{"id":24057,"date":"2026-09-28T12:22:03","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:22:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24057"},"modified":"2026-09-28T12:22:03","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:22:03","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part6-q101-120","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part6-q101-120\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part6 Q101-120"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/300-725-exam-dumps\"><b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 101.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco Secure Web Appliance component is primarily responsible for deciding whether a user&#8217;s HTTP or HTTPS request should be allowed, blocked, or otherwise handled according to policy?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Access policy engine<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Routing protocol process<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP server<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Spanning Tree instance<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The access policy engine evaluates web requests against configured rules and determines the appropriate action. Policy decisions can consider factors such as user identity, group membership, destination category, reputation, application type, file characteristics, and time-based conditions. This allows organizations to create granular controls for different users and use cases. Routing protocols, DHCP, and Spanning Tree operate at the network infrastructure layer and do not provide application-aware web policy enforcement. Proper policy ordering and scope are important because overly broad rules may unintentionally override more specific controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 102.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which feature is most useful when administrators want to permit access to a website but prevent users from uploading files to it?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP tracking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Application or request-method control<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN pruning<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route summarization<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application-aware or HTTP request-method controls can distinguish between different user activities on the same web service. Depending on platform capabilities and policy design, administrators may allow browsing while restricting uploads, posts, or other higher-risk actions. This provides more granular enforcement than simply allowing or blocking the entire domain. HSRP, VLAN pruning, and route summarization do not inspect application behavior. Granular controls are particularly useful for collaboration, social media, and cloud storage services where some functions may be permitted while others remain restricted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 103.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which HTTP method is most commonly associated with submitting or uploading data to a web application?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> GET<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HEAD<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> POST<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> OPTIONS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">HTTP POST is commonly used to submit information to a web application, including form data, API payloads, and file uploads. Secure web policies may therefore inspect or control POST requests when organizations want to limit data submission to particular destinations. GET generally retrieves resources, HEAD retrieves headers without a normal response body, and OPTIONS requests supported communication options. Understanding HTTP methods helps security administrators create more precise web controls and investigate access logs more effectively.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 104.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance control would be most appropriate for stopping users from browsing newly registered or otherwise high-risk domains?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> STP guard<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> LACP policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP authentication<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Reputation or category-based web policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Newly registered or poorly established domains can represent increased security risk because attackers often create domains for phishing, malware delivery, or command-and-control activity. Reputation and URL categorization can help identify and restrict these destinations. Administrators may block them, require additional inspection, or allow them only for specific users. Layer 2 and redundancy features such as STP, LACP, and HSRP do not evaluate domain age, reputation, or security context.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 105.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which policy design principle helps prevent a broadly permissive rule from unintentionally bypassing a more specific security restriction?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review policy order and match conditions carefully<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable logging<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use one rule for all users and destinations<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove identity information<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy order and matching logic are critical in secure web configurations. A broad allow rule placed ahead of a more specific restrictive rule may cause traffic to be permitted before the restrictive condition is evaluated. Administrators should use narrowly scoped rules, review evaluation order, test expected matches, and monitor logs after changes. Disabling logs or using overly broad policies reduces visibility and increases risk. Effective policy design balances simplicity with sufficient specificity to enforce business and security requirements correctly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 106.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which capability is most useful when a security administrator wants to test how a new web policy will affect users before enforcing it broadly?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable the proxy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use monitor-only or limited pilot enforcement where supported<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete the existing policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Apply the rule globally immediately<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A monitor-only, reporting, or pilot approach allows administrators to observe how a proposed policy would affect real traffic before enforcing it across the organization. This can reveal false positives, application dependencies, and unexpected user impact. A limited group can then be used for controlled testing before broad rollout. Immediate global enforcement increases the blast radius of configuration errors. Effective security operations typically combine staged deployment, logging, user feedback, and clear rollback procedures.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 107.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which type of information is most important when troubleshooting why one Active Directory group receives a different web policy from another?