{"id":22205,"date":"2026-09-25T11:40:39","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T11:40:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=22205"},"modified":"2026-09-25T11:40:39","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T11:40:39","slug":"isaca-cism-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part10-q181-200","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/isaca-cism-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part10-q181-200\/","title":{"rendered":"Isaca CISM Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part10 Q181-200"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/cism-exam-dumps\"><b>Isaca CISM Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 181<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the PRIMARY purpose of an information security program roadmap?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To document employee attendance<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To define the sequence and timing of major security initiatives<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To replace the organization&#8217;s security policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To list every technical vulnerability<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An information security program roadmap provides a structured view of planned security initiatives, priorities, dependencies, and expected timing. It helps management understand how the program will progress toward strategic objectives and how resources should be allocated over time. A roadmap does not replace security policies or function as a vulnerability inventory. It should reflect business priorities, risk exposure, regulatory requirements, available resources, and organizational capabilities. By establishing a coordinated sequence of initiatives, the roadmap helps prevent fragmented investments and allows management to track progress toward the desired security program state.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 182<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which factor should MOST influence the prioritization of security initiatives?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Business risk and strategic objectives<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The newest available technology<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The number of vendors promoting a solution<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The personal preference of the security administrator<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security initiatives should be prioritized according to their contribution to business objectives, reduction of significant risks, regulatory requirements, and organizational priorities. New technology may provide useful capabilities, but novelty alone does not establish business value. Vendor marketing and individual preferences should not determine enterprise priorities. A risk-based prioritization approach considers potential impact, likelihood, urgency, dependencies, available resources, and expected benefits. This helps management direct funding and personnel toward initiatives that address important exposures or enable strategic objectives. It also provides a defensible basis for explaining why some security projects should be completed before others.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 183<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security program has more initiatives than available resources. What should the CISM do?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Start every initiative with minimal resources<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Prioritize initiatives according to risk, business value, and strategic requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Select projects randomly<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Delay all initiatives until additional funding appears<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When resources are limited, the CISM should use a structured prioritization process based on business risk, strategic objectives, regulatory obligations, dependencies, urgency, and expected security benefits. Starting every project with insufficient resources can result in delays, weak implementation, and ineffective controls. Random selection provides no defensible basis for investment decisions. Waiting for unlimited funding may also leave important risks untreated. Prioritization allows management to identify which initiatives are most important, determine what can be deferred, and communicate resource constraints clearly. This approach supports realistic planning and keeps the security program aligned with organizational needs.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 184<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which activity BEST supports effective security program governance?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Periodic review of program performance against approved objectives<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allowing each security team to define unrelated objectives<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Avoiding management reporting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Changing objectives whenever a minor incident occurs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Periodic review of program performance against approved objectives helps management determine whether the security program is delivering its intended outcomes. Reviews can examine risk trends, control effectiveness, resource use, strategic progress, incidents, compliance, and performance measures. Allowing teams to establish unrelated objectives can create fragmentation, while avoiding management reporting reduces oversight. Security objectives should not be changed simply because of every minor incident; meaningful changes should be based on evidence, risk analysis, business priorities, and changes in the operating environment. Governance reviews provide an opportunity to identify gaps and make informed adjustments to the program.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 185<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What should a security program charter primarily establish?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The authority, scope, responsibilities, and objectives of the program<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The password of every employee<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The configuration of every firewall<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The source code of security applications<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A security program charter formally establishes the program&#8217;s purpose, scope, authority, responsibilities, objectives, and relationship with other organizational functions. It provides a governance foundation for determining what the program is expected to accomplish and who is accountable for major activities. Detailed passwords, firewall configurations, and application source code belong in operational or technical documentation and should not be part of a program charter. A clear charter can also help establish management sponsorship and clarify decision-making authority. This reduces ambiguity and provides a reference point for evaluating whether program activities remain aligned with organizational expectations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 186<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which approach is MOST appropriate when defining security program objectives?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Make them measurable and aligned with business and risk requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Keep them intentionally vague<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Base them only on security technology capabilities<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Change them every month without management approval<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security program objectives should be clearly defined, measurable where practical, and aligned with organizational business objectives, risk requirements, compliance obligations, and security strategy. Measurable objectives allow management to determine whether desired outcomes are being achieved and whether resources are being used effectively. Vague objectives make performance difficult to evaluate and can create inconsistent expectations. Technology capabilities may support objectives but should not define them independently of business requirements. Objectives should also remain stable enough to provide direction while being reviewed and adjusted through appropriate governance when significant changes occur.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 187<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security program objective cannot be measured with the current data. What should the CISM do?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Define an appropriate measurement method and data source<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remove the objective immediately<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Report that the objective has been achieved<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use an unrelated metric because data is available<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If an objective is important but cannot currently be measured, the CISM should identify an appropriate measurement method and determine what data is required to support it. This may involve improving data collection, defining new metrics, establishing baselines, or modifying processes so that meaningful evidence becomes available. Removing the objective simply because measurement is difficult may weaken the program. Reporting achievement without evidence is misleading, while using an unrelated metric can create a false impression of performance. Effective measurement should provide reliable information about progress and outcomes and should remain aligned with the original security objective.