{"id":23124,"date":"2026-09-26T11:56:14","date_gmt":"2026-09-26T11:56:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=23124"},"modified":"2026-09-26T11:56:14","modified_gmt":"2026-09-26T11:56:14","slug":"acfe-cfe-fraud-prevention-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part3-q41-60","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/acfe-cfe-fraud-prevention-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part3-q41-60\/","title":{"rendered":"ACFE CFE &#8211; Fraud Prevention Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part3 Q41-60"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/cfe-fraud-prevention-exam-dumps\"><b>ACFE CFE &#8211; Fraud Prevention Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><br \/>\n<\/b><b>Question 41. What distinguishes occupational fraud from organizational crime<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Occupational fraud benefits the organization<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Organizational crime always involves customers<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Occupational fraud is committed against the employing organization<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Organizational crime cannot involve employees<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Occupational fraud is committed against the employing organization<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Occupational fraud generally involves an individual using an occupation for personal enrichment through deliberate misuse or misapplication of the employing organization&#8217;s resources or assets. Organizational crime differs because the unlawful conduct is performed for the benefit of the organization rather than primarily against it. Understanding this distinction helps fraud examiners identify who benefits from misconduct and how organizational incentives might affect behavior. The current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence blueprint specifically requires candidates to differentiate organizational crime from occupational crime as part of understanding financial crime.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 42. What is a common nonfinancial consequence of fraud<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Damage to reputation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Increased cash reserves<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Lower control risk<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Guaranteed market growth<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Damage to reputation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud can create significant consequences beyond direct monetary loss. Reputational damage can reduce customer confidence, harm relationships with investors and business partners, weaken employee morale, and make recruitment or financing more difficult. Organizations may also experience regulatory scrutiny, legal costs, operational disruption, and loss of public trust. The Fraud Examiners Manual specifically addresses the nonfinancial costs of financial crime because measuring fraud only by the amount stolen can substantially understate its overall impact. Fraud prevention programs should therefore consider both financial and broader organizational consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 43. Which condition can encourage organizational misconduct<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Independent oversight<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Effective reporting channels<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Strong ethical leadership<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Excessive pressure to meet unrealistic targets<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Excessive pressure to meet unrealistic targets<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unrealistic performance expectations can create pressure that encourages employees or managers to manipulate information or engage in improper conduct to achieve organizational goals. This risk becomes greater when leadership emphasizes results while ignoring how those results are achieved. The current CFE blueprint requires candidates to recognize how organizational behavior can encourage criminal conduct and to understand factors contributing to financial crime. Effective organizations balance performance expectations with ethical standards, realistic incentives, internal controls, and clear accountability for misconduct.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 44. What is the primary purpose of an effective audit committee<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Process daily transactions<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Provide independent oversight of reporting and controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace internal audit<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Manage payroll<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Provide independent oversight of reporting and controls<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An effective audit committee provides oversight of financial reporting, internal control, audit activities, and other significant governance matters. Its independence from operational management helps it challenge management decisions and evaluate concerns without being directly responsible for the activities under review. Effective committees should receive relevant information, understand key risks, and communicate with internal and external auditors. The current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence blueprint specifically includes best practices for audit committees within the Corporate Governance domain because strong governance can reduce opportunities for management misconduct.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 45. What is a core corporate governance principle<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Accountability<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Management secrecy<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Unlimited executive authority<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Elimination of board oversight<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Accountability<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Accountability is a fundamental principle of sound corporate governance. Individuals with authority should be responsible for their decisions and actions, and governance structures should provide mechanisms for oversight and appropriate challenge. Other important governance concepts include transparency, fairness, responsibility, and appropriate protection of stakeholder interests. Effective accountability reduces the chance that managers can exercise unchecked authority or override important controls without scrutiny. The current CFE examination specifically requires candidates to identify principles of corporate governance and understand how governance frameworks help combat fraud.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 46. Which organization is a source of corporate governance guidance<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> OSHA<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> OECD<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> FBI only<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> IRS only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. OECD<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development is one of the recognized sources of corporate governance guidance identified in the current CFE blueprint. Its corporate governance principles provide internationally recognized guidance concerning shareholder rights, board responsibilities, disclosure, transparency, and accountability. Fraud examiners do not need to treat one governance framework as universally binding, because legal and regulatory requirements differ across jurisdictions. However, recognizing major sources of governance guidance helps professionals understand commonly accepted principles used to strengthen oversight and reduce fraud risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 47. What is the purpose of a fraud risk register<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Record employee attendance<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Track customer complaints only<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Document identified fraud risks and responses<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace the general ledger<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Document identified fraud risks and responses<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A fraud risk register provides a structured record of identified fraud risks, their potential impact, relevant controls, responsible owners, and planned responses. It can support consistent risk assessment and monitoring by keeping fraud exposure visible to management and governance personnel. The register should be updated when business processes, systems, personnel, or external threats change. It does not eliminate fraud risk by itself, but it helps convert the fraud risk assessment into documented actions and responsibilities. Fraud risk assessment and fraud risk management are major topics in the current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence section.