{"id":24045,"date":"2026-09-28T12:04:29","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:04:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24045"},"modified":"2026-09-28T12:04:29","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:04:29","slug":"crowdstrike-ccis-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/crowdstrike-ccis-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part20-q381-400\/","title":{"rendered":"CrowdStrike CCIS Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part20 Q381-400"},"content":{"rendered":"

View Full <\/b>CrowdStrike CCIS Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a> and Practice Test Dumps.<\/b><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

Question 381<\/b><\/h3>\n

What is a key purpose of continuously monitoring identity activity?<\/b><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. To eliminate all identity accounts<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. To identify suspicious changes and behaviors as they occur<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. To provide unrestricted access<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. To replace all security controls<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

    Continuous identity monitoring provides visibility into authentication, privilege changes, resource access, and other identity-related activities. This visibility can help security teams identify suspicious behavior while an event is occurring rather than discovering it much later. Monitoring can be especially valuable for privileged accounts, service accounts, and identities accessing sensitive resources. Security teams should correlate identity activity with device and endpoint information to improve context. Continuous monitoring does not prevent every compromise, but it can support faster detection and investigation. Effective monitoring should also be tuned to organizational behavior so that analysts can focus on meaningful security events.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Question 382<\/b><\/h3>\n

    Which action can reduce the risk associated with unused user accounts?<\/b><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Granting them additional privileges<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Sharing them with active employees<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Disabling or removing them according to lifecycle procedures<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Exempting them from security reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

      Unused user accounts can provide unnecessary authentication paths and may become security risks if credentials are compromised. Organizations should regularly identify inactive accounts and determine whether they still have a legitimate business purpose. Accounts that are no longer required should generally be disabled or removed according to established lifecycle procedures. Before taking action, teams should check for dependencies, ownership, and retention requirements. Automated identity lifecycle processes can help reduce the number of forgotten accounts. Periodic access reviews provide another opportunity to identify inactive identities and ensure that unnecessary access does not remain available indefinitely.<\/span><\/p>\n

      Question 383<\/b><\/h3>\n

      Why should security teams monitor changes to privileged group membership?<\/b><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Changes may grant identities access to sensitive administrative capabilities.<\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Privileged groups never affect access.<\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Group membership cannot be changed after account creation.<\/span><\/li>\n
      4. Monitoring group membership eliminates authentication.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

        Privileged group membership can determine whether an identity has administrative capabilities across systems or applications. An unexpected addition to such a group may indicate unauthorized privilege escalation, compromised credentials, or an improperly approved change. Analysts should investigate who performed the modification, which identity was added, when the change occurred, and whether it was authorized. Subsequent administrative activity can provide additional context. Organizations should maintain appropriate approval and review processes for privileged group changes. Monitoring these changes supports least privilege and provides useful evidence when investigating identity-based security incidents.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Question 384<\/b><\/h3>\n

        What is an important benefit of using strong authentication for privileged accounts?<\/b><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. It removes the need for access reviews.<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. It guarantees that privileged accounts cannot be compromised.<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. It provides an additional barrier against unauthorized use of privileged credentials.<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. It gives privileged users unrestricted access.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

          Privileged accounts can perform high-impact actions, so protecting them with strong authentication provides an additional barrier against unauthorized access. Multi-factor authentication and other strong authentication mechanisms can reduce the risk associated with stolen passwords or single-factor credentials. Organizations should combine strong authentication with least privilege, privileged access management, monitoring, and appropriate approval processes. Strong authentication does not guarantee that compromise is impossible, particularly if other attack paths exist. Security teams should therefore continue monitoring privileged activity and investigate unusual authentication or administrative behavior. Layered identity controls provide stronger protection than relying on authentication strength alone.<\/span><\/p>\n

          Question 385<\/b><\/h3>\n

          Which activity may indicate that a compromised identity is being used for discovery?<\/b><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Accessing only the user’s normal application<\/span><\/li>\n
          2. Querying numerous systems or resources that are unrelated to the identity’s normal responsibilities<\/span><\/li>\n
          3. Completing an approved password change<\/span><\/li>\n
          4. Performing a scheduled task<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

            An identity suddenly querying numerous systems or resources outside its normal responsibilities may indicate discovery activity. Attackers often attempt to learn about available systems, accounts, applications, or sensitive resources after obtaining access. Analysts should examine the identity’s historical behavior, privileges, source device, authentication details, and resources queried. Legitimate administrators may perform broad discovery as part of authorized work, so business context is important. Correlating identity telemetry with endpoint and network activity can help determine whether the behavior is expected. Detecting unusual discovery activity can help security teams investigate potential compromise before attackers progress to additional stages.<\/span><\/p>\n

