{"id":22714,"date":"2026-09-26T07:21:24","date_gmt":"2026-09-26T07:21:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=22714"},"modified":"2026-09-26T07:21:24","modified_gmt":"2026-09-26T07:21:24","slug":"pecb-lead-auditor-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/pecb-lead-auditor-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400\/","title":{"rendered":"PECB Lead Auditor Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part20 Q381-400"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>PECB Lead Auditor Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 381<\/b><\/h3>\n

What should an auditor verify when reviewing the competence records of audit team members?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Whether every auditor has identical qualifications<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Whether competence is relevant to assigned audit responsibilities<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Whether records contain the highest number of certificates<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Whether all auditors have the same years of experience<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Audit team competence should be appropriate to the responsibilities assigned during the engagement. The auditor or audit program manager may review qualifications, training, experience, knowledge, skills, and evidence of previous audit performance. Having numerous certificates does not automatically demonstrate competence for a particular audit subject. Similarly, auditors do not need identical backgrounds if the combined team possesses the capabilities required by the audit. Competence records should therefore be evaluated against the audit scope, objectives, criteria, and complexity. Appropriate assignment helps ensure that auditors can collect, evaluate, and report evidence effectively while maintaining professional standards.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 382<\/b><\/h3>\n

    What should an auditor do when an auditee requests that a sensitive finding be discussed privately after the closing meeting?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Agree to remove the finding from the report<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Discuss it secretly without maintaining records<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Follow the established communication and confidentiality arrangements<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Allow only the auditee to determine the final conclusion<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Sensitive findings should be handled according to established audit communication and confidentiality arrangements. The auditor may need to discuss restricted information with authorized personnel in an appropriate setting, but confidentiality does not mean that valid findings should be removed or hidden from required reporting channels. The auditor should determine who is authorized to receive the information and ensure that appropriate records are maintained. If the request creates uncertainty about reporting responsibilities, the audit team should follow the agreed audit procedures or consult the appropriate audit authority. Proper handling protects sensitive information while preserving the integrity and traceability of audit results.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 383<\/b><\/h3>\n

      Which evidence would generally provide stronger support for verifying that a required activity was actually performed?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. An employee’s unsupported recollection<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. A promotional presentation<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. A current controlled record showing the activity and relevant authorization<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. An informal conversation unrelated to the activity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        A controlled record that directly demonstrates completion of a required activity can provide stronger evidence than an unsupported recollection or unrelated conversation. The auditor should still consider how the record was generated, whether it is complete, whether it can be traced to the activity, and whether it could have been altered without authorization. Evidence strength depends on relevance, reliability, and context rather than document format alone. Interviews and informal explanations can provide useful information, particularly for understanding circumstances, but significant conclusions should generally be supported through appropriate objective evidence. Corroboration may further strengthen the auditor’s assessment.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 384<\/b><\/h3>\n

        What should an auditor consider when an organization changes a key process shortly before the audit?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Whether the change affects audit objectives, risks, evidence availability, or planned activities<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Whether the auditor personally prefers the previous process<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Whether the change should automatically become a finding<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Whether the audit criteria should be replaced<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          A significant process change shortly before an audit may affect the relevance of the original audit plan and the evidence available for evaluation. The auditor should understand the nature and timing of the change and determine whether it affects the audit objectives, risks, criteria, sampling approach, or planned activities. The existence of a recent change does not automatically represent a nonconformity. The auditor should evaluate implementation and available evidence against applicable requirements. If the change creates an audit limitation or requires additional work, the audit team should manage the adjustment appropriately and communicate significant implications to relevant parties.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 385<\/b><\/h3>\n

          What is the main purpose of an audit plan?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. To replace the organization’s operational procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. To establish how the audit will be conducted within its objectives, scope, criteria, timing, and resources<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. To guarantee that no findings will be identified<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. To determine corrective actions in advance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            An audit plan provides a structured framework for conducting the audit. It normally addresses matters such as objectives, scope, criteria, timing, activities, responsibilities, resources, and relevant communication arrangements. The plan helps the audit team coordinate its work and ensures that available resources are directed toward the agreed objectives. It does not replace operational procedures or predetermine audit findings and corrective actions. Because circumstances may change during fieldwork, the plan may require controlled adjustments. A well-managed audit plan supports consistency and efficiency while maintaining sufficient flexibility to respond to relevant information discovered during the audit.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 386<\/b><\/h3>\n

