigate the configured TLS trust and certificate validation settings. The gateway may need an appropriate trusted certificate authority or a policy that correctly handles the remote certificate. Certificate hostname, validity, chain, and trust relationships should be examined according to the organization’s security requirements. DLP, RAT, and Message Tracking retention do not establish whether a remote TLS certificate is trusted. Proper certificate validation is important when secure SMTP delivery requires authenticated TLS rather than encryption alone.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 287. A company wants to prevent its Secure Email Gateway from accepting messages for domains that it does not host or relay for. Which security objective is being addressed?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. <\/b> Open relay prevention<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. <\/b> DKIM key rotation<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. <\/b> Malware sandboxing<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. <\/b> DMARC reporting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1. Open relay prevention<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                Restricting accepted recipient domains is an important part of preventing unauthorized mail relay. If a gateway accepts messages for arbitrary external domains and then attempts to deliver them, attackers could potentially abuse the appliance to send unsolicited email. The Recipient Access Table and related listener or relay configuration can be used to ensure that only authorized recipient domains are accepted for the applicable mail flow. DKIM key rotation, malware analysis, and DMARC reporting address different security requirements. Proper relay restrictions help ensure that the Secure Email Gateway functions only as an authorized mail-transfer system.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 288. An administrator needs to identify whether a message was delayed because the destination server temporarily rejected a delivery attempt. Which SMTP response class should be examined?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. <\/b> 1xx<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. <\/b> 2xx<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. <\/b> 4xx<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. <\/b> 5xx<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3. 4xx<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                  SMTP response codes in the 4xx class generally represent temporary failures. When a remote server returns a 4xx response during delivery, the Secure Email Gateway can normally defer the message and retry according to its configured delivery behavior. Common examples include 421, 450, and 451, although the exact meaning depends on the response and accompanying text. A 2xx response generally indicates successful processing, while 5xx responses normally indicate permanent failures. Reviewing the complete SMTP response and delivery history is important because the response text provides additional information about the reason for the temporary failure.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 289. An organization wants to identify messages that violate a policy based on specific words, phrases, headers, or message characteristics and then apply a configured action. Which capability is appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. <\/b> Message Filters<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. <\/b> SNMP<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. <\/b> DNS MX records<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. <\/b> HAT sender groups<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1. Message Filters<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Message Filters can be used to evaluate messages against configured conditions involving message characteristics such as headers, sender or recipient information, and content-related criteria, depending on the filter configuration. When a condition matches, the administrator can define an appropriate action. HAT sender groups primarily classify SMTP connections, while SNMP provides monitoring and DNS MX records identify mail-exchange destinations. Message Filters are therefore appropriate when administrators need rule-based processing based on specific characteristics of individual messages. Careful ordering and testing of filters is important to prevent unintended actions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 290. An administrator wants to see whether a specific message was scanned by antivirus, filtered, quarantined, and eventually delivered. Which tool provides the most detailed per-message investigation?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. <\/b> System-wide reporting<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. <\/b> Message Tracking<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. <\/b> DNS lookup<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. <\/b> HAT configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 2. Message Tracking<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Message Tracking provides detailed information about the lifecycle of an individual message. Administrators can use it to investigate message receipt, filtering, security scanning, quarantine events, delivery attempts, deferrals, and final disposition. System-wide reports are better suited to aggregate trends and statistics, while DNS lookups identify mail destinations rather than message processing events. HAT configuration controls connection-level behavior and does not provide the complete history of a particular message. For incident investigation or troubleshooting a specific email, Message Tracking is therefore the most appropriate source of detailed processing information.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 291. An organization wants to use a directory service to obtain recipient addresses while avoiding unnecessary repeated queries for every message. Which LDAP-related capability can improve this behavior?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. <\/b> LDAP caching<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. <\/b> DKIM signing<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. <\/b> HAT throttling<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. <\/b> SMTP banner customization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1. LDAP caching<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                        LDAP caching can reduce the need for repeated directory queries by retaining relevant directory information for a configured period. This can improve efficiency when the Secure Email Gateway repeatedly validates recipients or retrieves directory-related information. The effectiveness and behavior depend on the configured cache parameters and LDAP integration. DKIM signing is unrelated to directory queries, HAT throttling controls SMTP connection behavior, and SMTP banners affect the presentation of the SMTP service. Proper LDAP caching should be configured carefully so that performance benefits do not result in unacceptable delays when directory information changes.