            Question 386<\/b><\/h3>\n

            What is the purpose of reviewing identity permissions after a security incident?<\/b><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. To determine whether excessive or unauthorized access contributed to the incident<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. To automatically grant all users administrator privileges<\/span><\/li>\n
            3. To eliminate all access controls<\/span><\/li>\n
            4. To prevent future access reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

              Post-incident permission reviews can help determine whether excessive, outdated, or unauthorized access contributed to the incident. Investigators can compare the compromised identity’s permissions with its legitimate responsibilities and examine which resources were accessible or actually accessed. Any unnecessary permissions should be removed according to least-privilege principles. Organizations can also use findings to improve provisioning, access review, and privileged-access processes. Reviewing permissions after an incident helps address underlying weaknesses rather than simply restoring the affected account. The goal is to reduce the likelihood and potential impact of similar identity compromises in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n

              Question 387<\/b><\/h3>\n

              Which characteristic makes a machine identity different from a typical human identity?<\/b><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. It often performs automated activity based on application or workload processes.<\/span><\/li>\n
              2. It never requires permissions.<\/span><\/li>\n
              3. It cannot access organizational resources.<\/span><\/li>\n
              4. It is always more secure than a human identity.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                Machine identities commonly represent applications, services, workloads, APIs, or automated processes. Their activity can occur without direct human interaction and may follow predictable operational patterns. Security teams should understand the identity’s purpose, owner, permissions, associated workloads, and expected behavior. Automated activity should still be monitored because compromised machine identities can provide attackers with persistent access. Applying least privilege and protecting associated credentials or tokens are important controls. Machine identities are not automatically more secure than human identities. Their automated nature simply means that identity governance and detection strategies should account for different patterns of legitimate activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Question 388<\/b><\/h3>\n

                What should an analyst do when an identity alert has insufficient context?<\/b><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Automatically classify the event as malicious.<\/span><\/li>\n
                2. Ignore the alert permanently.<\/span><\/li>\n
                3. Gather additional relevant telemetry before making a determination.<\/span><\/li>\n
                4. Disable the affected security controls.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                  When an identity alert lacks sufficient context, analysts should gather additional relevant information before deciding whether the activity is malicious. Useful information may include authentication records, device details, privilege information, resource access, historical behavior, and related endpoint activity. Additional context can help distinguish legitimate unusual activity from potential compromise. Automatically classifying an incomplete event can lead to unnecessary response actions or missed threats. Security teams should also improve detection logic when repeated alerts lack important context. High-quality investigations depend on sufficient evidence and correlation rather than assumptions based on isolated identity events.<\/span><\/p>\n

                  Question 389<\/b><\/h3>\n

                  Why is rapid deprovisioning important when an employee leaves an organization?<\/b><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. It can reduce the period during which the former employee’s credentials may remain usable.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  2. It gives the former employee additional access.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  3. It eliminates all authentication logs.<\/span><\/li>\n
                  4. It prevents organizations from performing access reviews.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                    Rapid deprovisioning helps ensure that accounts and access are removed or restricted when an employee no longer has a legitimate business relationship with the organization. Delayed deprovisioning can leave credentials, sessions, group memberships, or application permissions active unnecessarily. Organizations should use coordinated lifecycle processes to address access across relevant systems and applications. Active sessions and tokens may also require appropriate revocation. Deprovisioning should be carefully managed to avoid disrupting required business processes or retaining unnecessary access. Strong offboarding procedures reduce the number of potentially unauthorized authentication paths and support better identity governance.<\/span><\/p>\n

                    Question 390<\/b><\/h3>\n

                    Which activity is most relevant when investigating possible identity persistence?<\/b><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Reviewing unexpected authentication methods or account configuration changes<\/span><\/li>\n
                    2. Checking the user’s desktop wallpaper<\/span><\/li>\n
                    3. Reviewing monitor settings<\/span><\/li>\n
                    4. Changing application themes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                      Unexpected authentication methods, account configuration changes, or newly established access mechanisms may indicate attempts to maintain access after initial compromise. Analysts should examine when the change occurred, who initiated it, whether it was authorized, and what activity followed. Other persistence-related indicators may include unexpected account creation, privilege changes, or unusual credentials and tokens. Investigation should correlate identity events with endpoint and application telemetry. Legitimate administrative changes can resemble suspicious activity, so authorization and business context must be validated. Monitoring identity configuration changes provides valuable visibility into potential persistence techniques.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      Question 391<\/b><\/h3>\n