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 188<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which practice BEST helps maintain security knowledge when key personnel leave the organization?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Knowledge transfer and documented procedures<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Restricting all information to one administrator<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Avoiding documentation to save time<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removing backup personnel<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Knowledge transfer and appropriate documentation reduce dependence on individual employees and help maintain operational continuity when personnel leave or change roles. Important knowledge can include procedures, system dependencies, security processes, contacts, escalation paths, configurations, and decision criteria. Concentrating knowledge in one administrator creates a single point of failure and can make recovery difficult. Documentation should be supplemented by cross-training and practical knowledge transfer because documents alone may not capture all operational expertise. Succession planning and backup responsibilities further strengthen resilience by ensuring that critical security activities can continue when key personnel are unavailable.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 189<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>An organization depends heavily on one security specialist for a critical process. What should the CISM address?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Key-person dependency and continuity risk<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The specialist&#8217;s preferred software brand<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The office location of the specialist<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The number of meetings attended by the specialist<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Heavy dependence on one individual creates key-person risk because the organization may be unable to perform critical activities if that person becomes unavailable. The CISM should assess the dependency and establish appropriate continuity measures such as cross-training, documented procedures, backup responsibilities, succession planning, and knowledge transfer. The goal is not to eliminate the specialist&#8217;s role but to ensure that critical security capabilities remain available. Key-person dependencies should be considered as part of operational resilience and resource planning. Addressing them also reduces the risk that security processes will be delayed or disrupted during unexpected personnel changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 190<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the PRIMARY purpose of segregation of duties?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To prevent one individual from controlling incompatible activities<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To increase the number of administrative accounts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To eliminate all security monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To give managers unrestricted access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Segregation of duties reduces the risk of fraud, misuse, and unauthorized activity by ensuring that incompatible responsibilities are divided among different individuals or functions. For example, the person who approves a sensitive transaction should not necessarily be the same person who executes and independently verifies it. Segregation does not eliminate the need for monitoring and should not be confused with simply increasing the number of accounts. Organizations should identify conflicting duties based on business processes and risk. Where staffing limitations prevent complete separation, compensating controls such as independent review or enhanced monitoring may be appropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 191<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which situation represents a segregation-of-duties concern?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The same employee requests, approves, and implements a high-risk access change<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An employee submits a support ticket<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A manager reviews a security report<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A user changes a permitted application setting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allowing one individual to request, approve, and implement a high-risk access change concentrates incompatible responsibilities and can enable unauthorized activity without independent oversight. Separating these functions provides checks and balances and makes inappropriate changes more difficult to conceal. The appropriate separation depends on the organization&#8217;s processes and risk level. Where complete separation is impractical, compensating controls such as independent approval, detailed logging, or periodic review may reduce the risk. Segregation of duties should be incorporated into role design and access governance rather than addressed only after an incident or audit finding occurs.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 192<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the PRIMARY purpose of security awareness training?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To help personnel understand and apply required secure behaviors<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To replace technical security controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To make employees responsible for all security decisions<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To eliminate the need for security policies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security awareness training helps personnel understand security expectations and apply appropriate behaviors in their daily activities. It can address topics such as phishing, data handling, authentication, reporting procedures, acceptable use, social engineering, and organizational policies. Training does not replace technical controls or transfer all security responsibility to employees. It should complement governance, processes, technology, and management practices. Effective awareness programs should be tailored to different audiences and evaluated using appropriate outcome measures. The objective is not merely to confirm attendance but to improve understanding, decision-making, reporting, and adherence to required security practices.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 193<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which approach is MOST appropriate for training employees with different security responsibilities?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use identical content for every role<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tailor training to job responsibilities and associated risks<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Train only technical employees<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Provide training only after incidents occur<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security training should be tailored to the responsibilities and risks associated with different roles. Executives may need training focused on governance and decision-making, privileged administrators may require stronger technical and access-management guidance, and employees handling sensitive information may need detailed data protection requirements. Identical content for every audience can reduce relevance and effectiveness. Training only technical staff ignores significant human and business risks. Waiting for incidents is also reactive. Role-based awareness improves the likelihood that employees will recognize relevant threats, follow appropriate procedures, and understand how their specific responsibilities contribute to organizational security.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 194<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A phishing simulation shows that many employees still enter credentials into fraudulent pages. What should the CISM evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The awareness program&#8217;s effectiveness and underlying behavioral causes<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether phishing should be ignored<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether all email should be permanently disabled<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether employees should be punished automatically<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A high failure rate in a phishing simulation indicates that the organization should evaluate the effectiveness of its awareness program and understand why employees are still engaging in risky behavior. The CISM may review training content, message relevance, role-specific risks, reporting processes, technical protections, management support, and repeated behavioral patterns. The objective should be measurable improvement rather than simply increasing training volume. Technical controls such as email filtering can complement awareness efforts. Corrective actions should be proportionate and supported by organizational policies. Simulation results can provide valuable evidence for improving both human and technical defenses.