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 292. A Secure Email Gateway is configured with multiple LDAP servers. The primary directory server becomes unavailable. What configuration capability can help maintain directory-based operations?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. <\/b> LDAP server failover<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. <\/b> DKIM selector rotation<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. <\/b> SPF softfail<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. <\/b> Message quarantine<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1. LDAP server failover<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                          LDAP server failover allows the Secure Email Gateway to use an alternate configured directory server when the preferred LDAP server is unavailable, depending on the deployment and configuration. This improves resilience for functions such as recipient validation and directory lookups. DKIM selector rotation is related to cryptographic signing keys, SPF softfail is an email authentication result, and quarantine holds messages for administrative handling. When directory availability is critical to mail acceptance or processing, configuring appropriate LDAP redundancy and testing failover behavior can help prevent a single directory-server failure from disrupting mail operations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 293. A company wants to reduce false positives from an anti-spam policy by assigning different handling to messages based on sender reputation. Which information can be useful for this decision?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. <\/b> SenderBase reputation information<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. <\/b> SMTP AUTH password length<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. <\/b> LDAP attribute descriptions<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. <\/b> DKIM private key contents<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1. SenderBase reputation information<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                            SenderBase reputation information can provide reputation data about sending sources and can be incorporated into email-security decisions. Administrators can use reputation-related information together with other security controls to determine how messages from different sources should be handled. Reputation should not necessarily be treated as the only security signal because legitimate senders can experience reputation changes and attackers can use compromised infrastructure. SMTP authentication, LDAP attributes, and DKIM private keys address different functions. Combining reputation with message-level inspection and authentication results can provide more context when tuning anti-spam policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 294. An administrator configures an SPF policy that identifies a sender as neither explicitly authorized nor explicitly unauthorized. Which SPF result corresponds to this condition?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. <\/b> Hard fail<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. <\/b> Softfail<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. <\/b> Neutral<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. <\/b> Pass<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 3. Neutral<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                              An SPF result of Neutral indicates that the domain’s policy does not make an assertion about whether the sending host is authorized. It is different from Pass, where the sender is authorized, and Fail, where the policy explicitly states that the sender is not authorized. Softfail represents a weaker indication that the sender is probably unauthorized but should not necessarily be rejected solely on that basis. Administrators should consider SPF results together with DKIM and DMARC rather than treating an individual SPF result as a complete determination of message legitimacy.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 295. An organization wants to collect information about messages that fail DMARC without immediately requesting that receiving systems reject or quarantine those messages. Which DMARC policy is appropriate for the monitoring phase?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. <\/b> p=reject<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. <\/b> p=quarantine<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. <\/b> p=none<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. <\/b> p=strict<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 3. <\/b>p=none<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                The DMARC <\/span>p=none<\/span> policy is commonly used during an initial monitoring phase. It requests that receiving systems do not apply DMARC-based quarantine or rejection solely because a message fails DMARC, while organizations can collect aggregate reporting information and identify legitimate sending sources. After reviewing the results and correcting authentication or alignment problems, an organization may move toward stronger enforcement such as quarantine or reject. <\/span>p=strict<\/span> is not the standard DMARC enforcement-policy value; strictness is associated with alignment settings. Careful monitoring helps reduce disruption when implementing DMARC.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 296. A security administrator wants to configure a rule that examines the subject and body of an email and sends matching messages to a quarantine. Which processing concept is most directly involved?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. <\/b> Content-based message filtering<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. <\/b> DNS MX resolution<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. <\/b> HAT sender classification<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. <\/b> SNMP polling<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1. Content-based message filtering<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Content-based message filtering allows administrators to evaluate message characteristics such as subject, body, headers, or other content conditions and apply actions when specified criteria are met. Quarantine can be used as an enforcement action when a message requires review rather than immediate delivery. HAT classification operates primarily at the SMTP connection level, DNS MX records identify destinations, and SNMP provides monitoring capabilities. When a rule must inspect the actual message content and take an action based on what it finds, content-based filtering is the appropriate processing concept.