{"id":24067,"date":"2026-09-28T12:23:18","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:23:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/?p=24067"},"modified":"2026-09-28T12:23:18","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T12:23:18","slug":"cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/cisco-ccnp-security-300-725-practice-test-questions-and-exam-dumps-part11-q201-220\/","title":{"rendered":"Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps Part11 Q201-220"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>View Full <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/300-725-exam-dumps\"><b>Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps<\/b><\/a><b> and Practice Test Dumps<\/b><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Question 201.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance policy is most appropriate when access should depend on both the user&#8217;s identity and the destination category?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Identity-aware access policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Static route<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP group<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Port-channel policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An identity-aware access policy allows the Secure Web Appliance to evaluate both who the user is and what type of destination is being requested. For example, a finance group might be permitted to reach certain financial services while another group is restricted. This provides more precise control than using source IP addresses or destination categories alone. Static routes, HSRP groups, and port-channel settings are network infrastructure constructs and do not provide application-layer, user-aware web filtering.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 202.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which authentication design is best when the organization wants the Secure Web Appliance to distinguish employees from contractors?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use only source IP addresses<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Integrate with a directory service and use group membership<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authentication<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use switch port numbers only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Directory integration provides user identity and group membership that can be used to distinguish employees, contractors, administrators, and other roles. This allows policies to reflect organizational responsibilities rather than only network location. Source IP addresses may change and do not reliably represent a person&#8217;s business role. Disabling authentication removes identity context, while switch port numbers identify connectivity rather than user authorization. Group-based policy is generally more scalable and easier to maintain.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 203.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which feature should an administrator use to evaluate which rule will match a specific user, source address, and destination URL?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface counters<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Routing table<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Policy trace<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Power status<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy tracing is designed to show how a request is evaluated against configured rules. The administrator can use values such as user identity, source address, URL, category, and other criteria to determine which policy will apply. This is especially useful when multiple access or decryption policies overlap. Interface counters and routing tables can help troubleshoot network connectivity but do not explain why a particular web security rule was selected.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 204.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which action should be used when an approved service account cannot respond to interactive proxy authentication challenges?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authentication globally<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allow anonymous access for everyone<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove directory integration<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Create a narrowly scoped authentication exemption<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A narrowly scoped authentication exemption is appropriate for trusted systems or service accounts that cannot support interactive proxy authentication. The exception should be restricted using specific source, destination, or other criteria and should be logged and reviewed. Disabling authentication for the entire organization would remove valuable identity information and weaken policy enforcement. Exceptions should be treated as controlled deviations from the normal security model rather than broad workarounds.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 205.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Secure Web Appliance policy determines whether a user may browse to a particular destination?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Access policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> NTP configuration<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Routing policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The access policy determines whether web requests are allowed, blocked, warned, or otherwise handled based on criteria such as user identity, URL category, reputation, and application. It answers the question of whether the request should be permitted. Decryption policy is a separate layer that determines whether an HTTPS session should be inspected. NTP, interface, and routing configuration support appliance operation but do not make user web-access decisions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 206.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which policy controls whether an HTTPS connection is decrypted for content inspection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Decryption policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP policy<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN policy<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The decryption policy determines whether HTTPS traffic is intercepted and decrypted, passed through without inspection, or handled according to an exception. This allows organizations to inspect risky traffic while exempting sensitive categories or applications that cannot tolerate TLS interception. Access and decryption policy are related but separate decisions. A site may be permitted by access policy and still be either decrypted or bypassed according to the decryption policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 207.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which setting is most important when a custom URL category should match only a specific business domain and not its lookalike domains?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP priority<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> STP cost<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Precise URL or domain matching criteria<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface speed<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Custom URL categories should use precise matching criteria so the intended destination is included without accidentally matching unrelated or lookalike domains. Administrators should review wildcard behavior, domain boundaries, and any pattern syntax supported by the appliance. Overly broad matching can affect both access and decryption policies if the same category is referenced by several rules. Network-layer values such as STP cost or interface speed do not influence URL category matching.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 208.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which action is safest when testing a new custom URL category in production?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Apply it globally immediately<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable all logging<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Replace existing policies<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Use a limited pilot or monitoring scope first<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 4<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A limited pilot or monitoring scope reduces the impact of an incorrect custom category. Administrators can validate that expected sites match, unrelated sites do not, and linked access or decryption policies behave correctly. Transaction logs and policy tracing should be reviewed during testing. Immediate global rollout increases the blast radius of a mistake. Controlled deployment is especially important for custom categories because a single pattern can influence multiple security policies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 209.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which feature is most appropriate when the organization wants users to access a cloud storage platform but not upload files to it?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Application visibility and control<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Static routing<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP relay<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP tracking<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Application visibility and control can provide more granular enforcement than a simple domain block or allow rule. Where supported, it can distinguish between activities such as viewing, downloading, posting, or uploading. This allows the organization to permit legitimate use of a cloud service while reducing data-loss risk. Static routing and redundancy functions do not inspect the behavior of web applications at this level.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 210.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security control should be combined with granular application restrictions to detect confidential information in outbound uploads?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> STP<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Data loss prevention<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> LACP<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DLP can inspect outbound content for sensitive information such as regulated data, personal information, intellectual property, or financial records. Combining DLP with application control provides stronger protection because the gateway can consider both what action the user is attempting and what data is being transferred. Network protocols such as STP, LACP, and HSRP do not inspect application payloads or data sensitivity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 211.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which security feature is most appropriate for blocking executable downloads from uncategorized or high-risk websites?