{"id":23910,"date":"2026-09-28T11:07:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T11:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=23910"},"modified":"2026-09-28T11:07:41","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T11:07:41","slug":"cisco-ccnp-data-center-300-635-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part13-q241-260","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-data-center-300-635-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part13-q241-260\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Data Center 300-635 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part13 Q241-260"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/300-635-exam-dumps\"><b>Cisco CCNP Data Center 300-635 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 241.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco ACI concept defines the complete hierarchical collection of managed objects represented by APIC?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Management Information Tree<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN Pool<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Endpoint Database only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Routing Information Base<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco ACI represents configuration and operational state through a hierarchical Management Information Tree, often called the MIT. Every configurable or observable element is represented as a managed object within this hierarchy. Tenants, VRFs, Bridge Domains, Application Profiles, Endpoint Groups, contracts, interface policies, and many other objects exist in this tree. Each managed object belongs to a class and has a Distinguished Name that reflects its location in the hierarchy. Understanding the MIT is important for API automation because REST requests, SDK operations, and object queries all interact with this underlying model.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 242.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which identifier describes only the local name of an ACI managed object relative to its parent?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DN<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> RN<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> UUID only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN ID<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Relative Name, or RN, identifies a managed object relative to its parent within the ACI object hierarchy. A Distinguished Name, or DN, represents the full path from the root of the Management Information Tree to the object. The DN is effectively built from a sequence of RNs. This distinction matters in automation because scripts may need to construct or parse object paths when creating child objects or navigating parent-child relationships. UUIDs and VLAN IDs serve different purposes and do not represent the object&#8217;s hierarchical naming relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 243.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which APIC API response element commonly contains the returned managed objects?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">imdata<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">payloadOnly<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">routeTable<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">cliOutput<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco APIC API responses commonly return managed-object data inside the <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">imdata<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> array. Each entry contains an object class and its attributes, and may also include child objects depending on the query. Automation scripts often parse the <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">imdata<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> array to find specific tenants, EPGs, interfaces, or other resources. Understanding the standard response structure makes it easier to validate results and handle cases where no objects are returned. The other terms listed are not the standard top-level structure used in typical APIC REST responses.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 244.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which value in a Cisco APIC API response commonly indicates the number of objects returned by a query?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">statusCode<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">objectCountOnly<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">dataLength<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">totalCount<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">APIC API responses commonly include <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">totalCount<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which indicates how many objects match or are returned by a query. Automation scripts can use this value to determine whether expected objects exist or to validate the scope of a class query. For example, a script may stop if <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">totalCount<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> unexpectedly indicates hundreds of objects when only one was expected. Response metadata should be validated before destructive operations because an overly broad query can create a large blast radius. The other values listed are not the standard APIC field used for this purpose.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 245.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco ACI automation method is best when a developer wants to work with Python objects that directly correspond to APIC managed-object classes?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cobra SDK<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Telnet only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> TFTP<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Syslog<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Cisco ACI Cobra SDK maps the ACI managed-object model into Python classes. Developers can create or query objects using Python abstractions instead of manually building every REST request and payload. This is particularly useful for complex workflows involving multiple parent-child objects because the SDK closely follows the ACI hierarchy. Telnet, TFTP, and Syslog are unrelated to object-oriented ACI configuration. The Cobra SDK does not eliminate the need to understand the underlying ACI model, because class relationships, DNs, and object attributes still determine how configuration is represented.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 246.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which API query type is most efficient when an automation script needs information about all objects in one ACI class?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Repeated DN queries<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Class query<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ICMP sweep<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ARP table query<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A class query retrieves multiple managed objects of the same ACI class in one request. This is usually more efficient than issuing separate Distinguished Name queries for every individual object. Class queries are useful for inventory, compliance, or discovery tasks, especially when combined with API filters that narrow the results. Repeated DN queries may be appropriate when only a few specific objects are known in advance, but they can become inefficient at scale. ICMP and ARP are unrelated to the APIC managed-object API.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 247.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A script needs to determine whether a particular ACI tenant already exists before creating it. Which automation approach best supports idempotency?