{"id":22441,"date":"2026-09-26T04:46:44","date_gmt":"2026-09-26T04:46:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=22441"},"modified":"2026-09-26T04:46:44","modified_gmt":"2026-09-26T04:46:44","slug":"asis-psp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/asis-psp-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160\/","title":{"rendered":"ASIS PSP Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part8 Q141-160"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/psp-exam-dumps\"><b>ASIS PSP Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 141.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security professional is evaluating an entrance where employees frequently experience long delays during shift changes. What is the best approach?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove authentication requirements during peak periods<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evaluate throughput, authentication requirements, staffing, equipment capacity, and risk to improve flow without weakening necessary controls<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep every entrance permanently open<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Require employees to arrive several hours early<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Access control should provide appropriate protection while supporting legitimate operational needs. Excessive delays can encourage employees to bypass controls, hold doors open, or develop other insecure workarounds. The security professional should measure peak traffic, determine required authentication strength, evaluate reader and turnstile capacity, and consider staffing or entrance configuration. The objective is not simply to maximize speed but to achieve required security at an acceptable throughput. Testing proposed changes during realistic peak periods can confirm whether both operational and security requirements are satisfied.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 142.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the primary purpose of a layered perimeter protection strategy?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To create multiple opportunities to deter, detect, assess, delay, and respond to unauthorized activity<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To guarantee that the outermost barrier cannot be defeated<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To eliminate the need for interior security controls<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To place every security device at the same location<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Layered perimeter protection avoids depending on a single barrier or technology. Different measures can contribute deterrence, detection, assessment, delay, and response at different points along an adversary&#8217;s potential path. For example, fencing may define and delay, sensors may detect, cameras may support assessment, and responders may intervene. The exact layers should reflect the site&#8217;s risk, geography, operations, and assets. Multiple layers are valuable when they work together toward defined protection objectives rather than simply increasing the number of installed devices.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 143.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A facility&#8217;s access control database contains hundreds of active credentials assigned to individuals whose employment status cannot be confirmed. What should the security manager do?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Leave all credentials active to avoid inconvenience<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the entire access database<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reconcile active credentials with authoritative personnel and authorization records and address unexplained access promptly<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Issue duplicate credentials to all users<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An access-control database should accurately reflect currently authorized individuals. Unexplained active credentials may represent former employees, expired contractors, duplicate identities, or administrative errors and can create significant unauthorized-access exposure. Security should reconcile records with appropriate authoritative sources such as human resources, contractor management, or departmental authorization information. Questionable credentials should be investigated and handled according to established procedures. Regular reconciliation complements event-driven termination processes and helps prevent obsolete access privileges from accumulating over time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 144.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security system depends on communication between remote sensors and a central monitoring station. What should be considered if the communication path fails?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only sensor appearance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Employee parking arrangements<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The number of control-room chairs<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Failure detection, alternate communications, local alarm behavior, continuity procedures, and required restoration time<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A sensor provides limited protection if its alarms cannot reach personnel who can assess and respond. Security design should therefore address communication failures as part of system resilience. Depending on risk, measures might include supervised communications, redundant paths, local alarm storage, alternate networks, or temporary procedures. Personnel should know how communication failures are identified and escalated. Restoration requirements should reflect the importance of the affected security functions. Periodic testing helps verify that backup arrangements actually work when the primary path is unavailable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 145.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why should security risk assessments document important assumptions?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Changes in assumptions can alter risk conclusions and may trigger reassessment or different security decisions.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assumptions are always permanent facts.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Documenting assumptions eliminates uncertainty.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assumptions replace threat information.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk assessments often depend on assumptions about occupancy, threat capability, response time, system availability, asset value, operating conditions, or future activities. If these assumptions are not documented, decision-makers may not understand the basis of the assessment. An assumption that later proves incorrect can materially change risk. Recording significant assumptions makes the analysis more transparent and helps identify when reassessment is necessary. Assumptions should be validated where practical and monitored when they have an important influence on security decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 146.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A facility wants to strengthen protection against unauthorized use of employee access cards. Which measure would provide stronger authentication?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Printing larger photographs on every wall<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Requiring a credential together with an additional authentication factor where justified by risk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Removing credential expiration dates<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allowing departments to share credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A physical access card can be lost, stolen, loaned, or copied depending on the technology. Requiring another authentication factor, such as a PIN or suitable biometric, can increase assurance that the individual using the credential is authorized. Stronger authentication may not be necessary at every doorway because it can affect cost and throughput. It is often most appropriate for higher-risk areas. Selection should consider security requirements, usability, privacy, environmental conditions, failure modes, and procedures for legitimate exceptions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 147.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security professional discovers that an exterior wall contains an unsecured ventilation opening large enough for unauthorized entry. What should this condition be treated as?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A minor aesthetic issue<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> An employee training issue only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A penetration vulnerability in the protected boundary<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A risk transfer method<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Openings for ventilation, utilities, drainage, and other building services can create unintended entry routes if they are large enough or insufficiently protected. A physical security assessment should examine these penetrations as part of the complete protective boundary. Appropriate measures might include grilles, barriers, detection, surveillance, or other controls consistent with ventilation, fire, maintenance, and operational requirements. Protecting doors while ignoring accessible penetrations can create an easily exploited bypass. Security design should therefore account for all credible routes into protected areas.