            What should an auditor do if a finding is based on a requirement that has recently been withdrawn?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Continue using the withdrawn requirement without review<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Determine the applicable requirement for the relevant audit period and activity<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. Replace it with a personal expectation<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. Report the finding using any available requirement<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Audit findings must be evaluated against criteria that are applicable to the relevant audit scope and period. If a requirement has recently been withdrawn, the auditor should establish whether it was applicable when the audited activity occurred and whether another current requirement governs the activity. The timing and effective dates of changes may be important. An auditor should not apply a withdrawn requirement simply because it appears familiar, nor should personal expectations replace formal criteria. Reviewing applicable requirements carefully helps prevent findings based on outdated standards and ensures that conclusions are legally, contractually, or organizationally appropriate where relevant.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 387<\/b><\/h3>\n

              What should an auditor review when evaluating whether audit findings are consistently classified?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. The auditor’s personal preference<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. The length of each finding<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Established classification criteria and the evidence supporting each finding<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. The department’s opinion about severity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Consistent classification of findings requires the audit team to apply established criteria rather than personal preference or the opinions of individual departments. The auditor should examine the evidence, significance, extent, applicable requirements, and any established rules for categorizing findings. Team discussions or review procedures can help maintain consistency when similar conditions appear in different areas. Classification should not depend on how long a finding is written or whether management considers it serious. Applying defined criteria supports fairness and comparability across audit results. Where classification rules are unclear, the team should seek appropriate clarification before finalizing the report.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 388<\/b><\/h3>\n