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 195<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which control MOST directly reduces the risk of unauthorized administrative access?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Privileged access management<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Public website advertising<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Data archiving<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Employee satisfaction surveys<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Privileged access management helps control, monitor, and govern accounts with elevated permissions. Depending on the implementation, it may support approval workflows, credential protection, session monitoring, time-limited access, password rotation, and detailed logging. These capabilities reduce the risk associated with powerful administrative accounts. Data archiving and employee surveys do not directly control privileged access, while advertising has no meaningful access-management function. Privileged access should also follow least privilege and segregation-of-duties principles. Periodic reviews should verify that elevated permissions remain necessary and that administrative activity can be appropriately attributed and investigated.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 196<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A privileged user requests permanent administrator access for convenience. What should the CISM recommend?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Grant permanent access because the user is experienced<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Evaluate the business need and apply least privilege with appropriate approval<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Grant access without logging<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Give the same privilege to all employees<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Permanent privileged access should not be granted simply for convenience. The CISM should ensure that the business need is understood and that access is limited according to least privilege and established authorization requirements. Where practical, temporary or just-in-time privileged access may reduce exposure while still allowing administrators to perform necessary tasks. Appropriate monitoring and logging should also be applied. Experience or seniority does not automatically justify unrestricted privileges. The objective is to balance operational requirements with security risk by ensuring that elevated access is necessary, authorized, appropriately controlled, and periodically reviewed.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 197<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which activity BEST supports secure disposal of sensitive information?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Following approved disposal procedures appropriate to the information and storage medium<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allowing employees to discard information informally<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Keeping all information forever<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Moving sensitive data to an unknown personal device<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sensitive information should be disposed of according to approved procedures that consider its classification, legal and regulatory requirements, retention obligations, and the characteristics of the storage medium. Appropriate methods may include secure deletion, cryptographic erasure, physical destruction, or other approved techniques depending on the circumstances. Informal disposal can expose information to unauthorized parties, while retaining everything indefinitely can increase security, privacy, and compliance risks. Moving information to an unknown personal device does not constitute secure disposal. Effective information lifecycle management ensures that data is retained when required and securely disposed of when the retention period ends.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 198<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security program has strong technical controls but employees frequently bypass them to complete work faster. What should the CISM examine?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The relationship between security controls, business processes, usability, and organizational culture<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Only the employees&#8217; technical skills<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether additional controls should always be added<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether all business processes should be stopped<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Repeated control bypasses may indicate that security requirements are poorly integrated with business processes or that controls create unnecessary operational friction. The CISM should examine usability, process design, incentives, management expectations, awareness, control effectiveness, and whether the security requirement is appropriately designed for the business context. Adding more controls without understanding the cause may increase complexity and encourage further circumvention. Stopping business processes is generally disproportionate. Effective security should support business objectives while managing risk. Understanding why employees bypass controls can reveal opportunities for automation, process improvement, better training, or control redesign.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 199<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which factor is MOST important when selecting security awareness content?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The risks and behaviors relevant to the target audience<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The number of slides available<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The vendor&#8217;s preferred presentation format<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The length of the employee handbook<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Awareness content should focus on risks and behaviors that are relevant to the audience receiving the training. Employees are more likely to apply guidance when they understand how security requirements relate to their actual responsibilities and common threats. For example, administrators may need specialized guidance about privileged access, while general employees may require stronger emphasis on phishing, data handling, and reporting suspicious activity. Slide count and presentation format may affect delivery but do not determine content relevance. Awareness programs should also use performance and behavioral results to refine content and address areas where employees continue to demonstrate weaknesses.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 200<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>A security program review shows that several objectives are being met, but risk exposure remains above management&#8217;s tolerance. What should the CISM do?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Report the remaining exposure and reassess whether additional treatment is required<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Declare the program completely successful<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remove the affected risks from the risk register<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stop measuring security objectives<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Meeting defined security objectives does not automatically mean that all organizational risks are within acceptable limits. If significant residual exposure remains above management&#8217;s tolerance, the CISM should communicate the situation clearly and reassess whether additional treatment, resources, control changes, risk transfer, avoidance, or formally authorized acceptance is appropriate. Removing the risks from the register would obscure the actual exposure, while stopping measurement would weaken governance. Management should understand both program performance and remaining risk because these are related but distinct concepts. Effective security governance ensures that achievement of program activities does not substitute for appropriate management of residual business risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Isaca CISM Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 181 What is the PRIMARY purpose of an information security program roadmap? To document employee attendance To define the sequence and timing of major security initiatives To replace the organization&#8217;s security policy To list every technical vulnerability Correct Answer: 2 Explanation An information [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22205"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22206,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22205\/revisions\/22206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}