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 148.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A high-security facility is evaluating a new perimeter fence. What is the best way to determine whether the proposed design provides sufficient delay?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Select the tallest fence available without analysis<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rely solely on manufacturer advertising<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assume all fences provide equal delay<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evaluate the fence against credible adversary methods, tools, site conditions, detection, and required response timeline<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Barrier effectiveness depends on the adversary, available tools, construction, installation, terrain, and surrounding conditions. A fence that significantly delays one type of intruder may provide little delay against another. The required performance should therefore be connected to credible threat scenarios and the overall detection-response timeline. Security professionals should also consider bypass routes such as gates, drainage features, adjacent structures, or terrain. Delay is useful when it provides responders sufficient additional time to interrupt an adversary before the protected objective is reached.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 149.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>What is an important benefit of documenting security system configuration changes?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It supports accountability, troubleshooting, testing, recovery, and understanding of the system&#8217;s current state.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It prevents every equipment failure.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates the need for access controls on administrative functions.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It guarantees configuration changes are always correct.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Security systems evolve as devices are added, permissions change, software is updated, or configurations are modified. Documenting significant changes creates a reliable history that can help troubleshoot failures, investigate unexpected behavior, restore known configurations, and support audits. Changes should be authorized and tested according to their potential impact. Documentation is particularly important when multiple administrators or contractors maintain the system. Uncontrolled changes can introduce vulnerabilities or make it difficult to determine why a previously functioning security capability no longer performs as expected.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 150.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security manager is evaluating the effectiveness of guard patrols. Which method provides the most useful information?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Count only the total number of officers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evaluate patrol completion, coverage, observations, incident detection, response performance, route appropriateness, and relevant trends<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Measure only the distance officers walk<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Evaluate uniform appearance alone<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Patrol effectiveness depends on what officers accomplish rather than simply how far they travel or how many personnel are scheduled. Relevant information can include whether critical locations are covered, whether inspections are completed, what conditions officers identify, how incidents are handled, and whether routes reflect current risks. Electronic tour systems can document patrol activity but should not reduce patrols to mechanical checkpoint scanning. Management should periodically review patrol objectives and modify routes, frequency, or procedures when facility conditions or risk priorities change.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 151.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security professional finds that a camera covering a cash-handling area records images at insufficient quality for the required investigative purpose. What should be done?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep the system unchanged because recording exists<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Add more storage without changing image quality<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reassess camera placement, field of view, resolution, lighting, compression, and other factors against the defined surveillance objective<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove access controls from the area<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Video should be designed according to the task it must support. Merely having a recorded image does not mean the image is useful for identification, recognition, assessment, or investigation. The professional should compare actual image performance with the required objective and evaluate camera position, target size, lighting, resolution, compression, focus, and recording settings. Improvements should address the actual performance deficiency rather than simply increasing equipment quantity. Testing with realistic subjects and operating conditions can confirm whether revised coverage satisfies requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 152.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>An organization plans to install a new perimeter detection system while keeping its existing response staffing unchanged. What should be verified?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether the new sensors are a different color<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether the system has more features than competitors<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether employees approve of the brand<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether detection, assessment, delay, communications, and existing response times together provide effective protection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Improved detection does not automatically produce effective protection. The organization should determine whether alarms can be assessed promptly and whether responders can reach the relevant location before an adversary achieves the objective. Existing barriers and other delay measures influence this timeline. If detection improves but response remains too slow, additional changes may be necessary. Security professionals should therefore evaluate the complete protection system rather than assuming that upgrading one component resolves weaknesses elsewhere in the detection-delay-response sequence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 153.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Why should sensitive security drawings and system diagrams be protected from unnecessary disclosure?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> They may reveal protective measures, equipment locations, dependencies, or vulnerabilities that could assist unauthorized activity.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> All facility drawings must always be destroyed.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Drawings are useful only during construction.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Security personnel should never have access to diagrams.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Detailed security drawings can reveal camera locations, sensor coverage, access-control infrastructure, communication routes, control rooms, or other information that could be misused. Access should therefore be limited according to legitimate business need and organizational information-protection requirements. At the same time, authorized designers, operators, maintainers, and emergency personnel may require appropriate access. The objective is controlled availability rather than eliminating documentation. Secure storage, distribution, revision control, and disposal help preserve the value of documentation while reducing unnecessary exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 154.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security manager is planning an exercise for an intrusion scenario. What should be established before conducting the exercise?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The desired outcome should always be kept secret from all controllers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Objectives, scenario boundaries, participant roles, safety controls, evaluation criteria, and exercise communications<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only the exercise date<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A requirement that participants never make mistakes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A useful security exercise requires clear objectives and controlled execution. Planners should determine what capabilities are being tested, establish realistic scenario boundaries, define participant and controller responsibilities, protect safety, and identify how performance will be evaluated. Exercise communications should prevent simulated events from being mistaken for actual emergencies. The purpose is to identify strengths and improvement opportunities, not to create artificial success. After the exercise, observations should be documented and appropriate corrective actions assigned and followed through to completion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 155.