                What should an auditor do when a required control exists but is performed inconsistently by different personnel?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Determine the extent and reason for the inconsistency using objective evidence<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Assume the control is effective because it exists<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Report every employee separately<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Rewrite the control personally<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  The existence of a documented control does not by itself demonstrate effective implementation. If personnel perform the control differently, the auditor should determine the extent of the variation, understand the reasons, and compare actual practices with the applicable criteria. Evidence may include observations, records, interviews, training information, and supervisory reviews. The inconsistency may result from unclear instructions, inadequate competence, local adaptations, or weak monitoring. The auditor should avoid automatically attributing the problem to individual employees. Understanding the broader condition helps determine whether the issue is isolated or systemic and supports an accurate finding based on evidence rather than assumption.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 389<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  What should an auditor consider when deciding whether additional sampling is necessary?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Whether the existing evidence is sufficient to support the conclusion and whether unresolved risk remains<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. Whether additional records are easy to access<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. Whether the audit team wants a longer report<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. Whether management requests more samples<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Additional sampling may be appropriate when existing evidence does not provide sufficient confidence in the audit conclusion or when significant uncertainty remains about the extent of a condition. The auditor should consider the audit objective, risk, population characteristics, initial results, consistency of evidence, and significance of the issue. More sampling is not automatically better; unnecessary expansion can consume resources without improving the conclusion. The decision should therefore be based on evidence needs and professional judgment. If initial sampling reveals a potentially broader problem, additional appropriate testing may help determine its extent and whether a finding is isolated or systemic.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 390<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    What should an auditor do if an interview reveals information about a process outside the agreed audit scope?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Automatically investigate the entire process<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Ignore the information under all circumstances<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Assess whether it has a material connection to the audit objectives or indicates a scope limitation<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Add the process to the report without evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Information discovered outside the agreed scope should be handled carefully. The auditor should determine whether it has a meaningful connection to an in-scope process, affects the achievement of audit objectives, or indicates a relevant risk or limitation. The auditor should not automatically expand the audit without authorization. If the information is unrelated, it may simply be recorded as background information or handled according to applicable procedures. If it has significant implications, the audit team may communicate the matter to the appropriate party and determine whether additional authorized work is necessary. This preserves scope discipline while avoiding the loss of important information.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 391<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      What should an auditor verify when reviewing access to confidential audit evidence?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Whether access is limited to authorized individuals with a legitimate need<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. Whether all employees can view the records<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. Whether the evidence is copied to personal devices<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. Whether confidential files are publicly available<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Confidential audit evidence should be protected through appropriate access controls. The auditor should consider whether only authorized individuals can view, modify, transmit, or otherwise handle sensitive records. Access should generally correspond to legitimate responsibilities and established confidentiality requirements. Depending on the environment, controls may include permissions, secure storage, encryption, authentication, controlled sharing, and monitoring. The objective is not merely to restrict access but to protect the integrity and confidentiality of audit information throughout its lifecycle. Effective controls reduce the risk of unauthorized disclosure and help maintain trust between the audit team, audit client, and audited organization.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 392<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        What should an auditor do when an audit team member lacks sufficient knowledge of a specialized technical area?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Assign the person all technical decisions<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. Ignore the knowledge gap<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. Obtain appropriate technical support or adjust responsibilities<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. Ask the auditee to approve the auditor’s conclusions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A competence gap in a specialized technical area should be addressed before it compromises audit quality. The team leader may assign the activity to another competent auditor, obtain support from a qualified technical expert, provide appropriate supervision, or otherwise adjust responsibilities. The exact approach depends on the audit objectives, scope, complexity, and available resources. The auditee may provide factual or technical information, but should not become responsible for determining the auditor’s conclusions. Managing competence gaps proactively helps ensure that technical evidence is evaluated correctly and that audit conclusions remain objective, reliable, and supported by appropriate expertise.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 393<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          What should an auditor examine when determining whether audit evidence is traceable?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Whether evidence can be linked to its source, activity, time, or relevant audit work<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. Whether the evidence has the largest file size<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. Whether the evidence was collected first<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. Whether every record contains the auditor’s signature<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Traceability allows audit evidence to be connected to its source and to the audit activity for which it was collected. Depending on the circumstances, useful identifiers may include dates, transaction references, process locations, document versions, system records, interviewees, or sampling details. Traceability helps auditors and reviewers understand how findings were developed and enables evidence to be retrieved if questions arise later. Not every piece of evidence needs an identical format or physical signature. The important consideration is whether the audit record provides enough information to establish a clear connection between evidence, criteria, findings, and conclusions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 394<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            What should an auditor do if a process appears effective but required monitoring records are consistently missing?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Ignore the missing records because the process works<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Evaluate the record requirement and determine whether the absence affects conformity or evidence availability<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Create replacement records<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Assume all missing records contain errors<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              A process may appear effective in practice while still failing a specific requirement to retain monitoring records. The auditor should determine what the applicable criteria require and whether the missing records represent a conformity issue. The auditor should also consider whether the absence of records limits the ability to demonstrate that monitoring occurred consistently. Evidence of actual performance may be relevant, but it does not automatically eliminate a separate record-retention requirement. The assessment should distinguish between failure to perform monitoring and failure to retain required evidence. This careful distinction supports accurate findings and avoids conclusions based solely on assumptions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 395<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              What should an auditor consider when an audit is conducted partly through remote methods?