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Create the tenant every time without checking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete all tenants before deployment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Query for the tenant first and create it only if absent<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Restart APIC before every run<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An idempotent workflow first checks the current state and performs a change only when necessary. Querying for the tenant before creating it avoids unnecessary operations and prevents duplicate or conflicting actions. This is a core principle in infrastructure automation because workflows may be rerun after partial failure or as part of regular compliance processes. Deleting all tenants would be destructive, while restarting APIC has no relationship to resource existence. State-aware automation is safer and more predictable than blindly issuing create operations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 248.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco UCS construct allows a server identity to be moved from one compatible physical server to another with minimal reconfiguration?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> BIOS setup only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN Pool<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ACI Application Profile<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Profile<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Cisco UCS Service Profile separates server identity and configuration from the underlying physical hardware. It can define UUID, MAC addresses, network connectivity, storage settings, boot order, firmware policy, and other operational parameters. Because the logical profile is separate from the physical server, it can be associated with another compatible server when hardware is replaced. This simplifies recovery and provisioning. VLAN Pools and Application Profiles belong to networking constructs, while BIOS setup alone does not provide the same abstraction and portability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 249.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco UCS concept is best for standardizing the creation of many similar Service Profiles?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Service Profile template<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ARP table<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Port channel<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Syslog facility<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Service Profile template provides a reusable standard for creating multiple Service Profiles with common settings and policy references. This reduces manual configuration and improves consistency across server deployments. Templates are especially valuable for automation because scripts can create or instantiate many profiles from one approved definition. Depending on the UCS configuration model, derived profiles may remain associated with the template or be independently instantiated. ARP tables, port channels, and Syslog facilities do not provide server-profile templating.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 250.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco UCS management interface traditionally exposes an XML-based managed-object API?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco APIC<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco UCS Manager<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco ISE<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco DNA Center only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco UCS Manager traditionally exposes an XML-based API built around a hierarchical managed-object model. Automation can query and modify UCS configuration by interacting with objects such as Service Profiles, policies, server inventory, and network definitions. Cisco UCS Python SDK and PowerTool can provide higher-level abstractions over the underlying API. APIC manages ACI, while ISE focuses on identity and network access control. Understanding the UCS Manager API is useful when building server automation workflows that require direct interaction with the UCS domain.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 251.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco tool is most appropriate for administrators who want to automate UCS Manager operations using PowerShell?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco UCS PowerTool<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cobra SDK<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> EEM<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> NETCONF only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco UCS PowerTool provides PowerShell cmdlets for managing UCS infrastructure programmatically. It can connect to UCS Manager, query inventory, configure policies, create Service Profiles, and automate repetitive operations. This is useful for organizations with existing PowerShell expertise. Cobra SDK is associated with Cisco ACI, EEM is an event-driven automation capability on supported Cisco devices, and NETCONF is a model-driven network management protocol. PowerTool gives administrators a familiar scripting interface over UCS managed objects.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 252.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco platform provides a cloud-based API-driven management model for supported UCS infrastructure?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco ISE<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Intersight<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco CUCM<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Expressway<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco Intersight provides cloud-based infrastructure management and APIs for supported Cisco UCS and related systems. Automation can retrieve inventory, work with policies and profiles, integrate infrastructure data into workflows, and perform management operations programmatically. This differs from traditional domain-local management through UCS Manager. Cisco ISE focuses on identity and access control, while CUCM and Expressway serve collaboration functions. Intersight&#8217;s REST APIs make it especially useful for centralized, modern automation across multiple infrastructure domains.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 253.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco Intersight API capability is most useful when an automation workflow must retrieve only servers with a specific model number?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Filtering<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> NAT<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Packet fragmentation<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route redistribution<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Filtering allows an Intersight API request to narrow results according to specified object attributes, such as model number, organization, status, or name. This reduces the amount of data transmitted and the amount the client must process. In a large environment, using filters is much more efficient than retrieving the full inventory and searching locally. NAT, fragmentation, and route redistribution are networking concepts unrelated to REST API result selection.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 254.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which mechanism should an Intersight client implement if an inventory response is limited to a fixed number of records per request?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Session reset<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Pagination<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route leaking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Spanning Tree<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Pagination allows a client to retrieve a large dataset in multiple manageable responses. If the API limits each response to a fixed number of objects, the client should continue using the API&#8217;s supported offset, limit, cursor, or continuation mechanism until all required records are retrieved. Failure to handle pagination can result in incomplete inventory data and incorrect automation decisions. Routing and Layer 2 control mechanisms are unrelated to API result retrieval.