{"id":24021,"date":"2026-09-28T12:01:27","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:01:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24021"},"modified":"2026-09-28T12:01:27","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:01:27","slug":"crowdstrike-ccis-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/crowdstrike-ccis-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part8-q141-160\/","title":{"rendered":"CrowdStrike CCIS Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part8 Q141-160"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/ccis-exam-dumps\"><b>CrowdStrike CCIS Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 141<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which capability helps analysts identify identities that may require additional security attention?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identity risk assessment<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disk formatting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Software installation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identity risk assessment helps security teams identify identities that may require additional investigation or security attention. Risk information can be based on available identity activity, authentication behavior, detections, and other security signals. Analysts should use this information as part of a broader investigation rather than treating a risk indicator as automatic proof of compromise. Reviewing identity risk can help security teams prioritize resources when many events are being generated. CCIS candidates should understand how risk assessment supports identity protection and how it can be combined with authentication telemetry, behavioral context, threat hunting, and appropriate response procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of identity security operations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 142<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is a key benefit of monitoring authentication activity continuously?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It eliminates all compromised credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It can help identify unusual access patterns<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It removes the need for MFA<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It grants users permanent trust<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Continuous authentication monitoring can help security teams identify unusual access patterns and investigate potentially suspicious behavior. Analysts can review information such as authentication timing, source details, authentication methods, and related identity activity. Continuous monitoring does not guarantee that every attack will be detected, but it provides valuable visibility for security operations. CCIS candidates should understand that authentication monitoring is particularly useful when combined with identity risk assessment and behavioral context. An unusual authentication event should be investigated using relevant evidence because legitimate circumstances can also produce unexpected patterns. Effective monitoring supports earlier identification of identity-related security concerns.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 143<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which identity type is typically associated with automated applications or services?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Human identity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Visitor identity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Programmatic identity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Temporary employee identity<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Programmatic identities are commonly associated with applications, services, scripts, and other automated processes. Their behavior often differs from that of human users because they may authenticate or access resources automatically. Understanding this distinction is important when investigating identity activity because an action that is normal for a human user may be unusual for a service identity. CCIS candidates should understand the importance of accurately identifying identity types and establishing appropriate behavioral expectations. Programmatic identities should receive appropriate security controls and monitoring because they can sometimes have access to important resources. Unexpected authentication or access activity from such identities may warrant additional investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 144<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which principle limits an identity&#8217;s access to only what is required for its role?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Least privilege<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Open access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Permanent trust<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Shared administration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Least privilege limits an identity&#8217;s access to only the permissions required for legitimate responsibilities. This principle reduces unnecessary exposure and can limit the potential impact if an identity is compromised. Organizations should regularly review permissions because job responsibilities and application requirements can change over time. Least privilege is an important component of Zero Trust and identity security strategies. CCIS candidates should understand that limiting permissions should be combined with strong authentication, monitoring, identity risk assessment, and access reviews. Applying least privilege consistently to both human and programmatic identities can help reduce opportunities for unauthorized access and lateral movement.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 145<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What should analysts review when an identity suddenly shows unusual behavior?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Only the user&#8217;s department<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Only the device manufacturer<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Relevant identity, authentication, and security context<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Only the time of the event<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When an identity suddenly exhibits unusual behavior, analysts should review relevant identity, authentication, and security context. Useful information may include previous activity, authentication methods, source details, associated endpoints, detections, and current risk indicators. Examining multiple signals helps analysts determine whether the activity is legitimate or potentially suspicious. An unusual event should not automatically be treated as confirmed compromise because legitimate operational changes can produce unexpected behavior. CCIS candidates should understand the importance of contextual investigation and evidence-based decision-making. Identity security platforms can help analysts correlate relevant information and determine whether additional investigation or response is appropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 146<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which control provides an additional authentication factor beyond a password?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File compression<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Multi-factor authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disk cleanup<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Network printing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Multi-factor authentication adds an additional verification factor beyond a password or another single authentication method. This can reduce the risk associated with stolen or compromised passwords because an attacker may still need another factor to authenticate successfully. MFA is an important component of identity security but should not be considered a complete solution by itself. CCIS candidates should understand how MFA works alongside identity monitoring, risk assessment, least privilege, and Zero Trust principles. Organizations should also monitor authentication activity and investigate suspicious attempts. Properly implemented MFA can significantly strengthen authentication security and reduce the potential impact of credential theft.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 147<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Why should privileged identities receive additional security attention?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They may have access to sensitive resources<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They cannot be compromised<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They never require authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They automatically have limited permissions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Privileged identities can have permissions that allow them to access sensitive systems, modify configurations, or manage important resources. Because of this broad access, compromise or misuse of a privileged identity can have significant consequences. Organizations should apply strong authentication, least privilege, monitoring, and periodic access reviews to privileged identities. CCIS candidates should understand that privileged accounts should not be treated as permanently trusted simply because they are used for administrative tasks. Identity monitoring and risk information can provide useful context when investigating privileged activity. Protecting privileged identities is therefore an important part of maintaining a strong identity security posture.