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 48. Who should normally own a specific fraud risk<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Any employee selected randomly<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The external auditor<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The customer<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Management responsible for the affected process<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Management responsible for the affected process<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud risks should normally be assigned to management personnel who have responsibility and authority over the affected process. Risk ownership creates accountability for evaluating exposure, implementing controls, monitoring changes, and responding when conditions become unacceptable. Internal audit can provide independent assurance regarding the risk management process but should not generally assume management&#8217;s operational responsibility for the risk. Clear ownership also makes it easier to track corrective actions and escalate unresolved issues. Fraud risk management is a dedicated topic within the current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence section.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 49. What should fraud risk identification consider<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only frauds that occurred previously<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Possible schemes even if they have never occurred<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only external fraud<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only financial statement fraud<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Possible schemes even if they have never occurred<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A useful fraud risk assessment should consider plausible fraud schemes based on the organization&#8217;s processes, assets, incentives, access, controls, and external environment. Limiting assessment only to frauds that have already happened can leave emerging or previously undetected risks unaddressed. Management should think about who could commit each scheme, how it might be concealed, what controls currently exist, and the potential consequences. The CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence section covers fraud risk assessment specifically because proactive identification is an essential step in effective fraud risk management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 50. What is the purpose of assessing fraud risk likelihood<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Estimate how probable a fraud scenario is<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Determine employee salaries<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Eliminate impact analysis<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Set audit fees<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Estimate how probable a fraud scenario is<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud risk assessments commonly consider both likelihood and impact. Likelihood evaluates how probable it is that a particular scheme could occur given the organization&#8217;s environment, incentives, access, and controls. Impact considers the potential consequences if the scheme occurs. Evaluating both helps management prioritize limited resources toward significant exposures rather than treating every possible fraud risk as equally important. The assessment should use reasonable judgment and available evidence rather than presenting uncertain estimates as absolute predictions. Fraud risk assessment is a major area of the current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence exam.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 51. Which response reduces fraud risk by changing a process<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk acceptance<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk transfer<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk mitigation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Risk ignorance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Risk mitigation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk mitigation involves taking action to reduce the likelihood or impact of a fraud risk. Examples include introducing stronger approvals, restricting system access, improving segregation of duties, adding monitoring, or redesigning a vulnerable process. Management might also accept, avoid, or transfer certain risks depending on circumstances. Mitigation is appropriate when the organization determines that existing residual risk exceeds an acceptable level and practical controls can reduce the exposure. Fraud risk management requires selecting responses that are proportionate to the identified risk rather than assuming every risk must be eliminated completely.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 52. What does risk acceptance mean<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Eliminating the risky activity<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Transferring all responsibility to auditors<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Adding unlimited controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Choosing to retain a known level of risk<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Choosing to retain a known level of risk<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk acceptance means management knowingly retains a level of fraud risk after evaluating its significance and existing controls. Some risks may be accepted because their likelihood or impact is low or because additional controls would cost more than the benefit they provide. Acceptance should be an informed decision rather than the result of ignoring the exposure. Management should still monitor accepted risks because changing conditions can make previously acceptable exposure more significant. Effective fraud risk management involves choosing appropriate responses rather than assuming all fraud risks can or should be completely eliminated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 53. What is the purpose of fraud risk monitoring<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Identify changes in risks and control effectiveness<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace all investigations<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Eliminate management responsibility<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Set employee compensation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Identify changes in risks and control effectiveness<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud risks change as organizations introduce new systems, employees, products, vendors, locations, and business models. Monitoring helps management determine whether existing controls remain effective and whether new risks have emerged. It can include transaction analysis, management review, control testing, hotline trends, internal audit findings, and periodic reassessment. A fraud risk assessment that is never revisited can quickly become outdated. Fraud risk management therefore requires ongoing monitoring and adjustment rather than a one time exercise completed only for compliance purposes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 54. Why should organizations perform vendor due diligence<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To eliminate all vendors<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To identify third party fraud and integrity risks<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To increase purchase prices<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To avoid contracts<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. To identify third party fraud and integrity risks<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Vendor due diligence can identify ownership concerns, conflicts of interest, sanctions issues, questionable reputation, unusual business history, or other warning signs before an organization enters or