                      What is a key advantage of using role-based access controls?<\/b><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. They provide identical access to every identity.<\/span><\/li>\n
                      2. They can align permissions with defined job or functional responsibilities.<\/span><\/li>\n
                      3. They eliminate the need for authentication.<\/span><\/li>\n
                      4. They automatically detect every compromised account.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                        Role-based access controls can simplify identity governance by associating permissions with defined roles or responsibilities. Instead of assigning every permission individually, organizations can establish role-specific access that reflects business requirements. This can make provisioning, reviews, and permission changes more consistent. Role-based controls should still be reviewed because employees change responsibilities and roles may evolve. Excessive permissions within a role can also create risk, so least privilege remains important. Role-based access is therefore a governance mechanism rather than a complete security solution. It works best when combined with lifecycle management, access reviews, and monitoring.<\/span><\/p>\n

                        Question 392<\/b><\/h3>\n

                        Which indicator may suggest an identity has been compromised by credential theft?<\/b><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. A successful login from an unexpected device followed by unusual resource access<\/span><\/li>\n
                        2. A routine login from a known managed device<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. A scheduled application authentication<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. An approved administrative session<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                          A successful login from an unexpected device followed by unusual resource access can indicate possible credential theft or misuse. Analysts should investigate the authentication method, device status, location, timing, privileges, and resources accessed. Historical behavior can help determine whether the event differs significantly from normal activity. Legitimate users may sometimes authenticate from new devices, so additional context is necessary before concluding that compromise occurred. Correlation with endpoint and identity telemetry can help establish whether suspicious activity followed the login. Early investigation of such patterns can help contain potential compromise before further unauthorized access occurs.<\/span><\/p>\n

                          Question 393<\/b><\/h3>\n

                          What is the purpose of conducting regular privileged-access reviews?<\/b><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. To ensure privileged permissions remain justified and appropriate.<\/span><\/li>\n
                          2. To increase administrative access for all users.<\/span><\/li>\n
                          3. To remove all privileged accounts regardless of need.<\/span><\/li>\n
                          4. To disable privileged monitoring.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                            Regular privileged-access reviews help ensure that administrative permissions remain necessary and aligned with current responsibilities. Users may change roles, projects may end, and systems may be replaced, leaving some privileged access no longer justified. Reviewing privileged accounts can identify excessive permissions, inactive accounts, unexpected group memberships, and other governance issues. Organizations should document ownership and business justification and remove unnecessary privileges according to established procedures. Privileged-access reviews should be performed periodically and after significant role changes. Maintaining appropriate administrative access reduces unnecessary exposure while preserving legitimate operational capabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

                            Question 394<\/b><\/h3>\n

                            Which practice can help protect sensitive identity credentials stored by applications?<\/b><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Storing secrets in publicly accessible files<\/span><\/li>\n
                            2. Using secure secret-management mechanisms with appropriate access controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                            3. Sharing secrets through unsecured messages<\/span><\/li>\n
                            4. Embedding unrestricted administrator passwords in source code<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                              Applications may require credentials, API keys, tokens, or other secrets to communicate with services. Secure secret-management mechanisms can protect these values through controlled access, encryption, auditing, and appropriate rotation capabilities. Applications should receive only the permissions required for their functions. Hard-coding unrestricted credentials into source code or storing secrets in publicly accessible locations can significantly increase exposure. Security teams should also monitor access to sensitive secrets and investigate unexpected usage. Secure secret management is particularly important for machine identities because automated processes may operate continuously and can otherwise expose credentials across development or operational environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                              Question 395<\/b><\/h3>\n