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 148<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What can behavioral baselines help security analysts determine?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The user&#8217;s salary<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether observed identity activity differs from expected patterns<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The age of a workstation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The number of office printers<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Behavioral baselines provide a reference for understanding normal activity associated with an identity. Analysts can compare current authentication or access behavior against historical patterns to identify meaningful deviations. A deviation does not automatically mean that malicious activity has occurred, because legitimate circumstances can change normal behavior. However, significant differences can provide valuable investigation leads. CCIS candidates should understand how behavioral baselines support threat hunting and identity investigations. When combined with identity risk, authentication telemetry, and related detections, behavioral context can help security teams determine whether an event is routine, unusual, or potentially connected to a security incident.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 149<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which approach aligns with Zero Trust identity security?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Trusting all authenticated users permanently<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Giving every identity administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Continuously evaluating access and trust<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removing identity verification<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Zero Trust identity security emphasizes continuous evaluation rather than assuming that an identity remains trusted after a successful login. Access decisions can consider identity, authentication, authorization, device, resource, and other relevant security context. This approach can reduce unnecessary access and help limit the impact of compromised credentials. CCIS candidates should understand that Zero Trust does not simply mean denying access; it means verifying and authorizing access appropriately based on current conditions. Identity security capabilities can support this model by providing visibility into identity activity and risk. Strong authentication, least privilege, monitoring, and continuous assessment are important components of a Zero Trust strategy.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 150<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What can identity threat hunting help security teams discover?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Potentially suspicious activity that may not have triggered an alert<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Office equipment failures<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Employee payroll errors<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Printer configuration problems<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Identity threat hunting allows analysts to proactively search identity telemetry for suspicious patterns and behaviors. Automated detections may not identify every possible threat, so hunting can provide another method for discovering potentially malicious activity. Analysts can create hypotheses based on known attack techniques, unusual authentication behavior, or other indicators and then search available data for evidence. CCIS candidates should understand that threat hunting complements automated detection rather than replacing it. Effective identity hunting requires knowledge of normal behavior, identity types, available telemetry, and relevant attack patterns. Findings can also help security teams improve detection rules and strengthen identity protection controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 151<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which practice can reduce exposure from unnecessary identity permissions?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Granting permanent administrator access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Periodic access reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sharing credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabling authorization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Periodic access reviews help organizations identify permissions that may no longer be necessary. Users can change roles, applications can be retired, and business requirements can evolve, causing previously appropriate permissions to become unnecessary. Reviewing access regularly supports least privilege and reduces the potential impact of compromised credentials. CCIS candidates should understand that access reviews are an ongoing identity security activity rather than a one-time task. Organizations should consider both human and programmatic identities and pay particular attention to privileged access. Combining access reviews with identity monitoring and risk assessment can provide additional context for determining whether permissions remain appropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 152<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is the primary purpose of correlating identity and endpoint security information?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To replace authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To provide additional investigation context<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To eliminate security monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To grant unrestricted access<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Correlating identity and endpoint information can provide additional context during security investigations. Identity information can help analysts understand who or what performed an action, while endpoint telemetry can provide details about the system involved. Together, these sources may reveal relationships or patterns that are difficult to identify from a single data source. CCIS candidates should understand that correlation supports evidence-based investigations and can improve visibility into identity-related threats. Correlation does not automatically prove that an event is malicious. Analysts should evaluate the available evidence, establish a timeline, and follow organizational incident response procedures when determining whether additional containment or remediation is necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 153<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is an important characteristic of an effective identity security policy?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should be reviewed as requirements and risks change<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should never be updated<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should provide unrestricted access<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It should eliminate authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An effective identity security policy should be reviewed periodically because organizational requirements, identity environments, applications, and threats can change. A policy that was appropriate in one environment may become less effective as new systems or access requirements are introduced. Regular reviews help organizations maintain appropriate authentication, authorization, monitoring, and access controls. CCIS candidates should understand that policy management is an ongoing process. Changes should be carefully evaluated and tested to avoid unnecessary operational disruption. Identity security policies should support organizational requirements while maintaining appropriate protection for users, applications, services, and sensitive resources.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 154<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which event could warrant investigation for a service identity?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Expected scheduled processing<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Normal application communication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unexpected access outside its normal purpose<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Routine automated authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unexpected access outside the normal purpose of a service identity can warrant investigation. Programmatic identities typically have defined functions and predictable access requirements. Activity outside those expectations may indicate a configuration change, administrative action, misuse, or potential compromise. Analysts should investigate the event using available identity and security context before determining its significance. CCIS candidates should understand that programmatic identities require monitoring just like human identities, although their behavioral patterns may differ. Reviewing historical activity, authentication information, associated systems, and detections can help analysts determine whether the unusual behavior is legitimate or potentially represents a security concern.