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 255.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Ansible feature is best for grouping a set of related reusable automation tasks into a maintainable structure?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Role<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Vault password only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Callback output<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Inventory host only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An Ansible role organizes reusable tasks, templates, variables, handlers, defaults, and files into a predictable directory structure. This makes large automation projects easier to maintain and reuse. For example, a role can encapsulate all tasks required to deploy a standard Nexus interface policy or validate device state. Inventory defines targets and Vault protects sensitive data, but neither provides the same modular organization. Roles promote consistency and reduce duplicated playbook logic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 256.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Ansible feature can trigger a restart or reload task only when another task actually changed configuration?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Inventory group<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Handler<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Vault<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Fact gathering only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Handlers are special Ansible tasks that run when notified by another task that reports a change. They are commonly used for follow-up actions such as restarting a service, reloading configuration, or performing validation only when the underlying state changed. This supports efficient and idempotent workflows. Inventory groups organize hosts, Vault protects secrets, and fact gathering collects information. Handlers reduce unnecessary operations and allow playbooks to express dependencies between configuration changes and follow-up actions cleanly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 257.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Terraform feature enables the same infrastructure code to be reused with different input values in multiple environments?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Input variables<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> State lock only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Provider checksum only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Plan cache only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Terraform input variables allow configuration to accept values externally instead of hardcoding environment-specific settings. The same code can therefore be used for development, testing, and production while supplying different tenant names, VLAN IDs, controller addresses, or other parameters. This reduces duplication and improves consistency. State locking and provider checksums serve different functions. Variables also make reusable modules more flexible, because callers can customize behavior without editing the module&#8217;s internal resource definitions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 258.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Terraform mechanism is best for packaging a standard group of resources into a reusable building block?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Backend<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Module<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Output only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> State lock<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A Terraform module groups related resources and logic into a reusable component. Modules can accept input variables and expose outputs, making it possible to standardize infrastructure patterns while still supporting environment-specific customization. A team might create modules for common network constructs, policy bundles, or server configurations. Backends manage state storage, outputs expose selected values, and state locking prevents concurrent state updates. Modules are a core technique for scaling infrastructure-as-code across multiple projects.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 259.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which NETCONF operation is used to modify configuration in a selected datastore?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;edit-config&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;get&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;hello&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;close-session&gt;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The NETCONF <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;edit-config&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> operation modifies configuration in a target datastore such as running or candidate, depending on device support. The request contains structured configuration data based on YANG models and can include operation instructions for merge, replace, create, or delete behavior. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;get&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> retrieves configuration and operational state, <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;hello&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> participates in session capability exchange, and <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&lt;close-session&gt;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> terminates the management session. Automation should verify datastore capabilities before assuming a particular configuration workflow is supported.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 260.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A team wants to prevent a production infrastructure deployment unless automated tests, policy checks, plan reviews, and required approvals all succeed. Which workflow best supports this goal?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Run scripts directly from individual workstations<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Store production credentials in plaintext<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> CI\/CD pipeline with staged quality gates and approvals<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable logging during deployment<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A CI\/CD pipeline can enforce a structured promotion process before infrastructure changes reach production. Automated stages can run linting, syntax validation, unit tests, integration tests, Terraform planning, security checks, and policy validation. High-impact deployments can then require peer review or explicit approval. If any required check fails, the pipeline should stop automatically. Direct execution from personal workstations and plaintext credentials weaken operational controls, while disabling logging reduces auditability. Staged CI\/CD provides a repeatable and safer approach to infrastructure automation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Cisco CCNP Data Center 300-635 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 241. Which Cisco ACI concept defines the complete hierarchical collection of managed objects represented by APIC? Management Information Tree 2. VLAN Pool 3. Endpoint Database only 4. Routing Information Base Correct Answer: 1 Explanation: Cisco ACI represents configuration and operational [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23910"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23910"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23911,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23910\/revisions\/23911"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}