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 297. An administrator notices that a message was accepted from a sender but was later held because it matched an organization-specific security rule. Which tool should be used to determine which processing stage caused the hold?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. <\/b> Message Tracking<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. <\/b> DNS resolver configuration<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. <\/b> SMTP listener IP address alone<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. <\/b> SPF TXT record<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1. Message Tracking<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Message Tracking can provide detailed information about the processing events associated with a particular message. It can help administrators determine whether a message was held because of content filtering, DLP, anti-spam processing, malware detection, quarantine rules, or another configured policy. Reviewing the message’s event history is more useful than looking only at DNS records or the listener address. SPF records provide authentication-policy information but do not normally identify the complete processing path of an individual message. Message Tracking is therefore an essential troubleshooting tool for identifying where a message changed disposition.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 298. A company wants to enforce different outbound delivery behavior for a specific recipient domain while leaving other destinations unchanged. Which configuration approach is most appropriate?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. <\/b> Apply a destination-specific outbound policy<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. <\/b> Change the global appliance hostname<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. <\/b> Add the destination domain to an inbound HAT sender group<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. <\/b> Disable all outbound TLS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1. Apply a destination-specific outbound policy<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Destination-specific outbound policies allow administrators to apply different delivery requirements to selected recipient domains without changing behavior for every outbound destination. Such policies can be used to define requirements such as TLS behavior and other delivery controls according to the organization’s needs. Changing the appliance hostname has no relationship to destination-specific delivery. HAT sender groups primarily classify incoming SMTP connections and are therefore not the appropriate mechanism for controlling a particular outbound recipient domain. Disabling outbound TLS globally would also affect unrelated destinations and could weaken transport security.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 299. A receiving organization wants to verify that the domain in the visible From address is protected by a published DMARC policy. Which DNS hostname should be queried?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. <\/b> selector._domainkey.example.com<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. <\/b> mail.example.com<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. <\/b> _dmarc.example.com<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. <\/b> mx.example.com<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 3. <\/b>_dmarc.example.com<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        DMARC policies are published in DNS TXT records under the <\/span>_dmarc<\/span> subdomain of the domain being evaluated. For example, a policy for <\/span>example.com<\/span> is normally published at <\/span>_dmarc.example.com<\/span>. DKIM public keys are published under selector-specific <\/span>_domainkey<\/span> names, while mail hostnames and MX records identify mail infrastructure. Querying the <\/span>_dmarc<\/span> hostname allows a receiving system or administrator to retrieve the domain’s published DMARC policy and related reporting or alignment parameters. This policy is then used as part of DMARC evaluation together with SPF and DKIM authentication results.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 300. An administrator is troubleshooting a suspected mail loop in which messages repeatedly move between two mail systems. Which evidence would be most useful for confirming the loop?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. <\/b> Repeated delivery attempts between the same destinations in message and mail-flow logs<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. <\/b> The DKIM selector name alone<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. <\/b> The appliance’s SNMP community string<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. <\/b> The DLP dictionary description<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 1. Repeated delivery attempts between the same destinations in message and mail-flow logs<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation :-<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          A mail loop occurs when mail is repeatedly routed between systems instead of reaching its intended final destination. Repeated delivery attempts between the same systems, recurring routing decisions, and corresponding message-tracking or mail-flow log entries can provide strong evidence of such a loop. Administrators should examine routing configuration, destination policies, connectors, and SMTP logs to identify where the message is being redirected. DKIM selectors, SNMP community strings, and DLP dictionary descriptions do not establish mail-routing behavior. Detailed mail-flow evidence is therefore essential when diagnosing a suspected routing loop.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-720 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps   Question 281. An administrator wants to ensure that an inbound message cannot be accepted unless the recipient domain is configured as a valid destination on the Cisco Secure Email Gateway. Which feature provides this control? Advanced Malware Protection Recipient Access Table Outbreak […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21730"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21730"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21731,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21730\/revisions\/21731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}