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 155<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What is a benefit of combining identity risk information with authentication telemetry?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It can provide more context for investigation and prioritization<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It eliminates all identity threats<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It guarantees every login is malicious<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It removes the need for access controls<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Combining identity risk information with authentication telemetry can provide analysts with additional context for investigation and prioritization. Risk information may indicate that an identity requires closer attention, while authentication telemetry can show how that identity is behaving. Reviewing both sources can help analysts understand whether unusual activity is consistent with the identity&#8217;s expected behavior. CCIS candidates should understand that risk information should not be considered conclusive by itself. Security teams should correlate multiple signals and evaluate the broader context before selecting a response. This approach supports more informed identity investigations and can help security teams focus their resources on potentially significant activity.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 156<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>What should an organization do if an identity integration stops providing expected data?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ignore the issue<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disable all identity security controls<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Investigate the integration and configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Grant all users administrator privileges<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If an identity integration stops providing expected data, administrators should investigate the integration and its configuration. Potential causes can include authentication failures, expired credentials, permission changes, connectivity issues, or configuration changes. Resolving such problems is important because missing identity data can reduce security visibility and affect investigations. CCIS candidates should understand that maintaining integrations is part of identity security operations. Administrators should monitor important connectors and establish procedures for troubleshooting failures. After making corrections, the integration should be validated to confirm that identity data is being received as expected and that security workflows depending on that information continue to function properly.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 157<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which action can help limit the impact of compromised credentials?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Increasing unnecessary privileges<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Applying least privilege and strong authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sharing the credentials across teams<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Removing identity monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Least privilege and strong authentication can work together to reduce the potential impact of compromised credentials. Strong authentication can make it more difficult for attackers to use stolen passwords, while least privilege limits what an identity can access if compromise occurs. These controls should be supported by monitoring, risk assessment, and appropriate response processes. CCIS candidates should understand that no individual control eliminates identity threats completely. A layered identity security approach provides multiple defensive mechanisms and can reduce both the likelihood and potential consequences of unauthorized access. Organizations should regularly review these controls as their identity environment and security requirements evolve.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 158<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Why is historical identity activity useful during an investigation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It can provide a comparison point for current behavior<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It guarantees that the identity is secure<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It prevents future authentication<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It eliminates the need for detections<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Historical identity activity provides a useful comparison point when analysts investigate current behavior. By understanding how an identity normally authenticates and accesses resources, analysts can identify changes that may warrant further investigation. Historical information can help establish timelines and reveal repeated patterns that are difficult to see in isolated events. However, deviations from historical behavior do not automatically indicate malicious activity because legitimate circumstances can change. CCIS candidates should understand how historical context supports threat hunting and investigation. Combining historical activity with current authentication telemetry, identity risk, and related detections can help analysts build a more complete understanding of potential identity security incidents.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 159<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which activity is most appropriate when an identity detection requires further validation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reviewing related evidence and context<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Immediately deleting the identity<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabling all organizational accounts<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ignoring the detection<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When an identity detection requires further validation, analysts should review related evidence and context before deciding on a response. Useful information can include authentication activity, identity type, historical behavior, associated systems, risk indicators, and related detections. This approach helps distinguish potentially malicious activity from legitimate events. CCIS candidates should understand that detection validation is an important part of security operations. Analysts should follow established procedures and avoid unnecessarily disruptive actions unless the available evidence supports them. Identity security platforms can help provide the contextual information needed to investigate detections and determine whether additional containment, remediation, or monitoring is appropriate.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Question 160<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><b>Which combination provides a layered approach to identity protection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unlimited access and shared credentials<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Passwords without monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Strong authentication, least privilege, monitoring, and investigation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disabled authentication and unrestricted permissions<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A layered identity protection strategy combines multiple security controls that address different aspects of identity risk. Strong authentication helps protect credentials, least privilege limits unnecessary access, monitoring provides visibility into identity activity, and investigation allows security teams to evaluate suspicious events. Additional capabilities such as risk assessment, threat hunting, and appropriate response can further strengthen the security posture. CCIS candidates should understand that identity protection is not dependent on a single control. Organizations should continuously review their identity environment, policies, integrations, and access permissions to ensure that controls remain effective. Combining these practices supports a more comprehensive approach to protecting identities against evolving threats.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full CrowdStrike CCIS Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps. &nbsp; Question 141 Which capability helps analysts identify identities that may require additional security attention? Identity risk assessment Printer configuration Disk formatting Software installation Correct Answer: 1 Explanation Identity risk assessment helps security teams identify identities that may require additional investigation or security attention. Risk [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24021"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24021"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24021\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24022,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24021\/revisions\/24022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}