expands a relationship. Third parties can create fraud exposure through bribery, false billing, procurement manipulation, conflicts, or misuse of organizational information. Due diligence should be proportionate to the nature and risk of the relationship and should be followed by ongoing monitoring where appropriate. The Fraud Examiners Manual specifically includes managing third party fraud risks within fraud risk management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 55. What is the main goal of selling fraud prevention to management<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Demonstrate business value and gain support<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace governance oversight<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid discussing fraud risk<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Eliminate compliance responsibilities<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Demonstrate business value and gain support<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud prevention programs require resources, leadership commitment, and organizational cooperation. Selling fraud prevention to management means explaining why prevention is valuable in terms management understands, such as avoiding financial losses, protecting reputation, reducing disruption, meeting compliance expectations, and strengthening controls. The Fraud Examiners Manual specifically includes Selling Fraud Prevention to Management within the Fraud Prevention Programs section. Strong executive support can influence budgets, employee participation, policy enforcement, and organizational culture. A technically sound anti fraud program is unlikely to succeed if leadership treats fraud prevention as an unnecessary administrative burden.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 56. What should disciplinary actions for fraud violations be<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Hidden from policy<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Applied consistently<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Limited to junior staff<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Based on employee popularity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Applied consistently<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Consistent discipline reinforces the credibility of an organization&#8217;s ethics and anti fraud program. Employees are less likely to respect policies when senior or high performing personnel receive special treatment for similar violations. Discipline should reflect applicable laws, organizational policy, seriousness of misconduct, and relevant circumstances while being administered fairly. Consistency strengthens deterrence because employees can see that ethical expectations apply throughout the organization. Fraud prevention programs should therefore connect written rules with actual consequences rather than treating the code of conduct as symbolic guidance only.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 57. What should a fraud examiner do when evidence contradicts an initial theory<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Revise conclusions according to the evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore the contradictory evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Alter the evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Keep the original conclusion regardless<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1. Revise conclusions according to the evidence<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud examiners must remain objective and base conclusions on evidence rather than personal expectations or pressure to prove a predetermined theory. When evidence contradicts an initial assumption, the examiner should reconsider the theory and follow the facts. Confirmation bias can cause investigators to give excessive weight to information that supports their expectations while discounting conflicting evidence. Ethical fraud examination requires impartial judgment, professional skepticism, and willingness to change conclusions when the evidence demands it. Ethics for Fraud Examiners is a core topic in the current Fraud Prevention and Deterrence section.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 58. What should a fraud examiner protect when handling sensitive information<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Personal preference<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Confidentiality<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Marketing value<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Public disclosure<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2. Confidentiality<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraud examiners frequently obtain sensitive financial, personal, investigative, and business information. They should protect confidentiality and disclose information only when authorized or legally required. Inappropriate disclosure can harm individuals, compromise investigations, expose organizations to legal risk, and damage professional credibility. Confidentiality does not mean concealing misconduct from appropriate authorities or governance personnel. Instead, information should be handled carefully and shared through proper channels. Ethical considerations are a specific part of the current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence examination and an ongoing requirement for CFE credential holders.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 59. What is the main purpose of professional skepticism<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Assume everyone is dishonest<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reject all management explanations<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain a questioning and objective mindset<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Avoid gathering evidence<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3. Maintain a questioning and objective mindset<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Professional skepticism means maintaining an alert and questioning mindset while evaluating information and evidence objectively. It does not require assuming that every person is dishonest, but it does require avoiding unquestioning acceptance of explanations when circumstances suggest further inquiry is appropriate. Fraud can involve concealment, collusion, false documentation, and management override, so fraud professionals must consider whether evidence is consistent and reliable. A skeptical approach supports better fraud risk assessment, auditing, and investigation while remaining grounded in evidence rather than suspicion alone.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 60. What does the current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence section primarily examine<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only financial statement preparation<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only criminal prosecution<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only investigative interviewing<\/span><\/li>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Why fraud occurs and how organizations can prevent it<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4. Why fraud occurs and how organizations can prevent it<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The current CFE Fraud Prevention and Deterrence section focuses on why people commit fraud and the organizational practices used to prevent and manage it. The section covers financial crime, corporate governance, management and auditor responsibilities, fraud prevention programs, fraud risk assessment and management, and ethics for fraud examiners. Under the revised CFE Exam launched in June 2026, Fraud Prevention and Deterrence is one of three major examination sections and currently contains seventy questions with a ninety minute testing period.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full ACFE CFE &#8211; Fraud Prevention Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. Question 41. What distinguishes occupational fraud from organizational crime Occupational fraud benefits the organization Organizational crime always involves customers Occupational fraud is committed against the employing organization Organizational crime cannot involve employees Correct Answer: 3. Occupational fraud is committed against the employing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23124"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23124"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23125,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23124\/revisions\/23125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}