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> File-type filtering<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route summarization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN pruning<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Port-channel configuration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">File-type filtering can block executable or otherwise risky file formats even when no malware verdict is available. This is useful for destinations that are uncategorized, newly observed, or otherwise considered higher risk. The control complements malware reputation and sandboxing by restricting file delivery based on policy. Routing and switching technologies do not inspect web content at the file level.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 212.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which malware capability provides the best additional analysis when a downloaded file has an unknown reputation?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP inspection<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Sandbox analysis<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Route tracking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP snooping<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sandbox analysis evaluates an unknown or suspicious file in an isolated environment and observes its behavior. It can detect malicious actions such as process creation, persistence, network callbacks, or file modification that may not be visible through static reputation checks. This is particularly useful for newly created malware. HSRP, routing, and DHCP security mechanisms do not provide file behavior analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 213.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which capability is most useful after an unknown file is later reclassified as malicious?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Retrospective file tracking<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Interface monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> VLAN database inspection<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> STP topology review<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Retrospective file tracking allows defenders to identify where a file was previously observed and which users or endpoints may have received it. This becomes important when threat intelligence changes a file&#8217;s verdict after the original download. Analysts can then focus remediation efforts on potentially affected systems. Interface, VLAN, and STP information cannot provide equivalent historical file-level visibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 214.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which factor should influence whether an HTTPS destination is decrypted besides the user&#8217;s web-access permission?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Switchport mode only<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Privacy, policy, and application compatibility requirements<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> HSRP timers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ethernet duplex only<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether a user may visit a site and whether the session should be decrypted are separate decisions. TLS inspection policy should account for privacy requirements, regulatory obligations, certificate pinning, technical compatibility, and security risk. Some permitted sites may be decrypted, while others may require an exception. Network-layer settings such as HSRP timers or duplex do not determine whether HTTPS content should be intercepted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 215.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which symptom most strongly indicates a certificate-pinning problem during TLS inspection?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> One specific application fails while normal HTTPS browsing works<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> All users lose DNS resolution<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Every switch interface shuts down<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> DHCP addresses are not assigned<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Certificate pinning typically affects particular applications that expect a specific certificate or public key. If normal HTTPS browsing succeeds but one application consistently fails only when TLS inspection is enabled, pinning or another application-specific certificate validation mechanism is a strong possibility. Logs and controlled testing should confirm the cause before any bypass is created. DNS, switch interfaces, and DHCP are unrelated to this TLS-specific symptom.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 216.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which response is best after confirming that a required application cannot function because of certificate pinning?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable TLS inspection for the entire organization<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Create the narrowest possible decryption bypass<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable authentication globally<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove all URL filtering<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 2<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A narrowly scoped bypass limits the loss of visibility to only the application that cannot tolerate TLS interception. The exception should be based on specific destinations or other precise criteria, documented, and periodically reviewed. Disabling decryption globally would unnecessarily reduce security coverage for all other HTTPS traffic. Other security controls, including DNS reputation and access policy, should remain active where possible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 217.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which Cisco service is best suited for stopping a connection to a known malicious domain before the full web session begins?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Umbrella<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco UCS Manager<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco APIC<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Cisco Unified Communications Manager<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cisco Umbrella can apply security policy during DNS resolution, preventing clients from resolving known malicious domains. This can stop phishing, malware delivery, or command-and-control traffic before the full application session begins. Umbrella is especially useful as a cloud-delivered security layer for both on-network and roaming users, depending on deployment. UCS Manager, APIC, and Unified Communications Manager perform unrelated infrastructure or collaboration functions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 218.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which limitation should be considered when relying on DNS-layer security?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It may not stop connections made directly to an IP address<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It automatically decrypts all HTTPS traffic<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It eliminates the need for endpoint security<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It blocks every possible attack<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DNS-layer security is effective when a connection depends on domain resolution. If malware communicates directly with an IP address or uses another method that avoids DNS, the DNS control may not see the request. For this reason, DNS security should be combined with endpoint protection, secure web gateways, firewalls, and monitoring. It is a powerful security layer but not a complete replacement for other controls.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 219.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Which operational practice best helps identify whether a new policy has increased proxy latency or resource consumption?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Compare post-change performance metrics with a known baseline<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable all monitoring<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review only user screen resolution<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove transaction logs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 1<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Comparing post-change CPU, memory, connection counts, transaction rates, and response latency with a known baseline helps determine whether a policy change is affecting appliance performance. TLS inspection, malware analysis, and additional logging can all increase resource demands. Baseline comparison is more reliable than relying only on anecdotal user reports. Monitoring should remain enabled so the team can identify trends and determine whether capacity or policy tuning is required.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Question 220.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>A new DLP rule successfully blocks confidential uploads but also blocks several legitimate business transactions. What should the administrator do next?<\/b><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><b><\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Disable all web security permanently<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>2.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ignore the business impact<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>3.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Review the matched DLP conditions, tune the rule to reduce false positives, and retest with a limited group<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><b>4.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Remove all identity integration<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><b>Correct Answer: 3<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Explanation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A DLP rule can be technically effective but still require tuning if it generates unacceptable false positives. The administrator should review which patterns or classifiers matched, determine how legitimate business traffic differs from prohibited transfers, and adjust the rule carefully. Retesting with a limited group helps confirm that protection remains effective without causing unnecessary disruption. Broadly disabling security controls would remove protection rather than solving the policy-design problem.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View Full Cisco CCNP Security 300-725 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Dumps &nbsp; Question 201. Which Secure Web Appliance policy is most appropriate when access should depend on both the user&#8217;s identity and the destination category? Identity-aware access policy 2. Static route 3. HSRP group 4. Port-channel policy Correct Answer: 1 Explanation: An identity-aware access [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1648,1647],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24067"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24067"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24067\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24068,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24067\/revisions\/24068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.examlabs.com\/certification\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}