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Switch fan speed<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface CRC counters<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> User identity and group mapping<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Router CPU utilization only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When different directory groups receive different web policies, the first troubleshooting focus should be identity mapping and group membership. Administrators should verify which username the gateway identified, which directory groups were returned, and which policy matched that identity. If group information is incorrect or unavailable, the expected policy may not apply. Hardware and network interface statistics may be useful for separate infrastructure issues but do not explain user-to-policy mapping.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 108.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which problem is most likely if a directory service becomes unavailable and the Secure Web Appliance cannot determine user group membership?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> All VLANs are automatically deleted<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> BGP sessions reset<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Switch ports enter err-disabled state<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Identity-based policy may fall back or fail according to configured behavior<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the web gateway cannot obtain identity or group information, identity-based policy decisions may be affected. The appliance may apply a fallback policy, require authentication, deny access, or use another configured behavior depending on the deployment. This is why directory and authentication services should be designed for availability and monitored carefully. Identity failures do not normally delete VLANs, reset routing sessions, or disable switch ports. Administrators should understand fail-open versus fail-closed implications before production deployment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 109.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which approach provides the strongest control when administrators want to prevent users from bypassing the corporate proxy by connecting directly to external web servers?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Enforce network egress policy so web traffic must use approved security paths<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rely only on user instructions<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable logging<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow unrestricted outbound TCP 80 and 443 from all endpoints<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Proxy enforcement is stronger when network controls prevent endpoints from bypassing approved web security infrastructure. Firewalls, access controls, routing policy, or endpoint configuration can be used so direct outbound web connections are blocked or restricted while approved proxy paths remain available. User instructions alone do not provide technical enforcement. Allowing unrestricted outbound web traffic makes proxy bypass easy. Effective designs combine secure web policy with network architecture that ensures traffic follows the intended inspection path.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 110.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security concern is most important when storing administrative credentials used by a Secure Web Appliance integration?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Link speed<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Protect the credentials using least privilege and secure secret storage<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN numbering<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface naming<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Administrative and service credentials should be protected carefully because compromise could allow attackers to alter security policies, access logs, or impersonate trusted integrations. Credentials should follow least-privilege principles, be stored in approved secret-management systems, rotated when appropriate, and never embedded in scripts or shared informally. Link speed, VLAN numbering, and interface naming do not address credential security. Separate service accounts can also improve accountability and simplify revocation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 111.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which log event is most useful when investigating whether a malware download was blocked before it reached the client?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Web transaction log containing file verdict and action<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Switch CAM table<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> OSPF neighbor log<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Power supply status<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A web transaction or access log containing file reputation, malware verdict, URL, user, and enforcement action provides direct evidence about whether a malicious download was allowed, blocked, or otherwise handled. Investigators can correlate these records with endpoint and DNS telemetry for a broader view of the incident. Switching and routing logs do not normally contain file-level verdict information. Detailed transaction logging is therefore essential for malware investigations and policy validation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 112.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which malware analysis result should normally trigger the strongest blocking action?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File is known-good<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File is confirmed malicious<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File has a valid extension<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File was downloaded over HTTPS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A confirmed malicious verdict provides strong evidence that a file poses a security threat, so policy should generally block delivery and generate appropriate logging or alerting. A known-good verdict may allow normal handling, while an unknown verdict may require additional analysis depending on risk tolerance. File extension and HTTPS transport do not determine whether content is safe. Malware controls should use reputation, behavioral analysis, threat intelligence, and policy context rather than relying on superficial characteristics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 113.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security feature is most useful for identifying where a malicious file was previously observed after its verdict changes from unknown to malicious?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File trajectory or retrospective tracking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route redistribution<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN database<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Spanning Tree topology<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File trajectory or retrospective tracking helps security teams determine where a file was first seen, which users or devices interacted with it, and how its verdict changed over time. This becomes especially valuable when a file initially classified as unknown is later identified as malicious. Investigators can use this information to prioritize endpoint remediation and incident response. Routing, VLAN, and Spanning Tree information cannot provide equivalent file-level historical visibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 114.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance function is most appropriate for blocking a known phishing page even if the site uses a valid TLS certificate?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP snooping<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> URL reputation and categorization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP tracking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Port-channel hashing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A valid TLS certificate confirms certain aspects of encrypted communication but does not prove that the website itself is trustworthy. Phishing sites can obtain valid certificates. URL reputation, category information, threat intelligence, and content inspection are therefore needed to evaluate whether the destination is malicious. Network-layer redundancy and switching functions cannot determine whether a web page is phishing. Security decisions should never treat possession of a valid certificate as proof of safety.