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Whether remote methods provide adequate access, communication, evidence, confidentiality, and observation capability<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Whether all remote activities are automatically equivalent to onsite activities<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. Whether remote audits require no planning<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. Whether screen sharing replaces all other evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Remote auditing can provide effective access to information, personnel, and systems, but its suitability depends on the audit objectives and circumstances. The auditor should consider connectivity, identity verification, confidentiality, document access, communication quality, system visibility, and the ability to observe relevant activities. Some activities may require additional methods or onsite verification if remote techniques cannot provide sufficient evidence. Remote methods should therefore be planned rather than treated as automatically equivalent to onsite work. The auditor should also protect sensitive information during screen sharing, file transfer, interviews, and electronic communication. Method selection should remain consistent with the audit objectives and criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 396<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                What should an auditor do when a process owner provides a corrective action plan without evidence of implementation?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Treat the plan as proof of completion<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. Determine what evidence is needed to verify implementation and effectiveness<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Close the finding immediately<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Remove the original finding<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  A corrective action plan describes what an organization intends to do, but it does not necessarily demonstrate that the action has been implemented. The auditor should identify appropriate evidence showing completion and, where required, effectiveness. Depending on the action, this may include revised records, implemented controls, training evidence, monitoring results, observations, or follow-up testing. The auditor should avoid closing the finding solely because management has submitted a detailed plan. Closure should be based on established criteria and objective evidence. This distinction ensures that corrective actions are assessed based on actual implementation and results rather than planned intentions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 397<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  What should an auditor evaluate when reviewing the independence of an internal audit function?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Whether auditors can perform their work without inappropriate influence over audit conclusions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. Whether internal auditors work in the same building<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. Whether auditors know the organization’s processes<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. Whether auditors attend management meetings<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Internal audit independence involves the ability of auditors to perform their responsibilities objectively without inappropriate influence over planning, evidence evaluation, findings, or conclusions. The auditor may review reporting relationships, role responsibilities, conflict-of-interest controls, assignment arrangements, and mechanisms for escalating concerns. Familiarity with organizational processes is not itself a lack of independence; knowledge can support effective auditing. The important issue is whether auditors can make professional judgments without improper pressure or responsibility for the activities they audit. Appropriate organizational arrangements help protect impartiality and increase confidence that internal audit results are based on evidence and established criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 398<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    What should an auditor do when two reliable sources provide different versions of the same event?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Select the version that supports the planned conclusion<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Identify the discrepancy and obtain further evidence before deciding<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Average the two versions<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Ignore both sources<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Conflicting information should be investigated rather than resolved according to the auditor’s preferred conclusion. The auditor should identify exactly what differs, evaluate the reliability and relevance of each source, and obtain additional evidence where necessary. The difference may result from timing, incomplete records, different definitions, system errors, or genuinely inconsistent practices. Additional interviews, records, system logs, or observations may help clarify the situation. The auditor should document significant discrepancies and explain how they were resolved. This approach supports professional skepticism and reduces the risk of reaching a conclusion based on incomplete or selectively chosen evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 399<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      What should an auditor verify when evaluating whether an audit report is distributed appropriately?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Whether the report is sent only through informal channels<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Whether distribution follows authorized recipients, confidentiality requirements, and established procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Whether every employee receives the complete report<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Whether the report is posted publicly<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Audit reports may contain sensitive findings, weaknesses, personal information, or other restricted material, so distribution should be controlled. The auditor should verify that reports are provided to authorized recipients according to established procedures and confidentiality requirements. Distribution controls may address electronic transmission, storage, access permissions, approved recipients, and handling of revised versions. Broad distribution is not automatically appropriate simply because it increases transparency. At the same time, withholding required information from authorized stakeholders can undermine the audit process. Appropriate distribution ensures that relevant decision-makers receive the results while reducing the risk of unauthorized disclosure or alteration.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 400<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        What should an auditor consider when evaluating whether an audit program should be modified for future audits?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Only whether the previous audit finished on schedule<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. Findings, risks, changes, performance information, feedback, resource issues, and lessons learned<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. Only the number of auditors available<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. Whether the previous report was visually attractive<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          An audit program should be improved using relevant information from completed audits and changes in the organization’s context. The responsible party may review recurring findings, emerging risks, changes in processes or requirements, audit performance, resource limitations, stakeholder feedback, and lessons learned. These inputs can indicate whether audit frequency, scope, methods, competence requirements, or resource allocation should be adjusted. Completing audits on schedule is useful but does not by itself demonstrate program effectiveness. Continuous improvement should be based on evidence and trends rather than isolated preferences. Reviewing program performance systematically helps ensure that future audits remain relevant, effective, and aligned with organizational needs.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full PECB Lead Auditor Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 381 What should an auditor verify when reviewing the competence records of audit team members? Whether every auditor has identical qualifications Whether competence is relevant to assigned audit responsibilities Whether records contain the highest number of certificates Whether all auditors have the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22714"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22714"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22715,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22714\/revisions\/22715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}