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A facility manager proposes placing large decorative objects directly beside a secure perimeter fence. What should the security professional evaluate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only whether the objects improve appearance<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether employees like the objects<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Whether the objects create climbing assistance, concealment, surveillance obstruction, or other security vulnerabilities<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only their purchase price<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Objects near a perimeter can unintentionally reduce barrier effectiveness. Large structures may provide climbing assistance, conceal individuals, block cameras, interfere with lighting, or create maintenance problems. The security professional should assess how proposed landscaping, artwork, storage, dumpsters, vehicles, and other objects interact with the protective system. Security considerations can often be incorporated without eliminating architectural or aesthetic objectives. Reviewing environmental changes before installation is generally easier and less expensive than correcting newly created vulnerabilities afterward.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 156.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A company wants to remotely unlock doors from its security operations center. Which requirement is most important?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Every door should be remotely unlockable without restriction<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Operators should share one account<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remote actions should never be recorded<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Strong operator authorization, appropriate verification, event logging, defined procedures, and secure system operation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Remote door control can support efficient operations and emergency response, but unauthorized or mistaken commands can create significant exposure. Operators should be individually authenticated and authorized according to their responsibilities. Procedures should define when remote release is appropriate and what verification is required. Actions should be logged for accountability and investigation. The underlying system and communications should also be appropriately protected. Higher-risk openings may require additional confirmation or restrictions rather than permitting unrestricted remote control of every door.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 157.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the primary reason to periodically test backup batteries used by security equipment?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Battery capacity can deteriorate over time, leaving equipment unable to operate for the required duration during a power outage.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Batteries never deteriorate if they are installed indoors.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Testing eliminates the need for replacement.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Backup batteries are used only during system installation.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Battery condition can degrade because of age, temperature, charging conditions, usage, or equipment problems. A battery may appear normal while providing far less runtime than required. Periodic inspection and appropriate testing help determine whether backup power can sustain critical security functions during an outage. Replacement intervals should consider manufacturer guidance and actual operating conditions. Security continuity planning should also account for how long primary power may be unavailable and whether additional backup sources are necessary for critical systems.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 158.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security professional is evaluating two locations for a new guard station. What should most strongly influence the choice?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Which location has more comfortable furniture<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Visibility, access-control responsibilities, responder movement, communications, officer safety, and required security functions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Which location is closest to the cafeteria<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Which location has the largest window<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A guard station should support the security functions assigned to personnel. The location may need to provide observation of entrances, rapid access to response routes, communication capability, protection for officers, and appropriate interaction with visitors or employees. Environmental and ergonomic factors matter, but they should support rather than undermine operational requirements. The security professional should evaluate normal operations as well as emergencies. A poorly positioned station can create blind spots, slow response, or expose officers unnecessarily even when staffing levels are adequate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 159.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A facility introduces a new high-value production process in an area previously classified as low risk. What should the security manager do?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep existing controls permanently because the building has not changed<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Wait for a theft before changing security<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reassess asset criticality, threats, vulnerabilities, consequences, access needs, and required protection for the changed area<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Install cameras without conducting any analysis<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk can change even when the physical building remains unchanged. Introducing high-value assets or critical operations can increase consequences and attract different threats. Existing access control, barriers, surveillance, detection, procedures, and response arrangements may no longer be proportionate to the new exposure. The security manager should reassess the area and determine whether changes are justified. Significant changes in assets, processes, occupancy, or operations are common triggers for security reassessment rather than waiting for the normal review schedule.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 160.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A security project has been operating for several months after installation. What should the security manager do to verify that expected security benefits are being sustained?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review only the original purchase order<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assume acceptance testing proves permanent effectiveness<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Measure only how many devices remain installed<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review performance data, incidents, maintenance, user behavior, testing results, and current risks against defined objectives<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Acceptance testing confirms performance at a particular point, but security effectiveness can change as equipment ages, users adapt, operations evolve, and threats change. A post-implementation review should examine whether controls continue to perform as expected and whether the original security objectives are being achieved. Incident trends, maintenance records, alarm performance, response data, user behavior, testing, and updated risk information can provide useful evidence. Findings can identify opportunities for adjustment before small performance problems develop into significant vulnerabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ASIS PSP Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 141. A security professional is evaluating an entrance where employees frequently experience long delays during shift changes. What is the best approach? Remove authentication requirements during peak periods 2. Evaluate throughput, authentication requirements, staffing, equipment capacity, and risk to improve flow without weakening [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22441"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22441"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22441\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22442,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22441\/revisions\/22442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}