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 115.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which TLS inspection approach is most appropriate when only selected categories need to be decrypted?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Configure selective decryption according to policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Decrypt everything regardless of policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable HTTPS completely<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Bypass every encrypted website<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Selective decryption allows organizations to inspect categories where security visibility is most valuable while exempting traffic that should remain private or cannot tolerate interception. Policies may consider destination category, reputation, user group, or other factors. This approach can reduce privacy concerns, improve performance, and limit compatibility issues compared with indiscriminate decryption. Exemptions and inspected categories should be documented and reviewed regularly to ensure the policy continues to match business and regulatory requirements.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 116.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which condition is most likely to generate browser certificate warnings after HTTPS inspection is enabled?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The client does not trust the inspection certificate authority<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The switch has a high interface utilization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The DHCP lease duration is short<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The router has multiple default routes<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During TLS inspection, the secure web gateway presents dynamically generated certificates signed by its inspection certificate authority. If clients do not trust that CA, browsers typically display certificate warnings. The organization should securely deploy the inspection CA certificate to managed endpoints and verify the certificate chain. Interface utilization, DHCP duration, and routing topology do not normally cause this specific trust warning. The inspection CA private key must be protected because compromise could undermine trust across all managed endpoints.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 117.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco cloud-delivered security capability is most useful for enforcing acceptable-use and threat policy before a user reaches a malicious domain?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Umbrella DNS-layer security<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco UCS Service Profile<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco APIC tenant<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Unified Communications Manager route pattern<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco Umbrella can apply DNS-layer policy before a user or application establishes a full connection to a destination. It can block domains associated with malware, phishing, command-and-control activity, or policy-restricted categories. Because the decision occurs during name resolution, the unwanted connection can be stopped early. UCS Service Profiles, APIC tenants, and CUCM route patterns serve unrelated infrastructure and collaboration functions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 118.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which DNS security limitation should administrators remember when designing layered protection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS controls may not stop traffic that uses direct IP addresses or other non-DNS mechanisms<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS security automatically decrypts every TLS session<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS security replaces endpoint malware protection<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DNS security prevents every possible attack<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DNS-layer security is powerful but should not be treated as the only defense. Malware or attackers may communicate directly with an IP address, use compromised legitimate services, or employ techniques that do not depend on normal DNS resolution. Therefore, DNS protection should be combined with secure web gateways, endpoint security, firewalls, identity controls, and monitoring. It does not automatically decrypt TLS traffic or guarantee prevention of every threat. Layered security reduces dependence on any one enforcement point.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 119.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which operational control best supports recovery if a newly deployed Secure Web Appliance policy causes widespread business disruption?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Maintain a tested rollback plan and previous known-good configuration<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Delete all previous configuration backups<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable audit logging<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Make changes without documenting them<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A tested rollback plan allows administrators to restore a previous known-good state quickly if a new security policy causes unexpected disruption. This should be combined with configuration backups, change documentation, staged deployment, and clear validation criteria. Deleting backups or disabling audit logs makes recovery and troubleshooting more difficult. Because secure web policy can affect large portions of the organization simultaneously, rollback preparation is an important part of change management.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 120.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>After a new web filtering rule is deployed, help-desk reports show that a required cloud application is blocked only for one department. What should the administrator investigate first?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace the network switches<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable all security controls<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Verify the affected users&#8217; identity, group membership, and matched web policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove DNS protection globally<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the issue affects only one department, the most likely cause is a difference in identity-based policy or group mapping. The administrator should verify which users are identified, what directory groups are returned, and which policy rule is matching their requests. Logs should then be compared with users who can access the application successfully. This targeted troubleshooting approach is safer than broadly disabling security controls. Once the cause is confirmed, the policy can be corrected with the narrowest necessary change.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 101. Which Cisco Secure Web Appliance component is primarily responsible for deciding whether a user&#8217;s HTTP or HTTPS request should be allowed, blocked, or otherwise handled according to policy? Access policy engine 2. Routing protocol process 3. DHCP server 4. Spanning [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24057"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24057"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24058,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24057\/revisions\/24058"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}