                              What is an important purpose of identity-focused threat hunting?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. To proactively investigate suspicious patterns that automated detections may miss<\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. To disable all authentication controls<\/span><\/li>\n
                              3. To grant additional privileges to every identity<\/span><\/li>\n
                              4. To remove historical security data<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                Identity-focused threat hunting proactively searches identity telemetry for suspicious patterns that may not have generated an existing alert. Hunters can examine unusual authentication behavior, privilege changes, access to sensitive resources, service-account activity, and other identity-related indicators. Hunting can uncover previously unknown activity and identify gaps in automated detections. Findings can then be used to improve detection rules, access controls, and investigation procedures. Effective hunting requires reliable telemetry and an understanding of expected identity behavior. It complements automated detection and incident response by providing a proactive method for identifying potential identity-based threats.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                Question 396<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                Why should organizations monitor identity activity after credentials are reset following a compromise?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Continued monitoring can help identify remaining unauthorized activity or persistence.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                2. A password reset guarantees that no attacker remains active.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                3. Monitoring is unnecessary after remediation.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                4. Credential resets automatically remove every session and token.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                  Resetting credentials is an important remediation step, but it may not address every form of unauthorized access. Attackers may have established sessions, tokens, additional accounts, or other persistence mechanisms before the reset occurred. Continued monitoring can help identify suspicious activity after credentials are changed. Security teams should consider session and token revocation, privilege reviews, endpoint investigation, and related identity activity as appropriate. Post-remediation monitoring provides additional assurance that unauthorized activity has stopped. It also helps determine whether the original compromise affected other identities or resources that require further investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                  Question 397<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                  Which factor should influence the priority of an identity security alert?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. The identity’s privileges and the sensitivity of affected resources<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  2. The user’s preferred application theme<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  3. The computer’s screen size<\/span><\/li>\n
                                  4. The age of the user’s keyboard<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                    Alert prioritization should consider the potential impact of the activity. An alert involving a highly privileged identity accessing sensitive resources may require greater attention than an equivalent anomaly involving a low-privilege identity and routine resources. Other useful factors include authentication context, device risk, historical behavior, and related security events. Risk-based prioritization helps analysts focus on activity with potentially greater consequences while avoiding unnecessary escalation of lower-risk events. The priority should remain based on available evidence and organizational risk criteria. Contextual alerting improves the efficiency and effectiveness of identity security operations.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                    Question 398<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                    What should organizations do when an identity’s permissions are no longer aligned with its responsibilities?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Review and adjust the permissions to match current requirements.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    2. Keep all historical permissions permanently.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    3. Add more administrative privileges.<\/span><\/li>\n
                                    4. Disable access governance processes.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                      Identity permissions should reflect current responsibilities and business requirements. When an employee changes roles or an application’s function changes, previously assigned permissions may become unnecessary. Organizations should review the identity’s access and remove or modify permissions that are no longer justified. This process supports least privilege and reduces potential impact if the identity is compromised. Changes should be documented and, where appropriate, approved by the relevant resource or business owner. Regular reviews and automated lifecycle processes can reduce permission accumulation. Aligning access with current responsibilities is an important component of identity governance and risk reduction.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                      Question 399<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                      Which telemetry can help determine what an identity did after a suspicious authentication?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Resource-access and endpoint activity associated with the identity<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      2. Desktop wallpaper information<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      3. Monitor brightness settings<\/span><\/li>\n
                                      4. Keyboard manufacturer information<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                        Resource-access and endpoint telemetry can help investigators understand what occurred after a suspicious authentication. Resource logs may show applications, files, databases, or systems accessed, while endpoint telemetry can provide information about processes, network connections, and device activity. Correlating these signals with authentication records can help establish a timeline and determine potential impact. Analysts should also examine privilege changes and other identity events that occurred during the same period. Multiple telemetry sources provide stronger investigative context than authentication data alone. This correlation can help identify lateral movement, privilege abuse, data access, or other post-authentication activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                        Question 400<\/b><\/h3>\n

                                        What is a core objective of a mature identity security program?<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. To provide every identity with maximum privileges<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        2. To eliminate identity monitoring<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        3. To continuously manage, monitor, and reduce identity-related risk<\/span><\/li>\n
                                        4. To prevent users from accessing organizational resources<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          Explanation<\/b><\/p>\n

                                          A mature identity security program continuously manages identity-related risk across the identity lifecycle. It combines appropriate provisioning and deprovisioning, least privilege, strong authentication, privileged-access controls, monitoring, detection, investigation, and regular access reviews. The program should cover human and non-human identities and adapt as applications, users, devices, and business requirements change. Continuous improvement is important because identity threats and organizational environments evolve over time. The objective is not to eliminate legitimate access but to ensure that identities receive appropriate access, suspicious activity is detected, and unnecessary exposure is reduced. This creates a more controlled and measurable identity security posture.<\/span><\/p>\n

                                           <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          View Full CrowdStrike CCIS Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps.   Question 381 What is a key purpose of continuously monitoring identity activity? To eliminate all identity accounts To identify suspicious changes and behaviors as they occur To provide unrestricted access To replace all security controls Correct Answer: 2 Explanation Continuous identity monitoring provides visibility […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24045"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24045"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24046,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24045\/revisions\/24046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}